As it stands now...the 2006 Rangers...
DH -- David Dellucci
RF -- Brad Wilkerson
SS -- Mike Young
1B -- Mark Teixeira
3B -- Hank Blalock
LF -- Kevin Mench
CF -- Laynce Nix
C -- Rod Barajas
2B -- D'Angelo Jimenez
Rotation:
Kevin Millwood
Adam Eaton
Vicente Padilla
Juan Dominguez
Kam Loe
Bench:
Gary Matthews Jr.
Phil Nevin
Mark DeRosa
Gerald Laird
Bullpen:
Francisco Cordero
Akinori Otsuka
John Wasdin
Jon Leicester
Joaquin Benoit
Fabio Castro
Brian Shouse
That's how I'd guess the team will break camp, barring injuries. And I'm starting to swing over to the p.o.v. that the Rangers are best served with Jimenez as the starting 2B and Kinsler at AAA to start the season, despite my constant bitching the last six months or so about how Kinsler should be the starting 2B in 2006.
GMJ could be the starting CF, which would bump Nix to AAA and necessitate adding a 4th outfielder, having someone like Adrian Brown stick with the team. And Botts could stick in place of Nevin, in which case I'd guess that GMJ and Dellucci would probably split time in one of the corner outfield slots, with Botts DHing regularly.
But really, it looks like the 2006 Rangers are pretty much in place.
This is a really interesting team...and at the risk of sounding like Dick Vitale or Hubie Brown doing NBA draft coverage, what really makes it intriguing is the team's upside, particularly in the rotation.
Millwood was the 2nd best starter in the A.L. last season. Padilla was a legit #2 starter before injuries slowed him the last two years. Eaton and Dominguez both have the stuff to be top-of-the-rotation starters.
Which doesn't mean, of course, that all those guys are going to hit, or that any of them will, for that matter. But what Daniels has done here is assemble a rotation that has huge breakout potential, that could do like the 2005 ChiSox and provide quality from top to bottom. And yes, at the same time, these guys have huge flameout potential, as well...but looking at this rotation, you can legitimately say that, if things break right, the Rangers could have a team that could do damage in the playoffs in 2006.
I still think the Rangers are a bat short right now...even if Hank shows that 2005 was an aberration, and gets back on track, either DH or CF will need to be upgraded. DH could be upgraded internally, if Jason Botts hits like he did at Oklahoma last season. And if Laynce Nix's problems hitting were really, as some have suggested, the result of his shoulder problems (which have now been repaired), CF could solve itself.
I'm going to analyze the team in more detail when we get closer in, to get a better handle on what I think the over/under for wins should be. But right now, I'm feeling pretty encouraged about things, and think that the Rangers should at least be able to contend in the A.L. West in 2006.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A bat short...
Dellucci still strikes me as a big if. Blalock could be the 05 version, or the 03 version. And Laynce Nix and Jiminez are complete enigmas.
I'm less leery of Barajas...he could easily give way to the highly favored Laird, and that's good depth.
Teixeira and Young are what you count on. What else is new?
Great to see...uh...aggressiveness and creativity from the GM, though. Seriously.
2006 Rangers
I wouldn't be opposed to letting Nix play most of 2006 in AAA and see if you can make due with what you have. One more bat would be nice but it might not be needed if the rotation comes through as expected and the bullpin comes back to life.
kinsler
but yeah this team needs 1 more solid bat, which could be solved by letting botts dh.
What is this
I don't think JD is...
umm...
by Andrew F Medina on Dec 26, 2005 8:18 PM CST reply actions
about 2 years ago...
by TheHossMan on Dec 26, 2005 10:00 PM CST up reply actions
"fell apart"
by markaholden on Dec 26, 2005 10:18 PM CST up reply actions
Car accident
by LoneStarBallUser on Dec 27, 2005 7:29 AM CST up reply actions
Extra Bat
Awesome
by Dustin on Dec 26, 2005 10:24 PM CST reply actions
players should be happy...
Whether or not you agree with the Eaton trade, we did recieve a proven pitcher with experience. I know he's never pitched 200 innings, but he has pitched with some great pitchers for a number of years. Add Millwood and Padilla and we have a trio of pitchers who can do an adequate job on the field while providing mentorship to Loe, Dominguez and whoever else we throw up there off.
by TheHossMan on Dec 26, 2005 10:42 PM CST up reply actions
comment
There's no question about his talent, that's for sure.
I like Padilla. I've always liked him, actually, and wouldn't be shocked if he turns in a better season than either Eaton or Millwood.
by Dustin on Dec 26, 2005 11:29 PM CST up reply actions
Next Signing
Teixeira
I expect him to go to arbitration for the next three years, and then possibly sign a long-term deal with Texas.
And I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.
by BurntOrange on Dec 27, 2005 11:02 AM CST up reply actions
They may have upside...
Feldman
Feldman
Feldman
by BurntOrange on Dec 27, 2005 11:06 AM CST up reply actions
re:
by Alan Smithee on Dec 27, 2005 2:32 PM CST up reply actions
Yep.....
That said, starting Wilson in the rotation at Oklahoma may not be a bad thing. I wouldn't write him off as a starter, just because he was put in a position last year that basically guaranteed failure.
by BurntOrange on Dec 27, 2005 6:56 PM CST up reply actions
Yep
Barring injury, Feldman, Littleton, Carlson, Wilson, and Mahay are in AAA.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 27, 2005 8:14 PM CST up reply actions
My only worry.....
Not just Dellucci...
by TheHossMan on Dec 29, 2005 3:52 PM CST up reply actions
Seems something is missing....
Now, I'm not too excited about some of the lineup listed above, especially with Delucci leading off, but maybe that's just me. I was hoping to see it more like this, barring any more position player moves. I honestly don't see Nevin riding the pine at 9 or 10 million this season. Additionally, I see Dellucci as moving around spelling other OF's, and Wilkerson moving to CF, with DD in RF when spelling GMJ...any way, this is what I see.
RF -- Brad Wilkerson
SS -- Mike Young
1B -- Mark Teixeira
3B -- Hank Blalock
LF -- Kevin Mench
DH -- Nevin/Botts
C -- Laird/Barajas
CF -- GMJ
2B -- D'Angelo Jimenez
Rotation:
Kevin Millwood
Adam Eaton
Vicente Padilla
Juan Dominguez
Kam Loe
Bench:
Dellucci
Nevin/Botts
Mark DeRosa
Laird/Barajas
(One more defensive/baserunning role player)
Bullpen:
Francisco Cordero
Akinori Otsuka
John Wasdin
Jon Leicester
Joaquin Benoit
Fabio Castro
Brian Shouse
(I expect one less in the bullpen. If the starters eat up innings like they should, then 7 RP's might be overkill)
As for possibly adding Clemens, well that changes somethings, but I would take this team in against most any other WITH Clemens and production from the DH position. Also, I think Cordero is serviceable, but I don't look on him as a shut the door kind of closer.
BTW, I can't bear the thought of Nevin stinking up the joint like last season, but oh well. I think would rather see Laird or Barajas DH instead of him, when they aren't catching.
I just feel that Daniels isn't done shuffling things with the position players, and I expect another notable move (not including a possible Clemens deal).
Anyway, I'm just glad I can enjoy the site again.

by 

















