Ponson about to be a Ranger?
According to Evan Grant of the DMN, the Rangers are in "advanced talks" with Sidney Ponson on a one year low base, incentive laden contract.
Meh. I don't really want Ponson here, but on something like that, as a low-risk gamble, I don't have a big issue with it.
Grant also says that Daniels is considering offers regarding Kevin Mench and Brad Wilkerson. As I've said before, all things being equal, I'd rather keep Wilkerson.
22 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
ponson
Hicks on ESPN radio this morning
I am not quoting here, but Hicks basically said that they have spoken to Ponson and the Rangers FrontOffice feels as though Ponson has turned his life around and that Ponson knows he needs to change.
Also, the announcer asked Hicks "it seems that someone in the Rangers FO has liked Ponson for a while, who is it that reaally does?" Hicks said, that it was basically the scouts that liked POnson. He said the scouts say Ponson has some filthy stuff and can be good. Also, Hicks through in there that "when A-rod was here" A-Rod commented once that "Ponson has some of hte filthliest stuff in the Majors" Also, Hicks said, that D. Chiti had met with Ponson.
I think this is a done deal, as long as Ponson does not get a better offer (and who exactly would give him better, I am not sure) nonethelesss, I think we are looking at Ponson in spring training and I think a member of the Starting Five to begin the season.....and to me, that Blows!
JD, you have made one good transaction (trading Soriano), if you have any pull, stay away from Ponson.
If we
I do not understand this at all
From a Baltimore Sun blog ...
In talking to some baseball officials, it's clear that pitcher Sidney Ponson is becoming a hot commodity on the free agent market, judging by the number of teams that are expressing interest in him. People in the industry who predict that the Orioles will be obligated to pay the remaining $10 million on his contract after a March hearing envision a team signing Ponson at a discount rate and getting a potential 18-game winner for the middle or back end of its rotation. Whatever money he obtains from another club would be subtracted from the Orioles' ledger, so nobody will be motivated to dole out millions unless some sort of bidding war unfolds.
No matter what an arbitrator decides in March, Ponson won't secure another $22.5 million contract. He isn't holding out for one, either. He could be quite a bargain, given his age and his arm. It's just imperative that his head is attached properly.
I've talked to a few people who have seen Ponson in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and they all rave about his conditioning and his attitude. If he goes to a bar to meet up with friends, he drinks water. He's much thinner, and he's working out every morning.
I'm told that he'd prefer to pitch for a team that has a decent shot to make the playoffs, after experiencing that thrill with the San Francisco Giants in 2003. Also, a friend of mine who recently made contact with Ponson said that under the right circumstances, he'd be willing to change roles and become a closer. The old Sidney used to push aside that suggestion like a plate of cottage cheese and a non-alcohol beer, but he seems to be a different man now in many ways.
If a team with a deep rotation and a hole at the back end of its bullpen comes calling, he'll definitely listen. Hey, don't the Orioles need a closer?
Hmmm
because
Don't get emotional
by Dustin on Dec 10, 2005 12:58 AM CST up reply actions
Agreed
I still want at least two other decent starters though. Ponson, Morris, and ???
by thedirkatron on Dec 10, 2005 1:07 AM CST up reply actions
Good Risk
by huskers22 on Dec 10, 2005 12:28 AM CST reply actions
Ponson = Bottom Feeding
by rob @ Lone Star Ball on Dec 10, 2005 12:40 AM CST reply actions
I don't see a problem with this
I'd have no problem
Ponson
Have to pursue deals such as these
by pfe1223 on Dec 10, 2005 11:34 AM CST reply actions
Number
If it's a contract similar to the one Astacio got, I can't see the harm in it. The Matt Morris offer is still out there, so as of yet they haven't used this as a justification for not going after other pitchers.
This team is a freakin' joke
I give up.
by LoneStarBallUser on Dec 10, 2005 2:29 PM CST reply actions
re:
Pedro Astacio was a failed experiment, but he was also a very cheap one.
by Alan Smithee on Dec 10, 2005 2:52 PM CST up reply actions
Yes
You have to be realistic
I never disagreed with the Astacio signing for the same reasons. I disagreed with how long they kept shoving him out there, but that doesn't matter right now. He did, if you remember, turn in a few good performances early on.
by Dustin on Dec 10, 2005 7:29 PM CST up reply actions
Ponson
But assuming we add two other pitchers (one through trade, one through FA) I have absolutely no problem bringing the talented yet troubled Ponson in here to see if he really has changed. If he has turned his life around he can compete with Loe and Dominguez for the final two slots in the rotation.
If not, well, it's only half a million or so of Hicks' $'s. And I don't mind spending those.
by thedirkatron on Dec 11, 2005 4:05 AM CST up reply actions

by 





























