2008
So, I've been reading LSB pretty much all season, but I've never posted till now (I'm in law school and busy as hell). Anyway, it seems like everyone on this site is freaking out about next year. I'm worried that the Rangers might choke over this off-season and screw themselves over for next year.
I mean, this free agent class is pretty lame. Matsuzaka was the only potential ace. Zito, Schmidt, Padilla, Lilly, ect. are all good but with serious problems. Soriano is the only top-flight hitter (and I worry about his commitment...Soriano may have pulled a Dampier and gone crazy during his contract season only to regress next year). Lee and Ramirez are both better than average hitters.
But look at next year's (potential) free agents. It's scary.
Carlos Zambrano, Joe Nathan, Chris Carpenter, Curt Shilling, Jason Jennings, Bartolo Colon, John Smoltz, Jake Westbrook.
Ichiro, Andruw Jones, Carlos Guillen, Vernon Wells, Pudge, Michael Young, Torii Hunter, Marcus Giles, Adam Dunn, Milton Bradley, Jermaine Dye, Brandon Inge,
That's a ridiculous list, especially compared to this year's meager selections. Now I'm sure that some of those guys (please God, Michael Young) will sign early, but it will still be an amazing class.
Basically, I'm worried that the Rangers are going to be so focused on 2007 that they are going to give some big, long-term contracts to Zito types and not have any money for 2008. I'm not good with the whole money situation, so maybe someone smarter can figure out what salaries the Rangers have coming off the books after next season.
If we go get Zito, Padilla, Frank Thomas, and Brian Roberts, what $$ will be left?
Because Wells, Dye, and Zambrano sounds a lot better
P.S. What's the deal with all the lawyers on LSB? Weird.
0 recs |
27 comments
Comments
Lawyers
by Ed Coffin on Nov 15, 2006 2:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hmmm,
That's certainly the main reason why I started posting on the Rangers ESPN boards when I did.
Also, that's a large part of why I read the BTF forums, though, good, well-presented arguments seem to be dying somewhat over there (or at least there seems to be a lot more chaff than there used to be).
Req
by Requiem on Nov 15, 2006 3:05 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
BTF?
Too many judgmental mindreaders for my taste.
But maybe that's just me...
by Brian Thomas on Nov 15, 2006 4:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Heh....
Maybe. The quality certainly has deteriorated....
But at least those who do do the judgmental mindreading actually have something to contribute.
Not only that, but they usually outline what they're thinking, and why they're arguing what they're arguing.
Dustin at least seems to like to argue just for the sake of arguing which doesn't add anything to the conversation. Notice, that he'll add in some random post with no content just to get the last word in, even if he doesn't really have an argument.
I find that it's pointless to try and discuss things with people in that mindset.
I'm more than willing to discuss things with people who have a different idea on things, and I'm also willing to have my mind changed about things.
I'm not willing to deal with people who want to argue just for the sake of trying to show that they're always right or who argue just for the sake of arguing.
Req
by Requiem on Nov 15, 2006 8:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This is getting a little old, man
by Dustin on Nov 15, 2006 8:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
See....
He feels the need to have the last word, every time.
It's like clockwork, and yet again it adds nothing to the discussion. Not to mention it show his own childishness, when he's supposed to be the great arbiter of taste and refinement around here? I'm not the one who pretends to be that, plus I'm perfectly fine with my own faults. One thing I'll bet Dustin probably can't say.
It's that combination plus the judgmental mindreading that I'd rather not respond to. Plus, the lack of sufficient content to make it worthwhile. At least, Sharky gives me a laugh or two, every now and then. Dustin just becomes a droning, preaching bore.
Req
by Requiem on Nov 16, 2006 1:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There is no discussion
by Dustin on Nov 16, 2006 5:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Requiem and Dustin
k i s s i n g
Get a room. The sexual tension is at an all time high.
by DJCahill on Nov 16, 2006 6:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
don't think so
by Dustin on Nov 16, 2006 9:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
good arguments
by t ball on Nov 15, 2006 8:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Do you mean 2008?
I want the Rangers to make their run in 2008 after signing Pettitte this offseason (likely won't happen), and Zambrano and Wells in 2007-08 offseason.
Wells is probably the best combination of offense and defense in CF since Beltran and quite arguably could be BETTER than Beltran.
And Zambrano IS a #1, though his peripherals are worrying me somewhat.
BTW, Carpenter, Nathan, and Young all have options which will likely be exercized by their teams.
Not to mention, that it's possible that some of these guys will be locked up in the future (a la Oswalt).
Otherwise, you could start talking about the free agent class of 2008-09, with Johan Santana, Carpenter, and Bonderman hitting the market...
But yes my ideal situation if I were GM were to sign Pettitte this off-season, then sign Zambrano and Wells in 2007-08.
That gives a rotation of:
Zambrano
Millwood
Pettitte
Danks/Volquez/Hurley
one of those not above
with a lineup of
Laird
Teixeira
Kinsler
Young
Blalock
Cruz?/maybe someone else
Wells
somebody
which is a VERY solid pitching staff and lineup.
Don't know why there're a lot of lawyers on this site, but there are also a lot of lawyers on BTF also. Don't know what hypothesis to throw out there based on that....
I am not a lawyer, BTW.
Req
by Requiem on Nov 15, 2006 3:03 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
2008
by BAC on Nov 15, 2006 3:07 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Zambrano
by thedirkatron on Nov 15, 2006 7:21 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this is a theory
I don't buy it.
by ab03 on Nov 15, 2006 9:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Who said anything about
Who was the last true "ace" to hit the market? Pedro? Randy Johnson? I guess maybe Rocket, but he was never gonna go anywhere but Houston after his faux retirement.
Oswalt, Santana, Halladay and company have all been locked up well before they hit the market.
by thedirkatron on Nov 15, 2006 9:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Cubs are smart
by t ball on Nov 15, 2006 11:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, but why...
by rangersfan34 on Nov 15, 2006 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well
He could play out this season and then try to hit the market and probably make a few (million) extra bucks, but the risk there is tremendous.
What if he tears a rotator cuff? What if he has a smaller injury that, though it doesn't derail his career, sends his performance into a freefall?
To leave a 5yr/80mil contract on the table so you can go out and try to get 6yrs/96mil is a big risk, and a lot of pitchers see that.
by thedirkatron on Nov 16, 2006 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
pedro
by ab03 on Nov 15, 2006 1:53 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think
I probably should've said, YOUNG ace.
Older, physically deteriorating aces are available from time to time (like Pedro or Glavine), as are some special cases (like Clemens). Other than that most "aces" will have some serious warts and/or question marks, like Zito, Schmidt, Burnett, Millwood, or Pavano.
I think you'll be very hard pressed to find another young in his prime ace hit the market any time soon.
by thedirkatron on Nov 16, 2006 10:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Beltran
But another glowing opinion of an overrated ex-Astro national leaguer from you or Burnt..
by Sharky on Nov 15, 2006 3:17 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If Beltran was a longtime Ranger FA
Guaranteed.
They could prove me wrong by not loving Astros, or holding a Ranger FA's defense in high regard, but I've never seen any examples of that yet. And I do mean, ever.
by Sharky on Nov 15, 2006 3:21 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ignoring
by Ed Coffin on Nov 15, 2006 4:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanx, Shark, at least I'm not
Also, I guess lawyer's like a good argument.......
by tklawless on Nov 16, 2006 9:40 AM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















