Interesting McCarthy article...
...from the White Sox official website. Interestingly enough, it was posted online about an hour and a half before the trade was announced.
I'm not sure what to think of the trade, as I really like Danks and Masset, but this article will give everybody some insight into who McCarthy is...
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Looks pretty studly to me
by TexGoesYard on Dec 23, 2006 2:09 PM CST up reply actions
unless you just meant that they're both
by Alan Smithee on Dec 23, 2006 2:11 PM CST up reply actions
Probably not too bad a comp.......
mccarthy
by Alan Smithee on Dec 23, 2006 2:13 PM CST up reply actions
changeup
by The other Thomas on Dec 24, 2006 11:37 AM CST up reply actions
Still more video - stolen from the NMLR board
August 30th, 2005 - http://tinyurl.com/ygxtg6
Damn
Oh wait, HES ON OUR TEAM NOW.
Money.
by TexGoesYard on Dec 23, 2006 2:50 PM CST up reply actions
all I want for Christmas is a........
by rkh on Dec 23, 2006 2:08 PM CST reply actions
McCarthy
If he can fill out and pitch in the mid nineties he may be better than Chris.
Last off season I doubt the White Sox
the only
by myoungfan11 on Dec 23, 2006 2:30 PM CST reply actions
I don't like Danks leaving either
He has some hotties
by TexGoesYard on Dec 23, 2006 4:51 PM CST up reply actions
It's not the trade that I envisioned
I think the Rangers got the best player in this trade, though. That's not a knock on Danks.
Is Mccarthey
by myoungfan11 on Dec 23, 2006 4:41 PM CST up reply actions
FB pitcher
But, a fairly hefty percentage of his fly balls are IF. His IF/F percentage (14%) is comparable to Zito's this year (13%), and Chris Young's career mark (14%-15%).
I'm still stunned by the trade. I really thought a trade of Danks would bring back someone who is already near the top of a rotation rather than someone who has the potential to become that. But, I think the Rangers got the pitcher with the best stuff in this deal. I would much rather have McCarthy than Vazquez or Garland. I would've taken Buehrle over McCarthy, though.
Why
by myoungfan11 on Dec 23, 2006 5:47 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, but he could step into the #1 slot.
Actually, this trade for McCarthy is about what I hoped the Rangers would do for Bonderman. McCarthy isn't far behind Bonderman on the developmental curve, and his upside is about the same. I feel good about what the Rangers got, but I'm bummed about losing Danks.
Yeah
by myoungfan11 on Dec 23, 2006 11:14 PM CST up reply actions

by 

















