Given the debate that has occurred here recently, I thought I'd share this article on Slate.com about steroids. No evidence is offerred by against Pujols, Giambi, or Clemens, but the author's point is that writers don't do the investigating that is needed. It does seem that many journalists have stopped following the steroids angle, and they all rail against Bonds because everyone does it. But, without the Chronicle, we probably wouldn't know about it.

http://www.slate.com/id/2142937/

On the other hand, if this writer is so upset about the lack of reporting on the issue, why doesn't he do some reporting himself?