AL Rotation Rankings
Joh Weisman of si has his Rotaion Rankings up and has put our dead last WITH Volquez. He obviously doesn't know anything about this team if he lists Rheinecker and Wright as candidates
Is Millwood really below average?
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/jon_weisman/12/21/al.rotations/index.html
0 recs |
20 comments
Comments
MJH
by rldwb on Dec 23, 2007 10:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Depends on
Talk about a guy who doesn't seem to give a crap most offseasons.
by DJCahill on Dec 23, 2007 10:01 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
+ 1
It will be interesting to see what kind of shape he turns up in this spring. EG was dogging him all last year for showing up in bad shape. The Rangers gave the guy the "ace" crown and he's done nothing but eat donuts and hunt as a payback. And NO hunting is NOT athleticism. Do you consider Dick Cheney an athlete??
by LAMuscleFag on Dec 23, 2007 10:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ranking
I've watched Millwood pitch for 2 years now here in Arlington. I'd have to think really hard to give him an "average" rating.
But, if I had to give him a rating for how he feels about getting a contract that sets him up for life, I'd rate him A+.
by LBrooks on Dec 23, 2007 11:56 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I think just about everybody gets an A+ then.
by brettgardner on Dec 23, 2007 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It gives me a rash on my A
by thedirkatron on Dec 23, 2007 2:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
better get that looked at, H...
by RangerMoto on Dec 23, 2007 4:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What a pointless article...
by BlackGloveRighty on Dec 23, 2007 7:13 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well
by brettgardner on Dec 23, 2007 7:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I agree BGR.....
Nothing against Kam & Rhino but, this guy has to be the only one to equate those 2 with Millwood/Padilla, even as bad as last year sucked!
by tklawless on Dec 23, 2007 8:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It was worth an email to the SI editors
Weisman is one of the prominent reasons your baseball coverage simply lacks credibility. His tomes on ranking the AL and NL pitching staffs for 2008:
- Includes pitchers who won't be on rosters
- Ignores career trended performances readily available with a little research
- Indicts a few pitchers on grounds that are as shaky as a lava flow
- Identifies virtually nothing about incoming starters who can pitch higher in the rotation than #5
- Isolates factual but relatively meaningless information to downgrade some staffs
- Idles right past the context in which they are pitching (League, Division, matchups)
- Inflames the non-casual followers of the game
- Illustrates the quick splash mentality of SI/CNN
- Infers that he is in any way qualified to make such assessments, and
- Irritates me that it consumes online bandwidth.
- I hope you get the point.
by Ed Coffin on Dec 23, 2007 8:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
¡Vámanos!
by Chase Irwin on Dec 23, 2007 9:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
And the crowd roars
by t ball on Dec 23, 2007 9:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent...
by benmor78 on Dec 23, 2007 10:31 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Just a quick question
by SwiperNoSwiping on Dec 24, 2007 7:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yes, I do
The reporting here is incomplete at best. Do the Rangers need more pitching? Of course. Will they finish 5th in the AL this year? Maybe, probably closer to 8th-10th is my guess as they work in a couple of younger guys. But they are not the worst rotation in baseball, or even in the AL.
by t ball on Dec 24, 2007 7:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
others
Point is, rotations are fraught with uncertainty, and 2007 was just about a worst case scenario for TX. There will be some regression to the mean for these guys, as the 2nd half showed.
by t ball on Dec 24, 2007 7:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















