Bye bye, Freddy Guzman

by Adam J. Morris on Dec 5, 2007 5:22 PM CST in News

0 recs | 49 comments

Email Print

Comments

any names

of people you think they may target?

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 5:13 PM CST   0 recs

Brian Barton leaps to mind

by Adam J. Morris on Dec 5, 2007 5:18 PM CST up   0 recs

Or...

D'Antona.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Dec 5, 2007 5:36 PM CST up   0 recs

what would the rangers do with dantona

1b?  doubt he would stick

by ab03 on Dec 5, 2007 5:45 PM CST up   0 recs

play

against lefties

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 5:48 PM CST up   0 recs

great

except he's a lot worse against lefties

by ab03 on Dec 5, 2007 5:55 PM CST up   0 recs

oh

I didn't take the time to look at his splits. I just assumed. My bad.

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 5:56 PM CST up   0 recs

never mind

looked up the wrong guy's stats

by ab03 on Dec 5, 2007 5:57 PM CST up   0 recs

beware park factors

when looking at D'Antona's stats.

BP has Tucson with park factor of 1070 over the last 3 years.  Viewed though that lens, his stats look pretty fringy for a 1B.

Some professionals get better with age and experience. Lawyers, professors, engineers. Hookers? Not so much. -- DJ Cahill

by tricer on Dec 5, 2007 5:48 PM CST up   0 recs

i think it will be him

swap one OF prospect for another.  although, to be fair, i don't see how he would stick either

by ab03 on Dec 5, 2007 5:48 PM CST up   0 recs

What team?

by RangerMad on Dec 5, 2007 5:15 PM CST   0 recs

That's my question

The PTBNL could be any one of probably thousands now.

by Inkara1 on Dec 5, 2007 5:21 PM CST up   0 recs

I like that

Hey Freddie: you've been traded.  Where?  One of the other 29 teams.  For who?  We don't know yet.  Could be anyone.

by JBImaknee on Dec 5, 2007 5:24 PM CST up   0 recs

fast freddy

traded to detroit

baseBALLIN!

by kevzta on Dec 5, 2007 7:25 PM CST up   0 recs

Lubanski ...

kinda slumped, but tons of potential

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 5:21 PM CST   0 recs

I've liked him

for awhile.  

by brettgardner on Dec 5, 2007 5:24 PM CST up   0 recs

still really young too.

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 5:25 PM CST up   0 recs

I wonder

if they did it to move up in the draft.

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 5:23 PM CST   0 recs

I've

seen Jeff Allison's name thrown around. Did he come back to pitch last year? Or is he still out with "personal" issues?

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 5:28 PM CST   0 recs

*in addition,

his name was not connected to the Rangers. Just mentioned.

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 5:29 PM CST up   0 recs

I think I might prefer

Allison too. Of course this organization recently showed how much it enjoys carrying a pitcher who isn't yet ready. On the other hand, it does appear that they are more realistic about their chances this year than 2006.

by zywica on Dec 5, 2007 5:57 PM CST up   0 recs

He has the

potential to be an impact player, but he has lots of baggage.

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 6:24 PM CST up   0 recs

Detroit Tigers

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 5:51 PM CST   0 recs

Needed a AAA OFer...

after trading Maybin?

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Dec 5, 2007 6:06 PM CST up   0 recs

the way i understand it

there was no need for the rangers to open up a roster spot on the 40 for the Rule V right?  And, I would think the Rangers pick higher than the Tigers in the Rule V.  So, does this really have Rule V implications?

by ab03 on Dec 5, 2007 6:08 PM CST   0 recs

possible relationship

is there anyone that Detroit left off their 40 that they may be sending us?  The only hang-up is whether they get drafted or not?

by JBImaknee on Dec 5, 2007 6:14 PM CST up   0 recs

I thought

the 40 was full; a team can't participate in the rule V if they don't have an open roster spot.

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 6:17 PM CST up   0 recs

i could be wrong

but don't the rosters have to be submitted by Nov. 20th.  If a roster spot isn't open by then, the rangers can't participate right?  

This is something I just assumed but writing it out, doesn't seem to make sense.  

by ab03 on Dec 5, 2007 6:20 PM CST up   0 recs

I think players

must be added by then; so that they are protected.

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 6:25 PM CST up   0 recs

Chris Shelton

that is who Evan Grant hopes it is.

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 6:12 PM CST   0 recs

Dood needs a proofreader

"We should now tomorrow after the Rule 5 draft. Oh, the anticipation."

by Longhorn on Dec 5, 2007 6:41 PM CST up   0 recs

All

DMN writers have a tremendous amount of errors, especially in the blogs.  It's pretty embarrassing.

by brettgardner on Dec 5, 2007 6:48 PM CST up   0 recs

I would guess

it is Shelton if we don't take anyone in the Rule V.

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 6:56 PM CST up   0 recs

I don't understand.

The article says he was traded to the Tigers.  Wouldn't that be a trade down in the Rule V draft?  Maybe there are two guys they want to draft.

Colbert/Colbert '08

by rooster on Dec 5, 2007 6:38 PM CST   0 recs

maybe

it is because we are getting Chris Shelton.

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 6:41 PM CST up   0 recs

That's a very good deal....

if it's for Shelton....

either way, not that much of a loss in Guzman, IMO, so this could potentially be a great trade or a 'meh' trade.

Req

by Requiem on Dec 5, 2007 7:17 PM CST up   0 recs

Shelton

He was DFA'd last week, so it wouldn't surprise me if he's he PTBNL. I'd be very pleased with that.

"Then I met some friends for a beer, went to a BoDeans's concert, and son of a vondruke, if I didn't leave him at the concert hall."

by RCCook on Dec 5, 2007 7:18 PM CST up   0 recs

why

was he DFA'd? He's not a bad player by any means.

"2008 should be about rebuilding, 2009 about taking a step forward. 2010 is the target year." -AJM

by dstar442005 on Dec 5, 2007 7:21 PM CST up   0 recs

Shelton was DFA'ed....

because Detroit wanted to improve their bullpen with Cruceta, and they needed space on the 40 for him.

This was before the Miguel Cabrera trade, of course.

Req

by Requiem on Dec 5, 2007 7:37 PM CST up   0 recs

I would think that is it...

just not sure what else Detroit could have got for the guy anyway.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Dec 5, 2007 7:22 PM CST up   0 recs

why would it be a PTBNL though, why

not just say shelton outright?

well, i hope its shelton anyway.  completes our 1b platoon with someone who should legitimately mash lefties.

by DSheppard on Dec 5, 2007 7:25 PM CST up   0 recs

maybe

to allow the Rangers to participate in the draft. Just in case someone they like falls.

by BHill on Dec 5, 2007 7:27 PM CST up   0 recs

that's my guess

they wanted to free a spot for the rule 5 in case a guy fell to them they wanted, if not they get the ptbnl that needs to be on the 40

Can you please Look into getting a less funny signature? That's sarcasm, btw. - Sharky

by rentz on Dec 5, 2007 7:29 PM CST up   0 recs

Yep

Shelton was on Detroit's 40-man, so if he is the player coming back, he'll have to be put on the Rangers' 40-man.

So by making him the PTBNL (if that's the case) the Rangers can make a Rule 5 pick tomorrow, then cut someone else to make room for Shelton.

"Then I met some friends for a beer, went to a BoDeans's concert, and son of a vondruke, if I didn't leave him at the concert hall."

by RCCook on Dec 5, 2007 7:33 PM CST up   0 recs

Interesting

The Rangers were interested in center fielder Nate McLouth. I like how JD is thinking about his OF, but anybody know much about him defensively in CF?

by Longhorn on Dec 5, 2007 6:46 PM CST   0 recs

It's Shelton

Per TRs Blog. Certainly a solid swap regardless if Shelton pays off or not.

by atlantaranger on Dec 5, 2007 8:06 PM CST   0 recs

hot damn

I like it...

Brett Gardner broke my heart...

by Brian Thomas on Dec 5, 2007 8:10 PM CST up   0 recs

Very nice move

by zywica on Dec 5, 2007 8:10 PM CST up   0 recs

since the PTBNL

has already been named, I guess we are not eligible to participate in Rule 5 draft?

Some professionals get better with age and experience. Lawyers, professors, engineers. Hookers? Not so much. -- DJ Cahill

by tricer on Dec 5, 2007 8:32 PM CST up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed

• ↑ Top of comments
• ↑ Top of page
• ↑ Stories
• ↑ Lone Star Ball