Getting fired up about Brandon McCarthy
Ready to get fired up about Brandon McCarthy?
Jim Reeves has a column out on McCarthy, talking him up as a guy who makes the Ranger scouts get all weak in the knees:
* * *
There are no guarantees, of course, but as senior scout Mel Didier said Tuesday as he watched McCarthy throw his first bullpen session since camp opened, there's a chance.
Didier was one of the voices Daniels listened to carefully when making the trade for McCarthy. Like McCarthy, Didier lives here in Arizona. He scouted the 23-year-old right-hander during a workout in December, before the deal was consummated.
"I regard McCarthy as one of the top five young pitchers under 24 years old in our game," Didier said. "I believe he'll be a starter who can maybe work himself up to a No. 1 or No. 2."
Where some scouts look at the 6-foot-7 McCarthy and see another Jack McDowell, Didier sees former Cardinals ace Matt Morris.
"Matt Morris, when he came into the game was just like McCarthy, tall and skinny," Didier said. "He threw from a downhill plane. He threw a little harder than McCarthy.
"Both had great curveballs that are equalizers. McCarthy has a better changeup and better control. Matt Morris didn't have that kind of control when he first came up."
* * *
"He has three major league pitches," pitching coach Mark Connor said. "His changeup is top of the scale. His curveball is above average. His fastball hits 88-92 (mph), and he has good control.
"He's exuberant about starting. He didn't like being in the bullpen. I think we're getting him at the right time."
So does McCarthy, who has seen the major league careers of contemporaries such as Francisco Liriano and Justin Verlander already taking off. He's ready to start playing catch-up.
"I definitely envision myself as a future ace," he said. "I would love to be in that role. I welcomed that in the minor leagues. In high school and college, that was something I thrived on, the guy that every five days goes out to the mound, a Chris Carpenter, Johan Santana type where you just know you've got a good chance to get a good win today and get a good outing."
Watching him throw Tuesday, Didier remembered again seeing McCarthy last spring in a White Sox uniform. At that point, he could only drool and hope.
"I won't say I was mesmerized, but I said then, `God, this guy's got something going for him that's going to be special.' He threw a lot of balls right on the knees and threw quality strikes," Didier recalled. "I just feel like he's that kind of guy, that he could be something special.
"Who knows? Only God knows how he's going to turn out. But he's got the chance to really be something. He's got that chance."
I try to stay cynical -- it is the only way to stay sane, as a Ranger fan -- but reading stuff like that does get me pretty fired up about seeing McCarthy in the rotation.
Reeves also hits on the behind-the-scenes issues that have been hinted at with McCarthy and Kenny Williams:
"Without getting too much into it, there were personal things between us in different realms, but not really in how I was being used, certainly not last year," McCarthy said. "When you've got five (starters) of that caliber, cracking that rotation is certainly not going to be easy.
"I said it a lot of times that I would love to be starting, but that was the competitive side of me. I wasn't whining or complaining, but I don't know if that was taken out of context."
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Encouraging
by Ed Coffin on Feb 20, 2007 7:58 PM CST reply actions
It's almost bizarre and surreal...
McCarthy is huge for us
Absolutely
Well I don't have
From what most people have said, the four most important players this season are McCarthy, Tejeda, Blalock, and Wilkerson. I would agree with that assessment. Nevertheless, I think you need one of either McCarthy or Tejeda and one of either Blalock or Wilkerson to produce at their capabilities to be in contention.
Given that we have other options available in the outfield (Cat, Lofton, Cruz, Botts, Sosa [ugh], Diaz, etc) I would say Blalock is even more important than Wilkerson and he is a better bet to perform at a high offensive level than Wilk.
Similarly, Tejeda and McCarthy are both equally important, but given McCarthy's stellar minor league numbers and his K/BB ratio, it is fair to say he has the higher ceiling.
So while I agree Wilkerson or Tejeda are very important, I think Blalock and McCarthy are the best bets and most important keys to the Rangers season.
Wilk
by Walter Sobchak on Feb 21, 2007 12:37 PM CST up reply actions
He said he feels pretty good
by Brian Thomas on Feb 21, 2007 1:23 PM CST up reply actions
thanks Brian
by Walter Sobchak on Feb 21, 2007 10:54 PM CST up reply actions
Fine thanks
by Brian Thomas on Feb 22, 2007 10:46 AM CST up reply actions
Everyone is overly exuberant
His WHIP last year was 1.56 BECAUSE he walked 32 batters in 73.2 innings. Compare that to Benoit with a WHIP of 1.33 with 38 walks, four of which were intentional, in 79.2 innings.
Benoit allowed 68 hits, five were HRs. Tejeda allowed 83 hits ten of which were HRs. Each plunked three opponents but Benoit had 85 SOs while Tejeda had 40. One relieved and the other started so perhaps it isn't a fair comparison but it is profound.
One last point or two. Tejeda had an opponent's BA of .360 and has been very consistent in two years of major league experience with an average of 17.17 pitches per inning. A little math tells us he would have to pitch an average almost 103 pitches per game just to get through 6 innings. Unfortunately he only averages 5.89 innings per game over two years and last year only 5.29 innings per start.
He's young and will probably become a decent number 4 or 5 type. This year? I doubt it.
If so, the number 4 starter will be pretty exciting and it should only get better with the number 5 starter.
Prediction: Tejeda starts in AAA because we have too much talent for him to be on the 25 man team. He may be called up by June but he starts in AAA. BTW I am not oblivious to the fact that he has been given the 4th position to lose.
you know
Personal conflict
I am really looking forward to watching McCarthy pitch in April. I hope JD, Didier, and Connor are right and the Rangers have a stud under their control for the next 5 seasons.
Yep.
Yep, it was his sister..........
I'm not sure
I really think that this is also a big signal on what kind of confidence we can have in our scouts. Our pro scouts are some of the same people who made nice choices on Rupe and Francisco but also the guys who chose Arias over Cano, with time to scout them.
If they're right about McCarthy I'll feel a whole lot more comfortable in trusting them on scouting calls like this one (although who knows how much longer Didier himself will be around, I guess). This deal is really significant in that regard to me.
It was Giordano who chose Arias, wasn't it?
by Brian Thomas on Feb 21, 2007 7:33 AM CST up reply actions
how about scouting our own players?
Chris Young
by Adam J. Morris on Feb 21, 2007 10:34 AM CST up reply actions
Also
So not only do these guys need to have made the right evaluation on McCarthy, but they need to know their own system well enough to know that Danks, Masset and Rasner aren't going to just kill them to let go.
by Brett Perryman on Feb 21, 2007 9:40 AM CST up reply actions
Alvarez, Sosa, Bohanon
by Adam J. Morris on Feb 21, 2007 10:33 AM CST up reply actions
Yes and no
Belcher was in the middle of establishing himself as a top 100 prospect at the time (he came in at #82 on the 1990 list which was published after the '89 season), and I distinctly remember the comment of Belcher covering for Sosa. It's always stuck with me. My recollection is that Marty Scott made it, but I can't remember if Grieve echoed it or not.
Also, while the belief was that Gonzalez could handle CF for a time (and he did), part of the reason Belcher could cover for Sosa was that he projected as more of a CF long term. Obviously Sosa only played the rest of the '89 season at CF before moving to RF (and had that enticing arm) and Belcher washed out, but both were seen as more the speedy guys with the correct body types to handle CF, whereas they knew Juando was going to fill out and be a big man. But if you project the OF, you have Sierra and Gonzalez in the corners and Belcher in CF. So there's room to trade Sosa. Incaviglia was still there, but at 25 in '89 put up a .236/.293/.453 line, so he obviously wasn't blocking anyone. And Espy was a pretty ineffective hitter in CF himself.
by Brett Perryman on Feb 21, 2007 10:51 AM CST up reply actions
Yeah I probably do too
by Brett Perryman on Feb 21, 2007 12:18 PM CST up reply actions
Cano
Yeah I would say so
by Brett Perryman on Feb 21, 2007 11:18 AM CST up reply actions
What ever happened to Rudy Guillen?
by Brian Thomas on Feb 21, 2007 1:27 PM CST up reply actions
He's pretty much bombed out
by Brett Perryman on Feb 21, 2007 1:42 PM CST up reply actions
Gammons
by Walter Sobchak on Feb 21, 2007 12:39 PM CST up reply actions
Potential Trade
This got me thinking.
Why not trade for another young pitcher that can pitch for us now.
What type of pitcher can we get if we packaged Diamond, Arias, Botts, Otsuka together? If a team likes Volquez more, then include him in part of the deal instead of someone else. Perhaps they like Volquez over Arias.
I know it looks like we're trading all our chips away but if we can get another great starter, this team is pretty solid. Plus, the players we're trading doesn't seem like they'll be getting a chance on this team. Either due to no room or too young still.
I think Botts can be very good but I just don't see him getting the chance on this team. I'm packaging Otsuka because the other team can turn around and package him for something that they'd like (if they didn't want him on the roster).
For future years, we won't need to upgrade the C, 1B, 2B, SS, hopefully all 5 starting pitching slots (Millwood, Padilla, McCarthy, the pitcher we trade for, Tejada) and our pen is solid. Hopefully Hurley would become a great pitcher and take over Tejada's spot in the future. This is also going with us resigning Teix and Young.
So that leaves 3B, all 3 OF positions, and DH for the future. I list 3B in case Blalock doesn't work out. I feel we could fill those positions through FA.
Now back to Diamond, Arias, Botts, Otsuka. Is that something that could come close to landing someone like D. Willis?
re
A crappy one.
Now back to Diamond, Arias, Botts, Otsuka. Is that something that could come close to landing someone like D. Willis?
Goodness gracious no.
by Brett Perryman on Feb 22, 2007 12:58 AM CST up reply actions
Anyone else find it interesting that Miggy's
As sarcastic as this post is, I feel inclined to throw in a joke about 'meat-gazers,' but I can't think of any this morning. I'm open to suggestions.
Don't try that "meat-gazer" talk
He'll whittle ya down to size but quick w/ one of his "chinsults."
by Brian Thomas on Feb 22, 2007 8:29 PM CST up reply actions

by 

















