Wilkerson
Can someone please justify how he can make the team this season. I understand that it is only Spring Training, but his performance has been consistently dreadful. What would be financial penalty be for cutting him? If it is just $4mil sign me up.
I do not understand why our media does not get on him as much as they did with Mench or Nix.
32 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Now I know I haven't been a Botts fan
by aggierangerfan00 on Mar 26, 2007 12:42 PM CDT reply actions
Wilk
Wilk .227/.320/.341
X .265/.306/.353
Do you think we should just cut both of them?
I'll admit that I've been about as supportive of Wilk as AJM, mostly because the Rangers needed to get rid of Soriano (if you predicted Soriano's 2006 season, congrats to you). I'll agree that Wilk needs to improve this season, but there's no reason on earth to cut him for nothing.
HAHAHA
If he makes this team I will most likely move forward on my Wilkerson T-shirt design from last year. The one with a backwards K in the Superman symbol. With his number on the back. I will then try and buy the first row of LF and heckle him. The thought of him walking up to the plate during our home opener will force me to the concourse to buy 2 beers right after I vomit.
you are a true fan
I am a true fan
so
that was in jest?
Yes
thats the difference
I know he played for Montreal/Washington
:) - Obligatory smiley showing I don't mean whatever mean
spiritedness is likely contained in the preceding post
Well
because prior to last year when he had season
:) - Obligatory smiley showing I don't mean whatever mean
spiritedness is likely contained in the preceding post
okay
Heh ...
by Ed Coffin on Mar 26, 2007 1:39 PM CDT reply actions
That is ridiculous
If
Just a hint. I'll use the example of the Big Red Machine of Cincinnati back in the'70's. There were five starters and maybe eleven guys on their 25 roster who were considered sort of famous for their team's accomplishments. But might not have made the roster of a few other MLB teams at the time. The four great position players and four adequate or better pitchers set the stage for the rest of that crew to appear to be excellent. Good, yes. Far short of excellent IMO. And I used to say things like why the he11 don't they have a better CF'er than Geronim (for example), even knowing he had a great arm and adequate range.
Wilkerson doens't get a pass because he had an onerous injury. It's an excuse, and he and I and you know that. He's better (even partly recovered, like now) than his apparent contribution.
Dang! I overspoke ... sorry for the long post.
by Ed Coffin on Mar 26, 2007 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions
Of course I will support him
by aggierangerfan00 on Mar 26, 2007 1:45 PM CDT up reply actions
So,
who's not pulling for him?
Wilkerson is almost the exact opposite where he was handed a spot and has had a bad spring (like a few other regulars). I just think its silly to not support his roster spot without seeing him against regular season pitching.
A Bad spring
a year and half
i wonder if wilkerson was aware that he was trying to impress people in march.
What
well
as for strikeouts - i don't think its all that crucial to his game to cut down strikeouts. keep it reasonable, yes, but in his 2004 good year he was 4th in strikeouts. he's always been a league leader.
Hmm
A good spring
He has already proven that he will say he is healthy, whether he is or isn't.
no
well
for me, the line is that
If Wilkerson were an NRI who would have to bump somebody off the 25/40 man roster to make the team I might feel a bit different.
To me, its more difficult for a guy to play his way off the 25 man roster than it is for a guy to play his way on the roster (That said, I think Sosa has played his way on).
:) - Obligatory smiley showing I don't mean whatever mean
spiritedness is likely contained in the preceding post

by 
















