Good luck Tex
Let me start this by saying that I agree that Tex needed to be traded for the future of the team. He wasn't going to re-sign here so trading him was the right thing to do in this wasted season. I also think they got a very good return for him in the trade and that JD should get some props for that.
Now, to all the pinheads who are blogging on the DMN website and calling The Ticket, and the Ticket hosts saying good riddance and calling Teixeira everything from a cancer to an empty numbers guy to the reason the Rangers aren't a good team.......I would like to invite you to go have relations with yourselves.
0 recs |
19 comments
Comments
LOL
Evan Grant's story on the trade is up- he said the Angels' best offer was Kotchman and Saunders, and that the Dodgers only offered two players- I'm guessing Loney and Ethier.
If those were the alternatives, I'm pretty pleased with what Daniels was able to acquire. It also sounds like Harrison could be the fourth player, but Grant said we may not know who it is until the end of the season.
by RCCook on Jul 30, 2007 9:44 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
according to Talking Chop
by rubbersoul103 on Jul 30, 2007 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
no
if he isnt, well then i guess they will take someone else as the player to be named later from whatever list they have.
by DSheppard on Jul 30, 2007 9:55 PM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hear, hear
by FirebatM3 on Jul 30, 2007 10:15 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Well put
by Ed Coffin on Jul 30, 2007 10:50 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
word
by trza on Jul 30, 2007 10:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Of course
It's always the way it goes, in order to get rid of a guy LSB must make him the "bad guy". Pudge, Juan, Raffy, Tex, Kenny Rogers, Sorianio (hell, ya'll wrotre ten thousand books on Soriano, you hated him so much)and many lesser players along the way.
It will, already has, happened with Blalock too. It would happen with Young if you could figure out a way to get rid of him. It'll happen with Saltalamacchia if he's any good.
I mean seriously, what the hell?
The one thing none of you care about is baseball and the Rangers winning.
Most of you hate the Cowboys, also.
by Sharky on Jul 31, 2007 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Hey, Shark
by Adam J. Morris on Jul 31, 2007 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't confuse him
Just enjoy his stream of sharkiness.
by DJCahill on Jul 31, 2007 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Two thumbs up J D !!!
by NYCMuscleFag on Jul 30, 2007 11:07 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Seriously, where do you get this stuff?
And the fact that a player wants to win, and is vocal about it in a couple of newspaper articles per year does not make him "bitter." Is the player supposed to turn cartwheels when his team is sucking and appears not to have any worthwhile direction? That's just silly.
by Athos on Jul 31, 2007 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tex is a notorious slow starter...
If like Evan Grant says "what the Rangers would like most out of Teixera is constency" obviously it was a bone of contention. If Tex had been consistant and knocked in some of those runs in April and May that he typically saves up for August and Sept.(and yes the Rangers are usually out of it by then) then the Rangers would of been even more in contention if not in the lead which would of at least giving them a fighting chance.
Theres lots of players who aren't happy with the way their teams are playing. But can you imagine if they all started talking shit about managementand playing for Baltimore, and it was more than twice. I don't expect cartwheels thats a bit of an extreme but it would of been nice if he'd of dealt with it with a little bit of decorum and class. The bottom line is - its much better to put a team on the field that actually wants to be there then one who can't wait to play for someone else. How can his attitude of possibly been a plus ? The Rangers scored more runs and had a higher winning percentage without him and i expect that to contine.
by NYCMuscleFag on Jul 31, 2007 1:27 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
You are dead on
by DJCahill on Jul 30, 2007 11:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Yup
by bushe on Jul 31, 2007 6:25 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I heard more people calling
Public opinion was clearly more anti-Rangers in this.
by Sharky on Jul 31, 2007 9:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
hint
by a bebop a rebop on Aug 1, 2007 3:03 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 
















