Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Cal RB Jahvid Best Seriously Injured, Carted Off Field

Interesting Bonds take

EXCLUSIVE: Barry Bonds' Home Run Record Tainted by Mechanical Device

By Michael Witte

Published: August 06, 2007 10:45 AM

NEW YORK (Commentary) Beyond his alleged steroid use, Barry Bonds is guilty of the use of something that confers extraordinarily unfair mechanical advantage: the "armor" that he wears on his right elbow. Amid the press frenzy over Bonds' unnatural bulk, the true role of the object on his right arm has simply gone unnoticed.

This is unfortunate, because by my estimate, Bonds' front arm "armor" may have contributed no fewer than 75 to 100 home runs to his already steroid-questionable total.

Bonds tied Henry Aaron's home run record of 755 on Saturday night and will go for the new standard this week back at home in San Francisco. As a student of baseball - and currently a mechanics consultant to a major league baseball team -- I believe I have insight into the Bonds "achievement." I have studied his swing countless times on video and examined the mechanical gear closely through photographs.

For years, sportswriters remarked that his massive "protective" gear - unequaled in all of baseball -- permits Bonds to lean over the plate without fear of being hit by a pitch. Thus situated, Bonds can handle the outside pitch (where most pitchers live) unusually well. This is unfair advantage enough, but no longer controversial. However, it is only one of at least seven (largely unexplored) advantages conferred by the apparatus.

The other six:

  1. The apparatus is hinged at the elbow. It is a literal "hitting machine" that allows Bonds to release his front arm on the same plane during every swing. It largely accounts for the seemingly magical consistency of every Bonds stroke.
  2. The apparatus locks at the elbow when the lead arm is fully elongated because of a small flap at the top of the bottom section that fits into a groove in the bottom of the top section. The locked arm forms a rigid front arm fulcrum that allows extraordinary, maximally efficient explosion of the levers of Bonds' wrists. Bonds hands are quicker than those of average hitters because of his mechanical "assistant."
  3. When Bonds swings, the weight of the apparatus helps to seal his inner upper arm to his torso at impact. Thus "connected," he automatically hits the ball with the weight of his entire body - not just his arms - as average hitters ("extending") tend to do.
  4. Bonds has performed less well in Home Run Derbies than one might expect because he has no excuse to wear a "protector" facing a batting practice pitcher. As he tires, his front arm elbow tends to lift and he swings under the ball, producing towering pop flies or topspin liners that stay in the park. When the apparatus is worn, its weight keeps his elbow down and he drives the ball with backspin.
  5. Bonds enjoys quicker access to the inside pitch than average hitters because his "assistant" - counter-intuitively - allows him to turn more rapidly. Everyone understands that skaters accelerate their spins by pulling their arms into their torsos, closer to their axes of rotation. When Bonds is confronted with an inside pitch, he spins like a skater because his upper front arm is "assistant"-sealed tightly against the side of his chest.
  6. At impact, Bonds has additional mass (the weight of his "assistant") not available to the average hitter. The combined weight of "assistant" and bat is probably equal to the weight of the lumber wielded by Babe Ruth but with more manageable weight distribution.
Bonds has worn some sort of front arm protection since 1992. In '94, a one-piece forearm guard was replaced by a jointed, two piece elbow model. In `95 it got bigger and a small "cap" on the elbow was replaced by a "flap" that overlapped the upper piece and locked the two pieces together when the arm was elongated. In '96, the "apparatus" grew even larger and so did the "flap."

It seems to have remained relatively the same until -- interestingly-- 2001, the year of his record 73 home runs, when an advanced model appeared made (apparently) of a new material. It had softer edges and a groove for the flap to slip into automatically at full arm elongation. More important, the upper half of the machine was sculpted to conform more comfortably to the contours of Bonds' upper arm. Since 2001, the apparatus seems to have remained relatively unchanged.

Several years back, baseball was rightfully scandalized by the revelation that Sammy Sosa had "corked" his bat. The advantages conferred by the Bonds "hitting machine," however, far exceed anything supplied by cork. Ultimately, it appears the Bonds "achievement" must be regarded as partly the product of "double duplicity" -- steroidal and mechanical.

0 recs  |  Comment 47 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Some people...
...need to have their heads examined....
Put Mayberry Jr. back at First Base.

by Jukebox Joe on Aug 6, 2007 3:05 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

interesting
Original link?
Lick by lick, mountains erode

by RangerMoto on Aug 6, 2007 3:08 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Link...
Here you go:

http://tinyurl.com/2bbcoa

"Hello, win column..."

by rangersfan34 on Aug 6, 2007 3:39 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

a reach
my thought, exactly.  I hadn't seen Bonds hit in a while, but when I watched the video of the record-tying HR I was once again struck by the bat speed and power of that swing.  That thing on his arm didn't do that.  It's not as if this guy is hitting a bunch of balls that just barely clear the fence.
mmmmmm...64 slices of American cheese...

by t ball on Aug 6, 2007 3:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

blame the league
for letting him use it.
buffering....

by SteveP on Aug 6, 2007 3:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Bonds
I hear he's also more physically talented than most human beings. Clearly, this gives him an unfair advantage!
"Then I met some friends for a beer, went to a BoDeans's concert, and son of a vondruke, if I didn't leave him at the concert hall."

by RCCook on Aug 6, 2007 4:07 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He's also been held down by the man
His angst at the hands of racial discrimination has raised his rage level to a point that is beyond the realm of reality for the less-raged players of black/white/hispanic/Asian race who have not been held down by the man and therefore cannot call forth the anger-driven power and energy that Bonds can, thus giving God Bonds a wholly-unfair advantage over those players held in higher regard by whitey.

Plus, he's a hemmorhoid on the asshole of society.

Just thought I'd throw that in.

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Also...
...did you know that his Godfather is Willie Mays?

Just thought you all should now in case you've missed it one of the 4,000 times or so that Bonds has dropped the name.

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Have to test it
Put it on another player of similar physique.

Have three league average pitchers throw nothing but fastballs, with a focus on inside and outside.

Then test the same three pitchers against the guinea pig hitter.  Figure out a stochastic model to reduce chance and calculate the probability of home runs.

Now that you've spent a few million dollars setting up the test, admit that the custom armor is only an advantage for getting on base.

Time does funny things. The worst of which is, it keeps moving when you don't.

by Ed Coffin on Aug 6, 2007 4:27 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

"stochastic"
Admit it, Ed, you made that word up...
I will not get my comeuppance!

by Brian Thomas on Aug 6, 2007 8:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No matter how you feel ...
... about the whole steroid situation, drugs don't help you see the ball better, anticipate what pitch is coming, or improve the mechanics of your swing to make you hit more. You either have those things or you don't, steroids won't help that. Neither will some elbow armour.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 4:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Please clarify.
If we're assuming Bonds did steroids, are you saying they didn't contribute to his power explosion in his  late 30's which has allowed him to break (or tie) two different homerun records?  I'm just not understanding your position here and would appreciate some clarification.

by Athos on Aug 6, 2007 4:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

of course not...
it's perfectly normal for a guy in his mid-30's who has averaged a HR every 16 ABs to immediately start hitting them out every 9 ABs.

It's the product of working out harder than everyone else.  Bonds just wanted it more.

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Aug 6, 2007 4:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Inventions
I take umbrage with your ranking system:

Boobs>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ;>>>>TiVo=Baseball

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 4:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think
What he's saying is that even if Bonds did steroids, he still had to put the bat on the ball. Plenty of other players have done steroids-I'm betting some have done as many as Bonds, if not more- and none of them have done what he's done.

A power spike is not a 100% indicator that a guy's using steroids, either.

Case in point: Roger Maris. Here are his season-by-season HR totals: 14, 28, 16, 39, 61, 33, 23, 26, 8, 13, 9, 5. If a guy went from 16 HR to 39 to 61 in two seasons today, he'd be accused of cheating by a large majority of fans and writers.

Hank Aaron's highest single-season HR total came when he was 37. It's definitely not the norm, but greatness isn't normal. That's why it's greatness.

"Then I met some friends for a beer, went to a BoDeans's concert, and son of a vondruke, if I didn't leave him at the concert hall."

by RCCook on Aug 6, 2007 4:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is ...
... exactly what I was saying, thanks. If all it took was just steroids to hit home runs, every schmuck in the country would be lining up to become a ballplayer. It simply doesn't work that way.

Hey, I dislike Bonds as much as the next person. But to say that he accomplished what he did ONLY because of steroids (and especially body armour) is to be in denial.

And also to clarify, it's what SHE said. I am a girl. :)

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 5:06 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Hah...you're a girl
Your credibility has instantly gone to 'Zilch'.

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 5:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Why ...
... would be credibility be zilch?

I guess my boss at the minor league sports publication I freelance for needs to be informed of my zilch credibility status and fire me.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sorry
We don't get many girls around these parts, so I always assume everyone's a guy unless told otherwise.

I still liked your take on Bonds, though! :)

"Then I met some friends for a beer, went to a BoDeans's concert, and son of a vondruke, if I didn't leave him at the concert hall."

by RCCook on Aug 6, 2007 5:10 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's not a big deal ...
... trust me, I am very used to people mistaking me for a male on message boards, my handle is fairly gender neutral.

And thanks for not letting my gender affect your opinion of me, unlike tlt29. Hopefully he is the only one, though.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 5:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Heh...
I was joking in my credibility post.

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 5:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Oh good ...
... I was hoping that was it. I would hate to have to go hormonal on you, like us emotional women do sometimes. :)

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 5:28 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Minor League Sports Pub
Who do you freelance for?

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I am a copy editor/writer ...
... for "Minor League News." I love it. We just recently released our own list of the top 50 minor leaguers. Hurley is in at no. 9.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 5:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very cool
I write for Rotojunkie.com and also do a monthly column for Jamey Newberg's site, so it's always good to meet other people in the industry.

Is Minor League News based out of San Antonio?

"Then I met some friends for a beer, went to a BoDeans's concert, and son of a vondruke, if I didn't leave him at the concert hall."

by RCCook on Aug 6, 2007 6:23 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I wish it was based out of here! ...
... It's based out of Palm Beach County, Florida. That is where the offices are. But they have writers/editors such as myself all over the country. I am getting ready to pitch a story on Coolbaugh, since it is obviously related to the minors and I know people who went to school with him here in SA. Let's see if they pick it up.

Hey, if you ever want to pitch a story idea for the online magazine, you can email my boss, brianross@minorleaguenews.com

If he gives you the green light, you get paid .20/word for your story. Not huge money but certainly something nice to put in your pocket. He can also arrange for press credentials if you need them for your story, such as for interviews, etc.

Jamey's site is the shit, being in San Antonio, there is little to no Rangers coverage so being able to go online and read sites like the Newberg Report is awesome.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

My apologies ...
... for posting all of that here, but this site doesn't have a private messaging function. I just realized I probably should have sent that to you privately.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Don't worry about it
Here at LSB, we have lower expectations for skirts...

Heh...:)

I will not get my comeuppance!

by Brian Thomas on Aug 6, 2007 8:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You are lucky ...
... that I am not PMSing, or I might take offense to that. I am already pissy because I broke a nail today!

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 9:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Thanks
I'm always on the lookout for writing outlets, so if I can think of a subject, I'll definitely drop him a line.
"Then I met some friends for a beer, went to a BoDeans's concert, and son of a vondruke, if I didn't leave him at the concert hall."

by RCCook on Aug 6, 2007 9:02 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would actually call Maris fairly normal
at least his best years occurred in his prime.

24 years old - 16 HR (every 27 AB)
25 years old - 33 HR (every 13 AB)
26 years old - 61 HR (every 10 AB)
27 years old - 39 HR (every 18 AB)

Yes, it's a spike in production, but it's not happening in his late 30's.

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Aug 6, 2007 6:55 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One thing...
The word is that some of the drugs Bonds was taking were made to help improve vision.

As for not improving the mechanics of your swing, I don't think I agree with you.

Wouldn't one think that a stronger man would be able to whip a bat through the strike zone quicker than a weaker man? I know my bat speed is far superior that my 5-year-old son's. I proved it at the batting cage last weekend - I out hit the crap out of him. That's because I'm much stronger.

Then, if you have quicker bat speed, wouldn't one think that would allow the hitter to wait a split-second longer on a pitch, thus enabling said hitter more time to adjust to a pitch he had not been anticipating?

Just some things that make you go "hmm...'

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 5:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

One question...
...if 'roids don't "help you see the ball better, anticipate what pitch is coming, or improve the mechanics of your swing to make you hit more", then why is everyone doing them?

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 5:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

They are doing them ...
... for power. Distance. I never said they didn't help you hit home runs. I said they are not the only thing needed to hit a HR. There IS skill involved, the Incredible Hulk can swing a bat harder than anyone, but can he actually put the bat to the ball or hit a changeup or a curve?

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Power
It's a result of swing mechanics. These players are on the roids to alter swing mechanics (i.e. more bat speed) to generate more power resulting in more home runs.

Yes, there is skill involved. Bonds has it. There's no doubt about it. But I'm not going to blow aside the roids crap simply because he was a first-ballot HOF before the juice baased simply on his skills.

Also, if Hulk had a hitting coach, I'm quite certain he could hit the curve or change. And he could hit them a long way in those kickass purple cutoff shorts.

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 5:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I never said ...
... that anyone should just blow off the steroids issue. Never ever. I simply said that to say that steroids were the ONLY reason for Bonds' success is denial at it's finest.

Power is not a direct result of swing mechanics. They are certainly not mutually exclusive, but they are not exclusively dependent upon each other, either.

And the hulk would eclipse Bonds in less than five years if Rudy Jaramillo was his hitting coach. But it would still take him several years to learn how to see a curve, or anticipate what pitch comes next. These things don't happen overnight, and only skilled players (regardless of power) can do these things.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yes or no, would Bonds be tied with Aaron ...
... right now if he hadn't done the roids?  Would he have broken the single season HR record?

Don't get me wrong, Bonds was a HOF player before the roids issue ever came up, but my logical side has to question whether he could have accomplished what he accomplished at the age he accomplished it had he not been receiving chemical help.  Do you disagree?

by Athos on Aug 6, 2007 6:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You bring up a good point ...
... however, there is no way to answer this question. And therein lies crux of this whole problem.

The thing is, we can ask "what if ..." and such questions ad naueseum. What if Bonds wasn't juiced, would he have reached Aaron's record?

Well, what if Aaron played in a home run graveyard like PETCO or Comerica Park, against pitchers who were also juiced, against outfielders with far superior foot speed and athleticism than their yesteryear counterparts? What if Aaron hadn't taken greenies? What if Aaron had batted in the era of situational pitchers or hard-throwing closers? Would his numbers have taken a dip?

The point is, we will simply never know. But that does not diminish the fact that Bonds has a talent that few of his contemporaries (juiced or not) can match.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 7:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Wow.
That might have been the longest non-answer I've ever read.  Are you saying you don't have an opinion?  If so, a simple "I don't have an opinion" would have sufficed.

by Athos on Aug 6, 2007 7:46 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I gave you my opinion ...
... my opinion is that this question can not be answered, at least not without bias and without raising a ton of other questions. It's the baseball equivalent of Pandora's Box.

Let me again point out that I am no Bonds fan. I am very conflicted as a fan about the whole fiasco. However, I don't let my emotions over it get in the way of the fact that the man has a talent that can't be denied. If it ONLY took steroids to hit a home run, everyone would be able to do so.

I never said he deserved the record. I never said I liked it. All I am saying is that steroids alone will not get anyone to 755.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 7:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah but
The minors are full of guys that can see the ball, but have warning-track power...that's where steroids come in to play.

by cosa on Aug 6, 2007 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Bonds' baseball success.
His success as a baseball player is not the result of steroids. He was absolutely one of the greatest players ever before the steroids.

His success in breaking the home run record is the result exclusively of his steroid use.

He had the skills previously, and he was not a threat to break any home run records.

The steroids resulted in the record.

by tlt29 on Aug 6, 2007 5:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I enjoyed that take ...
... right up until the part about Chase Utley. That hit me right in my fantasy team gut.

by Melmart1 on Aug 6, 2007 6:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Kinsicon_small
My "Newberg Report" cover artwork - Wallpapers & stuff

Recent FanPosts

Cjkrunk_small
NFL Week 9 GDT 2
Barcodes_small
NFL Week 9 GDT
Rsz_200px-heeseopchoi_20050515_small
Goldstein on Borbon
Feliz_holland_hunter_small
AFL Rising Stars Game Thread
Ea_small
OT: CFB 11/07
Franklin_4_lg_small
Mass Murder at Fort Hood
Tcuhomecoming2008_small
Whither Godzilla?
Tbone_small
Fire up the hot stove
Costa_rica_fishing_2b_small
Playoff Refunds Revisited - five days left
Cjkrunk_small
Mavs GDT- 11/3/09 vs Utah; 11/4/09 @ NO

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris