Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Purdue wins Paradise Jam Tournament 73-72

The Joy of Sexson, or, a 2008 1B Possibility

Derek Zumsteg thinks the Mariners are going to try to dump Richie Sexson this offseason.  Zumsteg suggests that the organization wants Adam Jones to be an everyday player in 2008, and to accomplish that, they'd have to make room for Jones.  Moving Sexson would allow an outfield of Jones, Ichiro and Guillen (which would be scary-good, defensively), with either Vidro or Ibanez playing 1B, and the other being the DH.

That makes sense, as Sexson is expensive, has one year left on his deal, and appears to definitely be out of favor with the fans.

Which gets me wondering...wouldn't it make sense for the Rangers to at least kick the tires on Sexson?

Let's assume that Jarrod Saltalamacchia is the regular catcher next year (which, I think, is the way the organization is leaning).  Jason Botts seems to have the inside track on the 2008 DH job, and Ron Washington spoke of a Frank Catalanotto/Marlon Byrd platoon in LF, which I think is probably the best way to utilize those two guys.

The team is going to go hard after someone to play CF next year, be it Torii Hunter, Aaron Rowand, Mike Cameron, or whomever.  

That leaves right field and first base.  The options in the free agent market at both positions are pretty weak, and at this point, I wouldn't be surprised if David Murphy ends up starting in right field next year (or a Murphy/Nelson Cruz platoon).

Which leaves first base.  Brad Wilkerson has been talked about as a solution, but he seems more of a part-time player at this point, a guy who you could bring back to split time at first base with Saltalamacchia if you want to have Gerald Laird be the regular catcher while Salt E is the backup, or maybe sharing time in the outfield.

And the free agent options are poor...plus, you have to think Chris Davis is going to be knocking on the door at the end of 2008, so you don't necessarily want to be tied long-term to a middling first baseman.

Sexson is owed $14 million for 2008.  That's a lot of money.  Particularly for a guy who has hit as poorly as he has this year.

Sexson is hitting .205/.295/.399 this year, good for a .238 EQA.  And it isn't just that Safeco sucks for hitters...he's hitting .225/.312/.394 on the road this year.  

But...he's just 32 years old.  He's not ancient.  He was a .264/.338/.504 guy last year, with a .279 EQA, and had a .308 EQA the year before.  Will Carroll says there's no telling how much his hamstring problems contributed to his hitting problems this year, and this could just be another case of a guy with old player skills falling off the cliff in his early 30s.

Still...if you use line drive percentage plus .120 as an estimate of what a batter's expected BABIP should be, you can argue that Sexson has been unusually unlucky...he has a 14.9% LD%, but a .217 BABIP, over 50 points worse than would be expected.  If you look at his historical stats, the only time he's deviated so sharply from his expected BABIP is in 2004, when he had a 15.9% LD% and a .200 BABIP.  

And of course, he followed up his extremely disappointing 2004 season with a very good 2005 season.

His pitch data shows that he's seeing fewer pitches per plate appearance than he has historically, but his contact rate when he swings is actually up a little...unlike, say, Brad Wilkerson, who has since his swing-and-miss percentage go up the last couple of years, Sexson is making contact as consistently as ever.  

How has Sexson hit, historically, in TBIA?  Not too good....260/.358/.449, about 50 OPS points below his career averages.  

But here's what interesting to me...Sexson, despite being a righthanded hitter, looks like a pretty good fit for TBIA.  Check out his BIP chart for the last few years (choose Safeco Field, since that's obviously where he'll have the most BIP data).  Quite a few homers to right and right-center, and quite a few deep fly outs to right-center.  Those are the types of balls that, in the hot summers at TBIA, can get up in the jetstream and end up in the Ranger bullpen.

Looking at his BIP data from 2003-2006, Sexson never had as much as 20% of his fly balls go to left field in a single year (ranging from 14.6% to 19.5%), while the average righty has 22.3% of his fly balls go to left field.  And Sexson hits an above-average percentage of balls in the air, which helps, as well.

Looking at all this, Sexson is someone who seems like he could be a decent value pick, someone who you could pick up for nothing more than taking his contract (even though Zumsteg says Detroit claimed Sexson on waivers this summer, and Seattle pulled him back).  

Could the Rangers afford it?  Absolutely.  They aren't signing any free agent pitchers.  ARod is likely opting out, saving $7 million.  The Michael Young contract extension doesn't kick in until after 2008.  The Rangers could easily afford to moneywhip Torii Hunter or Aaron Rowand and still add all of Sexson's salary, even if the M's didn't want to pick any of it up.

Why would Texas do that?  It fills a gaping hole in next year's lineup.  It gives you a pretty decent candidate for a bounceback year who could hit cleanup and balance out a fairly lefty-heavy lineup.  And if Sexson does bounce back, he could be a pretty valuable trade chip if you aren't in contention come July, 2008.  

This is just speculation on my part, and Zumsteg could be wrong, and the M's could be dead set on having Richie Sexson as their 2008 first baseman.  Or it could be that a contender sees Sexson as having value, and is willing to give up a nice prospect for him (since I don't think the Rangers would give up anything more than an organizational depth guy to get him).

But this is the type of deal that I could see the Rangers making, and that I'd hope they'd be in on, should Sexson be available.

0 recs  |  Comment 40 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Im up for anything
If our pitching comes back around.

If its like this year though, its all for nothing.

by TexGoesYard on Sep 18, 2007 8:30 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Even if he does
bounce back, he still would be an awfully expensive mediocre 1B.  In a way, though, if the plan is to have Davis suit up there in 2009 then it almost doesn't matter who plays 1B in '08.

I agree that this is the kind of deal the Rangers should be considering for 1B next year (or my Huber speculation or some such), and I always enjoy this kind of post when you get deep into detailed data that most don't consider.

Baseball Fever - catch it!

by t ball on Sep 18, 2007 8:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

risk/reward
if you saw a resurgance due to a change in scenery, his work ethics and approach towards next season to bounce back, working with Rudy, hitting in TBIA, etc. and his value shot back up, wouldn't $14 million (essentially $7 million) be worth it to fill a gap for half a year, give us a chance at winning some ballgames and a potential trade chip?  much like Gagne?  What if we raised his value enough to get back a decent SP prospect and another Andrus/Beltre type player at the break?  I'm all for it, spend Hicks' money some way or another, don't let him get off the hook...
"No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of."

by Walter Sobchak on Sep 19, 2007 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sexon
Eh.  That's all I can say.  If they can get him for nothing, fine.  I like the fact that he walks but I'm worried he won't do that anymore once he joins the Jarimillo regime.
Ctrl - V

by Dustin on Sep 18, 2007 8:36 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pretty much my thoughts...
if we can add him for what amounts to night, I say why not.  However, I'd hope we have the mindset that if it doesn't work out, get rid of him, and not have him hang around all year sucking.
Stars in a Texas Night Sky, a Dallas Stars blog from a fan's perspective.

by rangers85 on Sep 18, 2007 9:04 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

oh yeah
Now that's a title.
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Sep 18, 2007 8:55 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Pass
there's no point ... Ben Broussard? Maybe.

Cheaper stopgaps are available, and I wouldn't want him potentially blocking Davis if he is ready by July.

"This is Baseball, it ain't Golf. If you aren't cheating in baseball, you aren't trying nearly hard enough to win." - DJCahill

by Chase Irwin on Sep 18, 2007 9:10 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

NO WAY!!
Sexson is horrible.  14 mil for rich man's Botts?  NFW!!

by BillyBobisdrunk on Sep 18, 2007 9:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well
I'm thinking most of us are operating under the assumption that SEA will be paying quite a bit of that salary.
Ctrl - V

by Dustin on Sep 19, 2007 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Data
is there a site somewhere where you could find individual line drive data for individuals for each year?

by mstang20 on Sep 18, 2007 9:39 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

ew!
You are hearing me talk.

by SteveP on Sep 18, 2007 10:31 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm actually open to it ....
if Seattle will eat half his contract....if not then pass, but 7 mil for one year even if he falters would not be much more of a loss than giving that $ to Whiffy. Plus if he comes out of the gates hot maybe he could be flipped by the ASB.

Could give Davis one year to get ready if they do switch him to first....considering other 1st base options would not be a horrible stop-gap, again if we don't take the full 14 mil!

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Sep 18, 2007 11:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

more strikeouts
We could use a few more strikeouts. Is Incavigilia available, as well?
Mariano Rivera? Nope - I'll take Dale Mohorcic anyday....

by woodenskillet on Sep 18, 2007 11:16 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Hell No!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

by slash on Sep 19, 2007 5:19 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I couldn't watch that guy play
no matter how much we're paying him......would rather have Cat/Wilk play there......or have a trade in the works.....

by slash on Sep 19, 2007 5:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Terrible Idea
What the hell has gotten into you, Adam?  

At least Wilkerson can work the count and take a few walks to go along with his plentiful strikeouts and sub-pedestrian average.  Plus, he'll do it for a lot less money.

by jester on Sep 19, 2007 7:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

wilkerson
i had the same thoughts. sure wilkerson isn't ideal but he'll be a hell of a lot cheaper for a 1yr deal
Can you please Look into getting a less funny signature? That's sarcasm, btw. - Sharky

by rentz on Sep 19, 2007 8:27 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a trick
Adam is using to get you to like Wilkerson better.

:P

'At Georgia Southern, we don't cheat. That costs money and we don't have any.' Erk Russell / Georgia Southern

by Ed Coffin on Sep 19, 2007 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You're kidding, right?
Wilkerson has only had one season that's better than Sexson's average season, by OPS+. Sexson draws plenty of walks. Plus he used to hit a lot of home runs.
Now I'm not gonna root one way or the other on this, and if we actually we acquire him I'll be crossing my fingers all the way, just 'cause of the slugger-falling-off-the-table-at-32 pattern. But to argue that Wilkerson is better is pretty nuts.

by a bebop a rebop on Sep 20, 2007 8:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wilkerson
I wouldnt say he's "better" but he's certainly cheaper. myself, i just see no point in trading for a guy who could be on a major decline and is due 14mil (unless they eat at least half the salary and take a nobody prospect in exchange)
Can you please Look into getting a less funny signature? That's sarcasm, btw. - Sharky

by rentz on Sep 20, 2007 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Only if they throw in
my good friend Travis Chick.

I dont see them dealing him to us, unless they think we wont contend for a couple of years AND his career is basically over.

by Nichols22 on Sep 19, 2007 8:36 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I cant believe
my ears.  Adam, will you put Dunn's #'s next to Sexons and tell us that all again?  

by corbsclinton on Sep 19, 2007 8:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wilkerson, Sexson
No difference, both pretty much suck as everyday ballplayers. How could anyone pay Sexson after the season he has had?

by rldwb on Sep 19, 2007 8:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

You're Right
Sexson has been rather unlucky, and does if we could get him on the cheap then I'd consider this a positive move.  He's been hurt this season, but was a 120-140 OPS+ guy for the prior six seasons.  That would be an improvement over Wilkerson, so if Seattle could pay some of the contract and we were on tab for 8 million or so, I'd be okay.  I don't see that happening though, and I don't think the Rangers can justify taking a flyer on a guy for 14 million.

by rangeressary on Sep 19, 2007 8:59 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

yeah
i'd be ok with it if seattle eats half the salary, but i see 0 point in trading for a guy making 14mil if the other team wont eat a large chunk.
Can you please Look into getting a less funny signature? That's sarcasm, btw. - Sharky

by rentz on Sep 19, 2007 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the guy
looks like he should be an intimadationg player at the plate.  He looks like he could mash the ball 800 yards.  But then he takes that pussy swing, and strikes out.  No way does sexon fit into the rangers plan for 08.  That my friends, would be daniels worst move as GM.

by NYTXFAN on Sep 19, 2007 9:58 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Worst move?
You're joking I'm sure.  Hands down the worst deal in a LONG time was the San Diego debacle.  Also, I think 5/65 for the Ho blows away Sexy for 1/14.

However, the best deal in 10 years happened at this year's deadline when we shipped Gagne to Beantown.  Seriously, how good has that deal worked out for the Rangers? I guess Gagne really only wants to be a closer.  I mean could he be sucking worse since the ASB?  Is it all because he can't be a set-up guy.  I just don't understand the mentality of "if the game isn't on the line, I can't get batters out." Dude, you're a friggin professional, act like one.

Sorry about the rant, I just needed to get it out there so it didn't corrupt my mind anymore.

by Parman on Sep 19, 2007 10:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Chan Ho
wasnt a JOhn Daniel Deal.

by NYTXFAN on Sep 19, 2007 10:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Blalock....
despite the denials, will be playing first base next season 'cause he can't throw.  There appears to be more problems with his arm than he or the Rangers are willing to admit.  

by doolindalton on Sep 19, 2007 10:09 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm all for it
you're talking about a guy that if he isn't in a total tailspin of his career (the risk here), is a lock for 35+ HR, 110+ RBI, a pretty good amount of walks, .260+ average and a near-.900 OPS for a one year rental that could become a pretty nice trading chip at the ASB if we're out of contention and he's back up to his standards of hitting.  If they Yanks don't do anything at 1B between now and then, we can ALWAYS pawn him off on them...

plus, even if they don't put the bat on the ball, can you imagine pitching back-to-back to 6'8" 237 pound Sexson and then 6'5" 250 pound Jason Botts?  And let's say Chris Davis gets a callup (6'3" 210 pounds - looks like a serial killer) and joins the team and Nelson Cruz  sticks around at 6'3" 230 pounds, I might just pee my pants every time that part of the lineup comes to the plate

throw in Kam Loe, Brandon McCarthy and Scott Feldman and we'd be able to field a pretty good basketball team if nothing else...

"No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of."

by Walter Sobchak on Sep 19, 2007 10:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

you forgot
The salt giant(6'4" 230)

by bushe on Sep 19, 2007 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah
I saw the 6'4, but he's listed as 195, and I could take out a 6'4 195 pounder...Nick Swisher-style
"No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of."

by Walter Sobchak on Sep 19, 2007 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.....
Sexson, Botts, Cruz, Loe & Feldman should try fielding a basketball team. Baseball ain't their game.

by tklawless on Sep 19, 2007 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is an amusing scheme
to get Jeff from Lookout Landing to hate the entire Rangers infield...

by JBImaknee on Sep 19, 2007 10:53 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Th_buckykatt_small
MNF tonight
Cd_small
Jordan Schafer Available?
Marion_small
NFL Week 11 GDT
Roger_the_alien_american_dad_small
Josh Johnson Available?
Ochomerun_small
Who is Josey Wales?
Marion_small
Mavs GDT 11/20/09--11/24/09
Ebbsfleet_united_logo_small
Three way deal only works if...
Small
OT: The global warming hoax exposed?
Img_0225_2_small
Pertinent Fangraphs Articles
Texas-rangers-logo-2_small
Frankie Piliere scouting for fans now

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris