OT: NFL All-Pro selections are in...
http://www.nfl.com/news/story?id=09000d5d805db597&template=with-video&confirm=true
Three pokes on the ist team, 2 on the 2nd.
A few thoughts:
The only selections I have any real problem with are 1st team RB and Al Harris. LT rode in on his rep this time, gold glove style.
You have to think Romo would have made 2nd team if he hadn't stumbled so much in the last month.
If we could money whip Samuels (or Trufant) into signing w/ us next year, how big of a leap could we make? Draft another CB or FS and a receiver in the 1st rd, and we'd be sans holes.
And all those Leonard Davis signing poo-pooers look pretty stupid now (actually, they've looked dumb for months).
That is all...
0 recs |
29 comments
Comments
This isn't
Deal is that the Patriots are cheap and probably won't offer much...
by miles on Jan 10, 2008 9:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
But somebody else will...
I like that plan, but it worries me how much you would have invested in CB's since Henry (who hasn't been bad this year...solid for a No.2 CB when healthy) is still on the books for next year. Here's what I would do differently though: Sign Nnamdi Asomugha from Oak. He'll be a free agent, is much less highly touted (because the Raiders are so bad), not that much worse than Samuels, but should be MUCH cheaper. The only thing that worries me is that he's a big guy who plays well when he can be physical with receivers, and Wade has been playing his CB's in soft coverage a lot this year to prevent the big play.
We'll see. I'm hoping that GM's around the league buy the hype on Trufant and Samuels (only Samuels is worth it) and spend big bucks on them while letting Asomugha slip through the cracks. The Cowboys won't have as much to spend as other teams (although it's still a decent amount) because they are trying to sign some of their restricted free agents for the next year still (Barber, Canty).
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 10, 2008 9:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
We should pay the price
by miles on Jan 10, 2008 9:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Newman
He's creeping up into his 30s, iirc.
by hightowersmith on Jan 10, 2008 9:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Newman just turned..
But there's really only one dominant CB right now (Bailey). There are other who are good from year to year, but it varies. It's hard to find people who play at all-pro levels year in and year out, and I don't think that Samuels is one of those guys. I could be wrong.
Realize that signing Samuels means you lose two of the following three most likely, if not all three: Newman, Barber, Canty.
PS-Message to MLB, do you see how having something more than a luxury tax makes it harder for teams to stockpile talent, thus spreading out the talent more equally, and forcing teams to be better at managing their finances. I'm not saying I'm for a full salary cap in MLB, but it drives me crazy how teams can just spend themselves out of bad contracts with hardly any consequences, while other teams have to let good players go even though they make smart personnel moves.
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 10, 2008 10:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Big differences between MLB and NFL
- MLB players union is strong than the NFLs. They have no incentive to agree to a cap.
- The economics are completely different. The NFL teams get a significantly larger percentage of their revenue through the league from the national TV packages, so all teams are on a much more level playing field revenue wise. The MLB teams derive a very large percentage of their revenues from local cable TV contracts which NFL teams don't have. This allows Green Bay to compete with the Giants much better than it allows the Brewers to compete with the Yankees.
by DJCahill on Jan 10, 2008 10:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not re-signing Newman would be beyond dumb
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 9:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
by Longhorn on Jan 10, 2008 9:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
by BudLight on Jan 10, 2008 10:19 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Leonard Davis
Big question in the offseason (Besides replacing the many execs that Tuna takes away) will be Flozell and whether he deserves a new contract
by Taylor on Jan 10, 2008 9:15 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Samuels is a free-agent
The best bet is to draft a CB in the first round... groom him for a year or two behind Henry, playing the slot next year.
by TheBZA on Jan 10, 2008 9:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Samuels>Newman
by miles on Jan 10, 2008 9:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Debatable
Samuels is going to get that fat contract. I think we have the chance to resign Newman for less. I'd stick with Newman, especially for the discount.
by TheBZA on Jan 10, 2008 9:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Newman
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You should know by now
by DJCahill on Jan 10, 2008 10:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
FYI..............
Of course, I would figure that Heisman Trophy candidate Chase Daniel could get his name pronounced correctly, but that rarely happens, either.
by Hard8 on Jan 11, 2008 8:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LT....
"LT rode in on his rep this time, gold glove style."
Really?????
by jthig32 on Jan 10, 2008 10:58 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
yea I'd like to hear who 'should' have beaten him
Peterson?
Willie Parker?
by cgolden on Jan 10, 2008 11:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Petersen was better.
He may have been the most explosive player in football this year.
After going back and checking, LT did have a better year than I realized. A good deal better.
So I did have Taylor ahead of LT, too, but I think that LT's receiving gives him the nod. So I hereby retract the aforementioned statement. It should have been Petersen and LT.
My bad.
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 11:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Peterson was awesome, don't get me wrong
Adrian Peterson: 5.6 ypc
Chester Taylor: 5.4 ypc
by cgolden on Jan 10, 2008 1:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LDT
That is truly the biggest crock of shit in the NFL.
by hightowersmith on Jan 10, 2008 11:09 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Because of Lawerence Taylor?
The biggest crock of shit would be the Oakland Raiders.
by TheBZA on Jan 10, 2008 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah
I shot my mouth off a little, but that's the real LT.
by hightowersmith on Jan 10, 2008 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You sure do get irate about alot of obscure shit
"That is truly the biggest crock of shit in the NFL."
A little hyperbolic, don't you think? Or is that word not ok, either?
Its not like he's being called "Sweetness" or "The Bus," dude, its his INITIALS.
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Antonio Cromartie
The Carpenter over Cromartie pick is looking a lot like Mayberry over Ellsbury.
by tricer on Jan 10, 2008 11:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
hey i was happy with the pick then
by knockoutking24 on Jan 10, 2008 1:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's not exactly fair..
- The Cowboys were moving fully to a 3-4 which meant Ellis was going to move to OLB. There was no evidence that he would end up being as good as he's been. In fact, this decision started his first grumbling that we had basically ever heard from him. So we needed someone who could play OLB in a 3-4.
- Cromartie had gotten injured and didn't play his entire last year at Florida State. The pick at the time was widely criticized because SD was said to have picked a 'workout warrior' with not enough experience to go in the first round. Fortunately, SD had/has enough talent that they could afford for him to sit on the bench and develop for a couple years.
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 10, 2008 1:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
almost as bad as . . .
by 1man5tools on Jan 11, 2008 11:00 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Careful
by Chase Irwin on Jan 11, 2008 6:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















