Signed and Broken and a Contender?
Jenning: Surgery in August on torn elbow ligament. No way he is ready for ST. takes a year to recover at least.
Fukumori: Hurt last season, recovering from injury. old. unproven.
Milton Bradley: Torn ACL in August or September. 10 months to recover, 1 year to fully recover.
What the hell is going on? The rangers dont actually think these guys will be difference makers?
When do u guys think Bradley and Jennings are 100%? it wont be this season. Why sign these guys if we arent contending and they wont be healthy for the season. I'll give Fukumori the benefit of the doubt, but Jenning and Bradley? there is no way on earth those guys can be 100% this season.
what is the purpose?
23 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Purpose is
Jennings
It was a torn tendon, not a torn ligament. Torn ligament is 12-18 months recovery time. Torn tendon is a lot less. He's supposed to be ready to go by Opening Day.
by Adam J. Morris on Jan 17, 2008 11:24 AM CST reply actions
Thanks AJM
I still think we are way way overestimating Miltons ability to contribute. He's fragile. He's old. He's got a torn ACL to recover from. He aint ever gonna be 'right' for us this year.
I've had a torn ACL. its a 12 month deal to recover 100%. I promise.
Fuku is coming off bone chips removal, im not worried about him as much.
I am concerned that these guys are being counted on and that the rangers expect much more than they will get out of any of them though.
Well to be fair...
I know this is a rarity but look at TO. His injury was a minimum 4 week recovery by the most optimistic of projections for a normal person and he played in 3 weeks with little effects.
by slimshadty12 on Jan 17, 2008 11:52 AM CST up reply actions
agreed slim but
MB has to play 120+ games. I also think injury prone players dont recover that quick. if they were good healers, they wouldnt be injury prone.
If MB had torn his ACL in june id be a lot more optimistic. Late August? Forget it.
I hope Im wrong.
"If they were good healers,
I disagree with this statement. I don't see a connection.
I don't see a conection there either...
by slimshadty12 on Jan 19, 2008 2:40 PM CST up reply actions
"He's old"
Since when is 29 old?
Bradley is 29 and turns 30 in April.
If that is old, I am totally screwed.
by FrazierCranesque on Jan 17, 2008 12:32 PM CST up reply actions
Billy Beane-esque
The Rangers are not a....
small market
+ 1
by NYCMuscleFag on Jan 17, 2008 7:53 PM CST up reply actions
The purpose
You shore up the outfield with Hamilton and Bradley, both of whom are waaaayyy better potentially than the incumbents. Hamilton, especially, has the potential to be the best CF the team has ever had, and he's cheap and under team control. Bradley at least shores up the outfield with a solid bat if he's healthy, and potentially does much more. Jennings is a decent, cheap stopgap, and provides some veteran depth when Milly or Padilla are traded. I don't know what to think of Fukumori, but again, they really don't have much to lose giving him a shot if they believe he has something.
"I'm LBrooks
lol
by thedirkatron on Jan 17, 2008 1:46 PM CST up reply actions
Not a bad......
Everyday Eddy coming off TJ surgery, and Josh Hamilton, a drug addict.
Of all of Junior's off-season moves of signing injury riddled, headcases, and druggies, I'm thinking his best was the guy that he DFA'd - Shelton.
LOL
I'd rather have them DFA shelton
You can't reason
L brooks
causing a shitty outlook on life.
by mrpman on Jan 17, 2008 6:15 PM CST up reply actions
Jim 'Wash Out' Pfaffenbach:
I doubt
by mrpman on Jan 17, 2008 6:36 PM CST up reply actions

by 

















