Open Thread 4 - Politics
272 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hillary somehow closed the gap it appears...
I bet she has
by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 9:06 PM CST up reply actions
I'll repost my comments from the other
Even if Obama wins, I think this highlights that he's a very weak candidate. I salivate over this guy about as much as Hillary Clinton. I think either is very, very weak.
My boy Huckabee held serve, third place>Paul and Giuliani. Not a strong third, but good enough.
If Hillary wins
I expect to see her break down in tears at such catastrophes as her shoelace coming untied, in the near future...
i'm rooting for huckabee
i guess since edwards is out of it, i'll root for obama.
obama vs huck! i wanna see that.
her tearing up
i believe it was genuine. shame on those who thought otherwise. it showed that she is a human being.
barack could still end up winning, though i doubt it. clinton was supposedly down by double digits.
comeback kid part 2
thoughts
suprises:
-huckabee over guilani/paul
-paul is, as of now, 300 behind guilani
-clinton winning so far - i really though obama would pull it out...
by knockoutking24 on Jan 8, 2008 7:38 PM CST reply actions
At this point in Iowa (with <20% in)...
These numbers are mostly from rural areas where Obama doesn't poll as well (most of the populist/progressive support goes to Edwards).
Watch Obama pull out a 3-4% win
I'm actually pretty surprised
by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 7:42 PM CST up reply actions
Uhh
One thing I've noticed tonight on TV, and from Ranger moto here, is "progressive" is the new attenpt by liberals to make a word with a more positive connotation to describe themselves.
Sort of like how it's now no longer "global warming" that is the preffered phrase from the left, because every cold snap makes that phrase look bad, but rather the more ambigous and unprovable "climate change".
Also I've noted with pride that "swift boating" seems to be a new term/idea in politics, because it was so succesful. AKA Hillary Clinton allies were rumored to be about to launch a "swift boat" style attack on Obama..
Looks like John McCain
by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 7:39 PM CST reply actions
and the award
ghostofchrisyoungandjohndanks
www.gaslampball.com
www.southsidesox.com
go there and never come back.
by knockoutking24 on Jan 8, 2008 7:40 PM CST up reply actions
IF this holds up..
Even the exit polls had Obama by five. Of course the same exit polls that Democrats claimed proved George Bush cheated in Ohio.
Ron Paul
I have heard a lot of this shit on LSB...
and anti-gay comments
pathetic...
Wow
Romney looks like that smug neighbor of yours who thinks he runs the block because he leased a Lexus last week.
McCain is just a crazy old man. He physically frightens me.
Guiliani has one catchphrase: "I WAS MAYOR ON 9/11!" Outside of that, he seems very...blah.
Let's go B-Rock.
-1
Boy, the liberal media myth of the beloved unstoppable Obama sure got punctured like a hot air balloon tonight. I love it.
How is he a tool?
LEAVE JOHN McCAIN ALONE
The MAC is back!
by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 7:59 PM CST up reply actions
Ronald Reagan
by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 8:50 PM CST up reply actions
Haha
That is pure greatness, LOLOLOL
i agree
i think you're using the wrong word
no
1 : revealing or marked by a smug, ingratiating, or false earnestness >
2 : of low sleazy taste or quality
I know what you mean
If I have to hear about Edwards father and that mill again, I may break something...
I don't understand.
What do you mean by this? Are you saying Edwards pursued frivolous claims as a plaintiff's lawyer? From what I understand, he's a multi-millionaire because he sued defendants for righteous reasons and made a ton of money doing it. Attorneys that typically sue "anyone for anything" don't remain attorneys for very long because they are either broke or disbarred.
you're right
I honestly can't tell here.
Typical wing-nut comment....
When was the last time a corporation settled out of court & thought they were paying more?
You know...
You call me a wing-nut because I make a sarcastic stereotype joke about Edwards' career? In the same line that I make a sarcastic, stereotype joke about Romney's career? You realize that people in the country make fun of lawyers, right?
Just like the other day when I comment the Republican debate was more entertaining to watch than the democrats because they bickered about the issues? An opinion about entertainment value makes me a right wing hack? Come on, don't be the left-wing balance to Sharky...
Lawyer jokes.
I've never heard the one where the punch line was that a typical trial lawyer would "sue anyone for anything." That's not really a joke. Instead, it is purveying a stereotype which is on par with saying "all black people are on welfare" or "all Jews are money-grubbers." It is a statement founded upon pure ignorance and implies poor character on the part of the target "class."
Hopefully you didn't mean it in that way and just made a VERY poor attempt at being humorous. I'll certainly assume that's the case unless you tell me otherwise.
I think you're going to have trouble
Instead, it is the equivalent to saying "all bankers are greedy" or "all oil guys could care less about the environment." Yes, its a negative stereotype, and obviously a silly one (which was my point, along with the shallow cutthroat businessman reference with Romney), but if you are getting offended to the point of saying it is the equivalent of those racial slurs, then you need to get some perspective.
The devil visited a lawyer's office
"I can arrange some things for you, " the devil said. "I'll increase your income five-fold. Your partners will love you; your clients will respect you; you'll have four months of vacation each year and live to be a hundred.
"All I require in return is that your wife's soul, your children's souls, and their children's souls rot in hell for eternity."
The lawyer thought for a moment.
"What's the catch?" he asked.
I couldn't give two shits about sympathy.
And anybody that thinks I'm looking for sympathy for my chosen occupation can shove their sympathy up their asses. The nice thing about being a lawyer is that we're pretty well empowered to take up for ourselves. My point was that folks that push anti-lawyer stereotypes are jackasses. If the person making the attack has no better retort than to try and minimize the importance of their jackassery, that's a concession to my point.
About Rudy...
The problem is people know him from that, so every time you see him, you just assume that is what he is talking about. The thing he really constantly talks about is lowering crime in NYC. Probably too much, he brings that up when anyone asks about anything. And he has a very aggressive foreign policy, which of course stems from his role on 9/11 - but that is one of the most important issues of this race....
have you seen
I haven't
So he may be touting it all the time elsewhere, I just haven't seen it.
But to be fair, his being mayor of NYC is his experience, and it is unfair to expect him NOT to discuss what happened while mayor. He was a strong leader during/after the disaster - it isn't like he's Nagin running on a Katrina platform in New Orleans.
check it here
they've asked for an apology
slimiest...
Nice
Good foreshadowing
by inactive lsb user on Jan 8, 2008 7:54 PM CST up reply actions
Search him on YouTube
Some dude named Dodd
obama
I wonder now
I mean, is Obama going to say Hillary tampered the vote?
Hey why not, it's the next frontier. Democrats have already made a mockery of the general election.
Huckabee is going to win
He's got a Gerald Ford-ish quality about him
He is funny
He doesn't seem like the brightest guy sometimes though..
Fox
McCain fixin to give victory speech
by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 8:09 PM CST reply actions
Ralph Wiggum for President!
Uh-oh
Obama pulling closer....
I bet if he gets .01% ahead the networks will call it for him immediatly, because I'm imaging the various precincts/stat grinding/exit polling works out in his favor.
McCain's speech was so boring..plus he could barely say that last sentence..
just wait on fox news
right or wrong, they don't wanna be behind yet they don't have the balls to go out on a limb. that's good, and yet bad at the same time.
Now I think it's Hillary
Her lead is holding pretty steady..
i liked the song at the end
by knockoutking24 on Jan 8, 2008 8:31 PM CST reply actions
Per CNN:
Can only bode well for my man from Illinois, via Honolulu, Kansas, Kenya, Columbia U & Harvard U, Jakarta.
do the college towns
Yes...
If you want to know what he feels about the topic, look at constitution..
He's pretty much a hoss..
McCain's speech was...
Real
The only way...
Huckabee
fair? maybe perhaps technically
The
I own a business, explain to me how its fair I have to pay 15.3% more than the next person just because I am self-employed. I am being punished for offering a public service, for having a college degree, etc.??????
I am NOT rich BY ANY MEANS, but I hate peoples perception that just because you are rich you should pay buttloads in taxes. I think everyone should pay the same amount, except for poverty and just about poverty level. Just because someone makes 300k a year doesnt mean its fair for them to pay a higher % than someone making 70k. Your being puniched for succeeding in a career?
progressive taxation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_tax
Quote: "In the U.S., the vast majority of economists (81%) support progressive taxation."
Hmm...
You could argue
by Dustin on Jan 9, 2008 2:29 AM CST up reply actions
one would be wrong
Huh?
by inactive lsb user on Jan 9, 2008 2:41 PM CST up reply actions
right
once again, that's a tax cut for the wealthy.
very anti-middle class when you look at the sales tax idea...gosh.
why not throw in sales tax breaks for luxury vehicle purchases.
nope
and it's not being punished for being wealthy. at the end of the day, the wealthy do not become unwealthy because of taxes. and they got to pay for wars some how don't they? there are several deserving programs that have to be paid for. i'm sorry but we have an obligation to take care of our poor, our sick and our elderly. not to mention our children.
people like ron paul, john mccain, and mitt romney (at least this election year) worry so much about a child before they're born, but afterward they couldn't care less.
a 33% sales tax is not something i want and it's not something that would be a good thing. it's not gonna happen anytime soon anyway.
Not punished
by Dustin on Jan 9, 2008 2:31 AM CST up reply actions
Hello 36% sales tax.
Fair tax
Tonight is a win for Hillary
We're going to hear her say "I'm the new comeback kid" in a few hours... just wait...
you're correct
Lynn Samuels
Yesterday she said that if Obama wins, he'll be the first woman president in the U.S. Called him metrosexual. She said he's not black, he's a "beige yuppie." Said that the only reason that he's winning is that he's the first black man that white people aren't afraid of.
i'm gonna go ahead and call it
i don't care if they say the college towns haven't reported yet. fact is, obama would have to get like 75% of the votes of college students to win. besides, there's lots women who go to college too.
if clinton does not win new hampshire, i will pretend to be conservative for 2 weeks. and i won't be stereotypical either.
you must be breathing...
So much for all the polls...
The biggest thing I have seen tonight is how horrible McCain's "victory speech" was. Absolutely atrocious. The guy couldn't even thank his supporters "from the bottom of his heart" without looking down at his cue cards. That was a total choke job. Mitt's speech was again pretty good and Huck's wasn't bad either.
But the race is back on Obama v. Clinton...
i'd expect
then again, hillary could get very nice momentum and might be able to overcome this. the longer richardson and edwards stay in, the better for hillary.
Hillary wins...
supposedly
and bill clinton did a rush on the state yesterday too.
Bill's push probably helped
Do you think that this huge feminist movement
I believe that had a huge impact on what happened tonight.
Definitely, although I think
Nope. The pollsters just need to be smarter
Lets summarize Obama's speeches
Oh and uh btw, more money from the state for everybody!
No....him disappearing......
and huckabee
and oh yeah, huckabee is a tax fiend too.
If he was really a tax fiend
Barack
Ditto...
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 8, 2008 10:34 PM CST up reply actions
I look forward to more...
I concur
Me too. He's completely dominated
I would really love to see McCain v. Obama, because it would be a battle for the independents, which would result in less partisanship, IMO.
why is that?
by disposablehero on Jan 8, 2008 10:51 PM CST up reply actions
I think...
her record as a politician
Great points? WTF?
I don't like her...
As I said...
And what is your reasoning for why people won't vote for her? There clearly are a lot of those people out there.
Question for Obama people
i could possibly
I'd vote for John Edwards
i'll still vote for her...
Only voting for her because we have to curtail the Federalist society Supreme Court that is building. More Federalists on the bench will ruin our democracy. Rubber stamps for Bush and his ideologues...just like the Republican congress was for the first 6 years of his administration.
I would not...
I have mixed feelings about Edwards. If I were ranking candidates, it would probably go Obama, Richards, McCain, Guiliani/Romney...
....Hillary.
Wow, really?
You wouldn't jump across the aisle and vote for Barack though, would you?
I don't trust Hillary either, fwiw.
It would have been aisle-jumping...
The grassroots movement that started in the 90's for the Republicans is what got me interested into politics when I was in high school (class of 2001). I like the economic ideas of that conservatives put forward, was more into church and Christianity, and being a suburb kid made the choice easy for me.
But a combination of things has changed that. A big part of it is the Republicans controlling executive and legislative branches, and them being irresponsible with power. Also, I grew up and gained more life experience. Between college (admittedly, it was Baylor, but still) and a semester in Europe, plus graduating and living by myself in Dallas...just more life experiences.
I have this theory that the more people you meet, specifically, the wider spectrum of people you meet, the more centrist you become. Not saying that you would be completely down the middle if you could meet everyone in the world, but just that you would understand the arguments from the other side better.
I'm sure it doesn't apply all the time, but that's my theory...
Interesting points
I was raised a Republican (in Amarillo), but grew disillusioned to the entire conservative thought process once I went to college (a fairly conservative engineering university in Colorado) and had some real life experiences. Tutoring inner city Denver kids in math & computer science really opened my eyes to how ridiculously disadvantaged and shat upon by the system so many people in this country are. And they really have no voice in the process or direct way out of poverty.
Apologies for directly attacking your viewpoint a couple days ago, without any regard for measure or reason.
I still don't understand what you see in this president or how you think future generations will see his presidency any differently. That's pretty much right out of the Bill Kristol/Paul Wolfowitz PR manual, which doesn't seem like something you would parrot.
No worries...
My point isn't that Bush is a good, or even average for that matter, president. My point is just that not everything he has done has been bad. And if you can't see it, then it makes it hard for me to listen to your points rationally.
But I think highlights of his presidency would be his bringing education to the forefront (before 9/11) as opposed to just throwing more money at the problem (granted, it hasn't worked out fantastically well, but I appreciate trying something new), his response in rallying the country after 9/11, helping to streamline the way intelligence works in this country, and passing tax cuts to help a struggling economy. Also, his attempts at increasing gas mileage restrictions (with Obama) and at an immigration solution were good efforts in the right direction.
Despite all of this, I think most everyone will be happy to move on in 2009.
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 9, 2008 10:35 PM CST up reply actions
Hmmm
So we wholeheartedly disagree on the education issue.
After 9/11 he rallied the country, sure. Rallied us and the media right into the worst foreign policy decision in US history. The strikes in Afghanistan were smart and decisive, but he didn't finish the job. So another place we disagree.
If by "streamline the way intelligence works in this country", you mean "remove most of the liberties guaranteed Americans in the Constitution" then yes, we agree on that point.
On the contrary, the tax cuts have hurt this economy and the economy of your children and grandchildren (I'm not having any, but I care about yours anyway). But what's hurt this economy more have been his lax approach to the market and corporations. The market will NOT regulate itself. That has been proven time and time again. And when Greenspan (yes, I know he's gone, but his legacy lives on) and the other Fed operators bail out the corporations by feeding more cash into the system, it disincentivizes them to make good decisions and take measured risk.
Mileage restrictions, ok, but they should have been done in 2002, not 5 years later, when it was being forced through by a non-rubber stamp Dem congress.
Immigration is the only place I give Bush any credit. His plan made sense. So what if it's amnesty? It's the only logical way to deal with 2+ million illegals.
So I guess we're 1.5 out of 6.
Obama...
Hillary did well also as I thought her speech was strong. I could only imagine if these two could "take one for the team" and run on the same ticket. I don't believe there is a Republican out there that can beat either one of them, but together, wow.
Obama's speech
Yep...
Hopefully they can keep it civil
My favorite part...
You just can't even make up that sort of thing...
Concur...
If Hillary had lost there is no doubt in my mind she would have gone after him harder, hopefully now that she won NH she will play nice until at least super Tuesday.
That won't happen
Likewise, Obama has nothing to gain by making Hillary president. If she wins, then he has to wait 8 years to run again, at which point his whole "bring change to Washington" thing makes little sense, since he is the residing VP. But if a Hillary-Obama ticket happens to somehow lose, he becomes damaged goods like Edwards (because you KNOW the Clintons will somehow deflect blame onto him). He's better off stepping aside and running again in 4 years, regardless of whether Hillary is the incumbent or not.
Yes, combining the two would be a powerful ticket. But there is absolutely nothing in it for the VP in those scenarios.
Well I don't think...
agree
and on CNN a while ago, while their little roundtable was talking, one of the guys mentioned something like this....
"according to our sources, Barack Obama may be getting a very, very significant endorsement tomorrow in Nevada"
not sure if he's talking about Edwards or Richardson dropping out and endorsing Obama, or just some sort of big time endorsement that would help him solely in Nevada.
by disposablehero on Jan 8, 2008 11:13 PM CST up reply actions
I think the Nevada endorsement
A first
I think this is a good thing. This means the election on both sides will last at least until Super Tuesday next month. Heck, who know? Texas might even have a say in this thing on one or both sides when we vote in March. That would be sweet. I haven't even seen any polls in this state, but it is fun to speculate:
- I'd have to think that Hillary would be the favorite on the Dem side, but Obama would have a very good shot in the Lone Star State, particularly if African Americans rally behind him.
- If Edwards somehow is able to hold on until Texas, maybe by winning in Nevada or South Carolina, and some southern states on Super Tuesday, Texas might be a serious boost to his campaign. He's always been able to raise a lot of money here and has a lot of support in the legal community. And he talks like a Southerner which helps.
- I'd assume that Huckabee might be the favorite to win here, or possibly McCain. Rick Perry would look like a inept jackass if he can't move any votes for his boy Giuliani even in Texas.
Well said...
It would be nice to have all states vote on the same day with no media coverage to sway the voting. Then people would realy have to vote non-bias.
1. ?????
I wouldn't write off Iowa and NH as unrepresentative. They're very good states in the sense that they have about an even distribution of Dem, Republican, and Independent voters.
They are light on minority representation; the Latin vote is very important in Texas and California. Nevertheless, I think they're excellent training grounds for the candidates. It gives the candidates a well-informed and earnest group with quick feedback on personality and policy issues due to the rapid campaigning over such small geographic areas. The result is that candidates can sharpen their message and presentation before it has to be played on a national and less personal scale.
Think Clinton will abandon all of this heartfelt politics rhetoric after NH? Nope. She found out that it will need to be one of her campaign's most immediately identifiable qualities, thanks to the response in IA and NH.
Sorry to gripe. I really like the way the caucuses and primaries are set up.
I hear you
I hate ethanol
I agree that Iowa being first is a big reason that people keep hyping up EtOH as a fuel. Enough senators have delusions of running for President someday that they ignore the fact that it costs more energy to produce than it provides and it ruining our once healthy food generation industry.
What I don't get is...
It's like they figured out how to get ethanol from corn and all the corn farmers got big dollar signs in their eyes. That's not how it works. Growing and selling corn works because of the amount of money each ear of corn makes as food. First big problem is, there's probably not enough land that you could grow corn on to seriously dent how much ethanol we would need. Second, you need so much corn that it doesn't make a whole lot of economic sense.
What could work maybe, and I don't really know the numbers here, is if you switched to cellulose. All of a sudden, you're using farm waste and crappy land that isn't used for farming (grasses and such, not as big a nutrient need). That's a LOT cheaper, I just don't know how much.
It's amazing that our government could get this close to figuring out bio-fuel and then be so amazingly far in the end.
This sticked thread
It creats too much politics talk.
In my opinion, you should have simply banned politics in non-politics threads.
Then people could make politics threads naturally, and occasionally. Rather than this semi-permanent junk.
Would be better.
Hillary still uphill battle
Durned if I know who will win.
Lotsa black folks in South Carolina
"Black Folks" love them some Clintons..
Bill still see's...
I live in SC
And the person driving was white.
Apparently black people here don't accept Obama as being black because he's not a descendant of black Americans or something.
I really think Clinton takes this state. She'll split the black vote with Obama, and Edwards will siphon off enough independent votes from Obama to give Hillary the win.
by thedirkatron on Jan 10, 2008 12:21 AM CST up reply actions
sadly, I think you're right
on the contrary...
what about lawn signs / graffiti tags?
Actual delegate count
Huckabee is your rep leader!!!
Although, this delegate crap makes no sense, Thousands of rules and caveats. It seems like many delegates can vote for whoever they want anyway. Such as the superdelegates on the Democrat side MSNBC isn't counting.
Hillary and Obama get the same delegates for NH also, for whatever reason.
Wiki has a different delegate count
So umm, whatever.
I wonder
Chris Matthews
He said he thinks white people were lying to pollsters to appear more progressive.
Because Hillary had such a consistent win, with the same margin all night, that you could pull any section of the state and the results would be the same. So basically it couldn't be innacurate polling.
And the difference with Iowa was, in Iowa they had to go in a room with other people out in the open to vote. So basically they couldn't vote their true (supposedly racist) feelings in Iowa.
It's the...
Of course, it would be crazy just to think that people change their minds, are sitting on the fence, or just weren't polled efficiently enough. It must definetly be race.
Are there some people who wouldn't vote for Obama because he's black? Probably. I just don't think that those people would vote for him if he were white, because of the policies is putting forward and what he represents. I also think (hope!) that there aren't as many of those people as the media thinks there are.
Do you believe him?
Damn....
Do you remember ross Perot?
Because of people like you
by inactive lsb user on Jan 9, 2008 5:07 PM CST up reply actions
please no bloomberg
pat > all the republican candidates. i think sharky would agree with me here.
no on hagel
gingrich had his shot. he broke his promise with america.
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture
broke his promise?
Huckabee
Here's my prediction, he's expected to win SC, but I'm going to say he takes Michigan this week, or either runs a VERY strong second, something like that. Michigan is going to be Huckabees shot heard round the world, the point were the media is going to be forced to open their eyes to this guy. I mean you can just see it unfolding. Not one network is even mentioning Huck in Mich, it's all McCain versus Romney. But the latest Michigan poll I see up on RCP is Huck+1. And that's the most recent poll.
Huck takes Mich and SC, he's going to take Florida then. You look at the Florida polls he's already right near the top, now add the momentum of a Mich+SC win and it would be over in Florida. and I think he's then relatively unstoppable with all that momentum into super Tuesday. That is how I see things shaking out. It's unbelievable how the media is turning a blind eye to Huck.
Furthermore
Then he'd still pull off the SC+Florida combo pretty easily.
Michigan isn't even needed for Huck to win, but as I say, I predict it will be his shot heard round the world anyway..
http://race42008.com/2008/01/09/poll-watch-rossman-group-michigan-gop-primary/
Bill Richardson is out
Probably helps Hillary the most, as she is better positioned to pick up most of whatever Hispanic support he would have had.
And now, from my count, there are no candidates left who have been a cabinet secretary...
Well
True,
Thinking about it, I guess Secretaries don't often run for president. They usually are given a position after losing the nomination, or they resign in disgrace by taking the fall for their President's mistakes
Richardson drops out
Er
Well...
What do you dislike about Richardson?
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 8:29 AM CST up reply actions
probably...
The left equivalent of Giuliani
Examples?
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 1:00 PM CST up reply actions
On Meet The Press...
Giuliani said the same thing when he was in Massachusetts, trying to drum up support. Later claimed he was a fan of "the AL".
That's the only comparison I was making.
this is the first i heard
rudy is a new yorker. he's supposed to HATE the sox.
i wouldn't expect ted kennedy to be a yankee fan.
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture
B/C that sounds like Hillary, if we're talkin dems
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 1:01 PM CST up reply actions
Diebold cheated for Hillary!
Doh! Looney lefties thwarted by Diebold again! Now Diebold is cheating for the slightly less extremist extreme lefty, even!
hillary isn't liberal
as far as the diebold stats...if those are true, there are other variables not discussed. such as, did hillary win all the diebold districts? did obama win all the hand count districts?
then there is the fact that the different districts have different demographics.
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture
Stop feeding the troll gossamer...
this is not true
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture
Yo, Gossamer
And both Obama and Clinton are extremists.
Really
my mistake
i like you sharky.
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture
Well...
As for Edwards...ouch. Not even the man who picked you as his VP candidate in 2004 will endorse you. I would think this is the nail in the coffin for him.
Kerry probably has convinced himself
Also, Kerry isn't going to pick a sure-loser. You want to be thought of as the King(or Queen)-maker in making an endorsement...
gore endorsed dean
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture
I think it could hurt...
Bingo!
I just pray that we don't have to listen to another rambling speech from him if Obama does win the primaries..
by GhettoBear04 on Jan 10, 2008 10:49 PM CST up reply actions
Disagree...
I don't think Kerry is a dolt either...
Much like Romney
Paul is a Racist
http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/10/paul.newsletters/index.html
Conspiracy of the liberal media? Discuss.
The New Republic has the better scoop
Not a conspiracy
This is not a new discovery. This has been brought up in many of Paul's congressional campaigns by his opponents and his position and rebuttal has always been the same. You can read his most recent press release here http://www.ronpaul2008.com/press-releases/125/ron-paul-statement-on-the-new-republic-article-regardi ng-old-newsletters
His congressional voting record does not match with any of the terrible things written in the newsletters nor do his longstanding views on the issue of racism noted here http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/racism/
Huckabee taking blows today
I stick by him though!
Just temporary NH bounce..plus I think Huck is a guy who will get really underrepresented in polls. I mean he won Iowa by nine and I dont think any poll had him close to that margin..
McCain or Huckabee
McCain is the frontrunner. If he wins Michigan, he could just snowball SC. Somebody said the first Republican to string together two wins in a row might just snowball. That could be McCain if he can take Michigan.
Huckabee could do the same. One recent poll has him up one in Mich. One has him down 11 in third place.
Romney could win Nevada, but he pretty much has to win Mich. Because he's third in SC currently. But really, he's not that much worse off than McCain. It's just McCain has NH momentum, really. I mean Romney polls just a few points down in SC, too.
And Rudy had to pin all his hopes on Florida. He has to hope the other states just keep going to different people, rather than one guy like McCain building any momentum. His is the hardest path..because I dont think he's that strong in Florida anyway. His lead is tenuous.
what about
1 has romney in 2nd back 4 points, the other has him in 1st up 8 points.
i really don't want him to win anything. boo romney!
go huck and mccain (mccain moreso)
i like you sharky.
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture
New Michigan polls
hey gossamer...
Strategic Vision: http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/michigan_poll_011008.htm
McCain 29
Romney 20
Rossman Group: http://www.rossmanmartin.com/press_releases/article_read.cfm
Huckabee 23
Romney 22
McCain 18
Rossman
You have to go here: http://www.rossmanmartin.com/press_releases/view_all.cfm
And then click on "Presidential Primary Survey: GOP in Three-way Race, Clinton leads Democrat Field"
Those polls
that's it
1 poll has romney down 9 in 2nd the other has him in 2nd down 1 but ahead of mccain.
i was wrong and i'm sorry.
but the point is the same. polls will give you a rough idea but can be off by a bit (as evidenced in NH)
2 polls from the same day top 3:
poll a has
1 mccain 29%
2 romney 20%
3 huck 18%
poll b has
1 huck 23%
2 romney 22%
3 mccain 18%
those are quite off. mccain is 11 points off, romney only 2 and huck at 5.
i don't know which poll is better so i'd put equal weight in them both and end up with this:
mccain - 24%
romney - 21%
huck - 20.5%
of course those WON'T be the numbers in tomorrow's poll or on the primary. but if they are, that's absolutely it for romney, 100%. especially since he'd put his resources all in there. but my guess is that he'll do better than that 21% and probably win it. if not, he'll still lead in the delegate counts, put he'll do progressively worse in each state.
as of right now in south carolina it's
huck 33%
mccain 21%
romney 14%
of course romney has given up in SC. when thompson loses there, he's gotta drop out. and i'd expect he endorses mccain. huck will probably win there, though mccain thinks he can gain points.
now sharky, if huck wins SC like it seems, and he pulls ahead in michigan in that 3 horse race (i doubt it, romney will prob pull it out) then he's the republican nominee.
rudy is praying that romney wins michigan.
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
NIXON: NOW MORE THAN EVER
Nope
Rasmussen has McCain 27 Huckabee 24.
Fox News McCain 25 Huck 18
As for the two Mich polls..
The Rossman group one was 300 voters and a higher margin of error. The Strategic Visions one was 700 voters.
On the surface you'd have to give the SV one more credit. But in looking for reasons to prefer the one that has Huck ahead, it was later. Rossman was taken on 16-1/7 while SV was 1/4-1/6. And also SV's Iowa poll was way off, it had Romney winning by two points..
Huckabee support
Like you stuck by Thompson?
by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 8:39 PM CST up reply actions
Next thing you know...
Good to hear I reneged on the bet
After all, apparently I already reneged so..
Err
Oh that's right, I never did.
Only a whole diary on it
by Brian Thomas on Jan 11, 2008 6:38 AM CST up reply actions
I'm screenshotting it here...
And the coup de grâce:
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahaha...
O'Reilly
ACLU sued, claimed it discriminated against the poor.
What a joke..
Looks like ACLU is going to lose, though.
ACLU trying to protect liberal voter fraud..
Has anyone noticed
I can't believe...
Paul just OWNED the rest of the candidates by pointing out their 'conservative' records in response to a question about his electability as a conservative.
Then he pointed out the massive elephant in the room: how the US is borrowing money from China to prop up Musharraf and the failed policy in Iraq where our brave men and women are dying. Awesome!
No racist or homophobic comments from him yet, so I'm gonna keep watching...
McCain is so freaking boring. Bob Dole 08.
Fox asked hard questions
It is painful...
It is painful to watch CNN
yep
just have the chyron and graphics people take care of it!
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
NIXON: NOW MORE THAN EVER
War
Especially the Democrats.
There's virtually no way we're leaving Iraq anytime soon..
It's like trying to end social security or farm subsidizes. It doesn't matter if 99.9% of people supported, you couldn't do a damn thing about it. This is not a democracy, it's rule by those who get the checks.
Exactly
Aww
You just dont wanna face facts Cahill. Both sides want it. Play ignorant if you want, I know it's your area of expertise.
Maybe
I don't think the Dems
I know both sides line up to give money away
Its the same thing, just different check cashers. There is a reason that Republicans get fat checks from corporations. Its so the gravy train keeps flowing.
This poll
This poll shows McCain beating both Clinton and Obama handily in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania and Ohio of course are pretty much the two crucial swing states in recent elections, in fact Pennsylvania went to the Democrats last time and Bush only needed Ohio to win.
I fail to see then why all you hear on TV is what a uphill struggle the Repuiblican candidate will have...
Especially if Obama keeps talking about ending the Iraq war he will lose..all these people getting cut checks in Iraq will personally see to it. All the rest of us dont have any dog in the fight so we dont care. That is why government programs dont die. If you cant kill social security what makes you think you can kill a war..
So...
You and Andrew Sullivan are the only ones I know and I just don't get it.
+1
Poor guy.
by inactive lsb user on Jan 11, 2008 11:57 PM CST up reply actions

by 































