Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Terry Collins, David Wright, And The Mets/Brewers Kerfuffle

Open Thread 4 - Politics

Same rules:

http://www.lonestarball.com/story/2008/1/1/213424/7440

Comment 272 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Hillary somehow closed the gap it appears...
...based on early returns.  This should reshape the media's dialog.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 7:33 PM CST reply actions  

ter
"The Democrats want change, they want the change in your pockets"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 14, 2008 10:27 AM CST up reply actions  

I'll repost my comments from the other
Wow, Clinton>Obama?

Even if Obama wins, I think this highlights that he's a very weak candidate. I salivate over this guy about as much as Hillary Clinton. I think either is very, very weak.

My boy Huckabee held serve, third place>Paul and Giuliani. Not a strong third, but good enough.

If Hillary wins

I expect to see her break down in tears at such catastrophes as her shoelace coming untied, in the near future...

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 7:36 PM CST reply actions  

i'm rooting for huckabee
to win the nomination too.

i guess since edwards is out of it, i'll root for obama.

obama vs huck!  i wanna see that.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 7:37 PM CST up reply actions  

Obama would destroy Huck...
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 9:16 PM CST up reply actions  

her tearing up
seems to have worked.

i believe it was genuine.  shame on those who thought otherwise.  it showed that she is a human being.  

barack could still end up winning, though i doubt it.  clinton was supposedly down by double digits.  

comeback kid part 2

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 7:36 PM CST reply actions  

thoughts
figured as a result of polling that mccain would win

suprises:
-huckabee over guilani/paul
-paul is, as of now, 300 behind guilani
-clinton winning so far - i really though obama would pull it out...

by knockoutking24 on Jan 8, 2008 7:38 PM CST reply actions  

At this point in Iowa (with <20% in)...
...Clinton was winning too.

These numbers are mostly from rural areas where Obama doesn't poll as well (most of the populist/progressive support goes to Edwards).  

Watch Obama pull out a 3-4% win

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 7:41 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm actually pretty surprised
that McCain is going to win this

by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 7:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Uhh
If you're basing anything on polls, the polls had Obama a lot bigger winner than McCain.

One thing I've noticed tonight on TV, and from Ranger moto here, is "progressive" is the new attenpt by liberals to make a word with a more positive connotation to describe themselves.

Sort of like how it's now no longer "global warming" that is the preffered phrase from the left, because every cold snap makes that phrase look bad, but rather the more ambigous and unprovable "climate change".

Also I've noted with pride that "swift boating" seems to be a new term/idea in politics, because it was so succesful. AKA Hillary Clinton allies were rumored to be about to launch a "swift boat" style attack on Obama..

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 7:46 PM CST up reply actions  

Looks like John McCain
is going to win the New Hampshire GOP primary.

by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 7:39 PM CST reply actions  

and the award
for biggest ripped off name goes to:
ghostofchrisyoungandjohndanks

www.gaslampball.com
www.southsidesox.com

go there and never come back.

by knockoutking24 on Jan 8, 2008 7:40 PM CST up reply actions  

IF this holds up..
The polls really got racked here, which is really nice to see.

Even the exit polls had Obama by five. Of course the same exit polls that Democrats claimed proved George Bush cheated in Ohio.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 7:40 PM CST reply actions  

Ron Paul
is pretty much a badass...
"Bush is one of the best post-civil war presidents, easily." - Dstar

by miles on Jan 8, 2008 7:49 PM CST reply actions  

Indeed he is.
An overtly racist badass.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 1:12 PM CST up reply actions  

+2
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 1:37 PM CST up reply actions  

I have heard a lot of this shit on LSB...
but didn't believe it. Then I saw a story on the news the other day (ABC or NBC?). It appears Mr. Paul does have quite the history of discrimination or at least racial coments...sad.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 9, 2008 6:45 PM CST up reply actions  

and anti-gay comments
not to mention supporting the likes of Timothy McVeigh
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 7:16 PM CST up reply actions  

pathetic...
although I see every one of the republican candidates as homophobes. One of many reasons to never vote republican.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 9, 2008 7:51 PM CST up reply actions  

Wow
Outside of Huckabee, there isn't a Republican that I can stomach.

Romney looks like that smug neighbor of yours who thinks he runs the block because he leased a Lexus last week.

McCain is just a crazy old man. He physically frightens me.

Guiliani has one catchphrase: "I WAS MAYOR ON 9/11!" Outside of that, he seems very...blah.

Let's go B-Rock.

Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 7:51 PM CST reply actions  

+1
"You really do like 15 year old hispanic boys, Z." -thedirkatron

by coolaid on Jan 8, 2008 7:52 PM CST up reply actions  

-1
B-Rock is a giant tool.

Boy, the liberal media myth of the beloved unstoppable Obama sure got punctured like a hot air balloon tonight. I love it.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 7:53 PM CST up reply actions  

How is he a tool?
Everyone is entitled to her own opinion, but I'm just curious to see what you don't like about him.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 8:00 PM CST up reply actions  

LEAVE JOHN McCAIN ALONE
He's not a crazy old man.

The MAC is back!

http://www.johnmccain.com/About/

by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 7:59 PM CST up reply actions  

McCain
is far from crazy.  He is, however, about 10 years too old in my opinion.

by bflood36 on Jan 8, 2008 8:17 PM CST up reply actions  

McCain = Dole
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 8:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Concur
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 9:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Ronald Reagan
was also about 10 years too old in your opinion

by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 8:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep..
..towards the end of his 2nd term, I do believe he was about 10 years too old.

by bflood36 on Jan 8, 2008 9:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Haha
"like that smug neighbor of yours who thinks he runs the block because he leased a Lexus last week."

That is pure greatness, LOLOLOL

"Bush is one of the best post-civil war presidents, easily." - Dstar

by miles on Jan 8, 2008 8:25 PM CST up reply actions  

i agree
though i'd say romney is "smarmy"
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 8:27 PM CST up reply actions  

i think you're using the wrong word
do you mean "smug"?
Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Jan 9, 2008 12:59 AM CST up reply actions  

no
smarmy is the word.

1 : revealing or marked by a smug, ingratiating, or false earnestness >

2 : of low sleazy taste or quality

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 10:06 AM CST up reply actions  

I know what you mean
Smarmy is the word that I have been using for a while to describe how I feel about Edwards.  Both he and Romney seem to be where they are because they carefully chose a message that was perfect for their target constituency and their past.  They are both pretty-boys who fit the classic politician description, and in another life would be the quintessential obnoxious MBA who acts like a friend until stabbing you in the back is more useful to him or a trial lawyer willing to sue anyone for anything just to make a buck. Oh wait a second...

If I have to hear about Edwards father and that mill again, I may break something...

by JBImaknee on Jan 9, 2008 11:14 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't understand.
"Trial lawyer willing to sue anyone for anything."

What do you mean by this?  Are you saying Edwards pursued frivolous claims as a plaintiff's lawyer?  From what I understand, he's a multi-millionaire because he sued defendants for righteous reasons and made a ton of money doing it.  Attorneys that typically sue "anyone for anything" don't remain attorneys for very long because they are either broke or disbarred.

by Athos on Jan 9, 2008 4:18 PM CST up reply actions  

you're right
edwards was very honorable and looked out for the little guy when the big guy went to far.
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 4:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Typical wing-nut comment....
about trial lawyers....poor, pitiful corporations, damn trial lawyers threaten them with going to court....so they have to settle.

When was the last time a corporation settled out of court & thought they were paying more?

by tklawless on Jan 9, 2008 11:36 PM CST up reply actions  

You know...
you're comments about me are about as constructive as Sharky's are about most people.  

You call me a wing-nut because I make a sarcastic stereotype joke about Edwards' career?  In the same line that I make a sarcastic, stereotype joke about Romney's career?  You realize that people in the country make fun of lawyers, right?  

Just like the other day when I comment the Republican debate was more entertaining to watch than the democrats because they bickered about the issues?  An opinion about entertainment value makes me a right wing hack?  Come on, don't be the left-wing balance to Sharky...

by JBImaknee on Jan 10, 2008 10:47 AM CST up reply actions  

Lawyer jokes.
Personally, I don't have any problem with them.  Most of them are quite funny.  I like to tell a few of them myself.

I've never heard the one where the punch line was that a typical trial lawyer would "sue anyone for anything."  That's not really a joke.  Instead, it is purveying a stereotype which is on par with saying "all black people are on welfare" or "all Jews are money-grubbers."  It is a statement founded upon pure ignorance and implies poor character on the part of the target "class."

Hopefully you didn't mean it in that way and just made a VERY poor attempt at being humorous.  I'll certainly assume that's the case unless you tell me otherwise.

by Athos on Jan 10, 2008 4:19 PM CST up reply actions  

I think you're going to have trouble
finding sympathy with people by claiming that making fun of lawyers is even REMOTELY equivalent to saying that "all black people are on welfare" or "all Jews are money-grubbers."  That is insane.  

Instead, it is the equivalent to saying "all bankers are greedy" or "all oil guys could care less about the environment."  Yes, its a negative stereotype, and obviously a silly one (which was my point, along with the shallow cutthroat businessman reference with Romney), but if you are getting offended to the point of saying it is the equivalent of those racial slurs, then you need to get some perspective.

by JBImaknee on Jan 10, 2008 5:01 PM CST up reply actions  

The devil visited a lawyer's office
and made him an offer.

"I can arrange some things for you, " the devil said. "I'll increase your income five-fold. Your partners will love you; your clients will respect you; you'll have four months of vacation each year and live to be a hundred.

"All I require in return is that your wife's soul, your children's souls, and their children's souls rot in hell for eternity."

The lawyer thought for a moment.

"What's the catch?" he asked.  

by Spoorts!! on Jan 10, 2008 5:54 PM CST up reply actions  

I couldn't give two shits about sympathy.
I'm a lawyer after all.  The analogy is proper.  It's probably not as egregious as one of the others since it is much more p.c. to be offended at racial stereotypes than occupational stereotypes, but the intent of the jackass making the comment is EXACTLY the same.  My "perspective" is right on the money.

And anybody that thinks I'm looking for sympathy for my chosen occupation can shove their sympathy up their asses.  The nice thing about being a lawyer is that we're pretty well empowered to take up for ourselves.  My point was that folks that push anti-lawyer stereotypes are jackasses.  If the person making the attack has no better retort than to try and minimize the importance of their jackassery, that's a concession to my point.

by Athos on Jan 10, 2008 9:56 PM CST up reply actions  

About Rudy...
I'm not a Rudy supporter, but I don't get why everyone keeps bringing up the 9/11 thing.  He doesn't talk about it all the time - in fact, I think he talks about it far less than he probably should.  It is really not a big theme in his campaign.

The problem is people know him from that, so every time you see him, you just assume that is what he is talking about.  The thing he really constantly talks about is lowering crime in NYC.  Probably too much, he brings that up when anyone asks about anything.  And he has a very aggressive foreign policy, which of course stems from his role on 9/11 - but that is one of the most important issues of this race....

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 8:52 PM CST up reply actions  

have you seen
that disgusting "tested" ad?
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 8:53 PM CST up reply actions  

I haven't
all I really know is from the debates and one ad I saw him in out here in Cali.

So he may be touting it all the time elsewhere, I just haven't seen it.

But to be fair, his being mayor of NYC is his experience, and it is unfair to expect him NOT to discuss what happened while mayor.  He was a strong leader during/after the disaster - it isn't like he's Nagin running on a Katrina platform in New Orleans.  

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 9:07 PM CST up reply actions  

check it here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y2iFhGtKO-Q
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 9:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Ha
I imagine that CAIR isn't too pleased with that ad.  That's pretty antagonistic...

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 9:22 PM CST up reply actions  

they've asked for an apology
rudy is a jerk.  he hates free speech when he doesn't agree with it.  and if it weren't for romney, he'd be the slimiest contestant in the GOP.
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 9:24 PM CST up reply actions  

slimiest...
Rudy > every other candidate, even Romney. Not even close imo.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 9:28 PM CST up reply actions  

Nice
a rather civil thread so far. very nice.
"Lois, undecided voters are the biggest idiots on the planet, try giving short, simple answers."

by Longhorn on Jan 8, 2008 7:52 PM CST reply actions  

Good foreshadowing
LSB : Trolls :: Rangers : 4th OF'ers

by inactive lsb user on Jan 8, 2008 7:54 PM CST up reply actions  

Search him on YouTube
He is a crazy person. And the saddest part is, I''m not even close to joking.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 7:59 PM CST up reply actions  

Some dude named Dodd
Has 55 votes Gravel has a commanding lead!
Must read. "Only the Ball was White" Boomer Sooner!

by boomer1 on Jan 8, 2008 8:01 PM CST up reply actions  

obama
is closing in!
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 7:59 PM CST reply actions  

I wonder now
If Democrats will accuse each other of cheating, the way they do Republicans everytime tha marge in less than 5%?

I mean, is Obama going to say Hillary tampered the vote?

Hey why not, it's the next frontier. Democrats have already made a mockery of the general election.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 7:59 PM CST reply actions  

You know...
...I really do like Huckabee.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 8:01 PM CST reply actions  

why, pray tell?
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 8:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Huckabee is going to win
Just watching his press conferences, it's so obvious this guy is a winner.
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 8:01 PM CST reply actions  

He's got a Gerald Ford-ish quality about him
Unassuming, non-confrontational (except against Romney), polite, smiling, funny...if a Republican has to win, I want it to be him.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 8:03 PM CST up reply actions  

He is funny
He gets off some real zingers.

He doesn't seem like the brightest guy sometimes though..

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 8:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Gerald Ford
the one President never to actually be elected in any national election...

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 8:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Fox
"Decision desk", their stat heads who grind the various numbers and make projections, just said there is indeed a real chance Hillary could win this.
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 8:03 PM CST reply actions  

hopefully
the republicans don't declare the democrat nominee a terror threat and whisk him off to guantonimo
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 8:07 PM CST up reply actions  

Ralph Wiggum for President!
Can you please Look into getting a less funny signature? That's sarcasm, btw. - Sharky

by rentz on Jan 8, 2008 8:19 PM CST reply actions  

Uh-oh

Obama pulling closer....

I bet if he gets .01% ahead the networks will call it for him immediatly, because I'm imaging the various precincts/stat grinding/exit polling works out in his favor.

McCain's speech was so boring..plus he could barely say that last sentence..

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 8:29 PM CST reply actions  

just wait on fox news
cnn and msnbc tend to wait on them.

right or wrong, they don't wanna be behind yet they don't have the balls to go out on a limb.  that's good, and yet bad at the same time.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 8:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Now I think it's Hillary
The "latest" exit polling has her ahead.

Her lead is holding pretty steady..

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Per CNN:
No college towns have reported yet.

Can only bode well for my man from Illinois, via Honolulu, Kansas, Kenya, Columbia U & Harvard U, Jakarta.

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 8:35 PM CST reply actions  

do the college towns
help out psycho ron paul?
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes...
Because they know Ron Paul gets all his views from the constitution.

If you want to know what he feels about the topic, look at constitution..

He's pretty much a hoss..

"Bush is one of the best post-civil war presidents, easily." - Dstar

by miles on Jan 8, 2008 8:45 PM CST up reply actions  

McCain's speech was...
...nearly Dean Scream-esque.  Just awful.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 8:36 PM CST reply actions  

Real
change we can believe in?  I pay enough taxes as it is, I do not need them going higher.  Not the change I am looking for.
The Texas Rangers rounded the bases at a dizzying pace

by fsujon on Jan 8, 2008 8:38 PM CST up reply actions  

The only way...
...your taxes would be higher in an Obama or Edwards administration would be if you're in the top 1%
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 8:41 PM CST up reply actions  

Huckabee
= Fair Tax!!!!!  
The Texas Rangers rounded the bases at a dizzying pace

by fsujon on Jan 8, 2008 8:43 PM CST up reply actions  

=beastly
"Bush is one of the best post-civil war presidents, easily." - Dstar

by miles on Jan 8, 2008 8:44 PM CST up reply actions  

fair? maybe perhaps technically
but it ends up being a BIG tax cut for the rich...and a huge tax hike for the poor and middle class.
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 8:46 PM CST up reply actions  

The
actual poor would have no tax in the Fair Tax plan.

I own a business, explain to me how its fair I have to pay 15.3% more than the next person just because I am self-employed. I am being punished for offering a public service, for having a college degree, etc.??????

I am  NOT rich BY ANY MEANS, but I hate peoples perception that just because you are rich you should pay buttloads in taxes.  I think everyone should pay the same amount, except for poverty and just about poverty level. Just because someone makes 300k a year doesnt mean its fair for them to pay a higher % than someone making 70k.  Your being puniched for succeeding in a career?

The Texas Rangers rounded the bases at a dizzying pace

by fsujon on Jan 8, 2008 8:57 PM CST up reply actions  

progressive taxation
Rich people have more disposable income, so taxes hurt them proportionately less.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_tax

Quote: "In the U.S., the vast majority of economists (81%) support progressive taxation."

by LukeR on Jan 8, 2008 9:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmm...
one could also argue that rich people benefit least from government spending, so they should pay proportionately less...

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

You could argue
...that they benefit the most, too.  
Ctrl - V

by Dustin on Jan 9, 2008 2:29 AM CST up reply actions  

one would be wrong
Governments are in place to protect the rich otherwise they'd get robbed and killed all the time.

by bushe on Jan 9, 2008 8:20 AM CST up reply actions  

Huh?
LSB : Trolls :: Rangers : 4th OF'ers

by inactive lsb user on Jan 9, 2008 2:41 PM CST up reply actions  

right
and he wants to get rid of the capital gains and dividends tax.

once again, that's a tax cut for the wealthy.

very anti-middle class when you look at the sales tax idea...gosh.

why not throw in sales tax breaks for luxury vehicle purchases.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 9:10 PM CST up reply actions  

nope
the poor would have to pay the sales tax and would be eligible to apply for a refund later on.  i don't like it, and i bet most people wouldn't either.

and it's not being punished for being wealthy.   at the end of the day, the wealthy do not become unwealthy because of taxes.  and they got to pay for wars some how don't they?  there are several deserving programs that have to be paid for.  i'm sorry but we have an obligation to take care of our poor, our sick and our elderly.  not to mention our children.  

people like ron paul, john mccain, and mitt romney (at least this election year) worry so much about a child before they're born, but afterward they couldn't care less.

a 33% sales tax is not something i want and it's not something that would be a good thing.  it's not gonna happen anytime soon anyway.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 9:06 PM CST up reply actions  

Not punished
The reason the middle class should be taxed less is that's where the wealth is in this country.  That's who spends and creates the demand that drives the economy.  When the middle class spends, don't forget that the rich make money off that.
Ctrl - V

by Dustin on Jan 9, 2008 2:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Hello 36% sales tax.
And underground markets.
If I owned a lightsaber, the blade color would be black light, so that I could use it to fight evil and to liven-up parties.

by rooster on Jan 8, 2008 8:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Fair tax
is one of those great gimmicks to campaign on that has no chance of actually being implemented.  Do you really think that a Democrat senate and house will vote through the Constitutional amendment necessary to overhaul the tax code that much?

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 9:19 PM CST up reply actions  

+1
That's tremendous.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 8:46 PM CST up reply actions  

ha ha
wrong

by ghostofChrisYoungandJohnDanks on Jan 8, 2008 8:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Per CNN.com
Hillsborough County, the state's largest, has not reported yet.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 8:45 PM CST reply actions  

UNH is there, no?
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 8:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Nah
UNH is in Strafford County, which has also not reported.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 8:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Tonight is a win for Hillary
Even if Obama pulls ahead by a point or two, people were betting on what day Clinton drops out.  She was supposed to lose by double digits in an Obama landslide according to some people.  

We're going to hear her say "I'm the new comeback kid" in a few hours... just wait...

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 8:56 PM CST reply actions  

you're correct
And of course you know the media loves a comeback story.  Just like they did with Obama last week.  You'll see Hillary's fundraising $$ pick up too now that she's not left for dead.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 9:03 PM CST up reply actions  

Lynn Samuels
For those who have not heard her, she is a liberal talkshow host that sounds a lot like the old SNL "Coffee Talk" ladies.  Thick NY accent.  She's syndicated on Sirius Left.  Big Hillary backer.

Yesterday she said that if Obama wins, he'll be the first woman president in the U.S.  Called him metrosexual.  She said he's not black, he's a "beige yuppie."  Said that the only reason that he's winning is that he's the first black man that white people aren't afraid of.

by Spoorts!! on Jan 8, 2008 9:01 PM CST reply actions  

i'm gonna go ahead and call it
clinton wins new hampshire.

i don't care if they say the college towns haven't reported yet.  fact is, obama would have to get like 75% of the votes of college students to win.  besides, there's lots women who go to college too.

if clinton does not win new hampshire, i will pretend to be conservative for 2 weeks.  and i won't be stereotypical either.  

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 9:17 PM CST reply actions  

you must be breathing...
a big sigh of relief right about now.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 11:28 PM CST up reply actions  

So much for all the polls...
I warned Brett not to underestimate Clinton and it looks like she will come through. As JBI said even if Obama comes back this is still a win for her.

The biggest thing I have seen tonight is how horrible McCain's "victory speech" was. Absolutely atrocious. The guy couldn't even thank his supporters "from the bottom of his heart" without looking down at his cue cards. That was a total choke job. Mitt's speech was again pretty good and Huck's wasn't bad either.

But the race is back on Obama v. Clinton...

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 9:26 PM CST reply actions  

i'd expect
that once richardson drops out, most his supporters will go to obama.  same thing with edwards.  at least as his support keeps dwindling.

then again, hillary could get very nice momentum and might be able to overcome this.  the longer richardson and edwards stay in, the better for hillary.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 9:33 PM CST up reply actions  

Hillary wins...
wow, so many pollsters should be fired right about now.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 9:35 PM CST reply actions  

supposedly
17% made up their minds today.  her tearing up may have helped.

and bill clinton did a rush on the state yesterday too.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 9:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Bill's push probably helped
sway some undecided voters. What I fear is a BIG feminist rush toward Clinton. Obama should still win this, but this does not bode well.  
Fire Todd Dodge.

by sprite on Jan 8, 2008 9:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Do you think that this huge feminist movement
Was brought on by the sexist comments of those protestors at Hillary's campaign rally saying "Iron my shirt"?

I believe that had a huge impact on what happened tonight.

by hiafex on Jan 8, 2008 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Definitely, although I think
her tearing up had a greater effect than that. People probably saw her as a real person that has real emotions, instead of a politician. Now, that was an immediate result to what happened yesterday. Can she keep it up? I don't think so. But the feminist vote can take her very far.
Fire Todd Dodge.

by sprite on Jan 8, 2008 10:25 PM CST up reply actions  

yeah, no kidding
just when i start having a glimmer of hope for this country too....

by SteveP on Jan 8, 2008 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope. The pollsters just need to be smarter
and realize that they need to factor undecided voters into the discussion of uncertainty in the poll.
If I owned a lightsaber, the blade color would be black light, so that I could use it to fight evil and to liven-up parties.

by rooster on Jan 8, 2008 9:47 PM CST up reply actions  

-1
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 3:14 AM CST up reply actions  

Lets summarize Obama's speeches
Uhh, change! and yeah uh..change! and oh yeah uh..change!

Oh and uh btw, more money from the state for everybody!

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 9:55 PM CST reply actions  

yay!
change, woo woo woo!!
"Lois, undecided voters are the biggest idiots on the planet, try giving short, simple answers."

by Longhorn on Jan 8, 2008 9:57 PM CST up reply actions  

+1
Short, sweet, to the point. Nice.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 8, 2008 10:10 PM CST up reply actions  

-1
x
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 10:25 PM CST up reply actions  

No....him disappearing......
at least from the political discussions.....his stupid shit is sometimes funny in other threads, but was so tired here even before he started!

by tklawless on Jan 9, 2008 8:07 AM CST up reply actions  

and huckabee
says, "not left, not right, not lateral but vertical. not down but up"

and oh yeah, huckabee is a tax fiend too.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 8, 2008 10:03 PM CST up reply actions  

If he was really a tax fiend
You'd like him..
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 10:25 PM CST up reply actions  

+1
Mitt Romney - Fred Thompson in 2008. "Real change that those who are wise can believe in."

by dstar442005 on Jan 8, 2008 10:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Barack
Seriously, he seems like a good guy, a quality person, i have nothing against the dood, just don't agree with his politics...
"Lois, undecided voters are the biggest idiots on the planet, try giving short, simple answers."

by Longhorn on Jan 8, 2008 10:13 PM CST reply actions  

*sigh*
:-(
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 8, 2008 10:31 PM CST reply actions  

Ditto...
...and I don't find myself saying that very often to you.

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 8, 2008 10:34 PM CST up reply actions  

I look forward to more...
...civil discussions with you.  Seriously.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 12:25 AM CST up reply actions  

I concur
I still believe that Obama has a much better chance against any Republican that wins it's party's nomination than Clinton does.

by hiafex on Jan 8, 2008 10:38 PM CST up reply actions  

Me too. He's completely dominated
the independent voters.  That will be the most important electability question.

I would really love to see McCain v. Obama, because it would be a battle for the independents, which would result in less partisanship, IMO.

If I owned a lightsaber, the blade color would be black light, so that I could use it to fight evil and to liven-up parties.

by rooster on Jan 8, 2008 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

agreed
and for the record, there is zero chance of me voting for Hillary.

by SteveP on Jan 8, 2008 10:42 PM CST up reply actions  

Is this because she is a woman?
Must read. "Only the Ball was White" Boomer Sooner!

by boomer1 on Jan 8, 2008 10:49 PM CST up reply actions  

why is that?
Seriously though... and I'm not a huge Hillary fan or anything... I've actually been an Obama supporter since the beginning. I'm not at all calling you out or anything - I honestly am just interested in why it is you dislike her so. People always seem to give very interesting and varied answers to that question.

by disposablehero on Jan 8, 2008 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

I think...
a lot of people have animosity towards her for standing by Bill with all the "cigar and stain" shit. I'm not speaking for him (or myself) but anyone who views "the family" as the background and most important part of our culture just won't vote for her. I do also think there is a lot of sexism where people think we can't have a "girl" as a President. Personally I will vote for whomever is running against the Republicans, period.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 10:58 PM CST up reply actions  

+1
Must read. "Only the Ball was White" Boomer Sooner!

by boomer1 on Jan 8, 2008 11:00 PM CST up reply actions  

her record as a politician
to state it simply.  basically, she does not represent change.  she supported the "with us or against us" bush foreign policy, and obviously showed her poor judgement by authorizing the iraq war. she supported the war up until public sentiment tilted against it, which is her modus operandi. her health care plan falls way short. and i think it's a joke to have 2 families run our country for my entire adult life.  

by SteveP on Jan 8, 2008 11:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Great points
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 11:10 PM CST up reply actions  

-1
eom
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

Great points? WTF?
Don't want 2 families running the country? I bet my ass he voted for Bush II....people don't like Hillary...because she was the spouse who was cheated on? Give me a f#cking break!

by tklawless on Jan 9, 2008 8:11 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't like her...
because I don't trust her. Criticize if you like.
"I would like to extend to you an invitation to the pants party. The...party. With the...with the pants. Party with pants?"

by BrickTamland on Jan 9, 2008 9:42 AM CST up reply actions  

As I said...
I don't agree with him, but I do think those are some reasons for why people won't vote for her. She is not far enough to the left for some liberals, as well as the reasons I listed above.

And what is your reasoning for why people won't vote for her? There clearly are a lot of those people out there.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 9, 2008 6:53 PM CST up reply actions  

Question for Obama people
How many of you Obama supporters would still vote for Clinton in the general, and how many would just not vote at all (or support someone else - i.e., an independent or republican candidate)?????

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 11:21 PM CST up reply actions  

i could possibly
vote McCain, or not at all. but i pretty much stopped caring in 2004, so i may not be a good representation.

by SteveP on Jan 8, 2008 11:26 PM CST up reply actions  

I'd vote for John Edwards
Not Clinton. She's a liar and I just wont support her smear attacks and old-school politicking.

by hiafex on Jan 8, 2008 11:33 PM CST up reply actions  

i'll still vote for her...
...but I won't campaign or canvas for her.

Only voting for her because we have to curtail the Federalist society Supreme Court that is building.  More Federalists on the bench will ruin our democracy.  Rubber stamps for Bush and his ideologues...just like the Republican congress was for the first 6 years of his administration.

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 12:24 AM CST up reply actions  

I would not...
Vote for Clinton.  For multiple reasons.

I have mixed feelings about Edwards.  If I were ranking candidates, it would probably go Obama, Richards, McCain, Guiliani/Romney...

....Hillary.

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 9, 2008 7:26 AM CST up reply actions  

Wow, really?
That's not far from my list, sans Edwards.

You wouldn't jump across the aisle and vote for Barack though, would you?

I don't trust Hillary either, fwiw.

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 10:36 AM CST up reply actions  

It would have been aisle-jumping...
...until a couple of years ago.  Now I consider myself an independent who leans conservative (mainly because of the economic reasons).  I would vote for Obama.  Either way, I like my choices a lot more this year than in 2004.

The grassroots movement that started in the 90's for the Republicans is what got me interested into politics when I was in high school (class of 2001).  I like the economic ideas of that conservatives put forward, was more into church and Christianity, and being a suburb kid made the choice easy for me.  

But a combination of things has changed that.  A big part of it is the Republicans controlling executive and legislative branches, and them being irresponsible with power.  Also, I grew up and gained more life experience.  Between college (admittedly, it was Baylor, but still) and a semester in Europe, plus graduating and living by myself in Dallas...just more life experiences.

I have this theory that the more people you meet, specifically, the wider spectrum of people you meet, the more centrist you become.  Not saying that you would be completely down the middle if you could meet everyone in the world, but just that you would understand the arguments from the other side better.

I'm sure it doesn't apply all the time, but that's my theory...

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 9, 2008 4:14 PM CST up reply actions  

Interesting points
It seems we would all be better off if we expanded our minds a little bit.

I was raised a Republican (in Amarillo), but grew disillusioned to the entire conservative thought process once I went to college (a fairly conservative engineering university in Colorado) and had some real life experiences.  Tutoring inner city Denver kids in math & computer science really opened my eyes to how ridiculously disadvantaged and shat upon by the system so many people in this country are.  And they really have no voice in the process or direct way out of poverty.

Apologies for directly attacking your viewpoint a couple days ago, without any regard for measure or reason.

I still don't understand what you see in this president or how you think future generations will see his presidency any differently.  That's pretty much right out of the Bill Kristol/Paul Wolfowitz PR manual, which doesn't seem like something you would parrot.

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 4:55 PM CST up reply actions  

No worries...
You're hardly the first to immediately choose to attack first.  It doesn't bother me as much because I've actually thought about the issues some...

My point isn't that Bush is a good, or even average for that matter, president.  My point is just that not everything he has done has been bad.  And if you can't see it, then it makes it hard for me to listen to your points rationally.

But I think highlights of his presidency would be his bringing education to the forefront (before 9/11) as opposed to just throwing more money at the problem (granted, it hasn't worked out fantastically well, but I appreciate trying something new), his response in rallying the country after 9/11, helping to streamline the way intelligence works in this country, and passing tax cuts to help a struggling economy.  Also, his attempts at increasing gas mileage restrictions (with Obama) and at an immigration solution were good efforts in the right direction.

Despite all of this, I think most everyone will be happy to move on in 2009.

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 9, 2008 10:35 PM CST up reply actions  

Hmmm
Well the major part of the problem with Bush's No Child Left Behind is that there was very little funding for the program!  If anything, that has set education way back in this country.  I have MANY teacher/principal friends who KNOW that their students are no smarter for learning how to take a test.  There's got to be a better way to evaluate teachers' performances than via standardized tests.  I don't understand how someone can appreciate trying something new when the 'something new' is so ridiculously awful.  How does that, a good president/decider make?

So we wholeheartedly disagree on the education issue.

After 9/11 he rallied the country, sure.  Rallied us and the media right into the worst foreign policy decision in US history.  The strikes in Afghanistan were smart and decisive, but he didn't finish the job.  So another place we disagree.

If by "streamline the way intelligence works in this country", you mean "remove most of the liberties guaranteed Americans in the Constitution" then yes, we agree on that point.

On the contrary, the tax cuts have hurt this economy and the economy of your children and grandchildren (I'm not having any, but I care about yours anyway).  But what's hurt this economy more have been his lax approach to the market and corporations.  The market will NOT regulate itself.  That has been proven time and time again.  And when Greenspan (yes, I know he's gone, but his legacy lives on) and the other Fed operators bail out the corporations by feeding more cash into the system, it disincentivizes them to make good decisions and take measured risk.

Mileage restrictions, ok, but they should have been done in 2002, not 5 years later, when it was being forced through by a non-rubber stamp Dem congress.

Immigration is the only place I give Bush any credit.  His plan made sense.  So what if it's amnesty?  It's the only logical way to deal with 2+ million illegals.

So I guess we're 1.5 out of 6.

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 12:14 AM CST up reply actions  

...hurt this economy more has* been...
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 12:15 AM CST up reply actions  

bingo
on all points
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 12:23 AM CST up reply actions  

Obama...
this guy is becoming a great orator. Every time I hear him talk I can see why he is scooping up the independents. Again tonight he was great.

Hillary did well also as I thought her speech was strong. I could only imagine if these two could "take one for the team" and run on the same ticket. I don't believe there is a Republican out there that can beat either one of them, but together, wow.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 10:52 PM CST reply actions  

Obama's speech
was excellent.  Clinton's was pretty good, especially since that isn't her strength.  Edwards leaves me wondering why he's even on my TV...

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 10:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Yep...
and as gossamer said, I think the longer he is in the race the more it hurts Obama. I do believe the majority of his supporters will go over to Obama's side when he is finally out.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 11:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Hopefully they can keep it civil
And whoever comes up short will end up as the #2. Either way, that ticket would be unstoppable.
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Jan 8, 2008 10:58 PM CST up reply actions  

Eli Manning is.....
I'm sorry, I couldn't help it.
Fire Todd Dodge.

by sprite on Jan 8, 2008 11:03 PM CST up reply actions  

+100
Your Texas Rangers: Shooting for whichever year best suits our marketing campaign!

by BudLight on Jan 8, 2008 11:40 PM CST up reply actions  

My favorite part...
...of that commercial is that the first time I saw it, he played the Cowboys and had 3 delay of game penalties.  While hawking a watch.

You just can't even make up that sort of thing...

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 9, 2008 7:29 AM CST up reply actions  

Concur...
that is my biggest fear. That the Clinton machine will start the attack ads against Obama. I can't see Obama doing anything more than defending himself but let's hope they keep it cordial.

If Hillary had lost there is no doubt in my mind she would have gone after him harder, hopefully now that she won NH she will play nice until at least super Tuesday.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 11:03 PM CST up reply actions  

That won't happen
Clinton would never be VP - do you really think she wants to sit around for 8 years while someone else owns the Oval Office?  She's already done that, remember?  She knows she is better off becoming the Senate Majority Leader and being a powerful legislative force.  

Likewise, Obama has nothing to gain by making Hillary president.  If she wins, then he has to wait 8 years to run again, at which point his whole "bring change to Washington" thing makes little sense, since he is the residing VP.  But if a Hillary-Obama ticket happens to somehow lose, he becomes damaged goods like Edwards (because you KNOW the Clintons will somehow deflect blame onto him).  He's better off stepping aside and running again in 4 years, regardless of whether Hillary is the incumbent or not.

Yes, combining the two would be a powerful ticket.  But there is absolutely nothing in it for the VP in those scenarios.  

by JBImaknee on Jan 8, 2008 11:17 PM CST up reply actions  

Well I don't think...
it will happen either, but I think Obama should consider it if Hillary wins. Your points are well taken on how he could be the scapegoat if things went bad, but if her presidency is viewed better than "W's" (which I don't see how it couldn't be) then Obama would gain that experience which is the only real knock on him right now. He is still young enough to run again in 8 years as well.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 11:33 PM CST up reply actions  

-1
eom
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 11:45 PM CST up reply actions  

agree
definitely sounded like Barack was hoping South Carolina was watching. an excellent speech, very much in the style of MLK (not at all comparing the two men, just the pattern and tone of the speech itself).

and on CNN a while ago, while their little roundtable was talking, one of the guys mentioned something like this....

"according to our sources, Barack Obama may be getting a very, very significant endorsement tomorrow in Nevada"

not sure if he's talking about Edwards or Richardson dropping out and endorsing Obama, or just some sort of big time endorsement that would help him solely in Nevada.

by disposablehero on Jan 8, 2008 11:13 PM CST up reply actions  

I think the Nevada endorsement
Is the Culinary Union which has a very large affect on the elections in Nevada. I've been watching MSNBC most of the night and they've mentioned the union several times. However, after the Clinton win, the National Culinary Union is trying to persuade the state union to be neutral instead of support Obama. The state union is suppose to announce who they are supporting tomorrow.

by hiafex on Jan 8, 2008 11:20 PM CST up reply actions  

My sources
tell me it's Jerry Tarkanian.

by Spoorts!! on Jan 9, 2008 12:14 AM CST up reply actions  

A first
This is the first time since the beginning of the modern caucus/primary era (1976) that 4 different candidates have won each of the first four contests.

I think this is a good thing. This means the election on both sides will last at least until Super Tuesday next month. Heck, who know? Texas might even have a say in this thing on one or both sides when we vote in March. That would be sweet. I haven't even seen any polls in this state, but it is fun to speculate:

  1. I'd have to think that Hillary would be the favorite on the Dem side, but Obama would have a very good shot in the Lone Star State, particularly if African Americans rally behind him.
  2. If Edwards somehow is able to hold on until Texas, maybe by winning in Nevada or South Carolina, and some southern states on Super Tuesday, Texas might be a serious boost to his campaign. He's always been able to raise a lot of money here and has a lot of support in the legal community. And he talks like a Southerner which helps.
  3. I'd assume that Huckabee might be the favorite to win here, or possibly McCain. Rick Perry would look like a inept jackass if he can't move any votes for his boy Giuliani even in Texas.
I'm glad two tiny, unrepresentative states aren't going to have the last word on the nominations. Democracy, what a concept!
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Jan 8, 2008 10:56 PM CST reply actions  

Well said...
I can only imagine if Utah had a...just kidding, at least I still have Cali.

It would be nice to have all states vote on the same day with no media coverage to sway the voting. Then people would realy have to vote non-bias.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 8, 2008 11:09 PM CST up reply actions  

1. ?????
I thought every Texan was required by law to hate the Clintons.

I wouldn't write off Iowa and NH as unrepresentative.  They're very good states in the sense that they have about an even distribution of Dem, Republican, and Independent voters.

They are light on minority representation; the Latin vote is very important in Texas and California.  Nevertheless, I think they're excellent training grounds for the candidates.  It gives the candidates a well-informed and earnest group with quick feedback on personality and policy issues due to the rapid campaigning over such small geographic areas.  The result is that candidates can sharpen their message and presentation before it has to be played on a national and less personal scale.

Think Clinton will abandon all of this heartfelt politics rhetoric after NH?  Nope.  She found out that it will need to be one of her campaign's most immediately identifiable qualities, thanks to the response in IA and NH.

Sorry to gripe.  I really like the way the caucuses and primaries are set up.

If I owned a lightsaber, the blade color would be black light, so that I could use it to fight evil and to liven-up parties.

by rooster on Jan 8, 2008 11:35 PM CST up reply actions  

I hear you
There are good and bad things about Iowa and NH going first. You outlined the good, and I don't disagree with what you said. It has simply been frustrating in the last two Democratic primaries that everything (basically) was decided after NH. I think we are better off with an extended look at the candidates, and it's important to have other parts of the country (with more representative populations) have their say. Also, I blame Iowa for the sham and travesty that is ethanol. Kudos to John McCain for coming out and saying it this year.
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Jan 8, 2008 11:49 PM CST up reply actions  

I hate ethanol
My stupid ChemEng background doesn't allow me to be blissfully ignorant of the fact that ethanol doesn't solve any problems.

I agree that Iowa being first is a big reason that people keep hyping up EtOH as a fuel.  Enough senators have delusions of running for President someday that they ignore the fact that it costs more energy to produce than it provides and it ruining our once healthy food generation industry.

by JBImaknee on Jan 9, 2008 7:26 PM CST up reply actions  

Word
Politics is to blame for a lot of irrational shit. Like the ongoing embargo on Cuba. Or the war on drugs.
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Jan 9, 2008 7:32 PM CST up reply actions  

What I don't get is...
it's seems like ethanol could be a decent option for fuel, just not when it's from corn.

It's like they figured out how to get ethanol from corn and all the corn farmers got big dollar signs in their eyes.  That's not how it works.  Growing and selling corn works because of the amount of money each ear of corn makes as food.  First big problem is, there's probably not enough land that you could grow corn on to seriously dent how much ethanol we would need.  Second, you need so much corn that it doesn't make a whole lot of economic sense.

What could work maybe, and I don't really know the numbers here, is if you switched to cellulose.  All of a sudden, you're using farm waste and crappy land that isn't used for farming (grasses and such, not as big a nutrient need).  That's a LOT cheaper, I just don't know how much.

It's amazing that our government could get this close to figuring out bio-fuel and then be so amazingly far in the end.

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 9, 2008 8:45 PM CST up reply actions  

This sticked thread
Is annoying.

It creats too much politics talk.

In my opinion, you should have simply banned politics in non-politics threads.

Then people could make politics threads naturally, and occasionally. Rather than this semi-permanent junk.

Would be better.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 8, 2008 11:46 PM CST reply actions  

Hillary still uphill battle
I dunno how she's gonna win South Carolina.

Durned if I know who will win.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 1:15 AM CST reply actions  

Lotsa black folks in South Carolina
It's supposed to be Obama's state to lose, but that's what everyone thought about NH, too.
Free Alexi Ogando!

by ghtd36 on Jan 9, 2008 2:18 AM CST up reply actions  

"Black Folks" love them some Clintons..
Edwards will be the one left out...even though he was born there.

by tklawless on Jan 9, 2008 8:16 AM CST up reply actions  

Bill still see's...
himself as the "first black President" in many ways...I think it will be a real dog-fight.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 9, 2008 6:57 PM CST up reply actions  

I live in SC
I've seen one Obama sticker.

And the person driving was white.

Apparently black people here don't accept Obama as being black because he's not a descendant of black Americans or something.

I really think Clinton takes this state. She'll split the black vote with Obama, and Edwards will siphon off enough independent votes from Obama to give Hillary the win.

"God plays by his own rules, folks. And HGH is f***ing legal as hell up in heaven." -Andy Pettitte

by thedirkatron on Jan 10, 2008 12:21 AM CST up reply actions  

sadly, I think you're right
As a result of the (perhaps only perceived) Bradley Effect, I'm never taking another poll for granted.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 1:17 AM CST up reply actions  

on the contrary...
...I don't think bumper stickers are the best way to measure support this early in the primary process?  we don't even know who the nominee will be.  why put a sticker on your car that you'd have to remove < a month later?

what about lawn signs / graffiti tags?

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 1:22 AM CST up reply actions  

Actual delegate count
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22419475

Huckabee is your rep leader!!!

Although, this delegate crap makes no sense, Thousands of rules and caveats. It seems like many delegates can vote for whoever they want anyway. Such as the superdelegates on the Democrat side MSNBC isn't counting.

Hillary and Obama get the same delegates for NH also, for whatever reason.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 3:18 AM CST reply actions  

Wiki has a different delegate count
In which Romney is the leader.

So umm, whatever.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 4:05 AM CST up reply actions  

I wonder
if we will hear any good "Clinton getting out the vote" stories.  Buying votes is probably a good investment for that campaign.
"As of now they're (The Astros) world series favorites. Period." - Sharky

by DJCahill on Jan 9, 2008 3:51 AM CST reply actions  

Chris Matthews
Has an interesting theory.

He said he thinks white people were lying to pollsters to appear more progressive.

Because Hillary had such a consistent win, with the same margin all night, that you could pull any section of the state and the results would be the same. So basically it couldn't be innacurate polling.

And the difference with Iowa was, in Iowa they had to go in a room with other people out in the open to vote. So basically they couldn't vote their true (supposedly racist) feelings in Iowa.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 7:40 AM CST reply actions  

It's the...
Race Card!

Of course, it would be crazy just to think that people change their minds, are sitting on the fence, or just weren't polled efficiently enough.  It must definetly be race.

Are there some people who wouldn't vote for Obama because he's black? Probably.  I just don't think that those people would vote for him if he were white, because of the policies is putting forward and what he represents.  I also think (hope!) that there aren't as many of those people as the media thinks there are.

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 9, 2008 7:48 AM CST up reply actions  

Do you believe him?
About a year ago they did some race polls and democrats didn't think the country could elect a black candidate.  I was thinking that Iowa couldn't be trusted because of the open ballot too. It very well could be an issue for undecideds.

by ab03 on Jan 9, 2008 3:01 PM CST up reply actions  

Damn....
I'm not sure I just wouldn't rather have Ross Perot than any of these clowns...and I'm talking about both parties.  sigh
I'd love for part of the "new look" to be a return to the red uniforms of the 1990s. - Ian Kinsler

by ortonius on Jan 9, 2008 8:19 AM CST reply actions  

Yeah,
its tough to pick a favorite candidate without getting to a "lesser of evils" approach.
"As of now they're (The Astros) world series favorites. Period." - Sharky

by DJCahill on Jan 9, 2008 8:25 AM CST up reply actions  

Could you
Enlighten us on your views of the candidates?

by hiafex on Jan 9, 2008 10:52 AM CST up reply actions  

Do you remember ross Perot?
he was really really bad. And I'm pretty sure his foreign policy debates would blow. Those guys are fun as an f you to the establishment but other than that they just aren't real candidates

by ab03 on Jan 9, 2008 2:56 PM CST up reply actions  

Because of people like you
eom
LSB : Trolls :: Rangers : 4th OF'ers

by inactive lsb user on Jan 9, 2008 5:07 PM CST up reply actions  

please no bloomberg
my dream independent candidate would be pat buchanon.

pat > all the republican candidates.  i think sharky would agree with me here.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 5:10 PM CST reply actions  

What about...
...Gingrich?  Or Hagel?
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 5:39 PM CST up reply actions  

no on hagel
and HELL no on gingrich.

gingrich had his shot.  he broke his promise with america.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 6:00 PM CST up reply actions  

broke his promise?
are you talking about his affair?  Or his success as SotH?  I don't remember him actually lying about anything...

by JBImaknee on Jan 9, 2008 6:53 PM CST up reply actions  

ugh...
Buchanon = Lou Dobbs
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 9, 2008 7:00 PM CST up reply actions  

Huckabee
I cant believe how much the mainstream media continues to simply ignore this guy as not a serious threat.

Here's my prediction, he's expected to win SC, but I'm going to say he takes Michigan this week, or either runs a VERY strong second, something like that. Michigan is going to be Huckabees shot heard round the world, the point were the media is going to be forced to open their eyes to this guy. I mean you can just see it unfolding. Not one network is even mentioning Huck in Mich, it's all McCain versus Romney. But the latest Michigan poll I see up on RCP is Huck+1. And that's the most recent poll.

Huck takes Mich and SC, he's going to take Florida then. You look at the Florida polls he's already right near the top, now add the momentum of a Mich+SC win and it would be over in Florida. and I think he's then relatively unstoppable with all that momentum into super Tuesday. That is how I see things shaking out. It's unbelievable how the media is turning a blind eye to Huck.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 6:28 PM CST reply actions  

Furthermore
There's a ton of margin for error even in this plan. Huck doesn't have to do jack in Mich. A lot of people think he's not even going to worry about Mich and concentrate on SC. He'd come in a strong 2nd or third in Mich without even trying.

Then he'd still pull off the SC+Florida combo pretty easily.

Michigan isn't even needed for Huck to win, but as I say, I predict it will be his shot heard round the world anyway..

http://race42008.com/2008/01/09/poll-watch-rossman-group-michigan-gop-primary/

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 6:48 PM CST up reply actions  

Bill Richardson is out
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20080110/D8U2MD7O2.html

Probably helps Hillary the most, as she is better positioned to pick up most of whatever Hispanic support he would have had.

And now, from my count, there are no candidates left who have been a cabinet secretary...

by JBImaknee on Jan 9, 2008 6:58 PM CST reply actions  

Well
To be fair, Richardson was the only one who ever had been a cabinet secretary. Unless you count Tommy Thompson, I guess, and he didn't even make it Iowa.
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Jan 9, 2008 7:02 PM CST up reply actions  

True,
I was just struck by the realization that Richardson is the only one who had experience both as an Executive (governor) as well as actually having first hand knowledge about the federal executive branch.  

Thinking about it, I guess Secretaries don't often run for president.  They usually are given a position after losing the nomination, or they resign in disgrace by taking the fall for their President's mistakes

by JBImaknee on Jan 9, 2008 7:08 PM CST up reply actions  

Richardson drops out
Not a huge surprise at this point. I'm from New Mexico, so I've known about Richardson (aka Porky aka  Fred Flintstone) ever since I was a kid. I've never been a big fan of his. It's an interesting election, though, given that none of the most "qualified" candidates (including Biden or Dodd) could gain any traction to speak of, at least on the Democratic side.
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Jan 9, 2008 6:58 PM CST reply actions  

Er
Maybe not. Now MSNBC is reporting that Richardson's people are denying that he's dropping out. What's with all these false reports about candidates dropping out? First Fred Thompson, then the Hillary story on Drudge, now this. Weird.
But that river of tears has dried for all of us.

by trza on Jan 9, 2008 7:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Well...
...you can consider the source on Drudge.  But whenever a story on CNN or wherever begins with "Sources: ...", I ignore it altogether.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 9, 2008 7:19 PM CST up reply actions  

What do you dislike about Richardson?
Rex Hudler is in demand as a motivational speaker.

by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 8:29 AM CST up reply actions  

probably...
...the fact that he's a Red Sox AND a Yankees fan.

The left equivalent of Giuliani

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 11:33 AM CST up reply actions  

Examples?
Rex Hudler is in demand as a motivational speaker.

by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 1:00 PM CST up reply actions  

On Meet The Press...
...Richardson told Tim Russert that he's a Red Sox AND a Yankees fan.

Giuliani said the same thing when he was in Massachusetts, trying to drum up support.  Later claimed he was a fan of "the AL".

That's the only comparison I was making.

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 1:33 PM CST up reply actions  

this is the first i heard
of richardson saying that.  but it's no where near as bad as rudy.

rudy is a new yorker.  he's supposed to HATE the sox.

i wouldn't expect ted kennedy to be a yankee fan.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 10, 2008 7:13 PM CST up reply actions  

Diebold cheated for Hillary!
http://drunkardslamppost.wordpress.com/2008/01/09/diebold-and-new-hampshire/

Doh! Looney lefties thwarted by Diebold again! Now Diebold is cheating for the slightly less extremist extreme lefty, even!

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 7:44 PM CST reply actions  

hillary isn't liberal
she's just more liberal than you'd like.

as far as the diebold stats...if those are true, there are other variables not discussed.  such as, did hillary win all the diebold districts?  did obama win all the hand count districts?

then there is the fact that the different districts have different demographics.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 8:10 PM CST up reply actions  

Stop feeding the troll gossamer...
anyone with half a brain knows Hillary isn't liberal. She is a moderate democrat just like McCain is a moderate republican. Perhaps if we stop responding to him, he will just go away.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 9, 2008 8:15 PM CST up reply actions  

this is not true
how often do you see sharky respond to his own posts?  how often does he respond 4 times to himself?
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 8:17 PM CST up reply actions  

I know...
wishful thinking.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 9, 2008 9:05 PM CST up reply actions  

Yo, Gossamer
Hey marooon, my post was sarcastic. I'm not a looney lefty, I dont believe there's cheating in every election that doesn't go my way like all you looney lefties do. I was poking fun at you.

And both Obama and Clinton are extremists.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 9:16 PM CST up reply actions  

Really
How could anyone read my post and it not be obvious sarcasm?
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 9, 2008 9:20 PM CST up reply actions  

my mistake
i'm still upset over kennedy cheating to beat nixon (seriously, i <3 nixon)

i like you sharky.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 9, 2008 9:29 PM CST up reply actions  

Well...
John Kerry is now endorsing Obama. Not sure how much this will help but it certainly can't hurt.

As for Edwards...ouch. Not even the man who picked you as his VP candidate in 2004 will endorse you. I would think this is the nail in the coffin for him.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 10, 2008 2:15 PM CST reply actions  

Kerry probably has convinced himself
that he lost because of Edwards.  Not that there is much evidence for that, but it only natural that one does that (after all, Edwards didn't exactly bring southern states to Kerry like he was supposed to).

Also, Kerry isn't going to pick a sure-loser.  You want to be thought of as the King(or Queen)-maker in making an endorsement...

by JBImaknee on Jan 10, 2008 2:25 PM CST up reply actions  

gore endorsed dean
in 2004 over lieberman
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 10, 2008 7:14 PM CST up reply actions  

I think it could hurt...
...among right-leaning independents.  Kerry is perceived as being a scaaaaary Massachusetts liberal.  Plus he's a fucking dolt.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 7:19 PM CST up reply actions  

Bingo!
Talk about shaking my confidence in Obama.

I just pray that we don't have to listen to another rambling speech from him if Obama does win the primaries..

by GhettoBear04 on Jan 10, 2008 10:49 PM CST up reply actions  

Disagree...
what has changed about Obama? Just because Kerry endorses him now you don't have confidence in him, why?
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 10, 2008 10:51 PM CST up reply actions  

My bad...I apologize.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 11, 2008 5:47 PM CST up reply actions  

I don't think Kerry is a dolt either...
I just don't believe he has any testicular fortitude.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 11, 2008 8:55 PM CST up reply actions  

Much like Romney
he sways with whatever breezes are there at the time.  Its a Boston thing I guess.
"We should have bombed it (Auschwitz)"-President Bush

by DJCahill on Jan 12, 2008 4:31 AM CST up reply actions  

Paul is a Racist
Thought this was noteworthy...  just in addition to what has been repeated throughout these threads

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/01/10/paul.newsletters/index.html

Conspiracy of the liberal media?  Discuss.

by TheBZA on Jan 10, 2008 3:48 PM CST reply actions  

Not a conspiracy
Poor judgment on Paul's part for allowing a newsletter with his name in the title to exist in which he did not have a role as mandatory reviewing editor.  Newsletters during the late 80s and early 90s were much like the blogs of today.  Many people debated and contributed thoughts and ideas.  You had to subscribe to be able to read and contribute.  

This is not a new discovery.  This has been brought up in many of Paul's congressional campaigns by his opponents and his position and rebuttal has always been the same.  You can read his most recent press release here http://www.ronpaul2008.com/press-releases/125/ron-paul-statement-on-the-new-republic-article-regardi ng-old-newsletters

His congressional voting record does not match with any of the terrible things written in the newsletters nor do his longstanding views on the issue of racism noted here http://www.ronpaul2008.com/issues/racism/

Ron Paul 2008 www.ronpaul2008.com

by jshcmp on Jan 10, 2008 5:09 PM CST up reply actions  

Huckabee taking blows today
Two new SC polls show him trailing McCain now..

I stick by him though!

Just temporary NH bounce..plus I think Huck is a guy who will get really underrepresented in polls. I mean he won Iowa by nine and I dont think any poll had him close to that margin..

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 7:19 PM CST reply actions  

McCain or Huckabee
Has the clearest path.

McCain is the frontrunner. If he wins Michigan, he could just snowball SC. Somebody said the first Republican to string together two wins in a row might just snowball. That could be McCain if he can take Michigan.

Huckabee could do the same. One recent poll has him up one in Mich. One has him down 11 in third place.

Romney could win Nevada, but he pretty much has to win Mich. Because he's third in SC currently. But really, he's not that much worse off than McCain. It's just McCain has NH momentum, really. I mean Romney polls just a few points down in SC, too.

And Rudy had to pin all his hopes on Florida. He has to hope the other states just keep going to different people, rather than one guy like McCain building any momentum. His is the hardest path..because I dont think he's that strong in Florida anyway. His lead is tenuous.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 7:37 PM CST up reply actions  

what about
the 2 different polls from michigan that came out today.

1 has romney in 2nd back 4 points, the other has him in 1st up 8 points.

i really don't want him to win anything.  boo romney!

go huck and mccain (mccain moreso)

i like you sharky.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
http://www.myspace.com/igotsculture

by gossamer on Jan 10, 2008 8:25 PM CST up reply actions  

New Michigan polls
Where are these Gossamer? I have not seen new polls that agree with those numbers..
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 9:51 PM CST up reply actions  

hey gossamer...
...in case you're looking to cite your sources.

Strategic Vision: http://www.strategicvision.biz/political/michigan_poll_011008.htm
McCain 29
Romney 20

Rossman Group: http://www.rossmanmartin.com/press_releases/article_read.cfm
Huckabee 23
Romney 22
McCain 18

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 10:02 PM CST up reply actions  

Rossman
Tech neanderthals at Rossman.

You have to go here: http://www.rossmanmartin.com/press_releases/view_all.cfm

And then click on "Presidential Primary Survey: GOP in Three-way Race, Clinton leads Democrat Field"

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 10:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Those polls
I've seen. They dont match gossamers numbers, which was why I was wondering if there was two new polls out or something.
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 10:08 PM CST up reply actions  

that's it
those are the 2 polls i was citing from memory.  sorry if i was off by a point or 2.

1 poll has romney down 9 in 2nd the other has him in 2nd down 1 but ahead of mccain.

i was wrong and i'm sorry.

but the point is the same.  polls will give you a rough idea but can be off by a bit (as evidenced in NH)

2 polls from the same day top 3:

poll a has
1 mccain 29%
2 romney 20%
3 huck 18%

poll b has
1 huck 23%
2 romney 22%
3 mccain 18%

those are quite off.  mccain is 11 points off, romney only 2 and huck at 5.

i don't know which poll is better so i'd put equal weight in them both and end up with this:

mccain - 24%
romney - 21%
huck - 20.5%

of course those WON'T be the numbers in tomorrow's poll or on the primary.  but if they are, that's absolutely it for romney, 100%. especially since he'd put his resources all in there.  but my guess is that he'll do better than that 21% and probably win it. if not, he'll still lead in the delegate counts, put he'll do progressively worse in each state.

as of right now in south carolina it's

huck 33%
mccain 21%
romney 14%

of course romney has given up in SC.  when thompson loses there, he's gotta drop out.  and i'd expect he endorses mccain.  huck will probably win there, though mccain thinks he can gain points.

now sharky, if huck wins SC like it seems, and he pulls ahead in michigan in that 3 horse race (i doubt it, romney will prob pull it out) then he's the republican nominee.  

rudy is praying that romney wins michigan.

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
NIXON: NOW MORE THAN EVER

by gossamer on Jan 10, 2008 11:04 PM CST up reply actions  

Nope
There are two new polls today that show McCain>Huck in SC.

Rasmussen has McCain 27 Huckabee 24.
Fox News McCain 25 Huck 18

As for the two Mich polls..

The Rossman group one was 300 voters and a higher margin of error. The Strategic Visions one was 700 voters.

On the surface you'd have to give the SV one more credit. But in looking for reasons to prefer the one that has Huck ahead, it was later. Rossman was taken on 16-1/7 while SV was 1/4-1/6. And also SV's Iowa poll was way off, it had Romney winning by two points..

"The Democrats want change, they want the change in your pockets"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 11:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Huckabee support
"I stick by him though!"

Like you stuck by Thompson?

Rex Hudler is in demand as a motivational speaker.

by Brian Thomas on Jan 10, 2008 8:39 PM CST up reply actions  

Next thing you know...
...he'll be making a ridiculous wager with you.  And then renege on it 30 minutes later.
Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 8:52 PM CST up reply actions  

Good to hear I reneged on the bet
So that means I dont have to pay it, right?

After all, apparently I already reneged so..

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 9:50 PM CST up reply actions  

Err
Were did I say I supported Thompson?

Oh that's right, I never did.

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 9:48 PM CST up reply actions  

I'm screenshotting it here...
...since he's sure to delete it soon.

And the coup de grâce:

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 11, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions  

hahahahahahaha...
what a jackass.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 11, 2008 5:48 PM CST up reply actions  

lol
i remember that now.  wish i would have gotten in on that lol
send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
NIXON: NOW MORE THAN EVER

by gossamer on Jan 11, 2008 7:07 PM CST up reply actions  

O'Reilly
Has a story I'm watching that Indiana required photo ID to vote. Cuts down on fraud.

ACLU sued, claimed it discriminated against the poor.

What a joke..

Looks like ACLU is going to lose, though.

ACLU trying to protect liberal voter fraud..

"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 7:25 PM CST reply actions  

Has anyone noticed
that the candidates appear to be looking down at the podium more in this debate than they normally do?  Did FNC provide the questions in advance?  Is that standard protocol?

by Spoorts!! on Jan 10, 2008 9:10 PM CST reply actions  

No
It's a conservative plot.
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 9:44 PM CST up reply actions  

Yes
Clearly, that's what he said.
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 9:44 PM CST up reply actions  

I can't believe...
...I'm admitting to watching Fox News.  But I am.

Paul just OWNED the rest of the candidates by pointing out their 'conservative' records in response to a question about his electability as a conservative.

Then he pointed out the massive elephant in the room: how the US is borrowing money from China to prop up Musharraf and the failed policy in Iraq where our brave men and women are dying.  Awesome!

No racist or homophobic comments from him yet, so I'm gonna keep watching...

McCain is so freaking boring.  Bob Dole 08.

Obama - ??? 2008 : Real change we can all believe in.

by RangerMoto on Jan 10, 2008 9:26 PM CST reply actions  

Fox asked hard questions
But I expect Fox to be fair and balanced. No doubt CNN lobs Obama softballs.
"Barack Obama wants change-he wants to raise taxes"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 9:45 PM CST up reply actions  

It is painful...
to watch FNC, but at times rather amusing.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 10, 2008 10:48 PM CST up reply actions  

It is painful to watch CNN
But at times rather amusing.
"The Democrats want change, they want the change in your pockets"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 10:55 PM CST up reply actions  

yep
they have so many gadgets that don't work half the time. especially those stupid touch screens.

just have the chyron and graphics people take care of it!

send me nominations for the Hall of the Very Good
http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
NIXON: NOW MORE THAN EVER

by gossamer on Jan 10, 2008 11:05 PM CST up reply actions  

War
I have come to the conclusion America supports big government and loves war because it's the biggest government of all.

Especially the Democrats.

There's virtually no way we're leaving Iraq anytime soon..

It's like trying to end social security or farm subsidizes. It doesn't matter if 99.9% of people supported, you couldn't do a damn thing about it. This is not a democracy, it's rule by those who get the checks.

"The Democrats want change, they want the change in your pockets"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 10, 2008 10:58 PM CST reply actions  

Exactly
like Conagra, and Boeing, and Halliburton, and all the other companies the Republicans send checks to.
"As of now they're (The Astros) world series favorites. Period." - Sharky

by DJCahill on Jan 11, 2008 5:05 AM CST up reply actions  

Aww
I know you're mad I bashed Dems, so you had to try to turn it around.

You just dont wanna face facts Cahill. Both sides want it. Play ignorant if you want, I know it's your area of expertise.

"The Democrats want change, they want the change in your pockets"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 11, 2008 7:24 AM CST up reply actions  

Maybe
If Dems weren't so busy in airport restrooms hunting for Larry Craig's semen, they'd have time to stop the war..
"The Democrats want change, they want the change in your pockets"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 11, 2008 7:25 AM CST up reply actions  

I don't think the Dems
have to look hard for self loathing Homos amongst the Republicans.  They are pretty much everywhere.  
"We should have bombed it (Auschwitz)"-President Bush

by DJCahill on Jan 11, 2008 10:40 AM CST up reply actions  

I know both sides line up to give money away
for some reason, you think the Republicans do less of it than the Democrats, which I don't understand.

Its the same thing, just different check cashers.  There is a reason that Republicans get fat checks from corporations.  Its so the gravy train keeps flowing.

"We should have bombed it (Auschwitz)"-President Bush

by DJCahill on Jan 11, 2008 10:43 AM CST up reply actions  

This poll
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/pe nnsylvania/pennsylvania_2008_presidential_election

This poll shows McCain beating both Clinton and Obama handily in Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania and Ohio of course are pretty much the two crucial swing states in recent elections, in fact Pennsylvania went to the Democrats last time and Bush only needed Ohio to win.

I fail to see then why all you hear on TV is what a uphill struggle the Repuiblican candidate will have...

Especially if Obama keeps talking about ending the Iraq war he will lose..all these people getting cut checks in Iraq will personally see to it. All the rest of us dont have any dog in the fight so we dont care. That is why government programs dont die. If you cant kill social security what makes you think you can kill a war..

"The Democrats want change, they want the change in your pockets"-Rudy Giuliani on "change".

by Sharky on Jan 11, 2008 7:37 AM CST reply actions  

So...
NYC/LA how the hell can you be a gay conservative?

You and Andrew Sullivan are the only ones I know and I just don't get it.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jan 11, 2008 11:13 PM CST reply actions  

+1
He must be confused.

Poor guy.

LSB : Trolls :: Rangers : 4th OF'ers

by inactive lsb user on Jan 11, 2008 11:57 PM CST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Minors Thread (Early-mid May)

Recent FanPosts

Macho_man_randy_savage_small
Pre (and maybe post) game OT 2 - 5/16
Small
MOD#2 Rangers Draft Board
Profyawn_small
5/16 OT Thread
Small
MOD #1: Texas Rangers (Draft Prep)
Neftali_old_timey_small
5/15/2012 OT
Hamilton-queen_small
05.14.12 OT DEUCE
Nolan-ryan-hof-1_small
Week 7 Fantasy Baseball Thread
Brandon_small
OT: GoT S2E17 Discussion (SPOILERS)
180px-angry_dome_small
5/14 OT
Pos_small
2nd Game Theory

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris

Editor

477845_small ghostofErikThompson

Author

Matchstick_small Brad