Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


OT: Economic collapse

Wow, somebody posted this list of today/yesterday/somethings headlines today

 

Today's Headlines:

# Stocks in U.S. Tumble as Dow Industrials Drop Below 9,000; GM, Exxon Slide

# Mutual Fund Withdrawals Jump to Record $72 Billion as Investors Seek Haven

# GM Shares Fall to Lowest Level Since 1950; S&P May Cut Automaker's Rating

# Leveraged Loan Index Plummets to Record as Hedge Funds, Banks Sell Assets

# U.S. Treasury Plans Bank-Stake Purchases Within Weeks to Shore Up Capital

# Iceland Seizes Kaupthing as Banking Industry Collapses Under Debt Weight

# VIX Options Index Climbs to Record Above 60 as Credit Market Stays Frozen

# Bush Will Meet With G-7 Finance Chiefs to Tackle Credit Crisis, Aide Says

# Libor Holds Central Banks Hostage as London Rate Freezes Worldwide Lending

# Fear Trumps Greed as Market Worries Amplify News, Paralyze World Economy

# Royal Bank of Scotland Loses Credibility After Goodwin's ABN Amro Purchase

# Central Banks Fail to Alleviate `Logjam' in Money Market: Chart of the Day

 

Also this:


There are very strong rumors that municipalities and States will default on their bonds this week. California and Massachusetts look like good candidates. The cessation of many government services and checks could follow. Iceland and Pakistan are on the verge of bankruptcy. Wonderful, a nuclear armed Islamic state thrown into chaos.

And, probably from a liberal nutjob

My guess is that we could see disruptions in the supply of food within two weeks, with food riots within a month. If that is the scenario then we may see the suspension of the election and...well I can't bring myself to say it.

 

Dow is plunging..some are predicting it to hit 6,000

 

Well, it's something else. I almost hate posting this cus I dont want to give err,, slightly less intelligent people like Cahill another forum to spew venom at Republicans and blame them for all of it, but whatever.

 

0 recs | Comment 69 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

my 401k was down 33% for the year (thru Sept)

luckily, i don’t have much in there anyways. I can’t imagine how sick I’d be feeling if I was over 40 and had substantial losses.

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Oct 10, 2008 8:49 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am over 40 and have substantial losses

luckily by now I am mostly in cash. I just have to worry about the inflation that the fix will inevitably cause.

Remember the good old days of peace, prosperity, sound economic systems, and budget surpluses? 2000 seems so long ago.

"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky

by DJCahill on Oct 10, 2008 8:54 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

I miss that Republican Congress.

by Sharky on Oct 10, 2008 9:08 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   1 recs

And you love you some

George “Herbert Hoover” Bush

"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky

by DJCahill on Oct 10, 2008 9:11 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

lol

word.

posthocergopropterhoc
"Why bring dividing politics to this blog Adam? Why? I get enough of it everywhere else. I don’t want it on the sports blogs I read." - tasan

by Longhorn on Oct 10, 2008 9:20 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You think the Democrats caused this...

when their Congress didn’t get sworn in until early last year?

by Black Francis on Oct 10, 2008 9:46 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mess

And you think all of the conditions that are causing this mess are from the last 8 years? They go back way farther than that.

by Jack Nicholson 1974 on Oct 10, 2008 9:49 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Did I say that?

You know, I don’t think I did.

by Black Francis on Oct 10, 2008 9:52 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm mildly confident that inflation won't be a problem

Maybe I’m overly so, but I think that the nation learned enough from the 1970s to never allow that to happen again. Its going to hurt, but those with cash are in good shape.

In the long run, I believe the best strategy is to start buying good companies outside of financial exposures now. That means companies with lots of cash and in industries that aren’t completely affected by the economy. obviously everyone is to some extent – but any stock you can buy now that you know won’t go out of business in the next two years is probably a good buy.

by JBImaknee on Oct 10, 2008 9:42 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

nothing they can do

they have to print their way out, inflation is coming, hopefully not of the stag variety, but I think that’s likely

by thedudeabides on Oct 10, 2008 11:33 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yep

time for everyone to familiarize themselves with the old Weimar Republic.

by SteveP on Oct 10, 2008 11:36 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I doubt it

The DOW could lose 4000 more points, and Bush will still be remembered better than Carter economically if there aren’t gas lines, 20% mortgage rates, and 10% inflation on common household goods. Bush isn’t going to hyper-inflate the dollar in his last year of office.

Obama won’t do it either when he gets in office. The problem with printing money to solve these problems is that it is a regressive tax on the entire population. This is pretty clear economically, and I don’t think Obama will allow the common every-man to suffer while people with significant cash can hedge their money in inflation-resistant assets like gold, stocks, etc.

The big advantage that we have – unlike everyone else in the world – is that our government is not fundamentally tied to the banks. We have a system in place to insure deposits and regulate our currency, which the EU does not with the Euro. The big advantage to the government not “owning” stock in banks is that when they fail, the government is not explicitly responsible, like it is in Iceland. Our exposure to Fannie and Freddie is large, but nothing on the scale that some of those European countries are looking at.

If anything, I predict the dollar will continue to grow in strength in this time.

by JBImaknee on Oct 10, 2008 11:58 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

um

would you like to amend your statement?

by SteveP on Oct 10, 2008 6:41 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

One other thing

“2000 seems so long ago”

Remember, that was right at the peak of a tech bubble that was ridiculous and led to a collapse of many companies and lots investors trillions. Corporate greed and transparency was just as bad then – remember World Com and my former employer Enron?

The market problems today are due to a poor response to the last bubble pop / corporate unraveling of 7-8 years ago- lessons weren’t learned (Citigroup is a common player in both crises), the wrong problems were fixed (mark-to-market rules were changed to an equally bad opposite standard), and transparency in business never arrived.

Its hard to only blame Bush when the first wave of this started with tech and Enron during the Clinton years. But Bush did have an opportunity (and the mandate) to fix it, which he failed to do.

by JBImaknee on Oct 10, 2008 10:19 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Transparency

Malcolm Gladwell of the New Yorker wrote a really intriguing piece about the Enron collapse. I’m over-simplifying here, but he premise is basically that SEC reporting requirements (which are supposed to help provide transparency) aided Enron corruption. He’s basically saying that only the most astute financial experts could have uncovered how Enron was running its business because the reporting requirements are too onerous.

Eventually, the unraveling of Enron was created when a very astute investor realized what they were doing started short selling and others saw this astute investor short selling and jumped on the bandwagon.

To your point, the changes that were made to the reporting requirements may have only made the matter worse by making the reporting requirements even more difficult to follow instead of implementing rules that would have made reporting requirements less cumbersome.

I probably did a very poor job of summarizing. Here’s a link for those who like this type of thing:

http://www.malcolmgladwell.com/2007/2007_01_08_a_secrets.html

by robert_d_wilfong on Oct 10, 2008 10:41 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

my 401K

is about 3 years old. it went from a high of about 8,100 to it’s current shiny 6,920.68 for a 14.37% loss on the year (8.44 on the quarter), despite my contributions of nearly 2 grand on the year, that 14.37% loss should actually be higher. wonder what it would be if i didn’t have 26% in guaranteed investments. glad i’m only 26 because i’m pretty sure in a few years it’ll be back to where it was, plus some after buying stocks cheaply right now….i hope. unless i lose my job before then, then i’m at a straight up loss.

i’m depressed now.

http://www.buchanan4pres2008.org/
NIXON: NOW MORE THAN EVER

by gossamer on Oct 10, 2008 9:52 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We're getting ready

to send some more money to our IRA, seems like a good time to buy.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 10, 2008 9:30 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have some money saved up

from being a spendthrift these last few years. I’m just waiting for it to bottom out.

by FirebatM3 on Oct 10, 2008 9:39 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think the panic stage

will end soon, then the market will probable fluctuate in the 8-10,000 range for a year or two before moving up again. Like I know anything.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 10, 2008 9:57 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oil under $80 and dropping

Could drop below $70 by the end of the month. That combined with cheaper winter mixes could push gas to around $2 by the holidays.

by robert_d_wilfong on Oct 10, 2008 9:39 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

makes me feel like a kid again.

"Anyone that isn't pro-choice never met you" ~Brian Thomas on Seth...

by ivysafety39 on Oct 10, 2008 10:36 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the good ol days

The bloggerformelyknownasBigBaddBubbaJ

by NYTXFAN on Oct 10, 2008 2:36 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wonder...

how much of this is related to the likelihood of an Obama presidency with significant gains for the Dems in the house and senate? The subprime mess they got us into may be only half the mess when they get to decide the “solution.” The market seems to realize this and is pricing in its future expectations accordingly.

by Jack Nicholson 1974 on Oct 10, 2008 9:45 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think

Liberals strangling our energy supply is a major factor as well.

Take the 13 coal plants (each employing 1k people in good jobs) TXU was going to build in Texas, and liberals denied with lawsuits, etc. Now, electric bills in Texas are sky high as a direct result, and we will be facing rolling blackouts soon, which Cahill will blame on Republicans.

Theres no way to build any kind of power plant anywhere in America today because of liberals, period. Any plant would require thousands of permits and liberals absolutely will not allow it. They control America. Everybody is expecting more regulations as well, it’s simply not feasible.

I’m sure this post will be decried, but give me info on any new power plant of any kind in America?

Liberals wont let you do nuclear either. Even though it’s clean.

Its clear what their goal is.

by Sharky on Oct 10, 2008 9:53 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In fairness

I agree with you up to your last sentence. I don’t think the vast majority of liberals have an intention to harm America. Each side (conservative/liberal) has a fringe element that desires to hurt America. I think the liberals fail out of ignorance of the unintended consequences of their good intentions. In the example you used, they think they are helping the environment but are instead harming everything else. Same with the subprime mess: they thought they were helping the poor get houses – what resulted is a financial crisis. I don’t think they mean to do it – they just can’t look at their actions and consequences in a clear, dispassionate way.

by Jack Nicholson 1974 on Oct 10, 2008 10:05 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Good God

Subprime was not caused by Democrats, okay? This is clearly established. Yes some of the first legislation that got the ball rolling was signed into law by Clinton. After that, though, was deregulation that enabled the finance giants to come up with these weird derivatives and such that had nobody — not even the people who were trading them — could understand. And it’s not just “poor people” who were getting these loans. It was people who were making good incomes who wanted a house that fit someone with a great income. It was people with great incomes wanting houses that fit people with wealth. Everybody was being told you can’t lose money in real estate. The banks and the consumers bought in hook, line and sinker. When home values began to drop and the ARM’s became more expensive, people began having trouble and mortgage backed securities were no longer worth as much. People on Wall Street should have known a bubble when they saw one. I spent most of my last five years as a lowly real estate agent (I didn’t buy and sell houses — the license was necessary for my job, though) and, hell, I knew a bubble when I saw it. In Austin there were 4 bedroom bungalows selling for nearly a million dollars. Did anyone think that was sustainable??? No. And it was much worse in San Diego, LA, Las Vegas, and other places.

The markets just went nuts, and deregulation allowed them to go really, really nuts. There’s a much better over-simplified explanation for you.

by Black Francis on Oct 10, 2008 10:21 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Funny

It’s funny that you can characterize your position on a debateable point as “clearly established” in hopes of sweeping the entire point of the conversion under the rug. (I can do it too: It is clearly established that Communism is a better system of government for advancing social and economic well-being. Just look at China’s financial strength and the literacy and education marks of Cuba compared to the rest of Latin America. See how I made it seem that a nonsensical point is “clearly established” by supporting it with only one side of the debate?)
The fact is that 6 years ago, Republicans held hearings and fought for tougher regulation of Fannie and Freddie. They failed b/c of Democrat resistance. They should’ve fought harder. And yes, a lot of what is going on now is tied to the easy money people got for mortgages and the resulting real estate bubble. If Republicans de-regulated and aided Fannie/Freddie, why are Dodd, Obama, Kerry, et al. the top recipients of Fannie money? On both counts (subprime loans and deregulation) Dems are 100% to blame.

by Jack Nicholson 1974 on Oct 10, 2008 11:14 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Apparently,

most of the USA doesn’t agree with you. Only backward areas will vote for McCain. It is the Dawn of a New Era. The Republicans will be swept out of Congress and the Whitehouse. So, go cry in your beer…

by SanDiegoKev on Oct 10, 2008 11:17 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Really

The Republicans couldn’t get changes when they had the house, the senate, and the Presidency? Those mean, mean democrats.

“The Buck Stops Here” – Harry S. Truman
“Wah Wah Wah, It’s not our fault, its not our fault, even though we were in charge”- Modern Republicans.

"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky

by DJCahill on Oct 10, 2008 11:19 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Kev and DJ

Not at all shocking that neither of you could form a substantive retort. Instead, you each went to a form of name calling.
To be clear, this is not a Republican/Democrat issue, it is a conervative/liberal issue. Liberals and liberalism wet the bed here. Unfortunately, even when Republicans are in charge, there aren’t enough conservatives to win the day. Washington ruins all but the best of men. That is why so many of us want Washington out of our lives. Everything they touch they break.

by Jack Nicholson 1974 on Oct 10, 2008 11:27 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Ridiculous

There is plenty of blame to go around for both parties, and to the voters (and overly enthusiastic consumers) that put them in office. I am sick and tired of people trying to lay blame for this on either party. Utterly ridiculous.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 10, 2008 11:36 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Freedom

1)Freedom to start stupid no-account wars and drain the American Economy.

2)Freedom to destroy American Industry and allow China to own our manfacturing. Has anyone found any American Goods in Macy’s lately?

3)Freedom to support and send lots of money we don’t have to no-account countries like Georgia, and start World War 3. Sure Conservatives want to suround Russia with Nato countries and see what happens.

3) Freedom to do away with all regulation, so the Greedy can destroy this country.

Conservatives are all about Freedom alright.

by SanDiegoKev on Oct 10, 2008 11:42 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can't let Republicans off the hook

The problem is that Tom DeLay and his cronies forced out the Newt Gingrich / Dick Armey class of Republicans and treated Washington like their own private get rich quick scheme. Coupled with Bush and Bill Frist (the worst Senate Majority Leader I can remember), the Republican congress of the 2000’s was not at all interested in stopping a growing problem that was helping line their pockets with gold.

So yeah – real conservatives may have seen what was going on and may have been able to stop it. But the guys with®‘s after their names were too preoccupied with stealing our money by padding their accounts than fixing any problems. You can’t just blame the Democrats on this one. Heck, at least the hard core left was honorably trying to help their causes.

by JBImaknee on Oct 10, 2008 11:48 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

What utter bull.

It’s all the fault of the “liberals”? The country as a whole has been in an extended “conservative” phase. The pendulum has only now started swinging back. Liberals haven’t had the strength to screw anything up for the better part of two decades. That’s why the use of the “liberal” tag-line is failing miserably for McCain in this election.

by Athos on Oct 10, 2008 2:55 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Why bother with a substantive retort

to someone that says “On both counts (subprime loans and deregulation) Dems are 100% to blame.”

Congress was Republican controlled during the period in question.

 From Jan 2001 to present, a Republican President has been in the White House.

From ’94 to ’06 the Republicans were in charge of Congress.

You seem to be unaware of these basic facts. Which isn’t too surprising given the extremely weak grasp of the facts a lot of folks who are Republicans have. Then again, if Republicans actually knew many facts, they would tar and feather some folks in their own party, who have made Big Government one of the pillars of their legislative agenda.

"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky

by DJCahill on Oct 11, 2008 6:29 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

In a $1TRILLION+ crisis

there is enough blame to go around 2 or 3 times.

http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/who_caused_the_economic_crisis.html

Nolan Ryan should be the Rangers president, GM, manager and pitching coach.

by RangerMad on Oct 11, 2008 10:13 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

100% to blame?

You have got to be kidding me. Yes, I think it’s CLEARLY ESTABLISHED that the Democratic Party and its members are not 100% to blame for this crisis. I’m a Democrat and wouldn’t even venture out so far as to say Republicans are 100 percent to blame. You’re not worth arguing with.

by Black Francis on Oct 10, 2008 12:48 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I betcha

That may account for, oh, lets say .05% of the losses.

by Black Francis on Oct 10, 2008 10:00 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Except

the Stock market has done better under Dems than under Republicans since WW2. An Obama presidency is likely better for the stock Market than a McCain presidency.

George W. Bush will likely be the first president since the War to have the Dow lose ground rather than gain ground under their presidency.

"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky

by DJCahill on Oct 10, 2008 10:26 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You're being truly naive

if you believe:

1) This whole economic mess was created exclusively by the subprime mortgage market
2) All Republicans are free of fault in the Freddie/Fannie failures
3) The market is preparing for an Obama presidency by selling off

by robert_d_wilfong on Oct 10, 2008 10:26 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

We the people

are getting off too easy in this. No politician will say it, but ordinary people living beyond their means are a big part of the problem. No one was forced to take out a mortgage, buy more car than they should, or ring up credit card debt. Government has been making debt too easy to take on for many, many years, but consumers are all too ready to gobble it up.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 10, 2008 10:34 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Absolutely,

heavily indebted folks deserve a lot of the blame.

On the other hand, so did the business that lent to them. Whether you are talking about Bill Heard, or Ameriquest, or any of the other companies who were shoveling out the debt. The system was awash in low interest money, and companies felt they could lend at high enough rates to the non creditworthy to make a buck. The guys writing the subprime stuff weren’t doing it because the government was forcing them to at gun point. They were doing it because they thought that if they charged high enough rates, and could borrow the money cheaply enough, they could make a buck.

Personally, I’ve always felt we needed to end deductions for interest paid. I don’t think we should encourage a debtor nation.

"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky

by DJCahill on Oct 10, 2008 10:55 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's very true

I think we’re going to see a lot of reform come out of this both on the personal level and by the government. Most of our grandparents were children of the Depression, and I’d venture to say that most of them were enormous tightwads because of those formative experiences. I don’t think people have to go as far as my grandparents in particular did (they wouldn’t finance anything. They paid cash for their house, even), but they may consider heading in that direction. I grew up on the poor side — broken home and all that — and I’m much more frugal than most people. I have zero credit card debt. I did finance my car but put an enormous down payment on it. I don’t buy a lot of shit I don’t need and while I could have purchased a home over the last few years (lots of people advised me to), I knew that it would be better to rent until prices came back down to Earth. As a result, I’m not too worried about the future as long as my business remains solvent (which is a pretty big question but I think I’ll survive).

On the government’s part I think there needs to be credit card reform. Some of the things they do are totally unreasonable and they are part of why people can’t pay their mortgage payments. When I was in college with no income, I had a ton of credit cards with limits up to $10k each. Something smells fishy, you know?

But when it comes to housing, people don’t know shit about buying a house. Their brokers were pressuring them to buy and were saying there’s no way they could lose money on it. “God’s not making any more of it”, etcetera. While people should be smarter than that, they’re not and were getting bad advice. Some people just have no business buying a home in any shape or form. This is perfectly acceptable in NYC, where a lot of people rent for their whole life. In other places, though (like here), you’re nobody if you don’t own a house. Put all of that together with the loans that were being offered, and it’s no wonder why all this went down the way it did.

by Black Francis on Oct 10, 2008 10:56 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Personal reform

I think there’s already some of that and there will be more. We have both of our cars paid off, and are about to finish paying off my student loans, carry no credit card debt and have a plan to pay off the house we just bought in 10 years. My wife is obsessive about our budget and I love her for it.

Lots of banks and brokers took advantage of people not really understanding these exotic mortgages and the nature of risk and real estate markets. They assured folks they had nothing to worry about, and too many people filled themselves with wishful thinking and bought it hook, line, and sinker.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 10, 2008 11:07 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Frugality is the new black.

"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer

by ghtd36 on Oct 10, 2008 11:38 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Lehman

got nearly 10 cents on the dollar for their CDS crap. More than I expected.

by SteveP on Oct 10, 2008 10:55 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Really?

At the end of the day, what is underlying the CDSs are bonds secured by mortgages. Unless you expect 90% of the homeowners whose mortgages underlie the securities to default, and expect the homes which underlie the mortgages to be worthless when they are foreclosed upon, you should be able to get more than 10 cents on the dollar.

The intrinsic value of the assets underlying the securities are worth more than 10 cents on the dollar. It is just that no one knows if they are worth 70 cents or 98 cents on the dollar, and thus no one will buy them, driving prices down farther, which makes no one with reserve requirements want to buy them because of the mark-to-market requirements which would mean the entity has to have them on the books at a value well below the intrinsic value.

I’m surprised that a Warren Buffett or a George Soros (or a Microsoft, for that matter) doesn’t pay $10 billion for $20 billion (face value) worth of mortgage securities, and just sit back and collect the payments until either the market returns or the mortgages are ultimately paid off.

by Adam J. Morris on Oct 10, 2008 11:04 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

That's an interesting point.
I’m surprised that a Warren Buffett or a George Soros (or a Microsoft, for that matter) doesn’t pay $10 billion for $20 billion (face value) worth of mortgage securities, and just sit back and collect the payments until either the market returns or the mortgages are ultimately paid off.

I guess I never thought of that. A private investor with the means (and that is a very, very, very few) could not only help out the economy, but could even make a nice buck.

"One man, five scoops." -- shroomer

by ghtd36 on Oct 10, 2008 11:41 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I don't think even Buffet or Soros have the money necessary

But there are huge sovereign wealth funds sitting in UAE, Saudi, Brunei, etc who are the exact type of investors who would typically want to buy these vehicles. Unlike a Microsoft or Google, which may have hordes of cash but also shareholders, they don’t really answer to anyone and would very much like to hold some of those big assets. They can afford to buy them at a fair discount (60-80% face value) and hold onto them until they are fully paid off.

Given that many of these nations have a vested interest in not seeing the global economy crash to a halt (that is, oil production), the question is – why haven’t they done it yet? When OPEC meets next month, they will be debating whether to decrease supply – that will only slow the economy down more. They should be saving their golden-egg laying goose.

Which makes me think that something else is really wrong here – otherwise they would have stepped in.

by JBImaknee on Oct 10, 2008 12:10 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the capital required

to adequately insure against loss isn’t peanuts, especially since so many financial entities are loaded with this crap already. there’s a big difference if the underlying assets are worth 70 cents vs 98 cents. it’s basically leverage.

by SteveP on Oct 10, 2008 11:21 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Sorry

You are talking about the credit default swaps. I thought you meant the collaterized debt obligations.

Yeah, the credit default swaps are a mess, and this is a perfect example of why the insurance industry is as closely regulated as it is…

by Adam J. Morris on Oct 10, 2008 11:37 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

which is why we call it a swap, not insurance...

"Anyone that isn't pro-choice never met you" ~Brian Thomas on Seth...

by ivysafety39 on Oct 10, 2008 4:59 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

yep...

…gets us out of having to deal with rules like liquidity and balance sheets… instead of setting the needed assets to pay the coverage off to the side we can leverage them out as well… makes sense to all those guys at Lehman… and they’re pretty smart… were pretty smart i guess is more accurate.

"Anyone that isn't pro-choice never met you" ~Brian Thomas on Seth...

by ivysafety39 on Oct 11, 2008 8:54 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

High School Educations

I personally believe that not enough is done in school to prepare people for the real world. High school graduates are barely taught how to think, and within months of graduation (sometimes even beforehand) are expected to make decisions about voting and credit.

I have no idea how to fit these into schools, but I think it’s necessary for a nation like ours to require (1) more courses on our governmental structure, history and philosophy/idealism, (2) more courses on credit, investing, mortgages, and taxes.

It doesn’t matter how good you are at math or how well you write, these are basic elements of every day life in the United States, and only a very, very small percentage of Americans are acceptably educated.

Instead of improving education, we’re lowering standards. Not only are we not teaching them about the real world, we’re not even requiring the same standards as in the past.

I guess what I’m trying to say is that I 100% believe that the American public is responsible for this problem. The lenders, the borrowers, and the government. Better education usually leads to better decisions.

My brother is a pretty perfect example of this. He was generally uneducated on taxes, credit, and money management. His situation has nothing to do with the current crisis, but the sub-prime lending fiasco almost made it worse – to the tune of a $400K no-doc mortgage.

I’ve lost my place and my interest in this topic… I hope I actually made a point here.

It's filed under 'D'... for donut.

by NoNameOnCard on Oct 12, 2008 2:53 PM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Parenting

Along with not enough in high school, not nearly enough is being done by most parents to educate their kids on some basic budgeting principles.

As for the schools, the constant emphasis on testing and measurable results is giving us kids who don’t know how to think. No Child Left Untested is yet another stupid idea. And whatever happened to local control of schools? Why all of a sudden is the Federal govt. so heavily involved in schools? And this is from the party that claims that government is too big?

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 12, 2008 5:31 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Parents can't teach it if they don't know it

I agree with NoName … there should be some life coping courses within the high school curriculum.

by robert_d_wilfong on Oct 12, 2008 7:35 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If your parents are anything like mine

…you’re glad they didn’t teach you money management. We were poor (due to divorce and stuff like that) for years and years, and sometime while I was in the early years of high school my mom finally started making a good salary. Within a few years she was filing bankruptcy. Nowadays he’s nearing retirement and has nothing saved. Debt all over the place. Who’s going to pay for her retirement? Me.

She wants me to have kids (you know how parents are) and finally I just told her last weekend and said I’m already going to have one. I got a weird look and told her that about two years after her retirement I’ll be paying for everything she needs. Boy she was pissed, but it’s true.

What I don’t understand is how someone who makes $80k a year with full benefits and her kid moved away from home while she was still bankrupt and never paid a penny of college has no money saved for retirement. She paid off her house three years ago and now has money owed against it again. A brand new car she paid $40k for. Credit cards nearly maxed out.

As smart as my mother is, she learned nothing from her parents regarding money. My real father grew up under very, very similar circumstances and is in the same situation but for different reasons. Luckily he married into a family with money and I probably won’t have to support him, although I’ll “inherit” a viable but debt-ridden business when he decides to retire.

I know a lot of parents are better about this sort of thing. I would venture to guess that most of these sub-prime mortgages were signed by Gen-Xers. But certainly not all. Keep in mind our parents’ generation (I think you’re about the same age I am) are the ones who put this country into debt. So, yeah, I would argue that it should be taught in schools. I understand it is taught in some of the schools around here now, but it should be a part of every district’s curriculum. When I was in high school we had economics class and that was a huge waste of time. That seems like it could be replaced by personal finance and ECON could be taken up in college.

by Black Francis on Oct 12, 2008 7:39 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yikes

I’m 39, but my dad is 74 and scrimped carefully to save for retirement while working 2 jobs. I look bad in awe and wonder at the things he did as a single parent for us. I am thrilled to death for him that he is now fully retired and enjoying himself. After much arm twisting from all of his kids, he finally did something for himself and bought an old Alfa Romeo in decent shape.

We were poor when I grew up, but I don’t remember not having anything I really needed. My mother was a disaster in many ways, but she could balance her checkbook.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 12, 2008 10:42 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

the people who schemed up the

over the counter credit derivatives are some of the most educated geeks in our country. their academic credentials were only matched by their greed.

by SteveP on Oct 12, 2008 10:40 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Education != Intelligence

Greed is a factor, but most of these geniuses are holding stocks just like the majority of 401(k) and IRA holders. If they really knew what was going on, they’d have prepared for this as an inevitable consequence of their actions.

The SEC would have been all over that, and this thing would have exploded a couple of years ago instead of now, when things finally started to fall apart.

It's filed under 'D'... for donut.

by NoNameOnCard on Oct 13, 2008 1:16 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Emotion trumps intelligence, logic, etc.

No matter how smart, educated someone is you can get caught up in this stuff and convince yourself everything will be fine. Lots of otherwise smart people took out mortgages they couldn’t really afford, along with these yahoos who pushed them. For many buying a home is as much an emotional decision as a financial one, and it’s easy to let your dreams rule your brain.

We did a lot of looking before we bought a new home built for us. I was continually amazed at how smartly they would stage these models and talk to you in terms of your deepest desires for a good home and family life. The whole system was rigged against making intelligent decisions. Luckily, we got a home to make both our hearts and our budget pretty happy.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Oct 13, 2008 10:02 AM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

It was the poor and the minorities fault!

Fannie & Freddie where forced to make more subprime loans!—-laughable. The rich white redneck rich white conservative has been shouting this from the rooftops, exposing their ignorance to anyone who knows how this went down.

Read this please:

Push for affordable housing unfairly blamed for financial crisis

"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2

by Rodney on Oct 13, 2008 10:57 AM CDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Try not to confuse

modern Republicans with facts. The majority of them are from the Sarah Palin school of conservatism.

"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky

by DJCahill on Oct 13, 2008 12:27 PM CDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

477845_small
July 1st, 2009: A Texas Rangers Memory
Wmplayer_2009-05-18_23-29-11-64_small
David Brown/Spurdynasty on Fastball Velocity and Pitching Performance
Martin_perez__8_small
July 2 Thread
Small
Julio Borbon called up
Small
Going Bill James on Josey’s Great Game

Recent FanPosts

Small
Minors - 7/5
Small
Help with video feed.
Small
Minors 7/4
340x_small
Baserunning: Why have we lost runs due to this?
Small
What moves need to be made.............
Small
Ranger's Snag Sardinas
Small
Frank Francisco's Entrance Song
Martin_perez__8_small
Minors 7/3
Ea_small
Redhawk Notes
Joshhamiltonfunnypic_small
2009 Texas League All-Star Game Photos

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports