Normandin on the AL West
http://www.baseballprospectus.com/article.php?articleid=8305
What Do They Need? Losing Milton Bradley hurts, but they should still have one of the best lineups in the game even without him; if Nelson Cruz finally turns into a major league-caliber hitter, then they are all set on the offensive side of things. They need players who can field, but most of the top free-agent position players are not known for their gloves, just their bats. The changes will have to come in the rotation, where Vicente Padilla (5.76 ERA, 1.7 SNLVAR in 2008) may be their best current option. To help on that front, Eric Hurley should be back for the start of the season, and they hope Kason Gabbard's elbow injuries are a thing of the past. But even with those two around, they need more pitching; they're just stopgaps right now, not answers, which means GM Jon Daniels has work to do.
What Do They Have? Though Bradley is a free agent, this is still a lineup that can smack the ball around: David Murphy and Cruz are two solid options for the corners, especially with superstar Josh Hamilton in center. Michael Young and Ian Kinsler make up one of the better offensive middle infields in the game. Chris Davis showed promise during his first year in the majors, and will man first base. Hank Blalock was moved off of third permanently, but helps to fix the lineup's one glaring issue, the DH spot. Marlon Byrd is a useful supporting piece in the outfield, especially if Cruz slips up or develops slowly. They also have four catchers and/or catching prospects capable of starting on most teams. On the pitching side of things, the Rangers have nothing. They had the worst rotation in the majors last year—they were nearly 25 full wins behind the first-place Blue Jays in the SNLVAR rankings, and there were 51 starting pitchers who individually produced more than the entire Ranger rotation. The bullpen is in much better shape, with Frank Francisco and C.J. Wilson, but they do not have the depth to make up for the rotation's inadequacies.
What Are They Likely To Do? The Rangers have already publicly commented on the fact that they think long-term, expensive contracts to pitchers are the worst risk in baseball, and something they will not invest in. That means they are going to miss out on the high-profile starting pitchers who can pick up both dollars and years, and instead focus on veterans on their way out (such as Kenny Rogers, a former Ranger) or retreads trying to come back from injury or ineffectiveness (Jason Jennings, Mark Mulder, or Bartolo Colon, perhaps?). If they decide against any of those options, they are going to once again try to go at it with in-house solutions, with familiar results.
What Should They Do? They play in one of the most hitter-friendly venues in existence, but that does not mean they should skimp on starting pitching entirely. Yes, long-term contracts with lots of dollar signs are risky, but the Rangers are not going to go anywhere if they fail to take risks. They should give lots of money to the right starting pitcher, in order to balance reward versus risk properly, and give themselves a fighting chance in the division. A.J. Burnett strikes out hitters and keeps the ball on the ground more often than in the air, and he does not walk a ton of hitters; that's the kind of guy they need to anchor their staff, not some pitcher who, along with Kevin Millwood, would make this staff look great if it were 1999.
0 recs |
85 comments
Comments
WTF?
If we sign some combo of Jennings, Mulder, Colon, or Rogers, I would be pissed. It seems that this off-season, given the plethora of major league ready young starters (Feldman, Hurley, McCarthy, Harrison, Hunter, Nippert, etc) the last thing we need to do is sign a washed up pitcher near retirement.
The only pitcher we should be considering is one capable of being a top of the rotation starter (Sheets?), or a young starter capable of being with this team for a long time (Sonnanstine, Buchholz, Masterson, Nolasco?). Allocating a rotation spot to, say, Kenny Rogers over Scott Feldman would be absolutely ridiculous.
Oh and not to be picky, but Padilla had an ERA of 4.74, not 5.76. Kinda a big difference. Sure, it appears he was lucky in 2008 and wasn’t as good as his ERA indicated, but still.
ANDY. SONNANSTINE.
by Stephen Rushin on Nov 13, 2008 7:57 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I am fairly sure Jennigs gets atleast an offer from Texas
Very incentive based, but never the less, a deal
by laxtonto on Nov 13, 2008 8:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think so
Between Hurley, Feldman, McCarthy, and Harrison… We don’t need a Jennings.
by tyd3311 on Nov 13, 2008 8:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If its anything more
than an NRI, I’d be pissed.
Nolan Ryan is the Greatest Pitcher ever, because Google says so.
"BTW I’m officially welching ab03. Yeah I planned too all along, but I figured I’d try to get off the hook with double or nothing first."- Sharky
by DJCahill on Nov 14, 2008 6:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Burnett
I didn’t realize he’d been so consistent with those groundball rates, and had kept up his K rate.
He’ll certainly cost less than Sabathia.
That would make a great ad hoc FA addition, even at 4 years…wouldn’t shock me if JD put a sneak attack on that player.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Nov 13, 2008 7:59 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
K rates
Getting slightly better.
by brettgardner on Nov 13, 2008 8:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I just came here to post this.
Because I don’t like his prescription.
by philkid3 on Nov 13, 2008 8:11 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
4yrs/54 mil is reasonable for burnnett;
he’s injury prone but i’d still take a gamble on him.
by Aneel on Nov 13, 2008 8:35 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I'd rather give that contract
to Sheets
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Nov 13, 2008 8:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i wouldn't.
Burnett seems to be getting better and he has worked with Halladay constantly to improve his game, he’ll probably end up being a better pick up than Sheets.
by Save us on Nov 13, 2008 11:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Care to back that up?
What makes it “probable” that Burnett will be better than Sheets?
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Nov 14, 2008 7:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
whats the point of trying to convince you?
by Save us on Nov 14, 2008 3:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm interested
I can be swayed if you can actually present a coherent argumetn.
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Nov 14, 2008 5:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
lol
argument
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Nov 14, 2008 5:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not a strong suit of his.
"Anyone that isn't pro-choice never met you" ~Brian Thomas on Seth...
by ivysafety39 on Nov 14, 2008 6:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
seeing as how padilla and possibly milly get off the payroll at the end of next season
JD should really consider bringing in a top starter from this year’s market.
by Aneel on Nov 13, 2008 8:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Hey: you guys wanna see the definition of BEAST??
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6M9dBsUhyo
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 13, 2008 11:01 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
So he's a beast
because he wants to put people convicted of assault and rape to death? Yeah, that’s a beast alright. I don’t get how “Right-to-lifers” can be pro death penalty. It’s not ok to play God except when it is. Right.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Nov 14, 2008 12:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The entired CJ system needs to be looked at
Not just the capital punishment aspect of it. If some vice crimes were legalized, there would be plenty of room in prisons to let these sort of people rot for life. It’s a valid point that you bring up about “Right-to-lifers” generally being more accepting of the expansion of crimes eligible for capital punishment.
by hiafex on Nov 14, 2008 2:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so people
just run everywhere and do whatever they want because who are we to judge. right. look, you obviously have no clue as to how the Biblical Christian world-view works.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 7:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
here we go...
lets notmake this into one of those arguements… besides, separation of church and state and all that…
"Anyone that isn't pro-choice never met you" ~Brian Thomas on Seth...
by ivysafety39 on Nov 14, 2008 8:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I've worked in a church for 20 years
I’m well acquainted with the Christian world-view, my young know-it-all friend. Prison is just slightly different from taking someone’s life, would you not agree?
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Nov 14, 2008 10:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
first off
I said Biblical Christian world-view, not Christian, that’s too broad. Do you believe the whole Bible to be completely true and without error in the original translation? That’s what I thought.
Secondly, if prison is “just slightly different”, then why not kill them and save the tax dollars and prison crowding? But most importantly, the death penalty saves lives. The death penalty lowers murder rates.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 2:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Biblical Christian "World-View"
dstar442005 – Would you support the governments abolition of the death penalty? As Romans 13:1-7 says, those in power have been given that authority only by God, and we must respect and obey the laws of that authority, so long as they are not against the laws of God. So, would you support the abolition of the death penalty if that is what the government mandated?
"Well, I say to them tonight, there is not a liberal America and a conservative America -- there is the United States of America."
by sunlegend54 on Nov 14, 2008 3:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Death Penalty Lowers Murder Rates
also, you’re completely wrong on that fact:
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/node/657
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/deterrence-states-without-death-penalty-have-had-consistently-lower-murder-rates
"Well, I say to them tonight, there is not a liberal America and a conservative America -- there is the United States of America."
by sunlegend54 on Nov 14, 2008 3:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don't try to confuse
conservatives with inconvenient facts. They like to believe their worldview is correct, regardless of what any actual facts might say.
Nolan Ryan is the Greatest Pitcher ever, because Google says so.
"BTW I’m officially welching ab03. Yeah I planned too all along, but I figured I’d try to get off the hook with double or nothing first."- Sharky
by DJCahill on Nov 14, 2008 4:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
do you
prefer that socialist flavor instead. Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 5:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
those
are skewed stats.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 5:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I may have to IP ban you today
while Adam is gone.
by Brett Perryman on Nov 14, 2008 4:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Do it!
And hit save us while you’re at it.
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
by Rodney on Nov 14, 2008 4:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't post very often,
but is he talking about banning dstar442005 or me? i apologize if i over stepped, i was just trying to see where he stood on the issue.
Don't bring opinions to a fact check debate.
by sunlegend54 on Nov 14, 2008 4:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't post very often,
but when I do, I prefer death penalty posts.
Get it? :)
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
by Rodney on Nov 14, 2008 4:48 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
Don't bring opinions to a fact check debate.
by sunlegend54 on Nov 14, 2008 4:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL.
those ad guys are genius.
"Anyone that isn't pro-choice never met you" ~Brian Thomas on Seth...
by ivysafety39 on Nov 14, 2008 6:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
for expressing my opinion??
I ain’t a troll… I talk about the Rangers more than politics.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 5:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Come on!
Throw up another trade diary.
lol
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
by Rodney on Nov 14, 2008 6:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i never
start trade diaries.
i did leave trade comments, but am now taking a break from that. Thanks Z!
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 6:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For starting
a stupid political argument in a non-politics thread.
by Brett Perryman on Nov 14, 2008 6:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
there
are no politics threads going. And I was just posting a random video, like y’all do all the time.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 6:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
"Y'all"
don’t post sociopolitical videos that are guaranteed to bring about an argument in a nonpolitics thread because literally 99% of the posters (including all of those awful, immoral liberals) have respected Adam’s request to keep that talk in those threads, unlike you here.
It was still less annoying than your awful trade suggestions though, I"ll give you that.
by Brett Perryman on Nov 14, 2008 7:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ok
I’ll try not to do it again.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 9:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not that I fit into that category exactly...
…but I think the reasoning goes: Save the “people” who have done nothing wrong (or right), kill the people who have done something wrong.
There doesn’t seem to be a very fine line to have to walk between “baby who has done nothing” and “killer found guilty by a jury”.
by GhettoBear04 on Nov 14, 2008 8:25 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
but I still think it’s playing God to put someone to death instead of sending them to prison. The only time it’s ok to kill someone in my book is when your life is in imminent danger. I have no trouble with killing in war or defending your life or those of your family members during a robbery or something. But to sit in a court of law and say “you do not deserve to live, and even though we already have you in custody and we could send you to prison for life, we’re going to kill you” is playing God.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Nov 14, 2008 10:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Jindal
- Accepted to Harvard Medical School.
- Opposes stem-cell research.
On the face of it, the guy disturbs me.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Nov 14, 2008 6:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
why?
because he’s actually super-smart and a Reagan coalition conservative Are all smart people supposed to be libs?
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 7:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Probably because...
…he opposes stem cell research.
I don’t understand the opposition to it. It would be one thing if all of these embryos were being implanted and thus had a chance at becoming a fetus. But more embryos are made than will be used, and unless you go to great lengths to store them (and even then…), they end up being thrown away in the end.
Add into that that about 50% of embryos produced naturally never implant….I just don’t understand.
by GhettoBear04 on Nov 14, 2008 8:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He has brains apparently, and medical brains at that.
So what are his reasons for opposing stem cell research?
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Nov 14, 2008 8:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If he's anything like me
He doesn’t think the federal government or any state governments should be paying for it. Second, Stem Cells come from Embryos, some people think that’s a life and it should be defiled by medical research. I don’t agree with that but everyone’s got a right to their opinions.
by Hull Fan on Nov 14, 2008 3:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As a guy in a stem cell lab
I can understand that there are moral reasons for being against it. Its not the black/white issue that both sides make it out to be.
Personally, I have no problem with it, but given that a large percentage of the American population is against it, I can see the rationale of not using federal dollars to support it.
by JBImaknee on Nov 14, 2008 2:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
what are
the moral claims against me.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 3:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i mean against it
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 3:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
with stem cells
you’re really entering into a fuzzy moral territory of “how many lives need to be saved before its worth killing a stem cell”. If I could guarantee that I could cure Alzheimers for all society by performing research on a handful of stem cells that were going to be trashed anyway, what is the moral solution? The thing that bothers me is that many scientists actually say that very thing to get money – which is an outright lie.
Given that an embryonic stem cell is not yet a> conscious, b> self-sufficient, or c> guaranteed to ever become one of the two above, the debate gets muddled. Yes, it is “alive,” but is it “human” in a philosophical/religious sense? I don’t know – its ambiguous. I think people of faith can disagree about that.
The ironic thing is that there is (in my opinion) an ideal solution that people on both sides oppose: cloning. We can take an unfertilized egg, transfer a grown individual’s DNA into it, and develop embryonic stem cells. These cells can be used for individual-specific research as well rejection-proof transplants. Yet people hear the word “cloning” and think of armies of identical people.
by JBImaknee on Nov 14, 2008 4:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What good christians you both are
Those who would sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither.
by Brian Thomas on Nov 14, 2008 8:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm trying to figure out the relevance of stem cells here...
I mean, are they going to cure Brandon McCarthy?
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on Nov 14, 2008 6:49 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
You should ask dstar
I’m sure he had a viable reason for posting that link here.
by hiafex on Nov 14, 2008 8:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i was
too lazy to find or start a political thread.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 9:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and I was simply comparing and contrasting
the beastliness of Mccarthy and Jindal.
Bobby Jindal '12
by dstar442005 on Nov 14, 2008 9:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yay
because we haven’t gotten enough politics for the last 2 years….
by bushe on Nov 14, 2008 8:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
heh
a politician is always doing one of two things: running for office or fundraising lol
Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.
by knockoutking on Nov 14, 2008 12:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Even with Gabbard
we need more pitching? Damn.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Nov 14, 2008 12:41 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
One of the most ridiculous synopses
of the Rangers I’ve seen. I thought it was a DMN poster.
by robert_d_wilfong on Nov 14, 2008 12:42 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I wholeheartedly agree with this sentiment.
It really surprises me to read someone from BP take such a shallow glance at the organization. This guy did not do his homework. Once again, we see the return of absurd phrases like “one of the most hitter-friendly parks in existence.” I wasn’t aware we rooted for the Boston Red Sox.
by jwiscarson on Nov 14, 2008 5:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is Gabbard anything more than a
8th option? The rotation probably looks something like Millwood, Padilla, Feldman, Harrison, Hurley, McCarthy, Nippert, and then maybe Gabbard.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Nov 14, 2008 1:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would hope that Hunter is ahead of Nippert
by hiafex on Nov 14, 2008 2:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not for next years rotation
Hunter needs to spend the entire year in the minors this year unless he is absolutely dominating.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Nov 14, 2008 2:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yes, yes, again yes
Hunter can be a good guy but why rush him? Nippert has as much raw talent as any of the potential starters. If he can harness it he should be in the rotation. At worst he’s a good long guy and getting rid of him to burn up another option on Hunter makes no sense.
by Hull Fan on Nov 14, 2008 3:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hunters options
He is burning options no matter what next year. As long as a player is on the 40 man roster but not on the 25 man active roster they are “burning an option”. His options have nothing to do with whether Nippert should be ahead of him or not. Hunter was rushed this past year, partly due to necessity and part due to performance, and needs another full year in a learning/developmental environment before coming to the bigs again. Now if we need a spot starter and it falls on Hunters turn in the OKC rotation would I hesitate to bring him up for a start or two as long as he has performed well in OKC…no not at all. But thats all I want to see of him in Arlington this year. Spot starter due to injuries.
Plus Nippert is out of options so if he doesn’t make the team he will be lost to FA. Not the type of arm I want to let slip away when we could send down a harrison or Hurley to give him a shot.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Nov 14, 2008 4:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
im afraid hunter is going to be handled like salty was this year
bothneeded to play every day
Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.
by knockoutking on Nov 14, 2008 6:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What do you mean?
Do you think that Hunter is going to be a really good starter in AAA and then get brought up to the majors and be a long reliever pitching once a week or so?
I seriously doubt that would happen. We have enough long men that I don’t see us having to dip into our starting pitcher candidates to satisfy that need.
If you are referring to him being brought up before he is ready then you may have a point but again I doubt that will happen. There will be several guys that I would think would get the call to come up for any extended period of time before Hunter does. Guys like Hurley, Harrison, McCarthy, Gabbard
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Nov 14, 2008 7:01 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bringing him up this year was rushing him
I don’t see how bringing him up this year is any worse than last year. Hunter and Hurley are close in age aren’t they? And Hunter performed much better in AAA last year than Hurley did. Sorry, just stating random thoughts of mine about why I would have put him in front of Nippert. I think I have some kind of weird man-crush on him or something due to his strike throwing ability.
by hiafex on Nov 14, 2008 8:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't want to see Hutner
ahead of the other guys in the rotation mix. I would prefer to see Nippert start out in the bullpen and if he is successful there, to be given one of the first shots at a rotation spot. Hunter is a guy I would prefer to see working on his change-up in Olahoma. If/when the time comes that we need another SP, I wouldn’t be as against bringing Hunter up with him being on the 40 man roster already. I just hope we don’t have to use Hunter until he at least gets a few more months in at AAA.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Nov 15, 2008 11:28 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not much discussion of pitching prospects
You would think that our entire starting staff consisted entirely of retreads from whom no improvement could be expected or even hoped for, certainly not the case with Harrison, and that our only pitching prospect is Eric Hurley. That said, I agree that with Padilla and Millwood both coming off the team in 2010 and with Holland/Feliz still 1/2 to a full year away, adding one of Lowe/Sheets/Burnett on a 3-4 year contract would make the team more competive this year while not really preventing anyone who is ready from playing a ml role and put the team in the best possible position to seriously contend in 2010. Of course, its not my money and there is no way around the fact that this would push up salary for this year, unless Padilla or Millwood could be offloaded.
by Dalman on Nov 14, 2008 4:06 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
" David Murphy and Cruz are two solid options for the corners..."
Evidently Mr. Normandin’s definition of the word “solid” runs alittle askew from my own…
Those who would sacrifice liberty for safety deserve neither.
by Brian Thomas on Nov 14, 2008 8:14 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Marc Normandin
Is a RedSox fringer. Thus he knows who David Murphy is, and is whelmed by Nelson Cruz’ AAA and ‘08 MLB return stats. He may, although it isn’t certain, know who other Ranger OF’ers are … well of course he knows more about Texas Rangers than some “regarded analysts”. But still, he isn’t actually tuned in to the club. Here’s a go around with Jeff Sackman, for instance:
http://www.brewcrewball.com/2008/5/16/519054/5-questions-with-marc-norm
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
by Ed Coffin on Nov 14, 2008 11:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I was in a sim league
for a little while with Marc. I have to say I wasn’t exactly overwhelmed.
by Brett Perryman on Nov 15, 2008 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 

















