Should the Rangers be in on Saito?

Supposedly, the Los Angeles Dodgers are threatening to non-tender Takashi Saito, who has been one of the best relievers in the N.L. the past three years, but who missed the last couple of months of 2008 with an elbow problem.

Saito, according to the article, is looking at up to $3.5 million in arbitration, and the Dodgers don't want to offer that.  And Saito turns 39 in February, so it isn't like he's got a ton of years left.

Still...given that the team is kicking the tires on a variety of reliever options who would require a one year commitment, and given that Saito is the type of high-K power arm the Rangers seem to be seeking, wouldn't he make sense?

If the Dodgers are going to non-tender him anyway, why not offer them someone like Evan Reed or Ben Harrison, and take your chances with him in arbitration?

Is $3.5 million for Saito really that ridiculous?

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

Join Lone Star Ball

You must be a member of Lone Star Ball to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Lone Star Ball. You should read them.

Join Lone Star Ball

You must be a member of Lone Star Ball to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Lone Star Ball. You should read them.

Spinner

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9351_tracker