LSB Community Prospect Project: #27
The dream has finally come true.
After 244 votes (74 by people who don't hate freedom), Marcus Lemon has won the right to be called the LSB Community #26 prospect!.
The list so far:
1. LHP, Derek Holland
2. RHP, Neftali Feliz
3. 1b, Justin Smoak
4. RHP, Michael Main
5. SS, Elvis Andrus
6. C, Taylor Teagarden
7. C, Maximiliano Ramirez
8. LHP, Martin Perez
9. OF, Julio Borbon
10. RHP, Eric Hurley
11. OF, Engel Beltre
12. RHP, Blake Beavan
13. RHP, Wilfredo Boscan
14. RHP, Neil Ramirez
15. LHP, Kasey Kiker
16. 2b, Jose Vallejo
17. RHP, Wilmer Font
18. RHP, Omar Poveda
19. LHP, Robbie Ross
20. RHP, Tommy Hunter
21. RHP, Thomas Diamond
22. RHP, Joe Wieland
23. LHP, Tim Murphy (Tie)
23. OF, Greg Golson (Tie)
25. RHP, Warner Madrigal
26. SS, Marcus Lemon
Time to move on to the vote for #27.
The polls are open, so go ahead and vote in the poll at the bottom and feel free to make any suggestions and/or criticisms in the comments below.
And please don't hesitate to tell me you want on the list for next time.
NOTE: There has been some speculation as to what the criteria are for this vote. Should guys who have spent time in the bigs be involved in "prospect" discussions? For the sake of this exercise we're taking what the guys have done in the big leagues and using the BA prospect formula of 130 AB's or 50 ip. If a guy is under those limits, he's still a prospect and he goes on the poll. It's that simple.
Resources:
- MJH's prospect previews for the DMN Blog:
- 11 Weeks of FFG (Prelude to Prospects Lists below)
- RH Starters 1-5
- RH Starters 6-10
- RH Starters 11-15
- LH Starters 1-5
- LH Starters 6-10
- Relievers 1-5
- Catchers
- Outfielders
- Corner Infielders
- Jason Parks and Joey Matschulat's Top 25 list from their excellent Rangers' site, BBTiA.com.
197 comments
|
6 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Pedro Strop
I don’t get the “Jacque” part, but I voted for him anyways.
Don't believe the hype about sloppy seconds. They ain't bad.
Really?
Jacque sounds an awful lot like Jock
And Strop sounds an awful lot like Strap
Say Jacque Strop quickly and it sounds similar to Jock Strap
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
I once had a girl named Jacque
and she obviously pronounced it “Jackie”, so I guess that is why the "jock’ pronunciation escaped me.
Don't believe the hype about sloppy seconds. They ain't bad.
By the way
he pronounces is like it rhymes with hope, right?
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 3:50 PM CST up reply actions
Awww, damn.
I’d been calling him Strop like it rhymed with drop.
That ruins it. Jacque Strope isn’t cool at all. Well, my night is ruined.
I’ll get you for this, Z.
I really and truly will.
The 40 Trumps All!!!
There are two kinds of men in this world: Men who make jump throws, and men who wish that they were Derek Jeter so that they could make jump throws.
by thedirkatron on Dec 13, 2008 9:04 PM CST up reply actions
Hi Fidelity
That means the highest possible Fidelity.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 14, 2008 9:41 AM CST up reply actions
Lemon
Having Lemon ahead of both Gomez and Strop is an absolute embarrassment as a Ranger fan.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
I'm still waiting for an explanation
of why all the hate.
by FirebatM3 on Dec 13, 2008 2:40 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Why does it qualify
as hate to say those guys should be ahead of Lemon? How is that hateful?
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
Having Lemon ahead of both Gomez and Strop is an absolute embarrassment as a Ranger fan.
That’s pretty hateful, especially since this is a pretty damn subjective ranking.
Well okay
That’s a little extreme, I agree.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 4:00 PM CST up reply actions
Nothing against Lemon
but Strop and Gomez, and Pimentel for that matter have a much higher upside. And, when I rate a prospect, I base it on ceiling then track record if necessary.
Wait 'til the year after next
+1
This is an exciting time in my life.
The LSB CPP's are in full bloom.
by inactive lsb user on Dec 14, 2008 1:06 AM CST up reply actions
< insert hurley rant>
</hurley rant>
lol
Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.
by knockoutking on Dec 14, 2008 2:01 AM CST up reply actions
I don't think
it’s that bad. I’m more interested in these interesting pitchers, but I think we’ve had greater mistakes.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 3:51 PM CST up reply actions
No.
The 40 Trumps All!!!
There are two kinds of men in this world: Men who make jump throws, and men who wish that they were Derek Jeter so that they could make jump throws.
by thedirkatron on Dec 13, 2008 4:20 PM CST up reply actions
A real embarrassment indeed...
This reminds me of that time in 2005 when we were debating on whether Marshall McDougall or Mike Nickeas was a better prospect. I don’t think I need to say which of the two we ranked higher. I’ll just say that we all look ridiculous now.
"Alright class. Now that I've explained how silly the theory of evloution is, and how it's impossible for a specie to change over time, let's refocus on the Bible. I'd like to direct your attention to Genesis. Okay, now here's how the snake lost his voice..."
by YourNameHere on Dec 13, 2008 6:20 PM CST up reply actions
that was before my time here
just curious, who ended up being ranked higher?
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Bad joke...
It’s just weird that people get real passionate about the 26th ranked prospect in the organization. With 25 guys on a roster, there’s a decent chance that none of the guys ranked in this range play significant roles in the majors. After all, if you have Marcus Lemon ranked ahead of Pedro Strop, you could still believe there’s a 49% chance that Strop will turn out to be a better player than Lemon.
"Alright class. Now that I've explained how silly the theory of evloution is, and how it's impossible for a specie to change over time, let's refocus on the Bible. I'd like to direct your attention to Genesis. Okay, now here's how the snake lost his voice..."
by YourNameHere on Dec 13, 2008 8:00 PM CST up reply actions
I understood your point
I just wanted to know how wrong the community was :D
And this is also the same thing that will happen at draft time. You will have people pissed off about who the Rangers took in the 15th round knowing that anything outside of the first couple of rounds is a bad bet to even make the Majors.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
+1
" He throws it where he wants it, his breaking ball kept getting better and better and of course God gave him that special arm. He's great." ~ Neftali Feliz on Derek Holland.
by Kinslerhomer on Dec 13, 2008 3:31 PM CST up reply actions
Uh oh
Voted for Kyle O’Campo instead of Kennil Gomez. Whoops. Stupid K names, they get me everytime.
the kids a good prospect in my top 30
better than lemon drop
Ok enough
one of you should at least give some sort of an explanation for the irrational disdain for Lemon.
As a 20 year old, he had a .808 OPS in Bakersfield, that’s a higher # than both Borbon and Vallejo, two players ranked far ahead of him on this list. He plays an up-the-middle position, he takes walks, and is still young enough to develop more power. And it’s not like he’s 5’8" or something, he’s 5’11" can can still fill out from 170 lbs. How is that not better than 2 months of starts from an older player at a lower level who lacks overwhelming stuff (Gomez) or a guy coming off of a shoulder injury with mechanical issues (Strop).
I started to respond
But I decided I’d let zywica field this.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 4:08 PM CST up reply actions
I don't know that I'm going to say what you were, but
…I have some issues with that. First, weak is weak. The fact that he’s 5-11 doesn’t mean that he has the frame to project to hit the ball with authority. He can fill out, but he just doesn’t look like he’s going to be very strong or ever hit the ball very hard. Second, he is a middle of the diamond player, but at the one spot that demands the least physically, second base. And I don’t think he’s much more than passable there even. Third, and here is where I’ve always had my concerns with Lemon, he is a very polished player. That’s not a bad thing. But it means that his performance at a young age and medium levels is less meaningful. It’s good that he’s been physically able to handle the Cal League, but he’s had every advantage in his experience, every adjustment that can be made easier has been. So I worry that his advantage there will be chipped away at, and his age relative to level advantage will be less and less meaningful. And his one big strength, his OBP, could possibly be compromised as he moves up. As Adam has suggested, it makes sense that a player who cannot punish pitchers will have a relatively harder time maintaining a high walk rate in the majors. I’ve never disliked Lemon as a prospect, but all of that creates a picture of a nice infield utility player who is not an asset defensively. That’s something, but if I’m choosing, I see a lot more value in taking a pitcher who has the potential to play a more important role than that.
As far as these pitchers, the injury that I’m aware of with Strop is an elbow stress fracture, not anything with his shoulder. And I haven’t understood that it’s so much mechanics that caused it, but possibly just how fast his arm action is. Maybe I’m off base there, and maybe he will have problems moving forward with it. But guys often work through this problem, and he is an athletic guy with nasty stuff. If his package comes together he’s a serious late reliever, the kind of guy who could be a Jose Arredondo type of factor. That just holds a lot of value.
And Gomez has underwhelming stuff? My impression was that his stuff was actually pretty good, which, combined with a very impressive year, is why I would favor him.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:27 PM CST up reply actions
This.
As Adam has suggested, it makes sense that a player who cannot punish pitchers will have a relatively harder time maintaining a high walk rate in the majors.
With that said, I’m not betting on him being a utility player.
This is an exciting time in my life.
The LSB CPP's are in full bloom.
by inactive lsb user on Dec 13, 2008 4:33 PM CST up reply actions
I always read that Gomez threw in the low 90s with a good curve. Decent, but not exactly overwhelming at this point, especially given his lack of ability to stay healthy.
As far as Lemon goes, I guess it just goes back to the same supposition – does “doesn’t look like he’ll ever be very strong” necessarily translate to a lack of future power. And really, I don’t know what the difference is between a player who is 5’11" and 173 and someone who is 6’0" and 170. Is there such a large body type difference that was can safely say that one has “power” projection while the other does not?
More importantly, there really isn’t one of his statiscal points that shows he does not have power potential. He’s not hitting a large amount of ground balls (only 35% GB), and hits a high % of LDs, especially relative to the Cal League (14), and his ISOP and XBH doesn’t look all that different from players like Andrus or even Adrian Cardenas.
Maybe it’s just that people have different approaches to measuring “projectability” and different players develop at different rates, and all of that is fine. But I just feel that there’s an almost absurd amount of bias against “polished” players at times. Really, all of this is nonsensical, even saying that Lemon has “limited ceiling” is premature at this point since he’s a 20 year old with pretty generic indicators.
First of all
if we’re going to use statistical evidence, no one can really do anything to prove you wrong at this point, after his HA season. He hit for a little power, enough to raise the questions that you did. So if we’re discussing it primarily at that level, all someone who disagrees with you can say is, we’ll see.
But as far as body types, dimensions don’t tell you everything. Long guys with broad shoulders figure to add more to their frames than the narrower shouldered, hippy type. It’s another thing that can’t be proven, so I personally don’t dismiss someone who thinks that they can project some of the same things in Lemon as other skinny guys who did develop some strength, I just don’t see that for myself. As far as Lemon and Andrus, the difference isn’t that people think Andrus is going to add a lot of power, it’s that he’s just flat out a superior athlete who adds way more defensive value as a result.
On your second paragraph, I’m not sure exactly which two guys you’re comparing.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:51 PM CST up reply actions
The second paragraph
is just a hypothetical example of polished vs. projectable, and how quick we are to label a player as one or the other. Sometimes, polished players break out and hit pretty well too, it’s too early to limit a 20 year old to one part or the other.
As far as body types and projections go, I agree.
To me Z sounds pretty unbiased...
He presented what he did well statistically, what he didn’t do well statistically, his level of maturity, and his projected impact of his frame. To me that’s about as perfect as you can get in evaluating an imperfect science of prospects. Current tangibles, current intangibles, and projected future of both.
by slimshadty12 on Dec 13, 2008 7:30 PM CST up reply actions
We're talking about prospects
Everyone has their own biases.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Yes and No...
Maybe towards the weight of a particular factor (age, floor, ceiling, etc.).
It’s not like Z said, “he’s got no room for improvement, he’s a AAAA prospect.” He put together stats and on field evaluations to conclude chances are that he wouldn’t be a major league starter.
I mean some people act like that’s not reasonable when in fact, that’s what JD’s most important job is: Evaluating who’s going to be good and who’s not and sorting it from there whether it comes to the draft, the farm and the ML roster. It’s all an educated guess based on the most unbiased reliable information.
by slimshadty12 on Dec 13, 2008 8:49 PM CST up reply actions
Lemon
while i cant speak for others i can say why i havent voted for him.
i just havent been overly impressed. the reports i’ve seen are that he isn’t terrific defensively and he hits for avg. and takes walks but from the numbers ive seen he doesnt have much power and doesnt steal a ton of bases.
honestly i look forward to seeing him in frisco to get a look for myself.
"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg
Yet
he slugged over .400 in his age 19/20 season. Had a greater (way greater) LD% than either Borbon or Vallejo at Bakersfield and is only 20 years old. Not to mention that he doesn’t hit many groundballs (meaning that he’s getting his avg through contact, and not speed).
Why is it that some players (like say, Vallejo) are given the title of projectable, well Lemon is not?
vallejo
i’d say he is touted more highly because of defense and speed.
"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg
What have you
replace random “projectable” player there. Why is Lemon not seen as projectable despite evidence to the contrary?
If Lemon makes it to the major leagues
what kind of offensive performance would you expect from him on average?
I don't know
he’s a 20 year old kid in A ball. The discussion here is about why he is not viewed as projectable.
That's exactly why I am asking this question
ultimately, all prospects are measured by their likelihood of making MLB and their possible performance there. I am asking one of those two questions
If that's our criteria
then we have a lot of people ranked in the wrong place.
I think, just so you know, Lemon will develop more power than he is given credit for here. I can see him as a player who hits .300/.370/.450, a way above average offense second baseman.
Basically...
…you are hoping with Lemon that he becomes Todd Walker.
But that assumes that he develops more power, and retains the plate discipline, and continues to develop well.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 4:52 PM CST up reply actions
Pretty much
Todd walker was a pretty good player.
I don’t see, though, how we can assume that he will not do all of those things. He’s certainly held up well so far, despite being one of the youngest players in his league, and I don’t find anything too absurd about his performance so far. Is that assumption that he develops really that out there? Is it anymore ridiculous than voting for someone like Thomas Diamond b/c of previous attachmetns or Kennil Gomez b/c of three months of performance?
Gomez has a track record
of at least 3 years in the system.
Should we
begin counting Lemon’s stats at Eustice High too?
He has 100 innings of stats that I have access to.
can't say that
rooting around Eustice High’s website would be all that enjoyable though…
x
I don’t see, though, how we can assume that he will not do all of those things.
I don’t think anyone is assuming he won’t. I think that, in evaluating him, you determine the likelihood he will do those things, and the likelihood he will do some of them (enough of them that he is a major league contributor, anyway), and look at how much value he would provide under those scenarios, and then compare it to the likelihood that some other prospect will achieve various possibilities and how much value that player would provide.
This gets back to the Wes Littleton v. Fabio Castillo debate from a few years ago…would you rather have a guy who has a 75% chance of being a decent contributing major league reliever and a 25% chance of being nothing, or a guy who has a 80% chance of doing nothing, a 10% chance of being a decent contributing major league reliever, a 5% chance of being a dominant reliever, a 4% chance of being a decent major league starter, and a 1% chance of being a great major league starte?
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 4:59 PM CST up reply actions
That's fine
and I value the polished players more because I think they’re more liable to become useful parts of the major league team. I don’t think, though, that the difference of star potential between someone like Lemon and someone like Gomez is so great that we can say “Gomez below Lemon is an embarrassment”
It's up to you
but to say “likelihood” is the only indicator would be overly limitng. Most everyone fluctuates between a mix of projectability and polish, how you judge is up to you.
Hmm?
I didn’t say likelihood is the only indicator, i said it’s expected performance at the major level and likelihood of getting there. The combination of the two determines how a prospect should be looked at
I am not sure what we are disagreeing about, projectability and polish are just different ways to say those two things.
The precedent-based case for Lemon
I didn’t vote for Lemon but in my opinion, he is a very compelling prospect and likely to become a valuable major league player given his performance at a young age relative to his competition.
As I noted in a previous comment in the LSB prospect ranking series, the easiest way to identify future major league players is to review the youngest players in the minor leagues for each level between High A and AAA and then to use something like OPS or OBP to rank them. Marcus Lemon was among the twenty youngest position players to get at least 100 at bats in High A in 2008. His final line was 295/374/434/808 though it was ~320/420/460/880 before a terrible month of August.
Among the 20 youngest players in High A with at least 100 at-bats, Lemon was fifth in OBP behind Lars Anderson (408), Logan Morrison (402), Nicholas Weglarz (396), and Yamaico Navarro (393), and ahead of better known prospects Adrian Cardenas (356), Greg Halman (320), and Chris Marrero (325). Lemon was seventh in SLG behind Greg Halman (572), Lars Anderson (513), Logan Morrison (494), Austin Gallagher (456), Chris Marrero (453), and Cedric Hunter (442). Worth noting is that almost all of the players ini the above paragraph are highly regarded prospects.
To provide perspective on how good Lemon’s 374 OBP and 808 OPS as a 20 yo in High A was, below are the players who had at least 100 at bats in High A and had an OBP of at least 370 and an OPS of at least 790 at the age of 20 or less between 2002 and 2005.
Grady Sizemore – 390/792
Josh Barfield – 392/922
Dave Krynzel – 378/838
Rocco Baldelli – 370/910
Joe Mauer – 397/809
Casey Kotchman – 432/956
Edwin Encarnacion – 389/873
Jeff Mathis – 380/880
Andy Marte – 375/844
Jeremy Hermida – 374/815
Elijah Dukes – 405/945
Jesus Guzman – 389/832
Adam Jones – 374/868
Daric Barton – 438/907
Billy Butler – 419/1055
Saltalamacchia – 394/913
Brandon Wood – 383/1055
Lastings Milledge – 385/803
The OBP and OPS for a few interesting players who played High A at the age of 20 or less and who failed to make Lemon’s OBP/OPS:
Jose Reyes – 355/817
Jayson Nix – 344/819
Dioner Navarro – 355/822
Felix Pie – 358/800
Erick Aybar – 355/844
Hanley Ramirez – 355/744
Troy Tulowitzki – 343/800
Ian Stewart – 353/850
David Wright – 368/827
Young-for-their-league guys are far more likely to maintain or improve their stats as they progress through the minors than their older counterparts. Personally, I will be very surprised if Lemon fails to at least match his Cal League numbers at Frisco next year given the young-for-their-league precedent and the progress that he showed between his 19 and 20 yo seasons (see below).
2007 in Clinton – 261/353/364/717
2008 in Bakersfield – 295/374/434/808
In my opinion, Lemon fits comfortably among Hunter, Poveda, Kiker, Boscan, Perez, Beltre, Feliz, and Andrus as compelling prospects who performed well in 2008 while playing in leagues filled with guys who were much older than themselves.
by spurdynasty on Dec 13, 2008 8:49 PM CST up reply actions 5 recs
The argument wasn't really about his performance at A+
But rather how much more room he would have for improvement given his physical attributes. I think most folks who are a bit more down on him fear that he will stall at some higher minor level simply because he will have reached his “talent cap”. Whether this is a real concern is a matter of scouting, and I am not sure how much stats can help us to answer that question.
The MLB is filled with guys whose physical gifts appear limited (check the 2008 AL MVP)
It is unclear to me that anyone who posts at LSB knows Marcus Lemon well enough to know if he has room to improve. Perhaps an off-season workout program or a tip from a hitting instructor will allow him to improve his power. Even if there is not a significant improvement in power, he appears to have the bat/eye to be a high OBP guy that can be a valuable middle-iinfielder in the majors.
Regarding Lemon’s athleticism, I have not seen him play. But, I do know that in the games that I listened to, he seemed to have excellent range at SS though, like Andrus, he tended to make errors trying to do too much.
Regarding the use of minor league stats, I’ve stared at enough to know that young-for-their-league players tend to maintain or improve their numbers as they graduate up the line. Furthermore, as noted in the list of players that I provided (I didn’t leave anyone out), young guys with similar or better stats than Lemon almost always graduate to the major leagues and become productive players. Lemon might be the exception, but I wouldn’t bet on it.
thanks
spurdynasty, i’ve been trying to say that its just really hard to put lemon below some of the guys we’ve been putting ahead of him simply b/c his performance is so compelling for a guy his age at his level. Im not saying his Scouting reports are stellar, but when you’re performing that well, at a young age, its stupid to continually run him down simply because he doesnt have a whole lot in the tool box
Im rec'ing this
For the Lemon haters to read.
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract
I don't think the Lemon "hate"
has anything to do with his stats. On paper Lemon looks more attractive than he actually is. I still like Lemon and ranked him #24 in system back in October, but the stats simply don’t paint an accurate picture of the player.
Is he expected to start next year in AA?
Are you expecting his numbers to drop off a bit at that level?
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract
The stats show a very patient hitter
who won’t get fooled often at a plate appearance. Is there something that different in what you see of him in person? There’s not much power there, but he is only 20 years old and a MI isn’t exactly expected to knock the ball out of the park 30 times a season. As spurdynasty said, a good offseason workout plan or some minor tweaks of his mechanics could turn him into a better power hitter, at least to the point that he keeps pitchers honest.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Well
This is very unlikely:
As spurdynasty said, a good offseason workout plan or some minor tweaks of his mechanics could turn him into a better power hitter, at least to the point that he keeps pitchers honest.
All players make adjustments to improve, but you can’t improve what isn’t there. Lemon is not going to hit for much power at the higher levels. Lemon does not have the frame to support much physical projection and his swing, which I like, is not really crafted to produce much lift.
Lemon flashed some really good leather at 2B at instructs and I really liked his approach at the plate. Of course taking walks against pitchers who don’t often throw quality strikes doesn’t really suggest all that much. It’s a positive sign, but that’s about it.
AA projection for Lemon
I’m curious to hear what you project for Lemon next year, Jason. I’ve got him at 295/380/420/800 +/- 25 OPS points. That would place Lemon among the Top 10 hitting MIF in all of AA despite being one of the levels’ youngest infielders. Do you think that batting projection is high or low?
One last thing, I have Lemon ranked in the mid-20’s as well despite the fact that I think he can carry a 750-800 OPS up to the major leagues. I am just very excited about many of the young pitchers in the organization.
by spurdynasty on Dec 13, 2008 10:50 PM CST up reply actions
I tend to value the pitchers as well
As for Lemon: I think your Lemon projection is high. I’m not sure he will be able to hit .295/.380 at AA. Honestly, I’m not really sure what to expect for Lemon. He’s one of those players that has a chance to defy his skill set, which is why I ranked him #24. I’m actually a fan of Lemon, I’m just not sure how much more he can develop.
My guess: .270/.350/.380
A proposal
I’ve been trying to get a handle on how to weight scouting vs stats in projecting future performances for minor leaguers. I view this as being akin to comparing the impact of nature vs nurture on how people develop.
I can handle the stats side but am having a devil of a time accumulating enough scouting data to provide a reasonable way to estimate player performance based exclusively on scouting. Would you be interested in an exercise wherein we identify a dozen or so prospects whose 2009 performances we can both project (you by scouting, me by a mathematical algorithm)? I understand that your task will be complicated by the fact that your projections will be at least somewhat biased by what you know of the players’ past performance, but I think the exercise might produce enough data to begin to develop an idea of how beneficial scouting can be in projecting future performance.
by spurdynasty on Dec 13, 2008 11:18 PM CST up reply actions
I'm not expecting major power from him
You think its impossible for him to have enough power to hit maybe a .420 SLG in the Majors?
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
so you're saying there's a chance...
End of discussion :D
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Among the 20 youngest players in High A with at least 100 at-bats, Lemon was fifth in OBP behind Lars Anderson (408), Logan Morrison (402), Nicholas Weglarz (396), and Yamaico Navarro (393), and ahead of better known prospects Adrian Cardenas (356), Greg Halman (320), and Chris Marrero (325). Lemon was seventh in SLG behind Greg Halman (572), Lars Anderson (513), Logan Morrison (494), Austin Gallagher (456), Chris Marrero (453), and Cedric Hunter (442). Worth noting is that almost all of the players ini the above paragraph are highly regarded prospects
however several have serious holes in their game – wegarlz w/ defense, cardines with position, halman with k’s, marrerro with health, morrison with ks, gallagher is a lot like andrus in that he doesnt have much power and hunter dissapointed greatly this year
Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.
by knockoutking on Dec 14, 2008 2:03 AM CST up reply actions
Speed
almost always over hyped.
This is an exciting time in my life.
The LSB CPP's are in full bloom.
by inactive lsb user on Dec 13, 2008 4:34 PM CST up reply actions
He's still very young and he's got gritty intangibles coming right out of his (probably sweet smelling) butt.
I think he’s got a good chance to be an above average major league second baseman at the big league level for many years. Or a really good chance to at least be a very nice utility guy.
And this isn’t some Little Tugger thing where we were all just rooting for the little guy to make it against all odds. Lemon is a kid we bought out of his UT scholarship with a seven figure bonus. They must’ve thought kind of highly of him to go that high for a 4th rounder, right?
The 40 Trumps All!!!
There are two kinds of men in this world: Men who make jump throws, and men who wish that they were Derek Jeter so that they could make jump throws.
by thedirkatron on Dec 13, 2008 4:26 PM CST up reply actions
yea
i agree with this, he’s already shown he’s capable of being an above avg 2nd basemen at 20 yrs old. Thats alot more than a bunch of other guys we’ll have in the 20s
x
he’s already shown he’s capable of being an above avg 2nd basemen at 20 yrs old.
I don’t think he has.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 4:47 PM CST up reply actions
On base numbers in the lower minors
Don’t forget how raw the pitchers are in the minors, especially below AA. It’s probably MUCH easier to lay off bad pitches because they’re not just missing by an inch, they’re really missing. And some of them are probably telegraphing their selection as they develop new pitches.
If he maintains that walk rate in AA he gets more kudos from me.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
I'm trying to decide if this means anything
Cal League Walk-Rate (2008) = 9.27%
Texas League Walk-Rate (2008) = 10.06%
PCL Walk Rate (2008) = 10.26%
So, either prospects get better at working walks as they progress, or
only prospects with good plate discipline advance, or
umpires are more stringent at the upper levels, or
pitchers become less willing to throw strikes as they progress.
In any case, I see no evidence to support the idea that the High A to AA promotion will significantly affect Lemon’s walk-rate.
by spurdynasty on Dec 14, 2008 12:09 AM CST up reply actions 1 recs
There are a lot
of variables, to be sure. I’m just saying that for some players, a high walk rate in the lower levels might not mean exactly what it means at a higher level. And in Lemon’s case, I suspect he’ll still walk at a good rate.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
above average in A ball
the skills he’s exhibited (avg,obp,ops, etc) are things i’d like to see againt AA pitchers and see how they look then.
if he can hold up the average and obp in AA i might become more of a believer.
"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg
Someone just
post links to the interminable debates that happened over the summer. BTIA also had a comp between the two.
Thanks
and I’ve read most of that (and started most of the arguments), but all I’ve heard so far is that “well, he’s not real projectable” what makes him so? That’s the argument that we should have, especially given some of the other players we choose to label as such.
I think it boils down to
scouts thinking that he doesn’t have the athleticism to be an asset defensively, and does not look likely to develop the kind of strength to hit the ball hard or develop top bat speed. I also think that Vallejo’s tools are a bit overblown among our set of Rangers fans. Unlike Lemon he is pretty strong, but he’s a good athlete, not Bo Jackson.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:43 PM CST up reply actions
And that's fine
some people give the words of scouts more weigh than others. What is ridiculous is the mass of people who like to act that their opinions are somehow more justified than those of others. Some of us have attachments to certain players, does that make the votes we make a sort of joke?
Yeah
I don’t think you’re talking about me when it comes to Lemon, but some others.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:54 PM CST up reply actions
I shall pose a question...
…I posed in another thread…
The Rangers are busted for tampering with an A’s front office type. Bud Selig says the punishment is that the A’s get one of two players — either Marcus Lemon or Pedro Strop. Jon Daniels picks which one of those two the A’s get.
Should Daniels give the A’s Lemon or Strop?
And you can change it to Lemon v. Madrigal, or Lemon v. Gomez, or whomever else.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 4:54 PM CST up reply actions
Well you could answer that as Lemon
just because the Rangers have a pretty good 2B right now and are more desperate for pitchers.
But, that doesn’t mean Lemon is any less of a prospect
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 4:56 PM CST up reply actions
I think you ignore that aspect
in a hypothetical like this.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:57 PM CST up reply actions
Well then it's a stupid hypothetical
But to play along — I’d give them Gomez over any of the other guys listed.
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:04 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think so
Particularly when you’re talking about players of this caliber, you should be concerned with which one is actually going to be good much more than anything else.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 5:06 PM CST up reply actions
Then the hypothetical needs to be worded that way
because when you bring another team into it, you bring their needs into it too.
If you’re just focusing on who’s going to be the better player…why not just ask who is going to be the better player?
Adding the other variables to it makes it harder to think in a vacuum about that stuff.
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:12 PM CST up reply actions
I don't think that's the point of bringing Oakland into it
The idea is that you don’t like to let go of a good player, but you really don’t like to let him go to your rival. Since that’s pretty much the worst thing you can imagine, you figure to take the decision more seriously and really get down the bare fact of who you want to keep and who you can afford to expose. To me, it’s pretty much my BiTA+ approach with some real world application.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 5:18 PM CST up reply actions
Well
Like I said, without any kind of qualifier in the hypothetical, I’m going to give them the player that the MLB club has less of a need for at the moment and in the foreseeable future.
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:24 PM CST up reply actions
x
If you’re just focusing on who’s going to be the better player…why not just ask who is going to be the better player?
I don’t think that’s necessarily the case, though. You can think the guy who is going to be the better player is not as good a prospect.
For example…let’s say we know there’s a 95% chance that Johnny Fairplay is going to be a nice utility infielder who can fill in at any of the positions if someone is out with an injury for a few weeks without killing you, but isn’t a starting caliber player. He’ll be Ramon Vazquez, say. And there’s a 5% chance he just flames out and is nothing.
Then there’s a guy, let’s call him Boston Dave, who has a 50% chance of being nothing, a 25% chance of being a Fairplay/Vazquez type, a 15% chance of being a solid everyday middle infielder, and a 10% chance of being an All-Star.
I’d rank Boston Dave ahead of Johnny Fairplay, even though Fairplay is likely going to be the better player.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 5:25 PM CST up reply actions
I've noticed you put "x" in the subject when you don't agree
weird.
I can agree with what you’re saying — I guess I just don’t like the way you worded your hypothetical. I can get over it though.
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:29 PM CST up reply actions
No
I put an “x” in the subject when I don’t have a subject.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 5:51 PM CST up reply actions
I thought
an “x” is the subject was if you were going to give an example.
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract
You dont have to put a “x” there in 2.0.
It just seems like every time you don’t have a subject you also don’t agree.
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 6:01 PM CST up reply actions
Heh
I think it stands for “wrong.”
Interesting catch, though.
This is an exciting time in my life.
The LSB CPP's are in full bloom.
by inactive lsb user on Dec 13, 2008 6:46 PM CST up reply actions
Boston Dave and Johnny Fairplay?
This has to be some sort of nerd reference I’m not getting. Which is weird cause I pride myself on being a huge nerd.
The 40 Trumps All!!!
There are two kinds of men in this world: Men who make jump throws, and men who wish that they were Derek Jeter so that they could make jump throws.
by thedirkatron on Dec 13, 2008 9:11 PM CST up reply actions
Johnny Fairplay
Is the guy from Survivor that escaped getting voted off by faking his grandma’s death. He had his 15 minutes and tried to build off that a bit with some random crap. Danny Bonaduce beat the crap out of him.
Don’t know who Boston Dave is
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Thanks.
Anytime I don’t know what Adam is talking about I just assume it’s either from House or from one those super dorky nerd books he enjoys, like the Cryptnomicmoanmaneninaton or whatever.
I googled Boston Dave and all I got was some weird blog thing by some fat guy.
The 40 Trumps All!!!
There are two kinds of men in this world: Men who make jump throws, and men who wish that they were Derek Jeter so that they could make jump throws.
by thedirkatron on Dec 14, 2008 4:42 AM CST up reply actions
Boston Dave
He was a competitor on the original Paradise Hotel.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 14, 2008 9:43 AM CST up reply actions
Wait...
You watched Paradise Hotel?
"I´d like to apologize in advance for anything that I may say or do that could be construed as offensive as I slowly go NUTS."
I watched some episodes
It was pretty funny, I thought.
Then, one holiday weekend, they had a marathon on Reality Channel of Paradise Hotel, and my wife watched it all, so I ended up seeing most of it then.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 14, 2008 10:14 AM CST up reply actions
*raises eyebrow*
They have a reality channel now? Dear god…
"I´d like to apologize in advance for anything that I may say or do that could be construed as offensive as I slowly go NUTS."
Adam is married
Reality TV is the worst thing that’s happened to mankind since WWII, but you pretty much have to give married guys a free pass. They should be ashamed to like more than one or two of them themselves, but you can’t really kill a guy over being willing to watch shows his wife likes. It’s just one of those things.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 14, 2008 3:25 PM CST up reply actions
Two words:
Side Room.
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
Why would you give them Gomez instead of Lemon?
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 5:14 PM CST up reply actions
Because I don't think he's as good of a prospect
as Lemon
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:15 PM CST up reply actions
I was hoping to get you to expand on that
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 5:16 PM CST up reply actions
Where's your opinion?
You just let Z say it all
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:22 PM CST up reply actions
I'd probably put Gomez ahead of Lemon
I’ve voted for Madrigal or Strop the last several times.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 5:25 PM CST up reply actions
You mean in the hypothetical?
or your rankings?
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:26 PM CST up reply actions
In the rankings
In the hypo, I’d let them have Lemon, for the same reason I’ve been voting Strop and Madrigal ahead of Lemon.
This is boring me, though…let’s talk about the Kidd trade. :)
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 5:27 PM CST up reply actions
ha
We’re already too far into the waterfall comments thing they would be all on the same row here pretty soon.
I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles
by Dirk Diggler on Dec 13, 2008 5:30 PM CST up reply actions
How about the most underrated coach in the NBA
Rick Carlisle
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract
I would give Strop instead of Lemon
Same with Gomez. Not sure on Madrigal.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
I would rather keep
Madrigal, Gomez and Strop, but as Dirk said, this is more of a question of the strength of our system and the weakness of our ML pitching staff.
That said, I think that Lemon is the superior prospect to Gomez and possibly Strop depending on the injury.
Based soley on whether or
not a player “projects” as a major league starter, Strop wins by a long shot. He has ML quality stuff that might allow him to close in a few years. Otherwise he would seem to a lock to be a dominant setup guy. As for Gomez, his first half was dominant, on par with any other player in the system.
I don’t see Lemon dominating games outside of A+ or as a utility player in the bigs.
That injury
Elbow and shoulder injuries tend to lower my valuation of a player by quite a bit, but that’s a personal thing.
As far as Gomez being “on par with any other player in the system”. No.
His K% (19) was way lower than guys like Feliz (32), Holland (27% in Clinton), Main (27% as well). Hell, Jared Hyatt in 2007 did much better than he did as far as peripherals go. He looks like a nice prospect, but given he’s shown neither durability or overwhelming stuff or overwhelming stats, let’s not get overboard.
Strop's injury
was a fracture at the tip of his elbow; there is no soft tissue involved. By all accounts, he is ready to begin long toss right now (6 months out) and the rangers project him to begin pitching off the mound.
As for Gomez, you misread my post: his first half was on par with anyone else in the system; I said nothing about ranking him as a #1 starter.
And it wasn't
I read it well, and when someone throws up a K rate 15%+, you’re not on par with them.
I just feel uncomfortable with elbow injuries, especially when there are mechanical issues involved as well. Remember when B-Mac was supposed to be back by June?
votes
no your vote for lemon isn’t a joke. the 25-30 range is about right for him though i personally still have a few guys higher.
the real joke was the guys who were voting clark murphy in the top 10-15
"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg
Probably my biggest issue
is with Golson. There is upside there, but he’s been in pro ball long enough to safely say that it’s going to be a major upset if he ever hits in the majors. In an average system there’s room for a guy like that in the 20s somewhere, but given the makeup of this one, I’d never trade some of these pitchers for someone who profiles like Golson. I felt the same sort of thing about Mayberry.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 5:00 PM CST up reply actions
Yeah, but...
…if he were Gregorio Golzonaz, you’d be all about him…
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 13, 2008 5:03 PM CST up reply actions
Something about that name
makes him seem much more appealing.
Seriously though, I’m actually not big on the Latin hitter who doesn’t show any control over the strikezone. I like the ones who show some of that to go along with physical ability, but I mean everyone does. Part of the reason I liked Beltre initially was that as last (2007) summer went on, he seemed to adjust and develop some plate control. Reports had his approach as pretty good for a young hitter as well. But things just fell apart on him this year, and the fact that he was never able to make any real progress is disturbing, even as young as he is.
Where I think I can deserve this label is with the pitchers, because they seem, on the whole, to be more equipped to adjust to the American/MLB style of baseball than some of the less polished hitters. And I think that there can be a real value in investing in several Latin arms and letting them sort themselves out.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 5:13 PM CST up reply actions
As to
the Borbon/Vallejo vs Lemon part, that is the one reason to not rank those two where we did. It’s everything else that they have going for them that gets them ranked, the stuff that they have that Lemon doesn’t.
Plus there’s the fact that we know how well they adjusted to AA and don’t know how Lemon will.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:40 PM CST up reply actions
Moreland
How many organizations would Moreland be in the top 20?
Mitch Moreland - Rangers 2009 Minor League Player of the Year
Moreland is a really interesting case
I don’t know how in the world you place him. The guy had a great first full season, but I just don’t think that you can conclude a whole lot from a guy who played at Mississippi St going to Low A and having a good deal of success. If he’d done something like that in High A, where a lot of the good major college players spend their first full season, or even done it for part of the year, or for that matter if he’d failed there, I’d have a much easier time placing him. He certainly adjusted well to pro ball in going from the NWL to the MWL, so that’s a good thing.
Then toss in the fact that he’s shown a little promise as a left handed pitcher, with a good FB and something of a second pitch, to the point that some think that this is where he needs to proceed.
How do you rank that guy? For myself, I’d rank him in this range, the mid-back 20s, and I’d be ready to move him up quite a bit if he shows that either he can sustain that offense at higher levels or is promising on the mound. I’m definitely interested in his 2009, though.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:12 PM CST up reply actions
I thought he just had an average
fastball 88-91?
I had it in my head that the thought was that he was capable of sustaining 90/91 plus velocity if he runs with it, but I have not proactively researched what the results were from him on the mound at instructs.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:28 PM CST up reply actions
yeah I have
the “91” stuck in my head too possible from intructs (or maybe a pre draft report) but I thought that was his max velo; I could be wrong…
That sounds right
I just assume that a guy who can basically step on the mound and hit 91 has a chance to throw harder as his arm gets stronger, and his mechanics potentially improve. I realize that it doesn’t always work that way, but I can point to some cases. Wilkins de la Rosa was throwing 94-95 this year, and he didn’t do that immediately upon stepping on the mound. Plus, lefties obviously don’t have to throw any harder than that if they have some other elements to their game.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:36 PM CST up reply actions
It certainly is possible
he could make the transition, perhaps more speedily than most position to pitcher converts, as he pitched in college. I have to say, I’m not sure what kind of vote of confidence it is to have a nice season (his first season as a full-time hitter) and have the org ask you to pitch in instructs. Doesn’t seem to bode well in my book…
This is what I have heard
and take it with a grain of salt. He is a gorilla hitter. The definition of see ball, hit ball, mechanics be damned. While that may hold value in the lower minors as he progresses pitchers will be able to exploit his weaknesses rather easily. Maybe the Rangers agree with that assessment thus the subtle push to pitching. Also, it could be a testament to the talent they project on the mound for him.
Personally, I think they should just put him AA to challenge him. Dont know where he is projected to start the season at though.
by Michael Cave on Dec 13, 2008 5:34 PM CST up reply actions
Aren't there real concerns about his swing?
It’s long and there’s whispers he might get exposed as he moves up.
From MJH:
Here’s a guy who led the Midwest League in batting average, OPS, slugging percentage, extra-base hits and RBIs. My virtually every objective measure, Moreland was the best hitter in the Midwest League and he wasn’t ranked as one of the league’s top-20 prospects according to Baseball America.
SNIP, SNIP
When Moreland was at Mississippi State, he was one of the SEC’s best power hitters but he was also an excellent left handed pitcher. Many scouts believed that his swing was full of holes and would be exposed in wood bat competition, but that hasn’t happened yet. In fact, he struck out just 67 times in 466 at-bats while drawing 60 walks.
I think he’s one of tose guys who’s gonna have to show something at AA before he starts really getting any R-E-S-P-E-C-K.
The 40 Trumps All!!!
There are two kinds of men in this world: Men who make jump throws, and men who wish that they were Derek Jeter so that they could make jump throws.
by thedirkatron on Dec 13, 2008 4:30 PM CST up reply actions
The lower part is why I think 2009 will be when we start to sort him out
For one thing, I don’t know what adjustments he might have made. He was pretty bad in the NYP, then very good in teh MWL. Maybe there is a good reason for that, or maybe he will in fact be exposed at the next level or two.
The upper part means nothing to me. He was old relative to guys they want to rank, and the list of guys who had no right being left off lists like that but were is extremely long.
by Brett Perryman on Dec 13, 2008 4:34 PM CST up reply actions
sorry
didnt even see this convo when i wrote what i wrote above
by Michael Cave on Dec 13, 2008 8:37 PM CST up reply actions
I'm looking for
a really clear definition of “projection” or “projectible” in regards to prospects. Context clues have given me a pretty decent idea of what people mean – but I’d like see it spelled out clearly. Any idea where to look?
I guess you heard Fat Joe left Atlantic.
Ill' try
Projection is a general term which gives comps to current players or former player. Not necessarily in terms of stardom or numbers (sometimes thats the case) but their body of work. Their pitch repetoire, their skill sets, the build, etc
Projectable means they have the skills to make those projections. If a guy is 6’0, 200 lbs and already built but can’t hit the warning track from 2nd base then its hard to say hes projectable to hit for power. Whereas if a guy is 6’0 and 165 and has a good swing with a good angle of attack and hits the ball on the sweet spot alot you could say hes projectable to hit for power because as he fills out and matures physically his power should grow. Basically if a guy is maxed out physically in an aspect its hard to project anything beyond what he already has. Whereas if a guy has room to grow you can say hes projectable. Not all projections come true however.
I hope im not completely off base with all that.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
it's late
but thanks. that makes sense… and is about in line with what i was thinking. it’s good to see it spelled out clearly though.
I guess you heard Fat Joe left Atlantic.
by Haeger Champ on Dec 20, 2008 8:37 PM CST up reply actions
voted Clark Murphy
At this point in the ranking process (and really since 24/25 for me) there’s a lot of players who are about even. A lot of talent that is either limited and more sure (Strop, Arias, Tracy, Moreland) or guys far away who could develop into excellent pitching or hitting prospects in a year or two.
So at this point I’m going all out with my gut. And my gut’s telling me Clark Murphy is going to be a pretty good power hitter in a few years. He’s so far away it’s hard to make a really good argument for him. You either like him over the rest of these guys or you don’t. But if he doesn’t make it onto this list until we get into the 30s, then goddamn we got some good times ahead of us.
In a similar manner, I absolutely love Geuris Grullon.
why do you like G. Grullon?
He has spent 2 seasons in the AZL and his innings and peripherals haven’t changed much. I think he seems like a hit or miss kid. I happen to think that J Grullon might be a better prospect. They are the same age, but J grullon spen the last 2 seasons at DSL1. His #s improved a lot in his second year. I don’t know a lot about his stuff but I think you may see both Grullons in A- this year. I also suspect that J Grullon may have had a visa issue or something. His #s in DSL at 17 are comparable to all of our top propsects who have started off there and it would have been logical to promote him to AZL at 18. Just a guess…
lots of groundballs and Ks
I know he’s got high flameout potential, that he doesn’t have very good control of his stuff, and that he’s tall, thin, and lanky without much muscle yet, but I just like him. Maybe it’s his cool name that first attracted me, honestly. But he does have a high ceiling. He does have a lot of talent. Just imagine if he shows up at Spokane a little bulkier, a little more filled out, maybe another mph or two on his fastball. Even if his control doesn’t improve he can dominate (or at least do well) in the NW league. Look at Neil Ramirez. His control was not good at all, but his stuff just blew guys away. GG’s stuff gets guys to swing and miss and hit weak grounders. If he gets stronger, then he’s even more effective.
And then in the coming years, with proper coaching, further development, who can say what his ceiling might be? I know that can be said of tons of young Latin pitchers. But I’m just partial to this one. Again, he might be out of baseball in two years, but he might be very good as well. And, in either case, I am a fan of Geuris Grullon. All gut so far, but we’ll see.
maybe
but for whatever reason he has only pitched 45 innings in 2 years whereas J grullon has pitched about 130 so what you make of GG’s stats would indeed be a gut feeling…
45 innings
Reasons: Pitched in AZL league 2 years in a row, where there’s a lot of pitchers to share only a short season of innings. His 2nd year in Surprise he worked as a reliever, which further limited his innings. He’s still being developed as a starter, though, and already has a 4-pitch arsenal (4-seam FB, CU, SL, CB).
Juan Grullon pitched in the DSL, which has a longer season, for those same two years. Yet he only pitched 91.1 innings, not 130. The gap isn’t the grand canyon or anything. Feliz, if you remember, had his innings limited in a similar manner to Geuris before the 08 season.
I know you’re skeptical, and I think we’ve had this debate once before, but you can have your Juan and I’ll have my Geuris (see my new avatar picture), and we’ll just have to wait and see what the Fighting Grullons do come July.
Yeah Z's had him on our radar for a while now
still awaiting word on whether he’s coming stateside …
This is an exciting time in my life.
The LSB CPP's are in full bloom.
by inactive lsb user on Dec 13, 2008 6:50 PM CST up reply actions
might as well start calling Gomez "Jesus"
because he’s gonna turn a lot of people into believers next year.
I'm really disappointed...
in you Tron. Stop letting Firebat fight all your Lemon battles for you.
Step it up for your mancrush.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates
I voted Fabio Castillo
the few Castillo voters are rather quiet. But I really like his arm.
I guess you heard Fat Joe left Atlantic.
He is still in my radar
though not in the top 30 anymore. He did pretty well in a relief role last year and if he can’t figure out his mechanics/approach as a starter that is a role he could have success in. I think people forget he was a 19yo in full season ball last yr. I would imagine the rangers run him out as a starter until he proves he can’t handle it. However, I think he could handle a relief role in A+ next year:
His #s in relief last year: 29g /4.53 era/4sv/60ip/58h/7hr/30bb/55so/.85 go/ao/.256baa
as a starter: 7g/6.75era/31ip/30h/4hr/17bb/23so/1.37go/ao/.261
Jock for me.
Freak injury, no effect on joints/soft tissue, will have an impact in MLB in ’09.
I hope.
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
Ya know
I’m ok with Lemon being ranked mid-twenties. I’m not convinced about him but I hope he emerges as a starting caliber 2b.
However, if Arias makes #30 on the list that will truly be embarrassing….
Well, hopefully Gomez, O'Campo and Pimentel will round this list out
I don’t really see any other positional prospects I’d put in the top 30, myself. Moreland, Clark Murphy, Chad Tracy ext – they’re ok, but not top 30 material IMO.
"I´d like to apologize in advance for anything that I may say or do that could be construed as offensive as I slowly go NUTS."
though I have Santana 30 and Pimentel 31
I think Santana will have a nice year, hopefully at catcher. He won’t turn 20 until a couple of months into the season and missed 06 due to injury so he has plenty of time IMO.
Time for Santana
He’s Rule 5 eligible after next year and a minor league free agent after 2011. The clock is ticking. 121 strikeouts in 360 PAs in A ball is downright ugly.
I'd just like to say
I love that arguably the best discussion in this series took place over Marcus freaking Lemon.
I had a paper route when I was a kid. I was supposed to go to 2,000 houses. Or two dumpsters.
I thought Pedro had this
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract

by 


















