Transaction Oracle on Tex Signing and Potential Salary Cap
"However, the strongest advocates of a salary cap, the ones ranting about salaries in light of the economy, are full of hot air. And something else, but the site nanny won't let me say it."
about 3 years ago
Randy Richardson
12 comments
4 recs |
Comments
That was such a great article
it should be illegal
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
agreed that was good
and thank goodness he’s not a not a Yankees fan :) Well, shouldn’t matter, but I hate them too
i do however disagree with some of his ZiPS Projections. Not in a bad way. I just don’t see Teixeira dropping in HR from 2011-14 or in RBI from 2011-14
Revenues are local, correct?
If MLB revenues have grown but player salaries haven’t kept up, might that mean the revenue growth is dominated by a few large teams?
I don’t think the Royals, Rangers, Rays, etc have increased their revenues much over the past few years.
So, since revenue is local rather than corporate, that would mean the small market teams might not have had the wherewhithal to increase their payroll while the large market teams might have. I think it would be cool to see the ratio of slaries to revenue for each team and how that has changed over the past few years.
Go Rangers!
revenues
I would imagine the single largest source of revenue is the national television contract. Plus there’s revenue sharing to aid the small market teams. Obviously, local revenues will vary.
by Randy Richardson on Dec 26, 2008 9:02 PM CST up reply actions
Revenue Distribution
Local media contracts made up 41% of total media revenue in baseball last year. The local media revenue is shared at 31% while national media, international media, and internet media are shared at 100%. In fact, the commissioner actually has wide leeway to distribute the national TV contract and Selig actually gives the lower revenue teams a greater cut of the national contract than the big revenue teams.
You add in lesser figures for the luxury tax (paid mostly by the Yankees) and various national sponsorships and merchandising (unless it’s sold in-stadium or in a store wholly owned by a team, all merchandising revenues are shared at 100% as well), and we’re talking about an impressive amount of shared revenue going on. The Marlins now essentially start off with roughly 80 million dollars in revenue before selling a single ticket.
Internet and international have been the fastest growing revenue sources for teams. 2008 figures aren’t public yet, but MLB Advanced Media is expected to be in the half a billion dollar range by itself (owned equally by the 30 teams from investments each kicked in of $2.6 million a few years ago).
MLB is awash with cash right now from top to bottom. I don’t want to see the Yankees signing all these players, I want all these teams, which do have the money out there, to be getting these players too. Forbes estimates the Marlins had an operating profit of $37 million (which doesn’t included MLBAM profits, which are considered separate). The team could’ve signed 2 of Sabathia/Burnett/Teixeira without going into the red even if it didn’t generate a cent in extra revenue, which is an absurdly ridiculous scenario!
While I support the right to make a profit strenuously, I feel that if someone’s giving you a lot of money to invest, there’s some ethical responsibility to use that money in the spirit intended. My grandfather gave me a good chunk of money back when I was entering college and while I would’ve been perfectly within my rights to spend it on an Audi, I don’t think it would have been the right thing to do.
I believe that the Marlins, Pirates, and Royals have a duty to spend the money, money they have relatively little part in generating (the Yankees, for instance, need teams to play, but they certainly don’t absolutely need 29 of them!) and an additional duty to spend that money responsibly
. Signing Jose Guillen would be the equivalent of having spent that college money on beer and lottery tickets (well, the lottery tickets).
I had the same admiration for the Rangers when they signed A-Rod. OK, Hicks didn’t do a great job in the negotiation and ended up bidding against himself, but I always admire someone who takes risks in order to achieve excellence.
I guess the most amusing thing about this is how nobody ever really suggested A.J. Burnett was an Amazingly Awesome Player until the Yankees signed him.
--
Dan Szymborski
dan@baseballprimer.com
by D.Szymborski on Dec 26, 2008 10:06 PM CST reply actions 4 recs
thanks for the info/input
The cheap owners don’t irk me as much as they seem to bother you. What drives me nuts is the owners, front office execs, and fans who bitch, cry, and declare the beginning of the end for the sport because of a few big free agent signings by the Yankees.
It’s unquantifiable how much revenue the Yankees bring in to MLB, especially when they’re in powerhouse mode. Fox isn’t paying for Saturday afternoon games featuring the Rangers against the Royals.
by Randy Richardson on Dec 26, 2008 10:40 PM CST up reply actions
I agree with the bitching and crying from the owners, front office execs, etc.
but the cheap owners are also the ones that make this is a problem since they make it seem like the Yankees are doing something incredibly crazy.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
well, it is their business,
they should run it as they see fit. Now, if some owners feel that others are abusing the revenue sharing system, then they should do something about it.
by Randy Richardson on Dec 26, 2008 11:00 PM CST up reply actions
Except they are taking revenue sharing money
and using it to fill their own wallets instead of trying to make the team better. I have no problem with a rebuilding team shedding payroll since they know they aren’t going to win, but Florida has shed all arbitration players while you have a team like Pittsburgh who has been in rebuilding mode for the past decade.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Seems to me that
as long as fans (attendance, merchandise, etc) and owners (revenue sharing agreements) don’t establish consequences for the “cheap” owners, some will continue to operate as they always have.
by Randy Richardson on Dec 26, 2008 11:12 PM CST up reply actions
CBA
The players union probably doesn’t like the luxury tax and they definitely won’t approve a salary cap. The trade off. A minimum salary floor that is a 3 year running avg and an increase in the luxury tax. In return, FA compensation is reduced to only a handful of top players at each position. Just some rambling thoughts.
Mitch Moreland - Rangers 2009 Minor League Player of the Year
I expect the players union
to be talking about the drop in player salaries as a percentage of revenue at the next round of CBA talks. Some sort of mandate to spend a portion of revenue sharing on players seems appropriate.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....


















