SI Rangers Spring Training Preview
Sorry if this was already posted somewhere and I missed it, but I was looking at SI's Rangers preview and didn't quite understand some of the points it was making. In particular I hadn't heard anything about Cat being traded this spring and the article says the Rangers are lousy at catcher.
Texas Rangers
Where: Surprise, Arizona (Cactus League)
2007 record: 75-87 (4th, AL West)
New guys: Milton Bradley, Ben Broussard, Josh Hamilton, Kazuo Fukumori, Eddie Guardado, Jason Jennings
Gone guys: Jerry Hairston Jr., Victor Diaz, Akinori Otsuka, Sammy Sosa, Edinson Volquez, Brad Wilkerson
Wow, he's still here? The Rangers dumped a lot of veterans over the winter, but they retained Frank Catalanotto. The veteran lefty bat doesn't have a clear line on a job, and with the Rangers needing to make decisions on guys like Jason Botts, Nelson Cruz, and David Murphy, Catalanotto is a good candidate to end up elsewhere.
Winter grade: B. The Volquez-for-Hamilton trade was a good upside play for a team that had no good center-field option. Jennings and Bradley are nice low-investment free-agent plays, as is bringing in Fukumori, the veteran Japanese reliever. One good winter isn't going to be enough for this team, however.
NRI to watch: Catcher Taylor Teagarden is in camp following a .310/.426/.586 season split between the Cal and Texas Leagues. He's not a threat to make the team. However, follow how well he throws nearly two years removed from Tommy John surgery, and whether he's able to handle regular work behind the plate. In a system lousy with catchers, he's maybe the best of the bunch if healthy.
Job battle to track: C.J. Wilson starts the season as the closer, and his effectiveness late last year aside, his hold on the job is something shy of firm. He has the mechanics and the splits of a specialist, not a closer. Guardado lurks, and teams love giving him a shot at the job. Realistically, Joaquin Benoit or even Frank Francisco are candidates to take over at midseason.
One move to make: There's not much chance that the Rangers can hang with the Angels this season or next, so GM Jon Daniels needs to continue 2007's good work by dealing Kevin Millwood, Vicente Padilla, and even Michael Young as opportunities arise.
The Rangers will probably get out of the AL West cellar in 2008, if only because the A's will be free-falling past them on their way to 98 losses. Whether they can finish above third for the first time since 1999 depends on assembling a back end of the rotation, and how healthy a collection of injury cases can stay. A lightning strike -- like getting 1,500 PAs out of Bradley, Hamilton, and Hank Blalock while Jennings, Millwood, and Padilla all recreate their peak seasons -- could make them a contender, but in the long term, they'd be better off turning whatever good first halves they get into more prospect packages in the Mark Teixeira vein.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2008/baseball/mlb/02/18/bp.alwest/1.html
0 recs |
40 comments
Comments
What does this mean?
Am I taking this out of context or something? Or is this guy saying we don't have any good catchers?
by trident on Feb 20, 2008 10:35 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
No
by Adam J. Morris on Feb 20, 2008 10:41 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
preview loses all credibility
by OKC Ranger Fan on Feb 20, 2008 10:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A definition of lousy
by SaltyGoesYard on Feb 20, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Roger
by trident on Feb 20, 2008 10:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It is a term used in the North.
by JTodd on Feb 20, 2008 12:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
it's pronounced differently...
the ample version of 'lousy' is pronounced like 'mousy'
by RangerMoto on Feb 20, 2008 2:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No,
Watch an old black and white mob movie.
by DJCahill on Feb 20, 2008 2:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
interesting
by RangerMoto on Feb 20, 2008 9:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you're just lousy
by t ball on Feb 21, 2008 9:51 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
yep, I've never heard that before either
by OKC Ranger Fan on Feb 20, 2008 10:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
slang term...sure.
For the casual reader, it seems this would just be another reason to have a negative thought/word against the Rangers.
Is the 'lousy' usage a regional thing?
by mtex on Feb 20, 2008 10:55 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think as slang goes
by DJCahill on Feb 20, 2008 11:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep
Means "having a lot, amply supplied, or more than needed".
The Rockefellers were "lousy with money", for instance.
Clearly it's has fallen out of use in favor of "loaded", etc.
by Ed Coffin on Feb 20, 2008 12:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So
by trident on Feb 20, 2008 10:43 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Slang, I suppose
by Chase Irwin on Feb 20, 2008 10:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really slang
w/e
by Chase Irwin on Feb 20, 2008 10:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no
maybe slang in the 30's but not considered slang anymore
by ab03 on Feb 20, 2008 3:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well
by ab03 on Feb 20, 2008 3:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
-1
Well, as it turns out, M-W's dictionary resources feed into dictionary.com.
Imagine that.
by Chase Irwin on Feb 20, 2008 6:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
by LAMuscleFag on Feb 20, 2008 8:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts exactly
by t ball on Feb 20, 2008 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
As I always opinify,
by Brian Thomas on Feb 20, 2008 9:42 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this thread
by ab03 on Feb 20, 2008 10:57 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
nice
by JBImaknee on Feb 20, 2008 11:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ha ha nicely done!
by LAMuscleFag on Feb 20, 2008 12:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't feel it quite appropriate...
http://www.springtraining08.com/rangers/texas-rangers-spring-training.php
I'm working on a minor update, since some of the information has been deemed irrelevant since the start of camp (such as the projected lineup, and the inclusion of John Rheinecker into the equation), but I'm still quite pleased with how it turned out.
Granted, I'm sure it won't hold a candle to Scott Lucas's 4,600-word preview for the Hardball Times, but hey, it's something.
by jamcadbury on Feb 20, 2008 11:18 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
nice work Joey
Any chance you could write one of those for each of the other 29 teams?
by tricer on Feb 20, 2008 3:00 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks for the kind words
by jamcadbury on Feb 20, 2008 5:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What, my beautiful previews weren't enough?
by lonestarJon on Feb 20, 2008 5:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Know I've mentioned it previously at BTiA, but...
by jamcadbury on Feb 20, 2008 5:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Thanks Joey...
But again, mine where just fairly quick overviews - to write something like your article on springtraining'08 is hard enough to do for one team you're familiar with, let alone 29 more.
by lonestarJon on Feb 20, 2008 5:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OT: Danica Patrick
Am I the only one that can be completely turned on by her or completely horrified by her all at the same time?
by hillcrest on Feb 20, 2008 3:33 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
ehh
by tricer on Feb 20, 2008 4:49 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Danica Patrick
by lonestarJon on Feb 20, 2008 5:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can u say Dyke
by NYTXFAN on Feb 20, 2008 9:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 















