I'm So Excited
Looking at our starting rotation going into 2008 based on what they did in 2007:
W-L = 25/43
IP = 539
Runs = 319
ERA = 5.33
Boy, I'm so excited......pump me up sheep!
One-line diaries are prohibited on Lone Star Ball. Give your diary a bit more thought, then give it another shot. If you have nothing to add to your proposed diary, then it probably belongs as a comment under another appropriate thread.
0 recs |
33 comments
Comments
Broussard/Whiffy
by LBrooks on Feb 3, 2008 10:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Why bitch about it Brooks
by NYTXFAN on Feb 3, 2008 11:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
by lonestarJon on Feb 3, 2008 11:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
agree
by meatbonelefty on Feb 3, 2008 10:53 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Puzzled
by bflood36 on Feb 3, 2008 12:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
well
by Longhorn on Feb 3, 2008 3:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+ 1
by LAMuscleFag on Feb 3, 2008 3:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
idiot.
by Longhorn on Feb 3, 2008 12:14 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sounds like Brooksie
by B_Black on Feb 3, 2008 12:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Brooksy excited???
That can't be! Well we all know what happens when Brooksy gets excited. You better change those depends before the shit leaks through!
by LAMuscleFag on Feb 3, 2008 1:02 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Lbrooks ......................Shittin' his pants
by mrpman on Feb 3, 2008 1:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
diaper dandy?
LOL very funny mr p!
by LAMuscleFag on Feb 3, 2008 1:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Misinterpreted?
Pretty clear the last sentence was directed at someone else. LBrooks is excited because "he"'s ovulating, and "he"'s getting ready to spread it for "his" pet sheep "Hammertime". Why sheep though LBrooks? Aren't their arms too short to do a reach-around?
by Rangerchick on Feb 3, 2008 4:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LOL
by LAMuscleFag on Feb 3, 2008 6:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think you're on to something there Rangerchick
by mrpman on Feb 3, 2008 7:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ummm Math please
Padilla 6-10
Gabbard 6-1
McCarthy 5-10
Jennings 2-9
Total: 29-44
And most of these guys didn't even pitch a full season. So if you factor in the reported shape of these guys during the offseason and a little faith I would say for Rangers standards we have some reason for a little excitement.
by RangerMack on Feb 3, 2008 1:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
question
you must be an angels fan in disguise...
by knockoutking24 on Feb 3, 2008 1:42 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Most likely he's like other Dallas fans
Exhibit A -> Mavs fans pre-2000/post-2000
by Taylor on Feb 3, 2008 5:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
why is this diary-worthy?
by willamos2 on Feb 3, 2008 2:51 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Before you reply
Why am I taking the bait?
by hightowersmith on Feb 3, 2008 3:00 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Severe anal leakage
by Brian Thomas on Feb 3, 2008 3:12 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
I for one thought this was a well thought out
by BlackGloveRighty on Feb 3, 2008 4:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Sorry you have to read shit like this...
by slc ranger on Feb 3, 2008 10:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Shit like what?
by SwiperNoSwiping on Feb 3, 2008 10:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That rotation in 2006
Padilla 15-10, 4.50 ERA
McCarthy 4-7, 4.68 ERA
Jennings 9-13, 3.78 ERA
Gabbard 1-3, 3.51 ERA
and
Tejeda 5-5, 4.28 ERA
Overall that's a 4.28 ERA
Will this group be able to return to that form in 2008. I wouldn't wager on it. However, they are likely to be closer to those numbers than their combined 2007 numbers with any luck at all. If healthy (yes, I realize that's a big if), this could be an above average rotation. No horse at the top, but 4 potential solid 2/3 type starters. The White Sox rode that to a WS title a few years ago.
We aren't on that path of course, but this rotation isn't anywhere as bad as it looked last year.
by badradiorules on Feb 3, 2008 10:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well...
For Swiper, I was actually referring to all the negative bs that LBrooks always posts though.
by slc ranger on Feb 3, 2008 10:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not Nearly......
Who, BTW, was the best pitcher on this team last year and had much better numbers than yourself.
by LBrooks on Feb 4, 2008 2:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
LBrooks = 13-year-old girl looking for attention
by ghtd36 on Feb 3, 2008 4:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 
















