Signifigance of Nolan Hire
Weigh in on your opinion.
One-line diaries are prohibited on Lone Star Ball. Give your diary a bit more thought, then give it another shot. If you have nothing to add to your proposed diary, then it probably belongs as a comment under another appropriate thread.
The minimum is 300 characters.
0 recs |
28 comments
Comments
penalty box
by mtex on Feb 6, 2008 12:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Actively involved..
he's too smart not to be. Change in ownership? Yeh like that's going to happen, we're stuck with that pocket lining oaf for quite a while.
by LAMuscleFag on Feb 6, 2008 12:06 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Well......
by LBrooks on Feb 6, 2008 12:22 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
That
by hubcityraider on Feb 6, 2008 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you're such an idiot
by cgolden on Feb 6, 2008 1:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So..
I dunno. Sounds kinda...illegal?
by WyoRanger on Feb 6, 2008 1:38 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Signifigance?
by txranger7 on Feb 6, 2008 12:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
One-line diaries are prohibited on Lone Star Ball
by JBImaknee on Feb 6, 2008 12:39 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Ryan Sucks
by Agreen07 on Feb 6, 2008 12:52 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
you're such a jackass
by cgolden on Feb 6, 2008 12:55 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Lets change this diary
by NYTXFAN on Feb 6, 2008 1:27 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
by Agreen07 on Feb 6, 2008 1:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nah
I want one of Ben Sheets or CC Sabathia (or possibly AJ Burnett if those guys are unavailable), plus one of Adam Dunn or Pat Burell.
by thedirkatron on Feb 6, 2008 2:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Concur...
by slc ranger on Feb 6, 2008 5:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Por que?
He'd give us some nice right-handed power to plug in between Hobbs and Blalock, and he can actually play a little defense in LF or at 1b, two positions of need for us. (Or, well at least he's not a nexus of suck in the field like Dunn.)
If you don't like Burrell, who do you like out of next year's possible FA's?
Most of the good guys on that list have options that are going to be picked up (Thome, Man-Ram, Crawford), or are long shots to even consider signing here (Chipper).
by thedirkatron on Feb 6, 2008 8:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Ooops
I think Dunn will age horribly. Really horribly.
I wouldn't be angry if we went out and got us some Dunn next off season, but my enthusiasm would be subdued if we had to go beyond 4 years to sign him, which we almost certainly would.
by thedirkatron on Feb 6, 2008 8:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The only...
I wouldn't be upset if the Rangers went after Burrell. His numbers are pretty good but he is 3 years older than Dunn and I believe his #'s will start to decline after next year. He would be second on my list behind Dunn.
by slc ranger on Feb 6, 2008 8:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Dunn vs. Burrell
Burrell isn't shabby either, but as slc points out, he's older, and has only hit over 35 homers once, and that was waaaayy back in 2002. The last 3 years he's hit 32, 29, and 30 homers.
The main difference between Burrell and Dunn is Pat's career AVG. (.258) is 10 points higher than Dunns (.248). But Dunn actually has a higher career OBP (.381 to Burrell's .367), and he also has a .519 career SLG% to Burrell's .482.
Bottom line, Dunn is younger and has a lot more power, and that makes him the better player, even though Burrell hits for a slighty higher AVG, and strikes out a little less. From what I've heard, Burrell isn't that much better than Dunn on defense, and irregardless, if we do sign one of those two, they're gonna be the DH, not the first baseman or LF. So Dunn is the guy I want - and with our ballpark, he'd probably LOVE to come and take aim at the RF porch. How sweet would that be to watch?
by lonestarJon on Feb 6, 2008 8:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, if we sign Dunn
But I must respectfully maintain that his body scares the crap out of me, that he sucks to an unbelievable degree in the field, and that TTO guys rarely age well.
(Though Burrell is pretty TTO himself.)
by thedirkatron on Feb 6, 2008 10:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not when we have the shutdown closer BGL
by cgolden on Feb 6, 2008 2:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm not 100% sold
I think CJ deserves every chance to close this year until he either proves he's not the guy, or they decide they want to give him a shot at the rotation.
by t ball on Feb 6, 2008 3:06 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
+1
There should be nothing stopping us from acquiring one of those pitchers Dirk mentioned and at least one of Dunn/Burell. Hell, Id love to see us be very active next year. Seeing how there will be a better F.A. class we could possibly fill more holes through trades.
by NYTXFAN on Feb 6, 2008 4:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Meant to say trades should be less expensive
by NYTXFAN on Feb 6, 2008 4:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
K-Rod is overrated
No, we don't need a superstar closer. Just somebody that can consistently get 3 outs in the 9th inning without giving up any runs. And I think CJ Wilson and Joaquin Benoit can both do that just as good as the almighty "K-Rod" - and for less money, too.
by lonestarJon on Feb 6, 2008 7:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
With that said...
If Tom Hicks will just get me Adam Dunn, I will never say another thing about him being a cheapskate.
by lonestarJon on Feb 6, 2008 7:22 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Nolan was just on Galloway
said the org. has shifted from a hitter's paradise to trying to develop young pitching, and agrees with that strategy (duh).
the one interesting tidbit - when asked if partial ownership is in the works, he said not at this time, but once everything gets settled they will certainly begin talks... it sounded like it's close to a sure thing.
Galloway seems to think the eventual owners of the Texas Rangers will be Nolan Ryan and George W. Bush.
by disposablehero on Feb 6, 2008 4:46 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 















