LSB announcement -- search function upgraded

by Adam J. Morris on May 12, 2008 10:00 AM CDT

You may have noticed that the search function that we've had for SBN 2.0 has kinda blown.

Not anymore. The search function has been upgraded, and I think you'll find it much better.

To try it out, plug something into the search bar on the upper right hand side of the page, and click away.

0 recs | Comment 12 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

wow

That’s great. The bad thing is that it’s going to be really easy to someone to find all the things that you have said in the past that look really dumb now. For example, I just did a search on Kinsler and Utley and found about ten different posts from some pretty smart posters saying that Kinsler would be better than Utley, It would not be wise to trade Kinsler for Utley, etc etc.

"You’re the only here who contributes schtick only." - brettgardner

by trza on May 12, 2008 10:12 AM CDT 0 recs

Yah

We’re all gonna be accountable as fuck now.

"If we where [sic] gonna trade them Salty, I would want a helluva lot more than just Joba though." -lonestarJon

by thedirkatron on May 12, 2008 10:34 AM CDT up 0 recs

thedirkatron fuck

turns up 17 hits.

I will escape some accountability because it’s more difficult to search a username with a space in it…you get every post that has the letter t or ball in it, which is more than a couple. All part of my obfuscation master plan.

...and curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid git.

by t ball on May 12, 2008 2:52 PM CDT up 0 recs

actually....

anyone can click on your name (right here in this comment) and use the search field on your profile to search everything you’ve posted

and/or

use the ‘power search’ option on the main search page to filter by user name

I'm one of the guys that built the new SB Nation

by clockwerks on May 12, 2008 3:00 PM CDT up 0 recs

shhhhhhh

thanks a lot.

...and curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid git.

by t ball on May 12, 2008 4:10 PM CDT up 0 recs

Great feature

“Ben Broussard sucks” only has one hit, who would have thought?

Picking a random blog comment and wielding it as a club to bash "blogs" is like picking a random romance novel off an airport bookstore shelf and saying, "This book sucks. Fuck you, Tolstoy -- your medium is worthless!" - Ken Tremendous

by TheBZA on May 12, 2008 10:30 AM CDT 0 recs

Fewer than I expected

Miles + Bang = 18 comments
Sharky + Duff = 103 comments

Miles has almost 9,000 comments; Sharky has almost 5,300

It's baseball. You don't always get what you want, and you don't always want what you get. --Ed Coffin

by txranger7 on May 12, 2008 10:36 AM CDT 0 recs

Pssh

That’s nothing.

“lonestarJon + Salty” turns up 234 comments.

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 13, 2008 7:27 AM CDT up 0 recs

However

“lonestarJon + Laird sucks” turns up only 18 comments.

So, in conclusion, yes, I talk about Salty way too much, but I actually have not said that much about Laird.

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 13, 2008 7:29 AM CDT up 0 recs

Awesome

thanks.

"I hope it's a special dumb person hell so that I don’t have to meet up with you after I die."

- The D-tron

by Chase Irwin on May 12, 2008 10:53 AM CDT 0 recs

Malfunction?

agreen07 & creepy returned zero results…

...it's the weekend, so why the hell not?

by Rodney on May 12, 2008 2:59 PM CDT 0 recs

Try pairing him with "Ghost" or "Dirty Dancing" or "Patrick Swayze, you had me at hello"

Hits a’plenty…

"For the record, I did not and do not like the Volquez trade, even though Hamilton is awesome and our best player and I think he’s going to be one of the best players in baseball." philikid3

by Brian Thomas on May 13, 2008 1:12 PM CDT up 0 recs