New DMN Rangers newsletter up
Evan Grant has a new Rangers newsletter up, which leads off with a lengthy discussion of the offense's approach at the plate and the way working counts and being patient has been paying off...
There's also some talk about the Rangers' physical conditioning, and the masochistic tendencies of Rangers fans that includes obsessing over those who were once here...
Some good stuff...check it out...
68
comments
Comments
OT but not fanpost worthy...
over at minorleagueball, there’s a fanpost with some good pics from the High Desert/Bakersfield game from this past weekend… Tommy Hunter is a big person. Didn’t realize they played in an antique of a ballpark.
"But the major difference is where Showalter tried to overthink everything Washington at times seems like he isn't thinking at all. " - rentz
by hillcrest on May 15, 2008 2:15 PM CDT 0 recs
Thanks for the link.
Great photos.
Looks like there’s been a lot of talent roll through Bakersfield over the years.
And Tommy Hunter is indeed a large human being.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 2:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Hunter reminds me of...
Ponssons little brother. Huge tree trunk like legs.
by laxtonto on
May 15, 2008 3:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Bradley's a Baaad Man!
I didn’t realize this number:
He began Tuesday with a .999 career OPS for nearly 400 plate appearances as a cleanup guy. That ranks seventh among 89 active players with at least 300 plate appearances in the role. By comparison, Albert Pujols (.989) ranks eighth, Ryan Howard (.975) 13th, Mark Teixeira (.894) 33rd and Hank Blalock (.747) 87th.
...it's the weekend, so why the hell not?
by Rodney on May 15, 2008 3:08 PM CDT 0 recs
This really tears me up.
Bradley is a big-time injury risk, but to think that we signed him for $5.2M and we’re getting that kind of production…it really makes me want the Rangers to sign him to a long-term deal.
Do you think he’d go for a contract heavily weighted on the number of plate appearances he makes, sorta like we did with Sosa last year?
by jwiscarson on
May 15, 2008 3:19 PM CDT
up
0 recs
No I don't think he would...
...because I don’t think he would have to. I believe if he gets through this season relatively healthy and productive that he will have 10 times the leverage that Sosa had when he signed with Texas.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:22 PM CDT 0 recs
Crap...
...didn’t hit the reply button. Obviously that post was in response to jwiscarson.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 3:23 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Good point.
That’s really obvious, but it never occurred to me that he’d get better offers elsewhere if he continues to rake at this pace, and out-OPS Albert effing Pujols.
by jwiscarson on
May 15, 2008 3:43 PM CDT
up
0 recs
All that
credit goes to Washington..
Where are all the haters now?
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on May 15, 2008 3:23 PM CDT 0 recs
I'm right here...
...I see nothing in the recent turnaround that shakes me from my belief that RW is a fool masquerading as a person not quite as foolish as he really is.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 3:24 PM CDT
up
0 recs
So when
the players play bad, you blame everything on the manager. And when the team does good, you give all the credit to the players?
That is kind of a unfair judgment.
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on
May 15, 2008 3:27 PM CDT
up
0 recs
so when
you pinch hit byrd for vasquez (who is hot right now) with bases loaded and hits into a double play who else do you blame?
"HELLO WIN COLUMN"
by dmurphnextrusygreer on
May 15, 2008 3:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
So when
Wilson comes in on a save situation, and he blows it.
Who do yall blame?
Thats right, yall blame Washinton.
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on
May 15, 2008 3:31 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I still don't understand...
...why lifting Vazquez, who can’t hit LHPs to save his life, against Arthur Rhodes is a mistake…
by Adam J. Morris on
May 15, 2008 3:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
+1
Byrd sucks so maybe Duran should have batted instead but lifting Vazquez was a defensible move.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 3:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
seasons stats vs, lhp this year
byrd-
2-13
1 double
1 triple
1 walk
3 k
0 rbi
vasquez
2-8
1 rbi
2 walk
2 k
"HELLO WIN COLUMN"
by dmurphnextrusygreer on
May 15, 2008 3:44 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Thats
alot of sample size to compare with..
Fail.
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on
May 15, 2008 3:48 PM CDT
up
0 recs
whatever
it still was a mistake
"HELLO WIN COLUMN"
by dmurphnextrusygreer on
May 15, 2008 3:51 PM CDT
up
0 recs
-1
wrong, fail, lose.
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on
May 15, 2008 3:52 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The outcome
was a failure but the decision to pinch hit for a LH with a RH against a LHP was sound.
by jparks77 on
May 15, 2008 3:58 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Lifetime LHP stats
Byrd, 533 PAs: .278/.343/.414
Vazquez, 356 PAs: .197/.255/.232
by jwiscarson on
May 15, 2008 3:53 PM CDT
up
0 recs
+1
Vazquez has a long track record of failure vs. lefties.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 3:54 PM CDT
up
0 recs
chalk it up as a loss
"HELLO WIN COLUMN"
by dmurphnextrusygreer on
May 15, 2008 3:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
RW
for manager of the year
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on
May 15, 2008 3:57 PM CDT
up
0 recs
a little
premature i would say joe maddon at this point
"Hey, I think it's easy for guys to hit .300 and stay in the big leagues. Hit .200 and try to stick around as long as I did; I think it's a much greater accomplishment. That's hard."-- Bob Uecker
by dmurphnextrusygreer on
May 15, 2008 4:09 PM CDT
up
0 recs
But why pinch hit Byrd...
...who hadn’t seen one single ML pitch in over a month? Then, on top of that, have to pull Byrd to put in Duran because Byrd can’t play 3B? Series of stupid, stupid, stupid decisions. I’m not saying Wash is dumb, but boy did he act like it yesterday.
by FuturePants on
May 15, 2008 4:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Agreed...
...that’s why I think Duran was the better choice. Especially since he was going to have to replace Vazquez at 3rd.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 4:25 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Duran
He’s been terrible this year. Now, so has Byrd…but at this point, I have a hard time believing that having Duran hit instead of Byrd is really that good a move.
by Adam J. Morris on
May 15, 2008 6:58 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Ron should have pinch hit your boy Gerald
He’s at least been hot lately, can hit lefties, and actually got a hit pinch-hitting for Catalanotto the next inning.
I realize Ron was playing the percentages, but pinch-hitting Marlon Byrd, who has not seen ML pitching in nearly a month, and was hitting horribly before he went on the DL, in the biggest spot in the ballgame was stupid.
Even dumber was having Chris Shelton bunt late in the game for the third day in a row. He played right into the M’s hands.
A Lonestar in California - 2.0
David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.
by lonestarJon on
May 15, 2008 7:02 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Pinch hitting Laird...
means you have to then either pull Salty from the game or Laird and put in Duran.
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on
May 15, 2008 7:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
What?
Why? They pinch-hit Byrd, and he’s not a third baseman. They pinch-hit Laird the very next inning anyway.
You’re not making sense (what else is new).
A Lonestar in California - 2.0
David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.
by lonestarJon on
May 15, 2008 7:15 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Why?
Because Laird and Salty are the catchers. If you pinch hit one of them for a third baseman, one of them is going to need to come out of the game for a defensive replacement at third. We carry more players capable of playing OF than catcher.
Are you cranky today, jon? Miss your nap?
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on
May 15, 2008 7:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
¿why? ¿why?
because RW is a jackass!
¡yo soy Horsedooty!
I soloed in the mile high club.
by Sr Horsedooty on
May 15, 2008 7:20 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Dude
Chris Shelton was in the came. He is the third/emergency catcher, and the chances he would have been needed are miniscule. There’s no reason they couldn’t have pinch hit Laird.
A Lonestar in California - 2.0
David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.
by lonestarJon on
May 15, 2008 7:22 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Heh
Ahh, the typos that happen when you type too fast…
A Lonestar in California - 2.0
David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.
by lonestarJon on
May 15, 2008 7:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I'm sorry...
I don’t see a compelling reason to pinch hit Laird instead of Byrd at that time. As the home team, I don’t have any problem holding Laird as a potential right-handed bench bat later in the game.
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on
May 15, 2008 7:27 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Again
Byrd had just come off the DL, had not seen ML pitching in over a month, and was sucking it up before he went on the DL.
He was a horrible choice to pinch hit in the biggest spot in the game, Ron simply used him because he likes him, and has a preception that he is “clutch” based on his performance from last season. It was a bad decision in my opinion.
But that’s all I have to say. I don’t feel like a long, drawn-out debate with somebody as impossible as you. The floor is yours…
A Lonestar in California - 2.0
David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.
by lonestarJon on
May 15, 2008 7:34 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The spot...
where Laird was pinch hit was the bigger spot in the game, IMO.
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on
May 15, 2008 7:41 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I don't see...
....that the “hasn’t seen ML pitching in a month” argument holds much water when the guy has had 18 plate appearances over 4 days in AAA.
He’s a bench player. If he isn’t capable of coming in and pinch hitting against a LHP, he shouldn’t have been activated.
by Adam J. Morris on
May 15, 2008 7:54 PM CDT
up
0 recs
18 PA's AAA
Seriously AJM? You’re arguing that a guy is ready to come in, and pinch-hit in a clutch situation after being out a month (after sucking before that), because he had 18 PA’s with OKC?
C’mon, man…
A Lonestar in California - 2.0
David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.
by lonestarJon on
May 15, 2008 7:57 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Then don't activate him
If you aren’t ready for him to come in off the bench and PH for Ramon Vazquez in a situation like that, then don’t activate him.
Because in that case, you are saying he isn’t ready to play yet. And if that’s the case, he should have stayed in Oklahoma for more rehab.
Now, generally speaking, positional players only play a few rehab games - 2, 3, 4, something like that - before they are activated anyway. And they generally get put right back in the lineup when they are activated.
So, no, I don’t think the argument that he shouldn’t have been used because he’d been on the d.l. and had “only” 18 AAA plate appearances holds water.
by Adam J. Morris on
May 15, 2008 8:22 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Byrd
Has made 5 pinch-hit appearances this year. He is 0-4 with a HBP.
Even if what you’re saying is true (and we already know theres a huge difference between AAA and ML pitching) Byrd hasn’t been a good pinch hitter this year anyway.
Either way, I still think it was a bad decision.
A Lonestar in California - 2.0
David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.
by lonestarJon on
May 15, 2008 8:39 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Do you really think...
...how Byrd has performed in pinch hitting opportunities this season is relevant? For his career, he has an 867 PH OPS…isn’t that more relevant than being 0 for 4 this year?
And yes, there is a difference between AAA and major league pitching…but still, he’s faced live pitching, and the whole point of a rehab assignment is for a player to get his timing back.
People acting like having Byrd PH for Vazquez is a horrible move that only an idiot would make is bizarre, to me.
by Adam J. Morris on
May 15, 2008 8:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
No but when players play better...
...and win more games then when they were playing worse I don’t give credit to the manager who is just as stupid today as he was three weeks ago.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 3:39 PM CDT
up
0 recs
THAN, THAN, THAN...
...honestly I know the difference between “than” and “then”. Honestly, I do.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 3:46 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I love the fact this team is 2nd AL in OBP
That’s what I like to see from my team.
Picking a random blog comment and wielding it as a club to bash "blogs" is like picking a random romance novel off an airport bookstore shelf and saying, "This book sucks. Fuck you, Tolstoy -- your medium is worthless!" - Ken Tremendous
by TheBZA on May 15, 2008 4:06 PM CDT 0 recs
Hmmm...
I wonder who we should give that credit to…
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on
May 15, 2008 4:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Ummmm..........
Rudy Jaramillo
I kid, I kid
Danks, Volquez, Galarraga and Young are GONE! GET OVER IT! Endless whining will not bring them back!
by LBBRangerFan on
May 15, 2008 4:16 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I don't
even know if Rudy knows what “OBP” means…
Say your sorry to Ron Washington
by miles on
May 15, 2008 4:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
AL ranks in OBP under RJ's tutelage...
95 10th
96 5th
97 9th
98 2nd
99 3rd
00 6th
01 4th
02 6th
03 8th
04 11th
05 6th
06 9th
07 11th
08 2nd (so far)
Not great rankings under Rudy but better than I expected before I looked it up.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 4:23 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Hmmm...
5th in ‘96
2nd in ‘98
3rd in ‘99
Coincidence?
by Topgun22 on
May 15, 2008 4:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Not in my opinion...
...those teams had some nice OBP guys like Greer, Clark, McLemore, Palmeiro, Tettleton, etc.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 4:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Playoffs...
I was referring to the fact that three of teams four highest OBP ranks came in the years that they made the playoffs.
by Topgun22 on
May 15, 2008 4:43 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Me too...
...I was trying to support your point by saying that those teams had good OBP guys which had a lot more to do with their success than any “chemistry” or “leadership” or warm, wholesome “veteran-ness”.
Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.
by Chad Crudup on
May 15, 2008 4:50 PM CDT
up
0 recs
'04 numbers
Really interesting that we were 11th in ‘04, but posted an 89-73 record.
by jwiscarson on
May 15, 2008 5:03 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Working the Count
I am NOT a fan of Washington but I don’t know who to give the credit to other than him. Possibly Daniels for putting the team together, I guess. But it seems like the players are consciously taking pitches. It doesn’t always lead to the best outcome in any particular AB, but over the course of a game and series it sure pays to wear the other teams’ pitching staffs out. Especially if they come in here from New York or Oakland where they’ve already been tortured for three or four games.
I think if you can field a lineup with guys who are genuinely difficult to get out, you’re going to do well even if those guys aren’t as talented and don’t generally put up big fat numbers. OBP isn’t as important a stat as pitches seen per AB, in my opinion. A baseball season is a war of attrition, and the team that goes up there and lets the hittable ball be called a ball and fouls off a lot of pitches is kind of like a disciplined guerrilla force. Very difficult to contend with in the long haul.
by Black Francis on May 15, 2008 5:20 PM CDT 0 recs
Combination
Daniels and Wash. Daniels got better OBP guys, like Bradley, other guys gradually get with the program, the team gets higher OBP. We still don’t really know what this team is, though. Too many injuries and short spans of good and bad luck with their replacements. Still could win anywhere from 70-90 games I think.
...and curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid git.
by t ball on
May 15, 2008 8:00 PM CDT
up
0 recs
yeah
sorry about that, that guy still ticks me off.
by SanDiegoKev on
May 16, 2008 12:04 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I enjoy seeing them playing in the old uniform
as they did in that Sunday Oakland game recently, I noticed that the particular Senators uniform they were wearing looks very simialr to the Nationals current uniform. The hats look the same. You would wonder about trademark and those issues. Hicks still owns the “Senators” etc.
I think when the team left Washtingon, MLB had a responsibilty to make them give up all trademarks and logos to do with the Senators. It’s bad enough they left, without ripping off and taking everything attached to the team with them. For example, in Football when the Browns left Cleveland, the name stayed behind, etc.
by SanDiegoKev on
May 16, 2008 12:16 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Leaving the old identity behind
Most of the time, they don’t. See Utah Jazz, New Orleans Hornets, LA Lakers, St. Louis Rams, etc.
I agree that it would make sense to shed the old name/identity when it makes little sense in the new location (e.g., Utah Jazz), but even then it is rare for the rights to be relinquished without some compensation to the owner.
by mgb5 on
May 16, 2008 3:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Beginning...
of “Basketball” talking about teams that moved and kept their names. Cracks me up.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates
by slc ranger on
May 16, 2008 3:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
So, the name Nats could be in Litigation
It was commnly used to describe those Washington Senator Teams in the local papers, maybe even preferred. Example, Washington Post headline would read for a Sunday Doubleheader (they had them most sundays when team was playing at home): “Nats swatted in Doubleheader.”
so, now look at Senator uniform used by Rangers that Sunday in Oakland:
compared to nationals uniform today:
hat looks the same, who owns the design?


by SanDiegoKev on
May 16, 2008 4:58 PM CDT
up
0 recs









