Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:





New DMN Rangers newsletter up

Evan Grant has a new Rangers newsletter up, which leads off with a lengthy discussion of the offense's approach at the plate and the way working counts and being patient has been paying off...

There's also some talk about the Rangers' physical conditioning, and the masochistic tendencies of Rangers fans that includes obsessing over those who were once here...

Some good stuff...check it out...

0 recs | Comment 68 comments

Story-email Email | Print |

Comments

Display:

OT but not fanpost worthy...

over at minorleagueball, there’s a fanpost with some good pics from the High Desert/Bakersfield game from this past weekend… Tommy Hunter is a big person. Didn’t realize they played in an antique of a ballpark.

"But the major difference is where Showalter tried to overthink everything Washington at times seems like he isn't thinking at all. " - rentz

by hillcrest on May 15, 2008 2:15 PM CDT   0 recs

Thanks for the link.

Great photos.

Looks like there’s been a lot of talent roll through Bakersfield over the years.

And Tommy Hunter is indeed a large human being.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 2:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Hunter reminds me of...

Ponssons little brother. Huge tree trunk like legs.

by laxtonto on May 15, 2008 3:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Bradley's a Baaad Man!

I didn’t realize this number:

He began Tuesday with a .999 career OPS for nearly 400 plate appearances as a cleanup guy. That ranks seventh among 89 active players with at least 300 plate appearances in the role. By comparison, Albert Pujols (.989) ranks eighth, Ryan Howard (.975) 13th, Mark Teixeira (.894) 33rd and Hank Blalock (.747) 87th.

...it's the weekend, so why the hell not?

by Rodney on May 15, 2008 3:08 PM CDT   0 recs

This really tears me up.

Bradley is a big-time injury risk, but to think that we signed him for $5.2M and we’re getting that kind of production…it really makes me want the Rangers to sign him to a long-term deal.

Do you think he’d go for a contract heavily weighted on the number of plate appearances he makes, sorta like we did with Sosa last year?

by jwiscarson on May 15, 2008 3:19 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

No I don't think he would...

...because I don’t think he would have to. I believe if he gets through this season relatively healthy and productive that he will have 10 times the leverage that Sosa had when he signed with Texas.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:22 PM CDT   0 recs

Crap...

...didn’t hit the reply button. Obviously that post was in response to jwiscarson.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:23 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Good point.

That’s really obvious, but it never occurred to me that he’d get better offers elsewhere if he continues to rake at this pace, and out-OPS Albert effing Pujols.

by jwiscarson on May 15, 2008 3:43 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

All that

credit goes to Washington..

Where are all the haters now?

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 3:23 PM CDT   0 recs

I'm right here...

...I see nothing in the recent turnaround that shakes me from my belief that RW is a fool masquerading as a person not quite as foolish as he really is.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:24 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

So when

the players play bad, you blame everything on the manager. And when the team does good, you give all the credit to the players?

That is kind of a unfair judgment.

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 3:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

so when

you pinch hit byrd for vasquez (who is hot right now) with bases loaded and hits into a double play who else do you blame?

"HELLO WIN COLUMN"

by dmurphnextrusygreer on May 15, 2008 3:29 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

So when

Wilson comes in on a save situation, and he blows it.

Who do yall blame?

Thats right, yall blame Washinton.

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 3:31 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I still don't understand...

...why lifting Vazquez, who can’t hit LHPs to save his life, against Arthur Rhodes is a mistake…

by Adam J. Morris on May 15, 2008 3:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

+1

Byrd sucks so maybe Duran should have batted instead but lifting Vazquez was a defensible move.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:38 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

seasons stats vs, lhp this year

byrd-
2-13
1 double
1 triple
1 walk
3 k
0 rbi

vasquez
2-8
1 rbi
2 walk
2 k

"HELLO WIN COLUMN"

by dmurphnextrusygreer on May 15, 2008 3:44 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Thats

alot of sample size to compare with..

Fail.

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 3:48 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

whatever

it still was a mistake

"HELLO WIN COLUMN"

by dmurphnextrusygreer on May 15, 2008 3:51 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

-1

wrong, fail, lose.

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 3:52 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The outcome

was a failure but the decision to pinch hit for a LH with a RH against a LHP was sound.

by jparks77 on May 15, 2008 3:58 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Lifetime LHP stats

Byrd, 533 PAs: .278/.343/.414
Vazquez, 356 PAs: .197/.255/.232

by jwiscarson on May 15, 2008 3:53 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

+1

Vazquez has a long track record of failure vs. lefties.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:54 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

RW

for manager of the year

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 3:57 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

a little

premature i would say joe maddon at this point

"Hey, I think it's easy for guys to hit .300 and stay in the big leagues. Hit .200 and try to stick around as long as I did; I think it's a much greater accomplishment. That's hard."-- Bob Uecker

by dmurphnextrusygreer on May 15, 2008 4:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

But why pinch hit Byrd...

...who hadn’t seen one single ML pitch in over a month? Then, on top of that, have to pull Byrd to put in Duran because Byrd can’t play 3B? Series of stupid, stupid, stupid decisions. I’m not saying Wash is dumb, but boy did he act like it yesterday.

by FuturePants on May 15, 2008 4:12 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed...

...that’s why I think Duran was the better choice. Especially since he was going to have to replace Vazquez at 3rd.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 4:25 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Duran

He’s been terrible this year. Now, so has Byrd…but at this point, I have a hard time believing that having Duran hit instead of Byrd is really that good a move.

by Adam J. Morris on May 15, 2008 6:58 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Ron should have pinch hit your boy Gerald

He’s at least been hot lately, can hit lefties, and actually got a hit pinch-hitting for Catalanotto the next inning.

I realize Ron was playing the percentages, but pinch-hitting Marlon Byrd, who has not seen ML pitching in nearly a month, and was hitting horribly before he went on the DL, in the biggest spot in the ballgame was stupid.

Even dumber was having Chris Shelton bunt late in the game for the third day in a row. He played right into the M’s hands.

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 15, 2008 7:02 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Pinch hitting Laird...

means you have to then either pull Salty from the game or Laird and put in Duran.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on May 15, 2008 7:07 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

What?

Why? They pinch-hit Byrd, and he’s not a third baseman. They pinch-hit Laird the very next inning anyway.

You’re not making sense (what else is new).

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 15, 2008 7:15 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Why?

Because Laird and Salty are the catchers. If you pinch hit one of them for a third baseman, one of them is going to need to come out of the game for a defensive replacement at third. We carry more players capable of playing OF than catcher.

Are you cranky today, jon? Miss your nap?

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on May 15, 2008 7:18 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

¿why? ¿why?

because RW is a jackass!

¡yo soy Horsedooty!

I soloed in the mile high club.

by Sr Horsedooty on May 15, 2008 7:20 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Dude

Chris Shelton was in the came. He is the third/emergency catcher, and the chances he would have been needed are miniscule. There’s no reason they couldn’t have pinch hit Laird.

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 15, 2008 7:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Excellent

“Chris Shelton was in the came”

Sorry, I’m 12 years old.

by jparks77 on May 15, 2008 7:24 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Heh

Ahh, the typos that happen when you type too fast…

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 15, 2008 7:26 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'm sorry...

I don’t see a compelling reason to pinch hit Laird instead of Byrd at that time. As the home team, I don’t have any problem holding Laird as a potential right-handed bench bat later in the game.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on May 15, 2008 7:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Again

Byrd had just come off the DL, had not seen ML pitching in over a month, and was sucking it up before he went on the DL.

He was a horrible choice to pinch hit in the biggest spot in the game, Ron simply used him because he likes him, and has a preception that he is “clutch” based on his performance from last season. It was a bad decision in my opinion.

But that’s all I have to say. I don’t feel like a long, drawn-out debate with somebody as impossible as you. The floor is yours…

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 15, 2008 7:34 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The spot...

where Laird was pinch hit was the bigger spot in the game, IMO.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on May 15, 2008 7:41 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't see...

....that the “hasn’t seen ML pitching in a month” argument holds much water when the guy has had 18 plate appearances over 4 days in AAA.

He’s a bench player. If he isn’t capable of coming in and pinch hitting against a LHP, he shouldn’t have been activated.

by Adam J. Morris on May 15, 2008 7:54 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

18 PA's AAA

Seriously AJM? You’re arguing that a guy is ready to come in, and pinch-hit in a clutch situation after being out a month (after sucking before that), because he had 18 PA’s with OKC?

C’mon, man…

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 15, 2008 7:57 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Then don't activate him

If you aren’t ready for him to come in off the bench and PH for Ramon Vazquez in a situation like that, then don’t activate him.

Because in that case, you are saying he isn’t ready to play yet. And if that’s the case, he should have stayed in Oklahoma for more rehab.

Now, generally speaking, positional players only play a few rehab games - 2, 3, 4, something like that - before they are activated anyway. And they generally get put right back in the lineup when they are activated.

So, no, I don’t think the argument that he shouldn’t have been used because he’d been on the d.l. and had “only” 18 AAA plate appearances holds water.

by Adam J. Morris on May 15, 2008 8:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Byrd

Has made 5 pinch-hit appearances this year. He is 0-4 with a HBP.

Even if what you’re saying is true (and we already know theres a huge difference between AAA and ML pitching) Byrd hasn’t been a good pinch hitter this year anyway.

Either way, I still think it was a bad decision.

A Lonestar in California - 2.0

David Murphy rocks, so Ellsbury can just go get himself a taco or something.

by lonestarJon on May 15, 2008 8:39 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Do you really think...

...how Byrd has performed in pinch hitting opportunities this season is relevant? For his career, he has an 867 PH OPS…isn’t that more relevant than being 0 for 4 this year?

And yes, there is a difference between AAA and major league pitching…but still, he’s faced live pitching, and the whole point of a rehab assignment is for a player to get his timing back.

People acting like having Byrd PH for Vazquez is a horrible move that only an idiot would make is bizarre, to me.

by Adam J. Morris on May 15, 2008 8:46 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

No but when players play better...

...and win more games then when they were playing worse I don’t give credit to the manager who is just as stupid today as he was three weeks ago.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:39 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

THAN, THAN, THAN...

...honestly I know the difference between “than” and “then”. Honestly, I do.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 3:46 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I love the fact this team is 2nd AL in OBP

That’s what I like to see from my team.

Picking a random blog comment and wielding it as a club to bash "blogs" is like picking a random romance novel off an airport bookstore shelf and saying, "This book sucks. Fuck you, Tolstoy -- your medium is worthless!" - Ken Tremendous

by TheBZA on May 15, 2008 4:06 PM CDT   0 recs

Hmmm...

I wonder who we should give that credit to…

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 4:12 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Ummmm..........

Rudy Jaramillo

I kid, I kid

Danks, Volquez, Galarraga and Young are GONE! GET OVER IT! Endless whining will not bring them back!

by LBBRangerFan on May 15, 2008 4:16 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't

even know if Rudy knows what “OBP” means…

Say your sorry to Ron Washington

by miles on May 15, 2008 4:18 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

AL ranks in OBP under RJ's tutelage...

95 10th
96 5th
97 9th
98 2nd
99 3rd
00 6th
01 4th
02 6th
03 8th
04 11th
05 6th
06 9th
07 11th
08 2nd (so far)

Not great rankings under Rudy but better than I expected before I looked it up.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 4:23 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Hmmm...

5th in ‘96
2nd in ‘98
3rd in ‘99

Coincidence?

by Topgun22 on May 15, 2008 4:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Not in my opinion...

...those teams had some nice OBP guys like Greer, Clark, McLemore, Palmeiro, Tettleton, etc.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 4:38 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Playoffs...

I was referring to the fact that three of teams four highest OBP ranks came in the years that they made the playoffs.

by Topgun22 on May 15, 2008 4:43 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Me too...

...I was trying to support your point by saying that those teams had good OBP guys which had a lot more to do with their success than any “chemistry” or “leadership” or warm, wholesome “veteran-ness”.

Right around the time all the young talent is ready to contend is when the organization will realize that Ron Washington is the wrong man for the job.

by Chad Crudup on May 15, 2008 4:50 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Oh, Ok

I missed that, sorry

by Topgun22 on May 15, 2008 5:01 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

'04 numbers

Really interesting that we were 11th in ‘04, but posted an 89-73 record.

by jwiscarson on May 15, 2008 5:03 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Working the Count

I am NOT a fan of Washington but I don’t know who to give the credit to other than him. Possibly Daniels for putting the team together, I guess. But it seems like the players are consciously taking pitches. It doesn’t always lead to the best outcome in any particular AB, but over the course of a game and series it sure pays to wear the other teams’ pitching staffs out. Especially if they come in here from New York or Oakland where they’ve already been tortured for three or four games.

I think if you can field a lineup with guys who are genuinely difficult to get out, you’re going to do well even if those guys aren’t as talented and don’t generally put up big fat numbers. OBP isn’t as important a stat as pitches seen per AB, in my opinion. A baseball season is a war of attrition, and the team that goes up there and lets the hittable ball be called a ball and fouls off a lot of pitches is kind of like a disciplined guerrilla force. Very difficult to contend with in the long haul.

by Black Francis on May 15, 2008 5:20 PM CDT   0 recs

Combination

Daniels and Wash. Daniels got better OBP guys, like Bradley, other guys gradually get with the program, the team gets higher OBP. We still don’t really know what this team is, though. Too many injuries and short spans of good and bad luck with their replacements. Still could win anywhere from 70-90 games I think.

...and curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid git.

by t ball on May 15, 2008 8:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I confess

I grew up as a Washington Senators fan.

by SanDiegoKev on May 15, 2008 6:34 PM CDT   0 recs

yeah

sorry about that, that guy still ticks me off.

by SanDiegoKev on May 16, 2008 12:04 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I enjoy seeing them playing in the old uniform

as they did in that Sunday Oakland game recently, I noticed that the particular Senators uniform they were wearing looks very simialr to the Nationals current uniform. The hats look the same. You would wonder about trademark and those issues. Hicks still owns the “Senators” etc.

I think when the team left Washtingon, MLB had a responsibilty to make them give up all trademarks and logos to do with the Senators. It’s bad enough they left, without ripping off and taking everything attached to the team with them. For example, in Football when the Browns left Cleveland, the name stayed behind, etc.

by SanDiegoKev on May 16, 2008 12:16 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Leaving the old identity behind

Most of the time, they don’t. See Utah Jazz, New Orleans Hornets, LA Lakers, St. Louis Rams, etc.

I agree that it would make sense to shed the old name/identity when it makes little sense in the new location (e.g., Utah Jazz), but even then it is rare for the rights to be relinquished without some compensation to the owner.

by mgb5 on May 16, 2008 3:21 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Beginning...

of “Basketball” talking about teams that moved and kept their names. Cracks me up.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on May 16, 2008 3:29 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

So, the name Nats could be in Litigation

It was commnly used to describe those Washington Senator Teams in the local papers, maybe even preferred. Example, Washington Post headline would read for a Sunday Doubleheader (they had them most sundays when team was playing at home): “Nats swatted in Doubleheader.”

so, now look at Senator uniform used by Rangers that Sunday in Oakland:

http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?Entryid=1174&fileName=al_1970_washington.gif

compared to nationals uniform today:

http://exhibits.baseballhalloffame.org/dressed_to_the_nines/detail_page.asp?Entryid=2311&fileName=nl_2008_washington.gif

hat looks the same, who owns the design?

by SanDiegoKev on May 16, 2008 4:58 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Tongue_small
My trip to Bakersfield: Blaze 11, Visalia 2
Tongue_out_small
LSB Community Prospect Project: Mid-Season #14
Tongue_out_small
LSB Community Prospect Project: Mid-Season #13
Kokopelli_small
Clinton Pics
Saltydawg_small
Overshadowed Prospect: Andrew Laughter

Recent FanPosts

Rangerlogo_small
OT: Stubhub question
Small
It's The Pitching Dummy
Small
5 3 3 0 0 3 5 0 1 .345
Saltydawg_small
Minors 7/19/08
Shahada_small
Who is the best player in the game?
Alfalfa_small
Blalock back on third
Tongue_small
Heading to Bakersfield
Small
Kason Gabbard out for the year

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini