Saturday a.m. things
Back to .500. 4 games back of Anaheim, 1 1/2 games back of Oakland, 6 1/2 games up on the poor Mariners.
The Rangers set a team record with 9 doubles yesterday, which helped make up for a bad Kason Gabbard outing. When a finesse lefty can't throw strikes -- Gabbard threw 90 pitches in less than 3 innings yesterday, only 48 of them for strikes -- then he's pretty much doomed. And the TwinsIndians didn't chase those pitches just off the strike zone that Gabbard needs opposing hitters to go after to be successful.
The Rangers performance of late has covered up the fact that the bullpen and the back of the rotation has not been good. Gabbard is going to stay in the rotation because there aren't a lot of better options right now, but his performance going forward is something to watch, because if Matt Harrison or Eric Hurley shows they are ready to move into the rotation, he could find his spot in jeopardy.
Frank Catalanotto is still not ready to play, and as I mentioned last night, I think the Rangers should go ahead and d.l. him to bring up a fresh arm this weekend, then send the extra pitcher back when Hank Blalock is ready to be activated. Chris Shelton has a 121 OPS+, and given how lefty-heavy this team is right now, I don't see how getting rid of a productive righty bat makes sense.
Kevin Millwood will throw a simulated game today, and if all goes perfectly there, he'll be activated for next Friday's game. Otherwise, he'll go on a medical rehab assignment.
And Kevin Sherrington re-visits the Josh Hamilton for Edinson Volquez trade. He thinks it was an okay deal for Texas.
0 recs |
28
comments
Read Related
Comments
The headline "Volquez for Hamilton? Texas Rangers got this one right"
is awesome. Almost as good as the one on DMN’s front page today that said “This just In: The North Wins Civil War!”
"Does this effectively hide my thunder?"
by Bob Loblaw on May 24, 2008 8:34 AM CDT 0 recs
Sherrington article
I read it earlier this morning, and I found myself impressed that he went to hardballtimes and was using stats such as win shares.
"When we're mad we'll use our words. Then the rest of the world will play nice with us. And the only boom-booms will be in our pants." - Ralph Wiggum
by rentz on May 24, 2008 8:37 AM CDT 0 recs
Our standards
for our non-beat writers are dangerously low.
by FirebatM3 on
May 24, 2008 2:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Well...
when it comes to rangers / baseball coverage the columnists tend to fail miserably. so i suppose i’m easily impressed when they do something right.
"When we're mad we'll use our words. Then the rest of the world will play nice with us. And the only boom-booms will be in our pants." - Ralph Wiggum
by rentz on
May 24, 2008 2:27 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Can Volquez keep it up?
Sherrington touches on this at the end of his piece, but do you guys think his numbers are sustainable?
If he mantains his ERA+ at 329, he will have pitched by far the best single season ever (according to this statistic). I imagine we’ll see his numbers come back to earth, but to where?
by Rigaudeau on May 24, 2008 8:51 AM CDT 0 recs
No
His DIPS ERA is a little over 3.00, and his HR rate is likely to go up some, given his FB percentage.
by Adam J. Morris on
May 24, 2008 9:07 AM CDT
up
0 recs
hmm
So where would you project his numbers to be at the end of the season?
by Rigaudeau on
May 24, 2008 9:18 AM CDT
up
0 recs
But..
it’s not like a DIPS ERA around 3.00 is bad news.
Will batters adjust when they see him a second time? Isn’t he just a fastball/change-up guy or are batters respecting his curveball this year?
by Rigaudeau on
May 24, 2008 9:34 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Nobody said he would be bad,
just that he isn’t likely to maintain this high a level of success. Josh Hamilton is much more likely to maintain his level of success. He may not win the triple crown, but he will hit a lot of homers and drive in a lot of runs and play good defense. Volquez is a good pitcher and will have some good stretches, but he is not going to be able to maintain these kind of numbers and is likely to struggle at times just like other good, young pitchers.
by brentash on
May 24, 2008 11:34 AM CDT
up
0 recs
+1
and to add onto his HR rate, he plays in a park that has had alot of HR’s hit in it the past. See : Eric Milton
by hinduplaya on
May 24, 2008 9:27 AM CDT
up
0 recs
Can Hamilton keep it up?
I think he’s much more likely than Volquez to maintain a stellar pace, but we need to realize that he’ll have some slow times as well. But I don’t think you could have asked for this trade to work out any better.
...and curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid git.
by t ball on
May 24, 2008 12:52 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The only way it could have turned out better
is if Volquez were currently carrying a 7+ ERA at 4.2 innings per start… then we wouldn’t get an update every Volquez start on how he’s doing. At least now that Armando Galarraga has come back to earth, we don’t have to hear about him every fifth day anymore.
by Inkara1 on
May 24, 2008 12:58 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Volquez
Some people seem to be forgetting that volquez has switched leagues, meaning most if not all of these players have never seen him pitch before. The only team to play volquez twice was the cubs, and in the second game against them, edinson issed 6 BB. With his fastball changeup combo, i can definitely see why he has had such great early success. Given that this is the major leagues, players make adjustments to pitches and pitchers that they’ve seen multiple times.
baseBALLIN!
by kevzta on May 24, 2008 10:10 AM CDT 0 recs
Cleveland
And the Twins didn’t chase those pitches just off the strike zone that Gabbard needs opposing hitters to go after to be successful.
I think you meant to say the Indians.
by brentash on May 24, 2008 10:26 AM CDT 0 recs
Shelton
He might be a righty, but he can’t hit lefties anymore than lefties can hit lefties.
So far this year, of course an extremely small sample size, he’s got a .969 OPS against righties and a .513 OPS against lefties
Career wise, its a little more respectable .855/.793 difference.
Assuming Cat doesn’t go on the DL, the move that makes the most sense is sending Boggs back down, letting Cat and Byrd platoon, and having Shelton on the bench. I don’t like the idea of putting Bradley in the field anymore. He’s too valuable of a hitter to risk injury to so I’d have him at DH from here on.
by chase1971 on May 24, 2008 11:04 AM CDT 0 recs
Ill still take .795 over
vazquez’s career .520 line.
anyway, I kind of like our all CF defensive OF weve been running out there for a while. id give boggs a little time to try to get back on track before putting cat with his defense and still not that great offense back out there as a starter.
of course, there isnt a lot of time and a move is going to have to be made shortly.. we shall see. i hope shelton sticks around.
Gerald Laird is my hero.
by DSheppard on
May 24, 2008 12:17 PM CDT
up
0 recs
oh and
speaking of pinch hitting for vazquez…
any chance the rangers actually would PH for vazquez with shelton at some point, move blalock to third for the rest of the game and shelton to first? or are they going to be ridiculous about keeping blalock as now a 1b only.
Gerald Laird is my hero.
by DSheppard on
May 24, 2008 12:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The Pitching Numbers
When you break them down, they’re quite troubling:
12th in AL in Team ERA
14th in walks allowed
13th in strikeouts
Innings as starter: 13th
innings pitched by bullpen: 14th
Dead last in runs allowed by a significant margin.
They simply have to get more innings out of the rotation or it’s all going to unravel even more than it already has.
by Black Francis on May 24, 2008 1:04 PM CDT 0 recs
Yep,
they are winning, but looking pretty damn bad doing so. The offense can’t hit like this every game. Theoretically, if the rotation gets healthy it would stabilize the bullpen situation somewhat.
...and curse Sir Walter Raleigh, he was such a stupid git.
by t ball on
May 24, 2008 1:15 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Yup
When millwood was pitching well before he got injured the rotation was looking a lot better. Outside of ponson, padilla and feldman the rangers really arent getting much out of the starters.
"When we're mad we'll use our words. Then the rest of the world will play nice with us. And the only boom-booms will be in our pants." - Ralph Wiggum
by rentz on
May 24, 2008 1:41 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Wow
Outside of ponson, padilla and feldman the rangers really arent getting much out of the starters.
Before the season, what would we have thought the chances were of someone saying that this season?
by Adam J. Morris on
May 24, 2008 1:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Zero
i’m as shocked as anyone
"When we're mad we'll use our words. Then the rest of the world will play nice with us. And the only boom-booms will be in our pants." - Ralph Wiggum
by rentz on
May 24, 2008 1:49 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I believe A.J. Murray would
get called back up before Harrison or Hurley. He did well in his spot start.
Brandon Boggs 2008 Texas Rangers ROY
by RangerMad on May 24, 2008 1:47 PM CDT 0 recs
Best 2 quotes of the season:
From MY, & the Humility is Good Dept:
“Right now, I’m just keeping my head above water, but Josh and Milton are having such good at-bats and good runs behind me that it gives me some breathing room.”
And from RonWash…is he utterly brilliant in his levity, or what?
“Our offense is in a place, well, I don’t even want to find out where that place is…”
...it's the weekend, so why the hell not?
by Rodney on May 24, 2008 2:01 PM CDT 0 recs
Blah
Test to see
if this works
"Chase. Dominguez is not really your liking" - Mr Santos
by Chase Irwin on May 29, 2008 11:40 PM CDT 0 recs
Ah
I think that I might have
“finally gotten it.”
"Chase. Dominguez is not really your liking" - Mr Santos
by Chase Irwin on May 29, 2008 11:41 PM CDT 0 recs








