Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Race to the BCS: rankings, in-game scores & blogs Bar-right-arrows



The closer situation

An interesting exchange about the closer situation over at the DMN blog.  Mike Hindman had a post last night, suggesting that we should not be nervous about C.J. Wilson closing games, because he has just two blown saves this year.

Evan Grant posted a response, walking through the reasons why he thinks there is cause for concern.

 

0 recs | Comment 90 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I agree with a lot of what Grant says

but he has really come off as someone who just flat out doesn’t like CJ lately.

He’s written quite a few critical things about Wilson this year—beginning with the stuff in spring training.

www.mavsmoneyball.com

by Wes Cox on Jul 14, 2008 2:35 PM CDT   0 recs

Has

Has anything that Grant has written about CJ been incorrect or unwarranted? The stuff in spring training was a legit news story and as a reporter he was doing his job.

by jf55510 on Jul 14, 2008 2:40 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

yes

making a big deal of CJ getting a mohawk when he was going through tough times, for one (characterizing it as CJ being more concerned about personal grooming than baseball – which is a ridiculous conclusion).

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 2:52 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah

That was the one where I really thought “give me a break”.

www.mavsmoneyball.com

by Wes Cox on Jul 14, 2008 2:59 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Well

Well, I would make a big deal about it as it shows what is going through your closers head. You are sucking so instead of working on mechanics, looking at tape, extra bullpen sessions with the pitching coach, you go get a haircut. Grant’s bigger point, and seeming to be accurate point, is that CJ is more concerned with the fluffy fun stuff than taking care of business. If CJ was closing down games and being solid in the 9th, the guitar hero, mohawk things wouldn’t be a problem. But he isn’t solid.

by jf55510 on Jul 14, 2008 3:50 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Its a fucking haircut

Guys get them all the time. I get one every couple weeks. Does it mean that I am trying to change whats going on in my life good or bad? No. It means my damn hair is long and I need a cut. And in case some of you old folks haven’t noticed the “mohawk” or something similar to it is in style for some guys today. Chris Davis has a semi hawk. Anyone wanna make a big deal out of that?

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Jul 14, 2008 3:57 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Except

Except did it in relation to his performance. Not to just get a haircut.

by jf55510 on Jul 14, 2008 4:03 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

he did?

Link plz?

"I really think JD is probably going to be one of the best things ever to happen to the Rangers." - Longhorn, May 27th, 2007

by Longhorn on Jul 14, 2008 4:25 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Didn't that just happen?

I think I clearly remember that’s why he did it—he was sucking shit.

by brettgardner on Jul 14, 2008 4:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

ohh

okay.

Kinda like that time where everyone would bleach their hair.

"I really think JD is probably going to be one of the best things ever to happen to the Rangers." - Longhorn, May 27th, 2007

by Longhorn on Jul 14, 2008 4:30 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

without question

he got it cut the day after june 19th when he was pulled AFTER SUCKING SHIT.

i remember thinking at the time AYFK? he pitched like crap and then whacked his lettuce. i thought it was a sign a desperation, but it is, after all, a haircut.

it wasn’t until i realized that it was a mohawk (before going to see the president of the us) that i realized the guy was a little off.

by sam in so cal on Jul 14, 2008 9:04 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Could not agree more

with bigsteve and ab03 (below ). The article has some good points but comes off as super petty. I was a fan of EG, not sure anymore (and I am old, 60+).

Laird for President

by rldwb on Jul 14, 2008 4:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

+1 to the petty part

Something happened between CJ and Evan.

If CJ ever comes back to LSB, he should use the “HeHateMe” screen name.

by robert_d_wilfong on Jul 14, 2008 7:07 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

You definitely get that tone in EG's writing.

For example, the whole bit about guitar hero seemed like it didn’t really belong with the rest of the blog entry. But EG is correct about CJ’s pitching flaws. He has a real issue throwing strikes. His WHIP is just awful, especially for a closer, and it’s been getting worse lately. If he can’t start throwing strikes, those walks are going to start biting him in the rear and he’s going to start blowing more saves.

by Athos on Jul 14, 2008 2:49 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

throwing strikes

definitely a problem. bigger problem is that the strikes he is throwing, hitters are hitting them

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 2:53 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

and #5 in Grant's blog

flat out uncalled for.

I know EG reads this blog sometimes so as a big EG fan, I’ll say that he needs to tone it down. I don’t see any reason why he should have any sort of grudge against CJ but from the last few posts about him, it’s plain as day that he does. For a guy who is otherwise level headed, this is rather disappointing.

5 has nothing to do with with whether CJ should be the closer. If anything, it has to do with why CJ should be a Ranger – pointing to serious things like team chemistry and not getting along with teammates. Really EG? you’re going to make that claim? You better back up a catty hypothetical like, “But might not teammates look at Wilson and wonder if playing Guitar Hero, dabbling in film-making, working with the Rangers on marketing, driving race cars, blogging and so forth might cut into his drive to be the absolute best pitcher he can be” with something more.

Seriously, that whole paragraph was extremely disappointing

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 3:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yeah

that just shouldn’t have been included in his argument. He makes a good point but it just makes EG look like he has a grudge against BGL.

"Mr. Hicks, you watch, I'm going to be a leader on this team." Kinsler

by sprite on Jul 14, 2008 3:05 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

There's a paragraph in

Hindman’s original statement that seems a little out of place as well. Is there a little bit of hero worship (guitar?) in his middle paragraph, likening his personal life of thrill seeking to his actions on the mound? I don’t know about the rest of you, but I don’t think its cute or cool that he comes so close to failure in his job so often. Something we can accept until ???, but not to be admired.
Honestly, I don’t think CJ would relate his thrill seeking personal life to his pitching results. Not intentionally, anyway.
Can anyone analyze yesterday’s 9th inning to see if velocity, command, etc was an/the issue? Is it here or NMLR where someone plots pitches velocity and location for analysis?

by mcgee48c on Jul 14, 2008 3:06 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I actually agree with Hindman

Look at his game log.

He has 2 blown saves, 2 “lucky” saves (where he gave up 2 or more runs). Every other save situation he’s been in, he’s been very solid.

When it’s not a save situation is when he seems to fall apart.

by venturafearsnolan on Jul 14, 2008 2:44 PM CDT   0 recs

there you go

And that wouldn’t even count last night, since it wasn’t a save situation, if I’m not mistaken.

"You’re the only here who contributes schtick only." - brettgardner

by trza on Jul 14, 2008 3:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

he also blew another 4-run save

so he is really 22 for 25 and hes blown at least two ties this year

Kinsler is the best player on the rangers(done), BENOIT SUCKS(done), bring up Harrison(done),new: Put Nippert in rotation, Mendoza to the pen, get Feliz to AAA by the end of the year, trade cat

by nice hands on Jul 14, 2008 3:18 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

and he blew that one where they gave the blown save to wright

when wright came in with a guy on 1st and 3rd with 1 out and score was 3-4

SO cj wilson is really 22 for 26

Kinsler is the best player on the rangers(done), BENOIT SUCKS(done), bring up Harrison(done),new: Put Nippert in rotation, Mendoza to the pen, get Feliz to AAA by the end of the year, trade cat

by nice hands on Jul 14, 2008 3:22 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

What a surprise.

Hindman says something that is completely unsupportable by anyone capable of understanding a stat more complex than RBIs.

by PatrickWalz on Jul 14, 2008 2:46 PM CDT   0 recs

that was funny

i don’t think he was really making a case for CJ (at least not from that post, might have said something in the comments) – just pointing out an interesting stat that the average fan might not have been aware of.

BS isn’t a completely useless stat for a closer usually brought into the 9th inning when his team is winning.

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 3:06 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

+1

"I really think JD is probably going to be one of the best things ever to happen to the Rangers." - Longhorn, May 27th, 2007

by Longhorn on Jul 14, 2008 3:37 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

CJ

Didn’t he blow a game that wasn’t technically a save situation, since he entered the game with a 4 run lead? In my book, that should count as a blown save, if not a blown save and a half. I mean, if he had blown the thing last night, it also wouldn’t have counted as a blown save, meaning that Hindman’s point would have remained technically true and yet meaningless.

"You’re the only here who contributes schtick only." - brettgardner

by trza on Jul 14, 2008 3:07 PM CDT   0 recs

You know

I’m staying away from the sidelines of this cat fight. When CJ’s baseball career is in the balance, now or later, he’ll decide the path to pursue. Baseball, entertainment, media, or who knows (?) maybe teaching or coaching. He’s playing multiple cards on different tables. That’s been done before, and believe it or not, the individual doesn’t always end up on the apparent logical path.

"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912)

by Ed Coffin on Jul 14, 2008 3:08 PM CDT   0 recs

i just don't agree with this sentiment

he’s not taking trips to Hollywood to act. He’s making 2 minute promos on the side and playing guitar hero at home – when other players are probably going out to bars or spending time with their families. Yeah, he has a guitar hero charity event – and a TON of other players hold charity events during the year.

You and Grant characterize CJ’s plate as too full and I see no evidence of this. For a single bachelor with nothing else to do, his hobbies just happen to be a little bit more high profile – but they take up almost no extra time.

I love how “maintaining a blog” is such a time consuming chore. Yup, I’m sure he spends hours on it.

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 3:12 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

agreed

he posts on his blog about once a month and guitar hero, big deal

Kinsler is the best player on the rangers(done), BENOIT SUCKS(done), bring up Harrison(done),new: Put Nippert in rotation, Mendoza to the pen, get Feliz to AAA by the end of the year, trade cat

by nice hands on Jul 14, 2008 3:20 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Too serious and narrow

Nowhere did I say CJ was spending too much time on anything. What is not factual about pointing out his variety of interests? No offense, but you can’t read “characterize his plate as too full” from “baseball, entertainmnet, media, or who knows?” And anything worth doing does take time.

We might have to ask CJ what, in the end, is his top priority, and since he is multitalented and with diverse interests, you might get a different answer annually. Also, I didn’t take much from Evan Grant’s writing as a characterization. To do so would involve review of motivation, practices, and possibly allocation of time. Heh, this is exactly why I typed “staying out of the catfight”.

"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912)

by Ed Coffin on Jul 14, 2008 3:23 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

again

“we might have to ask CJ what is his top priority” No, we don’t. At least, not given any of the evidence I’ve seen. His other interests are plainly hobbies. Nobody pursues blogging and guitar hero as a career.

Yes, he has a variety of interests. No, it absolutely is not evidence that his priorities might be different. He’s not practicing medicine on the side. We don’t need to worry that he might want to be doing something else.

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 3:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Nonsense

I don’t have a “rather” about what he should or shouldn’t do. All I pointed out was that his interests are widely diverse. And I think he’s pretty seriously interested, or a student, or a competitor, in each thing he chooses to do. Tired of having simple data screened and misinterpreted to suit the whim of anyone with an axe to grind.

"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912)

by Ed Coffin on Jul 14, 2008 11:55 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

What axe?

You are suggesting that his diverse interest are almost on par with his interest in baseball, such that they are possible career paths. I question why these thing cannot simply a hobby; something that he does to entertain himself – much like other players with golf.

by Telegraph on Jul 15, 2008 7:34 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

CJ's Style

I say: keep the PGA and MLB in different corners. There’s nothing wrong with a solid sense of style. The game benefits from it.

by 3Bagger on Jul 14, 2008 3:11 PM CDT   0 recs

Payne Stewart had style

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 3:15 PM CDT to parent up   1 recs

reply

Nice. I miss him.

by 3Bagger on Jul 14, 2008 3:28 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

btw

i completely agree with grant about some points. CJ allows way way too many baserunners

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 3:20 PM CDT   0 recs

Wilson might not be the closer right now

if the team had another serious option. Still, I’d leave him there for the rest of this season and then figure out what to do then. He needs to think much, much less.

Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted.

by t ball on Jul 14, 2008 3:21 PM CDT   0 recs

Concur

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jul 15, 2008 12:40 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Don't see the "situation"

we just don’t have a better option right now. it makes no sense to insert Steady Eddie, with his 86 mph fastballs and, more importantly, his lack of future with this team.

stick with CJ for the remainder of the year. Closers are like starting quarterbacks, there is always someone on the roster who could be better, and because of that, the fans focus their ire on the incumbent.

I don’t think Grant and Hindman are having any sort of debate, because i think they would both agree that CJ is the best option on this roster. Could his peripherals be better, of course, but i am sure mike would agree with that.

by clark on Jul 14, 2008 3:22 PM CDT   0 recs

Why not Frankie Frank?

Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!

by DerekSTheRed on Jul 14, 2008 3:40 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Because he can't start innings

Hes great out of the pen with guys on but when he has to start an inning its scary

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Jul 14, 2008 3:44 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

His splits

don’t reflect that at all.

"So you think the Celtics will beat Detroit? Hell will freeze over before that happens, mark my words." miles 5/20/08

by badradiorules on Jul 14, 2008 10:18 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

leading off an inning

tOPS+ 102

first batter 48

http://www.baseball-reference.com/pi/psplit.cgi?n1=francfr01

"An effortless 98" - Scott Gardner after Neftali Feliz's first AA pitch

by RangerMad on Jul 14, 2008 10:40 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

That's in his career

which is obviously up and down.

2008:

leading of an inning: tOPS+ 20
first batter tOPS + 60

Men On tOPS+ 100
Bases empty tOPS+ 100

Maybe I’m reading it wrong, but it looks like to me that he’s better leading off the inning and dead even with men on vs. bases empty.

B-R

"So you think the Celtics will beat Detroit? Hell will freeze over before that happens, mark my words." miles 5/20/08

by badradiorules on Jul 14, 2008 11:31 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

wilson is really 22 for 26!

Kinsler is the best player on the rangers(done), BENOIT SUCKS(done), bring up Harrison(done),new: Put Nippert in rotation, Mendoza to the pen, get Feliz to AAA by the end of the year, trade cat

by nice hands on Jul 14, 2008 3:23 PM CDT   0 recs

Seems like poor arguments on both sides

Save percentage is an arbitrary stat, alone it is very hard to extract meaningful information out of it, though it is obviously something you want to be high, which CJ has done.

EG’s arguments are pretty silly though. Only the last one has any real merit – that CJ allows too many baserunners. The rest are either arbitrary or derive from the base runners argument.

Too many pitches? That probably has to do with too many baserunners. And last I checked, there is no penalty to the team who throws the most pitches. Obviously you want a guy to get in and out fast, so he is always fresh the next day, but this is orthogonal to quality.

Pitchers who through too many pitches may get injured? That is why we should worry about him coming into the 9th inning of a 5-4 game? Huh? Obviously we want CJ healthy, which means throw less, which means walk fewer guys, but it all gets back to walk fewer guys…

I won’t even touch the personality stuff – we all know that many closers are quirky, so who cares.

Basically, EG’s argument comes down to 1 good point (which alone is probably sufficient to be worried), two redundant, not really applicable points, and 1 just irrelevant point. I almost want to side with MJH just because he is concise…

by JBImaknee on Jul 14, 2008 3:50 PM CDT   0 recs

Yeah,

I don’t think either made a case. EG is doing the same thing everyone else here did when Mendoza had that terrible start: Flip out and say he doesn’t deserve the role. Yes, he needs to improve on letting people get on base. And when he does???? We will all be talking about what great a job he’s doing. EG’s writing is a perfect example, its impossible to bring your A-game skills to each article or blog entry. Sometimes he sucks. Sometimes checking DMN’s website for what EG wrote is the first thing I do when I open up Firefox. But when he sucks I don’t say I’m not confident he’s the best beat writer we got.

by corbsclinton on Jul 14, 2008 4:13 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Bring Back Gagne

Looking at C.J. this year versus C.J. last year, the big difference that I see is that he gets into extended bouts of nibbling on hitters with outside fastballs and breaking balls this year that lead to walks.

I’m willing to give C.J. more time, although I am significantly less bullish on him than I was in April. Our pitching staff’s numbers as a group are almost an inverse of the team’s offensive numbers. This is not a staff that’s going to be fixed by trades or that is suddenly going to snap to and start turning in quality start after quality start down the stretch. I think that getting too concerned with the closer when the starting pitching and bullpen are generally a mess is to focus on the wrong thing. C.J. should have the rest of the season to show he’s either earned it or burned it. If he’s still nibbling on batters and walking guys and giving up hits that flirt with blowing the situation at hand in September, well then he’s definitively shown us he’s not the closer of the future. You don’t pull the plug on your closer at the ASB who, while way too dramatic in his duties, is pitching at the back end of the worst rotation and bullpen in the American League in ERA, BA, OPS, WHIP and quality starts.

I also think that C.J.’s issues have as much to do with our craptastic pitching coaching as they do with C.J. Everything about this team’s pitching woes that isn’t medical scream craptastic pitching coaching. I feel C.J. has the arsenal and he has the juice to do it. In the absence of the Rangers having a real major league pitching coach perhaps the best thing we can do for C.J. is to bring back Eric Gagne; Gagne seemed to be a really effective mentor for Wilson. We could probably get him for cheap from the Brew Crew.

by Mister Naxal on Jul 14, 2008 4:04 PM CDT   0 recs

Of course I read Lone Star Ball

Happy All-Star break! And there’s nothing I enjoy more on an All-Star break than reading some fine blogging. But I’m hurt that you didn’t carry over your conversation about my thoughts on CJ Wilson to our blog.

Let, me just once again remind you that I in no way dislike CJ Wilson. I love him. Want him to be a lights-out closer, full of quirks and all of that. I think his desire to interact and stay close with fans is admirable in so many ways.

I think the technical points about too many pitches and too many baserunners were, by and large, accepted by the LSB community as pretty much significant issues. It’s the question I raise about stuff he says and does that bothers you guys.

Well, it bothers me, too. After I was told about the BaD Radio interview, I got a copy of it and listened to it. I questioned CJ about it. He decided he didn’t want to implicitly name names. And that’s his right. But while I felt it was unprofessional of Mark Teixeira to throw the organization under the bus before last year’s deadline and then refuse to answer questions about the contract offer the Rangers made to him, it also bothered me for CJ to make some accusations about teammates and lead everybody in the world to believe those arguments were about very specific players. He even agreed with hints that Bob Sturm tried to give his audience. Just think if you are going to make accusations, you ought to make them and leave no doubt about you are talking about. I realize a lot of you think you’ve got that all figured out, but maybe not the listening audience in general. Second, while he was rightly praising this clubhouse’s chemistry (something we noticed back in spring when we wrote about the prank war), he veered off into last year’s chemistry problem with no prompting. Seemed gratuitous to me and the folks who heard it initially and made me aware.

And then there was the content of those comments. If a player was saying “Cha-Ching” when he made a truly great play or “Somebody is going to pay me for that,” it does not mean said player is not interested in winning. In the clubhouse environment, having interests as varied as C.J.’s can also lead teammates to think maybe he’s not as locked in on winning as some of those players. Not suggesting C.J. isn’t. But I am suggesting that the same accusations he made about former players are the same kind of observations teammates COULD make about him. Everybody expresses themselves differently. C.J. should know that better than anybody. To make statements like he did, to me shows some kind of lack of the understanding of that concept. Same as making the gross generalizations about teammates’ political habits in spring training. Those are just things that are not going to endear you to teammates and if you have something really important to say, who cares, if you aren’t loved by teammates. But the occasions where CJ has been provocative this year have been more gossipy than anything else. Wanna know something that can kill clubhouse chemistry? A gossipy teammate.

The blessing and a curse comment from yesterday was another example of that, though on a much smaller scale. Talk to pitching coaches and they will tell you there is no such thing as a guy having a fastball with too much movement. Those guys are simply “wild.” It’s the guys who learn how to harness that movement with precision that are elite level pitchers. I’m going to make an assumption here, but I’m going to guess that he’s been told that before. And he’s been told that he doesn’t need to throw such a wide range of pitches.

In the end guys, CJ has done a decent job for his first year as closer. But when Ron Washington clarified his comments last year about having no closer on the team, he said CJ needed to be more efficient with his pitches to have long-term success in the role. I think the manager makes a very salient point and I think it’s something CJ is going to have to address to go from being a decent first-year closer to an elite-level guy. And I think everybody who reads this board would like to see CJ Wilson be an elite-level closer.

by Evan Grant on Jul 14, 2008 4:13 PM CDT   0 recs

Not me, really.

I’d rather see him in a different uniform and Josh Rupe or Warner Madrigal or Frankie or whoever else as an elite-level closer.

by brettgardner on Jul 14, 2008 4:21 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Stop it!

"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
"If you ain't got no money, ain't nobody calls you honey," Bo Diddley

by Rodney on Jul 14, 2008 4:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Rupe? Seriously?

At least Frankie and Madrigal have stuff you can bank on… but Rupe? He’s everything that defines a middle reliever.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/blog/shutdown_corner/post/Stuff-You-Need-Brett-Favre-action-figure-bench?urn=nfl,93739

by BudLight on Jul 14, 2008 4:54 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

CJ

gives unsolicited 1st hand insight into the clubhouse that most players don’t. He’s also in his 20’s. Could those two things be a negative toward clubhouse chemistry? Absolutely could. Especially if well spoken writers focus on that crap instead of baserunners and pitch counts. He’s weird. We get it. He speaks his mind and its often obvious who he’s talking about when he doesn’t mention names. got it. But trying to those two things with the previous two is a reach man. A premature reach (comments @ the break) at that. I hope he continues to speak his mind. Its refreshing. It’ll be more refreshing when he gets back to normal ON the field.

by corbsclinton on Jul 14, 2008 4:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

umm, uhh

what?

"I really think JD is probably going to be one of the best things ever to happen to the Rangers." - Longhorn, May 27th, 2007

by Longhorn on Jul 14, 2008 4:29 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

DMN blog

Stopped posting over there for several reasons. One was the fact that debates and conversations were too dificult to keep up with whereas opposed to this blog you can have a running dialogue rather easily. another was that CAPTCHA code thingy that even when the right code was entered I had to do it several times sometimes losing everything that was written. And third was sometimes comments got moderated and not posted and no explanation given via email.

I fully understand that that blog and this are two completely different situations. That being run by a newspaper has much tighter rules and restrictions whereas this is run by Adam and is looser, not in a bad way, in its rules. I really got fed up with constantly getting urged to comment by yourself and Richard and Timmy but yet to actually comment was very dificult. I would gladly go back over there but not unless some things got tweaked and it was more user friendly.

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Jul 14, 2008 4:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The DMN blog

I have always found it impossible to carry on a meaningful discussion over there. No offense to Evan or anyone else who actually writes the blog, but their group of “loyal commenters” is intolerable.

A Lonestar in California

"My keyboard is a Yankees fan" - Whipsmart

by lonestarJon on Jul 14, 2008 9:11 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

maybe

I gotta confess I don’t really read the comments, though. The main posts are usually quite good though. Even McMahon has grown into it a bit. And it’s good that Rangers fans have yet another forum to talk about the team.

"You’re the only here who contributes schtick only." - brettgardner

by trza on Jul 14, 2008 11:27 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

i can't really post right now becaue I have no time but check back later

would just like to say that the “cha-ching” player was GMJ

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 5:41 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

but really quickly again

i don’t see how these clubhouse comments apply to a debate about whether he should be a closer. you seem to bring that up when it is not necessary

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2008 5:44 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

CJ

it doesnt matter what he says about ex-teammates or does off the field, if his performance is good no one will care.

and thats what he’s got to figure out is how to become an effective closer. I find it hard to believe the guy was so good last year (especially vs lefties) and now this year can’t hack it.

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 14, 2008 8:20 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

re:
Those are just things that are not going to endear you to teammates and if you have something really important to say, who cares, if you aren’t loved by teammates.

Are you implying that they’re players on the team that do not like CJ? And, if so, who are they?

"I really think JD is probably going to be one of the best things ever to happen to the Rangers." - Longhorn, May 27th, 2007

by Longhorn on Jul 14, 2008 4:39 PM CDT   0 recs

he's not going to divulge that..

that would make a mess in the clubhouse.

Milly I have no choice but to nickname you "The Laborer".
Every time I see you on the mound you're laboring through the inning.
You sure as hell don't labor when you hear Dunkin Donuts is closing in
15 minutes, sat there with a chocolate eclair with 5 minutes to spare.

by LAMuscleFag on Jul 14, 2008 4:48 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Well he went public with the CJ stuff in Spring Training

that didn’t stop him then…

I'm undefeated in fights. Have I been in any? No. Thats because people know my f'ing status. Don't mess with the elite. - Miles

by Dirk Diggler on Jul 14, 2008 4:59 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

My guess is...

...that there were players who were willing to speak on the record about that.

by Adam J. Morris on Jul 14, 2008 5:32 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs