Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Check out our NFL Scoreboard: scores, schedule and blogs Bar-right-arrows



Thursday morning things

All right!  First day after the All Star Break!

Of course, due to the genius of the MLB scheduling folks -- the same folks who think that it is a good idea to have less than a full slate of games on Memorial Day -- a bunch of teams, including the Rangers, are off today.  So no game tonight.

Hank Blalock is expected to be activated -- finally -- on Friday.  No word on who will be sent down to make room for him, but the speculation has been that it will be Chris Davis.

Richard Durrett has a piece up about the chemistry of the team, that includes some of the rituals and themes from this season...this piece includes an awesome quote from Tom Hicks:

While Brandon Boggs was keeping tabs on the finger about a month ago, it was stolen from the dugout. A replacement was found immediately.

Several players speculated that someone from the owner's suite near the dugout took the finger, possibly one of owner Tom Hicks' sons.

Hicks denied those claims.

"I have heard from all my sons, and we were not the red finger stealers," Hicks said.

Evan Grant talks about the importance of this particular game, taking place at Yankee Stadium in its final year, to some Rangers...

Anthony Andro says the Rangers won't likely deal veterans at the trade deadline.  Andro has the odds of Hank Blalock being moved at 10-1, Frank Catalanotto at 25-1, and Milton Bradley at 40-1.  I think this is way off...there's a greater than 10% chance, I think, that Blalock gets moved, and better than a 4% chance Cat gets moved.

 

0 recs | Comment 116 comments

Read Related

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

a lot of similarities in the Brett Favre / Hank Blalock situations

okay, not so many I guess.

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Jul 17, 2008 9:58 AM CDT   0 recs

hank blalock for chris davis

now that it is actually happening, I find myself being very upset by it. Davis better be up in a month. Davis’s numbers prove that he needs some development time in the majors.

""If they'd have told me you can make the team but you've got to shine the shoes, I'd have been there shining shoes." -Bradley

by ab03 on Jul 17, 2008 9:59 AM CDT   0 recs

I'm not happy with it either

If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. So… Blalock’s the vet. The team needs to up the trade value. Blah. Whatever. I say stick with Beasticon, Jr.

Good to see the guys are having fun this year. 13 games over .500 since that dubious 9-18 start. That’s pretty freaking sweet and incredible to consider since they have the worst ERA in the AL.

There is no such thing as global warming. David Murphy was cold, so he turned the sun up.

by SarasotaRanger on Jul 17, 2008 10:09 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

it really is telling how nobody is really even

bringing up Blalock going back to 3B in the media. I think whoever said it the other day (Adam?) that the team was afraid of putting Blalock back at 3B because they know his arm is crap now was right on point. Blalock’s trade value is low right now, but it may be even worse at 3B.

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Jul 17, 2008 10:14 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I think it's pretty much a given

that the guy can’t make the throws anymore. Imagine him trying to dive, push himself up, and throw a dart to nail a runner. I just can’t see that out of him.

You are correct… putting him at third could be very counterproductive. 1B/DH scenario is the best option and they’d better hope he can get hot and start raking.

There is no such thing as global warming. David Murphy was cold, so he turned the sun up.

by SarasotaRanger on Jul 17, 2008 10:38 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

hes a thridbaseman

if he cant play thried he should go on the DL the rest of the season.

"Do they know who I am? Do they know my status? Thats what I thought."
-Miles 6/21/08

.501 or bust!

by Jayslick on Jul 17, 2008 11:32 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

holy crap

thats some misspelled-ness

"Do they know who I am? Do they know my status? Thats what I thought."
-Miles 6/21/08

.501 or bust!

by Jayslick on Jul 17, 2008 11:32 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The only possible reason to do this

Is to make Blalock a tradeable commodity. And even if he has a hot 10 days or so, is anyone really going to give up that much for a guy that will probably hit .270/.340/.460 or so while learning to play first base?

by mikedallas45 on Jul 17, 2008 10:14 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Waivers

You can still trade Blalock after July 31st as long as he clears waivers. You could also work out a trade with the team that claims him.

Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!

by DerekSTheRed on Jul 17, 2008 12:52 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

i'm beginning to think that moving Cat is a long-shot

his salary isn’t cheap for a pinch hitter or fill-in type.

I think there are other options available to teams looking for someone like Cat that will be easier to acquire.

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Jul 17, 2008 10:00 AM CDT   0 recs

I've thought for awhile

that moving Cat was unlikely. Platoon DHs just don’t have that much value, especially ones that hit .280/.356/.396. I think he will remain a bench guy.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 10:10 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

mlbtraderumors has the DBacks close to acquiring Tony Clark

for a AA pitching prospect. Tony Clark seems pretty comparable to Cat.

Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!

by DerekSTheRed on Jul 17, 2008 12:54 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I assume

that’s a middle relief type prospect? Not a front line starter prospect I wouldn’t assume.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 1:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Durrett article

Did anyone else find this part odd?

“Catcher Gerald Laird said such chemistry is one reason a team that fell 7 ½ games out of first place a month into the season finds itself within 7 ½ of first at the All-Star break.”

So thanks to positive chemistry, they’re exactly the same number of games out of first now as at they were on May 1?

I know that’s probably supposed to be a good thing considering how poorly they played the first month, but it struck me as an odd quote…

"I dont care to debate with a troll." - Sharky

by RCCook on Jul 17, 2008 10:03 AM CDT   0 recs

it does sound a bit odd...

i think he’s just saying that it’s remarkable that the team didn’t just throw in the towel being 7 1/2 out so early. They’ve scratched and clawed (and relied on the chemistry) to keep pace with the best teams in baseball since then.

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Jul 17, 2008 10:13 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

rofl

ive been thinking the same thing…

"Do they know who I am? Do they know my status? Thats what I thought."
-Miles 6/21/08

.501 or bust!

by Jayslick on Jul 17, 2008 11:34 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

proofread

Does Durrett proofread his work. I am sure it made sense in his head.

"An effortless 98" - Scott Gardner after Neftali Feliz's first AA pitch

by RangerMad on Jul 17, 2008 11:55 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Dealing Blalock now = Retarded

Unless he comes back and just mashes the crap out of the ball while bounding around the infield like a gazeelse screaming at the top of his lungs, “I’m healthy! I’m healthy!”

Seriously, what team would be interested in him right now, and what could we possibly get?

The 40 Trumps All!!!

by thedirkatron on Jul 17, 2008 10:16 AM CDT   0 recs

Are we going to want to exercise

his option next year though? If we don’t exercise, we get rid of him for nothing though.

If all he can do is play 1B, due to his arm, I can’t imagine we’d want to pay $6.5 million to block Chris Davis. That would be even more retarded.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 10:25 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

It's a conundrum, I know

If he can’t play 3b anymore then personally I’d just run him out there at DH.

Hopefully by next year (if we still even have him) Milt will be ready to play COF most every day and Hank can take over DH.

I just hate to deal a guy as talented as Hank right now at his absolute lowest point. Bring him back next year to DH and pray he gets his act together in a walk-year miracle.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

by thedirkatron on Jul 17, 2008 10:43 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I agree with you

Bring Blalock back, and if he hits well for the next three months, then you have a better trade chip on your hands (you can exercise the option and then trade him). If he hits really poorly, you just let him go, but I doubt that will be necessary. Blalock’s intrinsic value is such that someone will want him in a deal. Maybe not for Josh Beckett and Mike Lowell anymore, but for something…

by JBImaknee on Jul 17, 2008 10:46 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Hank and

Danks for Beckett and Lowell. Just playing the MJH role.

by mcgee48c on Jul 17, 2008 11:07 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

You don't really know that

What if the Rangers had countered with Blalock, Danks, Diamond and Arias? If that happens, Beckett and Lowell are Rangers now.

"Sooner or later, prospects kill you, because you hang onto them." - Greggo, 11/22/2005

by Agreen07 on Jul 17, 2008 11:38 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Of course...

...Beckett would have also had his crappy 2006 season here instead of in Boston, and then likely would have walked as a free agent after 2007…

by Adam J. Morris on Jul 17, 2008 11:51 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

well

i don’t think he’s arguing that point.

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 12:31 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

nevermind

didn’t read ‘now’ the first time.

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 12:32 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

You don't know that

the Rangers could have made the trade then immediately locked up Beckett long-term.

"Sooner or later, prospects kill you, because you hang onto them." - Greggo, 11/22/2005

by Agreen07 on Jul 17, 2008 1:02 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

if that did happen

we’d get 2 1sts. Nothing wrong with that.

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 1:05 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

for blalock and danks at that point

there was nothing wrong with 2 1sts?

i dont agree.

"Do they know who I am? Do they know my status? Thats what I thought."
-Miles 6/21/08

.501 or bust!

by Jayslick on Jul 17, 2008 1:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

well

we kinda would have got beckett and lowell in the trade. atleast 2 years for their services is nothing?

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 1:11 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Lowell

People tend to only see what he has done in Boston. At the time he was just a contract shedding by Florida. the only reason Beckett was available was thats what they had to give up to get rid of Lowells contract. he was making alot of money and had come off two consecutive declining seasons and was turning 31 years old. Not exactlyt the recipe for success for the next 4 years.

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Jul 17, 2008 2:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yet,

I still wanted him at the time. Blalock hadn’t had a good full season in 2 years at the time.

I was always bummed that the Rangers dithered so long on that one.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 2:03 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I think you are mistaken

The two previous seasons he had averaged 160 games, had a .269 avg, averaged 28 HRs and 100 rbi and was only 24. If you wanted to give that up for a 31 year old coming off a .236/ .298/ .360 season with 18 million remaining and 2 years left on his contract then I don’t know what to say

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Jul 17, 2008 2:17 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Blalock was

a 730/740 OPS both years, with an OPS+ around 90, and fell apart completely during the 2nd half.

I’m not mistaken about that.

I was willing to take Lowell as a filler at 3B to get Beckett, because I didn’t think then, and I don’t think now, that we would deeply regret losing Blalock, and Beckett has Ace potential.

I viewed it as Joe Crede and a prospect for one of the top 20 young arms in baseball, and a throw in veteran 3B.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 2:21 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

No

You are mistaken. Lowells first year in Boston was 2006. Blalock in 2004 was a .855 OPS with an OPS+ of 113. In 2005 he dipped a little and was a .749 with an OPS+ of 93. But again he was only 24 and if you had the crystal ball to envision Lowell doing what he has done at his age in Boston and hank doing what he has done at his age in Texas since then then you my friend are in the wrong business.

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Jul 17, 2008 2:35 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

as parcells would say

consider yourself sucked. Lowell had a bad 05 and his stock was low because of an injury. Boston knew exactly what they were doing. Lowell mashes lefties, still a good 3B, and bringing him into Fenway from a absolutely great pitchers park was going to help a lot as well. Epstein WANTED Lowell in the trade, but it was portrayed by the media that he was a ‘throw in’, when in fact, he was not…

By the way, Lowell was pretty good in FLA too..

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 2:13 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Uh Lowell sucked leading up to that trade

and yes, he was contract shed. That’s it.

by cmkelly29 on Jul 18, 2008 12:32 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Actually, if Danks was included from the start

trade would have went down.

Just playing the ‘that is what was actually being reported in FLA’ role.

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 12:30 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

If Danks was included from the start...

...Florida goes to the BoSox and gets Hanley in the deal earlier…

by Adam J. Morris on Jul 17, 2008 2:09 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yup

The 40 Trumps All!!!

by thedirkatron on Jul 17, 2008 2:13 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

click the links

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 2:25 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

you may be right

you may be wrong.

But certainly Hicks doesn’t agree with your assessment, and he was just a little closer to it than you are.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 2:23 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Okay

Daniels says otherwise, though, and normally, you aren’t the type to put a lot of credence into what Hicks says.

by Adam J. Morris on Jul 17, 2008 2:40 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I don't recall

Daniels saying otherwise.

Do you have a link?

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 2:43 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Meh

FLA is going to run our offer by Boston before pulling the trigger. It’s the same thing we were doing with Atlanta’s Tex deal before accepting

Boston bit on Beckett. The Dodgers and Angels didn’t bite on Tex.

Plaschke: Scioscia, the former Dodgers catcher, is the model manager who has created an atmosphere of winning.
Junior:It's that simple. Mike Scioscia brings a Glade Plug-In labeled "Winning™" into the clubhouse and everyone who breathes it in gains 15 points in average.

by TheBZA on Jul 17, 2008 2:34 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

huh?

i just proved that was not the case. Whatever, selective evidence is what we look at now. I get it.

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 2:45 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

One quote

Is hardly proof. Do you really think teams say “Okay!” immediately after a good trade proposal? Outside of maybe the Kazmir/Zambrano trade I’m pretty sure they shop that offer one last time before accepting….

Plaschke: Scioscia, the former Dodgers catcher, is the model manager who has created an atmosphere of winning.
Junior:It's that simple. Mike Scioscia brings a Glade Plug-In labeled "Winning™" into the clubhouse and everyone who breathes it in gains 15 points in average.

by TheBZA on Jul 17, 2008 3:33 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

okay

you’re right, the marlins said include Danks in the trade and we’ll do it, but let me take that offer 3 days later to other teams and check it out. right.

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 3:48 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Milty

I’d rather have him as the DH, playing outfield only about twice a week. I would never count on him being healthy enough to play the field very often, and I don’t want another guy (Blalock) like that around.

Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted.

by t ball on Jul 17, 2008 10:58 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Aren't we already stuck with Cat

as the DH who can’t hit lefties? I think we are full at that position. I really don’t see spending $6.5 million for something that would be as redundant as having Cat and Blalock on the same team.

I think our odds of trading Cat are about as good as trading Blalock.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 11:01 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I'd just as soon cut Cat

he’s okay for what he is, but we have no need for him at all.

I guess I could see just dumping Blalock to save the cash so you could spend it elsewhere, but I think he’s got enough potential left in his tank that he could seriously bite is in the ball sack if he stays healthy in his contract year next year. Cat doesn’t really have that potential.

It’s basically a no-win situation we’ve got ourselves in with Hank.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

by thedirkatron on Jul 17, 2008 11:07 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Agreed

That’s why I am content with taking a “We’ll take what we can get” type package with Hank. I think some kind of C/C+ reliever arm in AA is a reasonable return. Is that a reasonable guess? Am I aiming too low?

Plaschke: Scioscia, the former Dodgers catcher, is the model manager who has created an atmosphere of winning.
Junior:It's that simple. Mike Scioscia brings a Glade Plug-In labeled "Winning™" into the clubhouse and everyone who breathes it in gains 15 points in average.

by TheBZA on Jul 17, 2008 11:19 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

If you cut Cat

and keep Blalock, you’re basically paying $10.5M for your platoon DH by virtue of exercisign the $6.5M option and eating Cat’s $4M. Is Blalock $6.5M x greater as your platoon DH than Cat?

by robert_d_wilfong on Jul 17, 2008 11:28 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Yep.

You nailed it. I just can’t see re-signing Blalock, when he isn’t a big upgrade over Cat, and you either pay $10.5 for Blalock and releasing Cat, or $4M for Cat.

If you thought Blalock might pay 3B, there might be an argument for re-signing him, but with Chris Davis and Cat under contract, exercising Blalock’s option looks sillier and sillier.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 1:11 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

There is no reason to keep Blalock

and you certainly don’t keep him just because you hate to dump someone for nothing. I have no confidence he will rebuild value, ever. Yes, his value is low, but it is always going to be low. Move on.

Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted.

by t ball on Jul 17, 2008 11:48 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

agrree

Just DFA Catalanotto to make room for Blalock. Maybe just release Frank out of respect.

"An effortless 98" - Scott Gardner after Neftali Feliz's first AA pitch

by RangerMad on Jul 17, 2008 11:58 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Clark again

If the Padres can get something for Tony Clark, then why can’t the Rangers get something for Catalanotto?

Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!

by DerekSTheRed on Jul 17, 2008 12:57 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

yep

and Cat is a lot more versatile than Clark and a better hitter.

Josh Hamilton is better than you.

by Longhorn on Jul 17, 2008 1:00 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

salary

Of course Clark costs a lot less and is a free agent at the end of this year. The Rangers my have to include cash with Cat in order to trade him.

Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!

by DerekSTheRed on Jul 17, 2008 1:08 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

bingo

Greatest Inventions Ever? 1. TiVO, 2. Boobs, 3. Baseball

by willamos2 on Jul 17, 2008 1:58 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

He really isn't more versatile.

Tony Clark could play a lot of positions badly if you forced him to.

"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2008 1:11 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

+1

And, for whatever reason, Tony Clark is looked upon as a “leader”, the kind of guy who makes a clubhouse better.

Cat? He’s just sort of a little quiet guy.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

by thedirkatron on Jul 17, 2008 2:16 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

going into 2009

would it be so bad to have a healthy Milton Bradley playing RF all the time, leaving DH open for a combination of Davis/Blalock, whoever is not at 1B for the day, and maybe Max-Ram, if he’s up and not catching?

compare that scenario to our 2008 opening day of Laird and Stewart rotating at C, with Broussard starting at 1B…

"No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of."

by Walter Sobchak on Jul 17, 2008 3:38 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Wow

gazeelse = gazelle

I’m half retarded this morning.

thediraktron no function coffee well without.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

by thedirkatron on Jul 17, 2008 10:17 AM CDT   0 recs

Haha.

You know, I try not to be a grammar jockey on this board, but that is a horrendous misspelling. Gave me a laugh. :)

"But the point is, [Jeff] Mathis is a bush-league uber douche." -lonestarJon

by ghtd36 on Jul 17, 2008 10:19 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

I thought you were talking about

Gisele Bundchen.

Nothing pithy here. Please move long.

by WyoRanger on Jul 17, 2008 10:32 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

just this morning??

i thought it was all the time!

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 17, 2008 10:33 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

Let's go to the scoreboard:

70 to 48.5 = Ownership

Bwa Ha Ha!

The 40 Trumps All!!!

by thedirkatron on Jul 17, 2008 10:38 AM CDT to parent up   0 recs

hey man

i can’t help the fact