The NL Needs the DH
A number of current MLB controversies have made it clear that the game is moving forward into a new era. One fan tries to find the best balance between past and present.
From http://www.splicetoday.com/sports/the-nl-needs-the-dh
Baseball is an exhilarating yet frustrating mess of contradictions, and this fan is caught in the trap—like millions of other men and women (save George Will, whose pompous moral certitude about the sport is immutable)—of trying to reconcile “purist” instincts with the undeniable improvements in the game over the past several decades. Last weekend, for example, while watching a slew of inter-league contests via the MLB “Extra Innings” package (which, regardless of varying prices depending on your locale and cable provider, costs less for an entire season of televised games than one day at a stadium for a family of four), I finally switched gears and figured it was time for the National League to acquiesce and adopt the still-controversial designated hitter rule.
Heresy, I guess, but what the hell; if you’re a Milwaukee Brewers’ devotee, wouldn’t it be delightful to see the world’s tubbiest vegetarian, Prince Fielder, in the dugout, contemplating his next plate appearance, instead of anchored at first base? One league’s dominance over the other usually runs in cycles, but the N.L. seems mired in a slump that’s likely to run longer than the Great Depression, and this was evident once again over the weekend. Sure, the strategy required of an N.L. manager is more intricate than A.L. counterparts with double-switches and more sacrifice bunts, but the two leagues might be more competitive if older free agents (or crummy fielders) could extend their careers as a DH.
That said, and here’s one of those curveballs, I can’t stand inter-league play, even though it pumps up attendance and allows fans to see star players who were once a mystery aside from the All-Star game (which, of course, has devolved into a meaningless exhibition game instead of a proud showcase) or the World Series. My 13-year-old son, with whom I have the pleasure of sitting next to in our matching easy chairs in the homestead’s television room, adamantly disagrees, but I chalk that up to his participation in a fantasy league with a bunch of school buddies. I just don’t like the disruption of the season’s rhythm, the fake “rivalries” cooked up by MLB schedule makers—sure, the Cubs and White Sox make sense, but the Rockies and Tigers?—for the sake of novelty and profit.
See the rest at http://www.splicetoday.com/sports/the-nl-needs-the-dh
0 recs |
5 comments
Comments
DH
Is the NL the only adult league in the world not to use the DH?
If you want all players that bat to field, then why not go to an 8 man batting order? Watching a pitcher attempt to hit is the worst thing in sports.
by mcgee48c on Jul 2, 2008 10:07 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Hell, the Rangers had an 8 man batting order earlier this year...
Sometimes 7 man when both Botts and Broussard were in the same lineup.
by venturafearsnolan on Jul 2, 2008 10:25 AM CDT up reply actions 0 recs
I definitely think the NL should use the DH.
It’s such a powerdown to have an auto out to end a rally. Granted, some pitchers can hit, but it’s about 2%. I used to be a purist, but the game’s too specialized now. I kinda think it’s similar to the NFL since they now have punters and kickers (instead of one guy doing both), and a deep snapper (often the backup center), KR & PR (that are commonly 4th WRs or nickel-backs).
by Apes and Androids on Jul 2, 2008 11:41 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I prefer the pitcher hitting
But then I like the strategy around it…. how pitchers pitch around guys to pitch to the hitter, pinch hitting, double switches, it seems like a more tactical game than the AL.
by venturafearsnolan on Jul 2, 2008 2:55 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
















