The Red Sox covet Teagarden
The Rangers are one of the only teams with catching depth in Jarrod Saltalamacchia, Gerald Laird, Taylor Teagarden and Max Ramirez, and nearly eight teams have been trying to deal for one. The Yankees are one of several clubs in on Laird, and Boston is in on Teagarden.
This is much more realistic than the Michael Young talk.
This is the most specific rumor I've seen relating to Boston's desire for not just a Rangers catcher, but Taylor Teagarden specifically. Gammons is pretty reliable especially when it comes to the Red Sox since he has so many sources there so I believe his claim that the Sox want him. Now the question becomes this:
Let me first say that I think Teagarden has the most value out of any of the Rangers' catchers and he is the one Rangers catcher I really don't want to trade. Saying that, is Michael Bowden enough for Taylor Teagarden? I honestly don't think he is. I think the Rangers should hold out for Bowden + another arm (Hagadone)? I would also ask about trading Guardado and Teagarden for Clay Buchholz however I do not believe he can be had, even for those two. If so, that's a no-brainer though. Thoughts?
Also, if Teagarden is moved to Boston and Laird is traded as well to say Florida, would you want to keep Max and Salty as our permanent catchers or would you instead be in favor of moving one of those two in the offseason?
2 recs |
252
comments
| Add your comment
Comments
IF nothing happens
with any player i’m going to be severely disappointed.
Josh Hamilton is better than you.
by Longhorn on
Jul 29, 2008 1:29 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
By the way
out of the 4, i really hope we keep Teagarden.
Josh Hamilton is better than you.
by Longhorn on
Jul 29, 2008 1:29 PM CDT
reply
1 recs
I agree
And it doesn’t surprise me that he is the one that Boston would target.
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Jul 29, 2008 1:30 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
re:
TE: Who should I go after?
BJ: Duh, it’s easy…Teagarden.
TE: K.
Josh Hamilton is better than you.
by Longhorn on
Jul 29, 2008 1:32 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
LOL
"Sooner or later, prospects kill you, because you hang onto them." - Greggo, 11/22/2005
by Agreen07 on
Jul 29, 2008 1:33 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
actually
the one guy that I hope we keep is Max, and I’d like to see him paired with one of the better defensive catchers – preferably Teagarden.
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Jul 29, 2008 1:48 PM CDT
up
reply
1 recs
+2
Feliz and Hurley. The 1-2 punch of the future
by Steal Home on
Jul 29, 2008 3:03 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Tea
One has to think that his value is higher than any of the catchers right now. I still think MaxRam has the most potential at the plate, but I think he’s truly most valuable if he can platoon with Teagarden.
That said, Teagarden is probably the only one that could return someone truly special (and I think it would take that, with Tom “I love UT” Hicks running the show…)
by JBImaknee on
Jul 29, 2008 1:32 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
what happens when a guy is traded
who is on the olympic roster? Would they be trying to get him for next year?
by Goyogringo on
Jul 29, 2008 1:54 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
end of this year and beyond
He’ll be back in September
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on
Jul 29, 2008 1:55 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
yeah
with that platoon. we could put maxram behind the plate when team that doesnt steal much is the opponent then have maxram at DH the other times
Feliz and Hurley. The 1-2 punch of the future
by Steal Home on
Jul 29, 2008 3:05 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
+1
But Tea for Bowden wouldn’t upset me at all.
by philkid3 on
Jul 29, 2008 3:08 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
laird
why is everyone so down on laird? if all these all teams want him, why should the rangers trade him? he is a proven major league catcher.
by un_ambassador on
Jul 29, 2008 1:32 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
Why keep the guy that is going to cost the most if you can get close to replacement value for alot less with alot more potential?
by laxtonto on
Jul 29, 2008 1:35 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
I love how Laird is playing this season
but I’m not 100% sure his bat is for real. I wouldn’t mind keeping him long term but I think we have him right now at his peak value (assuming his hammy is 100%).
by northtexan95 on
Jul 29, 2008 1:54 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
his bat may not be good but hes great behind the plate
and if we’re not gonna have good pitching we need good defense to help out our pitching
Feliz and Hurley. The 1-2 punch of the future
by Steal Home on
Jul 29, 2008 3:12 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Right
but that defense really matters only in LF, CF and SS (and 2B, maybe).
Laird isn’t great at blocking the plate or calling a game, He’s got a good arm, but that’s the extent of his contributions defensively.
by FirebatM3 on
Jul 29, 2008 3:14 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
because we have a heavy surplus at one position and a heavy deficet at another
and the other guys are locked up longer.
the preceding post is not nearly as negative or insulting as you think it is
by DSheppard on
Jul 29, 2008 1:46 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
I don't know that many people are down on Laird.
They just realize we have a ton of depth at catcher, so if someone wants to give us a nifty prospect for him, it’s a good move.
by philkid3 on
Jul 29, 2008 3:13 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Bowden doesn't impress me.
How about Hagadone and Reddick? Too much?
Josh Hamilton is better than you.
by Longhorn on
Jul 29, 2008 1:35 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
How about we just don't trade TT?
Ian Kinsler has finally earned the right to be the third of my co-favorite players.
by utlonghorn24 on
Jul 29, 2008 1:39 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
i agree
that’s for laird, if they want him…
Josh Hamilton is better than you.
by Longhorn on
Jul 29, 2008 1:41 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
homer
W: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
by hubcityraider on
Jul 29, 2008 1:47 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Bowden is much further along in the development process
in AAA now, while Hagadone is still in A-ball. JD has stated that he wants pitching that is near mlb ready or mlb already. Bowden has received mixed reviews despite his success though so I’m unsure as well.
"Sooner or later, prospects kill you, because you hang onto them." - Greggo, 11/22/2005
by Agreen07 on
Jul 29, 2008 1:40 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
I can't see
JD trading both Laird and Teagarden.
"An effortless 98" - Scott Gardner after Neftali Feliz's first AA pitch
by RangerMad on
Jul 29, 2008 1:39 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
I don't see him trading either..
they are still (at least in perception) on the fringe of competiting for a playoff spot. For a starting ML catcher, Larid is still cheap and fairly competitive statistically wise with the league norms. that is why so many teams want him. I don’t thing they really want to run the rest of the season with Salty based on what he’s shown so far.
Now, IF either Laird or TT can bring back a 1-3 starter as part of a package, they should do it, but if they will trade their most reliable and productive (at least currently) starting catcher when it’s 105 and there are empty seats is another matter entirely.
Jeff Henn is an idiot.
by Red Shoe Fan on
Jul 29, 2008 1:44 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
we are not in the playoff race
it was a stretch at 7 and a half.
its dead now.
and we certainly arnt beating 2 of 3 of yankees/sox/rays and then the runner up in the central AND oakland.
its over.
the preceding post is not nearly as negative or insulting as you think it is
by DSheppard on
Jul 29, 2008 1:47 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
oh i agree fully...
Notice that I said “at least in perception”. This team is done for the playoffs this year, but the franchise as a whole is in a very good place for the future i.e. 2009-2011.
I just believe that at the end of the day, the perception of the common ticket-buying fan will factor in to things too much in the short term. I’m not saying it’s right, but I do think that is what will happen.
They shold keep in mind the hopefully not-too-distant day when RBIA and its neighbor Jerry-Wold can both host very competitive teams that in really in pursuit of a championship.
Jeff Henn is an idiot.
by Red Shoe Fan on
Jul 29, 2008 1:51 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
its not over
Feliz and Hurley. The 1-2 punch of the future
by Steal Home on
Jul 29, 2008 3:13 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Here's the deal...
The one catcher I want the Rangers to keep is Teagarden. If they want him they will have to blow me out of the water- Teagarden for Masterson and Bowden
by baylorbear82 on
Jul 29, 2008 1:44 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
no no no
never never never never.
you jump on Bowden for Teagarden.
"You can't reason with your heart; it has its own laws, and thumps about things which the intellect scorns." - from A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court, by Mark Twain
by dstar442005 on
Jul 29, 2008 1:51 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
No,
You don’t. Replace TT with Salty and you have my attention.
Ian Kinsler has finally earned the right to be the third of my co-favorite players.
by utlonghorn24 on
Jul 29, 2008 1:59 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
It's not a fricking UT bias.
All of you who think that are ignorant.
Ian Kinsler has finally earned the right to be the third of my co-favorite players.
by utlonghorn24 on
Jul 29, 2008 2:53 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Hit 'em Wreck 'em.
"Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise."
by HaoleKlaus on
Jul 29, 2008 4:07 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Teagarden is the only one of the group...
that I’d really be disappointed to see leave…
by N41D on
Jul 29, 2008 1:53 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
Max Ramirez
is going to be an impact run producer, if you aren’t disappointed when he leaves – you will be when he is raking for somebody else.
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Jul 29, 2008 2:18 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
But is he a catcher?
Or am I trading a guy that will be a DH a couple of years from now? If he sticks behind the plate, it obviously makes it more difficult to swallow. But I just don’t know if I see it.
by N41D on
Jul 29, 2008 2:41 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
He's going to be a middle of the order masher
Max has huge value if he sticks behind the plate or not. A comparable minor league masher was just traded for CC Sabathia. Max is the RH power bat that this team needs going forward and I wouldn’t move him unless it was for a bonafide ace caliber minor league arm, like say a top 20 pitching prospect in all of baseball.
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Jul 29, 2008 2:46 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
word
Max is everything you’d want from a hitter, high LD%, good FB tendencies, performance, batting eye, high average and now good power. I’m not sure he’s not our best hitting prospect (and yes, that includes Davis and Smoak)
by FirebatM3 on
Jul 29, 2008 2:58 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
yeah
I have wondered if Max was a better hitting prospect than CD, but after seeing CD’s debut it is hard to say that anybody is a better offensive prospect.
Anyway, I think we both value Max similarly.
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Jul 29, 2008 3:03 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
he looked pretty good
when he was up with us. you’ve got to think he can get better…
"No, Donny, these men are nihilists, there's nothing to be afraid of."
by Walter Sobchak on
Jul 29, 2008 3:54 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
I'm all for...
trading Laird and Salty…
and keeping Max and Tea…only under LIMITED circumstances should those guys be leaving.
I'd love for part of the "new look" to be a return to the red uniforms of the 1990s. - Ian Kinsler
by ortonius on
Jul 29, 2008 1:56 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
+ Juan billion.
Ian Kinsler has finally earned the right to be the third of my co-favorite players.
by utlonghorn24 on
Jul 29, 2008 2:00 PM CDT
up
reply
1 recs
Tea
still has the durability question. i say hang onto Salty, or both. Deal Laird.
Pitch counts are for the ignorant.
by SteveP on
Jul 29, 2008 4:01 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
los angeles?
I’m in L.A. We had a (maybe 5.8) earthquake about 5 minutes ago. I’m in a highrise and, man, it was freaky.
by Hubris on
Jul 29, 2008 1:57 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
awww I missed the biggest one in L A in years..
I’m in Chicago. The biggest one I ever felt in L A was a 4.2 and that was over in 2 seconds. I’d kinda like to feel a real one as long as it’s not too big :) just so I can say I experienced a decent sized one.
There is no status, except for me. Because I am who I am.
MILES
by LAMuscleFag on
Jul 29, 2008 2:02 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
looks like
it was centered around Diamond Bar. Frankly I am unimpressed with 5.8. It didn’t last too long, but the building swayed for about a minute.
by Hubris on
Jul 29, 2008 2:04 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Yikes
I hope you’re on one of the lower floors.. I’d be bolting out of that building soooo fast.
Imagine Uncle Milty after he heard the Royals announcer talking shit about him.
There is no status, except for me. Because I am who I am.
MILES
by LAMuscleFag on
Jul 29, 2008 2:10 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
43rd floor
of a 51 floor building. It’s not the first earthquake I’ve been in, but it’s the first since I’ve been in L.A. and it’s the biggest I’ve been in.
by Hubris on
Jul 29, 2008 2:14 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
oh shit..
so much for bolting out of the bldg… you may want to wear a construction hat to work the next few days.
There is no status, except for me. Because I am who I am.
MILES
by LAMuscleFag on
Jul 29, 2008 2:27 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
I'm in San Diego
Getting ready for lunch as the room shook for about 20 seconds. I’ve never felt one close like you just did though. Don’t know if I’d like anything more than a little shake
by JBImaknee on
Jul 29, 2008 2:47 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
California!
The state that greets you with a firm shake!
by northtexan95 on
Jul 29, 2008 2:37 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
was hoping
for a 10.0. Only shot I see of the Rangers making the playoffs this year.
"And I stopped beating my wife just a couple of weeks ago." -John McCain
by DJCahill on
Jul 29, 2008 4:29 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Angels are in Boston.
Josh Hamilton is better than you.
by Longhorn on
Jul 29, 2008 4:45 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Anaheim needs to not exist anyways
win-win situation
by FirebatM3 on
Jul 29, 2008 5:33 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
What are the advantages and disadvantages
of tyring to trade 2 of these guys during the winter meetings? Would we be more likely to get better prospect packages then or now?
by Goyogringo on
Jul 29, 2008 1:59 PM CDT
reply
0 recs
I think you have to put forth your best efforts
To get rid of one right now. Preferably Laird, as his name is the one popping up the most it seems like. I say you package Salty in a big deal over the offseason, because I think that is a more realistic time to better gauge his value and get him out of here in a big deal for a SP. But that’s me.
I also think TT is the C of the future, and I’ve said it from day one (and NOT because he is a UT product). So in my mind, he and Max are the two you keep, and the other two need to go. In my opinion, Laird is the one that we really push hard to trade by Thursday.
Ian Kinsler has finally earned the right to be the third of my co-favorite players.
by utlonghorn24 on
Jul 29, 2008 2:02 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
winter meetings
Also during the off season more teams are involved then just at the trading deadline. More teams bidding usually means a higher return.
Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!
by DerekSTheRed on
Jul 29, 2008 2:09 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
the only guy with more value now
I would imagine, is Laird. It is funny that Teagarden’s name has even come up this summer. As for Salty, I would imagine teams are just trying to buy low on him.
by clark on
Jul 29, 2008 2:10 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
I guess that is another factor
JD has to consider: Can I get a better offer (than this pretty good offer) for one of these guys during the offseason? If the answer is yes then I hope they do their dealing during the break.
by Goyogringo on
Jul 29, 2008 2:13 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
BUT
at the winter meetings many teams are willing to go into the season being overly optimistic about the options they already have in place. Seems to me the returns are always higher at the trade deadline.
W: "Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."
by hubcityraider on
Jul 29, 2008 2:34 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
It is also a place
where teams are most overly optimistic about their own prospects, making it harder to get young players back.
by FirebatM3 on
Jul 29, 2008 2:55 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Deadline..
Teams are often in desperation mode at the deadline. Sure there are less teams bidding (usually), but those teams are already locked in a pennant race and their backs are often against the wall in terms of positional need. I tend to think the better deals are made by sellers at the deadline. Additionally, there is often the half year service time difference for soon to be FA’s (ie Atl got Tex for 2 pennant races instead of one had a deal been made this winter)
by Topgun22 on
Jul 29, 2008 3:12 PM CDT
up
reply
0 recs
Ha!
Both Yankees and Red Sox are desperate for catchers. Posada and Varitek’s days as everyday catchers are dwindling. Varitek’s a FA after this season. Posada’s done for the year. And which team is stocked with young catchers? Us! I think we’re in pretty good position to trade at least one of those for some good young pitching.
I’d hate to lose TT and MaxRam, though.

