Opening for a catcher in Kansas City.
http://www.kansascity.com/sports/royals/story/771971.html
It looks like the Royals might be a good match for the Rangers in the trade market. With Olivo not returning and Buck only passable as a starter at this point, should the Rangers offer up Salty or Laird plus others for Greinke and others?
I like Jamey Newberg's offer ideas http://www.newbergreport.com/article1.asp and would probably be OK with sending them Salty, Hurley, Mayberry, Arias and any of the players Jamey mentions as a fifth player for Greinke and Ramon Ramirez.
Would you trade with KC or try a different partner? I have really liked Jamey's trade scenarios lately. Upgrading the starting pitching would upgrade the performance of even THIS bullpen... even though I think it has a couple holes regardless.
I like Rupe, Wright, Francisco, Wilson, Mendoza, and Nippert in the bullpen but would get Madrigal some more experience in Oklahoma City next year. Add Ramon Ramirez to that bullpen group and Greinke as one of two upgrades in the rotation and you've got something going.
Thoughts?
8 recs |
177
comments
Comments
Greinke...
is not under team control long enough for me to justify sending a large package.
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on Aug 29, 2008 1:19 PM CDT 0 recs
could you ask for...
…a window to negotiate an extention?
I blame it not on Ron Washington, but on society. Society is to blame. And Ron Washington. ~Ken Tremendous on Ron Washington sac bunting in the 11th vs LAA
by ivysafety39 on
Aug 29, 2008 1:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
You could...
…but I don’t know how feasible that is. I think speculating about making trades contingent on getting a window to negotiate an extension are even more of an exercise in futility than speculating about trades in general.
by Adam J. Morris on
Aug 29, 2008 1:23 PM CDT
up
0 recs
thanks for the confidence boost.
I blame it not on Ron Washington, but on society. Society is to blame. And Ron Washington. ~Ken Tremendous on Ron Washington sac bunting in the 11th vs LAA
by ivysafety39 on
Aug 29, 2008 1:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Greinke comes to Texas
Texas hits well behind him
Greinke wins games
Texas wins games
Greinke resigns with Texas
by oc on
Aug 29, 2008 1:51 PM CDT
up
0 recs
No, no!
That can’t happen! He only has two years before free agency!
He HAS to leave!
by Jamey Newberg on
Aug 29, 2008 1:54 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I mean, c'mon....
There’s no chance we’d Vernon Wells him before his deal is up and make him a long-term proposal he’d be foolish to turn down!
by Jamey Newberg on
Aug 29, 2008 1:55 PM CDT
up
0 recs
all due respect, Mr. Newberg...
…i just don’t see how Jon Daniels could weasel Zack Greinke out of Dayton’s hands without giving up Chris Davis.
by oc on
Aug 29, 2008 1:57 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Funny....
…how two-thirds of the (more than 100) fans I’ve heard from think I’m crazy for offering the players I proposed…
…while the other third (like you) think it would take significantly more to get ZG.
Almost nobody thinks it’s a reasonable offer, but there’s far from a consensus as to whether it’s way too much or way too little.
by Jamey Newberg on
Aug 29, 2008 2:00 PM CDT
up
0 recs
as i explained in a previous post...
…i think Davis, Salty, and Hurley could get us the Z, man.
i know that seems like a lot, but, i think that’s what it would take.
i can live with one less bat if it means i have a young, top-flight pitcher at the top of my rotation.
Grienke is something the Rangers haven’t had in a very, very long time.
by oc on
Aug 29, 2008 2:08 PM CDT
up
0 recs
i think newberg is right on man
If come to see that Ranger fans tend to UNDERestimate their prospects a lot more than OVERestimate them. You tend to see plenty of the Chris Young, Adrian Gonzalez , travis hafner, ryan ludwick, stories, and the overestimation of the prospects in other systems compared to ours, i.e. the brandon mccarthy trade (which is actually having some good returns on our end now). All in all though, i think that the rangers have a better chance to give up less in our eyes to attract teams who value our players.
baseBALLIN!
by kevzta on
Aug 29, 2008 3:09 PM CDT
up
0 recs
lol
I seriously don’t understand how any discussion for Greinke has to even mention Chris Davis. Personally, I think that deal is way too much and would prefer to stay the course with these players or offer a lesser deal.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg1 on
Aug 30, 2008 11:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Its a pitcher.
Pitchers dont seem to be big fans of signing with texas for reasonable contracts. If you are going to give him an unreasonable contract, why not just give that to a free agent now and avoid giving up all the talent.
Id rather just keep hurley and deal the salty/mayberry/arias part of the deal for a good pitching prospect and roll the dice on the prospect or hurley panning out.
Although the deal i objected to was davis/salty/hurley. i like your deal more. Although I think worrying about 2 years left is an extremely valid argument… I just have no confidence at all that we would extend a greinke type.
the preceding post is not nearly as negative or insulting as you think it is
by DSheppard on
Aug 29, 2008 3:03 PM CDT
up
0 recs
My point was that...
…speculating about making a trade contingent on getting an exclusive negotiating window with the player you are acquiring, particularly a guy a ways away from free agency and who has no connection with Texas, seems far-fetched.
by Adam J. Morris on
Aug 29, 2008 2:05 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree.
I wasn’t taking that point on. I just cringe at the argument that a player only has two years left on his deal and so he’s not worth trading for. I’m not suggesting that we’d need an extension window.
by Jamey Newberg on
Aug 29, 2008 2:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Aren't...
…the only pitchers who are conceivably available and under control for more than Greinke almost necessarily under long-term FA contracts, most of which are horribly team-unfriendly?
I can think of one candidate with less service than Greinke that I’m going to write about next time.
by Jamey Newberg on
Aug 29, 2008 1:39 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I think it's a trade-off
You can get guys who have less service time. They’re just going to be more of a risk, guys who haven’t established themselves as core starters.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 1:42 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Name all the P's with less service time...
…than ZG whose upside you equate to his. You can’t list guys like Kershaw or Lester who obviously won’t be traded.
by Jamey Newberg on
Aug 29, 2008 1:48 PM CDT
up
0 recs
a couple that come to mind
Danks
Volquez
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Aug 29, 2008 2:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Danks was just a prospect
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 3:10 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I thought he was asking
for ML pitchers with less service time and equal or greater upside than Greinke.
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Aug 29, 2008 3:57 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Do you think he's gettable now?
I tend to think he’d be extremely hard to pry away.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 4:22 PM CDT
up
0 recs
no
I guess I was answering the question, but in a way that doesn’t really pertain to the subject at hand.
But I agree with what I think you were trying to allude to below, that what we really need is to grab a breakout pitcher, before the breakout. Of course, that isn’t an easy task.
Warner Madrigal makes Ezequiel Astacio look downright handsome.
by tricer on
Aug 29, 2008 4:32 PM CDT
up
0 recs
x
I agree with what I think you were trying to allude to below, that what we really need is to grab a breakout pitcher, before the breakout.
That was the rationale behind trading for McCarthy (and before the flaming starts, there were people other than Rangers management who thought he was a breakout guy).
by Adam J. Morris on
Aug 29, 2008 4:36 PM CDT
up
0 recs
One catch
In that deal the Rangers were presumably picking up just one year of development. I’m not aware of any scenario here where we’re talking about trading away a guy with 70 AAA innings under his belt for a guy with a year of starting in the majors under his. Now, at best you’d be talking about dealing Feliz or Holland who have fewer AA innings than that and little to no HA time. When he was dealt, Danks had 350 innings from HA and up. These two will be a little north and a little south of 50.
And after them you’re talking about lower level guys or lower ceiling guys. We don’t really have a top notch guy as advanced as Danks was. I think that’s the big difference.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 4:52 PM CDT
up
0 recs
That would be ideal
I wasn’t really arguing one route over another, just in terms of strategy for Texas’ situation. I just don’t agree with Jamey’s assertion that the only way to add a quality, young major league starter is to trade for one with two or fewer years before free agency.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 4:47 PM CDT
up
0 recs
It gets pretty subjective
to make a judgment on whether pitchers have as much upside as Greinke and at the same time wouldn’t fall in the category of “won’t be traded.” It’s sort of like when you thought that Francisco Liriano who was about the #2 pitching prospect in baseball at the time was a realistic return for Soriano and I didn’t. It was pretty hard for me to demonstrate to you that he wasn’t (especially since the Rangers seemed to be floating it out there), and likewise you to me that he was.
Also, I’m not one who thinks that these guys are readily available. How many teams can actually deal top under control pitchers? You almost always either have to have a situation like the Twins did, where their guy was not proven and they had about six others who were in the same range (obviously rare) or this approaching Greinke one, where he becomes less and less valuable to the Royals (and the Rangers) as he approaches FA because they’re not quite ready to win.
I can throw out some names like Telegraph did or add guys like Charlie Morton and Ryan Tucker, but the evidence you’re looking for of the type I’m referring to is better illustrated by rewinding just a few months. What young major league starting pitchers somewhere near Greinke’s talent level have been dealt or were known to be discussed in deals recently? Edinson Volquez, Matt Garza, Andrew Miller, Jair Jurrjens, and Gavin Floyd are some who were dealt. Joe Saunders, Cliff Lee, Ervin Santana, Mike Pelfrey, Ricky Nolasco, and Scott Baker were widely discussed but didn’t wind up being dealt. A few of those guys aren’t as talented as Greinke, but are performing at a really high level themselves, comparable to or better than his.
If I’d given you those names a year ago, you would have groaned at most of them, yet the majority of them are now in Greinke’s class. It’s not an easy way to go, but this is the trade-off for extra years. You’re basically talking about major leaguers who are still prospects.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 3:09 PM CDT
up
0 recs
isn't it a little easier of a trade-off knowing that in two years, our prospects will have developed further?
we already know that there will be restrictions on free-agent signings.
and, i certainly don’t think the Rangers fanbase would be too pleased trading for another Brandon McCarthy.
by oc on
Aug 29, 2008 4:58 PM CDT
up
0 recs
isn’t it a little easier of a trade-off knowing that in two years, our prospects will have developed further?
That’s where the issue of the details of the deal comes into play. If they don’t give up anyone that hurts, yes I agree. If they give up someone, like Davis, Feliz or Holland, who would likely have been instrumental in them being good after those two years are up, no.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 5:13 PM CDT
up
0 recs
i can live with Davis being dealt, because of Smoak.
…short-sighted as that may seem…
ugh… i have tired-head.
this is the last i will speak about Greinke.
by oc on
Aug 29, 2008 5:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Liriano.
"Either we need to re-calibrate our rectangle, or Alfonzo Marquez is not having a good night." - Josh Lewin
by utlonghorn24 on
Aug 29, 2008 4:16 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Scott Baker
Kevin Slowey
Jamie Shields
Matt Cain
Max Scherzer
One of the Florida Trio
Clay Buchholz
Dustin McGowan
by FirebatM3 on
Aug 29, 2008 6:36 PM CDT
up
0 recs
wouldn't it make sense to grab a more established starter while the less established starters already here continue to develop?
by oc on
Aug 29, 2008 1:48 PM CDT
up
0 recs
im not surprised that you might disagree
but im surprised you think the thought is so ridiculous that it deserves open mocking.
the preceding post is not nearly as negative or insulting as you think it is
by DSheppard on
Aug 29, 2008 5:38 PM CDT
up
0 recs
When in rome...
It's filed under 'D'... for donut.
by NoNameOnCard on
Aug 31, 2008 1:14 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Heh
nail on the head. This place even drags Jamey into the mud on occasion.
O Freunde, nicht diese Töne!
Sondern laßt uns angenehmere anstimmen,
und freudenvollere.
by t ball on
Aug 31, 2008 10:26 PM CDT
up
0 recs
It does if the price is reasonable and
you control them long enough to think that you will actually have a team around them in time. Two years is a little dicey. I do think that they can win in 2010, though, if they make the right moves around the one to get the prime pitcher. It’s just right on the edge for me, and it really becomes about price as to whether it makes sense, as I said earlier.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 3:15 PM CDT
up
0 recs
i know his names been thrown around...
…and he is less established, though i think he has more upside… but what are everyone’s feelings on the much maligned homer bailey vs greinke?
I blame it not on Ron Washington, but on society. Society is to blame. And Ron Washington. ~Ken Tremendous on Ron Washington sac bunting in the 11th vs LAA
by ivysafety39 on
Aug 29, 2008 1:59 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I like Bailey
as a low risk/high reward type trade only. In his brief time in the majors, he hasn’t shown the promise that I think everyone thought he had when drafted. Granted he is still young, but you have to wonder if the promote and yank process that Cincy has undertaken on him has maybe taken a toll on his psyche. If that is the case that JD et al feel may be present, I think you look at a Salty + Brandon Puffer type would be the ideal trade.
This would still allow for multiple propects to be peddled in a trade for a starter with 3-4 years of service time with the ability to be a 1/2 starter… say maybe a trade with MIN for Perkins or Slowey? Something along the lines of Hurley/Harrison + JMJ + Whittleman?
"But the major difference is where Showalter tried to overthink everything Washington at times seems like he isn't thinking at all. " - rentz
by hillcrest on
Aug 29, 2008 3:23 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Bailey
I was hoping someone would mention him. If the price is right, I think Bailey would be an excellent pickup and I would be absolutely thrilled if JD could get him without giving up one of the big name pitching prospects.
by jcir454 on
Aug 29, 2008 3:34 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I would sure hope so.
I don’t think there’s anyone in baseball who would choose to keep Bailey if they were offered either Holland or Feliz.
In other words, Holland > Bailey. Feliz > Bailey.
It's filed under 'D'... for donut.
by NoNameOnCard on
Aug 31, 2008 1:18 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I don't think a lot more than a Salty will be required
People always say Salty+Andrus+Hurley, or something like that. I think he’d come to Texas with a much cheaper package – Salty + someone like Vallejo + a distant projectible arm like Neil Ramirez or Martin Perez
by JBImaknee on Aug 29, 2008 1:39 PM CDT 0 recs
Screw that!
TOO much.
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
"If you ain't got no money, ain't nobody calls you honey," Bo Diddley
by Rodney on Aug 29, 2008 1:44 PM CDT 0 recs
KC could be a match
but I think that you might be overstating the difference between, say, Laird and Buck. Buck isn’t anything special, but how much of an upgrade is that really?
Laird 07/08
.224 .278 .349
.284 .337 .417
Buck
.222 .308 .429
.224 .293 .370
Laird is having the better offensive year this year, but he is injury prone and is probably regarded by KC as a lesser defender. Maybe they view one of the younger guys as having more upside.
I wonder if Cortes for one of the other catchers doesn’t make some sense.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on Aug 29, 2008 1:46 PM CDT 0 recs
Hey Z
Are you as intrigued by Cortes as I am? From what I’ve read he has a “power” repertoire which may be playable at RBiA. Laird may be able to bring back Cortes + Lisson possibly.
"But the major difference is where Showalter tried to overthink everything Washington at times seems like he isn't thinking at all. " - rentz
by hillcrest on
Aug 29, 2008 3:25 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I agree on the first part
But I don’t believe for a second that Laird nets you Cortes. If he did, they should have done that already.
Offense doesn't doubt me, but my first and primemost thing is defense and punt return and kickoff return
by zywica on
Aug 29, 2008 3:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
I don't understand Jamey's infatuation with ..
.. Greinke. Go after a free agent, or trade away position prospects, but let’s keep all our pitching prospects and see how they turn out. We don’t need another Eaton or McCarthy situation where the pitching we send away in the trade outperforms the pitching we get in return.
by mattrpav on Aug 29, 2008 1:52 PM CDT 0 recs
Here we go again
I think Sheets, Sabathia, and Burnett would be obvious upgrades to this team’s rotation. Some people have thrown around names like Garland, Perez and Lowe, but I have no interest in giving any of those guys a long term deal.
by jcir454 on
Aug 29, 2008 2:10 PM CDT
up
0 recs
OK.
Sheets, Sabathia, Burnett: Fine, but we aren’t getting C.C., and Sheets will get more years and more money than he should. Burnett probably will, too.
Garland, Perez, Lowe: Agree, not interested.
by Jamey Newberg on
Aug 29, 2008 2:13 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Sheets and Burnett
What is the most that you would give those two guys, in terms of money and years?
by Adam J. Morris on
Aug 29, 2008 2:22 PM CDT
up
0 recs
You aint asking me, but I like to hear myself talk
Sheets: 4 yr 15 per
Burnett: 3 yr 12 per
by Telegraph on
Aug 29, 2008 2:29 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Burnett
The contract he would be opting out of would be for more than that 12 mil so why would he opt out for less money? He will get at a minimum 15 per.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on
Aug 29, 2008 2:33 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Laugh Out Loud
My guesses on what they’ll get:
Sheets: 5/90
Burnett: 4/60
And both of those are probably low end estimates.
The 40 Trumps All!!!
by thedirkatron on
Aug 29, 2008 3:07 PM CDT
up
0 recs
the team that gives Sheets
5 and 90 (or more) will rue the day.
by clark on
Aug 29, 2008 3:12 PM CDT
up
0 recs
The most I would give them...
Sheets: 4 / 68
Burnett: 4 / 60
I really don’t like throwing out contract values, but I think that is the most in which I would give those guys. For sheets, if he tries to squeeze out one more year, and the Rangers are the last 2 or 3 teams he’s considering, then I’d probably break down and give him a 5 year deal similar to Millwood’s.
by jcir454 on
Aug 29, 2008 2:45 PM CDT
up
0 recs
What about Brad Penny?
or Oliver Perez. Not to mention that someone from Toronto may be moved because that team needs lots of parts besides one of their starters.
by Hull Fan on
Aug 29, 2008 8:40 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Perez
is a name I would be interested in looking into signing.
"Either we need to re-calibrate our rectangle, or Alfonzo Marquez is not having a good night." - Josh Lewin
by utlonghorn24 on
Aug 29, 2008 11:25 PM CDT
up
0 recs
i think someone...
…shat in Jamey’s cheerios this morning…. you’re a man on a mission!
I blame it not on Ron Washington, but on society. Society is to blame. And Ron Washington. ~Ken Tremendous on Ron Washington sac bunting in the 11th vs LAA
by ivysafety39 on Aug 29, 2008 1:58 PM CDT 1 recs
If that's the case
then someone mess up his dinner, should really add to the color commentary
by Taylor on
Aug 29, 2008 2:03 PM CDT
up
1 recs
Boston
I still like the idea of going after one of Boston’s big name guys. Buchholz, Masterson, Bowden. I think we can get these guys and control them for much longer.
by Blev2 on Aug 29, 2008 2:19 PM CDT 0 recs
Bowden
He’s projected as a #3 or #4 type. Ditto Masterson. Buchholz is the only one who really projects as a legit #1/#2, and he’s got a ton of issues right now.
by Adam J. Morris on
Aug 29, 2008 2:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Those issues
might mean they actually consider trading him, which is good otherwise they wouldn’t even discuss him. Some sort of package centered around TT, which looks like the catcher they like the most, and some low arms would be great.
by phina on
Aug 29, 2008 2:40 PM CDT
up
0 recs
i am tired of hearing
if a guy is a projected 1 or 2 or 3 or 4, because more often than not those projections are wrong. Danks was supposed to be a mid-rotation guy at best in the eyes of most, as was Joe Saunders. Look at the A’s pitching staff. That entire staff is made up of guys who projected of back end guys, at best. Meanwhile, guys with truly elite stuff can go either way, sometimes due to mechanics (Bailey) or injury (Liriano).
Injury risk alone is enough to render any pitcher overvalued on a purely speculative basis.
I would rather make one for one deals (or close to it) with Florida and/or Boston using catching and middle infield depth to bring in guys like Masterson or Bowden or Josh Johnson or Ricky Nolasco (I know the Marlins kids may be a cut above the Sox kids I listed) than put all my eggs in one two year window of a kid who has been inconsistent throughout his career.
by clark on
Aug 29, 2008 3:21 PM CDT
up
0 recs
Josh Johnson
on that note, Josh Johnson is a big, ground out/strike out righty who happens to share a birthday with Nolan Ryan (which of course gives them an unbreakable bond). I wonder what it would take to get him in a Rangers uniform. They can’t pay for all these young arms going forward, and they have a bunch of guys due for a big raise.


