Draft picks, slotting, and connecting the dots
There was an article last month about the Washington Nationals taking a hard line on signing bonus slotting for draftees:
With just more than a month to go before the Aug. 15 deadline, the Nationals still do not have any of their first five picks from the June draft in the fold. And according to a source close to one of those picks, the team could have trouble signing several of them.
The source said the Nationals front office has been given a directive by ownership not to give any of the picks a larger signing bonus than MLB's slot system recommends. All of those picks are believed to be looking for above-slot signing bonuses.
"I spoke with [scouting director] Dana Brown recently, and he sounded absolutely devastated," the source said. "I'm actually kind of stunned they're doing this."
According to the source, the team is prepared to take "a hard line" with first-rounder Aaron Crow. "It's 'If he doesn't want to play for this, we'll take the 10th pick next year,'" the source said, referring to the compensatory selection Washington would get if it did not sign Crow, who was taken ninth in this spring's draft.
Which I thought about when I read this story today:
Major League Baseball investigators are looking into accusations that several New York Yankees prospects from the Dominican Republic were forced to kick back portions of their signing bonuses to one or more team employees, several sources told ESPN.
The revelation is one of several developments in an ongoing investigation of a financial scandal involving the signing of players from the Dominican Republic. Last week, the Red Sox's Dominican scouting supervisor, Pablo Lantigua, was fired after MLB investigators confronted him about allegedly skimming signing bonuses, according to an MLB source. Sources also told ESPN that the investigation is expected to implicate roughly 20 people on "a handful" of teams before it is complete. Investigators also have expanded their probe into Venezuela, where many major league clubs have player academies. "Things are coming to a head," one source familiar with MLB's investigation said.* * *
One source briefed on MLB investigators' findings said he believed "less than a half-dozen" teams would be implicated, including the Yankees, Red Sox, Nationals and White Sox.
The 20 or so employees, based in both the United States and the Dominican Republic, either received money or were aware of others who did, the source said. Sources said FBI agents have not traveled to the Dominican, and contrary to media reports, have limited their probe thus far to allegations surrounding fired White Sox official David Wilder, Washington Nationals general manager Jim Bowden and Nationals special assistant Jose Rijo.
I can't imagine much, if anything, is going to happen to the ChiSox organization, since the main guy in their organization involved with the scandal is cooperating with the FBI, and (more importantly) Jerry Reinsdorf is one of Bud Selig's top stooges among the MLB owners.
But the Nats? They are a little different. The Nationals are a new ownership group, and got a reputation last year for busting slotting on signing bonuses (despite the fact that, other than Jake McGeary, they didn't really go too overboard in above-slot bonuses).
Since the first article came out, they've signed one guy, their 2nd rounder, to a $1.1 million bonus, but he's a two-sport athlete, and the bonus is being spread out over 5 years, a situation which MLB is apparently more lenient about when it comes to bonuses. The other guys from the first 5 rounds remain unsigned.
And one suspects the ongoing investigation implicating the Nats might have something to do with this sudden shift in philosophy. People ask, "Who cares if MLB gets angry with a team for going above slot? What can Bud Selig do, other than not give that team an All Star Game?"
But this is an area where Selig has a great deal of leeway in deciding whether, and how, to punish a team. And this is a time when the organization may feel it needs Selig's goodwill to avoid harsher punishments for its malfeasance in its Latin America signings, and thus is refusing to go above slot.
1 recs |
14 comments
Comments
Ugh
If Selig uses this scandal to blackmail the Nats into not going above slot, then all he’s going to end up with is a third failed franchise in Washington. I don’t get the slotting system at all; it isn’t there to keep teams like the Nats from competing. If poor teams can’t pay above slot, then they won’t pick guys who want above slot money. Then the Red Sox and Yankees will take them, because they know Selig won’t punish them.
Either there should be no slots at all, or draft bonuses should be pre-set by the league and that is that. This “wrath of Selig” nonsense needs to stop.
As for the international stuff – I’ll believe it when I see NY and Boston (and Oakland for that matter) get punished. Where is the enforcement?
by JBImaknee on Aug 4, 2008 11:10 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Latin scandal
JD was asked about that last night (in the context of the Inoa signing) and said the Rangers had zero tolerance for bonus skimming. He talked around it a bit, but I got the strong impression that the team thinks the A’s played dirty on the Inoa signing.
"I dont care to debate with a troll." - Sharky
by RCCook on Aug 4, 2008 11:14 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
I don't get the Nationals.
Reading that story, it sounds like the directive to adhere completely to the slot system came after the draft.
That’s some serious incompetence.
by LiamP on Aug 4, 2008 11:30 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs
LA signings
Does anyone know of a website where hey keep trackof LA signings and how they have panned out?
"An effortless 98" - Scott Gardner after Neftali Feliz's first AA pitch
by RangerMad on Aug 5, 2008 12:08 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Curiosity question
Suppose Selig (and legal staff) decide to levy sanctions or penalties. What do you think the baseline wrist slap might be, and the yardstick for stiffer penalties?
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912)
by Ed Coffin on Aug 5, 2008 2:39 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
MLB's dogmatism on the slotting system
is utterly ridiculous to me. if it wasnt collectively bargained then teams should feel free to do whatever the fuck they want. maybe it will tip the competitive balance towards high revenue teams but the system isnt perfect to begin with. i just find it absurd to have some set of guidelines that are not absolute requirements, but you strongly encourage teams to follow them. And you might punish them for breaking them but without giving an objective standard for how frequent or how severe of an infraction justifies a penalty. Frankly I wouldnt mind a strictly enforced slotting system, provided it erred on the player-friendly side. But I dont think the union would ever accept that.
by Smoakin in the Boys Room on Aug 5, 2008 2:59 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
The next one
So how does this affect miles and Mr Santos’ dealings with Juan Dominguez?
by bushe on Aug 5, 2008 9:46 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Is there anything more unAmerican
than a slotting system? Especially for a league that does not have a salary cap. Geez! How stupid.
"We live, we die, and the wheels on the bus go round and round." - Tony Romo
by kentbenfer on Aug 5, 2008 10:17 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Huh?
“[i]But this is an area where Selig has a great deal of leeway in deciding whether, and how, to punish a team. And this is a time when the organization may feel it needs Selig’s goodwill to avoid harsher punishments for its malfeasance in its Latin America signings, and thus is refusing to go above slot.[/i]”
What you stated may be 100% true. If so, that is a real problem in my opinion. Then Selig’s office becomes part of the problem instead of finding solutions to problems. It becomes a very “political” situation.
Who/whom sucks up the best is the winner. The losers are the kids that got drafted. Because someone got caught with their hand in the cookie jar(taking money under the table, getting kickbacks, paying bribes, and etc.) the commissioners’ office decides that a college junior has to take it in the shorts. He(his agent and/or family) may have cut a deal with a scout that he would sign for so many dollars. Now he is being told that that deal is out the window.
Welcome to the big business of MLB. A deal is not a deal until the money is in the bank.
It appears to me that Selig is not up to the job. He is not cleaning up a problem nor is he punishing the wrong doers.
Someone in the DR was taking advantage on a young kid. Another young kid in the US was taken advantage of as a result.
WOW, correcting a wrong with another wrong.
Enough!
by Trosey on Aug 5, 2008 10:29 AM CDT reply actions 0 recs
Nationals
sounds like their rebuilding plan needs rebuilding. An organization that has very little talent should not be taking a ‘hardline’ with their draft choices.
Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted.
by t ball on Aug 5, 2008 1:03 PM CDT reply actions 0 recs

by 















