Dr. John Bagonzi Q&A Part 2
In Part II of Baseball Time in Arlington’s three-part Q&A series with Coach Bagonzi, the venerable pitching expert weighs in on the ever-controversial Dr. Mike Marshall, velocity and the Magnus Effect, and the importance of training the lower body for pitchers of all ages, as well as several other topics of great interest.
Coach Bagonzi on "doctoring" a fastball:
"All the time spent on “doctoring” the fastball is well worth it, because movement is priceless and important to pitching success. Having three or four types of fastballs surely fortifies one’s pitching kit - a riser, a tailer, a sinker and perhaps a cutter makes four pitches all coming out of the same delivery slot. Spin direction and amount of spin would be something all pitchers would do well to completely understand and master, for this is responsible for critical fastball movement."
Curious to hear your thoughts.
19 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thanks for this series JP
lots of interesting q/a from you and some LSB folk.
Can someone give me a quick and dirty explanation of how to understand these movement measurements: 1 to 7, 2 – 8, 11-5, 12 -6. I know the later two indicate good curveball movement/drop but what do the #s indicate, the trajectory/drop in inches of the ball, top/bottom?
and is there a measure like these
for sink, left to right/right to left movement other than calling it “armside sink” or “armside run”?
Look at a clock
The numbers correspond to the time on a clock. So a 12-6 curve breaks basically straight down. An 11-5 is thrown by a lefty and has a more traditional down and away break. 2-8 would be a slider thrown by a righty. And a 1-7 is the same as a 11-5 only thrown by a righty.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
Do you know if it is actually a measure of some kind
or somewhat subjective/relative to some degree? And what would the measurement be for a below average curve ball/ slider?
I don't know
I imagine the tag “below average, average, etc” has more to do with the sharpness of the break not the direction of it. For instance Padillas slow curve is an 11-5 pitch but its not sharp. Its a fluke pitch that catches hitters off guard. If he featured that pitch hitters would pound it because it doesn’t have a sharp break. Whereas another pitcher may thrown a tight curve that breaks the same direction, 11-5, but does so much sharper. Basically it looks like a fastball for probably 3/4 of the way to home plate but then curves at the last second. Thats where you will sometimes hear “drops off the table” or something to that effect from announcers.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
Interesting point about defense
and pertinent to much of the talk here lately and the Rangers’ current situation:
Defense seems to thrive and improve when quality pitchers are on the mound.
Let’s hope both defense and pitching show great improvement in 2009.
In essentials, unity. In non-essentials, liberty. In all things, love.
Sigh,
nothing about scap loading.
What kind of pitching expert is he, anyway. Might as well just have them throwin footballs.
"Oh well, McCain is pretty communist anyway,... we can be 70% communist with McCain,"-Sharky
by DJCahill on Sep 25, 2008 1:54 PM CDT reply actions 1 recs
I have a feeling.
I think there will be a part 3.
It's filed under 'D'... for donut.
by NoNameOnCard on Sep 25, 2008 9:27 PM CDT up reply actions
I just thought of a great question!
is it too late to Colbert him with this one:
Dick Mills: great pitching coach or greatest pitching coach?
It's filed under 'D'... for donut.
by NoNameOnCard on Sep 25, 2008 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Doesn't Feldman have 2 fastballs that look identical when coming out of his hand?
Can he learn two more this offseason?
Go Rangers!
Trip answers his own question
Constantly training your legs doesn’t help you use your legs. Pitching is a skill activity. To get better at pitching, you must pitch. No amount of running, squats, yoga, or kickboxing are going to make you a better pitcher.
By that definition...
simply by pitching, a guy will use his legs better. Question: do you actually believe what you just said?
It's filed under 'D'... for donut.
by NoNameOnCard on Sep 25, 2008 9:26 PM CDT up reply actions
it's all about the mechanics
you can work out your legs 7 days a week, but it won’t translate to the mound.
Ok, then...
You’ve got two pitchers. One is 25 years old, 6’ 4", right-handed, and he works out every day to condition his body to make him a better pitcher. The other is his genetic twin, but he doesn’t work out or train; he never has and he never will.
They always throw together and they have the same pitching coach/instructor and identical mechanics. The play for the same reasons, have the same mentality and approach to the game.
Basically, they are identical in every possible way except that one of them works out and one of them doesn’t. You want rational people to believe that the guy who works out won’t throw harder, with a higher pitch-count threshold, and with better recovery times (which translates into more healthy reps on the hill) than his twin?
It's filed under 'D'... for donut.
by NoNameOnCard on Sep 27, 2008 7:19 PM CDT up reply actions
Also...
The question clearly isn’t about being a better pitcher. It appears to be about a disconnect between training methods and teaching methods.
It's filed under 'D'... for donut.
by NoNameOnCard on Sep 25, 2008 9:50 PM CDT up reply actions




















