Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Found Shot to Death


OT: Oil Prices

60 minutes had a good piece tonight on one theory regarding the price of oil.  In summary, it started with the deregulation of trading futures by congress in the late 90s/early 2000s. 

"And in 2000, Congress effectively deregulated the futures market, granting exemptions for complicated derivative investments called oil swaps, as well as electronic trading on private exchanges."

The reason for the drop in prices last year:

"The oil bubble began to deflate early last fall when Congress threatened new regulations and federal agencies announced they were beginning major investigations. It finally popped with the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers and the near collapse of AIG, who were both heavily invested in the oil markets. With hedge funds and investment houses facing margin calls, the speculators headed for the exits."

Story:

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/08/60minutes/main4707770.shtml

Video (summary):


http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/i_video/main500251.shtml?id=4708028n

Something to discuss since nothing else is going on.  AJM, please delete if too off topic.

1 recs | Comment 33 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

While speculators have a part in it

our historically crappy economy certainly lead to the significant drop in prices as well.

"And the Rangers looking to win it! The Rangers have won it!"
-- Josh Lewin, Sept 23, 2004

by Agreen07 on Jan 11, 2009 8:20 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

When oil was $150

It was pretty clear that derivatives, options and futures were propping it up. The crappy economy just popped the bubble.

Get off my lawn.

by DJCahill on Jan 11, 2009 8:29 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I need a little education on how speculation via derivatives, options and futures drives up the price of oil.

Is it something like the supply of oil is spoken for, so if demand increases (or the supply chain is temporarily disrupted) it has a bigger effect since parts of the supply are off-limits due to futures and maybe derivative contracts. Is that the sort of thing you mean?

Personally, I thought that the cost of getting to oil had increased and the amount of oil that was coming from the new wells was not nearly as high as it once was. So, old wells dry up; new wells are costlier and don’t fill the gap left by the dried-up old wells.

Right now, no one can afford to buy it; no demand.

The price of coal has gone down quite a bit as well, even though it has been a cool winter relative to the last few years.

Go Rangers!

by rooster on Jan 11, 2009 10:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The price of just about.....

every commoditity has crapped the bed. Specs?

by bdavison94 on Jan 11, 2009 10:41 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Cost of production, and cost of manufacture

normally doesn’t have a whole lot to do with the price of anything. Much like the cost of players rarely has anything to do with the price of a ticket to the ballgame. Price not equaling cost is one of the first rules of business.

Price is normally set by supply and demand. Folks who purchase derivatives are indicating demand. All of those contracts, options, and exotic derivatives can potentially indicate real demand.

Get off my lawn.

by DJCahill on Jan 12, 2009 4:42 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I'm sure Ben aka our resident Suzy Orman

has something to say about this…

"And the Rangers looking to win it! The Rangers have won it!"
-- Josh Lewin, Sept 23, 2004

by Agreen07 on Jan 11, 2009 8:22 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Heh...

freaking Suze Orman.

Anything that trades is subject to speculation. I don’t think attempting to regulate speculation out of the market is the right idea. Bubbles happen, bubbles pop.

I wouldn’t mind a couple of more price spikes as a motivator for innovation in the energy market (though not necessarily for environmental reasons, more because I’d prefer for the Middle East to never be a strategically significant region ever again).

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Jan 11, 2009 8:56 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah you are right about the innovation...

clearly the urgency of alternative energy sources (regardless of the motivation (Middle East or environment) becomes lessened when oil becomes cheaper. Perhaps this was most recently manifested in the 08 election when drilling became a less significant topic as prices fell.

"And the Rangers looking to win it! The Rangers have won it!"
-- Josh Lewin, Sept 23, 2004

by Agreen07 on Jan 11, 2009 9:03 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

As P.J. O'Rourke says...

we’re way out of whale oil. I think we’ll see some changes in how we live and use energy (telecommuting, non-steady state renewables for some energy needs), but it’s an evolving process.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Jan 11, 2009 9:37 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I wouldn’t mind a couple of more price spikes as a motivator for innovation in the energy market (though not necessarily for environmental reasons, more because I’d prefer for the Middle East to never be a strategically significant region ever again).

I worry about the international relation implications of that. Not just in a bolder Middle East (though temporary), but in a bolder Russia. Russia’s economy has risen and fallen with the price of oil just as much as the Middle East’s has.

by Andy Seiler on Jan 11, 2009 9:04 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Russia is a basket case.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Jan 11, 2009 9:38 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree

completely in regards to ths price spikes. Do you ever read any of Ed Wallace’s work?

by Michael Cave on Jan 11, 2009 9:15 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

No.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Jan 11, 2009 9:28 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You should

a lot the ppl that I work with enjoy his stuff.

by Michael Cave on Jan 11, 2009 9:44 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

You can't regulate speculation in a global marketplace

If oil derivatives and futures are not permitted in the US, then companies will go oversees to hedge their investments / industries.

Also, no one mentions that companies like Southwest Airlines did well during the oil peak since they actually remembered basic finance and used oil futures to lock-in the cost of fuel. So people want to take that away because of “speculators?” Just because people don’t understand it doesn’t mean that it is evil.

by JBImaknee on Jan 12, 2009 12:30 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I agree.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Jan 12, 2009 12:31 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

but when in doubt

blame speculators. same as it ever was.

Mass X Acceleration = Force

by SteveP on Jan 12, 2009 12:58 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or Jews.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Jan 12, 2009 2:57 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or...

Speculating Jews.

"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."

by benmor78 on Jan 12, 2009 3:34 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I blame those damn prospectors

By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw

by Gdawg on Jan 12, 2009 11:49 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

awesome

mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.

by Jayslick on Jan 13, 2009 2:50 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I always enjoy

when “Risk Management” groups kick their own companies in the nuts when their deals fall apart.

Get off my lawn.

by DJCahill on Jan 11, 2009 8:31 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So..

Is it supposed to slowly creep back up then spike this summer or what?

"Obama is a Christian - He's always been a Christian...But.........what if he is[a Muslim]? Is there something wrong with being a Muslim in this country? The answer is no, that's not America." Colin Powell on Obama/Muslim assertions.

by AirJordan on Jan 11, 2009 8:42 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

thats ok

when it spikes they will blame bush ;)

Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.

by knockoutking on Jan 11, 2009 9:21 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

There was a bubble,

it popped, but it seems obvious that over the long term the price is going to go up a lot as oil gets harder to find and harder to get out of the ground/ocean/wherever.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Jan 11, 2009 9:26 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Doubt it.

The bubble was built on top of something structural and long term. Just because there was a bubble doesn’t mean there aren’t plenty of reasons for oil to go up. When the world economies start crawling out of the current mess, oil will skyrocket again as demand recovers.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Jan 13, 2009 12:14 AM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"AJM, please delete if too off topic."

Oh my gosh people, LSB isn’t a dictatorship – it’s a blog for a reason – to share your opinion. I think all of this stuff about protocol and following directions is dumb. Post what you wanna post.

by aggierangerfan00 on Jan 11, 2009 9:26 PM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don't worry

there really is no protocol. Some people just think there might be so they follow a non-existent one that they thing is appropriate.

"And the Rangers looking to win it! The Rangers have won it!"
-- Josh Lewin, Sept 23, 2004

by Agreen07 on Jan 11, 2009 9:32 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah

It’s probably because some people are jerks on here when it comes to posting stuff. You’re right, someone new usually comes on here and gets bashed on their first post.

by aggierangerfan00 on Jan 11, 2009 9:33 PM CST to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well

My employer was implicated.

by Michael Cave on Jan 12, 2009 9:41 AM CST reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

477845_small
July 1st, 2009: A Texas Rangers Memory
Wmplayer_2009-05-18_23-29-11-64_small
David Brown/Spurdynasty on Fastball Velocity and Pitching Performance
Martin_perez__8_small
July 2 Thread
Small
Julio Borbon called up
Small
Going Bill James on Josey’s Great Game

Recent FanPosts

Small
Int'l signings
Small
Giants fan from McCovey Chronicles will campaign for Kinsler
Small
Minors - 7/5
Small
Help with video feed.
Small
Minors 7/4
340x_small
Baserunning: Why have we lost runs due to this?
Small
What moves need to be made.............
Small
Ranger's Snag Sardinas
Small
Frank Francisco's Entrance Song
Martin_perez__8_small
Minors 7/3

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports