Young at 2nd base
by chase1971 on Jan 14, 2009 4:05 PM CST
Email
PrintDoes anyone have the numbers back when he was at 2nd base? I just want to know what his defensive abilities were when he was playing 2nd base. I realize his lack of range will still be an issue over there but how much of an issue will it be? Could he be average defensively there or slightly above average? What was the general consensus about his defense at 2nd?
I need five more words
24 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
-12 UZR, FWIW
He’s not moving back to second base, apparently, so it’s largely irrelevant anyway.
by Joey Matschulat on Jan 14, 2009 4:15 PM CST up reply actions
well
he said he would move for other teams.
and i’m not sure i would be so quick to dismiss it as a possibility.
What if Kinsler makes a statement, a la MY in 2004, saying that he’ll move to LF so that Young can move to 2B and Young said he’d be fine with that. That would force the Rangers hand a slight bit, such that they might consider it if they though Young would be above average there.
He’s not moving, but I think his suckiness is kind of relevant to why he’s not moving
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of the ignorant."
I don't understand moving MY to 2B at all
With the large amount of 2B prospects in the system and the complete dearth of 3B ones, it just doesn’t make any sense. Unless, of course, Duran/Vallejo can be adequate 3rd basemen.
x
and i’m not sure i would be so quick to dismiss it as a possibility.
What if Kinsler makes a statement, a la MY in 2004, saying that he’ll move to LF so that Young can move to 2B and Young said he’d be fine with that. That would force the Rangers hand a slight bit, such that they might consider it if they though Young would be above average there.
They don’t want him at 2B, and they don’t want Kinsler in LF.
by Adam J. Morris on Jan 14, 2009 4:23 PM CST up reply actions 2 recs
but they don't want him at 2B because he'd be bad there
If Young was a really good 2B, I think they’d have to think about moving Kinsler to LF
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of the ignorant."
I thought he was a pretty good 2B
Very quick on the double play ball. But he’s aged since then so it’s not something I’d consider.
by Black Francis on Jan 14, 2009 4:40 PM CST up reply actions
IIRC Kinsler has a whole point on MY in whatever the range rating is for MY's best year at 2b.
i remember young being a good 2b, but it seems Kinsler gets to a bunch more balls than MY did. at least when i investigated last season.
mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.
Young had Tex to his left
and Arod to his right ….I thought he was a damn good 2nd baseman but I wonder if those two provided cover.
I have nothing to say
Doesn't matter, it was a long time ago
and MY can’t cover as much ground as he used to, even if he was still limited
Wait 'til the year after next
Thanks
I went looking for different stuff I could find on his last year at 2nd and Dewan actually wrote a blurb about it
“Before switching over to shortstop, Young had a reputation as an excellent defensive second basemen. However, his 2003 plus/minus figure of -16 suggests otherwise. We reviewed videotape of many of his plays that year to try to figure out the discrepancy, because his basic tools are superb. The problem became apparent very quickly. He simply was playing too close to second base and missed hit after hit to his left. His plus/minus figure was -22 to his left that year and +10 to his right. Now, after having moved to shortstop in 2004, he continues to have problems to his left with a cumulative -46 over the last two seasons. He has a very strong arm and it seems pretty likely at this point that he shades too far to his right to try and take advantage of that arm. In 2005 the average Major League team allowed 292 hits up the middle or in the shortstop hole. The Rangers allowed 374. That was the most in baseball. So, in only two years of work as a shortstop, Young claims last place in three-year plus/minus, three-year zone ratings, team hits allowed near the shortstop position in 2005, and he’s second to last in Bill James’ new relative range plus/minus. Not good.”
http://actasports.com/sow.php?id=190
He was below average in his probabilistic range
http://www.baseballmusings.com/archives/005754.php
And Joey concluded that his UZR was at -12 so it seems pretty clear to me that Young was not a good defensive 2nd basemen.
by chase1971 on Jan 14, 2009 4:57 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
I gather
that MY should plant his ass in the hole at 3B?
That way, they can teach him a one-step dive to his right, with Andrus vacuuming anything unreachable to his left.
Give me Sheets or give me Offseason Blues Part III.
by inactive lsb user on Jan 15, 2009 10:44 AM CST up reply actions
Enough of the MY...
to 2B people. His biggest problem is his range and 2B is STILL a middle infield position. He would be no better at 2B than he is at SS. Plus you don’t utilize his strongest asset which is a good arm.
No to 2B.
"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates
I agree with the limited range
However, fielding a ball to one’s left at SS vs 2B is entirely different.
When fielding a ball to one’s left from SS, the angle that one must take to the ball is virtually parallel with the first baseline, thus limiting the time one has to get to the ball.
When fielding a ball to one’s left from 2B, the angle that one can take is not as limited. On a hard hit ball, the fielder can angle back into the outfield, giving him more time and still have a short throw. On a slower hit ball, the fielder can take the more preferred parallel with the third base line approach. It seems his +/- discussed above may support this theory. However, one could also invoke the “diminished skills with age” clause.
While hard to prove or explain, it seems the angle at which the ball comes off the bat going up the middle of the infield is vastly different than when hit in the hole between first and second.
It seems MY’s range problem is more a function of him not seeing the ball off the bat. It seems that his first move is not until the ball has struck the ground. I’ve heard it said (don’t have the link) that Scott Rolen has tremendous range and reflexes at 3B because he picks up the ball off the bat, not off the ground.
Just though I’d bring that up. But I say no to 2B for him also.
An interesting read...
About a year ago, some statisticians at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania released a study of the performances of major league fielders from 2002 through 2005. They broke it down position-by-position. Assuming I’m remembering correctly, Michael Young played second base for the Texas Rangers in 2002 and 2003, and then shortstop in 2004 and 2005. In their study, Michael Young the second baseman saved the Rangers 1.78 runs per season, whereas Michael Young the shortstop cost the Rangers 13.29 runs per season.
You can see the study conducted by Shane T. Jensen, Kenny Shirley, and Abraham Wyner by going to SAFE: Spatial Aggregate Fielding Evaluation. The position breakdowns and rankings can be found by scrolling to the bottom of the homepage.
"Alright class. Now that I've explained how silly the theory of evloution is, and how it's impossible for a specie to change over time, let's refocus on the Bible. I'd like to direct your attention to Genesis. Okay, now here's how the snake lost his voice..."
forward that to MY
mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.
young.mike@texasrangers.com
mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.
It probably won't work...
When they showed the findings to Derek Jeter, who apparently cost the Yankees 13.81 runs per season as a shortstop during 2002-2005, he assumed that there must have been a computer glitch.
"Alright class. Now that I've explained how silly the theory of evloution is, and how it's impossible for a specie to change over time, let's refocus on the Bible. I'd like to direct your attention to Genesis. Okay, now here's how the snake lost his voice..."
by YourNameHere on Jan 14, 2009 6:45 PM CST up reply actions
I remember that
“What me? A poor fielding SS? The computer’s wrong. I dive into stands. I make jump throws. I’m awesome”
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
he was still 20th
although, i can’t tell right away from the list who is a regular and who isn’t.
and, michael young’s argument about his SS numbers would be that he’s gotten better – which he has
"To be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of the ignorant."
I would rather trade Michael Young...
…than play him at second base.
Frankly, if there was one player I could add as a final piece for 2009 it would be Adrian Beltre at 3B. I don’t believe the division trade hurdle would be a big deal, especially if we could sign Beltre to an extension. After all he turns 30 this year… still in his prime!
We have the pitchers coming in the next two years, but no 3B even close. So lets give the kids the chance before Sheets or anybody else!
Go Cubbies and Go Rangers!
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
