Tuesday morning things
Again, not much news. Just Jon Daniels saying that the Rangers will look to Nelson Cruz to replace Milton Bradley, who has signed with the Cubs.
Jeff Wilson says that Cruz and a healthy Hank Blalock can help replace Bradley's production. We shall see.
And Sean McAdam says Boston is still playing chicken with Arizona and Texas over catching help.
0 recs |
221 comments
Comments
Heh
Boston likes playing with itself?
Gerald Laird: One Man, 5 Scoops.
by Maximilian on Jan 6, 2009 8:34 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa----
zinnnnnnnnggggggggggg
by Michael Cave on Jan 6, 2009 8:35 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A healthy Hank Blalock.
A talented Britney Spears.
A slim Rosie O’Donnell
An impartial Rush Limbaugh
Get off my lawn.
by DJCahill on Jan 6, 2009 8:38 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Funny
you could switch the adjectives on the last two and it’d still be accurate.
To be fair to Hank, he actually does try to be healthy. Rush doesn’t try to be impartial, and Rosie doesn’t try to be slim. I suppose Brittney tries to be talented, but it really is hard to tell.
by JBImaknee on Jan 6, 2009 8:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I got to hand it to you
Continuing to sift through the Boston papers is some yeoman blogging. The way I’ve flip flopped on possible trades with Boston makes me feel like I have ADD.
But this is gratifying:
With each passing day, it seems more and more likely that Jason Varitek [stats] has played his last game in a Red Sox unifiorm.
Haven’t read a single rumor about interest in Jason Varitek, but sure…
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 8:54 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
bleh
cruz/blalock will not put up an OPS in the high .900s
but i think our offense will be fine, as always its the pitching we need to be concerned with.
by Smoakin in the Boys Room on Jan 6, 2009 9:16 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
If Blalock is healthy and gets 500 abs
I think he’s going to hit 25-30 HR with an .850-900 OPS.
This is also a contract year for Hank.
Can we learn from history (Soriano) or are we still worried about making the owner another obscene profit?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 10:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why play Hank?
He’s blocking a youngster, right? Shit, the contradictions are making my brain boil.
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on Jan 6, 2009 10:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
also
josey will claim that if he has a good year it was evidence of a “contract year” rather than simply being healthy…
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:16 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I play Hank this year because, crazy me,
I think he has the potential to be somebody you make a part of your core going forward. Ranger fans have been dumbed down by ownership but it’s not mandatory that you lose your best players to free agency.
From 2009 – 2012, Hank is still going to be in his prime so as long as he’s healthy, his numbers should be fairly predictable.
Love the enthusiasm, benmor!!
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
hank only has a future as a 1b/dh
for another team. I’ll take smoak and davis thanks.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:26 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, Smoak isn't here yet
and a lot of things happen on the way to The Show. Has anybody asked CDavis if he wants to be a DH?
I’ve read various reports on Hank and his ability to return to 3B but let’s say he has Bagwell Disease in his shoulder and is primarily a DH the rest of his career.
What if Blalock puts up 30 HR with a .900 OPS this year as a DH? He’s young, in his prime and a known entitiy. Once again, Smoak is not a known entity and may be a helluva trade piece as well.
If Smoak really can play in The Show, well then you may have to investigate what you could get for CDavis because his agent is Boras and Hicks sure as hell is not going to sign him long-term when free agency comes up.
Do you just kick Blalock to the curb because of his past and because you have another kid coming up or do you offer him 3 years / $ 36 million (an offer a little bit better than Bradley’s)?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 10:38 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
so what youre saying is
from 2009-2012 his numbers will be unpredictable
by Smoakin in the Boys Room on Jan 6, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Blalock is healthy from 2009-2012,
I think his numbers are much easier to predict than predicting what a pitcher or an unknown entity (minor league prospect) is going to do.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 10:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
except of course
that the 2 main know quantities about blalock are at present: 1. Steep decline in production compared to his first couple years 2. serious and chronic injury problems. Neither trend supports your prediction.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
In Blalock's last 506 plate appearances (covering '07 & '08)
he has 22 HR & 71 RBI with an OPS of around .875.
Give him 650 plate appearances when he’s healthy and it’s not unreasonable to believe he would get 30 HR & 100+ RBI. Everybody on board?
Per Hank’s injuries that effected him from the second half of 2005 – early 2007 :
The rib/shoulder problem was solved in a way that he can now hit.
Last year’s injuries – Were they flukey injuries or a sign that his body is breaking down because of past supplemental help? Dunno.
Keep in mind that Blalock just turned 28 years old six weeks ago (he’s younger than Nelson Cruz) which means at the end of the 2012 season he will be 31 years old.
There is a lot of prime left in this player’s career and it is not mandatory that you get rid of him.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 10:57 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
his health is not a given
his production the last two years has been great but it does us no good if he isnt healthy. hank is confined to a 1b/DH role at this point in time and why give him a 4 year extension when we have cheaper, younger, less injury prone options to fill those voids. You act as if cutting ties with hank, as most presume will happen, is a cheapskate move by Hicks. But name one organization, if they were in the same situation with Davis and Smoak on the way, that would extend or resign Hank beyond 09.
by Smoakin in the Boys Room on Jan 6, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
If Hank is our DH and puts up
30 HR , 110 RBI with a .900 OPS and they let him go, it is yet another cheapskate move by Hicks.
I don’t see what the hurry is in getting Smoak up here even if he can play.
The Rangers are going to lose CDavis when he comes up for free agency after 2014. Book it. His agent is Scott Boras and Tom Hicks has this team on a payroll equal to the KC Royals.
Why do you need to bring up Smoak before 2011?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
because he will be
ready by 2010 maybe? Teixeira spent 1/2 seasons in A+ and AA then started the next year. I’m curious, when Davis was demolishing minor league pitching were you still saying, “That davis kid, I just don’t know about him, he hasn’t proven anything yet…”?
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Mark Teixeira is probably going to the HOF.
Let’s tap the brakes on Smoak until we see a little bit more.
Every report on him is great but his biggest contribution to the team thus far is that he helped put them over the top in Baseball Prospectus’ organizational rankings.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
no one is overestimating him
the evaluations of him are not breathless and no one is suggesting he is a hall of fame player. They are reasonable; your pessimism is not.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Explain to me
How Teixeira is “probably” going to the HOF?
by brettgardner on Jan 6, 2009 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i like blalock's approach at the plate
in his first couple seasons, but since then he thinks he is this amazing power hitter who swings for the fences and strikes out too much. good riddance to blalock. Trade him now!
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Bluebird Banter would like him for B.J. Ryan.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 12:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i'd take bj ryan
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:05 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He has 2 years and $20 million left on his contract.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 12:07 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
i think the Jays would have to eat some contract
and it would be a health issue between both players as well.
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Is Ryan that much of an upgrade over Frankie?
Who DH’s? Max?
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 12:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
we have a need for LHP
reliever. BJ Ryan would also be able to close games, so then we would have our 2 lefties in the BP.
If Blalock was going to DH anyway, and we were going to have a lefty there, I’d be all for signing Dunn. I know it won’t happen, but he is one of the best power hitters in the game and gets on base as much as anyone
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
halladay??
i would do blalock, smoak, feliz, and hurley for him how about that???
by awall22 on Jan 6, 2009 12:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I can't tell if you're trying to be funny or stupid.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 12:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
niether
i cant tell why most everyone likes to be a dick about anything and everything that is not so far fetched… there were talks earlier in the offseason that they were shopping him
by awall22 on Jan 6, 2009 12:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Halladay is worth a team's No. 1 and No. 3 prospects, a young controllable pitcher and a veteran slugger.
Just not ours.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 12:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
not so fast
feliz is young controllable and our no.1 he is good that you then just match up needs…. like they need slugger i.e. blalock…they need infield i.e. arias or vallejo… plus hurley too thats a win win for both organizations… plus they get out from under his huge contract…
by awall22 on Jan 6, 2009 12:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he wasn't saying it wasn't enough
he was saying its too much
the preceding post was a great success.
by DSheppard on Jan 6, 2009 5:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe that it will be a sabermetric savvy
team like Toronto (who really needs offense) that eventually trades for Blalock.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
NothinG,
Realize that I’m the King of I Told You So and that I’m waaaaaay out on a limb with Blalock.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
:)
blalock just gets on my nerves, and so did the rangers when they moved him to first base over crush davis. i don’t play with a young guy like that for a guy who can’t play defense. If blalock can’t throw, he shouldn’t be on the field. Is his arm that far from recovery that he won’t be able to play 3B. I think that is ridiculous.
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Realize that they had to put Blalock
at 1B because Washington’s son Milton Bradley was the DH…when he felt like it, you know he’d take time off when the Rangers were playing LAA in July so he’d be healthy for the AS Game and he made damn sure he was playing in the last two weeks when he was trying to qualify for the batting title.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:11 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
good luck cubbies
random not, i wonder how long Wash will last this year if we start out as poorly as last year.
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
your rosey outlook
makes me think that your pessimism regarding prospects is quite contradictory. His #s in 05 and 06 (his last 2 full seasons when healthy) are the #s you should use as they establish a defensible trend: .264/.315/.421/.735. He has only hit 100 rbis once in 4 healthy seasons. The chance that smoak holland feliz borbon and andrus become all-stars is more likley than Blalock putting up those #s, playing 3b or sticking with the rangers beyond the trade deadline.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:23 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
those #s
being your predicted line
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Regarding Blalock...
What do almost every very good to great player in the history of the major leagues have in common?
Look at this list – All very good, most HOF talent players.
Mays, Mantle, Brett, Morgan, MRamirez, Jeter, Aaron, EMathews, DMurphy, Clemente, Reggie Jax, RYount, Banks, BWilliams, RSanto, Yaz, TWilliams, Dimaggio, RAlomar, Bench, Pudge, ARod, Rose … (I can make this list much longer).
All of these players were in The Show as every day players at the age of 23 and younger and were very, very good.
As a 22 year old Hank Blalock had 29/90 with a .350 OBP. That is very rare for a major league player and it’s also why I believe that CDavis may be the real deal…40-50 HR with an OPS approaching 1000.
I’m not saying Blalock should be compared to Mays, Aaron, EMathews, Brett et al but what I am saying is that his foundation of physical talent is such that it should be respected and not thrown away, especially when he is about to hit his prime.
If healthy, $ 6.2 million for this year should be a bargain.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
you continue to ignore
the stats the matter most: his last 2 full seasons. But that is the Josey wails we know…
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
goyogringo, I hate excuses
but I’m going to play the injury card with Blalock because of what he did as a 22 year old.
For a major leaguer to do that at such a young age is rare so that’s why I’m making an exception with him.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:52 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
ok you can break that card out
except that he wasn’t injured those 2 years…
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What does his RBI total have to do with anything
For a guy that would love the chance to sniff Bill James’ crotch, shouldn’t you know a bit better than to post RBI totals as anything remotely meaningful.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
GDawg, aren't you the dumbass
that said Matt Harrison is a “great” pitcher?
Let’s see, Tom Seaver, Roger Clemens, Greg Maddux, Juan Marichal, Sandy Koufax, Bob Feller, Warren Spahn, Walter Johnson and Matt Harrison.
What’s wrong with this list?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Harrison is a great pitcher
Did I say he’s a HOF pitcher? Did I say he is one of the all-time greats? No, I used a simple postiive toned adjective to describe how I feel Harrison is as a pitcher. Not sure why that makes me a dumbass. A dumbass is someone who says that they led the Teagarden bandwagon before 2008 when everyone was high on him as a catcher.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 12:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gdawg, no you're nothing but a cheerleader for the Rangers
and hardly a beacon of reliable information.
Harrison was 9-3 yes, but that doesn’t begin to tell the story. Hello, run support.
He has a chance to be a decent # 3 pitcher on this team but he’s anything but “great” at this point.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Josey Wales,
we know when you are replying to someone.
by Houston27 on Jan 6, 2009 12:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
So just because he's a rookie who struggled last year
that means that he is a terrible pitcher?
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 1:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think a sophisticated Ranger fan
would take an unbiased look at Harrison’s season and be intrigued with his potential but he wouldn’t call him “great.”
15 starts, 6 Game Scores of 50+ which isn’t bad.
ERA of nearly 6 (5.94) at home, leftys had a .971 OPS against him, 3 of the wins came against a very weak Oakland offense where he received 30 runs in support.
I’m not ready to define Harrison just yet but I have no problems penciling him into next year’s rotation.
He’s a long way from being an average major league starter and nowhere close to being “great.”
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 1:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's fine
You don’t believe he’ll become a great pitcher. I do. I don’t believe I have ever said anything about him having a great season last year like a Cy Young candidate would have.
Now is it necessary for you to be calling me a dumbass, a cheerleader, and apparently a non-beacon of reliable information simply because I believe Harrison will become a great pitcher?
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You actually said Harrison is currently a "great pitcher."
If you don’t want to be called a dumbass don’t accuse me of wanting to sniff the crotch of the great Bill James.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 3:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Can you show me exactly what I said?
If you don’t want to be accused of wanting to sniff some guy’s crotch, then you might need to change the way you talk about him. Referring to him as “the great Bill James” doesn’t really help your cause.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gdawg,
Go thru all of your own posts in here over the last 10 days and see if you described Matt Harrison as “great.”
I’m not going to go find it for you.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 3:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Production isn't a problem when healthy.
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract
by tyd3311 on Jan 6, 2009 10:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
MB
I’m not sure Bradley puts up his 2008 numbers in 2009.
Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!
by DerekSTheRed on Jan 6, 2009 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would think not
Since he will have to play in the field, its hard to see. I know he is a year further from his knee problem, but still, its hard to see this turning out well for the cubbies
by BEW on Jan 6, 2009 10:29 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the cubs are going to regret the bradley signing
midway through their first year when, like some1 else said, that they will be paying him 10M per to get treatment in the whirlpool.
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Lou Piniella / Milton Bradley (both Anger Management HOFs)
mix is going to make for nice entertainment.
Maybe it’s me but I just don’t see Piniella as the obvious dumbass doormat that Washington was last year.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:14 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
then who is going to
massage MB shoulders and feet without Wash around. Poor MB
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:19 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
manny
what if we bring in manny not only for the obvious reasons… but what about the young latin hitters we have wouldnt he be able to help bring them along and show them the ropes… ala david ortiz who was nothing before manny… i think cruz would be the biggest beneficiary…
by awall22 on Jan 6, 2009 9:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Heh.
Don’t be surprised if the Sox go to Fort Myers with Bard and George Kottaras as the projected duo, especially with Kottaras out of options, while waiting for the Diamondbacks or Rangers to lower their demands.
Gonna be a long wait, Theo.
by Athos on Jan 6, 2009 9:45 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Also
…to what? Their #9 prospect or something?
by Brett Perryman on Jan 6, 2009 9:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Today I thought of this.
Tea/Salty + Hurley/Harrison
for
Buchholz + Bowden
Anyway a catcher and Hurley or Harrison seems like enough to get Buchholz on the table.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 9:58 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
the thing is
guys like Hurley and Harrison have a lot more value to the Rangers than they would to Boston. What would Boston do with Harrison? Put him in AAA for use as trade bait later? Make a loogy out of him?
Boston is in a position where acquiring young, back end of the rotation types doesn’t do anything for them, they already have better young pitchers in line for a rotation spot.
"I see their [Angels] rotation as John Lackey and a bunch of decent starters." - AJM
by tricer on Jan 6, 2009 10:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
right
unlike in texas neither would be their #3 starter
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Probably not.
IIRC from looking at their minor league numbers awhile ago (and I’ll have to double check), Bowden has better numbers than these guys in the minors.
So this would essentially be two deals: Salty for Buchholz (which Theo already won’t do) and Bowden for a pitcher the Sox think he’s better than. How would that get Buchholz on the table?
Which is not to say that I get the Sox’s sudden reluctance to deal Bowden (or it’s continued reluctance to deal Masterson, for that matter). I suppose it’s possible that JD is asking for more than is being reported, though.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 10:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sure, and it works even downgrading that second piece.
Tea + Hurley for Buchholz +Pimentel, eg.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 10:22 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Sox are not going to take an minor upgrade in the back of the rotation at the expense of giving up a possible #1. If the Sox want to upgrade the back of their rotation, they’ll just sign Derek Lowe.
Texas would have to offer the chance for a defferred #1; It would probably have to be something along the lines of Salty and one of Feliz/ Main for Buchholz and Pimentel, and even then I’m not sure Theo would bite.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There is no way Texas does that deal
And there is a pretty huge difference right now between Feliz and Main. Feliz is one of the top pitching prospects in baseball, similar to where Buchholz was a couple of years ago. Main could definitely earn high praise like that this year, but he still has to go out and prove that he is that good in more than just fall instructs.
Just curious also, what are people’s thoughts on a Feliz for Buchholz straight up deal.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 11:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
well
you would only do it if you thought that Buchholz was projected by your scouts/evaluators as a true #1. Otherwise, no.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Agree
That decision is made wholly by the scouting staff.
I wouldn’t do it.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 11:47 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't think Boston would do it.
They’ve already seen that Buchholz has the stuff to dominate MLB hitters, and they haven’t seen that from Feliz (also, I think Buchholz’s minor league peripherals are better).
Furthermore, since most young pitchers struggle coming into the league. Buchholz is already on the learning curve. A straight up trade would mean that they probably have to go through the same thing with Feliz again in a couple years.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Boston would take Feliz in a heartbeat
the guy throws a fastball with an 80 rating. That’s as high as it goes.
Buchholz was awful last year and was sent down to the minors because his performance was so poor. Buchholz is good and has the stuff to be good, but Boston has no spot for him.
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t see how his having an 80 FB addresses my comment above.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 3:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of young pitchers struggle
but Buchholz has done more than just struggle in the Majors. A lot of the reports I’ve read have been saying that he has taken steps back in his development last year. And he has proven very little in the Majors outside of one great game. You are looking at a guy in his early 20s who started 2008 as the number 4 prospect in baseball (according to BA) and has had his stock drop from there. Feliz on the other hand is an on the-rise pitcher who just turned 20 this past year, will be in BA’s top 10 most likely, and hasn’t doen a thing to lower his value around the league.
I don’t know if either teams do a straight-up swap and maybe Texas would need to add more to their side if they wanted to do that deal, but if you want one of the Rangers catchers with Feliz, you’re going to get Manny Pina at best.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
But but but but but
He has a no hitter
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Jan 6, 2009 3:58 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Don’t get mixed up, in that I was only responding to your question about a straight up swap. I also don’t think that Texas would put Salty + Feliz on the Table for Buchholz (+). That doesn’t mean that I think the Sox are willing to deal Buchholz for anything less, however. It’s a matter of what my opinion is vs what I think the Red Sox FO would do.
I do think you’re simplifying Buchholz’s performance and talent issues though. To say that he’s proven very little in the majors outside of one great game is wrong. He pitched well for the Sox in all of 2007 (which is a very small sample, granted) and he pitched pretty well for a 23 yr old into the first game in May.
After that he pretty much fell apart. Interestingly he seemed to be having really bad luck with men on base (the difference in his FIP and xFIP attest to this); he would do his job and get weak contact but the ball were almost always between fielders or mishandled by them. (Iit was kind of fascinating, actually. You wouldn’t have thought anyone’s luck could be that comically bad.)
After that his composure got pretty bad and the Sox started tinkering with his mechanics and arm slot, and he looked terrible on the MLB level. However when he was in AAA he went back and just dominated. It looks like it’s not a question of his stuff, it’s a question of maturity and overcoming the first real adversity he’s had to face.
And of course just talking about his ML performance leaves out his performance in the minors, which is better than Feliz’s. The Sox put a lot of weight into the statistical record, so they’re not likely to sell low on a guy with his pedigree.
Unfortunately there aren’t a lot of these kinds of deals that we can look at to figure out a “market rate” for this kind of exchange. The only recent one I can remember is Danks for McCarthy. Was that a straight up deal, or were other prospects involved (I thought Texas added a piece to the trade, but don’t remember for sure).
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 7, 2009 8:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Sox are not going to take an minor upgrade in the back of the rotation at the expense of giving up a possible #1.
You overlooked the inclusion of Tea or Saltalamacchia in the deal.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 11:45 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, that might've been a bit confusing
Look at it:
1. Theo won’t do Buchholz for Salty (if he would, it would be done, and we wouldn’t be talking about it), so Texas is looking to add a piece (theoretically).
2. So Texas adds Hurley/Harrison and gets Pimentel. What I’m saying is that the very marginal upgrade of Pimentel to H/H isn’t enough to make up the difference of Boston’s perceived value of Buchholz over Salty.
That marginal difference can be solved by Boston by just buying a FA like Lowe, who looks to be a lot better than any of Pimentel or H/H.
It just comes down to a potential cost controlled #1 being the most valued of “unproven commodities” in the game (with actual young stars, like Hanley, being “proven commodities” and worth more).
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 12:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Lowe
Sure, Rangers fans are watching his story close to see if he crowds the rotation enough for Theo to deal Buchholz.
But if Lowe signs elsewhere Boston conceivably wants Texas pitching along with a catcher for one of their starter prospects.
And if Theo wants depth at a position besides pitcher, I mean these teams can match up on something.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don’t think the Sox are actually that interested in Lowe. I was just using him as an example of how a team with a high payroll doesn’t gain that much benefit by trying to be cheap at the back of their rotation.
The Sox can’t sign someone better than Buchholz projects to be, so he won’t become expendable if they “fill” their rotation. There are also some rumors that Wakefield might retire, so there’s another rotation spot…
The only way I see the Sox dealing Buchholz is if they can get back an elite hitter (what they were looking for with Hanley). What do want for Salty and Hamilton?
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
A WHOLE BUNCH
LESTER, CLAY B, BOWDEN, MASTERSON, AND ELLSBURY…. AND THEIR TOP OFFENSIVE PROSPECT… PREFERABLY CORNER INFIELDER
by awall22 on Jan 6, 2009 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
See but it’s not about Boston’s rotation or Buchholz’s place in it.
It’s about the fact Boston doesn’t have a ML-caliber starting catcher.
Or it’s not. Theo’s done very little at the position so far, so maybe he feels alright there. Plenty of dissent on that issue.
To get a catcher, you have to give until your trade partner is willing to provide one. It’s that simple.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well or until you decide that what your “partner” wants is more than you’re willing to give up at which point you roll with what you have.
I think that’s where we are now.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
why on earth would boston want to do that?
"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg
by rentz on Jan 6, 2009 10:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It accomplishes Boston’s goal of getting a catcher and reimburses some depth where they’re giving up a player.
Hurley would play better in Fenway.
I’m higher on Hurley than a lot of LSB, though. I do think he’ll prove out as a ML starter.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 10:31 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are there people who
don’t believe he will be a ML starter?
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:33 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There are posters on this blog who think his ML performance in 2008 was terrible.
I know I’d take it for a debut.
Go Strangers.
by hightowersmith on Jan 6, 2009 10:37 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know that we've seen enough of Hurley
to make a comprehensive evaluation of him but I was definitely intrigued.
He worked quickly, threw strikes and seemed to be poised. Unlike fat-ass Millwood, he also seemed to be in good shape.
I would love for him to get 30 starts this year (don’t be dumb and trade him for some package revolving around Salty and others for Greinke) so we have a better handle on what we have.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 10:42 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I"m for Hurley and Harrison
rounding out our rotation. Can’t be worse than last year right?
Besides, McCarthy won’t even pitch but a couple of games, and although Feldman was one of our better pitchers in the latter half of last year, I think he is better suited to long relief and spot starting.
Wait 'til the year after next
by NothinG on Jan 6, 2009 12:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I believe that McCarthy
should be used exclusively as long reliever/ spot starter until we see 1-2 years of clean health from him. There is great value in a pitcher that can do that and with this staff, there is an obvious need.
I doubt it happens because JD’s stubborn and also because of all the success we saw Danks have last year as a starter with the WSox.
Yes, he was a starter in the minors but his success in the majors came when he was a long reliever/spot starter.
McCarthy’s body is rejecting the notion that he can take the hill 30+ times and give his team 175 IPs in The Show.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
What?
How has his success only come as a long relief/spot starter?The guy had a 4.03 ERA with an ERA+ of 111 as a 21 year old pitching on the eventual World Series champions rotation. The only reason he was put into relief in 2006 was because Chicago had a rotation full of veterans and they were trying to repeat as champions. Freddy Garcia, Mark Buerhle, Jon Garland, Jose Contreras, and Javier Vasquez all made at least 30 starts. They had a grand total of 3 starts all seaosn by other pitchers. McCarthy had 2 of those. Its my belief that his stint in the bullpen is what led to his injuries. working out of the bullpen can lead to irregular mechanics which can lead to injuries. For a guy who had always been a starter, and a very highly touted one at that, to switch to the pen for a year at such a young age can put alot of stress on the body that can lead to injuries.
McCarthy is a starter plain and simple. In fact I would say he is our most talented starter on the staff right now. yes he needs to show he can stay healthy for longer than a week at a time but he should get that chance in the rotation not be relegated to the bullpen.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Jan 6, 2009 1:37 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think McCarthy has a lot of talent
but I think his Ichabod Crane body is rejecting the notion that he can be a starter in The Show.
Nice win by UT last night.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 1:43 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Why was his Ichabod Crane body
embracing the notion that he can be a starter in the minors vs. “The Show”
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
His body just
knows when he’s in the minors and when he’s not.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 6, 2009 3:33 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't know why BMac's body is breaking
down but I know that it is.
t ball – have you used “nuance” in a sentence today?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 3:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sign Varitek!
Then Boston will be forced to trade for Salty. Sign every free agent catcher available, corner the market!
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 6, 2009 9:51 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
+1
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:02 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
That's so crazy
it just might work. Unless Arizona makes a trade.
Signature! I don't need no stinking signature!!
by DerekSTheRed on Jan 6, 2009 10:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
… or if Boston just goes into the season with Bard/ Brown/ Kottaras, leaving Texas stuck with another C they’ve signed to a guaranteed ML contract.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 12:17 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Obviously I wasn't serious
but Texas can go into the season in great shape with both Salty and Teagarden. I’m perfectly happy trading one of them 6 months or a year from now.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 6, 2009 1:20 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oh, I know you weren’t serious, I was just pointing out that hording catchers doesn’t increase Texas’s leverage.
Do you think you’ll be able to get more for one of Salty/Tea in 6 months if he hasn’t been catching everyday?
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 3:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Perhaps not
but at least TX gets that much more time to evaluate who they want to keep long term.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 6, 2009 3:34 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Please do. I think his best value is as someone who brings back a supplemental pick and a 2nd round pick.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 10:04 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Yep.
And, unfortunately, that is what is going to keep Tek in a Sox uniform. He’ll eventually be forced to cave to Boston’s offer, whatever it is, because nobody is going to give up a draft pick, and pay Boras’ ridiculous salary demands for a guy that can’t hit.
by Athos on Jan 6, 2009 10:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The Sox don’t have to take him back at all. Frankly, I hope they don’t (I also hope they just stopped talking to Boras all together, but they probably didn’t).
I’m more than happy to go into the season with Bard/ Kottars/ Brown. Actually I like all 3 better than Tek right now…
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 10:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't blame you.
I wouldn’t want him back either. But since it looks like the Sox aren’t going to get a young catcher without trading Buchholz, I’ll bet Tek ends up being their real fallback provision.
by Athos on Jan 6, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
It’s possible. The pitching staff loves him (frankly, that’s all he’s got going for him, IMO). However one of the nice things about our ownership group is that they are not sentimental. The 3 young guys all project to hit about as well as Tek does, so unless he’s coming back at a big discount, I don’t see his intangibles being worth several million $.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 11:08 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OCD SS
Did Varitek/Boras really ask for another 4 year / $ 40 million deal?
That is gall.
I can only imagine how hard Bill James laughed when that was presented to him.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:13 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Well, it’s not like I was in the room, but the initial reports we were getting in the Boston media is that Boras wanted to use Possada’s deal last year as Tek’s base (which would be a raise). The price just keeps falling.
"I'd like to f*ck Sandra Bullock." - Pedro Martinez, explaining his secret ambition to Sports Illustrated for Kids.
by OCD SS on Jan 6, 2009 11:15 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
old article on correlating pitch counts to injury
interesting read. suggests that the 100 pitch limit is lore…
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Something that bothers me
Back in like May/June I squealed about the fact that they needed to take every opportunity to evaluate Cruz last season so that they would have a better idea of what they had and was told (from actual 2nd/3rd hand sources as I recall) that the organization didn’t really believe in Cruz’s bat and was wary of these new results, and that their main interest was in using him as trade bait. Then he gets hurt and is limited to 115 ABs. Now, they were good, but that is enough to go from thinking that he’ll never get it to plugging him into the #4 spot and expecting him to replace Milton Bradley’s performance? I think they handled this worse than the catching situation.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 6, 2009 10:15 AM CST reply actions 1 recs
but they can sure build a farm system
joking. but i agree with you. i still have my doubts that they really go with cruz in that spot. I think one of the big, established bats doesn’t end up getting the multi-year dollars he wants and signs a one year deal in TX to up his value for next year. Perhaps Abreu or Dunn.
by clark on Jan 6, 2009 10:18 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and plays where?
in lieu of blalock and/or cruz, trading one or the other? I can’t imagine that either has much trade value at the moment…
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I have to admit
I was in favor of trading him to interested parties at the deadline as his 08 stats were the same as his 07 stats in the minors. However, I do recall that they wanted to call him up about the time he got injured (so, what, 2-3 weeks earlier?). But yeah, I agree, the divergence between these 2 poles is great (suspicion vs clean-up hitter) and I wonder if this type of thinking is that of a team with no money to spend. On the other hand, even if he has an epic failure, we still have other options including a mid-season appearance by Borbon, moving Ham over to right. The downside is that an epic failure combined with a blalock flameout will spell disaster for the offense.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 10:24 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Cruz
His injury last year came at the worst possible time. he was about to be called up for good when he got hurt. Problem with wanting to call him up in May/June was who does he replace? Definitely not Hamilton. Byrd had just come back from injury and was on fire and we were potentially looking to trade him. And Murphy was playing really well until about the middle of june. Boggs was the perfect 4th OF at the time. There really wasn’t any room. Especially for a guy who if he faltered like he had before would have been lost to waivers.
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Jan 6, 2009 10:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
There was room for goodness sakes. Boggs? Come on. Boggs would have been best served with more AAA time anyway.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 6, 2009 10:53 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Boggs started 23 games in May.
If the Ranger “braintrust” really thought Cruz was better than Boggs at the time, there was a lot of playing time to be had.
Recall that the Rangers broke the gate 7-16 and they probably thought Cruz’s start was a mirage (if not, why the hell did they expose him on waivers at the end of spring training?).
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm right about a lot of things
regarding Ranger baseball, OC.
That’s what pisses people off so much.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You just like to counter popular opinion, which I applaud.
You just need to be smarter at it.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 11:12 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oc, I'd much rather be correct
than worry about being popular.
Most of the people in here are sheep looking for affirmation of their beliefs instead of legitimate information.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:14 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
People who wish to achieve power in this world don't concern themselves with other people's beliefs.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 11:20 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
this
Gerald Laird: One Man, 5 Scoops.
by Maximilian on Jan 6, 2009 11:34 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Really?
I would say that people who wish to achieve power become good at manipulating people’s beliefs.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 6, 2009 1:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You'd be amazed how much power one can garner by keeping their mouth shut.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 1:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
oc, so the people with the most "power"
in here rarely post?
I’ll let other people worry about power…I’m more worried about JD trying to put together a starting rotation that can put up 970 IPs or so.
If you can’t get that many innings from your starters, you probably aren’t going to the playoffs and you’re f’ing up your bully the following year.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 1:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You do seem pretty concerned with power.
You’re constantly comparing yourself to other posters, bragging about your analyses, etc.
by brettgardner on Jan 6, 2009 2:04 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gardner, I tend to go out on big limbs
and take a lot of crap for it. When I’m right, I scoreboard.
When wrong, I face the music.
When inbetween (like I am with Blalock), I walk farther out on the limb.
Power? Are you serious?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 2:08 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I am.
And I think it’s silly too.
by brettgardner on Jan 6, 2009 2:10 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
can you give an example of a time when you were wrong
and faced the music. I’ve read your posts for a number of years and don’t recall ever reading anything like that.
"I see their [Angels] rotation as John Lackey and a bunch of decent starters." - AJM
by tricer on Jan 6, 2009 2:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tricer,
Big one – I said Juan Dominguez was going to be a stud major league pitcher and trading him was a giant mistake. Still remember his great outing v the Yanks in NY ’2004.
Another big one – Said Soriano would hit 45-55 HR in Texas. How the sonofabitch doesn’t do it in Texas but does it in DC still boggles my mind.
I said after 2007 that the Rangers should keep GLaird because I thought he was capable of bumping up his trade value (swing and a big miss).
I said the Rangers should have given Blalock a 3 year / $ 30 million deal before last season. TBD.
I had the Yankees & Indians making the playoffs last year (Indians winning it all).
I thought Laynce Nix was going to be a very good major league player. His dad is a really nice guy.
I thought Kevin Mench was going to have a really good major league career (his so-so obp at age 26 outed him eventually).
Bravo Kenny Lofton makes for an interesting case because I was partially right and partially wrong. Lofton was brought here because Boy Blunder thought a 40 year old CF could play a quality OF, hit lead-off and help the Rangers contend for the division. 40 year old CF’s are nearly non-existent in MLB history for a reason. Lofton tanked the first two months (Rangers were 18-31) but then he played his ass off at a very high level (wanted to be traded?) for 6 weeks and then JD traded him Max. That was the last year Lofton played.
I thought Ramon Nivar had a decent chance in The Show.
I said Ron Mahay had no trade value and he was part of the Tex deal.
I also thought that since the Rangers did not give Washington an extension last summer that there was no way he would be coming back in 2009.
That’s just off the top of my head but glad to know you’ve been following what I write for a long time.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 2:30 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
thx
Good to see that you are willing to face the music. Many times I have agreed with points that you make (including a couple of those above), but the delivery could use some refinement.
Do you still post at Newberg’s, or spend the majority of your time over here now?
"I see their [Angels] rotation as John Lackey and a bunch of decent starters." - AJM
by tricer on Jan 6, 2009 2:39 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No comment, Tricer.
Per my delivery, (cliche alert) it is what it is.
I don’t ever want my writing to have ambiguity.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 2:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You act as if
Being blunt and/or honest means you have to be a dick.
by brettgardner on Jan 6, 2009 2:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I really don't care what anybody
who is still in college thinks about me.
College students rate just above a bump on a toad’s ass in my world.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 2:56 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gigolo.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 3:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
No answer.
Just as I expected.
One of my dad’s friends is just like you, Josey. He had no father and so had to get his male role models from movies like Josey Wales. He’s a real tough-guy, too.
I couldn’t hate either of you. Pity, though, is plentiful.
by brettgardner on Jan 6, 2009 3:09 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
he got banned from Newberg's...
again
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Some good sense shown
by the Newberg board.
Get off my lawn.
by DJCahill on Jan 6, 2009 3:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
imagine that
and yet you guys keep entertaining him here…
Shock value only gets so many responses and eventually becomes redundant. It has gone from being a minor irritant and a source of conversation to just repetitious drivel. Oh well…
by laxtonto on Jan 6, 2009 3:40 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
laxtonto,
considering just how boring the Ranger off-season has been, there’s been some nice discussions on the Great Game.
Sure, some people felt compelled to get in a few shots at me but for the most part, there have been good discussions.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 3:47 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Hold up
What do you think Laird could have fetched us after 2007?
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Jan 6, 2009 2:48 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
About what he fetched this off-season
nothing much.
The best part about Laird not being here is that a younger more talented player will be taking his place.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 2:51 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I highly doubt we could have gotten what we got for Laird last winter
I really doubt we could have gotten a guy as good as Moscosco or a guy with as much upside as melo last winter. Like it or not laird significantly improved his trade value in 2008
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Jan 6, 2009 2:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Let's just see if
Moscosco has any value.
I’m a little skeptical at this point.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 2:59 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
You want a starting rotation that pitches 970 innings?
The Red Sox last year had their starting pitchers post 966.2 innings (11 pitchers used, 8 with at least 7 starts). The Red Sox also had one of the pitching squads in baseball last year. Looking to JD to put together a rotation of 5 guys that average nearly 200 IP each or maybe 6 or 7 guys that can reach that point is setting the bar unnecessarily high.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:41 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Gdawg,
970 IPs by your starters is approximate and not an absolute.
Look at the playoff teams of the last few years…there are a couple of exceptions (Yankees and maybe the 06 Twins as well?) but most playoff teams get 970+ IPs from their starters.
If you ever want to see this thing contend, we better get close to 970 IPs from our starters.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 3:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I just think that you are setting the bar too high
I’m not saying 970 is the absolute limit, but the top pitching staffs in the league are the ones that see their starters average close to 200 IP for each rotation spot. If the Rangers get that, you are looking at the hand’s down best offense in the league with one of the best pitching staffs in the league. At that point, you are talking about one of the best regular season teams in baseball history rather than just a team contending for the playoffs. I just don’t think that is necessary. The Rangers last year averaged about 173 innings per rotation spot and they were lucky to at least get innings from some pitchers despite those guys having terrible outings.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:54 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sheep
I hear Galloway has a pretty good size herd.
by RangersOCD on Jan 6, 2009 1:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think the problem
was that Boggs was on the 40 and had options. Cruz had already been outrighted once, if he had come up and struggled the Rangers options were limited.
Mitch Moreland - Rangers 2009 Minor League Player of the Year
by RangerMad on Jan 6, 2009 11:10 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Good call, Ranger Mad.
I also don’t think JD & Wash were in any position to show more patience with Cruz.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:11 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Also, as another point to this,
Cruz didn’t exactly look lights out in his last 2 Major League stints and had destroyed minor league pitching in the past. So Cruz doing what he had pretty much always done for a month+ or so wasn’t really proving that he deserved another Major League stint.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 11:44 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think they had their doubts about Cruz
based off his inability to translate minor league success to the Majors in the past. Him being able to do that finally like he never even came close to before was a huge boost to their confidence in him.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 11:46 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For 115 late season at-bats?
I’m hopeful about Cruz, but you really think that should put concerns to rest?
by Brett Perryman on Jan 6, 2009 11:48 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
At the very least, Bradley should have been dealt and Cruz should have been given August, yes?
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 11:49 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
He was injured remember
Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.
by bigsteve on Jan 6, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, Wash says that Cruz is
going to hit clean-up.
Nelson Cruz is the great mystery of 2009 to me.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:50 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
nice
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 12:12 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I never thought such innocent-looking faces could scare me.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 12:16 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Padilla's and Millwood's faces look innocent
Padilla looks like he is going to kill someone and Millwood looks like he has some evil mastermind plan about to go into action.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 12:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Millwood is actually a big teddy bear in real life.
by oc on Jan 6, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Are you gay?
ARE. YOU. GAY!!??
by Anonymous New Guy on Jan 6, 2009 1:36 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Get the hell off the air!
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
by Rodney on Jan 6, 2009 1:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
just curious
would you have preferred to sign burrell (or someone like him) and just let cruz compete for AB in Left? It would seem to be the safe bet to do so. My fear is that if Cruz and blalock flameout, this lineup is in trouble. I think if you project Davis as shifting to th middle of the order by midseason if not earlier, that risk is mitigated a bit.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 11:56 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Goyogringo,
This team needs an inexpensive bad-ass COF who hits RH so we have to roll with Cruz.
Besides physical talent, age is the most important criteria needed in projecting how productive a player is going to be.
Occasionally there is going to be a late bloomer like Mora or Ludwick (who stunned Bill James this past year) but most of the time players who are 29 (Cruz turns 29 on July 1) aren’t going to be successful in The Show unless they have a couple of good years under their belt.
I hope like hell I’m wrong about Cruz but he’s going to need to defy most major league history to prove this so.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:02 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I think it puts a lot of concerns to rest
I don’t see how him getting 200 or 250 ABs would make that much of a difference to people. You are still not talking about a full season or anything close to a full season.
What do you think about Murphy for instance? He got 400+ ABs last year but you still have plenty of people doubting he can keep hitting as well as he did last season.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 12:27 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
First of all on Murphy
I don’t think the issue is so much whether he can keep it up, but whether that’s good enough.
But yes, I would feel better about 250-300 ABs than 115. I would feel better about 500 or 1500, but my two options last year were more like 250-300 versus 115, and I thought and still think the former would better benefit this team in 2009. Cruz has the potential to be enough of an impact player (unlike Boggs, for example) in 2009 that it was worth the priority.
by Brett Perryman on Jan 6, 2009 12:32 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Unlike Cruz, when Murphy arrived in Texas as a 25
year old, there were no immediate OBP issues with him. I don’t think Murphy is much better than a 4th OFer on a good team but he definitely has the talent to play and contribute at this level, probably as part of a killer platoon.
Can Cruz really be the clean-up hitter on a team that needs to score close to 1000 runs to finish above .500 from April to October and be productive as a 29 year old when he’s never done it in his past?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 12:44 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Sorry, but I just disagree
I think getting an additional 150 ABs or so would make everyone feel a bit better, but it really wouldn’t make that much of a difference.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 1:13 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
The only way I can explain Cruz's renaissance
would be if he had some kind of massive “lifestyle change” and I don’t think that’s the case.
When you get to The Show at the age of 26 and your OBP is .261, you can’t play in the bigs.
Planning on Cruz being a productive clean-up hitter on a team expected to score as many runs as this team is seems like another great leap of faith.
I hope I’m wrong.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 1:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Didn't Cruz
start baseball relatively late? I thought that explained his delayed development curve somewhat. Anyone remember that or am I crazy?
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
by t ball on Jan 6, 2009 1:29 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Tis true
Was a basketball player.
"My mother always taught me that if the only thing you have to say is,
‘(Expletive) Dave Samson,’ then don’t say anything at all.
So I’m not going to say anything at all.
Is my mother the greatest or what?"
- Mariners GM Bill Bavasi, after signing Ichiro to a $90 million contract
by tyd3311 on Jan 6, 2009 1:46 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
and a boxer
if I remember right.
"I see their [Angels] rotation as John Lackey and a bunch of decent starters." - AJM
by tricer on Jan 6, 2009 3:57 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yep, Ed can chime in here
since he knows the guy’s past as if it was his own, but the short answer is that Cruz only started playing when he was 18.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
by Gdawg on Jan 6, 2009 3:55 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
OMG
Did I really just read this ? Is Chris Davis’s agent really The Great Satan ????
Just when we think we have a nice nucleus for years to come. I know we have him under control for years to come but there is NO chance he stays in Texas when free agency comes SAD SAD SAD.
If Smoak really can play in The Show, well then you may have to investigate what you could get for CDavis because his agent is Boras and Hicks sure as hell is not going to sign him long-term when free agency comes up.
by camsdad on Jan 6, 2009 11:22 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
OK . . .
but the Rangers would have to trade Teagarden and Borbon too.
by Randy Richardson on Jan 6, 2009 11:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I don't get the hate for Scott Boras
Is he a douchebag? Probably. Does he squeeze every penny for his clients? You bet. Is that not his job, and is he not the best at it? I don’t see how you can argue against that.
If I was a high school baseball player, I’d want the best guy representing me, and that’s Boras. Like him or hate him, he’s the best at what he does.
The people complaining about Boras clients on our team are just as annoying as people who bring up A-Rod’s contract as evidence of the Rangers “willingness to spend money”. If we build up a core of affordable young talent, then getting extensions and long term deals (especially with Boras) won’t be as big of a deal for Hicks.
Gerald Laird: One Man, 5 Scoops.
by Maximilian on Jan 6, 2009 11:40 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
For all of those that keep harping on the Danks deal
Here is a report from rotoauthority on common cliques used during ST
John Danks (SP-CWS)
Claim: Working on a Cutter.
Result: Threw a cutter on 16.4% of his pitches, up from 0% in ‘07. His Cutter was used 3rd most out of his 5 pitch repertoire (pretty interesting stuff). It’s also worth noting: he materialized into a major league starting pitcher in ’08: 195 IP with a 3.32 ERA.
So needless to say, the Cutter had a lot to do with it, and he never would have learned that here in Texas.
Lots of interesting and kinda funny stuff in here
by laxtonto on Jan 6, 2009 12:09 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
BS
Adair taught Ballard a cutter last year. It is not like the cutter is the great unknown gyro pitch of 08. Its advantages in evening out splits are obvious and there is no reason to believe Danks would not have picked it up here as well.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 12:15 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Except for the fact that Buhrele taught him the cutter
and until he reach the WS MLB ball club did the idea of teaching Danks a new pitch ever materialize.
by laxtonto on Jan 6, 2009 12:24 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
except for the fact
that the WS didnt’ teach that to him until after he needed it his first year putting up mediocre #s
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 12:28 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
from the same link, lol
Kevin Millwood (SP-TEX)
Claim: Took up Martial Arts
Result: Matched his 2007 season, pitching in 168 innings, with a 5.07 ERA.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 12:45 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Per Norm earlier today,
The Rangers are bringing Cordero in for a workout, either Wed. or Thurs, and are said to be fairly serious about signing him.
I couldn’t find anything to back this up, but Norm does have his sources w/the Rangers, so I’m sure it’s true.
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
by Rodney on Jan 6, 2009 2:17 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Interesting
I’d like to see them get Cordero as well, if only to decrease the possible importance of Turnbow.
Did Jon Daniels downsize your old position at Dunking Donuts?
by lonestarJon on Jan 6, 2009 2:18 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
they are going to spend a lot of money on a reliever
with none left over for sheets.
Mandatory reading before suggesting a trade
by ab03 on Jan 6, 2009 2:23 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Fair assumption, at this point.
However, it is an area of need, and better than doing nothing.
"...my balls are really like a veiny flesh color" blueballlefty on Jun 4, 2008 7:44 PM EDT
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
by Rodney on Jan 6, 2009 2:25 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
sounds right with about half the league interested though
MLBTR:
Chad Cordero To Audition This Week
By Tim Dierkes [January 6 at 8:38am CST]
According to a baseball source, free agent reliever Chad Cordero is ahead of schedule and teams will watch him throw this week. The Nationals had said he wouldn’t be able to throw until June due to last summer’s labrum/biceps surgery.
Teams known to be interested based on reports: the Angels, Mets, Cardinals, D’Backs, Rangers, and Tigers.
by Goyogringo on Jan 6, 2009 2:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Blog Bukkake
I think I’m going to have to ask Newberg to unban Josey and take him back, because every time I see a thread with a bunch of posts in it, I think, “yay, something interesting!”, only to have to spend wiping nonsense out of my eyes and rinsing mutually contradictory insanity out of my mouth.
If I have to read the words “The Show” or “The Great Game” one more fucking time, I’m going to pay a 16 year old to find out where Josey lives so I can go crap in his mouth while he’s sleeping, and then I’ll crap on his toothbrush so that when he’s like “damn, somebody crapped in my mouth, better brush my teeth,” BAM, I shit on that, too.
Jamey Newberg, LSB will trade you Josey Wales for Phil Nevin, and we’ll also eat most of Josey’s contract.
Fuck me.
"I know you're a bit dense but no, it doesn't. Obviously lying isn't a problem for me."
by benmor78 on Jan 6, 2009 4:24 PM CST reply actions 11 recs
So you're the little brother who doesn't have a
a cool baseball website, correct?
I suppose since you are a part of the family everybody needs to pull their punches with you so I’ll follow suit.
Entertaining post for the most part. Great passion and major points for bukkake. Nice creativity early but then you began to fish-tail with the over-the-top vulgarity and then you jumped over the shark by threatening to crap on my toothbrush.
I did like the way you came back to touch the Ranger baseball page with a Phil Nevin reference although I would have opted for Brandon McCarthy instead.
Still, not a bad effort for the little brother.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on Jan 6, 2009 11:50 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
This might be the funniest thing I've ever seen on this blog.
Did Jon Daniels downsize your old position at Dunking Donuts?
by lonestarJon on Jan 6, 2009 5:26 PM CST reply actions 0 recs
Too busy laughing to hit reply
That’s for Ben, of course.
Did Jon Daniels downsize your old position at Dunking Donuts?
by lonestarJon on Jan 6, 2009 5:26 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs

by 





















