Projected line-up by OPS+
The link above is to a Posnanski blog post about the Royals' projected line-up for 2010. It got me curious to see the Rangers' projected lineup by OPS+ for comparison's sake. Based on the 2009 OPS+ at Baseball-reference.com [ballpark adjusted] ...
Borbon - 105
Kinsler - 107
Young - 128
Hammy - 90
Nellie - 117
Lowell - 106
Davis - 85
Salty/Tea - 70/65
Elvis - 82
Murphy - 101
Inglett - 87
Gentry - 2
Atkins - 66
Kevin Richardson - 166
Kevin Richardson's wife - 10
So, surely Borbon's gonna come back down to earth a tad, but you'd hope Kinsler, Hammy, Davis and at least one of the catchers improves their act come 2010. Also, you can kinda see where JD's comin' from wanting Lowell to DH some this coming season. If not him, who?
about 2 years ago
shroomer
4 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
This team
is such a collection of wild cards. The entire front office and coaching staff is going to have ulcers.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
Some thining out of the GDT herd
would not necessarily be a bad thing
I’m a white boy who doesn’t think a black man is good enough to manage my baseball team. - LSJ
"I really think that" - LSJ, on being asked by AirJordan
Hamilton 90? Daaaang.
I failed my LSB ethics test.
"WHAT A SHITLOAD OF FUCK" - LL's "Poochie" on Rich Harden signing with Texas over Seattle
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2012 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
