Ruminations on the Rangers
So, yeah, this series in Detroit sucked. 11 straight loses in Detroit, 0-6 against the Tigers this year, and some wind is out of the sails on the heels of a 7 game losing streak.
At the same time...I don't know that this series says all that much. Yeah, they were all relatively close games that the Rangers could have won, but when you get back-to-back walk-off wins against a solid closer like Brandon Morrow to turn losses into wins, you aren't really in a position to curse the baseball gods for bad luck.
And I know Ron Washington has been getting killed in the comments for a few decisions in today's game, but...I don't know. I can't say I'd necessarily have done what Washington did this afternoon, but I don't see anything that is so glaringly wrong that he needs to be ripped for it.
Leaving Millwood in to face Miguel Cabrera in a tie game with two outs in the 8th? Tough call there. I wasn't watching the game, so it is hard for me to say if Millwood was obviously laboring or struggling. Darren O'Day has been solid against righthanders, so there's a case for bringing him into the game. At the same time, O'Day is a relatively low-K groundball guy who would be put in a situation where a single gives the Tigers the lead. He's not the ideal option there...but then, your ideal option in that situation would be a hard-throwing righty reliever who could come in and challenge Cabrera and try to get a strikeout. And the Rangers don't have that, which makes this, to me, an example of why Jon Daniels and the front office deserves some criticism for putting together a flawed bullpen versus Washington blowing it by not bringing in O'Day.
There was also questioning of why Elvis Andrus or David Murphy didn't steal in the top of the 9th. Andrus, I was surprised didn't run...the Rangers clearly thought they could take advantage of Dane Sardinha behind the plate, and Andrus is a good base-stealer. Murphy, on the other hand, isn't a great base-stealer, and by sending him, you are running the risk of having him thrown out for the second out of the inning, and eliminating the possibility of a fly ball by Michael Young scoring the tying run.
I think as much as anything, the Rangers didn't try to steal in the 9th because they were playing for the win, not the tie. The Rangers have struggled to score runs all series, and with Jason Jennings and Derek Holland unavailable today, Washington basically had a two man bullpen (in terms of guys he is going to trust in a tight situation) to work with. I may be over-analyzing it, but I think that the feeling was that if the Rangers were going to win, they needed to try to win the game in the 9th, not tie it and then limp along into extra innings hoping that they could keep the Tigers bats quiet and eke another run out later.
Finally, there was the decision not to hit Josh Hamilton for Elvis Andrus. A couple of things there...first, Hamilton hasn't played in several days, and I have to think that Washington was reluctant to throw him out there in his first action in several days to face a hard-throwing reliever in a situation where a home run is only going to tie the game anyway. Second, I have to wonder if there aren't some concerns that Hamilton's groin may force him to the d.l., and the team wants the flexibility to back-date Hamilton's d.l. stint to last Sunday. Playing him today would cost them four days. (It was just pointed out to me that Hamilton pinch hit yesterday. So ignore this whole paragraph).
In any case, I've got mixed feelings about this. Despite the fact that the game day threads and post-game threads seemed to indicate a high level of hostility towards Brandon McCarthy's pitching, Taylor Teagarden's defense, and the decision to leave Kevin Millwood in the game, the Rangers run-prevention the past three games was pretty good. They are continuing to get okay pitching and to play great defense.
No, the problem with the Rangers the past three games is that they scored a total of 6 runs in the series. You aren't going to win games scoring 2 runs per game. And with the season almost a quarter over, things that could be dismissed as sample-size fluctations a few weeks ago start becoming more troubling.
You aren't, for example, going to have a very good offense with both your DH and your first baseman posting a sub-.300 OBP. And Chris Davis and Hank Blalock are both well below that mark, with Davis coming into today's game with a .269 OBP and Blalock posting a .271 OBP. And Blalock, of course, is also hitting cleanup, meaning that you've got a guy right smack in the middle of the lineup who is making an out almost 75% of the time.
I've been preaching patience with Davis, and I still think he's going to come around, but he and Blalock are hurting the lineup right now, and...well, I can't believe I'm about to say this, but I have to wonder if we don't need to see more Andruw Jones at the DH spot, particularly at the expense of Blalock. Chris Davis is part of this team's future, and so I'm willing to ride out his struggles if it is going to make him a better player long-term and not impede his development. But Blalock isn't going to be here beyond this year, and if he isn't going to post a .300 OBP, I don't know that he has a track record that suggests that he's going to rebound sufficiently to make him that much better than the other options you have.
Really, looking up and down the lineup, the offense overall hasn't been all that inspiring. Ian Kinsler and Michael Young have carried the offense for the first quarter of the season...otherwise, you've got guys who have been okay in relation to expectations but not overwhelming offensive players (Nelson Cruz and Elvis Andrus, for example), or guys who have been disappointments at the plate (Davis, Blalock, the catchers, and even Josh Hamilton).
The Detroit series, though, I think highlights what is potentially the Achilles heel for this team going forward...its inability to get on base. And along with that, what seems to be an organizational refusal to try to work the count and make pitchers throw a lot of pitches. If you sort A.L. hitters by average number of pitches per plate appearance, the bottom 10 includes Hank Blalock and Marlon Byrd, and the bottom 15 includes Michael Young and Elvis Andrus. That goes a long why towards explaining why the team is near the bottom of the league in OBP.
What is ironic about this is that Ron Washington has preached a philosophy of working the count and making guys throw a lot of pitches. The Rangers were near the top of the league in walks last year, in no small part because of Milton Bradley and his patient approach, something the team is lacking this year. Part of the reason I'm so reluctant to talk about trading Justin Smoak is that, while he doesn't look like a potential 40-50 HR per year guy, he does seem like a Milton Bradley-type offensive player, a patient hitter who is going to hit for average and some power and draw a ton of walks. That's the type of hitter this lineup -- laden with high power, middling to low-OBP guys -- is in dire need of.
On the plus side, you could say that this is actually a good thing...Blalock, Davis, Hamilton, et al are going to eventually get it going, and the fact that the Rangers are in first place despite the offensive issues is an indication that they are good bets to continue to play well as the offense performs better. If you want to look at it as half glass empty, you could say that it isn't realistic for the run prevention to continue at this level, and once the team starts allowing more runs, the offense isn't going to be able to carry it, and the club will come crashing back to earth.
I tend more towards the former point of view...I think this is a team that has been playing well, but not over its head and not at a level where you expect an inevitable regression. I think that this is a team that can be playing meaningful games in September. But at the same time, I think this is a team that has some issues with its offensive identity, and needs to get a handle on what its philosophy with the bats is going to be going forward.
146 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice post.
¡Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!
I came here to split hairs. And you?
by inactive lsb user on May 21, 2009 8:50 PM CDT reply actions
+1
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
Yep, this is why Adam is big, and we are little
I'm Matt mutha-effing Bush, bitches, and mutha-eff East County.
"I'm as passionate and knowlegeable as any fan out there." Josey Wales
by Brian Thomas on May 22, 2009 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions
I agree 100%
No arguments here. Except Hamilton did pinch hit last night or the night before? So it wouldn’t go back to Last Sunday anyways, right?
I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'
Thank you for writing this, AJM
And Blalock, of course, is also hitting cleanup, meaning that you’ve got a guy right smack in the middle of the lineup who is making an out almost 75% of the time.
This needs to be repeated daily until Hank gets his shit together or the AB disparity between him and Andruw normalizes.
Smoak is the Rangers' "philosophy with the bats" going forward.
Wonderboy, what is the secret of your power? Wonderboy, won't you take me far away from the mucky-muck now. -- Tenacious D
For what it's worth
Juan Cruz blew a game for the Royals today.
Very good post, though.
"Was this really necsarry?" - cowpoke/hurler hurley
Jaded Opinion
Sure seems like MY can’t score a runner from third base with less than 2 outs without getting a hit. Maybe his failure in these situations just stick in my mind easier than the successes. It just drives me batty that the 3-hole hitter can’ get these runners home.
Yes, I know, he pulled the bacon out of the fire several times with key late inning home runs. I guess I should be more “forgiving”.
MY
I feel like he feels like the burden of the team and to produce is on his shoulders so he is pushing alittle too much for him to produce….MY of the past seemed to be patient and work the count and recently it seems that he is swinging at alot of early pitches!!!!!
MY and the rest of the team will start to hit….Washington’s philosophy of being at the plate and working the count needs to be enforced more. I think players like Salty, Cruz, Davis, and Hamilton would work the count more then they would be in more hitters counts….drives me crazy to see them swinging at the 1st pitch all the time (sometimes it is ok but not every at bat)..
by ACtheStud1980 on May 21, 2009 9:24 PM CDT up reply actions
Michael Young's average is .504 when swinging at the first pitch.
Just sayin’
She say she are the manager.
by rockin_rangers on May 21, 2009 10:51 PM CDT up reply actions
Actually I recall a study
that swinging at the first pitch was the most productive pitch to swing at. I believe it was in baseball prospectus.
As long as folks are successful doing it, like MY, I don’t have a huge problem with it. Its when guys who definitely need some work on getting on base do it and appear to not be seeing the ball real well, like Hank, Chris, and Josh, that it makes me crazy.
"I'd praised catcher Max Ramirez two weeks ago, but after his continued struggles I'm increasingly convinced he's not going to pan out." - crops.mlblogs.com
Bingo
Also, it needs to be a good pitch
what pisses people off is when you hack at some shitty pitch
The real problem is
When guys do it to the point of getting reps for being first-pitch hackers (like Hamilton and Blalock), stop seeing good first pitches to hit and keep doing it anyway.
I imagine it could very well be the best pitch to hit at times, when pitchers are trying to jump ahead in the count, but you’ve also got to be able to adjust when guys start throwing you first pitch junk.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
Excellent writeup
And perspective. And when (if) things get dicey before the end of the season, this emerging success is the foundation for a lot of hope, but it … is … stilll … a developmental year. If the Rangers win the West, that’s getting off the sidewalk and onto the porch. Yet I’d love to see continuous improvement. And yeah, wiser hitting approach is right up there on the front row.
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 21, 2009 9:03 PM CDT reply actions
Growing Pains
Yes, a developmental year, precisely. The hot start (esp. compared to the last several seasons’ awful ones) has probably skewed the perceptions of many around here. We need to remember how young this team is and how the long-term plan was to develop it from within. There was a whole lot of talk this off-season about how we all expected the Rangers to finish within 3-5 games of .500, but that next year and for several more beyond, they should be contenders. Winning seven in a row and jumping out to first place was a lot of fun, and it exhibits the potential this team has, but dropping three in Detroit just demonstrates that there are still growing pains to endure. And that baseball is a crazy, streaky game of inches.
On a somewhat related note, I have an informal measuring stick I have come up with for judging the relative success of a team over the course of the season. I figure if the club plays .500 on the road (40-41 wins) and .667 at home (54 wins), they win 94-95 games. Most seasons, that’s contending for, at the very least, a wild card spot. Right now, the Rangers are a little ahead of this at home and a little behind on the road. There will be dips and rises in this as the season goes on, but if they get about half the series on the road and take two out of three at home most of the time, they’re doing all right.
The point about both of these issues is, you can’t get too myopic. Yes, it sucks to get swept in Detroit, but every team goes through that from time to time. But in the big picture, the team got out of the gate hot like we all so desperately wanted to see, and after the first quarter of the season, they’re six games over .500 and in first place. That’s a damn sight better than we’ve seen in a long time around here.
re: "...that’s getting off the sidewalk and onto the porch."
I have no idea what that means.
Ed, what does that mean?
I'm Matt mutha-effing Bush, bitches, and mutha-eff East County.
"I'm as passionate and knowlegeable as any fan out there." Josey Wales
by Brian Thomas on May 22, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions
Aphorism for
Being outside the playoffs and then getting into them (no assurance of going further).
Going from the porch to the dining room would be progressing to the WS.
Sorry for the obscure reference.
Sputterfussing is making a lot of noise but not gaining anything from it.
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions
Thanks for the definition
Was in the neighborhood of the meaning from the context in which you used it. Didn’t find anything in the dictionary (including dictionary.com) for it and a Google search provided a lot of links to a fishing lure by that name.
Good read on a night most of us feel jilted
I felt like we won the WS after sweeping the M’s and Angels last weekend. Then comes Voodoo Palace v 2.0, and now I feel like we’re lost in translation. Let’s get back on track and try to stay positive from here on out.
"BIg whoop, wanna fight about it?"
The thing to remember is that if this game today if it was at TBIA we win 6-4 or something like that
that park is where homerun hitters go to die and we had a couple real solid hits that would be out of most parks in the league drop into a glove 5 feet from the wall.
im a big fan of using our great hitting off the bench in key moments, and getting guys like Andruw a bat when we need one late in games. Also, any1 catch the situation where we really needed a speedy Golston or Borbon-like pinch runner to come into the game when murph walked and we dont have that a guy filling that role on the 25 man? We are a good team, we had a bad series at a park that is cursed to us, and its shown our need for a power righty in the pen and a speedy jet bench guy who can fill a PR role in a life or death game. Its good to know these things at this point in the season and the good news is, that by september i think we have those roles filled on this club.
good stuff.
mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.
Mike and Ian need to be back to back in the lineup though
they protect each other back to back and i think that it scares the crap out of pitchers.
mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.
Damn right
I’m not sure RW tinkers with that part of the line up when Hammy is out.
"BIg whoop, wanna fight about it?"
by lost in space on May 21, 2009 9:23 PM CDT up reply actions
Agreed.
On basically everything.
I had the same thoughts about Smoak and why I’d rather hang on to him and trade Davis. The one thing that keeps me from going all in is that Davis has been pretty good defensively at 1st and I’m not sure how good Smoak is. That, and I’m not sure what team matches up really well for what the Rangers need and what they have to offer. It seems like there’s a big difference between what a package like Davis+MaxRam+Main should get you on paper and what you could actually get for them. In my head, that many years of control on cheap solid hitters plus Main should bring back an ‘ace’, but I don’t know what teams have an ace to offer and those spots to fill.
Also, it’s interesting that there does seem to be a good plan in place for the pitching staff (build from within and see what sticks from cheap vets) and for the defense (would love to see Borbon’s bat advance enough so that we could see him patrolling CF), but a plan with more uncertainty in place for the offense. Their stud hitting prospects are blocked right now. It seems that for those, like myself, who desperately want to see the Rangers be more patient, it is going to have to come from a change in mindset of players that are currently here or on their way here soon.
Holland to Start in Houston
and Pad to DL, this will be a game to watch to see how well Holland does, hopefully it will go very well.
When will this Rangers Pitching Nightmare Ever End, Year after year after year, it just goes on and on........
I bet they pull after 90 pitches regardless, anyone think he'll pitch more than 90?
"BIg whoop, wanna fight about it?"
by lost in space on May 21, 2009 9:31 PM CDT up reply actions
I hope not.
The 40 Trumps All!!!
I think movies where it turns out the British guy did it are probably pretty accurate.
by thedirkatron on May 21, 2009 9:38 PM CDT up reply actions
Me too.
Which hopefully will get him to the 5th inning.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
the only situation he goes over 80
is if hes got a no hitter heh.
the preceding post was a great success.
Good post
I’m a glass half full guy plus the run prevention has been helped out by defense. If the pitchers were just doing with smoke and mirrors, I’d say that the run prevention could go up. But we aren’t seeing our pitchers up to this point doing something that they aren’t capable of for the rest of the season, and the defense isn’t all of a sudden going to stop playing well. There might be some slumps there just like with hitting, but overall, these guys are playing like they should be and like they are capable of. This is also with Young still learning on the job.
As for the hitting, its going to come around. Its great that this team has been able to be in 1st place despite the hitting not doing so well. Blalock and Davis aren’t going to maintain this OBP below .300. And a big problem with this offense is their hitting w/RISP (something that is due to start going our way):
Blalock:.200/.255/.444
Young:.111/.200/.111
Hamilton:.174/.214/.348
That’s our 2-4 hitters and even with Blalock and Hamilton disappointing offensively this season, they still should be hitting much better than that.
Also, Blalock needs to hit lower in the lineup. His approach in the past has been much different when he is put in the middle of the lineup vs. lower.in the lineup. If that happens, I think we’ll see a more balanced hitter in Blalock and one that will be a lot more productive.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
I agree
it’s not like the bats can get worse, right? I don’t think we’re going to start leaning on the bullpen more…that’s what scares me.
Anyone else notice how fast Kinsler's
Batting average is dropping? i hope that he does not go into a long slump, runs scoring is low enough as it is to have him not getting on.
Larry Parrish Was Da Man!
The tradeoff is
He’s walking a lot more right now. The BA over the last week is .250, but the OBP is still .438 (and the slugging .583). He’s got 7 BB’s in his last 7 games.
So while he might be in a little slump BA-wise, he’s still hitting for power (of his 6 hits over the last seven games, 2 are doubles and 2 are homers) and he’s still getting on base via the BB. If that’s Ian Kinsler in a slump, I’ll gladly take it.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
he's sucking major ass
on the road, hitting about .170. didnt have that problem last year
go here to view my blog: http://dirtfromd.blogspot.com
by studcrackers on May 22, 2009 3:04 AM CDT up reply actions
Who's
at first base tomorrow, Hank or CD?
by icouldusesomebaseball on May 21, 2009 9:58 PM CDT reply actions
Probably Hank
Given that Ron thinks he’s too hot to take out of the lineup.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
So so so so aggravating how RW coddles certain guys
I still think Rangers Brass is forcing the issue. No manager in their right mind would want a guy batting .225 batting clean up. The HR"s are nice, but right now we need guys on base!
"BIg whoop, wanna fight about it?"
by lost in space on May 21, 2009 10:09 PM CDT up reply actions
I'd be really surprised...
…if the front office is making Washington hit Blalock cleanup.
by Adam J. Morris on May 21, 2009 10:11 PM CDT up reply actions
the only one forcing an issue
is Hank fucking Blalock, because he’s a dumbass. If someone just convinces him that he doesn’t need to hit HRs to get a big contract, he’ll probably stop acting like a retard.
"Hustle doesn't cost a dime and it looks good." - Pete Rose as Channeled by Marcus Lemon
I don't think he's thinking about contract
He’s been a try-and-yank-everything hitter for a long time now. This year his BABIP and BA have sucked so far, which has really exposed his faults.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
Can't find anything to argue with there.
Well maybe a little. I don’t think the run prevention is going to have a massive regression, but I do think some sort of regression is inevitable. On the other hand like you said, the offense could be due for going the other way, and maybe it will more than make up for it. Who knows.
I do know that I’m sick and fucking tired of Blalock and have been for a long time. I told everyone that even at 6 million dollars that was a waste of money and I wasn’t alone. He should be gone right now. Hopefully he’ll go on a hot streak and they can trade his sorry ass, pick up some of his salary, and maybe get some relief help.
I don’t really care if the Rangers walk a lot. Well I’d prefer it if they did but what I really care about is working the count and getting pitches to drive. Some walks would be a natural byproduct of that approach. I did not see today’s game but there were times during this series that it looked like they were trying to do that but the pitching was just too good. Sometimes you just get beaten. What happens in Houston may be more of an indicator.
What happened in DET sucked but I don’t think it’s anything to get too down about. They faced a real good team and played competitively. Shit happens.
dead on AJM
I’ll ask this again. Is it a problem when the manager can’t impose his hitting philosophy upon his ballclub? Seems like this team listened to Bradley last year but is tuning out RW this year.
What is Rudy’s contract status? If this team is in contention is Sept I don’t see how they couldn’t bring back RW. Would they bring back Rudy if things continue like they are now?
Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year
At some point
people here should stop expecting coaches to be miracle workers.
Rudy and Wash can scream into Blalock’s ear until he’s half deaf, but if his dumbass self believes hitting a lot of HRs will give him a big contract, he’ll keep hacking. Aggression is fine, but part of aggression implies getting pitches you can drive. The problem with players like Byrd and Blalock is that they’re not even waiting for that good pitch, they’re just swinging at the first thing close.
"Hustle doesn't cost a dime and it looks good." - Pete Rose as Channeled by Marcus Lemon
I looked at the Rangers P/PA this year vs. last year the other day
http://www.lonestarball.com/2009/5/19/880595/23-15#15935838
Basically what I found was that the only guys who have really regressed in a big way in P/PA from last year where Byrd, Young and Salty (and Salty’s P/PA is still pretty good, though he hasn’t been walking this year). And there have been some marked improvements in P/PA this year like Kinsler and Cruz.
So really this idea that the lack of discipline is solely Rudy’s fault is kind of a misnomer (one that I admittedly have been guilty of propagating this year). Basically what really hurt us is three of our four most patient hitters from last year (Bradley, Boggs and Vazquez) are gone or in the minors, and they’ve been replaced by Blalock and Andrus, who have been very impatient this year. Perhaps Byrd and Young’s decline in discipline can still be laid at Rudy’s feet, but overall it’s been the change in personell that’s hurt us the most.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
Nice research baseball Jesus
This is why when we do replace these guys with the likes of Smoak, it’ll get better.
I still expect Salty to start walking more, and he’s really gotten better since the beginning of the season.
"Hustle doesn't cost a dime and it looks good." - Pete Rose as Channeled by Marcus Lemon
2008 obp rankings >100 PA
MB, Cruz, Byrd, Kinsler, Hamilton, Vazquez
Boggs was 13th at .333 which was below the team avg.
I am not sure how to assess P/PA by itself. I do know that one of the gripes many around here have is their 1st pitch swinging. This year they swinging at the first pitch 34% of their PAs. League average is 26%. Last year the numbers were 30% and 27%.
Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year
Other Problem
Once every few games he hits a ball well so he kinda just decides that it is right to keep using that shitty approach
Byrd on the other hand can go fuck himself right now
ill accept that to an extent for a power hitter, but not Marlon
Call me crazy
But I’d like to see this team be sellers at the deadline, as long as they don’t sell any pitching. Send Blalock and Byrd to the highest bidders, bring up Smoak, and take your chances with Murph and AJ in the lineup.
This team does need a Heath Bell or Juan Cruz type in the pen. So if we’re buyers, I hope it’s for something like that.
That's why they call them business sox
It's McCarthy's fault
they don’t get on base more, obviously. Well, maybe Feldman is to blame, not sure.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
I've held the same view of Blalock forever.
I remember screaming at the TV about him for swinging at the first pitch. Line drive or GIDP, it always irritated the hell out of me. I wasn’t even interested in sabermetrics at the time, but I still knew that working the pitch count in one at-bat drove up the opposing pitcher’s pitch count, which either forced him from the game earlier than intended, and eventually meant he’d throw a crappy pitch because he tired towards the end of the game.
I remember reading somewhere that high-SLG/mediocre-to-low-OBP teams are very streaky and inconsistent in their offensive production, which makes a lot of sense when you step back and think about it.
I’m not quite ready to crucify Marlon Byrd because he’s cheap and plays great defense (well…he did last year; here’s hoping this turns around as well…) in the outfield, but he has to start walking more. It kills me to watch him bat these days.
Blalock is still projected to hit 46 bombs this year
(hit one off the top of the fence today) and has a lifetime .335-.340 obp (over 5-6 year career) yet he’s THE problem.
Complete bullshit.
Yeah, AJones could help but he needs to be in a mix with Nellie Cruz (did I see the OPS below .700?) riding some pine along with Crush.
I don’t think Blalock should be hitting clean up but that’s on the dumbass manager we’re still trying to overcome.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
He can't be counted on to stay healthy or play defense
He’s also emblematic of the impatience and streaky nature of this team. He’s had some big hits this year, but I’ll take my chances with AJ or Smoak.
That's why they call them business sox
He's as healthy as he was in 2003-2006
and who really gives an F about “emblematic” when you’re still leading the AL West?
Seriously.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on May 21, 2009 11:28 PM CDT up reply actions
Anyone cares about beating the teams outside of the ALW
cares about what’s wrong with this offense. We’ve played doormats. Mind you, it’s great that we beat them. And, you can’t seriously think he’s the same all star caliber player was earlier in his career. Pointing to his career numbers is near-sided and naive. He’s not that guy. He, along with most of the other Rangers don’t see enough pitches, don’t get on base, and lose games when they don’t hit the long ball.
So,yeah, I give a fuck that he’s the poster child of why this team can’t score against top pitchers. And I have my doubts that we’ll still be leading the west if LAA gets healthy, and we can’t beat good teams.
That's why they call them business sox
I said that he's THE problem?
Really?
And I’d rather see Blalock riding the pine than Davis, given that Davis is playing as well as Blalock and given that Davis is going to be here going forward.
Cruz had an 813 OPS heading into today’s game and has played a great defensive RF, so I’m at a loss as to why you’d want him to sit, either.
by Adam J. Morris on May 21, 2009 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions
Cruz has / had a .625 OPS the last 28 days
and his defense…which will show tons of athleticism does not much in the way of brains.
Remember, he’s 29 in July (older than Hank) and we’re still waiting for his first good year in The Show.
In RF – He’s a dumb OF with crazy tools and you’re being kind if you say anything else. Wonderful arm but the dumbass routes he takes to fly-balls negate most of the positives.
Can Andruw play RF?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on May 22, 2009 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions
Cruz
Is the most dangerous hitter on this team. Yep. In terms of pitchers fearing to feed him anything. More than Hamilton, more than Kinsler, more than MY, more than Blalock. Pitchers/scouts/ have adjusted to his adjustments, now it’s up to him to adjust further. But don’t take my word for it. Ask Josh, or MY or Kinsler.
And for grins, he’s not dumb. Didn’t his side win versus the infielders in the Triple Play games?
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 12:25 AM CDT up reply actions
Somebody needs to say it, Ed
Bullshit.
I like him (now) but he’s nowhere near Josh or Ian presently and has much more to prove before anybody can logically put him in the same sentence as MY or Hank.
When he actually has one good season in The Show, just one, we’ll start talking about Nelson Cruz and exactly what kind of “dangerous hitter” he is.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on May 22, 2009 12:30 AM CDT up reply actions
You sure do change your mind pretty quickly
It used to be that Cruz would never amount to anything. That was a guarantee. If you said otherwise, you’re a dumbass. Then it was Cruz’s success was just a small sample size (won’t even mention the hypocrisy you’ve shown there with Blalock). Then you were on board the Cruz bandwagon and said you knew it since you saw him in ST that he was going to be good this year. Now, he’s got to show that he can put up one good season in The Show before talking about him being any kind of a dangerous hitter.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Nope
We don’t go by skin color in this part of town. Who else in the lineup is generally pitched around? Thought so.
Now here is bullshit (other than yours). From Rev, who is comically abusive of flowing prose, but just doesn’t get it. “While the Rangers were in Detroit showing that a real baseball stadium could contain their Palmeiroesque offense, Joe Saunders was showing that he can handle a major league offense when he faces them in a park with major league dimensions.” This team would beat Saunders playing in the Grand Canyon. It ain’t how far you hit ‘em, it’s how often and how hard.
/parody
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions
skin color?
I didn’t read anything you wrote after I read that.
more specific, please?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on May 22, 2009 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions
Your attitude
Has often reflected squint eyed narrow minded racist undertones. I’d guess you don’t mean to come off that way, but it makes me visualize a pear shaped troglodyte whose eyes are about 1/2 inch apart pointing at other anthropoids and chanting “bad, bad”. So you stopped reading. What caused that, a dart to the sensitive self-consciousness?
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 12:48 AM CDT up reply actions 1 recs
My attitude.
Fuck you, old man.
I speak my mind and enough with the Don Zimmer-he’s -somebody’s-grandpa-so-be-nice-treatment.
I came correct on Nelson Cruz (after ripping him for a long, long time) this spring and thought he had a chance to finally meet his potential. I said, look it up, that I thought his projections were right there in front of us the whole time. I’m expecting 25 bombs, 90 steaks and an OPS around .900.
He still takes dumbass routes to flyballs in the OF although he has wonderful athletic talent.
Going into this year, he’s had around 600 career major league plate appearances and that I thought he’d do this year what he’s done in said plate appearances in The Show.
The racist crap…whatever.
I have made it more than clear how I felt about Milton Bradley the hitter (one of the smartest I’ve ever seen). Joe Morgan is the smartest all-around baseball player I ever saw next to Barry Bonds. Magic Johnson is my favorite basketball player of all time (he made everybody around him better) but LeBron James is making his case as well.
So put the racist crap right next to your box of Depends, ok?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on May 22, 2009 12:58 AM CDT up reply actions
Great
I have no depends, and don’t require Asian style respect for age. And no one should step back from speaking their mind so long as some attempt is made to be objective and civil. I should admit I get that flavor of opinion from reading harsh and repetitive commentary about Ron Washington, Elvis Andrus, and less harsh but equally skeptical trains of thought about Cruz. My opinion stands without concession or apology – so in this case I speak my mind as well.
Feel better?
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions
The racism accusation was yet another
cheap-shot and I’d had enough.
So would somebody who was supposedly racist also go out of his way to say nice things about a kid like Brandon Boggs?
Did we conveniently forget about that one as well?
I was all over LSB and NMLR talking about him (“The Thinking Man’s Player”) but that’s conveniently forgotten because one of your favorite players was being picked on by that racist Josey Wales.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
Well if it helps
I just think you’re a jackass. Not a racist though.
I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'
Yes you have supported Boggs
And I also like his makeup and that he’s a switch hitter and a good LF’er with an accurate arm. If I’m wrong and it’s because of wanting to defend a favorite of mine, then I’m doing jackassery. I guess it may have set me off.
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 1:27 AM CDT up reply actions
And for the record, I would never vote for Obama
but I also think Jackie Robinson is one of the most important Americans of the 20th Century.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
I'm not racist
See, I have this black friend. I can’t possibly be racist.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
This is the new line for my troll blocker.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
Gold Ed, gold
it makes me visualize a pear shaped troglodyte whose eyes are about 1/2 inch apart pointing at other anthropoids and chanting "bad, bad". So you stopped reading. What caused that, a dart to the sensitive self-consciousness?
I'm Matt mutha-effing Bush, bitches, and mutha-eff East County.
"I'm as passionate and knowlegeable as any fan out there." Josey Wales
by Brian Thomas on May 22, 2009 1:22 PM CDT up reply actions
The Low Road
Really, it is not appropriate to accuse anybody that doesn’t like Ron Washington as a manager as a racist, or anybody that disagrees with Jon Daniels as a GM as an antisemitic. It would appear to me, most of the people that read this blog are not Ron Washington fans, are they all racists? You can say Josey Wales is a dumb ass based on whatever baseball facts you want to argue, but lets stick to the High Road, and not get stuck on the low road of muck.
by SanDiegoKev on May 22, 2009 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions
My bad
Writing angry is not good for one’s peace of mind.
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions
dumbass routes he takes to fly-balls
And how did you make this assessment? Live at the game? TV?
Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year
It wasn't statistically, I know that much
Since he’s leading RFs in Range runs which is hard to if you take dumbass routes to fly balls.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Cruz took a dumbass route to a ball in Det
last month and again today.
It wasn’t the first time this year or last or in 2007 or in 2006.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on May 22, 2009 12:32 AM CDT up reply actions
Just curious
How could you tell what route he took since the cameras rarely show the OF positioning or the routes they take to the ball? And if he takes these dumbass routes, wouldn’t that show in some kind of statistic out there? Anyone have Nelson Cruz’s plus/minus available (a Bill James approved stat).
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
+/- really needs to be made available to the public
Keeping it exclusively behind a subscription wall is a Selig-esque thing to do, IMO.
"Hi, I’m a fucking horsefaced moron." - John Lackey to Ian Kinsler, 5/16/09
"That start was like somebody on a deathbed suddenly jumping up and doing the Lindy Hop, then speeding away on a pogo stick while playing the fiddle." - Telegraph on Matt Harrison
They're trying to make money off of it
Can’t blame them. Just doesn’t mean that I have to pay for a subscription to their site when there is some pretty good and readily available statistics out there. Its the same reason I really can’t see much of a reason to buy a BP membership anymore.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
I was under the impression that +/-
isn’t publicly available because it’s done by video review of every play. Is this wrong?
I included all +/- numbers compiled through May 18th the other day, for what that's worth
by Joey Matschulat on May 22, 2009 1:48 AM CDT up reply actions
Good stuff man.
"BIg whoop, wanna fight about it?"
by lost in space on May 22, 2009 1:59 AM CDT up reply actions
Cruz' route on the foul fly 5/21
The end of the field level granstand down the first base line just out at about a diagonal intersect of 60 degrees by 90 degrees, about 12 feet from the foul line at its’ narrowest point. Cruz was straightaway in RF, a little deep. With a guestimated 3-4 seconds of hang time, he “got there” but pulled up a yard short of the corner of the stands and did not catch the ball. I suppose it could have been caught, but it would clearly have risked injury. Grieve commented on it at some length.
Another flyball out to RF on 5-21, Cruz did circle in a small arc from his right to his left. I didn’t hit that ball, but it looked like it may have sliced a little. He caught it..
"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -
"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce
by Ed Coffin on May 22, 2009 12:59 AM CDT up reply actions
I have to agree he takes some poor routes.
I have no idea how those defensive scoring systems work. But I doubt they take into account how an OF reads the ball off the bat. He let a relatively easy out drop for a single the other day, and even got some home boos. Tom and Josh were speculating sun, but Tom even said that shouldn’t be a problem in RF at that time of day.
Regardless, I like the guy, think he can be an asset defensively in the OF. Great arm, nice speed, et al., but I think questioning his routes has merit. I surely wouldn’t replace him.
"I saw your act, just didn't make it for me. Just a lot of fluff."
It will show up in the stats
If you are constantly taking poor routes, you’re range will suffer. If a player is able to show great range despite taking poor routes, then that just shows you how great his talent is that he can screw up getting to the ball, but still make the catch.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Cruz defense
Cruz currently has a 3.8 UZR and a 19.6 UZR/150. That’s tied for second best out of all Major League RFs. I’m beginning to wonder if you’re blind if you are even considering benching Cruz for Jones in the OF.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
yikes i knew he was slumping but didnt know the month sample was so bad
him, davis, blalock, kins… hammy out most of the time….. no wonder we are struggling to score.
the preceding post was a great success.
You can't even keep track of your idiocy any more...
In response to this post, you said Davis is “one of the best young power hitters in the game and we’re lucky to have him.”
Yet now you want to see him “riding some pine.” You simply cannot justify starting Blalock and benching Davis, given that (a) they’re providing the same production this year and (b) Blalock will be gone after this year.
Also, given that Blalock has proven he cannot hit left-handed pitching consistently (an argument you gave up on here), then doesn’t it make sense to bench him more against left-handed pitching in favor of Jones at DH?
Also, one final question set (that you will undoubtedly ignore): If Blalock is projected to hit 46 homers and you think he should be the one player in question who starts everyday, then why shouldn’t he be the cleanup hitter? I mean, Blalock has no defensive value and cannot stay healthy if he plays the field, so the least he should do is hit well enough to hit cleanup, right? And given that you want Blalock to get daily starts at the expense of guys like Davis, Cruz, and Jones, then who exactly do you want starting at DH ahead of Blalock?
Ignore the "In response to this post"
Although I was going to link to another example where you have been ignoring difficult questions, I decided to give you a break but failed to update the intro to my post.
And when you analyze career stats
Hank having an obp around or at .270 is strange.
The .550ish slugging % is very normal and you don’t bench hitters like this when you’re trying to improve your offense.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
x
Hank having an obp around or at .270 is strange.
The .550ish slugging % is very normal and you don’t bench hitters like this when you’re trying to improve your offense.
That’s crap. The .550ish slugging percentage isn’t normal, and he’s not slugging .550. He’s slugging .526, which would be the highest of his career over a full season. His career slugging is .468, and his last two full seasons, he slugged .431 and .401.
The only reason I can see for you to be pushing the Hank bandwagon so far, despite the fact that he’s not been very good this season, is that you know he’s gone after the season and you want to bitch about how Jonny Donuts blew it by not keeping him around. You can’t really do that if Hank is going to post a sub-800 OPS as a DH.
by Adam J. Morris on May 21, 2009 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions
In his defense
He’s been defending Blalock for a while. Although I think it usually came up when discussing JD trading him and involved something along the lines of , “JD is going to trade away a HOF caliber talent and get nothing but magic beans in return”
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Right...
After lambasting JD for picking up the option.
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008
LOL
I forgot about that. JD’s a moron for resigning Young and picking up Blalock’s option because of this small market payroll we have to have, but they are his favorite players and it would have been unforgivable if JD let them get away.
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Actually...
I said complete bullshit.
Isn’t Hank’s career obp sitting at .334?
When I go to baseballreference.com (which is where I went to disprove everything you said about CYoung in the podcast) I see that Hank Fucking Blalock had the following slugging %’s.
2003 – .522
2004 – .500
2007 – .543 (yes, it was only 208 ab’s)
2008 – .508 (yes, it was only 258 ab’s)
Those numbers make me think his 2009 slugging % of .526 is not a fluke.
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
And when you add up all four of those years you
come up with a total of 2073 which divided by 4 which = an average slugging % of . 518
Anything else?
"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."
by Josey Wales on May 22, 2009 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions
Is that .550?
And you seem to be missing a couple of years there. What happened to those years? Did Blalock go on a long sabbatical?
By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.
-The Outlaw
Damn Damn Damn
"BIg whoop, wanna fight about it?"
by lost in space on May 22, 2009 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions
So Holland will have to hit tomorrow
which reminds me how much I hate pitchers hitting. It’s stupid that the NL doesn’t have a DH. I wonder, when was the last time Holland hit?
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
That should be fun to watch
"BIg whoop, wanna fight about it?"
by lost in space on May 22, 2009 1:37 AM CDT up reply actions
He's been working with Rudy ..
¡Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!
I came here to split hairs. And you?
by inactive lsb user on May 22, 2009 10:53 AM CDT up reply actions
Rudy and OBP
Rudy has been the Rangers’ ,hitting instructor for the last 14 years. He also had the same position with the Astros from ‘90-’93. Some stats…
Avg OBP ranking in the AL: 6.6
Avg AL Champion OBP rank: 4 (That includes DET at 12 in ’06 and CHW at 11 in ’05.)
In only 4 years (1998, 1999, 2001, 2008) have they finished in the top 4.
In only 4 years (2001, 2005, 2006, 2008) have they had a higher OBP then the AL champ.
In his 4 years in Houston their avg NL ranking was 8.75.
In the 3 years after he left they ranked 2nd, 1st and 3rd in OBP.
Rudy is a excellent technician. His students have the skins to prove it. Simply put, his philosophy is: See the ball, hit the ball. But I do wonder about his tactical teachings. This team is not very good at situational hitting. I am not talking about bunting and hitting behind runners. They don’t take pitches when a pitcher is struggling to throw strikes. They swing at too many first pitches instead of waiting for a better pitch to hit. They seem to be always swinging for the fences.
I am not in the clubhouse or dugout so I don’t know what RW and Rudy are telling the players. All I (and we) can do is watch the games and analyze the statistics. OBP isn’t the be all, end all hitters stat. But I do think that it is one indicator of a team’s approach at the plate. What baffles me is how this team, with pretty much the same players as last year, can rank 2nd in OBP in 2008 but is currently 11th this year.
Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year
bottom line
I don’t want to see so many 3 minute innings and opposing pitchers with double digit strikeout totals
When I looked through the stats previously
I concluded that while Rudy wasn’t the best at OBP, he certainly wasn’t the worst. The Rangers actually usually are middle of the pack in OBP.
I also think the other part of his job, the swing mechanics, I hear nothing but rave reviews.
I think the answer is keep Rudy doing what he is doing, and have the Manager stress patience, and sit people who are having problems seeing the ball and are swinging at everything.
"I'd praised catcher Max Ramirez two weeks ago, but after his continued struggles I'm increasingly convinced he's not going to pan out." - crops.mlblogs.com
theres the problem
have the Manager stress patience, and sit people who are having problems seeing the ball and are swinging at everything.
I am not convinced the players are listening to the manager when it comes to their approach at the plate. And it certainly appears that he doesn’t hold them accountable.
Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year
It's who they are.
They are aggressive hitters. I’m 5’7", I can try to jump higher but I’m not going to get taller.
G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....
I concur.
i think the offensive approach can be tweaked. Just gotta get the message sent. And I do believe Andruw needs more playing time. I can’t believe I just typed that.
Man, I love winning! You know? It's like better than losing!
I do agree
we need to see AJ more. RW needs to spread the patience at the plate religion, and if some players keep wanting to hack at their at bats, they need to know that they will sit the occasional game out. If it means AJ plays every game while Blalock and CD alternate riding the pine, so be it. That second AB from CD was absolutely absurd, striking out swinging at 3 straight pitches out of the strike zone.
The sub 300 OBPs definitely have to go. They are just ridiculous and absolutely shouldn’t be tolerated this late in the season. The players putting them up are all capable of better, and most of them have terrible approaches at the plate where they swing at balls way out of the zone. The message needs to be sent. If you swing at everything, and fail, you will be riding the pine. You swing at everything, you damn well better be Vlad Guerrero in his prime, or you are going to get days off to watch some pitches.
"I'd praised catcher Max Ramirez two weeks ago, but after his continued struggles I'm increasingly convinced he's not going to pan out." - crops.mlblogs.com
Gameday picture of that at-bat
http://www.bbtia.com/the-clubhouse/2009/5/22/the-worst-at-bat-of-all-time.html (exaggeration prevalent in the title, but sue me)
Didn’t actually realize until just now that Davis/Blalock are 1/2 in the BB/K department in the AL. The potential harm in riding Andruw until he considerably cools is probably outweighed by the harm being inflicted by that lack of out avoidance.
by Joey Matschulat on May 22, 2009 3:09 AM CDT reply actions
No, BB/K
As in worst in the AL, not best. Apologies if that didn’t come across clearly.
by Joey Matschulat on May 22, 2009 3:36 AM CDT up reply actions
Andruw will undoubtedly cool
but does anyone really think he is going to cool to last years levels? It wouldn’t at all surprise me to see him end up with an OPS around 850 even with a considerable number of PAs.
"I'd praised catcher Max Ramirez two weeks ago, but after his continued struggles I'm increasingly convinced he's not going to pan out." - crops.mlblogs.com
he looks a lot more like old school andruw jones than he has in years
if we could get the guy to lose another 25 lbs i think he could be an everyday CFer in this league another 3 seasons.
mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.
Regarding CD...
and taking this AB into accout…I’m wondering if he is actually having a sight problem?
I’ve thought this before, but this AB really makes it look like this is a possibility.
In 1991, I was 8 and thought Kirby Puckett would come beat up the monster in the closet if I prayed hard enough.
by GhettoBear04 on May 17, 2009 5:26 PM CDT
Sweet Jesus.
That is an incredibly disturbing image. I think I would be more prepared to handle the rest of my day if you had posted goatse instead.
But, but, but
I hear that there’s NO WAY that Chris Davis will continue this.
After all nobody else has ever had a K% rate of 40% or more!
He’s just gonna get better. How? I don’t know, but he just is!
R
NEVER GO BACK TO DETROIT AHHH!
We kept bone ing our selves ever time we had a shot Its like the kryptonite for texas ranger bats . The combo of us screwing us and the f ing bermuda friggin triange of detroit it will do you in! We have to sweep houston LA only 2 back now!
by Nah ha ha He He on May 22, 2009 3:26 AM CDT reply actions
OT: Cowboys shopping Ellis
Not a surprise
Calvin Watkins of Fanhouse reports that the Cowboys have put OLB Greg Ellis on the trading block.
Ellis, 34, is due to earn $4.15 million in the final year of his contract. He’s been sent him home from OTAs, so the team is serious about dealing him to open up a starting spot for 2007 first-rounder Anthony Spencer. The Cowboys are targeting the Bengals and Patriots, though the Pats are said to have no interest.
Bengals could use a good person.
Ellis
It would seem he would fit a team running the 4-3 better.
I always hated how much the guy griped every year, but really he sort of had a legit beef when every year theres talk of him going and losing playing time
"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg
Always nice to target teams that aren't interested.
Do your thing, Jerry!
¡Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!
I came here to split hairs. And you?
by inactive lsb user on May 22, 2009 10:56 AM CDT up reply actions
very good write up
I think we’re all starting to see that Milton Bradley is missed, which is what I said all along last year. Even though we’re cranking out the HRs, this offense is much less effective without him in the middle. And further, of course, Hamilton’s struggles and injuries have been clearly the biggest obstacle for this team to overcome. I have to think that we would’ve scored a few more runs in the Detroit series with him in there healthy, and won 1 or maybe even 2 games because of it.
"Hang-Dai, Wu...Hang-Fu$&ing-Dai"
by Walter Sobchak on May 22, 2009 12:19 PM CDT reply actions
Marlon Byrd's defense
Anyone have a diagnosis on why it’s been so bad this year?
Slower reaction time?
Less speed?
Fluke?
Small sample?
While most of us knew he likely wasn’t going to keep up the defense from last year, he hasn’t been negative in a while even in small samples, And he has a significantly negative UZR in LEFT FIELD….
R
Its hiding out with his
patience at the plate.
"I'd praised catcher Max Ramirez two weeks ago, but after his continued struggles I'm increasingly convinced he's not going to pan out." - crops.mlblogs.com

by 




























