Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: World Soccer Digest for Soccer Fans!

Friday morning Rangers things

Texas Rangers starting pitcher Brandon McCarthy throws to the Oakland Athletics in the first inning of a baseball game in Oakland, Thursday, May 7, 2009.(AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

More photos » by Marcio Jose Sanchez - AP

6 months ago: Texas Rangers starting pitcher Brandon McCarthy throws to the Oakland Athletics in the first inning of a baseball game in Oakland, Thursday, May 7, 2009.(AP Photo/Marcio Jose Sanchez)

It was a nice 5 game run, and really, if the streak is going to end, I think I'd just as soon see the team lose in a clunker like this as lose in a close game that could have gone either way. 

But yeah, that sucked yesterday.

Evan Grant has an explanation from Brandon McCarthy, who followed up three strong innings with an awful fourth inning, of what he started doing wrong:

"I threw a bad pitch to start the inning and some poor quality pitches after that," said McCarthy, who fell to 3-1 for the season. "It was unacceptable. And then the pitch to Cust was awful. The game just got to fast and I didn’t slow things down enough."

McCarthy’s more in-depth explanation: Once he fell into an old bad habit on the mound, he couldn’t identify it quickly enough to fix it before the inning fell apart.

* * *

McCarthy said he felt like he fell into a practice of "pulling off the ball," which makes his fastball either run way too far inside against left-handed hitters or drift too far over the plate against them. The walk to Giambi was the product of what happens when he comes too far inside; the homer was the product of the other problem.

Jeff Wilson's game story includes some quotes from McCarthy about how he has to put an end to having the one bad inning that ends up being a black mark on his starts this season.

What has been so frustrating about McCarthy this season is that he'll have several innings where you see a guy who looks like a legit top of the rotation pitcher, and then he has something like the bottom of the 4th yesterday where the wheels come off.  It is maddening.

Wilson also has a piece up that discusses how, along with the new conditioning program, the Ranger pitchers are getting amped up scouting reports, with Mike Maddux and Andy Hawkins being much more "intense" in the work they do with the starters in regards to the preparation and scouting.

Derek Holland says he has learned from the pitch to Jim Thome that he left out over the plate the other night, that resulted in a three-run game-changing double. 

Ron Washington said that Taylor Teagarden will be Matt Harrison's personal catcher from here on out.

Over at the DMN blog, Richard Durrett discusses the state of Eddie Guardado and Kris Benson.

 

0 recs  |  Comment 112 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Teagarden catching for Harrison

Personally I think it’s a good idea, but what is the point of making a public announcement about it?

Doctor please. Some more of these.

by tricer on May 8, 2009 9:27 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well

I’d wager someone asked him.

by Adam J. Morris on May 8, 2009 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Will this increase

TT’s palying time or will Salty catch day games after a night game?

Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year

by RangerMad on May 8, 2009 9:36 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

personal catchers are ghey

mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.

by Jayslick on May 8, 2009 10:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

morally

i support monogamous pitching/catcher relationships.

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 8, 2009 11:17 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think we all saw this coming.

I pointed it out a couple of days ago( I’m SO smart;ok, lucky really) when we were debating the “trading catchers” situation. I have heard grumblings here at LSB about the disdain of the personal catcher. Why? Not trying to flame anyone, I just don’t see the problem if the 2 work together so well. Plus, it’s good way to give Salty a break and get TT time behind the plate.

Your 2009 Snow Monkey Ambassador

by Parman on May 8, 2009 3:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Worsh on Holland
“The guy has progressed every time,” Washington said. “He’s got a maturity and a mound presence, and he’s got good stuff. [Wednesday] night he pitched. He threw breaking balls and changeups, not only fastballs.”

Holland threw 16 pitches Wednesday and 15 of them were fastballs.

Doctor please. Some more of these.

by tricer on May 8, 2009 9:28 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Wash was taking about

in the bullpen before Holland came into the game. :)

Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year

by RangerMad on May 8, 2009 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

batters vs McCarthy

this season:

first time up .255/.315/.404
second time .311/.407/.622

Doctor please. Some more of these.

by tricer on May 8, 2009 9:37 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

At times, McCarthy does have top of the rotation stuff

but after the 5th inning he’s either done for the evening or on the shortest leash possible.

So while his stuff can be great occasionally, he’s never going to be a top of the rotation pitcher because top of the rotation pitchers occasionally sail into the 7th & 8th innings.

As long as he can stay healthy, he’s okay to have on your staff but everybody needs to realize he’s a #4 or more likely 5th starter.

He’s also the pitcher that Wash needs to pair up with Holland.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

x
he’s never going to be a top of the rotation pitcher because top of the rotation pitchers occasionally sail into the 7th & 8th innings

Seems a premature prediction, given McCarthy’s youth and injury history.

by brettgardner on May 8, 2009 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

gardner

Do you ever remember seeing McCarthy go into the 8th inning of any start he’s had as a Ranger?

I don’t and neither does Baseballreference.com.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No shit.

But he was a reliever before coming here, and has been hurt the vast majority of his time here.

He also doesn’t have a perfect game, but I don’t count that as a demerit in the TORP/Piece of Shit debate, either.

by brettgardner on May 8, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

So you think McCarthy is going to eventually be the type

of pitcher that regularly sails into the 7th or 8th inning of his starts?

If so, why?

I don’t think he’ll ever be that type of pitcher.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No

I don’t think that, but I don’t think he won’t, either.

I want to see a full season out of him before I make any long-term projections on what he is/can be.

by brettgardner on May 8, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The only progress I've seen out of McCarthy this year

has been his health.

He’s pretty much the same pitcher he’s always been in Texas and I see no hope of it ever changing..

Right after Crash Davis gives CJ the “Shower Shoe Speech” he also needs to tell McCarthy to “stop thinking so much. It hurts the team.”

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Really?

I’ve seen him progress on his strike-throwing with each start this year, the 4th-inning meltdown excluded.

I’m not going to underestimate the importance of his improved health.

by brettgardner on May 8, 2009 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think your mentality is right there with Linus

and the Great Pumpkin.

Keep sitting in that pumpkin patch waiting for that grand appearance or major change from McCarthy but I’m moving forward.

If healthy, my bar of expectations rate McCarthy as a 4th – 5th starter and that ain’t changing any time soon.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i think we're getting more from McCarthy

this year than we expected. In McCarthy’s first five starts, he had given up 3, 3, 3, 4, 1 runs respectively. Does he have room for improvement? Yes.

Ultimately, if McCarthy does improve upon that performance he can be the quality of a # 2 or 3, at the worst, he is still a quality arm in the rotation. I don’t expect ace stuff because of his injury history, but health will be a large factor in his success along with throwing strikes. If he can do this, he can be a solid #3. I’ll take that.

If a woman has to choose between catching a fly ball and saving an infant's life, she will choose to save the infant's life without even considering if there are men on base. ~Dave Barry

by NothinG on May 8, 2009 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Excluding yesterday's start

McCarthy’s done better than anyone of us could have expected. In 5 starts he’s gone 5-6 innings and never allowed more than 4 runs. Not spectacular, but he’s consistently been able to keep us in games

(Wife) "So what do you want to watch on the T.V.? UFC or porn?"
(Husband) "Hmm... well, porn, I guess."

by mtex on May 8, 2009 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"while his stuff can be great occasionally"

I’ve never seen McCarthy with anything resembling “great stuff” since he has been a Ranger.

Doctor please. Some more of these.

by tricer on May 8, 2009 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I'm throwing around the word "great" judiciously

but at times, McCarthy looks like a very good pitcher….like the first thee innings yesterday v. Oakland.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he's saying

You’re not using the word judiciously.

by brettgardner on May 8, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not giving the respect to the word that I should.

John Danks was great in his playoff clinching outing v. Minnesota last year.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Or in his truncated outing last Saturday

v. Chi – he looked very good.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Me either.

We’ve seen him flash a plus-plus changeup, but we get excited when his fastball touches 92.

by tyd3311 on May 8, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not defending McCarthy's awful 4th inning

but it is nice to have him recognize that the primary problem is between his ears on these big innings. Damage control ends up deciding so many of these games.

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 9:39 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I like the note

about increased preparation with more scouting and video. Do every little thing you can to make the pitchers throw to their potential. I think McCarthy gets more consistent as the year progresses. He hasn’t been on the mound a whole lot the last couple years, he just needs reps.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on May 8, 2009 9:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

The notes on the newly intensified scouting and video prep

don’t seem to put the approach that Connor took to preparation in an especially positive light, do they?

I’m all Fox Mulderish on Brandon McCarthy, but he’s making it hard.

by Snark on May 8, 2009 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

which begs the question

why is he still with the organization?

It has been speculated that his constant mechanical tinkering was detrimental, so I just assumed that he must have been kept aboard because he was knowledgable/hard working as far as preparing game plans. So if he doesn’t do either of those things, what possible reason is there to keep him around?

Doctor please. Some more of these.

by tricer on May 8, 2009 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

speaking of Conor here

I realize that was worded poorly.

Doctor please. Some more of these.

by tricer on May 8, 2009 9:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

As with most things here

the amount of blame assigned to Connor for the pitching is probably vastly overstated.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on May 8, 2009 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Likely true.

But even if so, I don’t understand why there was apparently so much room for improvement in terms of pre-game preparation under the Maddux/Hawkins regime.

by Snark on May 8, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

And the amount of credit towards Nolan Ryan

for overhauling the pitching staff and philosophy grows by the day.

"Dying ain't hard. It's living that's hard."

by Josey Wales on May 8, 2009 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agreed, plus McCarthy is only 25 right now

with a lot of injury time the last two years, so it is not like he is an old pitcher. I am glad to see that he is able to go back out for his next start. Making it to the ASB without getting injuried will be a huge accomplishment and I think his pitching will improve considerably if he can get that many reps.

Godwin's Law Version 2.0 (Rangers Edition)
"As a Ranger discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Danks, Volquez, or Young approaches one."

by LBBRangerFan on May 8, 2009 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Agree 100%.

I love the fact that they are using the tools they have at their disposal—-I mean, this is not a new science here. I can remember many times in the past we here have thrown a fit over a certain pitch or pitch sequence to a particular batter. Was it lack of preparation or lack of execution? Hmmm…

What has been so frustrating about McCarthy this season is that he’ll have several innings where you see a guy who looks like a legit top of the rotation pitcher, and then he has something like the bottom of the 4th yesterday where the wheels come off. It is maddening.

Reps, reps, reps. BMac has almost missed the last entire two years. Talk about shunting any forward progress…

"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008

by Rodney on May 8, 2009 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This sound like another Texas pitcher
What has been so frustrating about McCarthyPadilla this every season is that he’ll have several innings where you see a guy who looks like a legit top of the rotation pitcher, and then he has something like the bottom of the 4th yesterday where the wheels come off. It is maddening.

Except, of course, in his last start.

by NorCalRangersFan on May 8, 2009 10:45 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

agree with tball

on the preparation. Begs the question of what the F#$% they were doing between starts the last few years.

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 9:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Rehabbing...

The Texas Rangers have been synonymous with explosive firepower ever since they emptied 130 rounds into Bonnie Parker and Clyde Barrow in 1934. - Alyssa Milano

by bking on May 8, 2009 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i personally blame myself

for yesterday’s offensive onslaught from the A’s. I shouldn’t have bashed their offense as much as I did. I still think it sucks and they are terribly overrated by Beane pole smokers, but my adamant stand yesterday was asking for karma to bite me in the ass, and as usual, she obliged.

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 8, 2009 9:52 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

We were due

a clunker. At least FX2 had the day off. I’m hoping Hamilton’s reinsertion into the lineup reinvigorates the run scoring machine.

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

the worst part of yesterday

was Guardardo’s ninth inning. Shit like that will only keep buying him chances, and frankly, it is time for fresh blood. With the game so far out of reach like that, I think I would have preferred to see him get hit again, just to help force the issue.

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 8, 2009 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

i also think Beavan's start yesterday

is worth bringing up again in the daily thread. He pitched a complete game without giving up an earned run to the best offense in the most hitter friendly league in the minors. It was the signature, status-changing effort we have been waiting for all year from a starter.

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 8, 2009 9:54 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Is his velocity

back up a bit this year?

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

more importantly...

is he still doing this when he gets a strike out?

by sam in so cal on May 8, 2009 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is the signature, cataclysm-starting post

we have all been waiting for. I’m off to stock canned goods.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on May 8, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Someone tell Newberg to move Beavan up 5 slots or so.

Wonderboy, what is the secret of your power? Wonderboy, won't you take me far away from the mucky-muck now. -- Tenacious D

by rooster on May 8, 2009 10:29 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

McCarthy and Mechanics

He says yesterday was due to a mechanical flaw, and the thing that gets me about McCarthy is that for him, the difference between him apparently having good mechanics and bad mechanics (or, at least him feeling like his mechanics are good or bad) seems to be just a wispy thin hair of a line. He has blamed mechanics being out of whack for everything from bad innings to broken shoulders. I wonder why it seems to be such an issue, and if mechanics truly is the problem, why they get out of whack so easy?

by FuturePants on May 8, 2009 10:05 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Because he is very tall for his age.

Tall pitchers always have issues with repeatability. Also, it’s not like he has had a ton of opportunity to work on his mechanics the last two seasons.

"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008

by Rodney on May 8, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, he's tall and gangly, which often means its hard to be well coordinated.

I think the problem is more mental than physical. He’s clearly a perfectionist type. Everything has to be in place to work out well, and he panics when things are awry. That mentality has to change if he’s gonna be a TORP rather than BORP.

Yesterday, though, I wish less emphasis in the post-game comments was placed on how he lost his mechanics and more bitching about the strike zone was done. I’m not saying mechanical flaws weren’t the problem. I am saying that BMac is acutely aware of what is out of whack. Sometimes it helps one’s psyche to deflect some of that onto other things, whether justified or not.

I would have been much happier if an earlier mound visit had been made to help BMac “slow down”, help him turn off the panic button, and bitched at the ump just so BMac could get a breather and hear that it’s not always his fault that things go awry and that Wash has his back.

Wonderboy, what is the secret of your power? Wonderboy, won't you take me far away from the mucky-muck now. -- Tenacious D

by rooster on May 8, 2009 10:12 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe McCarthy didn't bitch about the strike zone

because he didn’t think that was a significant part of his problems yesterday?

by Snark on May 8, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It really doesn't matter. He needs to bitch about something to take his mind off of himself.

He needs to be less self-aware, or at least, his self-awareness needs to be less negative. Bitching about something else is a good way to vent, whether justified or not.

Wonderboy, what is the secret of your power? Wonderboy, won't you take me far away from the mucky-muck now. -- Tenacious D

by rooster on May 8, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Pitchers shouldn't bitch about the strike zone in interviews

That stuff gets back to umpires. Even though they are supposed to be above that sort of pettiness, some of them may get back at him in his next start by not giving him any close calls.

by NorCalRangersFan on May 8, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Meh.

McCarthy publicly blaming his performance on something external ~ the strike zone, the Ballpark, whatever ~ isn’t going to do him any good. If it helps McCarthy for Maddux to privately acknowledge that the strike zone was inconsistent or some such, that’s Maddux’s decision. (Based on Maddux’s public statements about his pitching philosophy, though, I doubt this is something he’s inclined to do.) To call out an ump in post-game comments as the reason for a meltdown? I simply don’t see how that helps.

by Snark on May 8, 2009 10:50 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, the public after-game blaming I thought should come from the manager.

I guess I didn’t specify that earlier. I may have in yesterday’s GDT. I think BMac said the right things.

Wonderboy, what is the secret of your power? Wonderboy, won't you take me far away from the mucky-muck now. -- Tenacious D

by rooster on May 8, 2009 10:59 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

McCarthy's mechanics

Just look at the pic at the top of this post. He looks like an anorexic stork. I have a hard time believing he will ever be a consistent pitcher. It’s going to be impossible for him to make all of those moving parts go where they are supposed on a regular basis.

LoneStarBall....You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy.

by DaheelzCM on May 8, 2009 6:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking more

bulimic flamingo, but yeah.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on May 9, 2009 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Worthless

Evan Grant still sucks, always the Ranger mouthpiece.

by Big Tex on May 8, 2009 10:06 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Well, that makes

one of you with that opinion.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on May 8, 2009 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Care to elaborate?

What should he report?

Wonderboy, what is the secret of your power? Wonderboy, won't you take me far away from the mucky-muck now. -- Tenacious D

by rooster on May 8, 2009 10:13 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

there's a hot sports opinion.

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 8, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Geez.

And Rivera has soreness in his surgically repaired shoulder. Cursed.

by tyd3311 on May 8, 2009 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

That ortiz jeresy buried in yankee stadium

did its damage before they were able to dig it up.

by death of the cool on May 8, 2009 10:11 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Yankees

may just come calling now. I wonder which pitchers we could pry from their system. What would Hughes cost?

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

such epic fail

surrounding that team right now…Cashman has to be getting desperate. I have no idea how these two teams match up, because I doubt they offer Hughes or Austin Jackson and certainly won’t offer Joba.

Would you trade Salty for Jesus Montero and David Robertson?

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 8, 2009 10:19 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Salty for those two?

No, I wouldn’t do that. I want Hughes, and I’m willing to add to Salty to get him.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on May 8, 2009 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

yeah

on second thought, that does seem a little low. I love Montero’s bat…what he is doing in the pitcher friendly FSL as a 19-20 year old is crazy. I just have no idea where he plays. I have always loved Robertson, but his walk totals are a red flag. Hughes just scares me. Scouts don’t seem to love him like they used to.

I would be more inclined to spread the risk in a trade like this, since we are probably positioned as the seller. If the Yankees added power lefty Wilkins de la Rosa to the deal, would you still say no?

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on May 8, 2009 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

wow

Hughes is still 22? Seems like he’s been around so long.

by chase182 on May 8, 2009 12:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

BMac and arb

BMac will enter his 2nd arbitration this winter after signing a $650K deal this past winter which avoided an arb hearing. If he stays healthy and makes his 30+ starts will he be worth the >$1M he will get in 2010? If his performances remain erractic like they have been through 2010, do the Rangers trade him or pay him even more $$$ in his 3 arb year?

Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year

by RangerMad on May 8, 2009 10:10 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If he stays healthy and makes progress

then absolutely he should be signed. Doubt it would be any more than 1.5 M for 2010.

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

If he stays healthy and makes 30+ starts

 then he’ll be worth the >$1 million.

Has he been erratic this year? and how will his performances remain erratic through 2010?

(Wife) "So what do you want to watch on the T.V.? UFC or porn?"
(Husband) "Hmm... well, porn, I guess."

by mtex on May 8, 2009 10:20 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

What would you like to use

as the barometer of performance?

Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year

by RangerMad on May 8, 2009 10:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you

(Wife) "So what do you want to watch on the T.V.? UFC or porn?"
(Husband) "Hmm... well, porn, I guess."

by mtex on May 8, 2009 10:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

This is very premature

given Brandon’s injury history, but I can envision he and Danks playing out their careers as middle of rotation starters and not looking back at that trade without the angst I’ve felt for 2 years. Excluding the Danks performance in the one game playoff, I think he’s been a serviceable starter but no ace in waiting. Or BMac could have a career threatening blister after next start and I could go back to my prior heartburn.

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

An "ace in waiting" Danks may or may not be

but what about 195 IP, a 2.79 SO/BB ratio, a 3.32 ERA, 3.52 FIP, and 3.85 tRA (138 ERA+, 121 tRA+), and a 1.226 WHIP as a 23 year-old qualifies Danks as having been nothing more than a “serviceable starter”?

by Snark on May 8, 2009 10:30 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a good start

I live in Round Rock- I watched Danks in high school and root for him regularly. Was upset and still am about him being traded. According to baseball reference, his career MLB WHIP as 1.35. I think that’s about right for him. BMac has a career WHIP of 1.39, and nowhere near the regular starts to iron things out. I think Danks is closer to the starter he’s been this year, than the lights out performer in that one game playoff. I could be wrong, but it is surprising to see their WHIP so close in MLB performance when one is hailed an ace in waiting and the other is appropriately derided for his injury history.

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I'm not basing anything off one playoff game.

It’s odd: you think Danks is “closer to the starter he’s been this year” than last, but his stats aren’t really that different. His ERA+ right now is 131, and his tRA+ is 118 ~ more or less in line with his performance last season. His WHIP is slightly up, and his SO/K ratio is down slightly, but there aren’t drastic differences. Maybe you feel he won’t be able to keep this up this season ~ but he’s simply been better than “serviceable” in his first five starts this season, and he was much better than serviceable over 33 starts last year.

I also think it’s odd that you’re not considering the fact that Danks’ career WHIP is heavily influenced by the 1.540 he posted in his rookie season. He’s clearly been a consistently better pitcher over his last 38 starts than he was over his first 26. (It’s strange, as well, that you’re comparing Danks’ career WHIP as a starter with McCarthy’s career WHIP as both a starter and a reliever.)

by Snark on May 8, 2009 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

SOB ratio

is reserved for Guillen.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on May 8, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I was thinking "sob" as in "cry"

but that still makes Matt a momma’s boy, I suppose.

by Snark on May 9, 2009 1:49 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I think he's pretty much what we saw in our last series

We get the chance to see him again this weekend. I like Danks. I think it’s odd to NOT include a 26 game sample size of his 07 year in a comparison. Just pointing out that your WHIP was incorrect (unless you meant to cherry pick).

by texasdoc on May 8, 2009 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The WHIP I posted

was for Danks in 2008, and is neither incorrect nor cherry-picked. If you’ll re-read the posts above, I think you’ll find I didn’t start by comparing Danks to McCarthy. I was pointing out that given the season he had last year, Danks was far more than a “serviceable starter.” If you can’t look beyond the statistics of his admittedly poor rookie season and recognize the changes he’s made and the vast improvement they’ve wrought (both in his on-the-field performance and in his stats from last season and this one), I don’t know what to tell you.

by Snark on May 9, 2009 1:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Anybody else think the Ump F'd BMac in the 4th?

his strike zone shrunk to nothing all of the sudden and pitches that were strikes in the 1st through 3rd were suddenly balls. He wasnt all over the place, he was hitting the exact same spot over and over all of the sudden they were all balls. It mindf#cked BMac, you could see it, and by the time Cust was up, he had no option but to throw it right down the middle if he had any chance of getting a strike call.

Then Cahill comes back out and gets the strike calls the whole rest of the day that Ump just stopped give BMac. It was so apparent that this happened it made me sick. That Ump single handedly screwed that game to high hell.

BMac coulda been better, and whatever his breaking ball his he needs to throw it with confidence the second time through the line up, but the calls that were all suddenly balls in the 4th were all strikes in the 1st 3 innings.

mormons stole me and held me against my will with Oklahoma beer and 12+ hour work days.

by Jayslick on May 8, 2009 11:19 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I think a large majority of people that followed the GDT yesterday agree

OTOH, some of the called 3rd strikes against the Rangers yesterday looked really good. I’m not sure a number of them didn’t agree.

(Wife) "So what do you want to watch on the T.V.? UFC or porn?"
(Husband) "Hmm... well, porn, I guess."

by mtex on May 8, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Is the delivery in the picture mechanically sound?

I’m a B-MAC fan, but that looks like it hurts. Kind of storky as opposed to the beefed up version.

¡Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!

by Chase Irwin on May 8, 2009 11:45 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

exactly what i was thinking

Looks like he’s about to do a cartwheel.

by chase182 on May 8, 2009 12:51 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

some bloggy notes from TR
* The Rangers, like all clubs have a team bus on the road that takes them from the hotel to the ballpark. Arrives about three hours before the game, in plenty of time for stretching and batting practice. A couple of the young players took it one day and were immediately set straight by some veterans: You get to the ballpark much earlier than the team bus.

* That reminds of what Mike Scioscia once told young catchers: never let a pitcher beat you to the park.

* Elvis Andrus was told in no uncertain terms in Spring Training: do not let Michael Young or Ian Kinsler beat you to the clubhouse in the morning.

http://trsullivan.mlblogs.com/

Elvis Andrus - 2009 AL Rookie of the Year

by RangerMad on May 8, 2009 4:48 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I like that very much.

"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008

by Rodney on May 8, 2009 5:56 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

B-Mac has bad form.

No wonder he gets hurt.

Separated at Birth: Alfred E. Neuman and Jon Daniels
"WHAT, ME WORRY?"

by Clueless on May 9, 2009 2:44 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Th_buckykatt_small
MNF tonight
Cd_small
Jordan Schafer Available?
Marion_small
NFL Week 11 GDT
Roger_the_alien_american_dad_small
Josh Johnson Available?
Ochomerun_small
Who is Josey Wales?
Marion_small
Mavs GDT 11/20/09
Ebbsfleet_united_logo_small
Three way deal only works if...
Small
OT: The global warming hoax exposed?
Img_0225_2_small
Pertinent Fangraphs Articles
Texas-rangers-logo-2_small
Frankie Piliere scouting for fans now

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris