Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
New Blog: RSL Soapbox for Real Salt Lake Fans!

Halladay.....


Supposedly the Angels are the 5/2 favorite to land Halladay......if reports are correct (Infielder Brandon Wood, a pitching prospect like Trevor Reckling or Jordan Walden.) How can the Rangers NOT be in the mix?

Star-divide

 

What is our equivilent of those guys (I'm not too familiar with them outside of Brandon Wood, and not too impressed with him, so far)......obviously the No-Trade is a big hurdle, but if he wants to win as he says, aren't the Rangers pretty well-positioned going forward to do that?

I know it's a long shot for Texas, but that offer from LA doesn't sound like much to me.

0 recs  |  Comment 67 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

You couldn't put some sort of indication of what this post contains in the title?

That’s pretty obnoxious.

Idle speculation is fine, of course.

But I thought maybe something had happened.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall. This was the largest auto I could afford. Should I therefore be made the subject of fun?

by thedirkatron on Jul 14, 2009 11:14 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Chris Davis

and Kiker would beat that offer…which leads me to believe that those reports are bogus.

What is this, Horseville? Because I'm surrounded by naysayers.

by clark on Jul 14, 2009 11:17 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

I'm thinking Smoak instead of Davis.

Alma para conquistarte, corazón para quererte, y vida para vivirla junto a ti.

by chrisR on Jul 14, 2009 5:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No way that deal lands Halladay

Frankly, the Angels farm system is so worthless that they aren’t getting Halladay without taking on all of Vernon Wells’ contract, as well as anyone with any value from that organization.

I don’t think the Blue Jays trade Halladay if that is all they can get for him. Or, put another way, I’d be giddy if that is all they are asking, because we could get him without giving up Smoak or Feliz

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 14, 2009 11:18 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Walden is injured

If I was Toronto’s GM I’d start off asking for Andrus and either Holland or Feliz and another lower prospect or two.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Jul 14, 2009 11:21 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

No way in hell we deal Andrus.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall. This was the largest auto I could afford. Should I therefore be made the subject of fun?

by thedirkatron on Jul 14, 2009 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I would go all you and start punting babies if we traded Andrus along with Dutch or Feliz.

"You know, I’m playing entirely too much." - Andruw Jones

"After intense analysis, I have come to the conclusion that Neftali Feliz throws fucking hard." - John Sickels

Hello Win Column

by lonestarJon on Jul 14, 2009 11:28 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Would you deal him for Halladay straight up?

Or, say, with some filler?

Andrus, Madrigal, Moreland and Engel Beltre?

I don’t think I do that.

I love, love, love Andrus and think he’s crazy valuable to this team going forward.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall. This was the largest auto I could afford. Should I therefore be made the subject of fun?

by thedirkatron on Jul 14, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't really want to give up the guys it would take to get Halladay period

But even if I was, I wouldn’t ever trade Andrus for him, even straight up. Elvis is infield D’s cornerstone, and infield D is the main thing thats propping up our pitching staff this year. I mean, who do you replace him with? Arias? Move Young back there (shudder)?

Basically, even though you’d gain a TORP I think impact of the lost D on the rest of our mediocre starting staff might largely cancel out that accquisition.

"You know, I’m playing entirely too much." - Andruw Jones

"After intense analysis, I have come to the conclusion that Neftali Feliz throws fucking hard." - John Sickels

Hello Win Column

by lonestarJon on Jul 14, 2009 11:38 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It would hurt a ton, but I'd do it, if we could get Halladay extended for 2 years

I'm Matt mutha-effing Bush, bitches, and mutha-eff East County.

"I'm as passionate and knowlegeable as any fan out there." Josey Wales

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2009 8:52 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Right, but if you're Ricky Ricardo

don’t you ask for him? They’ve had a world of suck at SS for a while now until this year, and I’m not sure they’ll resign Scutaro, who’s getting up there. I think Scutaro gets some nice offers given the sexiness of defense these days.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Jul 14, 2009 11:31 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Of course you ask for him

You probably ask for Elvis, Smoak and Feliz. And when JD stops laughing about forty minutes later (“Hey Nolan, get in here and listen to this – they actually want Elvis, Smoack AND Feliz! What do you say about that, boss??”) he rebuts with Davis, Vallejo and Boscan. Negotiations proceed from there.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 14, 2009 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Sure, maybe. But not not in like a serious way.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall. This was the largest auto I could afford. Should I therefore be made the subject of fun?

by thedirkatron on Jul 14, 2009 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I don't see why not.

Halladay is ten kinds of awesome, I’d ask the moon for him if I were to trade him away.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Jul 14, 2009 11:51 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Because guys like Andrus don't get dealt.

They just don’t.

I don’t think I’d deal Andrus for Halladay straight up.

He’d only be doing his due diligence by inquiring on Andrus, but asking for Andrus + Holland/Feliz is ridiculous.

That’d be a ridiculous haul. Just silly. I know we got Feliz and Andrus + others for Tex in a similar situation, but both Andrus and Feliz were very different players then. Andrus is an incredibly value commodity right now.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall. This was the largest auto I could afford. Should I therefore be made the subject of fun?

by thedirkatron on Jul 14, 2009 11:56 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Andrus doesn't get traded

unless a top, 3-4+ years of control, young established pitcher (along the lines of Lincecum) is coming back.

Needless to say, those types of pitchers don’t get traded either. So Andrus won’t get traded.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 14, 2009 12:08 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with all that

I’m just saying I’d ask if I were Ricciardi.

G G G E-flat_______ F F F D__________....

by t ball on Jul 14, 2009 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well, sure.

And if the Giants called I’d ask about Lincecum.

There’s asking about and then there’s asking for.

I think if he speaks with JD he’ll prolly ask about everyone, Hambone and Kinsler included. I can’t see him asking in any seriousness for a package of Andrus + Feliz/Holland. He’s not crazy.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall. This was the largest auto I could afford. Should I therefore be made the subject of fun?

by thedirkatron on Jul 14, 2009 2:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

You have to think that he really isn't all that anxious to trade him (Halladay)

I’d wager that he is only interested in seeing if someone is willing to overpay egregiously.

I'm Matt mutha-effing Bush, bitches, and mutha-eff East County.

"I'm as passionate and knowlegeable as any fan out there." Josey Wales

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2009 8:55 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

correct me if I'm wrong

but the only reason I’d want us to trade for Halladay is if we were “one player away.” Does Halladay make this team a serious contender for the WS? I certainly don’t think so and that’s the only reason why I’d trade away our future for a year and a half of him.

I've won the same lifetime achievement award twice....yes I'm the Most Interesting Man in the World

by Bezekira on Jul 14, 2009 11:40 AM CDT reply actions   0 recs

He doesn't even guarantee us a playoff spot this year

He makes us better no doubt but depending on who you give up you may not even make the playoffs with him this year. Next year is next year. he looks to make us better but alot can happen between now and then. Look at Atlanta and the Tex trade. He didn’t get them to the playoffs that first year and they weren’t going to go the next year so Atlanta was forced to trade him off and try and recoup some of what they lost to us.

Bryan Smith (12:17:17 PM PT): Justin Smoak and Josh Hamilton. The AL West might just have found their Bash Brothers, v. 2.0.

by bigsteve on Jul 14, 2009 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"trade away our future"

You have to define this term. Or you have to let Toronto define it for you.

Obviously there is a “trading away our future” that none of us would do (Smoak/Elvis + Feliz/Holland + Salty/Tea + basket of others)

And there is a “trading away our future” that I would do in a heartbeat (2 of Main/Beavan/Kiker/Ross + Davis + Vallejo/Lemon + basket of smaller others)

At some point, you have to color up your chips, turn your prospects into a real asset. Not all of Main/Beavan/Kiker/Ross/Feliz/Holland/Perez/Ramirez/Boscan/Purke/Scheppers/Wieland/many others I’m missing are going to be on the Rangers pitching staff in 4 years. Many will fail and likely some will have to be traded elsewhere. I guess holding on to all of them and being happy with what they turn out to be stars is one way of going about it. But the more realistic way is to hold onto the ones you have the most hope for and trade away the ones that you believe to be overvalued. Ideally you estimate that correctly. If Halladay can be had for 2-3 of the guys who you are less confident about long term (maybe Toronto is more confident about those particular players), then by all means, go for it.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 14, 2009 12:15 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Very well said.

"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008

by Rodney on Jul 14, 2009 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

some people worry that teams will ask more from us because of our depth

I see it the opposite way. All JD has to do is contact the Jays and let them know he is very interested, then let all other suitors make their offers, then decide if he wants to beat the best offer or not.

JD doesn’t have to let the Jays dictate what it will take, let the other offers dictate what it will take. If the Angels want Halladay, they can offer the jewels of there system and JD can still beat that offer if he so decides.

A deep system puts JD in the driver’s seat if he plays his cards right.

There's more to the picture than meets the eye.

by tricer on Jul 14, 2009 1:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Beat the best offer?

I’m not sure that’s how negotiating works. He’s most likely not going to know what the best offer is. Toronto is not going to say “here’s what other teams are offering.” Other teams aren’t going to tell him what they’re offering. How would he know what the best offer consists of?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2009 5:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Angels don't have much to work with

Any deal involving them is invariably going to involve guys like Napoli, Wood, Walden, Reckling, etc.

The Phillies or the Sox could offer more than the Angels without breaking a sweat.

by LiamP on Jul 14, 2009 6:01 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

dont hate on brandon wood

guy is going to be a good player, just needs to get out from under LAofAAAAA

hes better than any of the SS guys they are running out there now. hes going to be a (pretty much) lock to hit 20-25 HR/year, btw, the only SS to hit 23+ HR/year each of the last 3 years is one hanley ramirez.

all of that said, wood, reickling and idk who else would land halladay

wood, reickling, kendrick or sean rodriguez, arredondo, ??? — maybe would get it done if the Jays dont think they can get anything back, but i dont know if that trade makes sense from the angels standpoint as thats their (probable) top SP prospect, their longterm solution at 2b, a good 3b/ss guy and arredondo who has shown a lot of promise in the MLB pen

i just dont know if thats something that they would (could?) consider…

i dont see a package that the angels can offer UNLESS their owner agress to take wells (adding another OF to their already supercrowded OF mixture, and idk if there has ever been a more expensive OF than one of wells, torii hunter, vlad, GMJ with juan rivera as a 5th OF) — which i just dont think they will do

halladay, if traded (and its no more than 50/50 imho), would require more than that offer — if they would do something like the JBI offer above (2 of main/beavan/kiker/ross + davis + middle IF player (vallejo/lemon) + latin arm (non boscan category) i would jump all over it

say its even something like beavan, kiker or main, ross + davis + lemon + melo i dont know who would say no first to that offer…

that said, if its beavan/main, kiker, ross, davis, lemon, melo im doing that in a heartbeat.

but then again does beavan/main, kiker, ross, davis, lemon, melo beat out a kendrick, brandon wood, arredondo, reckling/walden, ???, raw arm offer?

Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.
-
"Call up Joaquin Arias? He had a legit spring training and seems to have cooled off a little bit in OKC but still a DH option. " -- kch tx

by knockoutking on Jul 14, 2009 12:38 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Trading for Halladay will not be worth it

If we have to give up any of Andrus/Smoak/Holland/Feliz/Perez., let alone a combination of 2 of those.

I know that Nolan/JD/Hicks will not include any of those players, but it would be make me a lot more comfortable if LSBers would stop discussing the notion as well.

We are in as good a position as you can be in baseball to begin building a dynasty. Making a huge trade just to get bumped early from the playoffs this year would be ridiculous and would contradict everything everyone said about this being the final rebuilding year, etc.

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2009 2:06 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Why anyone would assume a Rangers team with Halladay at the helm would just get bumped early in the playoffs is stupid to me.

Assuming Hamilton and Kinsler are anywhere close to “right” going into the series, why would you assume that the Rangers featuring Halladay at the front of their rotation would be an automatic bump in a 5 game series?

Cause they wouldn’t by a long shot.

The 40 Trumps All!!!

Everyone needs to drive a vehicle, even the very tall. This was the largest auto I could afford. Should I therefore be made the subject of fun?

by thedirkatron on Jul 14, 2009 2:09 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not automatic by any means

I didn’t say we would absolutely be bumped, but we have won only a single playoff game in history. I would love to get Halladay, but if we traded i.e. Smoak/Feliz for Halladay and we don’t get past the first round, or worst-case-scenario, he gets injured and/or we still miss the playoffs, then the trade could prove detrimental for our franchise.

The way I see it, we probably won’t resign him after the 1.5 years for 100M+. We give up ~ 6 yrs of Feliz AND Smoak for that? That would be idiotic, imho, when we are still in a great position to make the playoffs regardless, and build a ridiculously young and successful roster for cheap, giving us plenty of $ and player flexibility going into the future. Just my thoughts.

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2009 2:38 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

How is this relevant?
we have won only a single playoff game in history.

What difference will 1998 make if Halladay takes the mound in a playoff game for the Rangers in 2009?

by nivarsity on Jul 14, 2009 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Dumb

Halladay is probably the best pitcher in the AL, and definitely the best pitcher on a contending team. Having him in the Rangers rotation means that we have more than a puncher’s chance – especially in the best of 5 series.

I’m a white boy who doesn’t think a black man is good enough to manage my baseball team. - LSJ
"I really think that" - LSJ, on being asked by AirJordan

by FirebatM3 on Jul 14, 2009 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

More than a puncher's chance

Agreed. But Halladay, Millwood, Padilla v. CC, Burnett, Pettite/Joba would not exactly make the Rangers favorites. I would loathe to be in a position like Milwaukee where (in 1.5 yrs in this instance) it turns out that the trade was not worth it, when it did not put you over the top. I guess don’t have the confidence in Millwood and Padilla to show up when it counts like some people here do, i guess.

AND YOURE DUMB

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2009 2:44 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

you're

"He will not coddle them. Nolan Ryan doesn’t coddle." - Jeff Passan

by Dirk Diggler on Jul 14, 2009 2:45 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I lost my dumb a while back

"He will not coddle them. Nolan Ryan doesn’t coddle." - Jeff Passan

by Dirk Diggler on Jul 14, 2009 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

work gets in the way occasionally

"He will not coddle them. Nolan Ryan doesn’t coddle." - Jeff Passan

by Dirk Diggler on Jul 14, 2009 10:03 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

"a position like Milwaukee"

Actually, I’m pretty sure they’d go back and do the LaPorta for Sabathia trade all over again.

While it is easy for us uber-fans to stay committed to a team through a rebuilding effort, it isn’t that realistic a proposition for a club. They need playoff runs and playoff games to bring cash in – every additional ticket sold through September and into October is a huge marginal benefit to the club. That gives teams the type of financial flexibility that the Rangers desperately would benefit from right now.

Acquiring Sabathia put Milwaukee baseball back on the map. It gave the team national attention, and almost certainly boosted local attention and team revenues considerably. Yeah, they’d make that deal all over again. Even if LaPorta becomes a star.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 14, 2009 2:59 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No doubt.

Plus they got picks for Sabathia, and LaPorta isn’t guaranteed to be a star major leaguer. He hasn’t exactly raised his stock this year, fwiw.

by nivarsity on Jul 14, 2009 3:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

good points

use Atlanta as an example, then

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2009 4:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

It's a best of 5.

The Royals could beat the Yankees 1/4 of the time.

The 82-win Cardinals won three short series in 2006.

Complete crapshoot, anything can happen, and having a guy like Halladay (who could pitch about 17 innings in a five-game series) is an enormous asset.

by nivarsity on Jul 14, 2009 3:37 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Maybe I'm crazy

but I think, assuming the bats aren’t in a June Swoon type slump, that this team competes with anyone if it adds an ace and doesn’t subtract an impact starter from the roster.

It obviously depends, on whether this boom or bust offense is booming or busting.

"I saw a soldier try to dig a foxhole with his bare hands. He didn't notice that he'd torn off all his fingernails. I got him out of there quickly; not for his sake, but for ours. Fear is poison in combat...destructive, contagious." - Band of Brothers

by DJCahill on Jul 14, 2009 2:18 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Not just the offense

But whether the bullpen doesn’t regress to April-form and which Millwood and Padilla show up.

I am incredibly optimistic about the Rangers, but enough to potentially mortgage some of their future for a 32 yr old pitcher at this point.

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2009 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well,

I don’t think it will ever happen, because I don’t think Roy will void his no trade to come here.

However, I think we might be able to sacrifice a high end pitching prospect and not cripple our farm. If Roy agreed to the no-trade, which I doubt he would, we would just have to make a better package than the next team.

When you have Holland/Perez/Feliz/Beavan/Kiker/Main/Wieland/Font/Boscan/Schepper/Purke you obviously have some pitching prospects you can package for a pitcher for now and next year. We can’t possibly fit them all in, and not all can be fit into the rotation.

"I saw a soldier try to dig a foxhole with his bare hands. He didn't notice that he'd torn off all his fingernails. I got him out of there quickly; not for his sake, but for ours. Fear is poison in combat...destructive, contagious." - Band of Brothers

by DJCahill on Jul 14, 2009 3:07 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

????

This is a complete straw man argument. No one is suggesting that the Rangers should/would give up two of Andrus/Smoak/Holland/Feliz/Perez.

The beauty of this organization is that there are many valuable players that MAY be able to get the attention of the Jays. Maybe they ask for Feliz or Perez, at which point there will be some soul searching. But to dismiss the possibility out of hand is to just stick your head in the sand and be scared of making any moves for fear of them coming back to haunt you. If that is what you want to do, go be an Angels fan.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 14, 2009 2:41 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I hardly dismissed the opportunity completely

I’m all for acquiring Halladay. I suggested it in the off-season for (Davis, Salty, and Beavan, to which people scoffed at). I just don’t think it should be the players I listed above.

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2009 4:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Well that package won't get him

You have to give something to get something.

2009 Texas Rangers: Why The Hell Not Us?--ghtd36 on May 13, 2009

by boomer1 on Jul 14, 2009 5:11 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Boomer

You were one of the ones that said that package wasn’t worth it at the time if I remember correctly

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2009 6:16 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions   0 recs

I wonder

if the fact that we’re dealing with Riccardi have an impact on negotiations. If I remember correctly, JP was not a big fan of our boy JD.

I’m a white boy who doesn’t think a black man is good enough to manage my baseball team. - LSJ
"I really think that" - LSJ, on being asked by AirJordan

by FirebatM3 on Jul 14, 2009 2:14 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Did Jon reallly say that, AYFKM???

"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008

by Rodney on Jul 14, 2009 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

haha

selective editing

I’m a white boy who doesn’t think a black man is good enough to manage my baseball team. - LSJ
"I really think that" - LSJ, on being asked by AirJordan

by FirebatM3 on Jul 14, 2009 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Ah, gotcha.

Although we both know many here think that, I would be surpised for someone to eloquate such.

"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008

by Rodney on Jul 14, 2009 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Halladay should not be the AL starting pitcher.

Oh wait, this thread is about something else.

Wonderboy, what is the secret of your power? Wonderboy, won't you take me far away from the mucky-muck now. -- Tenacious D

by rooster on Jul 14, 2009 2:22 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

If the Angels get Halladay

they win the World Series.

by Clueless on Jul 14, 2009 3:23 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Tex isn't an Ace Pitcher

Big, big difference.
Add Halladay to the Angel staff, and they are gold.
At least, that’s how I’ll bet it.

by Clueless on Jul 14, 2009 6:22 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

halladay is an excellent player

but i don’t see how adding him guarantees them a ring.

my point is that last year before the deadline the angels had a team that many would have considered better than the team they have now. They added a premium offensive player who shored up their one real weakness, he played brilliantly, and they still got bounced early.

Adding Halladay makes them dangerous, and probably gives them the division. But it doesn’t ameliorate all their issues. They still have a shaky bullpen, they still have an offense that has outperformed and is just begging to start regressing to the mean (they lead the league in BABIP at .322), and they still have a certain Impaler who is neither capable of aping his former self nor capable of staying healthy. Far from what I would call a lock to win it all.

by Smoakin in the Boys Room on Jul 14, 2009 9:12 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Good points. Not a lock.

But if they get Halladay, that’s how I’m betting.

by Clueless on Jul 14, 2009 9:20 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

No one ever guarantees a ring

this isn’t basketball where one player can single-handedly change a series to being a lock.

All you can do is make the moves that give you a big increase in playoff probability or world series probability. Halladay represents that to both the Angels and the Rangers (since both are hovering between 30% and 50% playoff probability right now – there is a huge margin for improvement there)

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 15, 2009 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

to me halladay (if he goes to the rangers or angels)

would propel that team, if healthy, into the playoofs almost no matter what

bump texas or LAAofAAAAAs 5th best starter and add halladay is a HUGE difference if he pitches like he has the last few years

Scout: He was a first-round pick right? Got a huge bonus?
KG: Oh yeah.
Scout: Well, he spent a lot of it on milkshakes.
-
"Call up Joaquin Arias? He had a legit spring training and seems to have cooled off a little bit in OKC but still a DH option. " -- kch tx

by knockoutking on Jul 15, 2009 6:35 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

I agree.....

Halladay wins the West for either Texas or LAA…….I also think Halladay, Millwood, Padilla stack up pretty well in a short series……would TT, Crash, Kiker/Beavan do it?

by tklawless on Jul 16, 2009 3:32 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

The Rangers...

obviously have the pieces any team would want for a guy like Halladay.

It’s not going to happen though. The Rangers won’t take on his salary right now. Shitty.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jul 14, 2009 5:36 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

WTH wants Halladay? Not me!

Did you see him tonight? No thanks.

;)

"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW
"you gonna lose your horse. seriously." FX2
Yes we can! November 04, 2008

by Rodney on Jul 14, 2009 8:50 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Andrus_jersey2_small
Scheppers and Gutierrez - AFL Rising Stars Game

Recent FanPosts

Marion_small
NFL Week 11 GDT
Roger_the_alien_american_dad_small
Josh Johnson Available?
Ochomerun_small
Who is Josey Wales?
Marion_small
Mavs GDT 11/20/09
Ebbsfleet_united_logo_small
Three way deal only works if...
Small
OT: The global warming hoax exposed?
Img_0225_2_small
Pertinent Fangraphs Articles
Texas-rangers-logo-2_small
Frankie Piliere scouting for fans now
Img_0225_2_small
Rangers AFL Review
Whas_small
Per Jayson Stark - Rangers interested in Uggla

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris