Rangers re-sign Esteban German

why not.

The Rangers sold 360,000 Claw and Antlers T-Shirts. Amazing.

Tech got into some foul trouble and they missed those players in OT. 6th largest crowd in school history, too. Sweet game.

Andres Blanco on over to catcher or outfield now.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2010/11/justin-upton-rumors-wednesday.html?utm_medium=facebook&utm_source=twitterfeed

Anyone know what our Logan Morrisson/Ricky Nolasco equivalent would be?

So far, Torrealba said has heard from the Rockies, Mariners, Rangers and Red Sox.

Red Sox will not offer more than four years and $52 million for Adrian Beltre.

Cafardo adds that the Red Sox “appear to be on the same path” with Victor Martinez, as well. Both would be very solid offers, but with a competitive market for both players, especially Beltre, it might not be enough to keep them.

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2010/11/tigers-nearing-deal-with-joaquin-benoit.html

It’s a shame that bridge has been burned.

hairy
adjective
hairy

There are maybe more descriptors for various kinds of hair and hairiness than any other word-set in English, and some of them are extremely strange and fun. The more pedestrian terms like shaggy, unshorn, bushy, coiffed, and so on we’ll figure you already know.

The adjective barbigerous is an extremely uptown synonym for bearded.

Cirrose and cirrous, from the Latin cirrus meaning “curl” or “fringe” (as in cirrus clouds), can both be used to refer to somebody’s curly or tufty or wispy/feathery hair—Nicolas Cage’s hair in Adaptation is cirrose.

Crinite means “hairy or possessed of a hair-like appendage,” though it’s mainly a botanical term and would be a bit eccentric applied to a person. Crinose, however, is a people-adjective that means “having a lot of hair,” especially in the sense of one’s hair being really long. The related noun crinosity is antiquated but not obsolete and can be used to refer to somebody’s hair in an amusingly donnish way, as in Madonna’s normally platinum crinosity is now a maternal brown.

Glabrous, which is the loveliest of all hair-related adjectives, means having no hair (on a given part) at all. Please note that glabrous means more baby’s-bottom-hairless than bald or shaved, though if you wanted to describe a bald person in an ironically fancy way you could talk about his glabrous dome or something.

Hirsute is probably the most familiar upmarket synonym for hairy, totally at home in any kind of formal writing. Like that of many hair-related adjectives, hirsute’ s original use was in botany (where it means “covered with coarse or bristly hairs”), but in regular usage its definition is much more general. Not so with the noun hirsutism, though, which is still semi-medical and means having a truly pathological amount of hair and/or hair that’s unusually or unevenly distributed—the point is that the noun’s not really a synonym for hairiness.

Hispid means “covered with stiff or rough little hairs” and could apply to a military pate or unshaved jaw. Hispidulous is mainly just a puffed-up form of hispid and should be avoided.

Lanate and lanated mean “having or being composed of woolly hairs.” A prettier and slightly more familiar way to describe woolly hair is with the adjective flocculent. (There’s also floccose, but this is used mainly of odd little hairy fruits like kiwi and quince.)

Then there are the pil-based words, all derived from the Latin pilus (“hair”). Pilose, another fairly common adjective, means “covered with fine soft hair.” Deceptively similar-looking is pilous, which is a more hardcore-science adjective that the OED * defines as “characterized by or abounding in hair, hairy,” citing as an example the following (unexplained, thus kind of troubling) sentence: It is covered with a rough pilous epidermis. Pilous’ s own similarity to pileous is not deceptive, since the latter, a medical adjective, means “consisting of or pertaining to hair”; e.g., certain hair-intensive cancerous growths are classified as pileous tumors. On the other hand, pileous tumors are sometimes also called piliferous tumors, wherein the latter adjective means “having or producing hair” (in botany, piliferous means “tipped with a hair,” as in certain weird leaves). There’s also piligerous, which means “covered or clothed in hair” and is used primarily of animals, and piliated, which comes from the plural of pilus and is used to describe certain kinds of hairy or fringe-intensive bacteria. Last but not least is the noun pilimiction, which names a hopefully very rare medical disorder “in which piliform or hair-like bodies are passed in the urine.” Outside of maybe describing some kind of terribly excruciated facial expression as pilimictive, however, it’s hard to imagine a mainstream use for pilimiction.

(One pil-word N.B.: It so happens that the adjective pubescent literally means “covered with soft downy hairs,” so technically it qualifies as a synonym for pilose; but nowadays almost no reader will take pubescent this way, so I’d stick with pilose.)

Tomentose means “covered with dense little matted hairs”—baby chimps, hobbits’ feet, and Robin Williams are all tomentose.

Ulotrichous, which is properly classed with lannate and flocculent, is an old and extremely fancy term for “crisply woolly hair.” Be advised that it is also, if not exactly a racist adjective, certainly a racial one. A.C. Haddon’s Races of Man, from the early 1900s, famously classified races according to three basic hair types: leiotrichous (straight), cymotrichous (wavy), and ulotrichous.

Now go do the right thing.

*N.B. If you’re thinking of using any of the more esoteric adjectives here, you’d be well advised to keep an OED close at hand. This is not simply a gratuitous plug of another Oxford University Press product. The fact is that some of these hair-related terms aren’t in other dictionaries; plus, the terms are often specialized enough that you’re going to want not just an abstract definition but a couple sample sentences so that you can see how the words are actually used. Only the OED has both definitions and in-context samples for just about every significant word in the language. Actually, why not screw appearances and just state the obvious: No really serious writer should be without an OED, whether 20 volumes, a CD-ROM, or online. Nothing else comes close.

— DFW

(Which actually returns a result, thanks to wiktionary.)

Actually, I did read it. Not sure what I’m going to do with it, though.