Girls, Girls, Girls

For “There Will Be Blood” fanz

Blond or brunette? Brunette

Favorite news anchor? Robin Meade I guess….I don’t watch news, I read it you neanderthal.

Favorite athlete? several…I"ll go with Anna Rawson or Lindsey Vonn

Politician? pass

Who do you like that everyone thinks your crazy? LBoH
Overrated? Tons

Athletic or curvy? Athletic blonds or curvy brunettes

Good choice.

Brazillian football-ball star Laisa Andrioli.

You’re welcome.

I used to have a weird crush on Linda Cohn.

/thread ruined

And as you well know I can barely focus on on one thing at a time. So between mowing the law and football…..I choose football.

Sorry Robert.

5 Dollars doesn’t buy my undivided attention.

that was one of my childhood crushes, and damn, she just got hotter

when I was younger. she did a sports illustrated swimsuit edition that I thoroughly enjoyed

See if I can kickstart it:

You guys all know who my current favorite is, I think. I ran across her watching reruns of Chuck season 2 in January. I’m not sure quite what it is, but there’s something particularly sensual about her, or at least about her acting that had me ready to join FULCRUM for Dr. Jill Roberts. There’s a Secret Sauce of sorts you have to have to be my #1, and Jordana’s got it (although that’s a terrible, wide-open-for-a-pun way to phrase that sentiment).

I don’t know that I currently have an all-time favorite, but if I ever do I’m fairly sure it’ll be Kate Beckinsale. Which is somewhat odd in a way, because I doubt she’s ever actually going to be my #1 (never know, but she’s currently #2 and none of my #2’s have ever moved up that final rung) – but if I was going to hand out a title for most beautiful woman in the world, she’d be the one I’d give it to.

Three of my four “#1’s” have at least come off a TV show in a roundabout fashion, but when I was a kid, the first one was Bonnie Barstow, K.I.T.T.‘s mechanic on Knight Rider (played by Patricia McPherson). No, I’m not that old but I pretty much grew up on 80’s reruns. Catching Knight Rider on channel 56 at 4 or 5 PM was literally a daily ritual for awhile when I was about 11-12. And it was pretty much exclusively about her, because even 11 y/o me was smart enough to hate the Hoff with a passion.

I don’t know that have a conscious preference in hair color, it usually depends entirely on the chick, and what her look is – but I have a long history with brunettes, it seems, so that’s probably my subconscious preference.

Overrated babes: I could do a laundry list here if I really tried. But off the top of my head… Kim Kardashian, Megan Fox, Katy Perry and ScarJo are probably the most overrated in my estimation. Taylor Swift. Hayden Panettiere. Jessica Biel, although she’s grown on me a tad recently. Natalie Portman gets at least an honorable mention under this category. Emma Watson too, at least until her hair grows back. I don’t necessarily know that Anne Hathaway is overrated, but I put her here too, because Anne Hathaway is weird. Features are too big for her face.

Since I know people will hate me for that list, I’ll offset it by running off some of my favorite underrated babes: Odette Yustman. Tabrett Bethell. Navi Rawat. Katrina Law. Anna Kendrick. Italia Ricci. Nina Dobrev. Sprague Grayden. Leah Cairns. Julie McNiven. Again, I could probably go on if I tried.

I know she is crazy, but I think she is hot.

Blast from the past!

Leo Dicaprio is one lucky motherfucker.

I am a collector of celeb photos with thousands of pics in my collection. The rest of my humble current top ten includes: Anne Hathaway (love pale skin), Hayden Panetierre, Jessica Biel (best ass on the planet), Kate Mara (love redheads), Kim Smith (especially since she went to Odessa Permian like me), Kristen Bell, Marisa Miller (love those curves), Olivia Wilde, and Scarlett Johansson.

Elisha Cuthbert

Anybody that’s accused of kicking Axl Rose’s ass…

Amazing in Scent of a Woman

$5,000 to the man that ends Seal

Athlete: Brianna Glenn

All time favorite: Stacey Dash

I know dark chocolate is supposed to be better for me, but I just can’t say no to milk chocolate.

someone else I dig quite a bit is Amy Mainzer, an astrophysicist that does a lot of different documentaries on Discovery Science channel.

I have not seen one photo of any girl in this post that ISN’T hotter than Erin Andrews. How’s that?

Rachel Bilson

And wow, I had totally forgotten just how much I am in love with Odette Yustman.

Paraguayan javelin thrower Leryn Franco:

Not my favorite, but not bad. Also, I assume it’s difficult to throw a javelin in heels.

So I’ll be the nerd who throws out the movie stars from the olden times. Ingrid Bergman has always been my gal of choice, frankly. And that accent…

However, I’d be remissed if I didn’t mention Audrey Hepburn- recently watched a three hour movie about a nun solely because she was the star. The definition of classy, in my mind.

As for less famous ladies who I only remember seeing in one movie, I’ll acknowledge Alida Valli (The Third Man- great movie), Linda Harrison (Planet of the Apes), Cathy O’Donnell (Ben-Hur), and Claudia Cardinale (Once Upon a Time in the West- looking at other pictures of her, that may have been the only place she truly looked great, but boy did she). The list could go on and on.

at the low number of pics in this thread.

Blake Lively has an 80 leg tool.

So who do you think has an 80 in the other tool categories? Discuss.

The reason I haven’t been involved in this thread, which you would think I’d be all over, is that I can’t open this particular thread at work.

And I know that once I dive in, there’s no turning back.

What’s the best you’ve ever seen one of your favorites (or just any woman in general, if you like) look in a non-photoshoot setting? Like at a premiere, in a movie TV/show or onstage, candids, that sort of thing.

For example: Jordana at the DEBS LA premiere in ’05 (although I should probably be posting the Rio candids from last week, in her case)

1 2

Kate on with The Chin in ’08:

1 2

Kristen Bell on Ferguson in ’08:

1 2

But basically, I’m linking what I perceive as important female physical tools (again, matter of subjectivity) to the five traditional baseball “scout” tools (i.e. average, power, speed, arm, glove). Of course, there are countless other things which I suppose you could link to various baseball skills, but I can’t be bothered to account for that.

The way it works is: the average female, with mostly “average” tools: lurking between 40-50 (somewhere between below-average and barely major-league average), can be considered the equivalent of a replacement player/organizational fodder. Below-average feminine tools (could be anything: horse-face, saggy breasts, emaciation) are essentially the type of baseball tools which are pretty much the butt of jokes: scoring somewhere around 20 to 40 – i.e. Bengie Molina’s speed tool, Johnny Damon’s arm tool, Juan Pierre’s power, Michael Young’s glove (fuck yeah, shoehorn!), Joaquin Arias’ everything tool. It’s a not so cultivated process, but it’s the general premise I’ll go by, and then modify as I move along. So here goes:

Face -———→ Glove

Rationale: I’d argue that girls with pretty faces, who are unspectacular elsewhere are going to get plenty of looks about the place, but they’re probably never going to be crazily coveted. Likewise, there are tons of utility infielders who exist on rosters essentially for their defensive abilities. At the other end of the scale, things are weirder since plenty of shitty fielders make their rounds, but I’d argue unattractive-faced girls wouldn’t get that sort of coverage.

Body -————> Hitting

Rationale: Both isolated and connected to the fielding tool above. I’m not specifying specific parts of the body; more like general body shape, curves, etc. I guess this includes stomach and ass, but I’m isolating leg and cleavage as individual tools. I figure that a baseball player who can field the ball well and hit for average, is pretty much guaranteed an everyday playing spot, even if other tools are merely mediocre. That’s how I perceive it to be with women: a good-looking girl, face and body-wise, in my opinion, are pretty good finds, even if their remaining tools don’t really stand out among the rest.

Cleavage -———→ Power

Rationale: I don’t really know what a 40-50 power tool (which I give as "average) means, but I assume it’s, what, 5-10 homers a season? You can get by with that, just like I don’t think most people would mind a girl not having a huge chest if elsewhere things are accounted for. However, having 30-40 HR power is a great bonus and probably does elevate someone from merely ‘good’ to an MVP candidate; but in my opinion, it’s not at the top of a priority list. Juan Pierre power is pretty rare, and I don’t think you’d deal with it too often, so it’s not a big issue.

Legs -———→ Throwing Arm

Rationale: This is where things start getting confusing for me to rationalize. It’s an excellent tool to possess, but I don’t think it’s really that noticeable unless it’s at one of the ends of the scale. I’d assume a majority of players would at least have a 40-50 arm (and nobody is going to highlight such a rating), with only a few who throw like girls, and a decent, but not significant number who are capable of throwing a man out from second on a basehit to the outfield.

But basically, I’m linking what I perceive as important female physical tools (again, matter of subjectivity) to the five traditional baseball “scout” tools (i.e. average, power, speed, arm, glove). Of course, there are countless other things which I suppose you could link to various baseball skills, but I can’t be bothered to account for that.

The way it works is: the average female, with mostly “average” tools: lurking between 40-50 (somewhere between below-average and barely major-league average), can be considered the equivalent of a replacement player/organizational fodder. Below-average feminine tools (could be anything: horse-face, saggy breasts, emaciation) are essentially the type of baseball tools which are pretty much the butt of jokes: scoring somewhere around 20 to 40 – i.e. Bengie Molina’s speed tool, Johnny Damon’s arm tool, Juan Pierre’s power, Michael Young’s glove (fuck yeah, shoehorn!), Joaquin Arias’ everything tool. It’s a not so cultivated process, but it’s the general premise I’ll go by, and then modify as I move along. So here goes:

Face -———→ Glove

Rationale: I’d argue that girls with pretty faces, who are unspectacular elsewhere are going to get plenty of looks about the place, but they’re probably never going to be crazily coveted. Likewise, there are tons of utility infielders who exist on rosters essentially for their defensive abilities. At the other end of the scale, things are weirder since plenty of shitty fielders make their rounds, but I’d argue unattractive-faced girls wouldn’t get that sort of coverage.

Body -————> Hitting

Rationale: Both isolated and connected to the fielding tool above. I’m not specifying specific parts of the body; more like general body shape, curves, etc. I guess this includes stomach and ass, but I’m isolating leg and cleavage as individual tools. I figure that a baseball player who can field the ball well and hit for average, is pretty much guaranteed an everyday playing spot, even if other tools are merely mediocre. That’s how I perceive it to be with women: a good-looking girl, face and body-wise, in my opinion, are pretty good finds, even if their remaining tools don’t really stand out among the rest.

Cleavage -———→ Power

Rationale: I don’t really know what a 40-50 power tool (which I give as "average) means, but I assume it’s, what, 5-10 homers a season? You can get by with that, just like I don’t think most people would mind a girl not having a huge chest if elsewhere things are accounted for. Having 30-40 HR power is a great bonus and probably the majoring factor in turning someone from good to an MVP candidate, in both circles of thought, but in my opinion, it’s not at the top of a priority list. Juan Pierre power is pretty rare, and I don’t think you’d deal with it too often.

“Sum of Parts” -———→ Speed

Rationale: So yeah, I really was scraping at the bottom of the barrel for this last bit. It’s something I can’t designate, but it always seems to me that some girls just look better than what you’d assume them to be, after having rated their individual tools in isolated form. Usually that’s not the case, but when that happens, you’re not going to discriminate against someone for that. I’d assume even a typical ‘replacement’ player would have decent speed. Fast guys who can’t do much of anything else may get shots on rosters as designated pinch-runners or late game defensive replacements – I’d say a girl who is “deceptively good-looking” gets the same treatment. On the other hand, only a few players are actually slower than ass, i.e. Bengie Molina, but as long as other things hold up in some form, they tend to still get to play in the bigs. But sometimes, the absolute lack of speed could be a turn-off, but usually it isn’t a killer.

…

I think I’m done here. Now you can hurl abuse at my poorly thought-out arguments! I guess it’s still a matter of how one personally prioritizes each tool.

She’s apparently the next big thing as far as VS goes.

Emmy Rossum:

Renee Olstead:

Elena Anaya:

Amy Adams:

Since we have quite a few Emma Watson fans on the board.

http://www.starpulse.com/news/index.php/2010/11/12/emma_watson_wows_in_a_see_through_dres

Sophia Bush

Alison Brie

Freida Pinto

Olivia Munn

Marisa Miller

Evangeline Lilly

Hilary Swank