Make no bones about it, I want to debate Greinke and Garza to take place after Cliff Lee is signed as a Texas Ranger.  In Adam's poll I voted yes for Cliff Lee at 6 years and $140 million.  Do I think that is steep?  Yes.  Do I think the Rangers need to win this one?  Yes.  However, I am on the bandwagon to sign Lee and make a play for Greinke or Garza.  Greinke has been debated to death.  How much will he cost, who will he cost to get him, etc., etc.  Lone Star Ball has pretty much covered every way we could aquire Zack Greinke.  I want to explore the cost of Greinke vs. Garza after we sign Cliff Lee.  Rotations could be:  Lee, Greinke, Wilson, Lewis, Hunter or Lee, Wilson, Lewis, Garza, Holland (Rotations not set in stone, just guessing).  I figure Greinke cost us Holland and Garza does not.  I do not want to lose Martin Perez, but I like Holland better and have stated that many times.  I am not convinced that Garza cost us Holland or Perez.  I think we could make a package for Garza without either of those two and I could be wrong on that. 

Who would you rather go after given the cost, Greinke or Garza?  Cost being prospects and contract?