Looking Back at 2007 Draft, How the AL West Fared
Sunday, February 14, 2010 at 11:13PM
I was checking out the top 100 list from Keith Law of ESPN Insider and reading about Jason Heyward of the Braves ranked #1(Keith Law, formerly the special assistant to the general manager for the Toronto Blue Jays, is the senior baseball analyst for Scouts Inc.).
Law was rambling on about him being a can't miss prospect and he might be in right field for the Braves this year. It suddenly hit me that the Braves certainly did not draft 1st in that 2007 draft, so I wondered who all overlooked him and chose someone else. Of course I was hoping the Rangers hadn't taken Blake Beavan, their #1 choice in 2007 before Heyward.
Well, it turns out Heyward went #14 that year, and Beavan was taken at at #17. Other notables, David Price already with the Rays went #1, and Matt Weiters at Baltimore is for sure all ready up was taken #5. Heyward should make the Braves' team this year.
Beavan could make it this year, but several things would have to occur, none of which would be good for the Rangers. Look for him in 2011 or '12, or be in a trade for another player the Rangers might need. It's fun to look back a wonder what could or should have been. Like, I wonder if the Mariners are having second thoughts about Phillippe Aumont, Ecole secondaire du Versant Gatineau, Quebec, at #11, or the Indians about Beau Mills Lewis-Clark State at #13 just before the Braves?
Texas was not looking for position players (remember they had committed to building up the pitching), so who's to say (other than Jon Daniels) that Texas would have taken Heyward, even if he had been available. Heyward is looking to break in with Atlanta this year, but Texas' draftees from that draft that are already with the club include Tommy Hunter (#54) and Julio Borbon (at #37).
Law rated Texas' first round that year as #1.
" The board played into Texas' hands a bit; the Rangers were primed to take some power arms, and ended up with two of the best, Blake Beavan at No. 17 and the somewhat underrated Michael Main at No. 24, a guy I thought could go in the top dozen picks but who slipped because of a poor performance in the state tournament in Florida. They got good value in Julio Borbon at No. 35, since several teams were on him in the first round and he's likely to perform well in the low minors. Tommy Hunter at No. 54 gives them a quick-to-the-majors power set-up guy if they choose to leave him in the pen (which I think is his best role – he has has a reliever's body and a reliever's repertoire). And they took a nice gamble on John Gast, who needs Tommy John surgery but would otherwise have been a top-100 player, in the fifth round."
Oakland's first round was rated #4 by Law, but none of the below prospects show up on their 40-man roster..
"Oakland did the best of the teams that focused on probability over upside. Reliever Sam Demel is a great value in the late third round, and he and fifth-rounder Andrew Carignan should get to the high minors fairly quickly. They got a strike thrower in the first round with James Simmons, who should also get to the majors soon but doesn't project as more than a fourth starter. Second-rounder Grant Desme was a small bargain who slipped because of the wrist injury that ended his season early, and I'm a big fan of Oakland's other second-rounder, UNC shortstop Josh Horton, who does everything in an unorthodox way but could be an offensive shortstop who plays average defense."
Best guys who slipped
1. Rick Porcello, to Detroit at No. 27: Top-five talent slips because of big bonus demands. While Detroit – as predicted – will have to go over slot to sign him, the Tigers have done so several times in the last few years, nearly always with great results.
2. Andrew Brackman to the Yankees at No. 30: Big risk here, since he was off all spring and may have an elbow injury, but the reward here is huge – a 6-foot-10 power right-hander who has shown good command in the past and gets great downhill plane on his fastball.
3. Matt Harvey to the Angels in the third round: Angels director of scouting Eddie Bane may have found another Nick Adenhart, whom the Angels selected in the 14th round of the 2004 draft. Harvey doesn't have Adenhart's stuff, but he's got a solid-average fastball that touches 93 mph, a plus curve and a good pitchers' build; on talent, he should have gone in the last half of the first round.
The full list is below.
2007 MLB First-Round Draft Order
|
PICK |
TEAM |
PLAYER |
POS |
|
1. |
Devil Rays |
David Price |
LHP |
|
2. |
Mike Moustakas |
SS |
|
|
3. |
Josh Vitters |
3B |
|
|
4. |
Daniel Moskos |
LHP |
|
|
5. |
Matt Wieters |
C |
|
|
6. |
Ross Detwiler |
LHP |
|
|
7. |
Matt LaPorta |
1B |
|
|
8. |
Casey Weathers |
RHP |
|
|
9. |
D-Backs |
Jarrod Parker |
RHP |
|
10. |
Madison Bumgarner |
LHP |
|
|
11. |
Mariners |
Phillippe Aumont |
RHP |
|
12. |
Matt Dominguez |
3B |
|
|
13. |
Indians |
Beau Mills |
3B |
|
14. |
Braves |
Jason Heyward |
CF |
|
15. |
Devin Mesoraco |
C |
|
|
16. |
Blue Jays |
Kevin Ahrens |
3B |
|
17. |
Rangers |
Blake Beavan |
RHP |
|
18. |
Peter Kozma |
SS |
|
|
19. |
Joe Savery |
LHP |
|
|
20. |
Chris Withrow |
RHP |
|
|
21. |
Blue Jays |
J.P. Arencibia |
C |
|
22. |
Giants |
Tim Alderson |
RHP |
|
23. |
Nick Schmidt |
LHP |
|
|
24. |
Rangers |
Michael Main |
RHP |
|
25. |
Aaron Poreda |
LHP |
|
|
26. |
James Simmons |
RHP |
|
|
27. |
Tigers |
Rick Porcello |
RHP |
|
28. |
Ben Revere |
CF |
|
|
29. |
Giants |
Wendell Fairley |
RF |
|
30. |
Yankees |
Andrew Brackman |
RHP |
19 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
good post
enjoyed that, thx
BTW, just read that Jair Jurrjens is going to have an MRI taken on his sore shoulder. Gulp – Atlanta’s a little worried. If the news is bad do you think they’d be interested in BMac? They got anything we can use? BMac, Font and Smoak for Heyward maybe? heh
Rangers pitchers and catchers are scheduled to report on Thursday, February 18.
I'd do that
I’d give Smoak for Heyward for sure. Heyward is much more athletic. Braves wouldn’t do it, though.
TexasSummerHeat
by TexasSummerHeat on Feb 16, 2010 1:29 PM CST up reply actions
Thanks for the read Heat.
"Sometimes you just want to sit back and watch somebody throw 100." - Jeff Passan on Neftali Feliz
"Baseball's all that's real" - JB
by Cecilio's Guante on Feb 16, 2010 8:33 AM CST reply actions
I don't think you can really fault Beavan for not being in the majors yet
of the guys on that list who’ve already made it, most were college players (i.e., Price, Wieters). Obviously the Rangers should have taken Porcello, but probably should have 25 other clubs.
Also, if the Rangers take Porcello, they definitely don’t get Borbon (another guy who got a major league deal). Yeah, you’d rather have Porcello. But it isn’t as cut and dry as it could have been.
Go Rice Owls!
Can't Fault Beavan
I wasn’t faulting him. Sorry if it looked that way, but I was trying to point out that the Rangers have several that have made it or are as near as the Braves Heyward.
TexasSummerHeat
by TexasSummerHeat on Feb 16, 2010 1:36 PM CST up reply actions
Not to be picky...
..but shouldn’t that be fared?
If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.
Faired vs Fared
Not according to my dictionary.
Fare = a fee to ride a bus or a train
Fair = objective, impartial look, etc.
TexasSummerHeat
by TexasSummerHeat on Feb 16, 2010 1:34 PM CST up reply actions
your dictionary is wrong
http://encarta.msn.com/dictionary_/FAIR.html
fair or fare? Do not confuse the spelling of fair and fare, which sound similar. Fair is chiefly used as an adjective and has many meanings, including “reasonable and just,” “light in color,” and “moderately good,” as in fair treatment, fair hair, fair weather. Fair is also used as a noun, denoting an outdoor entertainment or a commercial exhibition. The noun fare, on the other hand, means “cost of travel,” “food,” or “entertainment,” as in fare-paying passengers, good wholesome fare, dull fare for viewers. Fare is also used as a verb, meaning “get on in a particular way”: How did she fare in the exam?
Go Rice Owls!
You are correct
It’s “fared,” if you’re referring to how someone did.
I’d also like to clear up something I see a lot around here. Not in this thread, necessarily, just in general. “Dominate” is a verb, as in “The Rangers dominated the Mariners last night.”
“Dominant” is the adjective, as in “Neftali Feliz will be the most dominant pitcher in the AL over the next 10 years.”
The two words are not interchangeable, though they are related.
And that’s today’s lesson from Grammar Nazi Hauptsturmführer Rob Cook…
"Jesus, Spanish- our jobs aren't enough, now you want our words?"
-- Sterling Archer
people mix up dominate and dominant?
that has to be just lazy.
If you went after all the lazy grammar around here you’d go crazy. The they’re/their/there’s alone would drive you nuts.
Go Rice Owls!
Yeah
I see that all the time, not just here, but on other boards I frequent.
I really try hard not to play grammar Nazi, but between being a writer (and formerly an editor) and getting a minor in English in college, it’s really hard sometimes.
"Jesus, Spanish- our jobs aren't enough, now you want our words?"
-- Sterling Archer
Nice and humble.
'Waiting for a girl and she gets me into fights
Waiting for a girl we get drunk on Friday night'
I don't understand how that bolsters your conclusion
"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34
Neftali Feliz says sit your 5 dollar ass down before he makes change...
by Brian Thomas on Feb 17, 2010 8:08 PM CST up reply actions
Sorry, now I see am piling on
Note to self: check for prior replies before commenting…
"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34
Neftali Feliz says sit your 5 dollar ass down before he makes change...
by Brian Thomas on Feb 17, 2010 8:11 PM CST up reply actions
Correction will be made, thanks.
It will be corrected, but the point was deeper than this words’ meaning. Still, an editor has to point this out and I understand that. Alas, when I’m posting on a blog it is many times Hurry, hurry, hurry and go back and correct later.
TexasSummerHeat
by TexasSummerHeat on Feb 16, 2010 3:55 PM CST reply actions
I know the difference between there/their/they're
but every now and then I use the wrong one and I always preview. Then I read it and think ‘doh.’

Texas Summer Heat


















