Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Indy 500: Coverage of the 'Greatest Spectacle In Racing'

The Rangers, Small Sample Sizes and You

I mentioned some information about sample sizes in an Elvis conversation a while ago, but I wanted to take a look at some of the peripherals on the team which have already hit or are close to hitting the point of reliability on the season.

For reference, go here for a list of when rates tend to stabilize and go here for the nitty gritty explanation.

Star-divide

POSITION PLAYERS

I'm mostly doing this because, at some point while I was gone, most of the starters hit the stabilizing point for contact rate, which is ~100 PA. Four more players will probably be hitting the stability point for strike out rate, line drive rate and pitches seen per plate appearance over the next week (~150 PA). So I'll be concentrating on these.

Michael Young (144 PA): MY, as usual, is getting the most plate appearances, and is already pretty close to 150. There is some cause for concern with him, though less than there was earlier in the year and there's not yet reason for panic. His 79.8% contact rate is the lowest of his career, but less than a full percentage point behind last season. And he was good last season. His K% is also right in line with his last few years. His LD% is also the lowest of his career, though not too far behind his last couple years. As far as getting to pitches, putting them in play and hitting them hard, MY is about who he's been recently. As has been pointed out by others, the big changes are a lot more ground balls, a lot fewer fly balls and a HR/FB rate that is not far from '07 and '08 but pretty far below '09. He's around 50+ PA from GB% stabilizing, about 100+ from FB% stabilizing and about 150+ from his HR/FB rate becoming reliable. Another big difference is his awfully low BABIP, which, if he's hitting the same otherwise, is probably largely bad luck. That .312 wOBA is pretty sad, but he's gotten back to what we'd expect in some areas, and in the rest he's got plenty of time to still get there. It's doubtful MY will repeat last season, but I'll bet he's still able to get to the two seasons prior, and that's probably what we should have expected this year, anyway.

Josh Hamilton (133 PA): Josh is actually not making better contact than he has in the past, and his 70.7% rate is the worst of his career. But, he's swinging less often and his 23.3% line drive rate is the best he's ever put up. It may surprise you to know, but his 24.4% strike out rate is also the worst of his career so far. He's also walking the most he has in his career, and while these all seem like small differences from last year when you look at them individually, the total package of being a little more selective, hitting the ball a little harder and working walks a little more often combine as a big difference, namely a jump from a .321 wOBA in 2009 to a .371 in 2010. There are still some concerns that this may be smoke and mirrors, but there's also at least as much reason to hope this improved approach will lead to even more improvement as other samples become more stable.

Elvis Andrus (131 PA): Considerable time has already been spent discussing Elvis's improved approach. His contact rate at one point was far below last season's 87.3%, but it climbed over the course of his first 100 PAs and now sits at 84.7%. His line drive rate (25.7%, 15th in baseball) has climbed up almost 4% from last season. He's 22nd in the AL seeing 4.07 P/PA. In short, he's become dramatically more selective and he's hitting the ball harder. We all know this from watching, but isn't it a nice feeling to read it put down as hard evidence? Now what's most fascinating is the walk rate. All year, most of us have been saying "of course, the walks will come down." But, they've actually gone up, and he's a third of the way from that walk rate being stable. That's a 16% walk rate, by the way; 15th in all of baseball. It's quickly getting closer and closer to the point where you can comfortably call Elvis one of the most patient hitters in baseball and stop chalking a bunch of it up to SSS. He is a bad, bad man. His in-season ZiPS projection, by the way, puts him at a .362 OBP with 62 walks at season's end. In case you've forgotten, this is a 21 year old shortstop with elite defensive skills.

Vladimir Guerrero (128 PA): I think Vlad's LD% is the most interesting. Again, this is pretty close to the point of stability, and he's hitting them 21.3% of the time. That's sizably better than all but his first full season in the Majors (which still falls just short). It's just one measure of power, but it does suggest he hasn't lost his power, like we worried earlier in the year. The contact rate is right in line with his career; in fact, currently, exactly the same as last season. The K rate is also the lowest of his career thus far. The BABIP isn't too high for him, and some of this is obviously the ballpark, but, right now, Vlad is putting up a .390 wOBA. That's just below his career rate and his best in three years. There's good reason right now to think Vlad is not merely going to be an improvement at DH and an improvement over his last season, but rather the elite-caliber hitter he has been for most of his career. This is an admittedly cursory glance, but I'm not seeing anything right now that jumps out as unsustainable, everything is right in line with his career and/or not really attributable to SSS.

Ian Kinsler (44 PA): I mention Kinsler just because of his swing rate. He's swinging at 36.2% of the pitches he's seen so far. That's a peripheral that tends to stabilize at only 50 PAs. This is nearly 9% better than his career rate, nearly 10% better than last season and the lowest rate of his career by far. Is Ian planning on being a lot more patient this season?

Julio Borbon (101 PA): The only other Ranger over 100 PAs is Julio Borbon, so that's the last player who's hit a benchmark beyond swing rate. Borbon's 83.4% contact rate is down from last year a bit, though still above average. of course, getting wood on the ball isn't the concern with him. Similarly, his 15.5% K rate is good, though a couple weeks or so from being reliable. The issue is that he is not hitting the ball with authority. Yes, he's also been extremely unlucky, he's certainly better than a .244 BABIP, but he wouldn't be doing too well even with neutral luck, probably. His (park-adjusted) wOBAr is just .245, only about 20 points better than what he's actually putting up and still very, very bad. His 13.2% line drive rate is bad, down more than 5% from last year, and it's getting very close to the point where you don't have much hope for that to improve over more time in the Majors. The walk rate is at a putrid 1% and half way to stabilizing, but I don't think, with options, I'd give him time to bring that up if the line drive rates don't improve. Unlike some, I'm not ready to sell Borbon's chances of being an average MLB center fielder in the future, but it's pretty close to the point where they've got to look elsewhere for help this season and have Julio work on his future at an easier level. And if the Rangers decide that point is tomorrow, there probably shouldn't be any outcry. I haven't been keeping track, but when is Endy Chavez supposed to be ready?

Nelson Cruz (74 PA): It's kind of sad Cruz has missed so much time for the sake of this post. There is some interesting stuff going on with him. To start, Cruz does not make contact well. His 71.7% rate is 14th worst in baseball with 70+ PAs, and pretty close to his career rate (though slightly better than last season). But he also just doesn't swing much. His ability to lay off on pitches out the zone was talked about last year, and it's been even better this season (and, again, swing rates stabilize around 50 PAs, so Nellie is past that point). He only swings at 20.4% of pitches out the zone, which is one of the better rates in baseball 7% better than average and more than 7% better than last season. He doesn't swing often in the zone, either. Nellie doesn't seem to have great contact skills but good patience and plate discipline; he waits for something he can hit and uses his immense power to make something of it, or he just takes a walk. It's a skill set I'm very much in love with. I think it may also explain some of why he's been a late bloomer on the MLB level. His line drive rate is higher than last season and a ways from stabilizing, and his HR/FB rate even more so, but, really, if he comes back healthy, Nellie can regress quite a bit and still be an MVP candidate. What he was doing before the injury was nutty, and sustaining it would have been the best season in MLB history. We can be certain he won't do that, but we can be certain (unless he loses something to injury) that he's shown plenty of the skills that could make him one of the best player's this year.

Matt Treanor (71 PA): Not much to say about Treanor, but so far, his peripherals are regressing pretty reliably to where he's been over his career. His BABIP has been a bit low, so you can probably expect him to get back near his career .283 wOBA. Which is nothing special, but it's better than we thought we were getting at catcher before he started playing.

Justin Smoak (66 PA): Smoak has been swinging at 41% of the pitches he sees, which is lower than average. Shocking, but he's patient. As an interesting aside, the 27.2% of the pitches he swings at out of the zone is exactly average. Do you know what his wOBAr (expected wOBA) has been so far this year? .396. He's been absurdly unlucky so far. Do not allow those slash stats to curb your enthusiasm (yet) folks.

 

PITCHERS

Pitching stabilizes at higher totals than hitting. K/PA rates, GB rates and LD rates all hit reliability ~150 batters faced. FB and GB/FB rates stabilize at about 200. Nothing else stabilizes for another 300 BF. So, in other words, pitching performance is a small sample size for a while, and (quality) scouting and past performances carry a lot more weight in future expectations for most of the season.

I'm looking at K/9 rates because K/PA isn't available at FanGraphs, and it seems to be those should roughly normalize at the same point, right?

C.J. Wilson (170 BF): This is the exciting one. Ceej's K/9 of 6.26 is actually below average (that, of course, includes relievers), is near the bottom among AL starters who have pitched at least 40 innings, and is actually below what I expected coming in to the year. His 16% LD% is among the best in baseball, as is his (11th best) 55.5% ground ball rate, so there's really a good chance he'll keep his BABIP lower than average, but it's not going to stay at .259 and he's not striking guys out at a high rate. Of course, he's also not walking anyone and has not yet allowed a home run. There's some cause for concern, and there's plenty of time for the BB and HR rates to absolutely bomb, but, at the same time, even some regression won't necessarily make him a sucky pitcher. Ceej probably isn't nearly as good a starter as his shiny ERA suggests, but he's still pitching better than I expected and there's no reason to think he can't continue to be a solid member of the rotation.

Scott Feldman (170 BF): Feldman's strike out rate this year has been about the same, so that's not the issue (of course, it wasn't very good to being with). He's actually allowing fewer line drives, dropping from 20.5% to 17.8%, so that's not the problem. It's that he's getting ground balls 8% less often, though he's still among the best in the AL there. Worse, his FB% (about 30 BF from stabilizing) has jumped more than 10%. I really don't know at want point you stop expecting Feldman to turn it around, but there's not much reason to expect Feldman's going to get the ball on the ground any more often than he has been, and when he doesn't strike people out, that's an issue. The walks have a chance to come down, and the BABIP probably won't stay at .332, so the ERA will probably get better, and his FIP is only at 4.60 (4.31 last year), but he's probably not going to come close to reproducing his face-value stats this year.

Rich Harden (161 BF): I'm not sure we need to be worrying about Harden as much as we had been. Though the velocity is down, there's still time for improvement. That 6.31 BB% is way out of whack from his career and far from the stabilizing point. His K rate is one of the best in baseball and not too far from most of his AL career. His LD% is way down and his GB% isn't too far from his last few seasons. Unfortunately the fly ball rate is way up, which sucks for Arlington. I'm really not sure what to make of him, and the scouting information on his stuff will tell you a lot more than this, but I do think there's room for him to be at least an average pitcher.

Colby Lewis (159 BF): Colby's striking out 10.24 batters for every nine innings. That's the 6th best in baseball, within a strike of third place, and about what you can probably expect him to do this year. That's, just. . . so awesome. He's got a 16.5 LD% and a 40.2 GB%. Those are both good, and he can probably keep a below-average BABIP, but that .274 probably is going up, but, well, he's a really good pitcher even if it does. He could stand to get his walks down, but, for the most part, the walks have trended downward and there's plenty of time for that improvement to continue. In short, all the excitement about Lewis is pretty much warranted. That strike out rate is just mind bogglingly, and not really a SSS thing at this point: he's going to strike a lot of guys out. Colbyashi is the ace of this staff, he's probably one of the best pitchers in baseball this year and it looks like a pretty good chance he'll meet those lofty CHONE projections.

Matt Harrison (154 BF): I didn't realize Harrison was giving up all his runs while rocking a .274 BABIP. That's some kind of sad. He did up his K/9 to 5.03, which is not good but it's better than he has been. Of course, he's never been good. Everything else was right in with his career norms, save the walk rate, which could definitely be a sample small sample size issue. And, actually, the velocity of his pitches didn't change much, so I'm wondering how much of his improved "stuff" was just the aberration of a small sample size in exhibition performances. I still think he has a future in the Majors, I'm just not buying in to him being a dramatically better pitcher right now than he has been the last couple years.

 

I'm going to still do Harrison, but it might not be tonight due to a personal situation.

Comment 98 comments  |  14 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Lone Star Ball

Thoughts on a 14-3 win

May 2012 by Adam J. Morris - 10 comments

The Neftali Feliz situation

May 2012 by Adam J. Morris - 153 comments

Thoughts on a 6-1 win

May 2012 by Adam J. Morris - 29 comments

Comments

Display:

Vlad's interesting to look at

Who would have thought that at age 35 after the season he had last year, that he would be able to put up numbers pretty similar to his career line. If it wasn’t for last season, it wouldn’t look like anything has changed at all with him over the past few years.

By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.

"I am one of the biggest Texas Ranger fans out there but I'm also one of the smartest. Deal with it."
-The Outlaw

by Gdawg on May 10, 2010 12:01 PM CDT reply actions  

Same here

I was expecting something better than last season, but he’s hitting the ball like he did in those earlier years with the Angels.

By 2028, Mark Teixeira will be in the HOF.

"I am one of the biggest Texas Ranger fans out there but I'm also one of the smartest. Deal with it."
-The Outlaw

by Gdawg on May 10, 2010 12:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I thought the Vlad worrying was way overblown

a classic case of small sample size and confirmation bias.

Here is a question for philkid3 – are old players like Vlad or very young players like Andrus more variable in their performance, thus prone to longer streaks and require more data points for comparable conclusions to be drawn?

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on May 10, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

I really don't know.

I’ve never read anything suggesting that, but it’s entirely possible. This is obviously based on players in general, so there will obviously be outliers who fall apart or dramatically improve after sample sizes should be stable, and I wouldn’t necessarily be surprised if the majority of those outliers come from certain profiles.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I believe the general rule of thumb is:

The more data points, the more projectable. As players age, there is obviously a downside to their career, but usually not the falling off a cliff that gets so much press and fans spend so much time worrying about. The important part of signing an old player is to figure out what type of skills the player has, how those skills age, and what sort of erosion of play you can expect from the previous year.

As a corollary, most young players don’t improve as much as their fans would expect at the beginning of the year. We see and remember certain cases, but players improve more gradually and over longer periods of time to reach their plateaus than most fans believe/expect.*

*Elvis is awesome.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

no dice

provide the milk and the cookies

by ab03 on May 10, 2010 12:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

I laughed at this.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on May 10, 2010 12:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

you're at over 20,000 comments

well above the number necessary to get a good handle on your antagonist response post % and homer %. I only just recently passed 10K, which means you may know my troll index and baseball IQ, but you can’t really be confident about my minor league knowledge quotient or AJM-parrot %age.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on May 10, 2010 1:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

When can we look at the cumulative team

stats and compare them to last year?

Thank you Houston for drafting Jason Castro.

by RangerMad on May 10, 2010 12:30 PM CDT reply actions  

It depends on what you're looking at.

There are aspects to team success that never stabilize over an entire season.

I’d imagine you have a solid picture after two months, as Moneyball suggests, and you’re probably not due for many more surprises after four months.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure what I would want to look at.

Probably something that points to Hurdles influence on the hitters. Not sure what that would be.

Thank you Houston for drafting Jason Castro.

by RangerMad on May 10, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also,

O-Swing%

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 2:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

and maybe spray charts

for using all fields a bit more. Seems like we had several guys get pull/power happy last year.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 12, 2010 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ugh, I made one of those last night

Going potty at 4 a.m. is always dicey.

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on May 12, 2010 6:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Heh, the old sleepy eye

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 12, 2010 6:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

What about Borbon

he is over the 100 PA mark, and its odd to see Kinsler at 44 PA and not Borbon at 101.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 12:31 PM CDT reply actions  

I'll be posting Borbon.

Kinsler was fast because there’s only one peripheral that isn’t likely subject to sample size, and it’s dramatically out of line from his career, so I just shoved him in right before publishing.

I’m not done, just taking a break.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 12:38 PM CDT up reply actions  

I’m not done, just taking a break.

You better have clocked out. At your rate we can’t afford to pay you for breaks. :)

Thank you Houston for drafting Jason Castro.

by RangerMad on May 10, 2010 12:40 PM CDT reply actions  

I'd have rec'd this just for linking the sample size stabilization points

a valuable link everyone should bookmark.

Even at 60 walks Elvis would be pretty darn valuable, but he’s on pace for over 110. Pretty amazing so far. Elvis is on pace to be a 5 WAR players this year, pretty incredible at 21.

After the first couple of weeks I was a little bit worried about Vlad’s power, but he’s looking pretty good right now. Of course, I’d really like to see him hit a bit better on the road, but still, he’s going well right now.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 10, 2010 1:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Yeah, that's a pretty handy link.

Definitely bookmarked. I liked the link at the bottom of the first page:

525, 600 minutes: How do you measure a player in a year?

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, good stuff

Every once in a while someone will reject an argument that a player got lucky and say something like “what, they were lucky for an entire year?!?” And I’ll say, well, yes, they were. It’s much more possible than people think, and luck plays a much bigger role in every sport than people are willing to admit. We want desperately to believe in our heroes being clutch, not lucky.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 12, 2010 2:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Borbon, Smoak, Treanor and Cruz up.

Cruz’s skill set continues to fascinate me since someone (Snark?) first outlined it last year.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 1:48 PM CDT reply actions  

Cool

I don’t see why anyone would be worried about Smoak. He’s having good at bats, and hitting the ball hard on many outs. I’m looking forward to a solid season from him.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 10, 2010 2:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

By fine you mean

League average like last year?

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah,

I can see the team having an offense like last years. DH and 1B improving somewhat, CF and 3B going backwards and taking all the gains from DH and 1B. C still a nightmare position, that could probably use a midseason acquisiton.

 I think the days of the ’08 Offense are in the past though. I think the Rangers got a little lucky that year with BABIP.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 2:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

another thing to consider

consistency doesn’t show up in the stats. I don’t forsee a team wide slump like they had last June.

Thank you Houston for drafting Jason Castro.

by RangerMad on May 10, 2010 2:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

This is something I'd like to see more about.

Maybe something like standard deviation of batting average/OBP/etc over one-week intervals across a season? Then try to see if there are players who are consistently more consistent over their career, and other players who are consistently more streaky? The former should be more valuable, based on some kinda-similar systems engineering stuff I’ve read. The magnitude/periodicity of the streaks would also be a factor… Has this been looked at before (I can’t imagine that I’m the first person to think of it…)?

I’d try to run some numbers on this myself, but I dunno where to find that kind of data in an easily-computer-parsable/queryable form, though, and I’m not motivated enough to scour baseballreference by hand (to be able to avoid that kinda stuff is why I learned computer programming in the first place).

by Closure GT on May 10, 2010 7:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, thanks.

Nice read. The more consistent = more wins thing didn’t surprise me, but the higher slugging = more consistent part definitely did. (I would’ve expected small ball to be more consistent than relying on big hits.)

And yeah, Markov chains are useful things.

by Closure GT on May 10, 2010 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Wooooah.

Higher SLG is correlated to more consistent run production?

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 2:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

We'll see

so far the offensive start isn’t very impressive.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 2:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

And, in fact, I'd probably say substantially better.

If we just get Treanor’s career averages at catcher, that position hits better than last year. Vlad didn’t even need to hit close to what he has for DH to improve dramatically. If Vlad even close to sustains what he’s been doing — and I’m beginning to feel confident he will — then DH is much better. Kinsler was already a top regression candidate and he’s looking good so far. I don’t think I have to sell you on Elvis’s step forward, and Josh seems like a safe bet to at least be comfortably better. So that’s measurable-to-huge improvement at half the positions. Nellie seems to have a good chance to improve, and an even better candidate to at least repeat 2009, so that leaves center field and third base. I don’t expect MY to repeat 2009, but I’m starting to feel comfortable he’ll be an above-average offensive third baseman, so no harm there. CF is obviously a huge concern, but one sucky position isn’t going to make the whole offense bad.

So we’ll revisit this at a later date, but go ahead and put be down as expecting this offense to be comfortably above average this year, maybe close to 850 runs.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 2:15 PM CDT up reply actions  

Currently, here is how it stacks up by position

Considering the team is down almost across the board, I have trouble seeing substantially better.

C (-.177 OPS)
2009 .234/.286/.379 OPS .665
2010 .158/.280/.208 OPS .488

1B (-.080 OPS)
2009 .226/.272/.411 OPS .684
2010 .179/.273/.330 OPS .604

2B (-.083)
2009 .257/.329/.473 OPS .802
2010 .307/.368/.351 OPS .719

3B (-182)
2009 .315/.364/.505 OPS .869
2010 .277/.333/.354 OPS .687

SS (+.034)
2009 .268/.330/.371 OPS .701
2010 .288/.402/.333 OPS .735

LF (+.012)
2009 .271/.334/.472 OPS .806
2010 .262/.326/.492 OPS .818

CF (-.264)
2009 .271 .323 .448 .771
2010 .215 .234 .273 .507

RF (+.124)
2009 .264/.333/.470 OPS .803
2010 .289/.348/.579 OPS .927

DH (+.056)
2009 .242/.312/.491 OPS .802
2010 .317/.358/.500 OPS .858

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

Down across the board isn't looking forward, though.

As Josh pointed out at BTiA, there is strong evidence the team is hitting better than the actual production suggests, and there’s quite a while to go before you should stop expecting regression.

I mean, I’m a pessimist, but not that much of one.

Also, remember that 2B is down because last year’s 2B hasn’t been playing.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 2:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

We are a

fifth of the way through the season. To be substantially better than last year will take a lot of hitting going forward.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 3:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are 130 games left

you don’t think the team can improve over last year’s run scoring in that time?

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 10, 2010 3:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Rangers...

…have scored 154 runs in 33 games, which is 4.67 runs/game, good for 13th in the majors, and on pace for 756 runs. Last year, the Rangers scored 784 runs, or 4.84 runs/game, good for 10th in the majors.

To overcome this insurmountable gap, the Rangers would have to score 4.88 runs/game the rest of the season to equal last year’s production. I’m not saying it’s a given, as health will play a major role. But that health has also not allowed Kinsler and Cruz to bat in the same lineup, so maybe it’s not all doom and gloom, eh?

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 3:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Going forward from today

I’d expect the Rangers to improve on last year.

The 2009 team scored very well in April and May, 5.42 runs per game in that time. June was terrible, of course, and from June to the end of the season they only scored about 4.58 runs per game. I think they can do better than that this year, approaching 4.7 or 4.8 runs per game from here on out would mean a significantly better chance of staying in first place, I think.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 12, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Definitely...

…depends on the variance, though. Probably some regression in the pitching, but hopefully less errors from the defense and the improving, healthy lineup will more than counteract it.

Holland being up will hopefully alleviate some of the pressure on the bullpen and give you 5 guys you can feel confident about every day…pending Feldman’s GB%.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 3:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

To that end

They seem to have a real lead-off hitter finally, Cruz is still other-worldly, Hambone seems to be better than ’09, Vlad still be Vlad, and Kins looks pretty good thus far. Oh, almost forgot about that Smoak feller.

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on May 12, 2010 6:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yup.

The 8-9 spots are the only 2 downers in the lineup, but they are for most teams. The sad part about that is what could have been…if only Salty and Borbon had reached 80% of their ceilings instead of 40%.

Oh well, that’s how prospecting goes. Sometimes you strike it Elvis, sometimes you strike it Salty.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, ok but

saying it like that ignores a few salient points:
Catcher – the team is not going to put up with that OPS all year. At some point Salty comes back up and/or they make a trade.
1B – Smoak is not going to have a .600 OPS all year. He’s hitting well and has been unlucky. That number comes up.
2B – Um, Kinsler just got back on the roster, that number comes up.
3B – this will be worse than last year, but will come up a bit from the present number and has already started to move in that direction.
CF – Again, like catcher, the team simply will not allow that position to have a .500 OPS all year.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 10, 2010 2:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Excellent and reasonable points.

Further at catcher, that OPS so far this year is driven by Teagarden, who is no longer here, and an unlucky Matt Treanor. Treanor’s career wOBA is .283, primarily in pitchers’ parks, which is just short of what we put up last year at catcher in a hitters’ park. His peripherals this year are right in line with what he’s always done, his BABIP is just down. If we get career-Treanor out of catcher this year — which we can probably expect — then catcher is no worse in 2010.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 2:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Except

C- I’m not sure we have any solutions in house. Until a trade occurs, I have doubts this team meets last year numbers.
CF- We have no good options if Borbon sucks. It’s not like we are swimming in good internal options. I’d be surprised if we get a 700 OPS from this position this year. Another position I’d like to see a trade if possible.
1B- I hope Smoak does better than last year, but expecting a lot of production out of rookies doesn’t even seem to pay off half the time.
2B- Kinsler reinjuring himself isn’t out of the question. He is made of glass, afterall.
3B – No question in my mind that Young can’t get close to last year’s number. I think an 800 OPS is about as good as you can hope for.

I think a lot would have to go right for this offense to substantially surpass last years. 800 runs, maybe.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 3:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Except

C- even without a trade it’s pretty unlikely Treanor or anyone not named Teagarden puts up a .488 OPS the rest of the way
CF – You don’t think Gentry or Boggs, Chavez or even Borbon can beat a .507 OPS the rest of the way? I suppose it could happen, but it seems awfully unlikely that even a replacement level player will do that.
1B – All of Smoak’s underlying stats and the eyeball test say that he’s already playing better than that. A batter with that kind of plate discipline will at least get on base, and that’s a lot more than you can say for 2009.
2B – yes, a possibility

If the team is close to the division lead in July, they’ll make a deal and shore up whichever area needs it the most.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 10, 2010 3:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure they can beat a 500 OPS

but will they get close to or beat last year’s OPS? I doubt it with CF and C. We quite simply don’r have good options at the position. Pick who you want out of Treanor, Borbon, Gentry, Boggs, Salty, and we just aren’t likely to get much of anything in the way of offense.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 10:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

You really think..

…that Justin Smoak is going to have an OPS of .604 the rest of the year?

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I feel he deserves a demerit.

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on May 12, 2010 5:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

You'd have to pin it on his ass.

With his head buried in the sand like that.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

No,

I don’t think that. But its not surprising that that is your dumbass conclusion.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 12, 2010 6:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yup, especially considering RBiA in the summer.

And a healthy lineup.

If they trade for a catcher who hits better (or Max fills that role), then 850 becomes more realistic.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Damn you, philkid3, you launched a preemptive strike.

My plan was to wait until a bunch of guys hit 150 PAs. Now I have to poison your milk and cookies.

Seriously, though, great stuff.

by Josh Garoon on May 10, 2010 2:05 PM CDT reply actions  

No, no, don't be sorry ~ I'm totally joking.

You don’t need to have someone else taste your milk and cookies for you before you consume them.

I mean, I really did have a note to myself about a putting together a possible BBTiA piece as a bunch of Rangers reached 150 PA. Great minds and all that. But more importantly, I really enjoyed reading this ~ and since I agree with just about everything you wrote, now I don’t have to do all that work pulling stats. Bonus!

by Josh Garoon on May 10, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Here's an idea

Use this sort of stat and other data to suggest ways the team could improve the problem spots, C and CF. Look around the league for trade targets who might be having underrated years or are likely candidates to be dealt. Lou Marson, Craig Gentry has minor league trends over the last couple years that are interesting (increasing walk rates for example). etc.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 10, 2010 2:46 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I should sue,

since obviously no one except me could have been thinking about Rangers catching.

I saw that rumor about Pierzynski and thought, meh. He’s a grade A asswipe with meh defense, but his wOBAr is a quite decent .326 right now, a .198 BaBIP keeping his numbers well down. I’d be willing to tolerate his asshole-ness if he can put up league average offense, which is what his peripherals suggest he’ll do.

If I’m Daniels, I’m calling Houston and offering a PTBNL or cash for JR Towles. Towles is already in AA, send him to Frisco and let him play for a bit until you decide whether or not Salty is going to be able to throw ever again and get a very close look at Towles. He’s not sexy, but he would be an upgrade over what they have and he might come cheap. If you don’t like him much, keep him stashed in AA as insurance or throw him in as an extra piece in some other deal.

I’m sure they’ve considered both of these guys and others. Marson could be available soon, though if I were Cleveland I’d ask a good price and if I didn’t get what I liked I’d just keep him as a good backup to Santana.

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 11, 2010 9:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is most excellent

Thanks kid3.

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on May 10, 2010 3:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

Put most of the rotation up.

There’s really not much there worth looking at, frankly. You know a lot less about pitchers at this point by stats than you do with hitters. Still, I wrote out what I was finding, anyway.

I’m a little less excited about Ceej. . .

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 8:12 PM CDT reply actions  

Awesome work.

Although now I’m a lot more worried about Borbon than I was before.

"I think it's funny because everybody wants Ozzie Smith range," Young said. "I want people to show me a guy that has turbo range like that."

by LSJ on May 10, 2010 10:26 PM CDT reply actions  

Really?

Wow, I thought you were more down on him than me. Guess you just showed it more. :p

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 10:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've actually been defending him lately...

Mostly just because I don’t think too much of our other options, including Chavez.

"I think it's funny because everybody wants Ozzie Smith range," Young said. "I want people to show me a guy that has turbo range like that."

by LSJ on May 10, 2010 10:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

I can't argue with you

that our other options are fairly craptastic, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t better options than Borbon this year.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 10, 2010 10:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'll defend his future.

And I think there are some people too excited to hate him, BUT he is struggling and it’s not an aberration or bad luck. And I think he should be sent down at some point largely BECAUSE he’s an important part of the future. I don’t think we’ll be any worse with Chavez (and I actually do think we’ll be better), but Borbon seems to have some things to work on.

FWIW, Chavez has never had a season worse than what Borbon is putting up right now. He’s actually a solid player.

by philkid3 on May 10, 2010 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most of his value is based on his defense though

And I’m a little worried we’re going to find out he’s lost a step or two coming off his knee problems here.

Assuming he’s 100% again, I can definitely see him being a net upgrade over Borbon, but I don’t think we should assume that until Chavez has at least gone on a rehab assignment and convinced the Rangers he’s ready to go.

"I think it's funny because everybody wants Ozzie Smith range," Young said. "I want people to show me a guy that has turbo range like that."

by LSJ on May 10, 2010 11:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm okay with that.

I mean, it sucks if Borbon is, well, sucking, but as long as the team doesn’t think it’s hurting his development and as long as no one else has a strong likelihood of being an improvement, I’m okay with giving him time to snap out of it.

By okay I mean it makes sense. It wouldn’t be okay to watch or anything.

by philkid3 on May 11, 2010 12:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

Some selected Minor League stats

Julio Borbon
22 (A+/AA) 594 PA .321/.362/.425 .787
23 (AAA) 457 PA .307/.367/.386 .753

Endy Chavez
22 (A+) 490 PA .298 /.364/.360 OPS .725
23 (AA-AAA) 298PA .313/.346/.375 OPS .721
24 (AAA) 449 PA .343 /.392 /.467 OPS .859

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 11, 2010 2:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yup.

This is what started the argument between Cahill and I about how long you leave him down for. Obviously, there’s a minimum amount of time, but if he’s showing you something by July, I’m ok with bringing him back up. I just want him to develop and I’m not sure that being under Wash’s bunt-happy-influence is the best way to do that.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 3:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

Good job, philkid

I’d like to see more of this type of stuff.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 3:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Heh...FanGraphs chat today:
Matt “Awesome” Klaassen:
I think “Garden State” is a worse “black mark” for Daniels than the Michael Young contract.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on May 12, 2010 3:27 PM CDT reply actions  

Interesting bit about sample sizes

I’m always intrigued by the Thad Levine study that Newberg reported which said

• Major league ballplayers tend to peak between age 26 and age 31
• 90 percent of hitters reach their career norms after amassing 750 at-bats in the big leagues
• 82 percent of pitchers reach their career norms after logging 100 innings in the big leagues

So, most likely we know what Harrison is, what Saltalamacchia is, almost know what Davis is. I need to go through all the other players to see who is most likely where they are gonna end up.

"No, I'm not a pessimist. At some point the world shits on everybody. Pretending it ain't shit makes you an idiot, not an optimist."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on May 12, 2010 4:08 PM CDT reply actions  

How many throws back to the pitcher

before that’s normalized for Salty?

Ceterum censeo, Ron Washington esse delendam

by t ball on May 12, 2010 6:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting

In a sense, matchups result in small samples. Against a given team, versus a particular pitcher, using a series or even a game as a basis. And that brings in a possible answer to “what does this have to do with you?” questioning. One of the things that makes baseball fun to watch is what happens that defies the sample-to-date expectations. Even stuff like last year’s “Cruz can’t hit MLB lefties”, versus this season so far his 1/000+ OPS against LHP.

Seeing where everybody else lies on Levine’s progress curve will be very interesting.

"He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lamp-posts... for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang (1844-1912) also -

"Telephone, n. An invention of the devil which abrogates some of the advantages of making a disagreeable person keep his distance."
~Ambrose Bierce

by Ed Coffin on May 15, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hong_kong_small
OT: UEFA Euro 2012 Thread
Small
Ranger Rowdy Time!
Bc0nc_small
Minors Thread: Mid-Late May

Recent FanPosts

Macho_man_randy_savage_small
Sunday OT
Small
Loking for Batters' Eye Club 7/24 or 25
Small
Texas Rangers: 2012 Community Mock Draft Picks
Macho_man_randy_savage_small
Saturday OT
White_blackpool_icon_small
Draft Discussion
Small
MOD#6 - Rangers (2nd Round - 93rd Pick)
Andy_small
Afternoon OT Thread
Macho_man_randy_savage_small
5/25 OT 1
Neftali_old_timey_small
5/24/2012 OT 2
Camera_small
5/24 OT #1

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris

Editor

477845_small ghostofErikThompson

Author

Matchstick_small Brad