Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Celtics Vs. Heat Game 1: Game Time, TV Schedule And More

College is for suckers.


I was fascinated by the LSB Education level fanpost, and how it was sort of accepted that a college education somehow makes a person "better."  It doesn't.  College is for suckers.  Don't get me wrong, if someone is going to pay for it, and you can get out with no debt, more power to you, but increasingly higher education is turning into a sucker's game.

See, I've got authority issues.  I don't like people telling me what to study, or when to be someplace, or whatever.  But 500 years ago, a university made a certain amount of sense: books were a luxury item, a sign of wealth; the overall educational attainment of the general populace was atrocious; long distance communication was ridiculously difficult.  So it made some sense to have a central repository of learning because if you stayed at home in Shitford-on-Blyefordshire you would only ever see like 20 people, all of whom only knew about sheep and farming, and there wouldn't be any books.

But why is this a necessary model now?  Not only are we increasingly finding even esoteric fields of information freely available in both lecture and written formats, but one can't even argue that you are getting some kind of personalized attention in a lecture hall with 500 other students.  A sufficiently inquisitive person receives no benefit from a university setting, because they are incurring opportunity costs by not engaging in productive work for 4 to 5 years to be told specifically what areas they may study and paying a premium to do so.

To a certain extent, a university education has traditionally served as a classist signaling mechanism, but what good is that mechanism now?  50 years ago it was somewhat rare to have a college degree, not so much anymore.  Sure, there are jobs that require a college degree as a condition for application, but every job I've ever had I've shared with college graduates, and I have a GED and no degree.

There are some things that higher education has in common with the subprime bubble: government subsidized assumption of risk through leverage, declining ROI, stated government policy of increasing accessibility to an asset or good.  Some of you guys have heard me mention Crazy Ryan before, my schizophrenic friend.  He lives in a group home and is on Social Security disability.  He was approached by a trade school recruiter, offering him $20k in student loans for automechanic classes.  Is this what we've come to?  Encouraging disabled people to take on $20k in non-dischargable debt because "education is GOOD!" 

Fuck that.

Change is coming.  Those of us in Gen X are probably the last group that will see any real tangible benefit from a college education, and it's dwindling.

Comment 730 comments  |  8 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I have an MA

and…yeah, I’m kinda nodding in agreement.

Sometimes it feels like I have a prison tattoo.

That aside, I met people who changed my life for the better in college. No regrets there.

Go Strangers.

by hightowersmith on Jul 14, 2010 10:33 PM CDT reply actions  

The J.D. is getting that way, too...

apparently.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 10:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

I couldnt agree more benmor

Nodding all the way through as if I wrote this myself. My degree was worthwhile but as I look into setting up savings for my childrens’ college set to begin in 19+ years… I see that subprime bubble. I can’t imagine college being “worth it” in 20 years.

"I think that Rangers is good team." ~ South Korean Ranger Nation

by hubcityraider on Jul 19, 2010 10:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Oh and I thought ab03 wanted to know my education level

Cause he wanted to get to know me better. I get it now.

Gee, thanks for the confidence ab03.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 14, 2010 10:38 PM CDT reply actions  

If you want to work a phone bank

a high school GED is enough, I guess.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 14, 2010 10:51 PM CDT reply actions  

Where you keep very expensive phones that you want to be safe.

Duh.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 10:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Or perhaps less expensive phones to which you have some kind of emotional attachment.

Like Grandpa’s old phone that he used to dial when he was a little senile because he thought it communicated with aliens.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Someone is a little pissed about the 7/14 thread.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know it now, and I commented back.

I retracted my statement.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 11:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

ILL RETRACT YOU AQUAMAN...

IM JUST HAVING FUN OUT HERE! IM JUST SLINGIN’ IT.

by cmkelly29 on Jul 14, 2010 11:07 PM CDT up reply actions  

HE'S A POSTING MAVERICK!

CMKELLY IS JUST A KID PLAYING THE LSB GAME IN A SCHOOLYARD!

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Butt shit

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

How do you pay interest

on phones?

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 14, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Cry

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 15, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess it depends

on the goal of your education. If the goal is a well paying job, I have trouble seeing how the degree helps all that much.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think I'm having an easier time at it in law school

With my background in liberal arts than my buddies whose programs were more focused.

I studied four years at Austin College (and I was fortunate enough to study in Spain, Costa Rica, and Australia while in school for hardly any additional cost). I couldn’t be happier with the diveristy of education/experience, and there are very few subjects where I’m just absolutely lost because I’ve taken at least an introductory course in most disciplines.

Like Ben was saying, I can learn the few additional classes someone took with a more extensive/focused business degree in a matter of months if I decide it’s pertinent to my job. It would take that same person a lot longer to catch up to the broader education of a liberal arts degree, imo.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Indeed.

Because generating a marxist critique to The Overcoat is broader, and more relevant, experience.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure what you mean by that

And, I don’t feel like researching The Overcoat because I’m already blowing off enough of my work day with this intriguing thread.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

The Overcoat...

is a fascinating Russian short story about a Tsarist Russian civil service employee. I thought it a poignant reference in a thread about indebting oneself to be a wage slave.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

no

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 7:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

I named my cat Oscar

How do you know O Page?

And I caught the sarcasm, it was just over my head.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Right on

I wonder if we inadvertantly met and scowled at each other at some point

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Except

there is rarely any reason for anyone to catch up to a broader education of a liberal arts degree. Most of the information has as much application as phrenology.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

I love bumps!

"Ooooh....I want some fucking pancakes!" son of willamos2

by Parman on Jul 20, 2010 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nope

We have a real problem with credential inflation in the US. Neither my brother, a bond trader in Chicago with a BS in biochem, or my sister an advertising account executive with a BBA in marketing need a college degree to do their jobs. It is just that the jobs required one.

by jf55510 on Jul 14, 2010 11:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

For the most part, getting a degree of a given kind is just a signal.

But the value of the signal has diminished as more people have gotten them relative to the slots demanding them.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 11:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Like any signal...

as the signal to noise ratio gets closer to 1, the decision makers will start choosing another signal.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly

Though your “signal” for the concept is better.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 11:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not that I agree that college is only meant as a signal

but any thoughts as to a better signal? Would you rather just have standardized tests?

There are cultures that do that already, although they still use college as a basis. Those cultures look pretty fondly on the U.S. education system – at least the people that don’t just dominate those tests (which are a lot of people).

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know.

I’m trying to exit the system that is still clinging to those signaling mechanisms. What signals will I use for hiring? I don’t know.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

What I don't understand

Is whatever signal you choose, won’t the demand skyrocket and basically put you in the same position?

by brettgardner on Jul 14, 2010 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Standardized tests are terrible

in gauging someone’s ability to be a good employee. I had a friend who had a 1600 in the SAT and likewise scored very high in the ACT and SAT2. I also had a couple friends who scored in the 1500’s.

One of them is a good worker. One is only an average at best worker. The final one is completely lazy and has yet to graduate from College as a part of his laziness.

College basically shows that you have perseverance and are willing to dedicate yourself to 4-5 years of school even though most HS graduates would rather be doing anything other than paying to go to school. At least that is the signal that a college degree shows me.

by Akalhar on Jul 15, 2010 4:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have a B.S. in Latin American History

but I’m a project engineer for a fire alarm contractor.

Yeah, I don’t understand it either.

She say she are the manager.

by rockin_rangers on Jul 14, 2010 11:03 PM CDT reply actions  

B.A. in History and Political Science

I work for a fairly large Energy company doing large structured deals. I’m so out of my league on some things because of the degree I got, but the degree got me in the door. Without one I wouldn’t be here. And here is veddy veddy good to me.

My personal opinion is that college was so very worth the expense given the return for me. I would recommend it to anyone.

I find it a little funny the guy without the degree (and there is nothing wrong with that mind you) is not only telling us they aren’t worth it, but that he’s trying to remove himself from the world that essentially requires them.

I still love you Ben. You may well be right, but I have my doubts.

by bdavison94 on Jul 15, 2010 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I have a high school diploma.

I am a senior system administrator at my company.

IT, though, seems to have been the exception to the degree requirement for a LONG time. I know plenty of manager-types with degrees, but almost none of the techie-types I work with have degrees.

"I think I'm going to name my new car Scooter, because it dominates on the road." - mikeyoungfuturehof, 9.10.09
"I’ve been a Rangers fan all my life and I can tell you there’s been plenty of fucking crying in baseball…" - WhipSmart, 6.3.08

by Lisa W on Jul 14, 2010 11:12 PM CDT reply actions  

I have a BS degree in IT and MS certifications

While experience matters most the BS actually has opened a lot more doors than the certifications. It all depends on what someone is looking for, though.

by northtexan95 on Jul 15, 2010 6:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

The degree is likely to get you more starting salary at some companies

I know some put rankings on credentials to base your salary.

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 15, 2010 7:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Question for you IT guys.

Is an AAS in IT a waste of time?

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 15, 2010 10:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

IT industry

Seems to put more emphasis on certifications and knowledge/ experience than a degree. But I’m seeing more and more job’s are wanting a degree but as always they will ignore that with the proper skills.

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 15, 2010 7:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I have MSCE+I and CCNE

Tons of schooling, but no formal degree, and I was a Sr Field Service Engineer for a large co and used to travel all over the US…killing that expense account was fun, but the travel did get old. Now I am in a completely unrelated career.

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on Jul 15, 2010 12:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

x
See, I’ve got authority issues. I don’t like people telling me what to study, or when to be someplace, or whatever.

Well, nobody in college tells you what to study or when to be somewhere. They just say if you want to have a degree with our name on it, these are the requirements.

More to the point, I don’t understand your position, really. A college degree is indeed a signal, but I don’t at all understand why you just assume it’s a symbol of class alone.

The value is really that when somebody’s looking over a one-sheet resume, they see that you have a degree in X, and, well, that means you probably have at least some more understanding of that subject than someone without it. It’s a generalization, sure, but when operating on extremely limited information, I don’t see why having just a bit more isn’t a good thing.

The cost of college is certainly becoming prohibitive for a lot of people, but that seems to me quite a different question from whether college itself is a bad idea.

Certainly you wouldn’t begrudge a certification system?

by brettgardner on Jul 14, 2010 11:14 PM CDT reply actions  

I do begrudge college as a certification system.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

No.

I mean any certification system like you would acquire on-the-job or in furtherance of it.

Experience isn’t worthless.

by brettgardner on Jul 14, 2010 11:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm actually saying that experience is worth a lot more than a degree.

That’s what I was saying up there in referring to college’s opportunity costs.

Engineering, that’s something that I could see requiring a degree. But why would, say, a corporate employer look for a degree for a trainable white-collar job?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because it's bullshit.

Four years and tens of thousands of dollars, and people come out with a sense of entitlement and the cold hard reality that they are going to have to take an entry level job they could have probably had without a degree.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think I see where this post originated...

I know I was wondering.

people come out with a sense of entitlement

Was she female, and cute?

Work supervisor?

Go Strangers.

by hightowersmith on Jul 14, 2010 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, no...

I ignore people up here. Though youngish recent grads who work in the entry level positions around here often say “why am I having to do this, I have a finance degree?” which I think is funny.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah ha!

So because you have to deal with dipshits that think they should have $100k a year handed to them because of the ol’ sheepskin you think the system is broken. Those people exist at all education levels.

by bdavison94 on Jul 15, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

No, that is not why I think the system is broken.

I just think it’s funny.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

How does one enter that field?

You need to start somewhere and in highly coveted entry jobs, those employers need signals

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

nah on engineering either

I have a relative that started as a Plumber in a big commercial construction company, after 15 or so years he was doing most of the engineering for important hospital plans

by blueballlefty on Jul 14, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have a hard time believing

that he does that with no formal education above high school. Maybe not a University, but something more than sweat and experience.

by bdavison94 on Jul 15, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

doing most of the engineering for important hospital plans

Might do most of the plans but probably works under an engineer who has the project responsibilty.

by RangerMad on Jul 15, 2010 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

Does he need a PE?

or can they sub the work that needs a PE out? There is a lot of work being done in engineering without PEs.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 17, 2010 12:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

And your alternative?

Write an essay about your life experiences? Or just certification tests?

I mean certification tests would work more than a few professions. In CA, you don’t have to go to law school, you can just pass the Bar. Of course, I’m not sure how well those lawyers do because again, you need some sort of signalling method and there’s no way to get a good signal from BAR tests.

And already, people complain about the BAR as being inadequate. I’m sure 75% of the people that would get boned by the bad signal would object to any test

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

There's not a real good record for job placement...

for any law graduates right now. So at least the people in CA don’t have a shit-ton of debt to discharge.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

Job placement for law graduates is a temporary thing

There’s not a great record for job placement for any job. There aren’t many jobs out there. When the demand for jobs change, employers are going to need signals. They can’t go by BAR pass/fail.

And it doesn’t matter if you pass the BAR in CA if you can’t get any clients.

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why do you think it's a temporary thing?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

You think the demand for lawyers has permanently decreased

but that decrease is unrelated to the general economic downturn? Or do you think we are permanently at 10% unemployment?

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

It could be permanently decreased.

I don’t know. There are 50k law graduates a year, are there 50k new law jobs a year?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are a lot of people that eventually exit the field

Probably too many people go to law school that shouldn’t. Anyway, I’m not interested in finding them all jobs. There should be some weeding out mechanism and if you actually do shitty in law school, I don’t have a problem with you not getting a job. In terms of that sort of signal, I think law school is accurate.

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okay, so if 50k are graduating...

how many do you think get jobs? You said that the legal job market slump is temporary.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

http://butidideverythingrightorsoithought.blogspot.com/

Here’s two young ladies that graduated from T-14 law schools and they bitch constantly about th ejob market.

Follow the links in their sidebar, bunch of people saying the same stuff.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

The job market is shitty right now

It’s been shitty for awhile, and the model is shitty for biglaw firms.

What’s your point? Most of my graduating friends had jobs lined up.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

Great, I hope it works out for them.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly. My cousin that graduated and lives in Chicago had a 6 figure job lined up

My cousin that graduated and lives in Fort Wayne, Indiana can’t find a job in a much smaller market. If she was willing to move, she would have a job.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 8:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Also

the original statement isn’t correct. Job placement for lots of law graduates is fine, just not as stellar as it once was. Even if that never changes back, though I think it will, it’d still be fine. People who do well at law schools haven’t had too much trouble finding jobs.

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know.

Not from what I’m reading.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know this sounds arrogant

But I read about this way way way more than you. It’s my profession and I’m living it. Unless you are trading money on this, there’s no way you read about this more than I do.

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm also very tapped in to a major legal market

I could tell you with decent accuracy what the employment rate is at for the top 20% at all of the law schools here

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you working as a lawyer right now?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Alright.

But there is any good, hard data about job prospects for graduates, I’m sure you would agree with that.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think there is enough data to suggest that if you do well

at most law schools, you will find a job. Maybe not the great job you were hoping for, but a job. There are lots of completely shitty law schools that probably shouldn’t take anyone (that the article refers to) and there are probably a lot of expectations that are too high.

But beyond all of that, nothing indicts the system. At worst, it just means the people who do well at better law schools get the jobs. It seems like a reasonable signalling mechanism. There should be more transparency about job prospects but there are enough blogs out there that have documented the issues.

Anyway, if the legal market doesn’t correct itself, transparency won’t be an issue. This is the internet age

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

The blogs he links...

are spreading the word. I think it’s safe to say that the numbers the law schools are claiming are bullshit.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, they're misleading

I guess I wouldn’t think that is a big deal. Graduates are fully aware of what the real numbers are. We know how many of our friends have jobs

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

0L's aren't fully aware.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think
Graduates are fully aware of what the real numbers are. We know how many of our friends have jobs

is overly generalized. Maybe graduates should know, but I think you’re exaggerating how many actually do.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Only one school's sample

But, at my law school, it’s a conversation that comes up in class and casual conversation weekly.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 7:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

I’m familiar with at least one group of graduates that didn’t seem to have been fully aware just what the market was like when they graduated about a year ago. I imagine it varies from place to place, school to school, and group to group.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 7:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thats ridiculous

the market crashed last year. Nobody knew what the market was like. IT’s not like the ball has been actively hidden for years.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 5:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, over generalized

I only have have sampled every law school in a major law market

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 5:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I have personal knowledge

of at least one group that was taken off-guard by how bad the market was. You can dispute that all you want.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 10:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

The Class of 2009

Was caught off guard just like every firm was caught off guard just like every lawschool was caught off guard. Number manipulation happened for that year.

The people who are applying to law schools are the people who are possibly getting dicked. The people who graduated recently are just like everybody else – finding out what happened as we are all finding out what happened

by ab03 on Jul 16, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

Was slated to graduate with my undergrad in May 2009

knew what was coming in late mid fall 2008 and started the process to start my masters in Aug 2010 instead of doing it part time while working.

I am sympathetic to the problems the financial crunch caused to new graduates. As an example the median starting salary for my department for 2009 dropped into the mid to low 40’s, this year but us back to the mid 50’s.

JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook

by laxtonto on Jul 16, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

http://balkin.blogspot.com/2010/06/wake-up-fellow-law-professors-to.html

That’s the post that got me looking at the law school numbers. There’s big problems with employment reporting for law schools because their incentives are so aligned to inflate the numbers.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

We're out there in the jungle 8 hours a day!

Really, it seems like the crisis is mostly centered around BigLaw, though I know that’s a rather extreme generalization.

by brettgardner on Jul 14, 2010 11:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Pretty ginormous blanket statement you've got going there.

Highly dependent on the individual schools and the individual applicants.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 15, 2010 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

No

I think it just depends on my definition of well

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

This.

The economy just sucks across the board right now.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 14, 2010 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Assuming everything holds to plan

December of next year I’ll have an MBA with a grand total of $8000 out of pocket spend on college, and the rest picked up by my employer/the taxpayer. Worth it, I’d say, though it took a tremendous amount of time on my part. Time that I could have spent on Xbox Live trolling and saying things that would make Dirkatron blush. But still worth it, I’d say.

by macromorgan on Jul 14, 2010 11:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Fuck man, don't tell me that.

I’ve been getting my ass kicked in the world without one and I’m working on trying to get some kind of degree knocked out right now.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 14, 2010 11:21 PM CDT reply actions  

Just gets me down.

I get where he’s coming from and I’ve kind of been struggling with that as well but I finally decided to bite the bullet and at least try to get something. I’m not paying for it so I’m not out any money. I’ve always done fairly blue collar jobs and I’m trying to make the transition into something else, in large part because I don’t really have a choice. I just don’t want to feel like I’m wasting my time.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 14, 2010 11:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

You do what you want to do.

Just make sure its what you actually want to do, and then put everything you have into it.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 14, 2010 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

At the very least

finding success with out a college degree is so much harder. If you’re not paying for it, and your time is already not so valuable (assuming the blue collar work you’re doing isn’t leading somewhere), I don’t see the downside

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah that's kind of where I'm at with it.

Plus I had an accident within the past year or so that took some of the use of one of my arms, so I can’t do some of the more highly physical stuff that I used to be able to do. As good of an excuse as any to make a change I guess, because I wasn’t going anywhere fast working on cars/crawling around in attics/etc…

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 14, 2010 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mean

if you want to move out of blue collar work, you should because unless you like it, it has few advantages. And the best way to do that is to get a degree. I think by far the easiest way.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Does any of your argument assume that you actually did well in college?

Because that’s kind of a useful signal too.

Or, does it assume advanced study? It’s fine if you are preaching to business types or managerial types. I don’t see how it makes sense to engineers, doctors, or other high skilled professionals

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:23 PM CDT reply actions  

One of the big drivers of costs

in the medical field is, IMO, the limited number of doctors we turn out. Sure, doctors should go to school, but do they really need a four year degree to go to medical school?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

from what I understand, they might as well because they probably have to get at least 2 of those years in some form of schooling. Probably closer to 3. What’s the difference if it’s 3 year trade school or college (which can be accomplished in 3 fairly easily)

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

There is a value to weeding out wannabe doctors

You ideally want the hardest working and most intelligent people as your doctors.

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2010 11:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

How is an undergraduate degree really weeding anyone out?

If medical school is rigorous, wouldn’t medical school itself weed people out without the unneeded undergraduate degree?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

wouldn't that be a waste of medical school resources?

They would have to admit 5 or 10 students to get a graduate.

Hey Tom - It's over now, so do you know how - to pick up the pieces and go home?

by tricer on Jul 14, 2010 11:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why would they have to do that?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Weeding out

students, its a big investment for med schools to take in students for 6-7 years…

100% J. Arias supporter from day 1

by miles on Jul 14, 2010 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mean

the U.S. doesn’t just blindly accept an English medical license. If I had to guess, I’m sure it’s adequate, I’m not sure ours isn’t better.

But I really don’t know.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

They have to take certification tests

if they are certified in other countries, it’s a lot more troublesome for med school graduates who are not yet doctors from other countries. That process seem pretty tedious.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

I don’t think that British doctors’ training, at a degree level (before residency), is inferior to that of Americans at a similar point in their training.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wonder

how much different supply and demand is in a socialized medicine country. I would guess that being a doctor is not as lucrative as it is in the US (or at least used to be)… so there are likely less people wanting to be MDs and thus less need for a weed-out mechanism.

by JShoe on Jul 15, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

I spent a semester in the Netherlands

And we spent some time with their health care system (all in the hospital). It’s very different. They have to go to school for less time, get paid much less, and are exposed to less litigation.

In my experience, they are also generally unhappier. This could be because even though they get paid less than doctors here do, they still get taxed in (on of) the top tax bracket(s). More than 50%.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hmmm, how?
so there are likely less people wanting to be MDs and thus less need for a weed-out mechanism.

I intended my response to talk about some of the differences I experienced and then discuss why, in my experience (which I realize is solely anecdotal), the profession doesn’t have the same sort of allure as it does in the US.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Level of taxation and related unhappiness

doesn’t really have much to do with education-driven supply and demand of medical students.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:18 PM CDT up reply actions  

I disagree in this case

6 years of school, long hours, you come out making 100K, but then have to pay 52% or some such. That’s a pretty dramatic drop, at least to me.

It’s something that they complain about a lot; many of them talked about how they discourage their kids from going into the field. Granted, this was 8 years ago, so maybe it’s different now.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

But tax level has little to do with the structure

of the medical education. It’s mainly an external factor. It doesn’t speak to the point raised about the British (or any other) medical education system, which is what started all of this.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was just responding/giving weight

To this idea:


 I wonder
how much different supply and demand is in a socialized medicine country. I would guess that being a doctor is not as lucrative as it is in the US (or at least used to be)…

I did not mean to comment on whether or not the British system would be better or work here.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

OK.

I read that as a response to the point about the British managing just fine with their system of medical education, so I didn’t see where you were going with it. This makes sense.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

medical school

would be another 2+ years without the pre-med prep

by thedudeabides on Jul 16, 2010 10:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's not unnecessary

I’m saying the necessary schooling probably takes that long. There might be only a handful of classes but they build on each other which makes it hard to just take them all in a year.

Obviously, colleges do have extra classes that they make you take to get a well rounded education. Maybe you don’t need those. But, I’m pretty sure state schools don’t actually do that too much

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

75%

?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

Could be much, much lower.

There are folks who major in history, take the minimum required courses in college (or simply enroll in post-bacc courses), and become doctors.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 14, 2010 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Which was the point I was getting at.

Even science degrees have a significant amount of non-health or science related filler.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

A well rounded

education is a bad thing now?

100% J. Arias supporter from day 1

by miles on Jul 14, 2010 11:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

Why is college...

what defines a well-rounded education?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

No no no

that’s not what he said. Science majors don’t have that much filler.

you can be a history major and still go to med school as long as you’ve had like 40 hours (roughly) of certain classes (or know the material).

But that’s completely different. That’s someone choosing to be a history major and then deciding to go to med school or choosing history knowing they won’t get to study it again

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

So if someone can major in History and go to med school...

why even require undergrad at all?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was a history major

and I’m doing med school.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 14, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

But you took

all of the required science classes that the med school wanted from you, correct?

100% J. Arias supporter from day 1

by miles on Jul 15, 2010 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Like I said

those 40 hours would probably take someone 2-3 years. They can’t all be taken at the same time.

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a waste.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

How?

I just said you need 40 hours as a foundation for med school

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

How many credit hours is a degree?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Depends on what you're pursuing

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

If we posit 120 hours.

That’s 80 wasted hours.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

2/3 of it...

basically.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

You wouldn't consider political science, economics, business admin, psychology courses

Helpful to a doctor’s education? As a member of society, don’t you want the general knowledge of these concepts understood by most people?

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

at the very least

a writing course would be helpful.

At best, Ben has streamlined education. But at some point, that education has to come from somewhere.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Streamlining education can be a big benefit.

I think that one of the reasons that medical costs are so high is because the AMA artificially depresses the numbers of practicing doctors.

If you say there are 5 slots open each year for medical students, and the course of study takes 7 years, at the end of 20 years you have 65 doctors. If you have 5 slots open but the course of study takes 5 years, at the end of 20 years you have 75 doctors. You also increase the productive length of their careers, decreasing the deadweight loss associated with training, increasing aggregate supply and likely driving down costs.

Of course, there are other competing pressures applied to the market. The ABA recently allowed doc review work to be outsourced to India, and resources like LegalZoom have completely reshaped the legal services industry from the time that I worked in that field. Radiology is being outsourced by the medical profession, probably there will be other functions being outsourced, as well. It’s possible that outsourcing of medical services (diagnostics and such) will reduce demand for medical services to the extent that we will start seeing costs moving in the right direction.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 3:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

That should read...

“It’s possible that outsourcing of medical services will increase supply of”

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 3:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

those would be pretty awful waste of time for most med students.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

But I think thats his point........

Why does studying political science in a classroom make you a more well rounded person than working as a nursing assistant for 2 years……. Both experience would make you a better candidate for med school, but having a Bachelors is required and work experience is preferred but not required…..

by Soltheman3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

My view

Is that it builds a more well-rounded, educated person. Schools aren’t just educating doctors—they’re the same people that will serve on our city boards and who vote.

It’s in the country’s best interest to have smarter citizens, imo.

I realize this same substance-material can be learned outside of the class, but in my experience, people aren’t willing to demonstrate the initiative at a young age to educate themselves in an area that won’t directly impact their immediate careers. I think Ben may be giving young adults too much credit.

Universities are forcing well-rounded educations on young adults. I know I’m thankful for mine.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 7:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, again

Saying that some universities aren’t up to snuff doesn’t really serve Ben’s argument, imo.

I completely agree with the argument, “Do NOT go to a bad law school, unless you’re incredibly entrepreneurial”

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 7:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

It serves Ben's argument fine.

If many ~ perhaps most ~ undergraduate degrees aren’t providing the benefits you claim for them, then it backs some of his points.

Law school is a different question.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 11:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's a lot more

So again, I repeat, you probably still need at least 2 years

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

At the very least

that’s probably a good estimate.

A lot of countries have 2 years undergrad before med school, so who knows.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Those post-bacc sequences take at least 1 year right?

But I don’t really see how. You need chemistry and bio before you take cell bio and bio chem.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Also, pre-reqs vary.

I think there are schools where a year of organic, a year of biochem/molecular bio, a semester of genetics, and a semester of physics, on top of your minimum-science undergrad degree, could get you pretty close to fulfilling all of them.

I could be wrong; it’s been a while since I considered med school.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

that’s about what I had. That’s two years of science classes

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

No way

a year of foundation and a year of advanced. Again, this assumes inadequate high school level education, which is the norm

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

I had inadequate high-school prep.

If I’d wanted, I could’ve done all of this by mid-way through my sophomore year of college. I know folks (admittedly, with better high-school educations) who did.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

I considered it

I took the MCAT, got to the interview process

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

The interviews

probably the most costly part of the med school process

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's not why I didn't do it

I just had a change of heart I guess. Didn’t like my options. Wasn’t as into it as I thought I’d be.

Within a few months I started working at a law firm and didn’t turn back

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

I had the same

experience, but the other way.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

You pretty much

have to know the stuff they’ll ask on the MCATs, though a rudimentary background in some of the advanced sciences are probably needed.

As far as chemistry and physics go, I suppose they both look nice, but probably not 100% essential. It just depends on the person

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 14, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

And the med school.

A lot of med schools still have pre-reqs you have to have taken at an undergrad level.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 14, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

True

stuff like Biochemistry is usually required, but it’s usually not that much out of the norm. Certainly not enough where you couldn’t pursue an alternate major.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's on the MCAT

and you don’t think chemistry is essential to med school?

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

Sure

but most of the stuff on the Chem MCAT is pretty simplistic. Some people just do the review course stuff and wing it there.

I took my share of chem classes, and so far, no, they haven’t been that pertinent.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

This assumes you had some chemistry in high school

I have a friend in med school right now who actually had a biochem PhD going into it. He talks about using that stuff all the time in pharm, in genetics. I’m sure you can get by but I bet he understands more.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Meh

biochem is a core requirement in most med schools, yeah, but it’s not so difficult that you shouldn’t be able to pick it up.

Really, most of what med school is is how good you are at memorizing information and storing it. We don’t go deeply enough into anything where something like a Biochem PHD or even a undergrad class is a requirement.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

I mean

this probably speaks to an underlying issue. Most are memorizing and my friend is learning. I’m sure you can be a fine doctor just memorizing but I bet you can be a better doctor learning.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's assuming quite a bit

we cover so much information that if your friend is learning everything being thrown at him, I am in awe of his abilities. In this year, I recieved about 5000 pages of written notes for all my classes.

Now, if he remembers all of that, that’s pretty amazing, but really, most doctors use Med School as an entry level education. We really start learning once you get into residency and fellowship.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah.

Of friends of mine who’ve been in med school recently, or are now, one stands out as a really inquisitive, bright guy ~ and even he admits he’s memorizing more than absorbing.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

and

a lot of people are really selective about what they absorb. I admit I paid a lot more attention to stuff that interested me/stuff that I knew might be on the Step1 than I did on the other stuff.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

I’m sure he is forgetting a lot of what he learned too. But it certainly doesn’t hurt him that he has extra foundation.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm sure it helps him

but it also isn’t a necessity, not even close. Nor are a lot of other classes.

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

99% of the folks in med school

don’t have that level of training in biochem, and I’d guess a large number of them forget almost everything they learned about biochem by the time they finish the MCAT, only to have to learn it again in med school.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

Biochemistry in medical school is just..

..different. It’s similar enough at first, but the emphasis on diseases and laying the groundwork for physiology and pharmacology.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nope

Although, I certainly understand why a growing number of schools require it as a pre-req. They don’t want to have to teach the fundamentals; it takes too long. You get a fly-by for the first bit, but then it’s onward to more relevant things. For those who haven’t taken it, it’s a bit more work. But good students do well and poor students don’t. Med school is hard enough that very few poor students do well.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

This.

A lot depends on what you came into undergrad with (for example, AP credits), and what you want to leave with, and whether you’re willing to do some post-bacc work.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 14, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Your not

going to win this one…

A ton of classes…

Series of chemistry, physics, many biologist..

Its all about weeding the real people from the fake ones before med school..

Makes Med school more prestigious, then making better doctors…

100% J. Arias supporter from day 1

by miles on Jul 14, 2010 11:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know plenty of people wanting to be "doctors"

I wouldn’t ask them to pick up my mail, most of them are no good people. Don’t give me the prestigious arrogance shit about “med school.” I could apply with my p.o.s accounting and finance degree if I wanted to, all I’d have to do is do well on MCAT.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

Miles you're in college.

What the fuck is up with your godawful grammar?

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 8:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's miles,

he’s a pissy bitch-whipped boy

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 11:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would think close to 80%

I was pre-med initially so I’m going off memory but personal memory. It’s fairly high. Easier to think of the required non science classes. And I doubt they topped more than 20 credits out of 120

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

It depends on their major

To take the MCAT, you need 2 semester of Biology, 2 of Chemistry, 2 of Organic chemistry, 2 of physics. I can’t remember if 1 of genetics is required or just strongly recommended; 1 of biochem is also pretty helpful.

There’s a writing and verbal section as well, so English courses help also, but a good high school education is probably sufficient.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

I guess not technically no

But it’s supposed to cover the topics covered in those courses.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sure.

But if the question is, “could you do well on the MCAT without a college degree, or even more than 1-2 years of courses,” the answer is yes. You could learn much of what you needed to know via books, online courses, and other resources, in fact, without ever paying tuition.

Whether that would get you far in the med-school application process is a different question.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:20 PM CDT up reply actions  

I mean, it sounds good in theory

But I’m not sure I’ve ever encountered somebody who had both the requisite intelligence, drive, and hatred of the college setup to do it.

If we’re talking about what the median doctor does, or what they could do, I still don’t see how a good model is to teach yourself the basic minimum that you need for the MCAT and go on from there. Even throwing out the advanced sciences courses often helping you in medical school (because you can do very well having never taken them), it takes more to be a good doctor (and subsequently, medical school applicant) than to be good at learning information and taking a test. Sure, we have some that get in, but they generally go into fields like radiology and pathology. That’s fine, and we need those, but the skills that most doctors need are different from the skills needed to, say, be a great researcher.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

I agree with almost all of this.

Ben’s post is mostly about theory, though, right?

I will say that most of the doctors who’ve provided my care (and I’ve had a bunch, unfortunately) tend to fail (some epically) at the social side of their job, so clearly, something in the training is not going the way you feel it should.

And I don’t see why the British system wouldn’t work just as well in all of these respects, though.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm all for whatever produces the most doctors.

Cheaply.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Obviously

Doctors’ salaries are the reason we have such expensive medical care.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:56 PM CDT up reply actions  

don't forget about the prices for prescription drugs

"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
"HE GETS THE GODDAM CLEAT" by philkid3

by jam0152 on Jul 15, 2010 1:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sarcasm, jelly. Sarcasm.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 1:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

pft... I know.

I was… shut up.

"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
"HE GETS THE GODDAM CLEAT" by philkid3

by jam0152 on Jul 15, 2010 1:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a component.

No reason to be snarky. Increasing the supply of doctors would drive that cost component down.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

They're trying

And I support that. More medical schools, larger classes, etc.

I just think that the problem is less how many doctors are being put out than it is the fields they’re choosing and how they’re making their decisions. It’s not feasible for many different types of practice, but I’d like to see the larger hospital systems move more towards a Mayo-style system of teams of doctors with greater communication between the different specialists.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 11:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think there is also...

some merit in driving down the cost of medical school, both by limiting the time doctors spend in training and through other means. Perhaps doctors wouldn’t opt for specialization as often if they didn’t have such high costs to recoup.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 11:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a good point

But medical education is already largely subsidized, especially in Texas. For instance, the cost of A&M’s medical school is about $10K/yr. Most students end up taking out about $25K/yr total though, the extra money going to living expenses. Coming out of medical school with $100K in debt, the average for Texas schools, is actually much, much better than that the national averages, which are closer to $200K.

People choose specialties for more reasons than just money, many of them offer better hours/conditions in addition to the pay.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 16, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

Chinese seem to be doing it pretty well..

…though, perhaps, not as well per capita.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 1:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

In Texas at least

You don’t have to graduate from undergrad to go to medical school. You just have to take the required courses and do well enough on the MCAT. I know people who got in who don’t have an undergraduate degree.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

I mean

You have to take about 2.5 years of courses, so a lot who are motivated to spend as little time in undergrad as possible end up just finishing in the 3 years instead of dropping out. But the option is there (at least it was 5 years ago…I don’t think it’s changed).

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

The other thing is

There’s a simply ridiculous number of high school graduates who ‘want to be doctors’. I can’t imagine having to sort it out from that level, like they would in the British system. College is a pretty effective means for narrowing the field (although there are quite a few ways that pre-med programs ‘massage’ their numbers).

Let me give you an example from Baylor. They take about 4,000 students for each freshman class. Out of those 4,000 students, while I was there, about 40% (1600) declared themselves are Pre-Med their first semester. This doesn’t include Pre-Dent or Pre-PT students. After the first year, almost half of the original Pre-Med students will have dropped it (down to 800-900). By the spring of their 3rd year, when most take their MCAT, the number will be down to 400. Between the MCAT, Pre-Med Committe interview/process to obtain Letter, and further courses, only 200-250 will actually apply to medical school. Depending on the year, somewhere around 40-60% will get accepted. That’s a pretty good rate as I think the overall Texas acceptance rate is something like 25%.

So you see, there’s other factors at play. It’s not just about what you need to learn, but about trying to find the people who have the work ethic to make it through this process and theoretically have the work ethic for the intense training process to come.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

just FYI you don't need a 4 year degree to go to med school

you need “x” amount of background hors in a specific feild. There are many people in med school that did not get an undergraduate degree. The problem is that if you fail out you are stuck with all that debt and nothing to show for it.

JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook

by laxtonto on Jul 16, 2010 12:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yup

Though I wouldn’t say many people do it…it’s a pretty small minority.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 16, 2010 9:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree in a way

I’ll offer a defense; college is the best way to gain varied perspectives on issues, gain input from different groups, and figure out what the hell you want to do. It’s also a wonderful way to essentially take time off and space out while catching up on TV shows.
I can’t disagree with your primary point, however. The degree carries weight way above its real value.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 14, 2010 11:31 PM CDT reply actions  

How do you find out what you want to do in college?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

I’ll give you a couple of examples.
Going in to community college, I was inclined to get through everything as quickly and efficiently as possible, then go to law school. After a few classes which related somewhat (government, media law) and speaking to some professors I became absolutely convinced it would be disastrous for me. I don’t want to put in the time required for paperwork, maddening, tedious reading, etc.
But the media law class got me interested in radio. I transferred to UNT, began to work at the school radio station. I’ve fallen in love with broadcasting… now I work at KNTU, intern at CBS TV and am set to graduate next May with a radio, tv and film degree.
Much of what I do over the course of the next year will be redundant butt shit which does me little good. But there’s also going to be some really, really good crap in there.
To reference Emmit Smith there were some diamonds.
In the poopoo.
And you gots to dig in that poopoo and find the diamonds.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 15, 2010 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not to hijack Ben's argument, or assume too much about it,

but I think he’d argue there were alternative approaches for you to find your path that wouldn’t have involved that much time, effort, and money.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

Indeed...

approaches that might even pay you money.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

This.

I went to college (didn’t graduate, obviously).

Now, sixteen years after high school? I still don’t know what I want to do.

"I think I'm going to name my new car Scooter, because it dominates on the road." - mikeyoungfuturehof, 9.10.09
"I’ve been a Rangers fan all my life and I can tell you there’s been plenty of fucking crying in baseball…" - WhipSmart, 6.3.08

by Lisa W on Jul 15, 2010 8:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

He said

It was a good method for finding out what you want to do. I don’t recall him saying it was the only one. And I certainly don’t recall him saying he assumed that that would be the case for him; as his own story showed, he kind of bounced around into what he liked.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 12:42 PM CDT up reply actions  

He said that it was "the best way."

I think that’s a large assumption about what college will accomplish in that respect.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well

I think his perspective comes from the way he found what he likes. So maybe he’s taking his subjective experience a little too far.

But I thought that was obvious after his story.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

"Want to and can do?"

I think it was. I’m pretty sure, if I can read between the lines of his posts, that the reason it was such a good way to find out what he wanted to do was precisely because it wasn’t flitting about from tangential, low-level job to tangential, low-level job.

I mean, I think most people would agree that the theory often taught in college is much more likely to attract someone to a field than, say, drafting a letter to an attorney or making copies.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 12:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

Look.

He wrote college was the best way. I replied that there were alternatives. You retorted that those alternatives were potentially underealistic. I responded (or meant to respond) that so was assuming college is the best way to decide what you want to (or can) do. That’s my sole point, here.

I don’t know what we’re arguing about.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

x

I still think that just saying there are alternatives isn’t terribly helpful.

I agree that you shouldn’t go to college to determine what you want to do in the sense that you’re some blank slate. If you’re that clueless, then I’m fine with you delaying it.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

What would have been more helpful?

Listing the alternatives? Not useful for Conjunction, since what’s done is done. If there are people who want to ask about the alternatives, we could have that discussion ~ in fact, I think it’s already happening elsewhere here.

How helpful was it to point out that my unhelpful alternatives were potentially unrealistic?

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 1:03 PM CDT up reply actions  

There are alternatives

But It’s not as simple.
It’s tough to simply ‘volunteer’ to work at a radio station. Mostly because all of the different regulations which draw a line between slavery and education. That’s why these days, you either need connections in the industry or the ability to enlist in course credit to get the experience.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 15, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I do think it would be a decent idea

If you had to go do something else before going to college. For a year or semester or some such. I think the biggest thing lacking from most college experiences is a reminder of what the real world is like.

And, to that point, the average medical student has a year gap between undergrad and medical school. Part of that is the difficulty of getting in, but part of it is people wanting to take some time off to explore other things before getting back into the slog.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

This seems like as good a place as any to ask...

I have Jameson, Crown, and Dr. Pepper.

Does any combination of those three things normally taste good? I don’t want to waste anything.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 14, 2010 11:33 PM CDT reply actions  

Man up.

Jameson on the rocks.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 14, 2010 11:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

Who needs the rocks?

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 1:33 PM CDT up reply actions  

Touche sir.

My man card has been revoked.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 15, 2010 1:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

ha

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 3:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not sure if you could do all three

But my friend discovered that you can make incredibly strong drinks palpable to the most ardent Bartles&James drinker by adding sugar to it.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

*Adding sugar to Dr. Pepper with lots of liquor

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

?

 ?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah

Even though I like Ben, this sounds a lot like forming a conclusion from various other experiences then going out and trying to find a basis for it afterwards. There’s some truth to what he’s saying, but I think he’s drawing improper conclusions.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 10:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Perhaps because early on you had the whole

“I have a problem with authority” line. I appreciate the honesty, but it also brings into question some pretty influential biases, no?

Not that I’m unbiased. As someone who left for college early (TAMS) and is arguably getting too much education (MD/PhD), I’m probably biased the opposite way.

I think the whole in your argument is the difference between the ability of people to be successful without a college degree and the probability of it. I have some friends who I think would have been better off with the $100K as an investment in one of their business ideas than in college courses. But they are the exception, not the trend.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

Takes all kinds to make a world go 'round.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not that this should be the end all be all or anything

But I imagine it would harm our economy having another exodus of a job industry without a replacement.

by BuckyB on Jul 14, 2010 11:45 PM CDT reply actions  

College

is more than learning in textbooks and studying… Its about learning about yourself over 4 years. I cannot tell you how much Ive learned about myself living out of state in college over the past two years, and I’ll graduate early.. At the end of this next year..

100% J. Arias supporter from day 1

by miles on Jul 14, 2010 11:46 PM CDT reply actions  

Did you learn why it burns when you pee?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm still looking for an answer to this question.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jul 15, 2010 1:28 PM CDT up reply actions  

Look at miles all growed up

but you still don’t know if you could have grown outside of college. Fair point but I think Ben has an easy counter. At the very least, I doubt you could tell whether he had graduated from college

by ab03 on Jul 14, 2010 11:53 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know,

but the point is in order to get most top management positions in this country, you have to have ATLEAST an undergrad if not MS.. Fair or not, that is how this country is..

100% J. Arias supporter from day 1

by miles on Jul 14, 2010 11:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

slow down

and coast a bit noob. probably you’re last chance to for awhile.

by SteveP on Jul 15, 2010 1:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

One example. You wrote:
See, I’ve got authority issues. I don’t like people telling me what to study, or when to be someplace, or whatever. But 500 years ago, a university made a certain amount of sense: books were a luxury item, a sign of wealth; the overall educational attainment of the general populace was atrocious; long distance communication was ridiculously difficult. So it made some sense to have a central repository of learning.

But your authority issues don’t really have much to do with why it made sense to have a central repository then, and doesn’t now. In fact, your arguments against universities looking the way they do now, given the alternatives, don’t really speak against college, or show that college is for suckers.

There’s a lot of this going on in what you wrote.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 14, 2010 11:53 PM CDT reply actions  

I wrote this while answering phone calls...

over about 15 minutes, by request, so I would expect it to be somewhat disjointed.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

Fair enough ~ just as long as you realize that your arguments don't really hold together.

You’ve got about four good arguments going at once, but tying them all together like this doesn’t do any of them justice.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 14, 2010 11:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

At this time of night...

I’m still usually fairly busy. I should have waited until later, I suppose.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 14, 2010 11:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

Damn you Ben...

You write this two weeks before I’m about to graduate college?

You should go find a DeLorean, go back in time, and write this 5 years ago and save me some time and money

Matt (Denver, CO): Congratulations, I heard you won a gold glove!
Klaw (1:18 PM) : Thanks, I had a great year at the plate!
I think Jason Heyward is ready to be promoted to the AL. He’s mastered the NL - Matthew Carruth

Now Taking Suggestions for New Username

by SCDP on Jul 15, 2010 12:02 AM CDT reply actions  

Where do

you go?

100% J. Arias supporter from day 1

by miles on Jul 15, 2010 12:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

My Observations

I don’t normally post this an interesting topic. I have a Ph.D. but now work in something unrelated to my graduate work. Like others have said, the degree is a signal. I could be doing the same thing I am doing now but with an undergrad degree, but I likely would not have been hired for my current job. That being said, I think you can succeed without a degree, you just have to find a field where expertise is valued over a degree. An example would be becoming an expert on a specific software platform, like Microsoft SharePoint. You could become an expert with a high school education, but you have to dive in and work on a lot of projects and build your resume. Nobody would ever ask if you have a college degree.

by scotth on Jul 15, 2010 12:03 AM CDT reply actions  

You have sort of hit on the value of a college degree

In your example the expert on Microsoft SharePoint has a limited skillset and thus limited employment opportunities elsewhere. A person with a college degree has a broader range of knowledge that is applicable to more employment opportinities than a person without a college degree.

In my case, I have a 2yr degree with 20 years eperience in a specific field. If I lost my job I would likely have to move to find employment. If I had a BS degree I could easily find a job within 10 mikes of where I live.

by RangerMad on Jul 15, 2010 7:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Limited opportunities with SharePoint!?

Are you kidding? SharePoint developers can make up to $250\hr with no college degree. It will take some knowledge of Microsoft .NET development, but it does not require any college. The IT industry may be an exception but it is certainly one industry where college isn’t required.

Full disclosure: I’m a SharePoint admin without a single college credit to my name.

by amexpat on Jul 16, 2010 5:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Sharepoint is hardly all that complicated

I call bullshit on your 250/hr nonsense.

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 17, 2010 12:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

This thread has really taken off. I did not expect that.

"When I want my men to remember something important, to really make it stick, I give it to them double dirty."- General George S. Patton

by Aqua on Jul 15, 2010 12:08 AM CDT reply actions  

Ben knows

how to push our buttons

"If the Saints can reach the Superbowl, the Rangers can reach the World Series." - PhilKid
The Animated Ballpark in Arlington

by FirebatM3 on Jul 15, 2010 12:09 AM CDT up reply actions  

The bankruptcy protection for student loan lenders...

can’t last. Keep your eye on Devry, Apollo Group, and SLM as potential big droppers.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

Wouldn't surprise me.

I’d argue that one of the biggest problems with American education is not the role of undergraduate education, per se, but the way that it’s structured and administered.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

The only group that seems to outnumber the lawyers on LSB seems to be the the students

It makes sense, actually.

I wouldn’t trade Michael Main straight up for Bengie Molina, even if my alternate catcher was a pointed stick. - KLaw

by LSJ on Jul 15, 2010 12:11 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Because UNT

is the shit.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 16, 2010 11:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

we still need to come up with a standing place an time for a weekly UNT Rangers watching party

JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook

by laxtonto on Jul 16, 2010 11:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah!

you dicks stood me up last time….

Ah, I’m just kidding. Let’s do it this Saturday night!

"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
"HE GETS THE GODDAM CLEAT" by philkid3

by jam0152 on Jul 16, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

son't know yet about what is goign to be happening this weekend

finished summer 1 and started on an even more convoluted project that will keep me busy till mid Aug. Will try and come up with a better idea on wtf is going on this afternoon.

JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook

by laxtonto on Jul 16, 2010 1:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

I kind of disagree.

Most people who went to a shitty high school at which nobody (teachers, administration, students) was interested an any kind of critical thinking, University would be a huge advantage. Not necessarily for employment, but for the mind in general. I learned a lot in college.

Yet, there are a lot of people who leave college the same way they went in: dumb as rocks. These people aren’t interested in learning. They just want the degree.

Anyway, I agree that it doesn’t make sense to take on the sort of debt required to get an undergraduate degree. Will you make a lot more money in life with one? Maybe, maybe not. But unless you have rich parents you’re also going to be saddled with a really big debt.

What’s worse is completing half or 75 percent of a degree and then dropping out.

by Black Francis on Jul 15, 2010 12:18 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

I agree with that last sentence, specifically if you're going to be on the hook for any of the cost at some point.

If you are going to go then you better come out of there with some kind of degree/certification/something. Otherwise you’re just wasting your time/money and racking up a lot of completely unnecessary debt.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 15, 2010 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's the sunk costs fallacy.

And I disagree with you.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well most people drop out due to financial reasons, I would think

Once you’ve already gone in debt for 70 percent of the cost of a degree, I think you may as well go ahead and go through with it. By that time you’ve probably learned all that college is going to teach you (depending on what your field of study is) and if you’re on the hook for all that debt it’s very tempting to just leave. Chances are, though, that you will make more money over your lifetime having completed college, so if you’re that close it’s probably worth finishing since you’re going to be paying a shitload every month to service student loans.

If you quit one year in or even two years in, probably best to cut your losses.

Anyway, it’s sad because I think that a more well-rounded college program can benefit people if they’re interested in learning. My problem was that student loans were easy to get, my advisers were useless, and I took too many courses just because I thought they were interesting. I still took my core classes but I took many more classes within my department than I needed to and a lot of other random ones that I didn’t need. At some point it became apparent that my parents wouldn’t help me pay the money back like they promised, and it became a huge worry (and remains so almost ten years later, but that’s a different story).

I don’t feel like it was all a waste of time, but the debt is a problem. Seems to me there should be no interest on student loans AND that college should be less expensive, even if it’s at the cost of higher taxes. It shouldn’t be financially crippling because you want to take a few classes outside of your normal study. People shouldn’t take as many as I did, but most advisers would probably advise against doing that. I didn’t have that voice of reason…instead I was like a kid in a candy store and obviously I went too far.

But I can’t bring myself to argue for less education. In my business I know too many ignorant fucks. They’re not idiots…just ignorant. In my last line of work in which even the secretaries seemed to have piles of degrees, there were still a few ignorant fucks but not nearly as many. My experience is that to some extent education makes better people. Or at least makes them easier for me to tolerate.

But that’s just my experience. I see where you’re coming from with all of this and it does make a lot of sense.

by Black Francis on Jul 15, 2010 6:55 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Debt is the problem

I left college before I finished my degree (only had about 1.5 yrs left so it was dumb) and it took me years to payoff 2yrs of loans
The worst pay was trying to work fulltime to pay for my cost of living, and still trying to concentrate on school.

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 15, 2010 7:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

This, too.

Part of the reason I think I never finished college is financial.

I was accepted to every school I applied at. My parents made too much for me to get federal grants, so at the very last minute I applied to Angelo State, when it became obvious I couldn’t afford to go to my 1-4th choice schools. So, this was in…. late May. Or June. Really, really, late.

Had I gone to a school I wanted to go to, it might have been different.

"I think I'm going to name my new car Scooter, because it dominates on the road." - mikeyoungfuturehof, 9.10.09
"I’ve been a Rangers fan all my life and I can tell you there’s been plenty of fucking crying in baseball…" - WhipSmart, 6.3.08

by Lisa W on Jul 15, 2010 8:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

Point of clarification: Ben

Do you disagree that a college degree is the easiest way to get a white collar job? Even taking money, time into consideration. I know college might not be the best, but as a signaling mechanism but in our current system, it’s still the best right?

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:19 AM CDT reply actions  

Maybe.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:20 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've heard plenty of non-college grads talk about their success

but I’ve heard few say it was an easy process. There was a lot more luck involved and starting out at the bottom. Or, those people were extremely self motivated at a young age and because, of lack of resources, were forced to make a living for themselves.

On the other hand, you can literally be a dipshit who drinks all day, somehow pass your way through state school classes, and end up with a fairly good shot at some white collar job.

I’ll concede the point about school being a bad signalling mechanism (at least with these examples) but I think it’s a really really bold statement to say that not going to college is easier than going. I’d strongly disagree – even taking into consideration debt. There are still plenty of cheap colleges out there.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't say easier.

With reason. I think there is a right way to do things and the wrong way to do things, and what we’re doing currently is the wrong way. I will acknowledge that the right way to do things is not always the easiest way to do things.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's not my question

It’s more for someone who just graduated high school. You aren’t suggesting that they would have more success not going to college, are you?

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm not complicating the issue.

I think that this definition of success is a limited one. And I think it really depends on the jobs people are interested in. I think there are industries ~ and not just blue-collar industries ~ in which it’d make more sense for some people not to go to college, and educate themselves while working entry-level jobs, in order to get the sorts of jobs they want down the line.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:38 AM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

The problem is that we’re expecting an 18 year old kid to know what he wants to do 10 years in the future, and to borrow heavily to finance it.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the industries where it doesn't make sense

vastly outnumber the ones where it does. And I think college is probably the best place to help you decide what you want to do.

If this is an issue about growing up, I’m not sure I wouldn’t rather be in college taking Art Appreciation than being an IT tech (or whatever I could get at 18 without a diploma)

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Fair enough

And I don’t really have a problem with delaying college to figure out if you want to do something that doesn’t require college. My only concern would be that your exposure to doing something that requires college would be so limited if you didn’t actually go to college.

Maybe it’s not a valid concern anymore with the internet. But there are still stories of students being inspired at school by some random professor when they took Chemistry because it was required. Is that worth the $40K in debt to possibly have that moment? Maybe not – but I think if I had the resources and any sort of assurance that I’d eventually pay it back, I’d like to find out

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hated school.

I love learning though. When I have children, I’m not sure that I’ll be encouraging them to spend 4 or 5 years partying and puking up someone’s panties in the hopes they have that experience you’re talking about.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

So don't encourage them to do that.

Your indictment of college is too broad. There’s still a role for universities and undergraduate programs at them. There’s also a huge need to re-imagine higher education, here and elsewhere.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

In seriousness

I might delay my children’s college because I was probably not mature enough to go and really take advantage.

But I seriously don’t know how my son would ever become an astronomer if he didn’t go to college. Like not just learning astronomy, but knowing that he wanted to be one. Maybe internet, but doubtful

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think the argument would run the other way.

He could probably figure out he wanted to be an astronomer without going to college, but without some sort of higher educational system ~ whether centralized or not ~ he’d have a hell of a time actually becoming one.

This is where I have a problem with the mixed arguments.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

A lot of the agitation which resulted in...

the CRU email release and shed some light on the climate debate came from people formally untrained in climate science. And there’s a lot of serious discussion being generated by these same people, untrained in climate science.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

What's your point, though?

How much quality research on climate has been produced by people formally untrained in climate-related science?

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 7:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well...

since “any” is more than “none,” and the discussion above was whether a person uneducated to be an astronomer could be an astronomer, I was just making the point that sticking feathers in one’s ass does not make one a chicken.

Many of the NEO’s identified are identified by amateur astronomers.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 11:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would say "none"

in answer to my question. And identifying an NEO doesn’t make you an astronomer. The fact that you had to add the modifier “amateur” says a lot.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 11:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

But the answer is not "none."

Question: what was the precipitating event for the FOI which eventually caused the CRU scandal?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Papers published by Steve McIntyre...

a non-credentialed climate researcher. Many of the emails discuss his ongoing sparring matches with the CRU group, and how to get journals to not publish his work and to delegitimize his papers.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

Oh, please.

Steve McIntyre is your example? The guy with the BS in math, who was admitted to MIT (though declined)?

And can you point me to quality climate science research that he’s done? Not just critique of other people’s statistical methods ~ because he’s credentialed to do that, after all ~ but peer-reviewed climate research?

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:16 PM CDT up reply actions  

We are talking about credentialing.

If Steve McIntyre, as an uncredentialed “climate researcher,” can cause this many waves in climate science, I think that does back up my point to an extent.

Additionally, the climate community’s response to McIntrye from the get-go highlights some of the problems with tenure-track, credentialing, and the insularity of the academic community.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

No.

Again, McIntyre had a coauthor with a PhD in economics, who specializes in environmental economics. And McIntyre himself is not “an uncredentialed climate researcher”; he is very much credentialed in mathematics, and that’s exactly where his critique originated.

Furthermore, the climate community’s response to McIntyre says nothing about your original arguments about credentialing, or even tenure. About academia and its politics? Yes. But we didn’t need McIntyre to tell us that.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

He is credentialed with a B.S.

Not a Ph.D., and not in the field with which he was butting heads.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:40 PM CDT up reply actions  

False dichotomies.

He was butting heads over the statistical analysis, which is is related to (if not exactly) the field he’s credentialed in. He also studied philosophy, economics, and politics ~ the latter two directly related to his analysis of the published evidence ~ at Oxford.

What’s more, your original point was about undergrad degrees, and I don’t see the reason you’re now drawing a distinction between undergrad and graduate here.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

How is a person

“formally untrained”? :)

Much of the GW debate is not on the science but on the statistical analysis.

by RangerMad on Jul 15, 2010 12:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Not formally trained, then.

Let’s move off the semantics.

How many folks involved in those debates in any productive, substantive sense are untrained and uncredentialled in mathematics or statistics? How may are doing quality research on climate science?

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:23 PM CDT up reply actions  

Also, it's worth noting

that McIntyre’s co-author on his influential papers, Ross McKitrick, has a PhD in economics, and specializes in environmental economics and policy.

Hardly uncredentialled or untrained.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:25 PM CDT up reply actions  

The problem with delaying college

is you go straight into being an adult. You get adult bills. Lets say you find a wife and y’all start a family. Now you are working entry level or slightly above trying to support a family AND you want to find time to go back to college. Sure you can do it a class or two at a time while you work, and it’s better than nothing, but it takes forever.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 8:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Not really

You don’t think about those loans but once a year (when you have to reapply for them), and you certainly don’t make payments on them.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 12:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a decision that will literally affect

the rest of your life, financially if not otherwise. And I certainly can’t agree that I didn’t think about those loans but once a year. That’s far, far from the truth for me and an awful lot of my friends in undergrad.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

You're probably

More mature than most kids, because I think BuckyB’s assessment is much more universal.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 12:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know.

My parents made sure I was aware of how much I was taking on, and what it meant. Maybe that’s rare.

The fact that many 18-year olds don’t realize how big a decision taking on those loans will be seems analogous to other 18-year olds not realizing that not going to college means getting “adult bills” and that there are constraints that come with starting a family.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:59 PM CDT up reply actions  

One thing

High school is nothing like college. High school teachers suck hard for so many reasons. College professors might not always be engaged but they are so much better than those powertripping assholes. I don’t think many college professors care that they have power over their students.

Completely different dynamic

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

Completely different dynamic...yes

but to say that many college professors don’t care that they have power over their students is not something I really agree with. This power just manifests itself differently. Whether through textbooks, or some other required consumption of time.

High school presents itself in a vastly different environment due to the age of the students and the legalities that creates. Having a student body of legal minors places a different set of burdens on the faculty. Creating a different teacher/student dynamic.

People who aren’t very good at what they do can be found everywhere. In education or elsewhere, in professions requiring degrees and those that do not

College professors might not always be engaged but they are so much better than those powertripping assholes.

Plenty of powertripping assholes in both places, plenty of good people both places too.

by Cav0 on Jul 15, 2010 1:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Do you think that I haven't been to college?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 1:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

What an annoying question

Just say you’ve been to college then. And be more accurate in your assessments. I couldn’t give a shit.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 5:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see how it's an annoying question.

Hardly more annoying than condescendingly telling me how college and high school instructors are so different.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 7:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

And anecdotally.

Although maybe ab03 has done a systematic survey of college professors that measures the amount they care about holding power over their students.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 10:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well then don't be so wrong

And talk about high school teachers being anything close to college teachers when they aren’t

by ab03 on Jul 16, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

When did I say that?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 16, 2010 11:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

That sort of hindsight would be invaluable.

It’s the sort of thing that certain universities can, to some extent, guarantee. The vast majority of them probably can’t, though.

And for an awful lot of people, that gamble looks even worse because of their immediate circumstances.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

College is for suckers

I’m not going to read your post, but I am assuming it is something like, “you write a check to get a piece of paper.”

Well in my case, having gone to college, I have been able to expand my networking base with professionals in their respective industries, and my fraternity (which I am sure you hate more than college) has allowed me to further that base of job hunting and get me into my preferred industries right out of college.

Could I have done this with my HS diploma? Maybe, sure. Would it have taken longer than 4 years to develop the types of connections and job possibilities I have now? I guarantee it.

I am about to graduate after this year, and I have 4 job offers in the field I want to go into, in four different cities (DFW, SF, NY, ATX) and each has a salary starting at 60,000+. I’m not bragging, I’m making the point that I wouldn’t have this out of high school. I could have gotten there eventually, but not in four years. Sure it cost my parents a ton of cash, but I am better off for it. There is 11% unemployment, to be in my position is a direct result of my university education. No doubt.

Not to mention I met my beautiful future wife whose father is LOADED! Seriously, I wont say what he does, but he is one of the biggest names in the actuary business… Dude is crazy…

And finally, I wouldn’t have had the pleasure of knowing Parker French, my gf’s brother who is being heavily scouted by the Rangers and is coming up here the first week of August for their invitational camp. Too bad he committed to UT, he is def going to school.

So ya, I disagree with the value. But ya, you pay for a piece of paper. But in my case, the paper means nothing, the value of my education is much broader.

"Hey Sanka, you can pee now... uuummm, too late...."
This used to be links to my websites... But the man got in the way, shut them all down... Damn the man...
Rangers Game Streams ~ Password: LSB123

by FormerLSBUser on Jul 15, 2010 12:26 AM CDT reply actions  

If you're not going to read the post....

don’t bother replying.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Hows the beer store

"Hey Sanka, you can pee now... uuummm, too late...."
This used to be links to my websites... But the man got in the way, shut them all down... Damn the man...
Rangers Game Streams ~ Password: LSB123

by FormerLSBUser on Jul 15, 2010 12:27 AM CDT up reply actions  

Chugging along.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't know whether or not your serious abou that...

…but if you are, I think you’re on the right track. Even though my business is struggling mightily right now, I’m convinced going into business for yourself is the only way to be happy. Well, for a lot of people, anyway. Everyone’s different. I sense that you’re the type that would enjoy it, and hopefully succeed in it.

by Black Francis on Jul 15, 2010 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

There's a lot of hurdles to clear...

because of the capital requirements. But anything worth doing is worth doing correctly, so I don’t mind spending the time to make it happen right.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

What's your business?

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

He cleans up after himself a lot.

"I don't really like pitchers." - Nelson Cruz

by AceJC on Jul 15, 2010 9:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Same business

as Tony Soprano

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

At the very least

We got to read a post in which PM scoreboarded all of us.
Damn you and your networking base!

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 15, 2010 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah...

what’s funny is he’s scoreboarding us while aknowledging that he hasn’t entered the workforce yet.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Just a general question

I used to work at the JCC, everyone thinks I am Jewish, and I love jew jokes(those that are PG-13 or better), how do you feel?

"Hey Sanka, you can pee now... uuummm, too late...."
This used to be links to my websites... But the man got in the way, shut them all down... Damn the man...
Rangers Game Streams ~ Password: LSB123

by FormerLSBUser on Jul 15, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've built up

a great deal resistance to the R-rated ones, so fire away :P
Generally, the most vile, preverse stuff you’ll hear about a culture comes from within. It’s easier to dissect that which you know.
What’d you do at the JCC? I used to play little league baseball there.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 15, 2010 11:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

Camp Coordinator

and life guard… And, watcher of asses of slowly degrading jewish women.

"Hey Sanka, you can pee now... uuummm, too late...."
This used to be links to my websites... But the man got in the way, shut them all down... Damn the man...
Rangers Game Streams ~ Password: LSB123

by FormerLSBUser on Jul 16, 2010 12:34 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, I'm sorry

The JCC trend toward an older crowd.

http://oursaviorchuck.ytmnd.com/

by Conjunction on Jul 16, 2010 5:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Networking is the fancy term for the good ol' boy system.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:51 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

They all fall in the range of

Corporate communication management —> Sports Information Director

Depends on which job, but each falls in this area.

"Hey Sanka, you can pee now... uuummm, too late...."
This used to be links to my websites... But the man got in the way, shut them all down... Damn the man...
Rangers Game Streams ~ Password: LSB123

by FormerLSBUser on Jul 15, 2010 10:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

A bunch

One of which was organized crime, which interestingly is taught by a guy named Patrick Kinkade, brother of the famous painter Kinkade.

"Hey Sanka, you can pee now... uuummm, too late...."
This used to be links to my websites... But the man got in the way, shut them all down... Damn the man...
Rangers Game Streams ~ Password: LSB123

by FormerLSBUser on Jul 16, 2010 12:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Interesting.

I would’ve figured the soc courses might’ve given you pause as your wrote your post, but I guess not.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 16, 2010 5:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

That was a litlle obnoxious

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 7:01 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Ugh.

The joys of graduating in December. I’m walking into one of the worst markets in years, with an accounting and financial management degree. My parents won’t get off the apply for jobs or grad school. I can’t get help from my own school on what to do about spicing up my resume or figure out the damn p.o.s GRE website. I’ve felt like college was another form of high school. I’ve worked since I was 15 and have held a steady job except for my first semester.

College has become what a high school diploma was 25-40 years ago, now you almost need a master’s to differentiate yourself, but you risk the label of “you did grad school cause you were afraid of the real world shit.”

Needless to say at 21 the whole systems infuriates the hell out of me.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:30 AM CDT reply actions  

I know a lot of people with master's...

who sit not too far from where I sit. Doing the same job (or a more entry level one).

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:31 AM CDT up reply actions  

So a Masters is not worth the time?

I have no clue what I want to do. I know I don’t want to do accounting, mainly tax or auditing(which I take this coming semester). All along I wanted to get my MBA, hence why I chose accounting and finance as a solid background. Now I feel like I wasted 3.5 years and $50,000 trying to gain ground, while feeling like I only lost ground.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

ha ha...

I don’t think any of them are worth the time or money. I say get a job and find out what you want to do. Then, if the jobs you want require something more, then do more.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know I want to wind up in sports,

hence my internship here at home with the College Baseball Foundation. I wanted to get my master’s in sports management, but have all but talked myself out of that, by peers and people I’ve worked with. I thought about Law school, for 2 seconds, then realized the LSAT and law school would kick what’s left of my ass, from what undergrad didn’t already kick. School is a drag, most of my friends have the luxury of the family business so their job is secure or they have connections. My dad is railroader and my mom works at an insurance office, as they commonly say I have no connections.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Google "law school scam blog"

Read some opposing views before deciding to go to law school

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

I have no desire.

I know it opens doors and all that b.s, for someone my age I’m way too cynical, which isn’t good when looking the barrel of a shitty job market.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 12:47 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd def wait for the market, fwiw

That being said, law school opens some ridiculously lucrative opportunities if you can do well enough grade-wise.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 7:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

maybe.

I don’t know. I don’t think I’ve done anything that anyone else couldn’t do. Read Liar’s Poker. Credentialing has been bullshit for a long time.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've read it

and I feel like every major profession has someone claiming something similar. I run into lawyers saying the same thing.

The easy retort is that there would be more people like you if you weren’t the exception. There are too many people that can’t afford a college education that wouldn’t have gotten one if they had any success without one.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

According to Millionaire Next Door...

college degrees and those types of credentials are not as well represented among the truly wealthy as you would think.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

Probably not

But are we all so ambitious?

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe not.

I don’t know.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

I mean

I consider myself a smart guy (surprise!) but not necessarily all that diligent. If I didn’t go to college, I can’t imagine the amount of work I would have had to do to get to a job that I could live with (and obviously it would be nothing to do with law).

So again, in this system, I don’t see how I could advocate to anyone not to go to school.

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why do you think it would not have anything to do with the law?

Paralegals make good money (I made good money when I did it), and you do just about everything a lawyer does but make court appearances.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 12:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's really not "just about everything"

That’s experience as a paralegal and a summer associate (maybe one rung above paralegal but a pretty big rung).

by ab03 on Jul 15, 2010 12:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

I worked in small offices...

and in my experience, it was just about everything.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 1:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

Nope

maybe in a small office yes, because the work is very simple. But in a big firm, simply not the case. That is based on 8+ years in a big firm.

by thedudeabides on Jul 16, 2010 10:40 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's a stupid assumption

I know of two very small firms who get some pretty big, complex cases. That is based on working against those bastards for OAG.

by Black Francis on Jul 16, 2010 6:39 PM CDT up reply actions  

In the case of litigation

you are correct that the cases can be big and complex, but I wasn’t thinking of a boutique litigation shop. I am transactional, and I guess I had that in mind. The point, however, remains the same, in the small firm you suggest, a legal assistant is not doing lawyer work. The fact is a legal assistant or summer associate has a poor view of what lawyers do (and in my view LAs probably have a better view than SAs).

by thedudeabides on Jul 16, 2010 6:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

The small offices I worked in...

were family law litigation firms.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 16, 2010 11:44 PM CDT up reply actions  

Figured that

big firm LAs tend to have an associate degree and legal assistant clerks a 4 year degree from a top college. That is the reason for the assumption I made above (which I believe was perfectly rational). The fact is you are correct that you can do much of the work of a lower level lawyer (and with superior experience you can probably do it better than a baby lawyer). When I buy or sell dirt I rely on the landmen almost completely to take care of recording deeds etc., the process is a black box to me. Still, at some point that is no longer the case.

by thedudeabides on Jul 21, 2010 9:25 AM CDT up reply actions  

I should also say

That due diligence or doc review can be done by a smart LA (who has been educated about privilege and attorney work product) but once you get above a 3rd year, no.

by thedudeabides on Jul 16, 2010 6:54 PM CDT up reply actions  

I think you're underestimating what you've done.

And what others have been/are prepared to do. But that’s less a defense of college than an indictment of the American primary and secondary educational system.

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 12:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

Department of Defense is finishing up their movement from

using soldiers to all civilians for finance. Look into usajobs.gov . Consistent raises and a great retirement package.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks I may look into that.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 11:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

DoD

Talk about job security. You have to try pretty hard to get fired once you are entrenched there.

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 7:04 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

with my non-college educated friends from high school as a reference

there’s no question that a college education remains a bargain.

by SteveP on Jul 15, 2010 1:35 AM CDT reply actions  

That has not been my experience.

"I think I'm going to name my new car Scooter, because it dominates on the road." - mikeyoungfuturehof, 9.10.09
"I’ve been a Rangers fan all my life and I can tell you there’s been plenty of fucking crying in baseball…" - WhipSmart, 6.3.08

by Lisa W on Jul 15, 2010 8:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

Just my small opinion

The argument here to me seems to be primarily an indictment of the post-secondary education system. Which is certainly worth discussing, however its not going away and if it did unemployment would go up and we have enough of that already. The opinion college is for suckers seems to be oversimplifying Ben’s point.

In one of the many comments up there Ben says bq. I don’t think any of them are worth the time or money. I say get a job and find out what you want to do. Then, if the jobs you want require something more, then do more.

So if there job requires a college degree surely that person isn’t a sucker. There are so many ways to achieve “success” in today’s world that to attempt to marginalize any one way is silly. For every person who didn’t advance in the job market with their college degree someone else did. For someone who found success without formal education or training there is someone else that didn’t.

Just as an anecdote, my brother didn’t really want to go to college and so didn’t and has played the job game for over 10 years and never settled on anything and is still in the same rut being supported a lot by our parents (which I am too while I’m in college, there’s an 8 year difference in our ages). Who’s to say it would have been better had he gone to college? Not me. Might it have been? Sure. Am I better off having gone to college? For the moment compared to my brother, yes. Will it always be that way? Who knows.

No person has an easy answer to how to find “success” in there lives. So I feel to broadly say “college is for suckers” is silly. However, I’m in college so my opinion is admittedly biased.

by Cav0 on Jul 15, 2010 1:38 AM CDT reply actions  

There are some papers...

I’ve seen that put dollar figures on degree value. Essentially you have to run an IRR on the money spent and establish a baseline opportunity cost. I’ll dig around and see if I can find them.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 1:49 AM CDT up reply actions  

My air just went out

Does anybody have a degree in “Fuck my life there is a heat advisory today”?

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 15, 2010 3:20 AM CDT reply actions  

Fuck degrees.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 3:43 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

It's going to feel like 105 DEGREES

DEGREES ARE FUCKING IMPORTANT IN THIS CASE, BEN.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 15, 2010 3:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're a celsuis man, eh?

I wouldn’t trade Michael Main straight up for Bengie Molina, even if my alternate catcher was a pointed stick. - KLaw

by LSJ on Jul 15, 2010 4:09 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Celsius is also measured in degrees, LSJ.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 4:11 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

Well don't I look silly.

I wouldn’t trade Michael Main straight up for Bengie Molina, even if my alternate catcher was a pointed stick. - KLaw

by LSJ on Jul 15, 2010 5:36 AM CDT up reply actions  

A little

But I appreciate the laugh. Try “Kelvin” next time (learned that lil der tidbit of knowledge with my degree!)

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 7:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

So Ben...

What do you do for work?

Are you set? I mean, you like and do alright in the job, and you’re good for the long term?

Go Strangers.

by hightowersmith on Jul 15, 2010 5:40 AM CDT reply actions  

I am a stock broker.

There are elements of the job that I really like (talking to clients, learning about portfolio management especially), and there are parts that I really can’t stand (working for a faceless corporation).

It’s allowed me to accumulate some capital, and I’m working on using that capital to do something else.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 6:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

This is my ultimate endgame.

One day I will work for myself.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 15, 2010 11:13 AM CDT up reply actions  

I hope not for Jones or ML

but the point is college gets you from retail to Ibanking, and that is $. I would agree that ECMH is crap, and you can learn what you need from security analysis and Buffett’s writings as well as Bernstien, Greenblatt etc., the financial industry is one that I would argue is the best example of your point. I’ll take a GED with 30 years of experience over an MBA.

by thedudeabides on Jul 16, 2010 7:06 PM CDT up reply actions  

You trying to start a revolution here Che?

Luckily my wife’s job pays for my education…..but yeah, I think it’s bullshit that I have to get a masters degree just so I can a) sit for a licensing exam, which when I pass I become a counseling intern…Once a counseling intern I have to do 4000 hours of supervised practice before I am able to hang a shingle and practice on my own.

4000 hours of supervision >>>>>>> masters

Make the licensing exam harder or something….bah.

Stupid.

"Sometimes you just want to sit back and watch somebody throw 100." - Jeff Passan on Neftali Feliz

"Baseball's all that's real" - JB

by Ryin A on Jul 15, 2010 6:18 AM CDT reply actions  

Your wife's job

pays for…your education.

That’s a new one by me. Those are some damn good benefits.

I’ve heard of health care covering the whole family, but I don’t make the same connection with education benefits.

Go Strangers.

by hightowersmith on Jul 15, 2010 6:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, she's a RN....works for the Presby system....

they will pay for the ol’ spouse’s education if it is clinical in nature.

"Sometimes you just want to sit back and watch somebody throw 100." - Jeff Passan on Neftali Feliz

"Baseball's all that's real" - JB

by Ryin A on Jul 15, 2010 6:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

They have to make sure you're not implementing...

“molestation therapy.” Or “rape therapy.”

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 6:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pears

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 10:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

LPC, Licensed Professional Counselor…don’t know what population I want to work with though, reckon it’s the next step…or just an ongoing, ever changing one.

"Sometimes you just want to sit back and watch somebody throw 100." - Jeff Passan on Neftali Feliz

"Baseball's all that's real" - JB

by Ryin A on Jul 15, 2010 8:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I thought

it was 3000 hours (1500 direct, face-to-face client time and 1500 administrative/non-direct)? Have they upped it?

by Fooster7 on Jul 18, 2010 9:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

So, I'm piggybacking on ab03's credentialling argument, but I still don't really understand Ben's response

In your system where individuals (a) obtain educations online and/or (b) immediately enter graduate school and/or © immedately enter the field to gain practical experience….

(a) How do employers distinguish between applicants?

(b) How do grad schools distinguish? Why would people choose to become a teacher over a doctor if it took the same number of years?

(c ) Again, how do employers distinguish?

It seems to me like this would turn into an elitist, family-entitled system like we were in a couple hundred years ago. If your parents knew the right people, you’d get into the profession you wanted, or the grad school you wanted. There are aspects of that today (and always will be), but it’s diminished by the ability of students to work their asses off in undergrad and earn their way into a better grad school.

If your response is high school grades should dictate, I think you are punishing kids for a poor work ethic before they’re mature enough to know better in most cases.

I guess I’m saying I don’t see the solution that you’d suggest.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 7:56 AM CDT reply actions  

Yep

companies like clear cut guidelines, and a college degree is a reasonable first cut to say that the applicant was able to conform to the system for 4 years and get a degree, and they have transcripts to suggest how well they did in the system.

I can’t see the big companies getting away from that anytime soon.

If you want to be a high school drop out, and start your own company, their is nothing that stops you, but if your plan is to work for a large company, expect to face some credentialing system and some fairly arbitrary hurdles.

Personally, I believe a lot of degrees, especially liberal arts ones, probably don’t have much real value to the companies grabbing them, but I can see why, when given the choice between people with them and without them, why companies take the person with them. It just shows, if nothing else, that the person was able to complete a degree and work within a system.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 8:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

There's room for information asymmetry there.

Let’s say you want to have a workforce, let’s say programmers. Your competition is hiring only programmers with degrees. You have a one year in-house job training program for your programmers, no degree required (as a matter of fact, let’s say no ddegree preferred). You then have a cheaper workforce, and little issue with few retention problems because your competitors require degrees.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

What certification system?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

Job training != certification

Credentialing and job training are two separate things.

For instance, most likely the day after you pass the bar, if someone came up to you and asked you to handle a moderately complicated divorce case, filing to filing, you wouldn’t be able to do it. Your j.d. is credentialing, but it doesn’t make you a lawyer. You’ll have to actually, you know, do some lawyering for that.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see why they couldn't be the same thing.

And your example is correct only if I had nothing to do with divorce cases while in school (which I don’t).

But there are areas in which I have a lot more experience and for which I’m getting paid. You’re always going to suck at the start of your entry into a profession, no matter what the credentialing or training.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

They could be the same thing.

But they are not. I wouldn’t object to college, specifically, if it were training people to do jobs.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

I said I didn't object to engineering programs.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think your problem

Is just with liberal arts and business programs.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

I think my problem...

is with the higher education system in general.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Or the idea that

An understanding of fundamentals is useful when learning more advanced and practical topics.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:43 AM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't dispute that.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 11:01 AM CDT up reply actions  

Depends on the field

CPA’s and actuaries are a bit different from that.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Except what happens IRL

is yet another company starts up, hires non college grads, doesn’t incur the cost of a training program and poaches from you and freerides.

I’m not sure you’ll get payback on your training program.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 9:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's what brokerage companies do...

TD Ameritrade pays for noobs to get their licenses, and then once they get their licenses, they jump to Fidelity or TIA Kreff.

But it apparently works.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Don't they also have

a glass celing at some point where you need a degree for further promotion?

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 9:12 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep. Generally Grade 12, though exceptions are made.

But my point is that apparently there is some economic benefit to it, since companies do it.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:16 AM CDT up reply actions  

As long as policies like that are in place

I’m not sure college is for suckers.

Now, if all companies were to renounce policies like that, then college might truly be a sucker’s bet.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

It's a sucker's bet...

to the extent that Grade 12 postiions in a large corporate environment are not going to most people, so if you’re paying $40 – $50k for a 1 in 1000 chance of an upper management position, that’s an expensive lottery ticket.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

You're going to be screwed.
Let’s say you want to have a workforce, let’s say programmers. Your competition is hiring only programmers with degrees. You have a one year in-house job training program for your programmers, no degree required (as a matter of fact, let’s say no ddegree preferred). You then have a cheaper workforce, and little issue with few retention problems because your competitors require degrees.

A lot of this is probably specific to programming, since the computer industry is still extremely fast-moving technology wise, but I can’t see that working. If your programmers are primarily getting their education and training through you, I think your company is going to be outmatched by competitors hiring programmers with outside exposure to newer and/or different languages and approaches, who will know/figure out how to do things in faster, easier, and in more maintainable ways. All-internal-training sounds an awful lot like stagnation to me, and there aren’t many tech companies that can get away with stagnation.

And the retention rate for CS undergrads tends to be pretty terrible, IIRC. So you’re probably going to burn through a ton of candidates who won’t even satisfactorily make it through your training program.

There are still an awful lot of jobs out there where there are enough candidates for jobs, and enough competence required for those jobs, that degrees will remain useful (on the whole) filtering mechanisms for companies. A degree at least guarantees a certain level of skill in basic areas, and a certain willingness to work through bureaucratic BS (it would be nice if the latter wasn’t a requirement, but it seems pretty hard to avoid).

Many (most?) liberal arts/business-type degrees are probably not worth much from a strict, are-they-needed-to-do-the-job, point of view, but even there I think a large-scale elimination of college requirements is unlikely. When it comes to individuals making it without college degrees, it can certainly be done, and for many jobs probably indeed at lower cost (especially compared to people going to private school) but on the larger scale from an employer perspective the reduction of barriers to entry, artificial or not, doesn’t seem like a usable solution to a surplus of applicants.

by Closure GT on Jul 15, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Okay, you're a large employer in DFW.

You post a 40k/year job, and get 200 resumes, all of which are recent graduates of UTA. How do you decide between applicants? How does anyone decide between applicants?

How do grad schools distinguish? Probably through standardized testing, or some kind of work-referral.

If you think the system we have no isn’t an eli\tist, family-entitled system then I don’t know where you’re living.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

You see which applicants have excelled in an environment where you have to work hard to get ahead

on bell curves and what not.

Standardized testing is a flawed system because it will often reward intelligent people who are miserably poor workers. A standardized test merely demonstrates 2-3 months of interest in a profession. Pre-med classes demonstrate a couple years of dedication just to get into med school.

The system will always be somewhat elitist, but students can work their asses off to earn scholarships and better grades in the current system.

I’m not sure how a high school student without any ability to proclaim their abilities as a working adult is supposed to distinguish themselves from the wealthy kid who knows people in your system.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

xxx

“I’m not sure how a high school student without any ability to proclaim their abilities as a working adult is supposed to distinguish themselves from the wealthy kid who knows people in your system.”

And that’s different from the high school student going to UTA and the legacy Yale student… umm… how?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

A UTA student can quite often distinguish himself from a legacy Yale student if she/he works for it

All things being equal, both kids working as diligently, obviously the legacy Yale student will go farther; that’s why I said elitism will always exist to an extent.

But if you don’t think the UTA student has an opportunity to surpass the legacy Yale student in terms of success, I’d say you’re wrong; it happens quite often.

Not only that, but you’re pointing to maybe 2% of the population [figure pulled out of ass] with your example of legacy students. In your system, who your parents know seems like it would be the primary indicator of the likelihood of success of an individual.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

I've heard the arguement,

that under-grads who enter graduate school, without work experience lack the edge, that most with under-grad do. I’ve been told that and I’ve worked for the past 6 years easily.

Genesis 1: 3-4 (Rangers Edition)
And JD said "Let there be Lee," and there was Lee. And JD saw the Lee, that it was good: and JD divided the Rangers from the Angels. by Aquaman56 on Jul 9, 2010 9:43 PM CDT
"Josey drives to games??? I always assumed he rides in on his high horse" jam0152
"dirkatron has his own evaluation metric: rapes above replacement." AJM

by RangersSD on Jul 15, 2010 11:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

generally

It is better to get a college degree. But, people need to be smart with what degree they get and what their expectations are.

by RangerMad on Jul 15, 2010 8:03 AM CDT reply actions  

College is for

 having sex with a bunch of different people, learning a few things about yourself and the world around you, and feeling entitled to a well-paying job once you’re out.

I don’t see anything wrong with those things.

"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
"HE GETS THE GODDAM CLEAT" by philkid3

by jam0152 on Jul 15, 2010 8:49 AM CDT reply actions  

You don't see anything wrong...

with a 22-23 yo with no work experience feeling entitled to a well paying job?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well-paying is pretty subjective.

Most people my age have never made much of anything.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 8:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Why limit it to just 22-23yo?

Many teens to early 20s don’t realize that good paying jobs require the building of a career regardless if they have a degree or not.

by RangerMad on Jul 15, 2010 9:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

As opposed to 18 yr olds feeling entitled to a well paying job?

It’s not the education that gives the current generation a sense of entitlement, it’s the ridiculous standard of living in our country

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:07 AM CDT up reply actions  

I never thought I was entitled to a well-paying job...

The person I was responding to said college is for feelign entitled to a well-paying job when you get out. I think that’s bullshit. Get a job, suck it up, TNSTAFL.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:10 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yeah, it's hard for me to stand behind this argument

I have a sense of an entitlement.

But shit, law school was a lot of work while I watched all my buddies were partying.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

Entitled to what?

Tell me what pay you’re entitled to?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:17 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'm gonna be pissed if I don't get a job, basically

I’d say if I’m not making at least 60k this time next year, I’ll be pretty frustrated/shocked. The ceiling being 160k.

But I’m hoping to work for the DOJ, so we’re probably looking more towards the bottom end :)

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well, not knowing anything about your situation...

and knowing what the situation is at biglaw right now, I think we can pretty much discount $160k out of hand. You realize that starting salaries for attorneys are pretty bimodal, right? You’ve got a median of like $80k but most of the salaries are bunched around 40k and 160k, right?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

See, to me

40k is more than fine, but then I have comparatively little debt.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:28 AM CDT up reply actions  

No, Brett!

FIGHT WITH ME!

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's exactly how it is.

Average starting salary is very deceptive. You either make a shitload, or hardly anything (when student loan debt is factored in). I am of the “poor” variety.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

I know.

~$800 a month ain’t cheap. But in good news: I recently cracked $100,000! No longer 6 figures!

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

I can't imagine that + a mortgage.

sheesh.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's why I live in a one bedroom apartment.

I looked at real estate within my budget a couple of years ago, like condos and townhomes and stuff…decided it wasn’t worth it and stayed where I am.

Oh well, none of the ladies I bring home complain. Boom.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Before this summer

I’ve probably never made more than $800 a month.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Me either until I graduated law school.

But all my jobs were shit like “lifeguard” and “Starbucks Barista.” I went straight from undergrad to law school.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well me too

Which is why it’s a bit misleading, but still.

Damn.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 10:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

I went straight through as well

My current clerkship just finally gave me enough lines to bump my 5 years of experience at Circuit City off my resume

It’s a good day.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 10:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

I took a second law job this summer

Just to get my pizza delivery off. It’s been worth having no days and nights.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 10:06 AM CDT up reply actions  

Haha yeah

I should have left it off in the first place, but a 3/4 page resume looks lame.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

Heh

I was trying to find a second job, not for resume purposes, but for Billz. Second job being “waiter.” FML.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I wish I could

But I couldn’t agree more that law students are an entitled bunch.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

You met many first year med students?

Holy crap do they think they are the best shit on earth. Way worse than law students.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

So true.

We had a girl convinced she was going to do pediatric cardiothoracic surgery. She didn’t make it 8 months.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:32 AM CDT up reply actions  

I do realize that

I’m lucky enough to be in position to have a decent shot at one of those big firms (not sure it’s worth it).

If you’re talking about a lower tiered law school, then I agree with you that it will often turn out to be a waste of money.

At SMU, however, using rough estimates from knowledge of my friends, I’d say at least 10% of the class most years (more like 7-8% right now) will be able to start at around 140-160k. That doesn’t include their 2L summer internship, which pays out 3k per week for 6-12 weeks (cutting significantly into your loans).

I’d say 15% start at 80-140k. 33% will be able to nab an 60k job. I have no idea what the stats are past that, but I will throw out that probably 3-5% of the students are already millionaires not seeking jobs. Either way, that’s a lottery ticket worth taking for a lot of people.

And many of the students who don’t make it into the 33% area are not working very hard.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:39 AM CDT up reply actions  

You think...

That over 50% of the SMU law school class get jobs at over $60k?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

You know about the $3500 stipends...

for the SMU law grad “test drives,” right?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:45 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep

I benefitted from one this summer at great paying law firm that I now have a good shot at receiving a job offer from.

You can’t use a 2-year period of down economy as a basis for your argument. Literally 2 summers ago, 2L’s at my school were getting summer clerkships with relative ease.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

Hey, I hope it works out for you.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

Thanks

And, I’m looking forward to your beer store opening with an LSB discount.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 9:59 AM CDT up reply actions   2 recs

That seems like a stretch.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

I agree.

I think it’s generous. I think it’s more likely that 50% of the law class of 2010 will have jobs paying at least $60,000 by November, 2012. That will be 2 years since becoming licensed.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't see anything wrong with a person with a degree

expecting to make enough to pay for their college loans and their living expenses.

"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
"HE GETS THE GODDAM CLEAT" by philkid3

by jam0152 on Jul 15, 2010 9:14 AM CDT up reply actions  

And if they can't, I suppose it was a bad investment.

But the market determines what a college graduate is worth, not the college graduate’s sense of entitlement.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Speaking of entitlement...

John Derbyshire (who is not one of my normal reads, btw) has a term “labor-virgins,” for those that have never had to do any “dirty work.”

http://article.nationalreview.com/print/?q=NDg2OWExMjUzMTA5NGIyNTA5MzYwZjNiMzdmMWNkZjQ=

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 17, 2010 2:52 AM CDT up reply actions  

this article amuses me

because I started as a busboy when I was 16 years old and have held a slave-wage job every day of my life since, so I guess that’s where some of my ‘sense of entitlement’ comes from. I totally agree with this sentiment:

How come a guy as well-educated as Derb was shoveling concrete? Boy, he’s a real eccentric! No, I’m not. Those experiences were perfectly normal for a person of my generation. They’re just not normal any more, not for children of the American middle and upper classes.

I am what you’d call the definition of middle class: my dad’s worked in the public education system as a teacher and administrator for thirty years, my mom been a government drone for just as long. Their expectations that I hold a job, go to college, and pay for it myself were always a forgone conclusion. However, in this I agree with you, Ben, that people often go to college for the wrong reasons. Just because that’s what their parents did and that’s what you’re supposed to do, and that’s the wrong reason to do anything, in my opinion. It’s just not wrong for everyone all the time.

"Drinks are on me if Lewis posts >168IP and an era lower than 3.86." by RangerMad on Jan 20, 2010 12:36 PM PST
"HE GETS THE GODDAM CLEAT" by philkid3

by jam0152 on Jul 17, 2010 2:17 PM CDT up reply actions  

Well, then you have work experience...

and I was wrong to assume that you were saying you were entitled to a well-paying job out of college with no basis.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 17, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

I posted this by request.

Adam said for me to put up a fanpost about my feelings about higher education. So I jotted it down it between calls.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

So

Under your system, how does the career change work? Do you have to start in a tangential entry-level job all over again?

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 8:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes.

Why should you be able to change careers and not start over? Because you have a degree? What does your liberal arts degree mean when starting over in a new field? You don’t know shit.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

No no

That’s not the point. I mean, if you want to change careers and you already had a degree, you could just go back to school for one or two more years and get another degree related to the new career.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:00 AM CDT up reply actions  

You wold still have to start out at entry level in the new career.

If you were an English teacher, and decided you didn’t like it, you couldn’t go to school for two years, get a finance degree, and then be a portfolio manager.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:03 AM CDT up reply actions  

No

And while I plead my ignorance, I don’t understand the assumption that a person with no degree has as good a shot at the entry level finance position as a person with a degree.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:11 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's not the point.

Above you said that a person changing careers should not have to start over at entry level.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

I didn't say that at all.

But of course, “entry-level” is only so descriptive, and I imagine entry-level for a graduate is higher than entry-level for a non-graduate.

It’s the difference between being, in the law world, a first year associate and a legal assistant or paralegal.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:26 AM CDT up reply actions  

Well...

and acknowledging that, we can also say that an experienced legal assistant or paralegal could concievably command more than a first year associate.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes

But I doubt the legal assistant or paralegal could get the requisite experience in 3 years.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:30 AM CDT up reply actions  

We're not talking about 3 years.

We’re talking about 7. Undergrad + law school.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

There are many paralegals around town that make more than me.

But they have been doing this for like 20 years. I’ve only been at it for 5.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 9:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yep, I just dealt with one that was about 120k/yr

Plus a 30-40k bonus that we didn’t even bother to paper trail.

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on Jul 15, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

I suppose.

Most of the legal assistants I know have college degrees, but not know one way or the other, I won’t assume that that’s the norm.

But the earning potential is much lower for the legal assistant or paralegal. So even though they make more at first, within 5 years the associate’s salary could dwarf theirs.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 9:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Maybe.

And that’s the question. Compounding interest on a fully financed law school education vs. the safe bet of the paralegal?

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

My ex was a paralegal

She got fired for mouthing off to the boss who had just closed a ~20mil toxic tort case, her bonus was supposed to be ~80k on that case. I would call that the beginning of the end, hah.

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on Jul 15, 2010 2:26 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ah, so he was just herding comments.

That crafty S.O.B.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 15, 2010 11:29 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think that is what he was doing.

He has a tendency to tell me to shut up and stop talking to him when I bitch about stuff like this to him. If I annoy other people with my opinions, though, he finds it funny. So most likely he was just trying to get me to agitate LSB for his amusement.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 11:37 AM CDT up reply actions  

What about the military?

     If you join straight out of high school, you come in with little to no debt. The Army will give you a place to live, food to eat, and training, as well as pay you 1200-1600/month starting out. Between promotions, pay increases for time in service, and annual raises, I have averaged almost 10% raise per year over my first 5 years.
      I have been able to get 5 years hands on experience with Cisco Routers, call managers, Promina 800, Avaya PBX, along with other equipment. The army has paid for me to get my CCNA, CCNP, A + and Security + certifications.
     When/If I choose to get out I will have 9+ years of hands on, documented experience as well as many industry recognized certifications. The military also gives me $4500 a year to pay for college courses, as well as college credit for my job training. I’ll be done within the next year with my BA Information Technology. If I choose to stay, they offer very large bonuses for my field because they know we can make more on the outside.
     The best part is I have made contacts with many of the companies I will be looking at when I get out by working side by side with them while we were deployed.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 9:38 AM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Some occupations in the military translate very

well to the civilian sector. However, those jobs can be tough to get into and for some it may be beneficial to have some college credits before joining.

by RangerMad on Jul 15, 2010 9:44 AM CDT up reply actions  

It may be that way in other branches

but in the Army there are always open slots for 25B(information technology). We train almost 4,000 new and reclassing soldiers each year here at Fort Gordon. There aren’t as many slots for 25S(satelites), but it is easy to reclass into after your first contract. The key to getting the job you want is 1) doing well on the ASVAB, 2) you need to go see the recruiter in October when the new fiscal year has started and they are just starting their recruiting goals for the year. Bigger bonuses and more jobs at this time. With the economy the way it has been the last few years, they have met their retention and recruiting goals by march each year. Recruiting for the army in this economy is easy.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 9:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Pull a 96+ across the board on the ASVAB and you can pick anything :)

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on Jul 15, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

With that job experience

and those certs. you could make a nice living outside the army right now.
one thing ive found in the tech industry that companies love even more than tech certs is people who got training in the military.

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 15, 2010 9:50 AM CDT up reply actions  

My company loves, loves, loves...

ex-military.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:51 AM CDT up reply actions  

If I didn't have issues with being ordered what to do

i would have thought harder about joining after high school.
but i’m the type that would pop off to the boot camp instructor and get myself into shit.

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 15, 2010 9:54 AM CDT up reply actions  

I don't think I would make it past the recruiting office...

much less the drill instructor.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:55 AM CDT up reply actions  

This sounds like..

…a great reality TV show in the making.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:15 AM CDT up reply actions  

You know, they only pull that Louis Gossett shit during boot camp

It is vastly different from the civilian world, but it’s not like you have to eat shit anymore than in a regular job.

Boot camp was actually a pretty humorous experience overall.

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 2:52 PM CDT up reply actions  

I was the same way in high school

I went to college for a couple years and then decided to join. I had my own temper issues, but after the 9 weeks at Basic Training, I don’t really get yelled at much. The people that get their ass chewed are people that would get their ass chewed in any field. You do what you are expected and you are good. I do wish all of these kids coming in straight out of high school would have some work experience before they join. It seems a lot of them think their situation is a lot worse than what it is. The hardest part of the military is working with people that don’t want to be here and bitch about it all of the time, and you can’t fire them.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's what my dad did

Went to Mississippi State for a year, then dropped out to join the Marines for 4 years.

He went back to school (Augusta College) after getting out, had pretty much his entire education paid for by the government, then after graduation, took the Civil Service exam, and had a 35-year federal career, mostly for the FAA.

by RCCook on Jul 15, 2010 11:23 AM CDT up reply actions  

Dood, that job freaking pays!

I am working with a guy right now who is over 120k/yr, and he’s not even in management. I had no idea…

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on Jul 15, 2010 2:31 PM CDT up reply actions  

I work for the FAA

After accumulating 40 hrs of credit from three different colleges in seven semesters (had a GREAT time in college!) I fumbled around with various jobs fo a couple years then took the ATC test and aced it. Went to their screen, which was nine weeks of increasingly tense accelerated learning and testing, passed, and started on the job training. 22 years later I’ve averaged over 100k/yr. I have eight years to go before I’m Forced to Retire.

In vino, veritas

by Winojohn on Jul 16, 2010 1:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Most companies love that they don't have to pay for our Security Clearance.

The companies like DataPath, General Dynamics, Raytheon, and ESP also love military because they know they can go overseas to work and have a much lower dropout rate. I could get out now and get a 1 year contract making 140k-160k in Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel, Kuwait, or somewhere like that. I just stay in the military because I like working with my soldiers and I know I will still be relatively young(41) when I retire with a good pension, medical coverage, and 20 years experience.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Clearances

Yep, that factor is huge.

A secret clearance investigation costs my company about 5-6 thousand bucks. TS is 10k. When you consider that spending that money is basically a roll of the dice, since you never know whether the person will pass, having a security clearance on your resume is a tremendous boon to both sides.

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 2:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I know I can

I go back and forth on whether or not I should stay in. I lean more towards staying in because I will be half way done towards my pension. I also like the idea of having medical coverage paid for once I retire at 41. I can then move on to a tech job with my certs and 20+ years of experience. I am waiting to see if my Warrant Officer packet gets approved. I eventally want experience designing and running a network on the Division level.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 9:53 AM CDT up reply actions  

if you enjoy it no reason to leave really

since they pay for training, which many corporate jobs just wont do.
with your voice experience you should probably go for a ccvp as well.
does the army allow for training all the way to the ie level? that would be the golden ticket.

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 15, 2010 9:56 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yes

I can use my G.I. Bill to pay for the certification. I haven’t decided if I want to stay with voice, or go with security. The real money is in Security. I would like to sit for my CCIE at some point, seeing as there are only ~15,000 certified in the world.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

security has money thats for sure

but i think voice is whats going to be the most in demand and marketable due to companies switching pbx over to voip

"I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it." - Mitch Hedberg

by rentz on Jul 15, 2010 10:18 AM CDT up reply actions  

Are you single?

I honestly don’t see how men and women with spouses and kids do it. You’re gone 2 to 3 times as much as you are around.

I was only deployed for 1 year of my marriage and it was ROUGH. Can’t fathom what it would be like with a couple of lil ones mixed in.

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 3:01 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great job, holmes

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on Jul 15, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Great job, holmes

"I support you, Wash; I’ve always supported you," Young said
"Back on the scene, with a gangsta lean" RW

by Rodney on Jul 15, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Of course there is degree inflation

that is obvious – we don’t need you to point it out. We have too many liberal arts people paying $200K to get a degree that doesn’t help them or society at all. Big waste of money.

That said, not all degrees are worthless. We need engineers, and engineers need to go to school. We need scientists, scientists need to be trained. And obviously lawyers and doctors do as well.

Engineering I think has it under control. Most all engineers have a BS or equivalent. And then they get further training on the job. No real need for advanced degrees, but you absolutely need to the bachelors.

Science is a little peculiar. It should be more like engineering – everyone should have a BS or BA, but most people with PhDs just do work that should/could be done by people with undergraduate degrees. I actually think we have too many PhDs in this country (it is nonsense to say we need more). But maybe they have to distinguish themselves from the folks with BAs in biology and chemistry who go on to med school or generic business world.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 15, 2010 9:43 AM CDT reply actions  

why?

I read Ben’s post, skimmed some of the 400ish comments, but didn’t read them all in critical peer review detail because I have a real job that requires my degrees I am going to go to right now. And my comments were on engineering and science, and since I’m pretty sure I have both an engineering and a science degree, it isn’t as if I’m pulling stuff out of my ass.

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 15, 2010 9:57 AM CDT up reply actions  

he's saying...

that we were talking about how technical and engineering fields are (somewhat) exempted from my critique.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 9:58 AM CDT up reply actions  

oh

well I didn’t see all that much of that, other than the med school discussion

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 15, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I'd be curious to see

a metric of Total Education cost divided by initial starting salary.

Way back when I went to college, if you went to a Texas Public college, that ratio was under 1. I have no idea what that ratio is today.

Of course, to do a total analysis, I’d guess you’d have to throw in the opportunity cost of four years of lost wages.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 10:01 AM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

I was saying that earlier.

I found an academic paper on the IRR for law school degrees I could post for those interested.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 10:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

you don't just go to college to make money though

you go so you can choose a career that you will enjoy working in. There is value in that.

Most scientists probably never recover the Ivy League undergrad costs + the lost income for 10 years grad school and postdoc (esp since few fully trained ones make all that much money). But most realize that from the start;

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 15, 2010 10:08 AM CDT up reply actions  

I would guess though

that making more money than you would with a high school diploma is one of the largest factors in going to college versus working.

"Look, we're basically on earth to shit and fuck. So unless your job's to help people shit or fuck, it's not that important, so relax."-https://twitter.com/shitmydadsays

by DJCahill on Jul 15, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

true

and governments shouldn’t necessarily be subsidizing people to a) get a few more career choices and b) have fun

Go Rice Owls!

by JBImaknee on Jul 15, 2010 11:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ben, this has turned out to be a really good thread

I was expecting a bunch of name calling and shit when I read it before I got to the comments. I disagree with you on college being for suckers, but you do a good job of backing up your points

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 10:00 AM CDT reply actions  

consider it a public service...

from benmor78.

Maybe I can get some credit for community service hours for it.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 10:04 AM CDT up reply actions  

My last name is morris, and my birth year is 78

ben mor 78 .

Adam told me when I first started using the internet to use that as my username.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 10:22 AM CDT up reply actions  

Adam told you your username

and Adam told you to start this post….I think I’m starting to see a pattern. Honestly, it’s pry a bad idea to use that name for anything else, so as to prevent phishing if someone wants your identity. I might just be a little paranoid though.

by Tex2044 on Jul 15, 2010 10:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

It depends.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 10:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

I remember

Didn’t Adam tell you to update the AL West standings and to compile the community stat projections from 2009?

We all know how well that went…

by Heebs on Jul 15, 2010 1:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

I also tend to do things that he tells me to do in ways that will purposely irritate him. Like, put up a college sucks post but say that he told me to do it.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 7:58 PM CDT up reply actions  

I'm at a desk

and I’m doing little work. Damn LSB!

by RangerMad on Jul 15, 2010 11:19 AM CDT up reply actions  

College isn't for everyone

but I got full undergraduate tuition and now I’m a graduate fellow, so why wouldn’t I take that deal?

by aggierangerfan00 on Jul 15, 2010 10:42 AM CDT reply actions  

Clearly if it's not costing you anything, an education is usually a very good idea.
Don’t get me wrong, if someone is going to pay for it, and you can get out with no debt, more power to you, but increasingly higher education is turning into a sucker’s game.

by BuckyB on Jul 15, 2010 10:46 AM CDT up reply actions  

Ben, from the LA Time article you posted
No one is arguing that higher education isn’t beneficial. Even now, the unemployment rate for college graduates stands at 4.7% — less than half of the figure for workers with only a high school diploma.

Also, federal statistics for 2008 show that men 25 and older with a bachelor’s degree pulled down a median salary of $65,800. That compares with a median of $39,010 for men in the same age group who had completed only high school.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 10:47 AM CDT reply actions  

The returns on a degree keep diminishing.

And I said that if you can do it with no debt I suppose it’s fine. But the data keep showing that the ROI is getting smaller and smaller.

You’ve got government subsidizing leverage, insisting that education is a universal good, when it clearly is not. With that leverage, you have a non-dischargable obligation. And I think we’re nearing a tipping point where the non-dischargability becomes untenable and you start seeing business falling into the brink.

I’m sure for some people higher education is great. My premise is somewhat exaggerated in this post for effect. But not by much.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 11:05 AM CDT up reply actions  

Higher education

Just using myself and my two brothers as an example- I have a BA and an MA, both in history. My brothers both have associate’s degrees. I work in QA for a financial services company. One of my brothers is a corporal for the TCC police department; the other works as a lab tech at a hospital in Temple.

They both make over $15K more a year than I do.

Now am I glad I have my education? Absolutely, especially since I got through school without incurring any debt. Is it irritating that my brothers both make more than me? Just a little.

by RCCook on Jul 15, 2010 11:35 AM CDT up reply actions  

Seeing the MCAT discussion above, I have a question

for all the people that have taken the MCAT. I’m about to enter my 2nd year of college, and I plan on taking the MCAT coming up in August of 2011. Out of curiosity, I’m wondering, how did you guys prepare/study for it and how’d it end up going?

by MayurP on Jul 15, 2010 11:22 AM CDT reply actions  

actually

I already shadow a doctor and got some volunteering at the hospital done this summer, so I guess MCAT would be next on my list heh

by MayurP on Jul 15, 2010 11:33 AM CDT up reply actions  

That's a bigger deal than I realized

Having a lot of experience is a plus.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 11:42 AM CDT up reply actions  

I used to teach for the Princeton Review

I think that, if you can afford it, it’s the way to go. The courses seem to keep getting dramatically more expensive, but most people don’t have the knowledge of the exam and the work ethic to get out individually what the course helps most students get out of it. The key to remember is that you still have to put in a lot of hours outside of the class.

That being said, a class is by no means required. Some of the highest scores I know of were done by people who didn’t take a class at all. It really depends on your study style and your goals.

If you’re curious about it, I am pretty sure the AAMC puts up practice tests that you could take before making the decision. They used to at least…

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 11:41 AM CDT up reply actions  

Princeton Review was great for the LSAT.

I really thought it was worth the money. Raised my score by probably 10 points…which took me from the 55th percentile to the 90th that year.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 11:48 AM CDT up reply actions  

Yup

I felt like it took me from an 80th percentile score to a 90th percentile score the first time I took it. I was dumb and stopped working as hard once I started hitting the 90th percentile…I didn’t make that mistake the second time.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:05 PM CDT up reply actions  

My friend started teaching there...

….did it for about a year and a half. At the end, he could score over 95th percentile on the LSAT, DAT and MCAT. He ultimately took the DAT for real, scored like the 98th percentile, and is now fabulously wealthy, running his own practice in Frisco.

by FuturePants on Jul 15, 2010 12:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

Heh

Yeah, I had a friend who got a 95th percentile score on the MCAT. He took it at the same time his girlfriend (future wife) was taking the DAT. So he decided to take the DAT for fun and got a 98th percentile score. Let’s just say she was…nonplussed.

I ended up teaching Organic and Verbal…which is ironic because I always hated verbal.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 1:00 PM CDT up reply actions  

Awesome

Thanks! I’m definitely going to take either those or Kaplan, so hopefully they do help out

by MayurP on Jul 15, 2010 12:30 PM CDT up reply actions  

I've heard good things about Kaplan, too

From what I can tell, they’re equivalent, though there are people who swear by each. I’ve found that classes taught by college professors are a giant waste of time.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 12:41 PM CDT up reply actions  

Reading all this about student loan debt...

…makes me feel lucky to be out here in New Mexico where we have a lottery scholarship to pay for undergrad tuition. Basically, the money people spend playing the lottery goes to paying for the education of anyone with a GPA of at least a 2.5 (yeah, i know, not the highest of standards).

But now I’m in grad school working on the MBA only having to pay my way through 3 semesters of school. Pretty good deal if you ask me. But more to the point, I think its important to realize that degrees are certainly not worth as much as they once were, BUT not having a degree is going to be a big barrier to find quality work. I think the degree is more or less the easiest way to break into whatever field you want to pursue and then build a career from there, but I dont feel any sense of entitlement to get some great paying job out of college.

by Schrute Farms on Jul 15, 2010 11:30 AM CDT reply actions  

So

I got my degree and then ended up working in the mortgage industry where I didn’t need college. At least the Army paid for my degree.

by Zagg Parker on Jul 15, 2010 11:33 AM CDT reply actions  

Title should be "College is fo' suckas"

"Sometimes you just want to sit back and watch somebody throw 100." - Jeff Passan on Neftali Feliz

"Baseball's all that's real" - JB

by Ryin A on Jul 15, 2010 12:40 PM CDT reply actions  

Ben

Have you seen “Waiting”? Because I imagine the guy you’re talking about is like the guy who went to high school with Justin Long.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 1:13 PM CDT reply actions  

and not for the fact that i disagree

with some of your points, Ben. I have a BBA and dont use it for what I do, and that is IN business. However, I think there are just too many variables in this discussion, even when taking into consideration Engineering and Science degrees.

by eric03tx on Jul 15, 2010 1:50 PM CDT up reply actions  

Most Interesting Non-Baseball Post In A While

I’ve got a front row seat to this question: I work at a university where I’m also a student. The area I work in, research computing, values advanced degrees for its hires yet doesn’t seem to do a very good job of valuing the necessary technical skills that are, in my opinion, more important than advanced degrees.

I was fascinated by the LSB Education level fanpost, and how it was sort of accepted that a college education somehow makes a person “better.” It doesn’t. College is for suckers. Don’t get me wrong, if someone is going to pay for it, and you can get out with no debt, more power to you, but increasingly higher education is turning into a sucker’s game.

College can be for suckers, but for a non-trivial portion of the population, it’s also still the only way that people will have a shot at the possibility of a better life for themselves. It may take a while to pay off the debt accrued to earn that better life, but that beats the alternative of not having the possibility of a better life at all.

To a certain extent, a university education has traditionally served as a classist signaling mechanism, but what good is that mechanism now? 50 years ago it was somewhat rare to have a college degree, not so much anymore.

I’d say it’s less rare but considering that less than 30% of the population has a college degree, it’s still not common.

Sure, there are jobs that require a college degree as a condition for application, but every job I’ve ever had I’ve shared with college graduates, and I have a GED and no degree.

Have you ever considered that you might be an exception rather than the rule for folks with GEDs?

There are some things that higher education has in common with the subprime bubble: government subsidized assumption of risk through leverage, declining ROI, stated government policy of increasing accessibility to an asset or good.

The two things look the same on paper, but I don’t think they’re comparable. In subprime lending, you’re talking about fixed assets. You’re not doing anything to help the borrower make more money; you’re just making it easier for them to own a home in the hopes that they’ll be able to stay in the home and pay the taxes on that home. On the other hand, financial assistance to help someone earn a degree is the smartest investment government can make. A good public education and a good college education can lift people out of poverty. Those folks typically make more money, pay more taxes, and buy instead of rent. Everyone from municipalities to counties to state to the Feds wins in those situations.

Some of you guys have heard me mention Crazy Ryan before, my schizophrenic friend. He lives in a group home and is on Social Security disability. He was approached by a trade school recruiter, offering him $20k in student loans for automechanic classes. Is this what we’ve come to? Encouraging disabled people to take on $20k in non-dischargable debt because “education is GOOD!”

That recruiter ought to be charged for something criminal, but that’s not the only story I’ve heard where private trade schools and other institutions (including some colleges) are up to some shady shit. The more that the education world is forced to adopt a self-funding, market-driven business model, the more stories you’re going to see of institutions doing shady stuff to keep the lights on to make ends meet.

Change is coming. Those of us in Gen X are probably the last group that will see any real tangible benefit from a college education, and it’s dwindling.

I’ll agree with you that change is coming, but I’d phrase it in a different way. I think the country is undergoing a permanent economic shift right now and all of us, whether we have no degree, one degree, or advanced degrees, are going to have to temper our expectations if we’re comparing ourselves, our educations, and our economic outcomes to those of our parents’ generation.

It’s a big, tough contention to unpack. The longer I’ve worked at a university, the less convinced I am of the be-all, end-all value of an education. Unlike Ben, I don’t think it’s for suckers, but there’s no doubting that what an education meant to my parents’ generation is a thing of the past.

And we’ve not even touched on the idea that an education ought to make you a better citizen by providing you with critical reasoning facilities. Just think how big that thread would run!

by Mister Naxal on Jul 15, 2010 2:03 PM CDT reply actions   1 recs

Why are you still here?

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 2:13 PM CDT up reply actions  

Still where exactly?

In this thread? Because I wanted to see if anyone replied to my post. If you mean on lonestarball in general because I like the Texas Rangers.

You could mean why am I here on earth still, but that is just mean and nasty.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 15, 2010 2:19 PM CDT up reply actions   1 recs

But to read the whole reply

I would need to click on it, and if I wanted to reply I’d need to do the same.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 15, 2010 2:22 PM CDT up reply actions  

That doesn't require you to reply to other posts, does it?

If this such a beating, why are you commenting on it, or reading anything not in response to your comments?

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 2:24 PM CDT up reply actions  

Because if someone replies to me.

I like to reply to them? But I think we have all done the same thing before. In which someone has replied just like yourself to say the same thing, and I am not sure why people do it. I don’t know why I did it. Maybe to see if anyone agreed? I am not sure.

It’s interesting that so many people do it, though.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 15, 2010 2:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

But Mister Naxal didn't reply to you.

Or anyone, for that matter. He started a whole new sub-thread.

What I don’t understand is why you’d scroll down to a new sub-thread in a thread that you find a beating and post a comment about what a beating this thread is, and how that new sub-thread exemplifies that beating. Why bother?

by Josh Garoon on Jul 15, 2010 2:29 PM CDT up reply actions  

I just explained to you.

Almost everyone has done the same thing I did, and almost everyone has had someone reply saying the same thing you’re saying now. I think I did it mainly to see if anyone felt the same way. I guess another part of it could be just cause you can, and it’s easy.

I’m sure some people do it just to start an argument, but surprisingly that wasn’t my intention this time.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 15, 2010 2:32 PM CDT up reply actions  

yo
I heard you were looking for me?

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Jul 15, 2010 3:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

There you go, orange.

Someone replied to you. A boston guy that writes about lacrosse.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:57 PM CDT up reply actions  

Girl

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 11:27 PM CDT up reply actions  

Are you serious?

You make threads of IP-Relay calls or whatever that shit was.

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 2:14 PM CDT up reply actions  

We're not the same you and I

So we get beat by different things.

I'm just goofin' new boot goofin'

My blog: That's baseball for you

by iorange555 on Jul 15, 2010 2:21 PM CDT up reply actions  

lol

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 8:02 PM CDT up reply actions  

Do As I Do

I’m not offended if you don’t want to read it. I skip lots of folks’ stuff here on a daily basis, some because it’s too long for what I want to read at a given time. This topic happens to be something that interests me, though, and it’s something where I’ve got lots of questions and opinions.

If it’s too much, just skip it. That’s what I’d do.

by Mister Naxal on Jul 15, 2010 2:36 PM CDT up reply actions  

Regarding expectations

Globalization is probably going to play a role there as well.

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 15, 2010 2:12 PM CDT up reply actions  

I spent three years in school

Before I dropped out. I wouldn’t consider myself a dumb person. My test scores out of high school got me academic scholarship money. I took the LSAT my junior year and made a 170. But college just wasn’t for me. I hated it. Met a lot of good friends. But hated the school part. Which had never been a problem before. Everything was taught with clear bias one way or the other. My advisor put so much pressure on me to declare a major early so I can get to work on my degree plan. Some professors liked to begin the semester by doing some type of introduction like you would in fourth grade. When I said I was undeclared in one of my sophomore classes it was as if I had said major was Heat Pearings. Everyone was just shocked. I washed out not long after that. Wound up working a construction job. Became site manager within a year. Made great money, full benefits, enjoyed work. Friends all got degrees and went to work in fields that had no correlation to their degree. I finally went back to school when I decided I wanted to teach. No choice on that one. It’s taken me three years to erase the damage I did by being in school when I didnt want to be just because that’s what you were supposed to do. College is a necessary tool for certain fields, as it should be. But until you decide you want to be in one of those fields, it can do more damage than good.

by SaltyDawg on Jul 15, 2010 2:43 PM CDT via mobile reply actions  

x
Everything was taught with clear bias one way or the other.

That really upsets you?

by brettgardner on Jul 15, 2010 3:04 PM CDT up reply actions  

Poor choice of words

My first school many of my professors were more intereted in regurgitating what they said than critical thinking. Part of that was that I was at a private Christian college and there were some clear agendas and some seemed to view it as a ministry before higher education. Plenty of good professors too. But some of them left me jaded. I will say this for my time at UNT, though my thoughts didn’t line up with some of my professors, I was never in a class room where differing opinions weren’t encouraged and discussions could often become arguments. But they weren’t the type of arguement where the winner is important. They were always about spending time to really think rather than memorize. And that could be directly tied to the fact that at UNT I wanted to be in school. I was working toward doing something I wanted to do. Maybe that’s the important part. When I went to school because I wanted to, not because I was supposed to I found my experience beneficial, enjoyable, and absolutely worthwhile.

by SaltyDawg on Jul 15, 2010 10:38 PM CDT via mobile up reply actions  

My stepfather owned a pretty large general contracting company until he retired last yr

When he hired guys to start off as superintendents, he required a bachelor’s or better.

I asked him why he did this, since it seemed to me that the large majority of the skill set couldn’t be acquired in any university setting.

His response was a simple one: it showed him that they could accomplish a long range task.

"I don’t know how these SN blog authors get their gigs, but I’m frankly surprised SN tolerates AJM’s lack of effort." Tex34

At the end of the day.... Nolan Ryan will be the next control owner of the Texas Rangers Baseball Club.
by bigoil on Jul 7, 2010 3:37 PM EDT up reply actions

by Brian Thomas on Jul 15, 2010 3:10 PM CDT reply actions  

So I just got around to reading this thread...

and while I don’t agree with everything Ben has said, I understand the premise of his argument. It certainly is an interesting subject that should be open for debate. As is evident by 600 or so comments in less than 24 hours.

I definitely don’t see college as being for everyone. However, I have no regrets about my useless History BA either. I went to school because that was something that interested me. Not to find a better paying career. Although that has been a result of my degree as well. I work right next to a bunch of people with their financial degrees and I got to study something I enjoyed. Perhaps they enjoyed what they studied too, but I wasn’t going that route just because that’s what corporate America told me to do or because everyone else was doing it.

Now is college necessary? Obviously not. Is it just for suckers? I don’t think that’s the case either. I know for a fact that the two jobs I’ve got since I graduated I got because I have a degree. They didn’t seem to care what that degree was in, just that I had it. I think it shows potential employers that along with the proper training, you probably have the drive and intelligence to accomplish and succeed at a job. Now does that mean that someone who doesn’t have a degree can’t do the same thing? Of course not, but perhaps employers see that potential employee with a degree as being more likely to live up to the potential that they are seeking. An employer may have 200 candidates for a position, and all of them have a degree. Which is fine, but perhaps and can’t even get my foot in the door to be one of those candidiates without that degree.

The bigger issue for me is the cost of that education. This is where I see where Ben is coming from. I graduated in ‘01 and the cost of tuition has at least doubled since then. I can honestly say that I don’t know if I would have gone to school then if it costs what it does now. I was fortunate enough to be able to pay for school as I was going and to come out with no debt. I don’t think I would have gone if I was still paying for my degree today that I got almost a decade ago now.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jul 15, 2010 3:20 PM CDT reply actions  

I will be the first to say that college isn't for everyone and that you can have a succesful career without a degree.

My dad never got a college degree and makes over 150k a year. But, he’s had to work his ass off and still has certifications that have allowed him to work up to the job he has.

I’ve tried to read through most of these posts so far, and it seems that nobody has mentioned the fact that over the course of your career, a person with a college degree will on average earn more than a person with just a high school diploma. According to the US census bureau that difference is about $900,000.

In response to the opportunity cost argument made in the original post, assuming it takes a person 5 years to graduate, which seems like a stretch for a full-time student, a high school graduate would have to be earning somewhere around $180,000 more than the college student just to break even with the person attempting to get their college diploma.

by michael bluth on Jul 15, 2010 5:41 PM CDT reply actions  

Stayed out of this until now

People talk about how the guy with a HS diploma or GED is successful and/or made millions. Why? Because it’s unusual and that’s why it’s the Lifetime movie-of-the-week. Few people talk about the successful college graduate because that’s not notable or unusual.

I and most other people respect the hardworkers regardless what they do or their education level. I know legal assistants that are as knowledgeable or moreso in practice and procedure than lawyers I know but they can’t practice (although some kinda do) because they don’t have a piece of paper. Whatever. The lawyers paid the money and put in the work for that piece of paper and they get the possible reward for their investment.

Yes, the college degree “reward” may be bullshit. I know incredibly smart and capable people that have a HS degree and dumb people that have college degrees. Perhaps it’s unfair but until there is some type of accurate vetting process for intelligence and drive when applying for a job and awarding promotions that’s the way it is. This Fanspost isn’t going to change that. But smart people that work hard are going to beat out the college graduate eventually – I know that for a fact. I have an ex that has her HS diploma and is incredibly smart. There was an attorney (maybe two) that weren’t and didn’t work that hard. They’re gone while she was offered (and accepted) buying into a part of their floor so now her employer/firm pays her rent each month. The attorneys had the diploma to get (but not keep) the job while she’s sortof now a part owner. Smarts and hard work will win but a degree gets you started a bit higher.

"You promised me, Eckstein, that if I followed you, you would walk with me always. But I noticed that during the most trying periods of my life, there have only been one set of prints in the sand. Why, when I have needed you most, have you not been there for me?" David Eckstein replied, "Because my little legs had gotten tired, and you were carrying me." And I looked down and saw that I was still carrying David Eckstein.

Then he grounded out weakly to second.

by WyoRanger on Jul 15, 2010 7:15 PM CDT reply actions  

Way to many comments to read but here are my thoughts

1. Where did you get the idea that the post about education meant that those of us were looking down on those that do not? I have friends of every socioeconomic background. I cant speak for everyone, but it was interesting to find others that we discuss baseball with that we share a common interest and degree.

2. College does serve its purpose. One just has to be intelligent about how they use it. Spending $80K for a physiology degree to get a job (that wont likely be there, even in a good economy) is just not that intelligent. You must look at the job market for your potential after graduation. I went to a small pubic university, got a pharmacy degree, worked my tail off, got scholarships, and had parental help and graduated debt free, oh and also stepped into a 120K job immediately upon graduation (that increased to 150 in under 2 years and I now own my own pharmacy). Does that make me any better than anyone else, no I just used college to my advantage.

3. Also, if you want everyone to just get a job in a field for 4-5 years to master the job, remember this the next time you get a cough and go to the doctor. The doctor who skipped med school listens to your chest and gives you a script for an antibiotic that you take to the pharmacy. The pharmacy misfills the rx for amiodorone instead of azithromycin. The amiodarone causes pulmonary fibrosis that aggravates your lung cancer that you actually had. As you choke for your last breaths you dial a lawyer that knows you have a case but not sure what to do and after you die, your family gets nothing because he makes multiple mistakes in not filing producers correctly. Yes this is an over exaggeration, but you get the point, not every job can be learned outside of a college setting.

4. I learned so many life lessons during college that I would not be the man I am today without it. Also, the friendships forged at college will be of much more benefit than most from HS.

5. You are right, college is not for everyone, but to say its for no one is also shallow.

6. Lastly, your argument about college is arcane does not hold water. Here are numbers form the Dept of Education tracking average income for HS vs college degree http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=77 . Yes, money is not everything but it does help pay the bills and everyone regardless of income must learn to live within their means.

by RQ on Jul 15, 2010 10:23 PM CDT reply actions  

Try reading the comments.

Much interesting discussion that covers your points and my responses to them.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 10:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

Ben is wrong.

However, he’s had this mindset for as long as forever. So no use arguing it.

by Mike E on Jul 15, 2010 11:48 PM CDT up reply actions  

No, I'm not.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 15, 2010 11:49 PM CDT up reply actions  

mine do to

then again, there is very few people that get into my field anyways.

I think what is being overlooked in all of this is certain areas cannot just be learned on the job. Most of the procedural or background information in many areas are essential to the process and cannot be picked up on the fly.

In Ben’s viewpoint the burden to train the worker is strictly on the employer. The problem is that there is no financially feasible way for this to work out in the more demanding or technical fields.

Just as a generalization in my department approximately 5,000 people a semester take the entry level statistic courses at the undergraduate level. The department graduates 15-20 students a semester. In Ben’s model of education, the company gets to pay for everyone they bring in to teach them the basics hopping they get a capture rate greater than 0.05%. To get to that point, they have to pay the other 4980 schmucks and hope they can determine who is going to be worthwhile to keep to progress and who to through out, all the while paying every one of these guys a min wage.

 If you want to have a job driven educational situation, go join the military. That is the only area that has shown the longterm ability to be sustainable. The problem with that is for it to be sustainable it is heavily subsidized by taxes.

I think work experience is vital to longterm success, but without the core competencies developed in a structured classroom setting in many fields the barriers to entry are just way to great. It is easy to sit there and discuss the successes of a select few that went a different route, but outliers do not prove a case.

JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook

by laxtonto on Jul 16, 2010 12:21 AM CDT up reply actions  

As I said...

I think technical and engineering fields are an exception to the above.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 16, 2010 12:34 AM CDT up reply actions  

there is more than just tech and engineering fields that would apply

anything in the health care industry
anything in the educational field
anything that has a heavy mental component.

For your concept to work, everyone would need to start off with a manual labor set and progress from there. Talk about a pre-made caste system.

There will always be isolated instances of success through non-traditional channels, but anything that is either a core competency, a high liability area or technically challenging field will never succeed in a work trained only environment. If you eliminate all of those areas, which tend to be the upper crust in pay, then yes your concept works. The problem is that they are already doing that. That is why the differences in pay are still extreme between college graduates and non-college graduates. Those numbers skew even further when you isolate fields.

There are to many exceptions for various fields for this type of concept to work.

JD’s like, "you want some fucking pitching? Here’s all the pitching you can stand. Now choke on it, bitches!"- RCCook

by laxtonto on Jul 16, 2010 1:24 AM CDT up reply actions  

From everything I've read,

It seems like you are just a bitter guy who is frustrated that other people had different opportunities coupled with your clear sense of entitlement.

by choisne on Jul 16, 2010 10:59 AM CDT reply actions  

I don't understand...

how that’s what you’ve taken from this discussion.

That’s pretty clearly wrong.

"The only good is knowledge and the only evil is ignorance."-Socrates

by slc ranger on Jul 16, 2010 12:10 PM CDT up reply actions  

That's not at all what I got out of Ben's post.

"The Angels are like the villain in the movie that isn't dead until he's been stabbed 150 times in the bath tub, yet he still might come back up one more time." - Dave Barnett

by TXHC on Jul 16, 2010 6:43 PM CDT up reply actions  

Righty-o.

Got me.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 16, 2010 11:46 PM CDT up reply actions  

It's a pretty awesome post nonetheless

Especially given that I don’t think he’s ever posted on here before. Would have been funnier maybe if Adam posted it.

by ab03 on Jul 17, 2010 1:55 PM CDT up reply actions  

What sucks most is

that I have a bachelor’s two master’s and a law degree and am still in my 20’s. I could have had some real fun on this thread…damn me not paying attention to side threads

Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand.

by Texas Jihad on Jul 17, 2010 3:15 PM CDT reply actions  

If you mean Player Hater Degree

then count me in. Unless it adds to my $150k student loan debt

Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand.

by Texas Jihad on Jul 17, 2010 4:47 PM CDT up reply actions  

Words to live by

Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand.

by Texas Jihad on Jul 18, 2010 6:08 PM CDT up reply actions  

Getting to this threat kind of late.

But I must say that I agree with you for the most part. That being said, for people like myself who aren’t overly innovative or imaginative, a college degree is pretty much our only possibility for secure employment. But some of the most successful young people in my community have no college education. People in their late 20’s and early 30’s. Most of them became successful because they were shrewd enough to discover some niche in contract labor for the state.

by casew on Jul 17, 2010 5:13 PM CDT reply actions  

The problem with the original post...

…is that it lacks credibility. Reading an argument that a university education is worthless from someone that does not have one is sort of like arguing that strawberries taste bad even though you’ve never tasted one.

Having a university education doesn’t guarantee a lucrative and successful career, but there are definitive benefits to a university education. If there weren’t benefits, companies would require one for most professional jobs — it’s simple economics. If I can purchase services from someone willing to make less and get the same service, all other things being equal, why would I not do so. Because there’s a difference between high school graduates and college graduates. You can have your opinion, but the marketplace has voted and disagrees with you. And, the marketplace is what counts.

Lastly, don’t assume that all institutions of higher learning are equal. Again, this confirmed by the fact that graduates of some schools make more than others in the marketplace.

by Austin Ranger on Jul 18, 2010 2:32 PM CDT reply actions  

Ah...

but this assumes that there aren’t market failings… like real estate bubbles, or tech bubbles, or the bubble related to flowers back in the 17th century. What I am arguing here is that there is a higher education bubble.

You’re also committing a logical fallacy by insisting that I argue from authority.

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 18, 2010 3:45 PM CDT up reply actions  

My journalism degree actually helps me day-to-day in my job

but, had I known at the tender young age of 18 that I would end up being a cop and not a sports journalist, I would’ve joined the Marine Corps. I’m one of a small handfull of people at my place with a 4-year degree. I guess it’ll come in handy if I ever decide to look for that pot o’ gold at the end of the Federal rainbow, but for right now I wish I could’ve taken that $80K and given it to some charity that needed it more than I did.

"Does this effectively hide my thunder?"

by Bob Loblaw on Jul 19, 2010 12:18 AM CDT reply actions  

Anyone here ever gotten a loan from Sallie Mae?

Are they really as terrible as most reviewers make them out to be??

by Mike E on Jul 19, 2010 6:54 PM CDT reply actions  

I owe them plenty

they seem fine to me

Yeah, well, sometimes nothin' can be a real cool hand.

by Texas Jihad on Jul 19, 2010 8:37 PM CDT up reply actions  

I need a job

Anyone hiring. I’ve got a lot of student loans to pay back.

by badradiorules on Jul 20, 2010 9:52 PM CDT reply actions  

What's your major

MikeE?

If Brad Pitt is playing Beane who do you want playing you?
JD: Eddie Guardado.

by GhettoBear04 on Jul 22, 2010 8:02 AM CDT up reply actions  

you should become a teacher

then the govt will help pay back your loans if you do it for a few years heh

by Mike E on Jul 22, 2010 2:35 PM CDT up reply actions  

Megan McArdle on tenure...

and some interesting discussion in the comments that’s along the lines of what’s being discussed here…
http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2010/07/tenure-an-idea-whose-time-has-gone/60187/

"Blalock in the cleanup spot makes gives me agita." - Dustin

by benmor78 on Jul 22, 2010 10:40 AM CDT reply actions  

This has been a good discussion, Ben.

But that article is pretty weak. She doesn’t really provide any evidence to support her points, and I don’t think they’re self-evident.

For the record, I have been on your side of this argument before. I have a college degree, but I was on the verge of dropping out freshman year.

by VM on Jul 22, 2010 2:51 PM CDT up reply actions  

Too many inconsistencies between your opinion and your defenses of it in your comments.

I read the entire thread and found it fascinating, to say the least. Great minds on LSB.

I wrote a rebuttal, three pages worth, but decided the real value in that was personal – it made me think about things I hadn’t though about in 30 years. But, no need for me to try and change your mind which is “out there” publicly – even though the inconsistencies hadn’t been touched upon – because nothing solidifies a made-up mind like publicly defending a made-up mind – as you have defended so well, so many times in this thread. In other words, I assume you will stick to your guns. Good for you.

Your composure has been admirable on such an HSO. You are to be commended. I don’t agree with you, but I certainly appreciate your posit and manner in defending it.

It's "Ode to Joy," from the Ninth Symphony. - Josh Garoon

by jackanape on Jul 23, 2010 7:55 PM CDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Hong_kong_small
OT: UEFA Euro 2012 Thread
Small
Ranger Rowdy Time!
Bc0nc_small
Minors Thread: Mid-Late May

Recent FanPosts

Neftali_old_timey_small
You should be at the lake - Memorial Day OT
Macho_man_randy_savage_small
Sunday OT
Small
Loking for Batters' Eye Club 7/24 or 25
Small
Texas Rangers: 2012 Community Mock Draft Picks
Macho_man_randy_savage_small
Saturday OT
White_blackpool_icon_small
Draft Discussion
Small
MOD#6 - Rangers (2nd Round - 93rd Pick)
Andy_small
Afternoon OT Thread
Macho_man_randy_savage_small
5/25 OT 1
Neftali_old_timey_small
5/24/2012 OT 2

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Yahoo_full_count

Manager

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris

Editor

477845_small ghostofErikThompson

Author

Matchstick_small Brad