Mitch Moreland OPS Over/Under Poll
With the ZiPS projections coming out for the Rangers last week, we are doing a series of polls asking folks to pick whether they think various players will go over or under the OPS that ZiPS projects.
ZiPS projects Mitch Moreland to have an OPS of 753 in 2012.
Do you think it will be over or under that figure? Cast your vote...
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is not real.
We’re not about sending messages. We’re about winning ballgames.-Wash, 04/03/11
Hell to the fucking no. -Wash, 10/07/11
Or it's scheduled in advance.
One or the other.
"I became an optimist when I discovered that I wasn't going to win any more games by being anything else." by Earl Weaver
Over easy
the injuries have the projections underrating his potential, and he’ll be somewhat protected with platooning around Young and Naps.
Some see a glass half empty, some a glass half full. I see a glass that's twice as big as it needs to be. - George Carlin
Given that he's going to platoon
And that I refuse to believe the latter half ‘10 and the first 6 weeks of ’11 were an illusion, I’ll say over. Comfortably over.
"I have thought a lot about why people get so hostile online, and I have come to believe it is primarily because we live in a society with a hypertrophied sense of justice and an atrophied sense of humility and charity, to put the matter in terms of the classic virtues." --Alan Jacobs
by JDT217 on Feb 17, 2012 1:52 PM CST reply actions 1 recs
That's what I was going to say, minus the platoon
It is hard to imagine 2010 and that year’s playoffs, and the first two months of 2011 were not indicative of what he is capable of achieving, really what he should achieve. I’ll go with .782
I'm going over
I think he’s going to be at least an .800 OPS guy.
Josey Wales: "And if you think intangibles really do exist, how in the F could you vote Ellsbury as the MVP?"
Adam J. Morris: "If it weren’t for my horse, I wouldn’t have spent that year in college."
I vote under
without even reading what the projection was
Go Rice Owls!
Would be a Matt Harrison fan, but I only like superstars
The projection is .753
Why do you think he’ll be under that?
Josey Wales: "And if you think intangibles really do exist, how in the F could you vote Ellsbury as the MVP?"
Adam J. Morris: "If it weren’t for my horse, I wouldn’t have spent that year in college."
BECAUSE CHRIS DAVIS IS TERRIBLE
"I became an optimist when I discovered that I wasn't going to win any more games by being anything else." by Earl Weaver
by Brad on Feb 17, 2012 2:09 PM CST up reply actions 1 recs
Under
.752
I hate The Angels so much, it's actually cramping my style. (See RevHaloFans SBN profile page)
by Gay For Feliz on Feb 17, 2012 2:43 PM CST via mobile reply actions
so...
.751?
Some see a glass half empty, some a glass half full. I see a glass that's twice as big as it needs to be. - George Carlin
I vote under
And I think his OPS will be .752.
I was making a joke. I think ZIPs projections are very accurate for Mitch,
I hate The Angels so much, it's actually cramping my style. (See RevHaloFans SBN profile page)
by Gay For Feliz on Feb 17, 2012 5:32 PM CST via mobile up reply actions
worried about the wrist
under
"Sometimes you just want to sit back and watch somebody throw 100." - Jeff Passan on Neftali Feliz
"Baseball's all that's real" - JB
How many players come right back from wrist surgery and don't lose any power?
Still can’t hit lefties.
Under. Comfortably under.
"The Rangers system just happens to be stupid with depth." - Jason Parks, 7/14/11
2011-07-25 17:44:05 - benjihana: Ahh my backdoor!!!
"It appears I made a mistake. I did not know what pegged meant" - Schultzy, 11/13/11
I think with a healthy wrist he can get back his patience
Which will bump his OBP and thus get him over a .750 OPS
Yeah, if he's below that it won't really matter
Because Brad Hawpe will probably have his roster spot.
There's a fire in the city of pictures
Leaving nothing but ashes below

by 































