Ramifications of the Soriano trade
So the deal is apparently Soriano for Wilkerson, Sledge, and minor league pitcher Armando Galarraga (who should come over once the Rule 5 draft is over).
I know there are people bitching about this deal, complaining that the Rangers shouldn't have traded Soriano without getting pitching in return. Those people are idiots.
I love this trade, as I've made clear. Wilkerson is a better player than Soriano -- they are about even offensively, but Wilkerson:
* is much more of an asset defensively,
* will make about $4.5-5 million in 2006, versus the $10 million Soriano will get,
* is two years away from free agency, versus one year for Soriano, and
* is a year younger than Soriano.
Wilkerson can play any of the three outfield positions, and will fill either the gaping right field hole or the almost-gaping centerfield hole, representing a big upgrade to one of those positions.
Meanwhile, you have Ian Kinsler -- who Will Carroll said today would be one of the 5 best prospects in baseball next season -- ready to step in at second base, where his overall contributions, factoring in both offense and defense, should be pretty close to what Soriano would provide. Part of the reason Soriano needed to be dealt was to make room for Ian Kinsler, who folks have referred to as a Mike Young Starter Kit.
You've got Terrmel Sledge, sort of a lefty Kevin Mench in terms of his skill set. With him here, you've got all sorts of options available in the outfield and DH slots. You can put Mench in left, Wilkerson in center, let Sledge and GMJ split time in right, let Dellucci and Botts DH, and let Nix get a full season at AAA. You can trade Mench for pitching, put Wilkerson in the outfield, and let Sledge, Nix, GMJ, Botts and Dellucci fill the other two outfield slots and the DH spot. You can trade GMJ to the Yanks for...I don't know, something, and let Sledge be the 4th outfielder. You can trade Dellucci to one of the various teams that have expressed interest in him, make Botts your regular DH, and let Sledge take over the lefty-hitting 4th outfielder role Dellucci would fill.
Or you could get really creative and aggressive, spend some of the money you are saving by not paying Soriano on Milton Bradley, trade Mench for pitching, and roll with a Wilkerson/Bradley/Nix outfield, which would give you one of the best defensive outfields in baseball, along with pretty solid offense from them as a group.
You've got all those options, and on top of that, and you still have Adrian Gonzalez and Kevin Mench available to use as trading chits for a deal for pitching, if you want. And you've added another good young live arm to the farm system, as well. You've got a lot of ammunition left with which to make a deal for pitching.
And on top of everything else, you are paying Wilkerson about $5 million less than you would be paying Soriano for 2006, meaning you've got that much more in the budget to spend on the free agent market.
So while the Soriano trade didn't bring pitching in here directly, it gives you the freedom to make other moves to add pitching, and it frees up additional payroll room to spend money on pitching.
Outstanding deal. Great job by Jon Daniels. I give this trade an "A".
0 recs |
27 comments
Comments
Bradley
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 8, 2005 12:27 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wilkerson=Soriano, Offensively???
Am I missing something?
by Texasportsfan on Dec 8, 2005 8:39 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I
by jf55510 on Dec 8, 2005 12:26 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Dude
Wahw, you just gave me whiplash...
by hightowersmith on Dec 8, 2005 12:28 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
same here...
A Freudian slip?
For a second, I thought to myself, "Holy crap, we've traded Mench too!"
by Rangersfan22 on Dec 8, 2005 12:30 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Oops...
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 8, 2005 12:32 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wilkerson's health?
And finally Kinsler sees the door to the Show open. Kewl biz all around.
by shroomer on Dec 8, 2005 12:31 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Question about Salary?
I mean say we never traded AROD we would be paying him what $20 million.
Now, we are paying the following (or projected for 2006):
AROD - ?
Soriano - None
Wilkerson - $4 million (projected)
Sledge - $500K (projected)
Galaragge - ?
So maybe we are looking at $5 million (not including any AROD salary pickup)...wow that is an approximate $15 million savings.
I will say that no matter what at this point, the Rangers have gotten out from underneath that horrible AROD contract (notwithstanding his MVP type play).
I guess a follow-up....
What have we done with that savings? just lowered our payroll, i know that is a big part of the answer
by simbaa on Dec 8, 2005 12:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Salary Comparison 2003 vs 2005
2003 Rangers: http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TEX/2003.shtml
2005 Rangers: http://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/TEX/2005.shtml
I was able to get salaries and breakdown by areas and see where the money went.
For 2003 the total payroll was $94,027,500. For 2005 the total team payroll was $60,877,500. A difference of $33,150,000 or a 35% decrease.
Now going by groupings.
Starting 9 (including DH):
2003 : $56,782,500
E. Diaz, Big Tex, Young, AROD, Blalock, J. Gonzalez, Everett, Mench, and Palmeiro
2005: 23,695,000
Barajas, Big Tex, Soriano, Young, Blalock, Hidalgo, Mathews, Mench, Delluci
That is a decrease of $33,087,500
Pitching (5 Starters, 5 Relievers, and 1 Closer)
2003: $30,655,000
Park, Valdez, Thomson, Lewis, Callaway, Powell, Van Poppell, Yan, Fultz, Cordero, Urbina
2005: $32,967,500
Rogers, Park, Benoit, Drese, Young, Karsay, Almanzar, Brocail, Mahay, Shouse, Cordero
That is an increase of $2,312,500
Rest of Team
2003: $6,590,000
Perry, Greene, Krueter, Sierra, Spencer, Lamb, Glanville, Clark, Garcia, Nitkowski
2005: $4,215,000
Alomar, DeRosa, Allen, Gonzalez, Astacio, Dickey, Ramirez, Riley, Buckvich, Regilio
A Decrease of $2,375,000
Our pitching staff as a whole stayed even in salary. Our savings was complete in the starting 9. Most of that was savings in not having AROD, Juan Gonzalez, Everett, and Palmeiro. In 2003 the three of Big Tex, Young, and Blalock earned $1.5 million, in 2005 that was $7 million.
Does this tell us anything. I am not sure but it is interesting and even more interesting to note that the only real decrease in payroll occurred on the hitting side. Of course when you have Chan Ho on both teams with that salay it does hurt. Think about this, Chan Ho earned about 40% of the pitching staff (5 starters, 5 relievers, and 1 closers) salary in 2003 and a whopping 49% of that groups in 2005. Wow, a ton to invest in one guy (unless his name is maybe Clemens).
by simbaa on Dec 8, 2005 1:09 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
AJM
by Longhorn on Dec 8, 2005 12:37 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
BA on Galarraga
Strengths:
Galarraga has a lively 92-94 mph sinker and a hard, sharp slider that he can throw for strikes and use as an out pitch. He has a strong, athletic frame and attacks hitters from a three-quarters arm slot. He's very competitive and shows a mean streak.
Weaknesses:
For Galarraga to stick as a starter, he needs to complement his two plus offerings with a third pitch. He must continue to develop his changeup, which shows some promise. He doesn't walk many batters but sometimes misses his spots inside the zone.
The Future:
Galarraga can be a No. 3 starter if his changeup emerges. If that doesn't work out, he could be a powerful bullpen arm. He figures to start 2006 back at Harrisburg but could earn a big league promotion late in 2006.
by Adam J. Morris on Dec 8, 2005 12:43 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I would LOVE to see Bradley here
Make it happen, baby.
by alon91 on Dec 8, 2005 12:39 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
This is AWESOME
As to starting pitching, who CARES? There's such a low possibility of the Rangers competing in 2006 (what with the free agent chaff left out there) that I don't care about getting "major league ready" pitching if it's Lohse-like. And frankly the Beckett-like ones are going to cost an arm and a leg to get even with only 2 years left until he leaves.
This is a MUCH better deal, IMO.
Req
by Requiem on Dec 8, 2005 2:36 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
ok
by Sharky on Dec 8, 2005 5:27 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Rangers ESPN board
Just a comment..placed here because of the 300 word requirment
by Sharky on Dec 8, 2005 5:30 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wilkerson
by Ian Cobb on Dec 8, 2005 8:32 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Wilkerson=Soriano, Offensively????
Am I missing something?
by Texasportsfan on Dec 8, 2005 8:40 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
Injuries
by Texasportsfan on Dec 8, 2005 8:54 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Yes you are
The big thing of course is the park they play in. If you look at their road numbers from the last 2 years Wilkerson was much better:
2005
Wilkerson road OPS = .751
Soriano road OPS = .639
2004
Wilkerson road OPS = .857
Soriano road OPS = .735
by Chris Martin on Dec 8, 2005 9:01 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Wilkerson
And you picked out his only good year. Not that he has much to choose from.
by Andrew F Medina on Dec 8, 2005 3:21 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I also picked 2005.....
by Chris Martin on Dec 8, 2005 3:35 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Not too sure about the trade
by pwh9980 on Dec 8, 2005 9:13 AM CST reply actions 0 recs
I agree...kind of
Personally, I loved watching Soriano pop his jersey 36 times a year. It made me smile. Oh well
Anyway, we still need pitching. I say Clemens and Morris would be acceptable.
by DIESCTBRS on Dec 8, 2005 9:17 AM CST up reply actions 0 recs
Soriano is premier
Sori is a very talented guy who doesn't apply it very well. The Rangers got back two guys who are literally better offensive and defensive players and a pitcher who may amount to something.
Beyond that, any assessment is only fan appeal.
by Ed Coffin on Dec 8, 2005 2:52 PM CST up reply actions 0 recs
I'm totally lost
And on the defense, I'm going to go out on a limb here but is it that important? I mean how many games per season are won or lost on defense per team? Maybe a couple. And these guys are professionals. Its not like there is a HUGE difference unless a player suddenly goes Knoblauch. Ozzie Smith, the greatest fielding short stop ever averaged 15 errors per season over his career. Soriano averages 20 per season. A difference of 5 droppoed pop ups.
But what is relevant here is that we are talking about batters again! Who cares. It's the pitching! Its always been the pitching! You can have the Yankees 'Murderers Row' and your still going to wind up in the cellar if your starting rotation is Padilla, Chris Young, Kameron Loe and Juan Dominguez. The Braves have won 15 of the last 16 penants and you can barely name any of their batters during that time period.
There's 4 teams in the division and we have only made the playoffs twice in 30 years (I know there use to be more than 4 back in the day.) There's something broke in Texas. But it is never addressed. The solution is always another outfielder.
So noone will trade an ace without wanting Tex, Blalock, Young or Soriano? So trade them. Trade em all. Get a freekin pitcher, or even get 2! Build around that. Sure it will be sad to see them go, but do you want to watch homeruns or win a penant?
No pitchers will come to Texas? Move the fences 10 feet back. Hell move them 40 feet. Change the name from "Ameriquest Field" to "Hummers for Pitchers Park." Just get some freekin pitching. That's all that matters - its the pitching!!! Why won't that ever be addressed in Texas? I had the same conversations in 1985! It's not a secret, everyone knows it so why can't it be fixed damn it! AAAAAhhhhhh.
And don't forget that Texeira's agent is Boras who should not be allowed to ever play with Hicks again after the Arod deal.
by rocky on Dec 16, 2005 5:16 PM CST reply actions 0 recs

by 















