Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Around SBN: Dolphins knock off Rams; get back into playoff race Bar-right-arrows



The Texas Rangers, the best team in the A.L. West

Maybe it is just me, but this doesn't really feel like a team that is going anywhere this season.  It doesn't have the same aura about it as last year's team did.

Of course, I kept expecting last year's team to fall off anyway, which didn't happen until late September, but still...there was definitely a different feeling...

The 2004 team was 25-17 after 42 games, compared to 22-20 this season.  On the other hand, Oakland and Anaheim were looking a lot stronger last season, as well...this year, Oakland and Seattle both look dead in the water, and Anaheim is weaker...

And at this point, the Rangers are the best team in the A.L. West, at least so far this season.

Why?  Well, let's take a look at Baseball Prospectus's adjusted standings...the Rangers have been the best team in the West so far this year.  Texas and Anaheim are even in Pythagorean standings, which calculates the expected won/loss record based on runs scored and runs allowed -- so far this season, Anaheim has been a little luckier than Texas.  And Pythagorean standings are a better measure of how a team has actually performed, and is likely to perform going forward, than actual won/loss records.

But taking projections another step is BP's second order standings, generated by extrapolating won/loss records based on expected runs scored and runs allowed based on the team's component performance.  This is done using BP's EQR formulae for every team's battling line and opponent's batting lines, since, once again, the expected runs based on the component elements of the offense and pitching staff are a better measure of true performance, and expected future performance, than the actual runs scored and runs allowed.  This helps eliminate some of the random elements from early-season performances, and identifies teams that are scoring or allowing significantly more or less runs than would be expected based on the players' actual performances, since those disparaties are generally going to even out over the course of a season.  After all, a team that has scored 20 more runs than would be expected based on the stats one-fourth of the way through the season is extremely unlikely to be 80 runs above expectations at season's end.  

So if we look at expected runs scored and runs allowed, based on the stats so far this season, Texas looks about the same...they are projected as a 21-21 team, rather than a 22-20 team.  

But Anaheim takes a huge hit...taking expected runs and runs allowed and applying the Pythagorean formula gives you an expected 16-24 record, worse than even the Mariners.  The Angels have scored 10 more runs this season than would normally be expected, and have allowed a whopping 35 runs fewer than would be expected based on their pitchers' performance, an enormous disparity.  Over the course of a full season, that projects to a 135 run difference between expected pitching performance and actual pitching performance...a gap that is completely unsustainable.

So, using this analysis, the Rangers have been the best team in the West this season, albeit while playing like a .500 team...the other three teams in the division have simply been much worse.  

The offenses in the A.L. West have been horrid so far this season...Anaheim, Seattle and Oakland are 28th, 29th and 30th, respectively, in EQA this season.  And with Anaheim (the only other team in the West that looks like it could contend for the division), the offensive weakness doesn't simply look like an aberration...this likely is just not a good offensive team.

Yes, Vlad is great, and he's been great this season.  But Garret Anderson is back to hitting the way he has hit for most of his career, posting a sub-par .268 EQA; age appears to have caught up with the 41 year old Steve Finley; Darin Erstad and Orlando Cabrera are as mediocre as they've been throughout their career; Chone Figgins is back to playing like a utility man; and Jeff DaVanon, Dallas McPherson, Juan Rivera, and Adam Kennedy have been awful.  Rivera, McPherson and Kennedy should improve somewhat, but this still looks like a bad offensive team.  They do have the resources to make improvements during the course of the season -- either internally, by promoting Casey Kotchman, or through trading some of their abundant minor league talent -- but until that happens, the Angels don't have a playoff-caliber offensive team.

The Angels have gotten out to a 2.5 game lead in the West on the strength of their pitching...they are 3rd in the A.L. in team ERA.  But the supporting stats don't justify that ERA:  the Angels are 6th in the A.L. in WHIP, 7th in OPS allowed, 6th in K/BB ratio, 7th in homers allowed, 7th in average allowed...in all the component stats, the Angels' pitching staff has been middle-of-the-pack.

So as we stand here today, the Angels have a bad offensive team -- whose only quality hitter so far this season has just suffered a separated shoulder -- and a mediocre pitching staff.  That's good news for the Rangers, obviously...but because Anaheim has been winning at an unsustainable rate, it creates the appearance that Anaheim is a team that is in good shape the way it is.  Thus, no pressure in the front office to make a deal, no worries about the state of the team...they are the favorites in the division and have a 2.5 game lead, so everything is going to plan as far as Anaheim's concerned.  

There's no pressure on the team to shore up its problems...Darin Erstad can continue starting at first base for no good reason, Vlad Guerrero can keeping carrying the offense with no help, because on the surface, it looks like everything in Anaheim is fine.  

Which is actually good news for the Rangers...Anaheim's early success means complacency, it means not fixing the holes in the team, and that means that Anaheim is more likely to struggle and be vulnerable down the stretch.  It makes it that much more likely that Texas will be able to surpass Anaheim come August and September.

And yet...and yet...

I wish I had more faith that Texas was going to do what is necessary to actually pass Anaheim.

This is a team that is still getting nothing out of the catcher slot, that is getting nothing out of right field, that has no DH against lefthanded pitchers, that is getting little offense from shortstop and centerfield, and that only has two starting pitchers that are pitching well right now.  A lot of those problems could be fixed from within -- with Gerald Laird, Jason Botts, and Ricardo Rodriguez in the majors, this team would immediately be better -- but if the Rangers really want to succeed this season, they are going to have to get at least a bat, and probably another starting pitcher, from outside the organization.

One of the most worrisome things about the first quarter of the season for the Rangers is that the team's success is inordinantly centered around three players -- David Dellucci, Chris Young, and Kenny Rogers -- who are performing way over their heads.  Dellucci is not going to walk 160 times this season.  Young and Rogers aren't going to finish the season with ERAs around 3.00.  The Rangers need the young core players from last season -- Blalock, Teixeira, Mike Young, and Drese -- to perform at a much higher level than they have thusfar.  Those four players have been, to varying degrees, disappointments this season, which probably explains why I, for one, have felt something of a malaise so far this year.  It is hard to get fired up about your team when the only reason it is above .500 is because a 4th outfielder is having a career year and a 41 year old free-agent-to-be has strung together 30-something scoreless innings.

But the Rangers have a golden opportunity this season.  Anaheim is weak, Oakland and Seattle are non-factors, and this is a division ripe for the taking.  It makes this offseason's failure to do anything that much more frustrating, but Anaheim's problems are such that even the disastrous Ranger offseason can be overcome.  Just a few simple things could make the Rangers the favorites in the West:

  1.  Replace Pedro Astacio with Ricardo Rodriguez.  Gammons called Astacio the free agent bargain of the year a few weeks ago, something that seems more ludicrous with every passing day.  The Rangers are apparently going to bump his next start back a couple of days, to get him more bullpen work, but that's simply delaying the inevitable.  I can't understand or explain their fascination with Astacio, but the guy can't pitch, and Ricardo Rodriguez can.  Sending Astacio out, and bringing RicRod up, should mean the difference of 2-3 wins over the course of the rest of the season.
  2.  Make Gerald Laird the starting catcher.  I've railed on this time and again, so I won't belabor it here, but every day that the best catcher in the organization continues to toil in AAA so that the manager's buddies can futz about behind the plate is a day wasted.
  3.  Get another bat in here.  Either DH or right field, it doesn't really matter.  But the Rangers need a legitimate hitter...they simply can't afford to keep giving away at bats with the likes of Chad Allen and Richard Hidalgo.  Mike Sweeney would be fine.  Cliff Floyd would be fine.  Let's get creative, see if we can pry Mike Cameron away from the Mets, and plug him in centerfield, moving Nix into a platoon in right field with Hidalgo, which would upgrade the Rangers both offensively and defensively.  But the Rangers cannot expect to compete without another big stick.
  4.  Find a righthanded bat to platoon with Dellucci.  This should be easy...there are guys out there who can't field but who can mash lefty pitchers, and the Highest Paid G.M. In Baseball should be able to find one better than Chad Allen, who doesn't do anything well enough to be anything other than an emergency call-up.  Going forward with Chad Allen as part of your DH platoon is a signal that you aren't serious about trying to compete.
  5.  Put Juan Dominguez in the pen as the setup man.  The losses of Francisco and Almanzar have been devastating...but the organization needs to address that hole by bringing up Juan Dominguez and letting him be the 8th inning guy.  Buck might think Doug Brocail has good face, but he doesn't have a good fastball, and can't hack it in a high-leverage role like that.  Dominguez has shown his fastball/change combo is devastating the first time through a lineup, even against major leaguers, and to continue to have him languishing in AA is simply hurting the major league club.  It is time to bring him up and let him be the setup man for Cordero the rest of the way.
That's it.  Pretty simple, I think.  Do 1 through 5, and the Rangers are the favorites in the A.L. West...

0 recs | Comment 10 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Nice
Nice analysis.  As much as I would like for the Rangers to push to about 5-10 games over .500, they don't look to be up to the task with the roster in its current state.  I don't see why it is taking them so long to start making some obvious moves at catcher, pitcher and outfield.

USA Today's usually useless team notes were actually interesting today:  "The Rangers have lost their last six games against left-handed starters. In those games, they've scored a total of 11 runs and have hit .199. And it's gotten worse recently. They have not mustered an earned run in the last 20 1/3 innings against a left-handed starter."

by Observer on May 21, 2005 1:19 PM CDT   0 recs

Great article...
....now if this could simply continue circulation throughout the D-FW media.

I think the difference b/w the two seasons was the propensity last year to finish strong in the later innings and nail down victories with a rock-solid bullpen...

This year, Cordero has already blown a few key saves, but major meltdowns in the 7th and 8th inning have cost the Rangers several victories.  We'll have to wait-and-see to find out if Loe, Regilio, and Dominguez can adapt to becoming capable set-up men.

by Cody Cheek on May 21, 2005 1:23 PM CDT   0 recs

article
i agree especcialy with making laird the starting catcher.  Barajas is a bust and its amazing they havnt figured it out yet.  I also agree with bring ric rod into the starting lineup, becasue astacio is not a good pitcher and we should bring in a better pitcher that was awsome last year and is thriving in the minors.

by dampier on May 21, 2005 1:46 PM CDT   0 recs

Very nice piece...
Summed up my thoughts perfectly.

by Mahon on May 21, 2005 2:12 PM CDT   0 recs

timetable
Adam,

Excluding the Barajas-Laird switch (which is pretty overdue), what's your timetable for making these moves before the season is lost?

by hightowersmith on May 21, 2005 2:16 PM CDT   0 recs

The remainder...
RicRod and Dominguez should be up now.

I'd be shopping for another bat, and scouring the waiver wire and minor leagues for a righty platoon DH that I could find, but neither of those are "right now" type moves.

Particularly if Vlad is out for a while, no one is going to run away with the division, and this is probably a .500 team (maybe a tad under, with Almanzar and Frankie gone) as constituted.  So even if we wait until the ASB, we are probably only a few games back, and there is still time to make a move.

Adding a big bat from outside is the most problematic...I didn't like the Thompson/Kinsler for Walker trade that almost went through last year, for example.  I don't want the team to overpay, in terms of prospects, for a short-term solution, since I think this team's best days are still ahead of it, and would hate to see a Kinsler or a Botts discarded for a mediocre one year solution.

The guys I'd like to see targeted are salary dumps...Sweeney, for example, or Klesko or Nevin.  Or Matt Lawton, who would be a nice fit in the leadoff slot.  Given the payroll and the market we are in, this team should be able to take on a ton of salary, and if given the choice, I'd rather see them get a guy who is expensive, but who doesn't cost much in terms of prospects, than give up a Danks and a Kinsler as part of a deal for someone who is more financially affordable.

by Adam J. Morris on May 21, 2005 3:24 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

the short term...
[i]RicRod and Dominguez should be up now.[/i]

You realize neither of these guys has been very sharp lately...

As in, Astacio has been sharper than RicRod lately.  Loe's been better than Juan.

I mention this because, while I like the overall forward thinkingness of pretty much 1 through 5, it seems like it's more likely to happen on a longer timeframe.  (Hopefully Rod will be the first to go.)

With such obvious needs to address, management will be showing its real motivation to win in this year's personnel movements (or lack thereof).  The few weeks before the trade deadline, especially, are going to be interesting...more than a few white flags will be hoisted around the league by then.

by hightowersmith on May 21, 2005 3:34 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

RicRod and Dominguez
RicRod has struggled the last couple of starts, no question.

Nevertheless, he's been solid this season overall, and I think he's a better pitcher than Astacio.  I'd rather take my chances with him, going forward, than with Pedro.

I think, though, a lot of that reflects an organizational hedging...I think the organization wants RicRod available as insurance, in case the Ho or Rogers gets hurt, and thus is willing to accept the trade-off of having a possible downgrade with Astacio in the rotation in order to keep that insurance in place.  I believe the thinking is, if we axe Astacio and call up RicRod, we may improve slightly, but then if someone else gets hurt, we can't get Astacio back.  I think that mentality is also why Gerald Laird is still in AAA.

Dominguez, same thing...I think over the course of the season, he'll be better in the setup role than Loe or Regilio.  Or Brocail, for that matter, although that's another story.  And generally, regardless of recent struggles, I'd rather take my chances with the better player, rather than try to do a form of "market timing" by going with the hotter hand.

by Adam J. Morris on May 21, 2005 3:44 PM CDT to parent up   0 recs

The don-gon Rangers
The Do-Nothin' Go-Nowhere Rangers.
  Hide and watch as the management fixes no ills and takes credit for a .500 par team.

  Did I say going nowhere?

 Well, there's always next year .  .  . for now anyways.

by Iaanmte on May 21, 2005 2:21 PM CDT   0 recs

Bob Sturm
Adam gets more props on the Ticket.  He referenced this blog entry.

by Chris Martin on May 24, 2005 1:53 PM CDT   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Img_0175_small
Blake Beavan Interview
Jeterthrow5150361_yankees_v_royals_small
LSB Community Prospect Project: #14
Jeterthrow5150361_yankees_v_royals_small
LSB Community Prospect Project: #13
Small
Rangers vs A's community rankings
Jeterthrow5150361_yankees_v_royals_small
LSB Community Prospect Project: #12

Recent FanPosts

Julyatthelake07funwithdavisjune2608_small
Newberg Report book release party for the 2009 BE
Small
Who would have thought... Few offered Arbitration
Fh030004_small
Rule 5 Previews
Jd_pray_small
Teagarden Untouchable?
Small
Who is your Texas Ranger prospect that is going to shoot up the prospect sheet next season?
Small
Josh's commercial
George-w-bush-picture_small
OT: BCS Rankings

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Site Meter