Lone Star Ball: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: SB Nation NBA Power Rankings for Week 2

Perception Become Reality

The casual Ranger fan would probably describe 2004's surprising squad as a combination of good hitting and bad pitching, when in fact the opposite was the truth. Last year's bunch slugged with authority but had difficulty getting on base. The bullpen dominated and the rotation, cobbled together though it was, didn't perform that much below the league average.

In 2005, the team has changed to meet perceptions:

Team OPS+:
2004- 94
2005- 108

Team ERA+:
2004- 111
2005- 91

Note to the uninitiated:  statistical terms appended with "+" are indexes that measure performance adjusted for league and home park.  Higher scores indicate a better performance, and 100 is average.

0 recs  |  Comment 4 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Thank you
  for setting the record straight.
  The bull pen's performance last season was inspiring, and the inability of Ranger hitters, at times, to become base runners was infuriating.  
  The Rangers need to avenge themselves this year for the 4 game sweep dealt by the Orioles.
  As Rangers fans we still have more to look forward to than we have to regret in this season.
"El Jimador goes down smooth and easy, just like the Rangers in June." Scott Lucas

by Iaanmte on Jul 1, 2005 2:09 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Good numbers
Interestingly, if you average the hitting and pitching for each season, 102.5 and 99.5, a slightly above average team and right at an average team. And that's what they've had.

by Brett Perryman on Jul 1, 2005 3:29 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

i don't understand
the value of taking away park effects, at least in this case.  if the idea is to figure out what team is better head to head on neutral ground, it makes sense.  but if i'm trying to figure out how the rangers will finish if on the same pace, i want ot know how they've been doing, ameriquest and all, since half of their games are played there.  

right?

by ab03 on Jul 1, 2005 4:13 PM CDT reply actions   0 recs

Here's why:
Stats like ERA+ adjust not only for league and park but also for year. It's not enough to say (for example) that the Rangers are scoring the same number of runs as last year, because scoring is down about one-quarter run per game in the AL this season. So, a team that is scoring five runs per game this year is actually performing better than one that scored 5 runs/game last year, other factors being equal.

by Lucas on Jul 1, 2005 4:54 PM CDT up reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about Texas Rangers.
Start posting about the Rangers »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Andrus_jersey2_small
Scheppers and Gutierrez - AFL Rising Stars Game
Kinsicon_small
My "Newberg Report" cover artwork - Wallpapers & stuff

Recent FanPosts

Kevin_richardsons_wife_small
OT-Ski recs for newbies
Cjkrunk_small
NFL Week 9 GDT 2
Barcodes_small
NFL Week 9 GDT
Rsz_200px-heeseopchoi_20050515_small
Goldstein on Borbon
Feliz_holland_hunter_small
AFL Rising Stars Game Thread
Ea_small
OT: CFB 11/07
Franklin_4_lg_small
Mass Murder at Fort Hood
Tcuhomecoming2008_small
Whither Godzilla?
Tbone_small
Fire up the hot stove

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

SPONSORS


Managers

Th_buckykatt_small Adam J. Morris